The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for decreasing rot and insect damage to in-ground wood and thereby increasing the effective life of the wood, and more specifically relates to a barrier system for in-ground wood that prevents microbes and insects from gaining access to the wood in order to prevent rot at the most critical structural portion of the wood.
Wooden poles of a variety of descriptions are sunk into the ground for use as supports. Examples include posts for fencing, supports for decking and other structures, and utility poles. Wooden poles are used as fence posts for many different styles of fences because they are both highly functional and often very attractive. Although there are many techniques for building fencing using wooden posts, in a typical situation the post is sunk into the ground, typically in a pre-drilled or pre-dug hole, which is then filled in with soil, gravel or concrete. Some type of railing is then attached to the poles to complete the fencing.
The effective life of in-ground wood such as a wooden fence post depends on a variety of factors, including for instance the species of wood that is used, the soil conditions including the amount of moisture in the soil and the composition of the soil—microbial-caused decomposition of wood fiber eventually results in rot and insect damage can further weaken the posts. While some species of wood such as some types of cedar are notoriously long-lasting as fencing posts, all in-ground wood will eventually decompose and the post will therefore fail and need to be replaced. In some areas where there is significant moisture in the ground, wooden fence posts can fail in a matter of years from the combination of bacterial and other microbial decomposition of the wood and insect damage.
Treated wooden fencing has significantly improved the longevity of in-ground wooden posts. Treating wooden posts involves applying preservatives of various types to the wood so that microbial and insect degradation of the wood fibers is slowed or stopped. Treatments can include simple application of liquid preservatives, and more complicated processes that involve applying preservatives to the wood under pressure so that the preservatives penetrate into the wood.
Regardless of the way in which the wood is treated, the preservatives that are used often contain dangerous and toxic chemicals that could be harmful to health, or at least raise questions about their proper use in the environment. When pressure treated wood is used for in-ground applications such as fence posts, some of the chemicals used as preservatives can leach into the soil and the United States Environmental Protection Agency recommends that wood treated with the commonly used preservative chromated copper arsenate (“CCA”) should not be used in proximity to edible plants.
For these and a variety of other reasons, more and more consumers are questioning use of products that add such toxins to the soil and are therefore seeking out alternatives to use of treated wood. Yet, non-treated wood decays at a more rapid rate than its treated counterpart so treated posts and the like are very commonly used. The consumer must therefore make a decision by balancing the risks of using treated wood versus the possible environmental concerns, and the relatively lesser life span of untreated wood. Regardless of whether a consumer uses treated or untreated wood, there is a need for apparatus and systems that enhance the effective life of in-ground wood such as posts and the like. And if a development allows a greater life span for treated and untreated wood, the consumer has more options to consider in making a decision on what type of wood to use.
The present invention provides an apparatus and method for addressing the problems of rapid wood decay to thereby extend the life of in-ground wood by reducing the rate at which the wood fails due to rot. The invention facilitates improved longevity of in-ground wood and may be used with both treated and untreated wood.
Studies have shown that the portion of an in-ground post that is near the surface of the ground is the most susceptible to rapid wood decay and subsequent failure of the wood. While decay is known to occur throughout in-ground wood where environmental conditions favor microbial action, it is at the “critical decay zone” near the ground surface that comprises the first several inches of the wood that is below the ground surface where wood failure most often occurs. Thus, when an in-ground post fails, the point of failure is most likely in the critical decay zone. Accordingly, one way to effectively increase the longevity of in-ground wood is to protect the portion of the wood that resides in this critical decay zone and to inhibit rot that occurs in this zone.
The present invention is defined by a waterproof collar that surrounds the post below ground level in the critical decay zone and extends to a level just above ground level. The collar defines a barrier between the post and surrounding soil that prevents migration of water across the barrier, prevents microbes in the soil from gaining access to the wood and associated decomposition, and prevents insects from gaining access to the wood. The collar is a linear member that is cut to length wrapped around the post to encircle it. The collar is secured in place around the post and a deformable inwardly projecting upper ridge seals against the post when the collar is sealed in place. Two or more lengths of collar may be overlapped where a wider zone of protection is deemed necessary and an interlock feature of the invention connects the two lengths of collar together securely.
The invention will be better understood and its numerous objects and advantages will be apparent by reference to the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the following drawings.
A first illustrated embodiment of an apparatus 10 for protecting in-ground wood according to the present invention is illustrated in
The invention is described with reference to use of the invention with an in-ground fence post. It will nonetheless be appreciated that the invention is not limited to use with fence posts but instead may be used with any type and size of in-ground wood, such as deck supports, telephone and utility poles, and the like. The posts may have any cross sectional configuration, such as square, round, or irregular.
Collar 14 defines a length of elongate collar material that is adapted to be wrapped around and to thereby surround post 16 immediately above ground level 18 and extending to a point below the ground level. The collar is secured to the post as detailed below. The width of the collar 14 is sufficient to encircle and surround or cover post 16 over the entire width of the “critical decay zone.” As alluded to above, the critical decay zone is that portion of the ground that extends from the ground level a certain distance into the ground where a post is most likely to fail. There is no precise width or depth of the critical decay zone and use of the phrase herein is not meant to be limiting—the depth of the critical decay zone will vary from location to location and depends on many environmental factors, including but not limited to soil conditions and make-up, moisture conditions, bacterial and other microbial life specific to an area, etc. As used herein therefore, the term “critical decay zone” is meant to be a reference to that portion of the ground that extends from near the surface to the depth above which most posts in a given area are likely to fail. In
Nominally, it has been found that the overall width of collar 14 of between about 8 to 16 inches is sufficient to provide protection over the critical decay zone in most locations, with the preferred width about 14 inches. Thus, with reference to
As shown in
With specific reference to
Above vertical section 32 and outwardly projecting ridge 34 is an inwardly and upwardly sloping section, referred to herein as sealing section 38. As detailed below, sealing section 38 defines a seal between collar 14 and the post 16 in the assembled apparatus 10.
Turning now to
For reference purposes, the exterior surface of collar 14 is identified in the drawings with reference number 40—the exterior surface 40 is exposed to the elements when the collar is in place around a post 16. The opposite surface of collar 14, that is, the surface that faces post 16 is identified as interior surface 42 (see
Collar 14 is formed from a flexible, malleable and somewhat elastic material that is waterproof and resistant to degradation from ultraviolet radiation. A thermoplastic elastomer sold under the brand name SANTOPRENE is one material that has found to exhibit good properties for use in collar 14, especially because SANTOPRENE is a fully recyclable material. While a variety of colors may be used for collar 14, the preferred color is black. The collar is provided in an extruded roll and the collar is cut to an appropriate length by the installer; the lineal length of the collar 14 as used with a post 16 is the same as or slightly greater than the circumference of the post where the collar surrounds the post just above the level of ground 18, as shown in
With specific reference to
Returning to
The circumference of post 16 immediately above the level of ground 18 when the post is inserted into the ground is then measured and a length of collar 14 is cut to the length of the circumference, or slightly greater. This is best shown in
A fastener 56 is then wrapped around the collar 14 at circumferential sidewall channel 32 between ridges 30 and 34 and is tightened in place. It will be appreciated that the channel 32 between ridges 30 and 34 defines a circumferential seat for receiving the fastener 56 and that the ridges on opposite sides of the seat both help guide the fastener into place, and help to retain the fastener in position relative to the collar. There are numerous types of fasteners that will work for fastener 56. In
As an alternative method of attaching collar 14 to post 16, the opposite ends 52 and 54 of the collar may be tacked or stapled to the underlying post and the fastener 56 may be omitted.
As best illustrated in
All wooden posts will have irregularities in their outer surfaces. However, because the collar 14 is malleable and flexible, the combination of the collar-to-post contact at seal 38 and the collar-to-post contact beneath the fastener 56, the collar effectively seals around the post at the upper end of the collar.
The collar 14 defines an effective apparatus and method for enhancing the life of in-ground wood because it inhibits the exposure of the post 16 to soil and water over the critical decay zone A. Said another way, the collar 14 defines a barrier to microbes and insects in the soil so that the microbes and insects cannot cause rot and other damage in the wood.
It is known that all wooden posts shrink and swell over time and as environmental conditions change. And as a practical matter, many posts are wet when they are installed and thus are likely to have a lesser circumference as they dry over time. Because the collar 14 is malleable and preferably has at least some elastic properties, it maintains an effective seal around the post even when the post has shrunk. This prevents organic material and organisms from gaining access to the wood beneath the collar. And when a hose clamp fastener 56 is used to attach the collar to the post, the clamp is strong enough to withstand pressure caused by swelling of the post without breaking. More specifically, the seal defined by seal 38 when the collar 14 is applied to a wooden post defines a very effective seal even during expansion and contraction of the wood.
As noted above, in some locations the depth of critical decay zone A may be greater than the overall height dimension (dimension B,
With reference to
The combined height of the interconnected collars 14a and 14b is the distance of dimensions B+C; which the installer will have previously determined to be greater than the width of the critical decay zone A. It will be recognized that the ridge 24 and channel 28/ridge 30 may be placed at locations on sidewall 26 other than those shown in the figures.
In some instances it may be desirable to include a fastener 56 around collar 14 immediately adjacent ridge 24 at the lowermost edge of the collar, for example, when the post 16 is being installed with a “post pounder,” which is a device that pounds the post into the ground without first digging a hole 50—typically the lower end of the post used in these applications may be pointed to ease pounding into the ground. Moreover, in some instances where two collars such as 14a and 14b are being used, it is possible to secure both collars to the post with only a single fastener 56b since that fastener compresses both collars 14a and 14b to the post. In this situation backfilled material will further compress the upper collar 14a against the post 16.
It will be readily apparent that even with the sealing functions provided by sealing section 38 pressed against the post, and the compression of collar material against the post by fastener 56, given the irregularities of the surface of wood posts and the porosity of wood, some external water will be able to make its way into the wood within the collar itself. But just as well, the water that enters is also able to evaporate. Moreover, the water that enters, such as rain water and irrigation water, is not combined with microbes and because the collar 14 defines a barrier between wood and soil, microbes that are in the soil cannot access the wood.
It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that a variety of structural changes may be made to the sleeve and collar relative to the embodiments disclosed above without departing from the nature and scope of the invention.
While the present invention has been described in terms of preferred and illustrated embodiments, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill that the spirit and scope of the invention is not limited to those embodiments, but extend to the various modifications and equivalents as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
381671 | Brown | Apr 1888 | A |
837820 | Folsom et al. | Dec 1906 | A |
877268 | Van Buren | Jan 1908 | A |
1419108 | Bitting | Jun 1922 | A |
1596657 | Heber | Aug 1926 | A |
2385869 | Lane | Oct 1945 | A |
2452047 | Hamblin | Oct 1948 | A |
2724156 | Shaw | Nov 1955 | A |
2756172 | Kidd | Jul 1956 | A |
2928411 | Johnson | Mar 1960 | A |
3118644 | Wernig | Jan 1964 | A |
3321924 | Liddell | May 1967 | A |
3488040 | Dickson | Jan 1970 | A |
3592428 | McFarlane | Jul 1971 | A |
3890795 | Maurer | Jun 1975 | A |
3997149 | Stout | Dec 1976 | A |
4023374 | Colbert et al. | May 1977 | A |
4068483 | Papworth | Jan 1978 | A |
4203476 | Vitellaro | May 1980 | A |
4283161 | Evans et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4543757 | Cosgrove | Oct 1985 | A |
4714280 | Winterhoff | Dec 1987 | A |
4779389 | Landers | Oct 1988 | A |
4799340 | Lichau et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5044821 | Johnsen | Sep 1991 | A |
5060416 | Rohde | Oct 1991 | A |
5222325 | Angus | Jun 1993 | A |
5311713 | Goodrich | May 1994 | A |
5435667 | Strange | Jul 1995 | A |
5479741 | Underwood | Jan 1996 | A |
5516236 | Williams et al. | May 1996 | A |
5571229 | Fitzsimmons et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591263 | Chin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5685522 | Randolph, Jr. | Nov 1997 | A |
5704580 | Peery, Jr. | Jan 1998 | A |
5752349 | Fitzsimmons et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765880 | Goddard | Jun 1998 | A |
5775839 | Mazzer | Jul 1998 | A |
5832675 | Zuares | Nov 1998 | A |
5901525 | Doeringer et al. | May 1999 | A |
6041559 | Schickert et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6062342 | Dobson | May 2000 | A |
6073416 | Peter | Jun 2000 | A |
6098351 | Mills | Aug 2000 | A |
6244781 | Roller | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256961 | Byrnes | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257557 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6364575 | Bradley et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391414 | Hjertman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
7275349 | Auman | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7325790 | Lee | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7470091 | Scholl | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7762016 | Davidson | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7827762 | Griffiths | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8256184 | Lowe | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8485493 | Wells et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8533991 | Lais et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20060150572 | Rawson-Harris | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070193203 | Prenn | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080072510 | Wells et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090025336 | Prenn | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20120011804 | Winterhalter et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130042547 | Carhart | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Copending U.S. Appl. No. 13/214,171, having the same inventor. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130333324 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |