Exemplary embodiments of the present invention relate generally to a latch and, more particularly, to a latch having a release mechanism.
Conventional latches are used to restrain the movement of one member or element with respect to another. For example, conventional door latches restrain the movement of a door with respect to a surrounding door frame. The function of such latches is to hold the door secure within the frame until the latch is released and the door is free to open. Existing latches typically have mechanical connections linking the latch to actuation elements which can be actuated by a user to release the latch. Movement of the actuation elements is transferred through the mechanical connections and will cause the latch to release. The mechanical connections can be one or more rods, cables, gears, or other suitable elements or devices.
Some latches include an electromechanical linkage for pivoting a latch between a latched and an unlatched position. Activation of such a linkage often creates noise when adjacent components engage or contact one another. Latch sound quality can enhance or detract from the overall perception of quality by an end user about the construction of the vehicle. As a result, more emphasis is being placed on the ability of the latch to absorb any noise emissions that may occur during operation and activation of a release mechanism.
Accordingly, while existing latch mechanisms are suitable, the need for improvement remains, particularly in providing a latch mechanism having improved sound quality noise dampening and energy absorption.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a latch is provided including a fork bolt configured to rotate between an unlatched position and a latched position. A bellcrank lever is operably coupled to the fork bolt via a detent lever. The bellcrank lever has an engagement ledge located adjacent a slot of the bellcrank lever. The engagement shelf prevents movement of a gear configured to move the detent lever via movement of the bellcrank lever.
The above-described and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, drawings, and appended claims.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
With reference to all of the FIGS., an exemplary latch 10 having a power release mechanism 20 for opening the latch 10 is illustrated. This latch 10 may be integrated into a component of a vehicle, such as a structural component adjacent a lift gate or trunk of the vehicle for example. Of course, other locations and uses of latch 10 are considered to be within the scope of various embodiments of the present invention.
Referring now to
The power release mechanism 20 of the latch 10 has a gear 24 that is driven by a motor M of the power release mechanism 20. Gear 24 is mounted for rotation about a shaft 22. Gear 24 engages a helical gear or worm gear for example, connected to a drive shaft of the motor M. When the motor M is energized, the rotation of the worm gear is imparted to the gear 24. At least one gear protrusion 28 extends generally perpendicularly from a planar surface 26 of the gear 24. In one embodiment, the gear 24 includes two gear protrusions 28′, 28″ arranged 180 degrees apart from each other.
A bellcrank lever 60, rotatable about a pin P1 of the latch 10, is operably coupled to the gear 24 and the detent lever 30 such that motor M can rotate the detent lever 30 to allow the fork bolt 40 to transition from the closed position to the open position. In one embodiment, the bellcrank lever 60 includes a generally curved upper portion 62 extending from adjacent pin P1 to a first end 64. The curved upper portion 62 includes a slot 66 for receiving shaft 22 and a corresponding hub 23 of the gear 24. Slot 66 is configured to limit rotation of the bellcrank lever 60 about pin P1 in the direction indicated by arrow B. The upper portion 62 of the bellcrank lever 60 also includes an engagement ledge 68 positioned along a portion of slot 66, near pin P1 and adjacent shaft 22 (best shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
However, during a closing operation of the latch 10, receipt of the striker 90 within the throat 42 of the fork bolt 40 causes the fork bolt 40 to rotate in the direction opposite the direction indicated by arrow F towards a latched position and the detent lever 30 to slide relative to the fork bolt protrusion 50. The biasing force generated by spring 16 on the detent lever 30 will cause the bellcrank lever 60, operably coupled thereto, to pivot about pin P1 to a home position.
By restricting movement of the gear 24 when the forkbolt 40 is in an unlatched position, the “machine gunning effect” generated in conventional latches when the gear protrusions 28 engage and disengage the bellcrank lever 60 is averted.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Non-provisional application No. 61/754,677 filed Jan. 21, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4664430 | Bernard | May 1987 | A |
4793640 | Stewart, Sr. | Dec 1988 | A |
5632515 | Dowling | May 1997 | A |
5634677 | Buscher | Jun 1997 | A |
5697237 | Dilger | Dec 1997 | A |
5934717 | Wirths | Aug 1999 | A |
5938253 | Szablewski | Aug 1999 | A |
6338508 | Kleefeldt | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6568722 | Raffelsiefer | May 2003 | B2 |
6712407 | Duriez | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6936983 | Kachouh | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7032937 | Boecker | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7261333 | Tomaszewski | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7399010 | Hunt | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8029031 | Hunt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8328249 | Corrales | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8522583 | Cumbo | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8622443 | Tomaszewski | Jan 2014 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1556890 | Dec 2004 | CN |
200952289 | Sep 2007 | CN |
358571 | Jun 1991 | JP |
Entry |
---|
CN Office Action for Application No. 201410027214.8; Date of Issue: Dec. 14, 2015. |
English Translation of CN Office Action for Application No. 201410027214.8; Date of Issue: Dec. 14, 2015. |
English Translation to CN1556890A Abstract. |
English Translation to CN200952289Y Abstract. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140203573 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61754677 | Jan 2013 | US |