Apparatus and method for reconfiguring antenna contoured beams by switching between shaped-surface subreflectors

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6239763
  • Patent Number
    6,239,763
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 29, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 29, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A configurable antenna includes a main reflector and at least two subreflectors. Each of the subreflectors is configurably disposed relative to the main reflector to provide an active subreflector for reflecting radiation between the main reflector and a point off of the main reflector in a desired beam pattern. Each subreflector typically has a different shape and may be moved into the active subreflector position to produce a desired beam pattern during operation of the antenna. The antenna further includes a horn disposed at a point off of the main reflector for feeding signals to the reflectors and for receiving signals from the reflectors. The configurable antenna is typically mounted on a satellite system which itself, or in response to instructions or commands from a ground station, reconfigures the antenna to provide the desired beam shape.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to antennas and beam forming and more particularly to techniques for dynamically reconfiguring antenna contoured beams by switching between shaped-surface subreflectors.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Antennas are designed to project beams of a certain shape for both transmitting and receiving radio waves. For example, geo-stationary satellite mounted antennas may be configured to project a beam that is roughly the shape of a geographic region, such as a state within the United States. Thus, the satellite antenna is configured to transmit radio waves to and receive radio waves from the geographic region on the earth's surface defined by the beam.




From time to time it may be desirable to change the shape of the beam that a given antenna transmits and receives in. The change may be necessitated by a change in the geographic distribution of demand for a communications service provided via the antenna, by a need to transfer the satellite to a different orbital location, or by a need to respond to an emergency. When the antenna is mounted on a satellite, there is no economically feasible way to retrieve and reconfigure the antenna. Therefore, it would be desirable to provide dynamically configurable antennas that are capable of being reconfigured to form beams of different shapes from a remote location.




There are at least two conventional techniques for reconfiguring the shape of a beam produced by an antenna. In the first technique, an array of horns is configured to transmit/receive via a reflector. In the case of transmission, for example, by varying the amplitude and phase excitation of each horn in the array of horns, the beam shape may be changed to a desired shape.




In the second technique a single or multiple horns are configured to transmit and receive via a reflector. The reflector is either shaped or unshaped. In its unshaped configuration, the reflector is a paraboloid. In its shaped configuration, the reflector may be shaped to reflect radio waves to produce the desired shape. To make the antenna configurable, the reflector is made deformable and includes motors or servos coupled to its non-reflective side. The motors or servos may be commanded to urge the reflector into different shapes thus producing a corresponding change in shape of the transmitted and received beams.




Each of these conventional techniques has disadvantages. In the case of the array of horns, the array is heavy which may add substantially to launch costs in the case of a satellite based antenna. The array of horns also takes up a substantial amount of space compared to other antenna configurations, particularly where 100 or more horns are required for the array. Available space on a satellite for mounting apparati is scarce, particularly as a goal of satellite design is miniaturization. Therefore, this conventional technique may not be practical for many if not most satellite communication applications.




In the case of using motors or servos to urge a reflector into different shapes to produce a corresponding change in beam shape, this technique is clumsy. Moreover, it may be expensive, inaccurate, heavy by comparison to other antenna configurations and prone to failure.




It would be desirable to provide a new technique for remotely reconfiguring an antenna to form beams of different shapes. It would further be desirable for the new technique to be inexpensive, light weight and take up correspondingly less space on a satellite than conventional techniques.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




According to the present invention, a method and apparatus provide an antenna that is remotely configurable to change the shape of a beam associated with the antenna.




The configurable antenna includes a main reflector and at least two subreflectors. Each of the subreflectors is configurably disposed relative to the main reflector to provide an active subreflector for reflecting radiation between the main reflector and a point off of the main reflector in a desired beam pattern. Each subreflector typically has a different shape and may be moved into the active subreflector position to produce a desired beam pattern during operation of the antenna.




The antenna further includes a feed element such as a horn, helix, dipole, microstrip or a small array of similar feed elements disposed at a point off of the main reflector for feeding signals to the reflectors and for receiving signals from the reflectors. The configurable antenna is typically mounted on a satellite system which itself, or in response to instructions or commands from a ground station, reconfigures the antenna to provide the desired beam shape.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES




The above described objects, features and advantages will be more fully understood with reference to the detailed description and appended figures, where:





FIG. 1

depicts a configurable antenna using an array of feed horns according to the prior art.





FIG. 2

depicts a configurable antenna using a deformable reflector according to the prior art.





FIG. 3

depicts an unconfigurable, dual-reflector antenna according to the prior art.





FIG. 4

depicts a configurable, dual-reflector antenna having multiple subreflectors movably disposed relative to the main reflector according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 5

depicts positioning of the active subreflector in a Gregorian configuration according to the present invention.





FIG. 6

depicts positioning of the active subreflector in a Cassegrain configuration according to the present invention.





FIG. 7

depicts an antenna configuration having multiple feed elements according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 8

depicts a functional view of an embodiment of a satellite system including the present invention.





FIG. 9

illustratively depicts a technique for mounting a configurable antenna onto a satellite according to an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 10

depicts an alternative mounting technique in which the satellite includes a recess for receiving the configurable antenna.





FIG. 11

depicts an embodiment of the configurable antenna as a single assembly according to the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

depicts an arrangement of an antenna


10


according to the prior art for generating a configurable beam. The antenna


10


includes a main reflector


12


, an array of horns


14


, a feed network


18


and a transponder


20


. The transponder


20


generates signals for transmission via the antenna


10


and also receives signals from the antenna


10


. The transponder is coupled to the feed network


18


. The feed network


18


in turn is coupled to an array of horns


14


which are generally arranged along a feed plane


16


. The horns


14


are waveguides that project signals received from the feed network


18


onto the main reflector


12


. The feed network


18


is configurable and may be configured to change the amplitude and phase excitation of individual horns


14


within the array of horns. By changing the amplitude and phase excitation of each horn


14


in delivering signals from the transponder


20


, the shape of a beam carrying the transmitted signals also is changed. The beam issuing forth from the array of horns


14


then reflects off of the main reflector


12


toward a target. The beam is thus projected at the target and may be changed by changing the amplitude and phase excitation of the feed network.




Although configurable, the antenna


10


has several disadvantages. Most notably, the array of feed horns


14


is heavy and takes up a substantial amount of space on the satellite as compared to other antenna configurations. This is particularly problematic where the array must include more than 50 to 100 horns


14


. A reconfigurable feed network is complex, expensive, and may have to include redundant elements to ensure reliable operation.





FIG. 2

depicts an alternate scheme for shaping beams issuing from an antenna


10


. According to this scheme, the main reflector


12


is deformable under urging by motors or servos (not shown). The deformation is, in theory, controlled to produce different desired beam shapes. The main reflector may be used with a single horn


14


and transponder


20


, without the need for an elaborate feed network to excite an array. This technique may be clumsy and inaccurate for several reasons. First, the surface deformation of the main reflector must be elastic (fully recoverable to initial state). Therefore, the range and rate of surface modification is severely limited. Second, a mesh material may have to be used, which restricts polarization and/or frequency of the signal. Third, the motors or servos require a sturdy mounting structure and a control network which may require a lot of space.





FIG. 3

depicts a fixed beam shape, dual reflector antenna


10


according to the prior art. The antenna


10


includes a main reflector, a subreflector


30


, a horn


14


and a transponder


20


. During a transmit operation, the transponder


20


transmits a signal via the horn


14


to the subreflector


30


. The subreflector reflects the signal from the horn to the main reflector where the signal emanates as a transmitted beam toward a target. During a receive operation, the main reflector


12


receives incident radiation from a field of view. Only incident radiation that is within a receive beam shape will then be reflected from the main reflector


12


, off of the subreflector


30


toward a communicating end of the horn


14


. The transponder in turn receives the signal from another communicating end of the horn


14


. The subreflector


30


is an ellipsoid for Gregorian optics and a hyperboloid for Cassegrain optics.





FIG. 4

depicts a configurable beam antenna according to the present invention. The antenna


100


includes a main reflector


102


, a plurality of subreflectors


104


and a feed element


110


. The main reflector


102


may be an unshaped parabolic mirror in which case it has the appearance of a dish in three dimensions. Alternatively, the main reflector may be a shaped mirror, such as a spherical, hyperbolic, ellipsoid or irregular shape where irregularities are introduced in order to provide a particular beam shape. The main reflector


102


has a reflective surface oriented toward a field of view and the subreflector. The inner surface of the main reflector


102


may be convex or concave.




The plurality of subreflectors


104


are movably disposed relative to the main reflector


102


. Each of the plurality of subreflectors


104


may have the same or a different shape in order to produce a different shaped beam. During use of the antenna, at least one of the plurality of subreflectors is an active subreflector


106


and therefore communicates radiation between the main reflector


102


and the feed element


110


. Each of the subreflectors


104


may have any convenient shape, including ellipsoid, hyperboloid, paraboloid or irregularly shaped where irregularities are chosen to create a desired beam shape.




In order to configure or re-configure the antenna


100


, the active subreflector


106


is moved relative to the main reflector so that it no longer communicates radiation between the main reflector


102


and the feed element


110


. Subsequently, a different subreflector


104


is moved relative to the main reflector


102


so that it becomes the active subreflector


106


that communicates radiation between the main reflector


102


and the feed element


110


. In a preferred embodiment of the invention each of the subreflectors


104


has a different shape that is chosen, along with the size, shape and distance from the main reflector


102


to produce different beam shapes.




Any technique for movably disposing the subreflectors


104


relative to the main reflector


102


is contemplated. For example, in one embodiment of the invention, three subreflectors


104


are mounted around a common axis of rotation


112


as shown in

FIG. 4. A

single-axis gimbal may be used as the common-axis of rotation


112


as shown. The gimbal may be driven by a motor coupled thereto which rotates the gimbal in order to change the active subreflector


106


. Alternatively, the common axis of rotation


112


may be a shaft of a motor to which the subreflectors


104


are coupled. The coupling may be direct or through a gearing arrangement. Many other techniques may be used. For example, one or more movable arms may be configured to move an appropriate one of a set of subreflectors


104


into the active subreflector


106


position. In this embodiment, one or more subreflectors may be rigidly attached to one or more arms. Alternatively, one or more arms may be configured to release and attach subreflectors in response to commands. In still another embodiment, a track having a movable portion such as a belt, strip or chain to which subreflectors


104


are attached may be used to move appropriate ones of the subreflectors


104


into the active subreflector


106


position.




In any of these embodiments, once the desired subreflector


104


is moved into the active subreflector


106


position, the active subreflector may be locked into position to ensure alignment stability. This may be done in any convenient manner including using a gimbal holding torque which is a well known technique. Alternatives may include spring loaded mechanisms or the resistance to rotation of the motor shaft and gears while in a stationary position.




In a preferred embodiment of the invention, positioning of the active subreflector


106


is done to so that one focus of the active subreflector


106


coincides with the focus of the main reflector


12


and so that the other focus of the active reflector


106


coincides with a communicating end of the feed element


110


. This is shown in

FIG. 5

for the case of Gregorian optics and in

FIG. 6

for the case of Cassegrain optics.





FIG. 7

depicts an alternate embodiment of the invention in which multiple feed elements


110


, or a single movable feed element


110


, are/is positioned relative to a plurality of configurable subreflectors


104


. Each of the plurality of positions for the feed element(s)


110


are chosen so that a communicating end of the desired feed element


110


is at the focus of an active subreflector


106


within the plurality of subreflectors


104


. This embodiment may be preferred in order to minimize the motion required to move each subreflector


104


into an active position relative to the main reflector


102


and each feed element


110


. The feed element


110


is typically a feed horn. However, the feed element


110


may also be a helix, dipole or microstrip or an array of horns, helices, dipoles or microstrips.





FIG. 8

depicts a functional view of an embodiment of a satellite system


200


incorporating the present invention. The satellite system


200


includes a command and control unit


202


coupled to a transponder


204


and a power system


206


and a telemetry unit


208


. The transponder unit


204


is in turn coupled to the configurable antenna


100


.




The power system


206


, which may include solar arrays, batteries and/or a nuclear power generator, generates, stores and distributes power to all of the units of the satellite. The telemetry unit


208


stabilizes and keeps the satellite


208


and its configurable antenna


210


properly aligned. Stabilization may be accomplished in a well known manner using spin stabilization, three axis stabilization or other techniques including magnetic torque rods.




The command and control unit


202


is essentially a computer and communications system which runs program instructions to carry out the mission of the satellite. The command and control unit


202


may receive and upload instructions to run or commands to execute from a ground station. For example, the command and control unit


202


may receive a command from a ground station to reconfigure the configurable antenna


100


to bring a different subreflector


104


into the active position. In response, the command and control unit


202


may command or control the motor


114


of the antenna


100


to move a desired one of the subreflectors


104


into the active position


106


. The result is a change in the shape of the beam transmitted to and received from the field of view of the antenna


100


. The motor


114


typically includes a motor control system, well known in the art, that includes a feed back loop with position, velocity, and/or acceleration sensors. The control system receives the commanded position and controls movement of the motor shaft to reach the desired position.




The transponder receives signals for transmission from the command and control unit


202


, amplifies the signals and outputs the signals to a communicating end of the feed element


110


for transmission via the reflectors


106


and


102


to the field of view of the antenna


100


in the desired beam pattern. The transponder


204


also may receive signals from the desired beam pattern emanating from the field of view and output those signals to the command and control unit


202


for signal processing or other applications as pursuant to the mission configuration of the satellite system


200


.




There are numerous ways of mounting the antenna


100


for use in communications. Any convenient mounting technique may be used. For example the antenna


100


may be a single assembly that is fixedly or configurably mounted to a structure for use in communications. Alternatively, the antenna


100


may be mounted as separate parts to a structure for use in communications, where each of the separate parts may be movably disposed relative to each other or the structure. The structure itself may be disposed on land or may be part of a vehicle such as a satellite, airplane or automobile.





FIG. 9

illustratively depicts a technique for mounting a configurable antenna


100


onto a satellite


120


. The satellite


120


has a deck


121


that, during orbit, is oriented generally facing a target, such as the earth. On the deck


121


, individual parts of the configurable antenna


100


are mounted. Referring to

FIG. 9

, the main reflector


102


is mounted to the deck


121


via a support structure


122


. The support structure


122


may mount the reflector


102


in a fixed position relative to the deck


121


when the support structure is a rigid member. Alternatively, the support structure may mount the reflector


102


in a movable position relative to the deck


121


, such as when the support structure is a single or multiple axis gimbal.




The motor


114


may be mounted to the deck


121


and may include a rotating shaft


115


coupled to a bar


124


at ends of which subreflectors


104


are disposed. The motor


114


may be part of a multiple axis gimbal in which case the shaft


115


may also be movable relative to the deck


121


off of the axis of rotation of the shaft


115


.




The feed element


110


is mounted to the deck


121


by the arm


126


. The arm may be fixed or movably disposed relative to the deck


121


. Each of the parts that participate in the mounting, such as the motor


114


, shaft


115


, bar


124


, support structure


122


and arm


126


are positioned on the deck


121


and relative to each other and to the subreflectors


104


, main reflector


102


and the feed element


110


to preserve the geometry of the antenna


100


as described with reference to

FIGS. 4-7

. Moreover, each of the parts may be secured to each other or the deck


121


(or other part of the satellite


120


) in any convenient way, including by welding, bolting, riveting, using adhesives or by being integrally formed.





FIG. 10

depicts an alternative mounting technique in which the satellite


120


includes a recess


150


. In the recess


150


, all or parts of the antenna


100


may be mounted in any convenient manner. The recess


150


permits the antenna


100


to be mounted in a way that minimizes the volume of the satellite


120


to facilitate launching the satellite


120


on a launch vehicle. When the antenna


100


is mounted in separate parts, the main reflector


102


may be movably mounted, for example, to a face of the satellite


120


as shown such that it may be unfurled for use as depicted in FIG.


10


. The mounting of the main reflector to permit unfurling may be accomplished in any convenient manner, including using a gimbal or hinge.





FIG. 11

depicts an embodiment of the antenna


100


as a single assembly. In this embodiment, the main reflector


102


, the motor


114


and the feed element


110


are each mounted to an arm


155


. In this arrangement the arm


155


and attachments thereto may be configured in any desired manner consistent with the geometry of the antenna


100


as described with reference to

FIGS. 4-7

.




Although specific embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed, it will be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art that changes may be made to those embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, while embodiments have been described in which the subreflectors are moved and the main reflector remains fixed, the main reflector may be moved, instead or in addition to the movement of the subreflectors, to bring different subreflectors into the active position. The language “moving (configuring or re-configuring) the subreflectors relative to the main reflector . . . ” is intended to encompass these variations.



Claims
  • 1. A configurable antenna, comprising:a main reflector; a feed element; and at least two subreflectors, each of the subreflectors being configurably disposed relative to the main reflector to provide a selected active subreflector, among the at least two subreflectors, for reflecting radiation between the main reflector and the feed element in a desired beam; wherein the selected active subreflector changes based on a configuration of the antenna.
  • 2. The antenna according to claim 1, wherein the feed element is a horn.
  • 3. The antenna according to claim 1, wherein the feed element is a helix.
  • 4. The antenna according to claim 1, wherein each of the subreflectors has a different shape.
  • 5. The antenna according to claim 1, further comprising:a single axis gimbal for mounting the subreflectors to a satellite; and a motor, coupled to the gimbal and a satellite, for rotating the subreflectors about the single axis to change the configuration of the antenna.
  • 6. The antenna according to claim 1, wherein the main reflector is shaped to provide a desired beam.
  • 7. The antenna according to claim 1, further comprising a motor rigidly disposed relative to the main reflector, the motor including a rotatable shaft coupled to the at least two subreflectors, the motor rotating the shaft to urge the at least two subreflectors into desired configurations.
  • 8. A method of providing a configurable beam antenna, comprising the steps of:providing a main reflector; providing a feed element; providing at least two subreflectors, each of the subreflectors being configurably disposed relative to the main reflector to provide a selected active subreflector, among the at least two subreflectors, for reflecting radiation between the main reflector and the feed element; wherein the selected active subreflector changes based on a configuration of the antenna.
  • 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the feed element is a horn.
  • 10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the feed element is a helix.
  • 11. The method according to claim 8, further comprising the step of:mounting the main reflector to a satellite system.
  • 12. A configurable, satellite-based communications system comprising:a main reflector disposed on a satellite; a feed element; and at least two subreflectors, each of the subreflectors being configurably disposed relative to the main reflector to provide a selected active subreflector, among the at least two subreflectors, for reflecting radiation between the main reflector and the feed element; wherein the selected active subreflector changes based on a configuration of the antenna.
  • 13. The configurable communications system according to claim 12, further comprising:a transponder for transmitting signals to and receiving signals from a second communicating end of the feed element.
  • 14. The configurable communications system according to claim 12, wherein the feed element is a horn.
  • 15. The configurable communications system according to claim 12, wherein the feed element is a helix.
  • 16. The configurable communications system according to claim 12, further comprising a motor rigidly disposed relative to the main reflector, the motor including a rotatable shaft coupled to the at least two subreflectors, the motor rotating the shaft to urge the at least two subreflectors into desired configurations.
  • 17. The configurable communications system according to claim 12, further comprising:a transponder for transmitting signals to and receiving signals from a second communicating end of the feed element; a motor rigidly disposed relative to the main reflector, the motor including a rotatable shaft coupled to the at least two subreflectors, the motor rotating the shaft to urge the at least two subreflectors into desired configurations; and a command and control unit, coupled to the transponder and the motor, for commanding the motor to change the desired configurations and for controlling the transponder.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4260993 Aubry et al. Apr 1981
4535338 Ohm Aug 1985
5444455 Louzir et al. Aug 1995
5485168 Parekh Jan 1996
5526008 Meserole et al. Jun 1996