The present invention relates to a device and a method for obtaining protein-enriched fractions from human or animal milk as well as to a protein-enriched fraction of milk obtained from the method and to a use thereof.
Breastfeeding with breast milk is commonly regarded as very important for the development of newborns. Breastmilk is uniquely adapted to the needs of human babies, providing them with the nutrients they need to grow and thrive, but at the same time incorporating a multitude of immunological, antibacterial and in general antipatogenic factors and epigenetic effects that the industry needs can not be reproduced. Bioactive proteins can have enzymatic activity, enhance nutrient absorption, stimulate growth, modulate the immune system and assist in the defense against pathogens. Key bioactive proteins in human milk include lysozyme, α-lactalbumin, κ-casein and β-casein, as well as lactoferrin and immunoglobulins, especially sIgA [1] (REF: [1] B. Löhnerdal, P. Erdmann, S. K. Thakkar, J. Sauser, and F. Destaillats, “Longitudinal evolution of true protein, amino acids and bioactive proteins in breast milk: a developmental perspective,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2017 and [2] C. R. Martin, P. R. Ling, and G. L. Blackburn, “Review of infant feeding: Key features of breast milk and infant formula,” Nutrients. 2016.)
Breast milk is the only known substance that has nourishing and at the same time immune-modulating functions for the child organism. The composition of breast milk changes over time. And there are suggestions that at the end of first year and after the nourishing function of breastfeeding in newborns decreases at the age of one year and above, and the immune-modulating function increases [REF: B. VAN'T LAND, G. BOEHM, J. GARSSEN: Breast Milk: Components with Immune Modulating Potential and Their Possible Role in Immune Mediated Disease Resistance, in: Dietary Components and Immune Function, 2010; M. T. PERRIN, A. FOGLEMAN, J. C. ALLEN: The nutritive and immunoprotective quality of human milk beyond 1 year postpartum: are lactation-duration-based donor exclusions justified? In Journal of Human Lactation. 2013].
Still, breastfeeding rates are generally too low, especially in developed countries. Due to socio-economic conditions, and especially because of their professional activity, women often do not have enough time to fulfill the ideal breastfeeding criteria (continuous breastfeeding, ie breastmilk with solid food) for up to two years and beyond. In developed countries, only 25% of mothers quit after 10 months or more [REF: C. G. VICTORA ET AL.: Breast feeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect, in The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10017. pp. 475-490].
In order to close the gap between the actual breastfeeding rate and the physiological needs of babies infant formula milk products are available, mainly based on cow's milk. However, these products are inferior to breast milk in their physiological effects. In particular, they absolutely can not fulfill the immunomodulatory functions of breast milk [REF: N. J. ANDREAS, B. KAMPMANN, K. MEHRING LE-DOARE: Human Breast Milk: A review of its composition and bioactivity, in Early Human Development, vol. 91, no. 11. pp. 629-635, 2015; J. PENDERS: Early diet and the infant good microbiome How breastfeeding and solid foods shape the microbiome, in Microbiota in health and disease: from pregnancy to childhood, 2017].
A particular problem is revealed in premature infants. Also, they ideally need breast milk (from their mother or a donor). However, the composition of human milk is not geared to the needs of premature babies. Premature babies need a higher protein content. As a result of protein deficiency, there is a risk that premature babies are disturbed in their growth. To counteract this problem, cow's milk, donkey's milk or soy proteins are added to the donor milk in order to increase their nutritional value (so-called enrichment process). However, enrichment with proteins of non-human origin leads to risks, in particular for gastrointestinal diseases, increased risks of infection increased risk of allergies and increase the risk of NEC—the leading mortality cause of preterm babies [REF: T. T. Colaizy et al.: Impact of Optimized Breast Feeding on the Cost of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants, in J. Pediatr., 2016; N. D. Embleton et al.: Effectiveness of Human Milk-Based Fortifiers for Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: Case Not Proven, Breastfeed. Med., 2013].
Processes for obtaining protein-enriched fractions from breast milk are known and have been described, inter alia in EP 0 173 999 A2 (Biotest Pharma GmbH). The pH of the milk is reduced and the milk is filtered using a cross-flow filtration unit. Low-molecular weight components are removed from the resulting filtrate by a second cross-flow filtration.
Isolation and/or enrichment of protein-rich fractions from milk is now commonly done by means of laboratory methods by appropriately trained professionals.
It is the object of the invention to create a device for obtaining protein-enriched fractions from human or animal milk pertaining to the technical field initially mentioned, that simplifies the process, especially for on-site application.
The solution of the invention is specified by the features of claim 1. According to the invention the device comprises
In the filtering unit, an ultrafiltration step takes place. In particular, the corresponding filter has a membrane pore size which is at least two times less than the weight of the target molecules in the permeate. The pore size can be varied so that the filtrate has the desired proteins. Usually, the NMWL it should not exceed 10 kDa.
Preferably, the delipidating unit and the filtering unit are integrated as components of the device. However, these units can also be configured as separate modules or modules that can be combined to form a structural unit. The device is a functional unit that allows the recovery of protein-enriched fractions from the human or animal breast milk outside the laboratory. The device may be designed in such a way that its use does not require any professional laboratory knowledge, but may also be used by laymen (especially mothers and nurses).
According to the invention, a method for obtaining protein-enriched fractions from human or animal milk, comprises the steps of:
In particular, the pH of the milk is not modified, but the product is obtained substantially be reducing the lipid content and subsequent filtering.
Reducing the lipid content avoids fouling of the nanofilter for the increase of protein concentration.
The present invention provides an easy-to-use device or an easily performed method which allows the isolation of protein-enriched fractions of breast milk even by persons without laboratory technical knowledge, in particular also by mothers and nurses. In particular, the present invention gives mothers the opportunity to stock up on their newborn important fractions of breast milk to continue to provide for the infant even after breastfeeding has stopped. However, the present invention also makes it possible, with a view to the optimal nutrition of preterm infants, to condition breast milk in its ingredients (in particular with regard to protein content). Also conceivable are other applications of the present invention, in particular in the field of recovery of breast milk or of fractions thereof by nurses.
The suggested device allows for substantially reducing the final cost of human milk origin fortifiers (HMOF) compared with current industrial products.
It makes them more available in developed countries and especially in developing ones, providing better outcome for preterm infants. HMOF wide administration would reduce also the total duration of hospitalization of the infants, meaning less spending for hospitals.
If hospitals prepare the protein fortifier from the milk, collected locally, it reduces also the cost of the donor milk itself and thus can decrease further the price of HMOF prepared using the inventive device and method on site. Furthermore, the impact on the environment may be reduced because the product does not have to be shipped, it is prepared on site for local consumption.
Depending on the indication, the filtrate of the filtered permeate is suitable for direct administration to the premature or newborn or for preservation in stock. The present invention may also be applied to the rearing of animals, including within the framework of zoological breeding programs.
Due to the simple device and method, the risk of losing proteins is substantially reduced compared to long elaborative protocols with multiple steps. Accordingly, the protein yield after enrichment may be increased.
Preferably, the delipidating unit comprises a replaceable filter. In the corresponding delipidating unit, the filtrated, delipidated milk (filtrate) with the immunoglobulins, alpha-lactalbumin, serum albumin, lactoferrin and the other components (lactose, minerals, micronutrients etc.) is obtained as permeate.
In today's large scale processes, delipidation is usually based on centrifugation because it was assumed that filters would be immediately blocked by the lipids. Surprisingly, it has been found that the composition of human milk lipid micelles allows to have an efficient filtering process—compared to e. g. cow micelles. It is not even mandatory to employ a cross-flow filtering process, but dead-end filtration is also applicable. This simplifies the process and the buildup of a corresponding device.
In a preferred embodiment, the filter of the delipidating device is a glass microfiber filter. It has been found that the micelles, in particular of human milk, stay inside of a multilayer glass microfiber filter.
The filter material may be different, but should be particularly suitable for labile proteins to achieve minimal absorption and protein loss and same time allow to not penetrate the lipid fraction inside the filtrate.
Preferably, the filter of the delipidating device has a pore size of less than 0.5 μm, preferably of less than 0.35 μm. Correspondingly, the lipid content is reduced by microfiltration, employing a filter having a pore size of less than 0.5 μm, preferably of less than 0.35 μm.
Instead of or in addition to a filter the delipidating device may comprise further components, in particular for centrifugation.
Advantageously, the device further comprises a pasteurizing unit for pasteurizing the delipidated milk. In an alternative embodiment, the pasteurizing unit may be arranged to pasteurize the human or animal milk prior to reducing the lipid content.
Preferably, the device further comprises a suction system and/or a pump system cooperating with the delipidating unit and/or the filtering unit to increase filtering efficiency and throughput. In order to provide the driving force for the filtering of the liquid in the first and/or in the second processing step, centrifugation may be employed.
In a preferred embodiment, the delipidating unit and the filtering unit are arranged in a closed system 61 where the delipidated milk is transferred from the delipidating unit to the filtering unit.
A reservoir may be provided in fluid connection with an output of the delipidating unit and with an input of the filtering unit. In this case, a volume of the reservoir is preferably 5 l or less, in particular 2.5 l or less.
In particular, a total volume of the protein-enriched fraction obtained from an initial volume of the human or animal milk is less than a fifth of the initial volume.
Both the delipidation step as well as the concentration step may be run under controlled temperature, e. g. in a controlled temperature environment. Different temperature regimes are possible. In a first regime, both steps are run at a temperature of 0-10° C. to avoid protein degradation and meet biosafety standards.
In a second regime, the temperature is selectively increased for certain substeps, in particular for the concentration step. Doing so increases the filtration process. After filtration, the products may be rapidly cooled.
Other advantageous embodiments and combinations of features come out from the detailed description below and the entirety of the claims.
The drawings used to explain the embodiments show:
In the figures, the same components are given the same reference symbols.
The
The starting product is human breast milk 1. It flows through a first filter 2 having a pore size of 0.2 μm (microfiltration step 10). The filter 2 is a 3-layer glass microfiber filter (GMF), available e. g. from GE Whatman. The filter 2 separates lipids from the rest of the human milk. Due to the small pore size, milk is also partially sterilized as most of the bacteria have a size of 0.5 μm or more. Nevertheless, it is advisable to pasteurize the starting product (or the intermediate product) due to bacteria with irregular shape, spores, etc.
Lipids precipitate on the first filter 2, the intermediate product (permeate) 3 is further treated by application of a second filter 4, having a nominal molecular weight limit of 10 kDa (nanofiltration step 20). Thereby, the concentration of proteins in the intermediate product 3 is increased. The result is a protein enriched fraction 5. Experiments have shown that the protein fraction does not precipitate and remains soluble.
The process is supported by a vacuum applied (as shown in more detail below, in connection with
Both filters 2, 4 are single-usage. They are changed after each batch to avoid bacterial contamination.
The process is applied to batches of milk having a volume of 1.5 l (or less). The desired concentration factor is 10, i. e. the total volume of the protein-enriched fraction obtained from an initial volume of the human or animal milk is about a tenth of the initial volume. This yields a protein-enriched fraction with a protein amount of about 10 g/l.
Laboratory experiments have shown that the delipidation does not cause any significant loss of the total protein content since the filter has a very low unspecific binding capacity, i.e. proteins do not stick to the surface but freely pass the membrane.
The
The output of the filter 2 is connected to a lid 53 of a second reservoir 54. A vacuum source 55 is also connected to the lid 53 in order to support the flow of the milk through the first filter 2, passing a valve 56. The second reservoir 54 has a volume of 0.5 l. It is connected to a third reservoir 57 with a volume of 0.5 l, the aforementioend second filter being arranged in the passage 58 between the second reservoir 54 and the third reservoir 57. A further connection connects the vacuum source 55 to the passage 58, passing another valve 59. This supports the extraction of the filtrate collected in the third reservoir 57 from the intermediate product stored in the second reservoir 54.
The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above. In particular, the inventive device may be supplemented with further elements to simplify the operation, in particular with respect to the supply and removal of educts and products. The vacuum system may be supplemented or replaced by an air pressure system and/or a pump system, e.g., based on a peristaltic pump. A stirring device 60, e.g., a magnetic stirrer, may be used to prevent accumulation of proteins on the surface of the membrane of the second filter.
Details of the components, such as filter materials and/or pore sizes, may be adapted.
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2021/050366, filed internationally on Jan. 11, 2021, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3911108 | Singh | Oct 1975 | A |
4051235 | Plymate | Sep 1977 | A |
4644056 | Kothe et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4784850 | Abraham | Nov 1988 | A |
5147548 | Hies et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
6096870 | Mozaffar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6162472 | Griffin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6444247 | Gorewit | Sep 2002 | B1 |
8826810 | Norelius | Sep 2014 | B1 |
9776138 | Innings et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20030059512 | Kopf | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040028667 | Norman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040219266 | Milliken et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060102016 | Ulrich et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060204632 | Barrett-Reis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210668 | Thorsoe | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070166447 | Ur-Rehman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080050498 | Sherwood | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075819 | Hartmann et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090028990 | Kwon et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100112152 | Sinnema | May 2010 | A1 |
20100221359 | Gohlke et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110206684 | Medo | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130059050 | Fournell | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140193555 | Czank et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140271980 | Eaker et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140272027 | Elster et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302219 | Tikanmaki | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150099036 | Aichinger | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150305383 | Georgi et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160021904 | Verdi | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160362477 | Sand et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170164630 | Dimauro et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172167 | Silver et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170196234 | Puigferrat et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170280737 | Liao | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180343880 | Metzger | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190223461 | Ur-Rehman et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190263583 | Downie et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190376942 | Birlouez-Aragon | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200196620 | Arena et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200359642 | Fournell | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210239671 | Suhr et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20240009244 | Yudina et al. | Jan 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
105016 | Mar 2003 | BG |
2360837 | Aug 2000 | CA |
1037276 | Nov 1989 | CN |
101014253 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101605470 | Dec 2009 | CN |
101731446 | Jun 2010 | CN |
102630803 | Aug 2012 | CN |
204466781 | Jul 2015 | CN |
106417888 | Feb 2017 | CN |
107576625 | Jan 2018 | CN |
109122855 | Jan 2019 | CN |
109452178 | Mar 2019 | CN |
110214703 | Sep 2019 | CN |
209628538 | Nov 2019 | CN |
113457452 | Jan 2021 | CN |
112642294 | Apr 2021 | CN |
112913871 | Jun 2021 | CN |
113287656 | Aug 2021 | CN |
283937 | Apr 1989 | DE |
4118168 | Jan 1993 | DE |
9117058 | Jun 1995 | DE |
19510969 | Sep 1996 | DE |
19548221 | May 1997 | DE |
102006053017 | May 2008 | DE |
102013219932 | Apr 2015 | DE |
102021105641 | Sep 2022 | DE |
0173999 | Mar 1986 | EP |
0316938 | May 1989 | EP |
0338229 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0391416 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0398802 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0410272 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0363896 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0638242 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0741976 | Nov 1996 | EP |
1055372 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1637880 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1982599 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2280999 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2572593 | Mar 2013 | EP |
2762490 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2833767 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2675281 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2896294 | Jul 2015 | EP |
2926843 | Oct 2015 | EP |
2992900 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3056276 | Aug 2016 | EP |
3225114 | Oct 2017 | EP |
3281683 | Feb 2018 | EP |
3298903 | Mar 2018 | EP |
2914612 | Nov 2018 | EP |
3476220 | May 2019 | EP |
3496544 | Jun 2019 | EP |
2334190 | Sep 2020 | EP |
3175238 | Aug 2021 | EP |
3855897 | Aug 2021 | EP |
3949741 | Feb 2022 | EP |
4063834 | Sep 2022 | EP |
2273885 | Jul 1994 | GB |
2525921 | Nov 2015 | GB |
2544100 | May 2017 | GB |
511562 | Oct 2003 | NZ |
90318 | Nov 1989 | PT |
WO-1989011226 | Nov 1989 | WO |
WO-1995010192 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO-1996032021 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-1999015024 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-2000060949 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-2001003515 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-2003100377 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2006026879 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006119560 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007035870 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2008027572 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2008067486 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2008073888 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO-2008127104 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2008144922 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2008146276 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009092629 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009139624 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO-2010065652 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO-2010128051 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO-2012030764 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012110705 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2013020081 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2013068653 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013137714 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO-2013150070 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2014125382 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO-2014163486 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2015056166 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO-2015103561 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2015128512 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO-2015168418 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO-2016022152 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO-2016109659 | Jul 2016 | WO |
WO-2016168167 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2016168698 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2017027081 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO-2017048881 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-2017090049 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO-2017117409 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO-2017220697 | Dec 2017 | WO |
WO-2018028764 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO-2018028765 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO-2018029222 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO-2018053535 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO-2018122695 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO-2018132676 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO-2018202636 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO-2019126308 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO-2019160402 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO-2019160416 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO-2020002422 | Jan 2020 | WO |
WO-2020067883 | Apr 2020 | WO |
WO-2020115196 | Jun 2020 | WO |
WO-2020140185 | Jul 2020 | WO |
WO-2020168439 | Aug 2020 | WO |
WO-2020176607 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO-2020212954 | Oct 2020 | WO |
WO-2022081623 | Apr 2022 | WO |
WO-2022085007 | Apr 2022 | WO |
WO-2022148549 | Jul 2022 | WO |
WO-2022159989 | Jul 2022 | WO |
WO-2022182837 | Sep 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Andreas et al., (2015). “Human Breast Milk: A review of its composition and bioactivity,” Early Human Development, 91(11):629-635, 19 pages. |
Bertino et al., (2017). “New human milk fortifiers for the preterm infant,” Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine, 6(1):e060124, 7 pages. |
Colaizy et al., (2016). “Impact of Optimized Breast Feeding on the Cost of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants,” J. Pediatr., 175:100-105.e2, 16 pages. |
Embleton et al., (2013). “Effectiveness of Human Milk-Based Fortifiers for Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: Case Not Proven,” Breastfeed. Med., 8(4):421. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2021/050366 mailed on May 7, 2021. 7 pages. |
Lonnerdal et al., (2017). “Longitudinal evolution of true protein, amino acids and bioactive proteins in breast milk: a developmental perspective,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 41:1-11. |
Martin et al., (2016). “Review of infant feeding: Key features of breast milk and infant formula,” Nutrients, 8(5):279, 11 pages. |
Moro et al., (2015). “Human Milk in Feeding Premature Infants: Consensus Statement,” JPGN, 61(1):S16-S19. |
Van't Land et al., (2010). “Chapter 2: Breast Milk: Components with Immune Modulating Potential and Their Possible Role in Immune Mediated Disease Resistance,” Dietary Components and Immune Function, 25-41. |
Victora et al., (2016). “Breast feeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect,” Lancet, 387(10017):475-490, 16 pages. |
Extended European Search Report and Opinion received for European Patent Application No. 23184820.1 mailed on Nov. 22, 2023, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230220023 A1 | Jul 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2021/050366 | Jan 2021 | WO |
Child | 18181939 | US |