1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to apparatus and methods for formation fluid collection and testing.
2. Description of the Related Art
During both drilling of a wellbore and after drilling, fluid (oil, gas and water) from the formation is often extracted to determine the nature of the hydrocarbons in hydrocarbon-bearing formations. Fluid samples are often collected in sample chambers and the collected samples are tested to determine various properties of the extracted formation fluid. To drill a well, drilling fluid is circulated under pressure greater than the pressure of the formation in which the well is drilled. The drilling fluid invades into the formation surrounding the wellbore to varying depths, referred to as the invaded zone, which contaminates the original fluid present in the invaded zone. To collect samples of the original fluid present in the formation, a formation testing tool is conveyed into the wellbore. A pump typically extracts the fluid from the formation via a sealed probe placed against the inside wall of the wellbore. The initially extracted fluid is discarded into the wellbore while testing it for contamination. When the extracted fluid is sufficiently clean, samples are collected in chambers for further analysis. Single and concentric probes have been proposed for extracting formation fluid. In concentric probes, separate pumps are used to extract fluid from the formation via an outer probe and an inner probe. The outer probe extracts the fluid present around the inner probe, which aids in removing the contaminated fluid more efficiently and may prevent fluid from the wellbore to flow into the inner probe. When the contamination level is at an acceptable level, the fluid from the inner probe is pumped into sample chambers, while the fluid from the outer probe is discharged into the wellbore or into a sample chamber for analysis.
Current formation testing systems typically utilize two or more pumps to perform specific functions, such as to extract fluid from the formation. Such systems utilize a single (or common) hydraulic bus or line to supply pressurized fluid to operate hydraulically-operated devices, such as the pumps, flow control valves and other devices. During operation, it is desirable to independently operate some of the devices coupled to the single hydraulic line and/or turn on some, but not all, of the devices. It is also desirable to turn on and turn off such devices when needed to maintain desired pressure in the common hydraulic line to save energy used for pumping the pressurized fluid.
The disclosure herein provides a formation evaluation system that allows independent operation of two or more pumps using a common hydraulic bus.
In one aspect, an apparatus for use in a wellbore formed in a formation is disclosed that in one embodiment includes a device for supplying a hydraulic fluid under pressure to a common hydraulic line, a first pump in hydraulic communication with the common hydraulic line via a first variable fluid control device, a second pump in hydraulic communication with the common hydraulic line via a second variable fluid control device, and at least one controller that controls flow of the hydraulic fluid from the first variable flow control device to the first pump and the flow of the hydraulic fluid from the second variable flow control device to the second pump to independently control the operation of the first pump and the second pump. In another aspect, the first pump is coupled to a first probe for extracting fluid from the formation.
In another aspect, a formation testing tool is disclosed for obtaining fluid samples from a formation. In one embodiment the formation testing tool includes a first probe and second probe surrounding the first probe, wherein each of the first probe and the second probe is configured to sealingly contact a wall of a wellbore formed in a formation. The tool further includes a power unit that supplies a hydraulic fluid under pressure to a common hydraulic line, a first pump in hydraulic communication with the common hydraulic line via a first variable flow control device, a second pump in hydraulic communication with the common hydraulic line via a second variable flow control device. The first pump is in fluid communication with the first probe for extracting fluid from the formation and the second pump is in fluid communication with the second probe for extracting fluid from the formation. A controller independently controls the supply of the hydraulic fluid from the common hydraulic line to the first and second variable flow control devices to independently control the operation of the first and second pumps.
Examples of certain features of the apparatus and methods disclosed herein are summarized rather broadly in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood. There are, of course, additional features of the apparatus and methods disclosed hereinafter that will form the subject of the claims.
For detailed understanding of the present disclosure, references should be made to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A pump 130 is coupled to the inner probe 110 via a fluid line 132 for withdrawing fluid 111a from formation 102 via line 110a. To draw or extract fluid 111a from formation 102, pump 130 is activated, which extracts the fluid 111a into line 110a. The extracted fluid may be pumped into a chamber 136 via a flow control device 134 or discharged into the wellbore 101 via a fluid line 141 and the flow control device 134. A pump 140 is coupled to the outer probe 150 via a fluid line 142 for withdrawing fluid 111b from formation 102 via line 150a. To draw or extract fluid 111b from formation 102, pump 140 is activated to extract the fluid 111b into line 150a and thus line 142. The fluid withdrawn into line 142 may be discharged into the wellbore 101 via a line 144 and valve 145 or into a collection chamber 148 via line 146 and valve 147.
The tool 120 further includes a controller 170 that contains circuits 172 for use in operating various components of the tool 120, a processor 174, such as a microprocessor, a data storage device 176, such as a solid state memory, and programs 178 accessible to the processor 174 for executing instruction contained therein. The system 100 also includes a controller 190 at the surface that contains circuits 192, a processor 194, a data storage device 196 and programs 198 accessible to processor for executing instructions contained therein. Controllers 170 and 190 are in a two-way communication with each other and either alone or in combination may control the operation of the various devices in tool 120.
To obtain clean formation fluid samples, the tool 120 is conveyed and placed at a selected depth in the wellbore 101. Pads 160a and 160b are activated to contact the wellbore wall 101a. The inner probe 110 and outer probe 150 are activated to urge against the wellbore wall 101a to seal the probes 110 and 150 against the wellbore wall 101a. In one aspect, both the inner and outer probes 110 and 150 are activated simultaneously or substantially simultaneously. Pumps 130 and 140 are activated to draw the formation fluid into their respective probes. Activating pump 140 causes the fluid 111b around the probe 110 to flow into the outer probe 150, while activating pump 130 causes the fluid 111a to flow into the inner probe 110. The fluid initially drawn through the probes 110 and 150 (111a and 111b) is the fluid present in the invaded zone and is thus contaminated. A fluid evaluation or testing device 185 may be used to determine when the fluid 111a being withdrawn from probe 110 is sufficiently clean so that fluid samples may be collected. Similarly, a fluid evaluation device 186 may be utilized to determination the contamination level of the fluid 111b withdrawn from probe 150. Any device, including, but not limited to, an optical device, may be utilized for determining contamination in the withdrawn fluids. As long as the contamination in the fluid 111a being withdrawn from probe 110 is above a threshold or is otherwise not satisfactory, such fluid may be discharged into the wellbore 101 via a flow control device 135 and fluid line 141. Once the fluid 111a is clean (e. e., below a threshold), the fluid may be collected in sample chamber 136 by opening valve 134 and closing valve 135. The pump 140 continues to pump the fluid 111b from the probe 150 into the wellbore 101 or into chamber 148. The pumps and flow control devices in the tool 120 may be controlled by the controller 170 according to instructions stored in programs 178 and/or instructions provided by the surface controller 190. Alternatively, controller 190 may control the operation of one or more devices in the tool 120 according to instructions provided by programs 198.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6301959 | Hrametz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6719049 | Sherwood et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6964301 | Hill et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7090012 | Hill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114385 | Fisseler et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7178591 | Del Campo et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7458419 | Nold, III et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7461547 | Terabayashi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484563 | Zazovsky et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7644610 | Meister | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7757760 | Sherwood et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7836951 | Georgi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841406 | Zazovsky et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857049 | Sherwood | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8047286 | Zazovsky et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082780 | Vannuffelen et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091635 | Vasques et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8109140 | Tustin et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8151878 | Georgi et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162052 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8210260 | Milkovisch et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8215389 | Nold, III et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220536 | Tao et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20070079962 | Zazovsky et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20100132941 | van Zuilekom et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100155061 | Zazovsky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110139448 | Ciglenec et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110284219 | Pomerantz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120053838 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120132419 | Zazovsky et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20140196532 | Bullock et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140224474 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |