This invention relates to fingerprint sensing technology, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for reducing the effects of noise in fingerprint sensing circuits.
Fingerprint sensing technology is increasingly recognized as a reliable, non-intrusive way to verify individual identity. Fingerprints, like various other biometric characteristics, are based on unalterable personal characteristics and thus are believed to be more reliable when identifying individuals. The potential applications for fingerprints sensors are myriad. For example, electronic fingerprint sensors may be used to provide access control in stationary applications, such as security checkpoints. Electronic fingerprint sensors may also be used to provide access control in portable applications, such as portable computers, personal data assistants (PDAs), cell phones, gaming devices, navigation devices, information appliances, data storage devices, and the like. Accordingly, some applications, particularly portable applications, may require electronic fingerprint sensing systems that are compact, highly reliable, and inexpensive.
Various electronic fingerprint sensing methods, techniques, and devices have been proposed or are currently under development. For example, optical and capacitive fingerprint sensing devices are currently on the market or under development. Like a digital camera, optical technology utilizes visible light to capture a digital image. In particular, optical technology may use a light source to illuminate an individual's finger while a charge-coupled device (CCD) captures an analog image. This analog image may then be converted to a digital image.
There are generally two types of capacitive fingerprint sensing technologies: passive and active. Both types of capacitive technologies utilize the same principles of capacitance to generate fingerprint images. Passive capacitive technology typically utilizes an array of plates to apply an electrical current to the finger. The voltage discharge is then measured through the finger. Fingerprint ridges will typically have a substantially greater discharge potential than valleys, which may have little or no discharge.
Active capacitive technology is similar to passive technology, but may require initial excitation of the epidermal skin layer of the finger by applying a voltage. Active capacitive sensors, however, may be adversely affected by dry or worn minutia, which may fail to drive the sensor's output amplifier. By contrast, passive sensors are typically capable of producing images regardless of contact resistance and require significantly less power.
Although each of the fingerprint sensing technologies described above may generate satisfactory fingerprint images, each may be adversely affected by noise, interference, and other effects. For example, capacitive sensors may be particularly susceptible to noise and parasitic capacitive coupling, which may degrade the quality of the acquired fingerprint image. Accordingly, it would be an advance in the art to reduce the effects of noise, parasitic capacitive coupling, and other effects in capacitive-type fingerprint sensing circuits.
In order that the advantages of the invention will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific examples illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical examples of the invention and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
The invention has been developed in response to the present state of the art, and in particular, in response to the problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully solved by currently available fingerprint sensors. Accordingly, the invention has been developed to provide novel apparatus and methods for reducing noise in fingerprint sensing circuits. The features and advantages of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims and their equivalents, and also any subsequent claims or amendments presented, or may be learned by practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
Consistent with the foregoing, an apparatus for reducing noise in fingerprint sensing circuits is disclosed in one embodiment of the invention as including a fingerprint sensing area onto which a user can apply a fingerprint. An analog front end is coupled to the fingerprint sensing area and is configured to generate an analog response signal. An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) samples the analog response signal and converts the sample to a digital value, which may be received by a digital device such as a processor or CPU. To reduce the amount of the noise that is present in the analog response signal and therefore reflected in the digital value, the digital device may be shut down while the ADC is sampling the analog response signal.
In selected embodiments, the digital device is shut down by turning off a clock signal to the digital device. In other embodiments, the digital device is shut down by disabling the digital device or turning off power to the digital device. In certain embodiments, the digital device is configured to shut down some interval prior to the time the ADC samples the analog response signal. The interval may be selected to allow any noise to settle out of the system prior to sampling the analog response signal.
In another embodiment in accordance with the invention, a method for reducing noise in a fingerprint sensing circuit may include providing a fingerprint sensing area onto which a user can apply a fingerprint. An analog response signal associated with finger activity over the fingerprint sensing area may then be generated. The method may further include sampling the analog response signal and converting the sample to a digital value. This digital value may then be received by a digital device. To reduce the amount of noise that is present in the analog response signal during sampling and therefore reflected in the digital value, the method may further include shutting down the digital device while sampling the analog response signal.
In another embodiment in accordance with the invention, a method for reducing noise in fingerprint sensing circuits includes providing a fingerprint sensing area onto which a user can apply a fingerprint and generating an analog response signal in response to finger activity over the fingerprint sensing area. The analog response signal is then sampled and converted to a digital value. This digital value may then be received or processed by a CPU. To reduce the amount of the noise that is present in the analog response signal during sampling and reflected in the digital value, the method may further include turning off a clock signal to the CPU while sampling the analog response signal.
It will be readily understood that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the Figures herein, may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the systems and methods of the present invention, as represented in the Figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is merely representative of selected embodiments of the invention.
Some of the functional units or method steps described in this specification may be embodied or implemented as modules. For example, a module may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices, or the like.
Modules may also be implemented in software for execution by various types of processors. An identified module of executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve the stated purpose of the module.
Indeed, a module of executable code could be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
The illustrated embodiments of the invention will be best understood by reference to the drawings, wherein like parts are designated by like numerals throughout. The following description is intended only by way of example, and simply illustrates certain selected embodiments of apparatus and methods that are consistent with the invention as claimed herein.
Referring to
In certain embodiments, the fingerprint sensing area 12 may include an array of transmitting elements 16, such as a linear array of transmitting elements 16, to assist in scanning lines of “pixels” as a fingerprint is swiped across the fingerprint sensing area 12. In this embodiment, the transmitting elements 16 are shown as a linear array of conductive traces 16 connected to a fingerprint sensing circuit 18. The transmitting elements 16 are not drawn to scale and may include several hundred transmitting elements 16 arranged across the width of a fingerprint, one transmitting element 16 per pixel. A fingerprint image may be generated by scanning successive lines of pixels as a finger is swiped over the array. These lines may then be assembled to generate a fingerprint image, similar to the way a fax image is generated using line-by-line scanning.
In certain embodiments, the transmitting elements 16 are configured to sequentially emit, or burst, a probing signal, one after the other. As will be explained in more detail hereafter, the probing signal may include a burst of probing pulses, such as a burst of square waves. This probing signal may be sensed on the receiving end by a receiving element 20. Like the transmitting elements 16, the receiving element 20 is shown as a conductive trace 20 connected to the fingerprint sensing circuit 18. Although shown as a single receiving element 20, in other embodiments, pairs of receiving elements 20 may be used to differentially cancel out noise.
At the receiving element 20, a response signal may be generated in response to the probing signal. The magnitude of the response signal may depend on factors such as whether a finger is present over the fingerprint sensing area 12 and, more particularly, whether a ridge or valley of a fingerprint is immediately over the gap 22 between a transmitting element 16 and the receiving element 20. The magnitude of the signal generated at the receiving element 20 may be directly related to the RF impedance of a finger ridge or valley placed over the gap 22 between the corresponding transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20.
By using a single receiving element 20 (or a small number of receiving elements 20) and a comparatively larger number of transmitting elements 16, a receiver that is coupled to the receiving element 20 may be designed to be very high quality and with a much better dynamic range than would be possible using an array of multiple receiving elements. This design differs from many conventional fingerprint sensors, which may employ a single large transmitting element with a large array of receiving elements and receivers. Nevertheless, the apparatus and methods described herein are not limited to the illustrated transmitter and receiver design. Indeed, the apparatus and methods disclosed herein may be used with fingerprint sensors using a small number of transmitting elements and a relatively large number of receiving elements, a large number of transmitting elements and a relatively small number of receiving element, or a roughly equal number of transmitting and receiving elements.
As shown in
Referring generally to
In selected embodiments, a user's finger may be swiped across the side of the substrate 30 opposite the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20. Thus, the substrate 30 may electrically and mechanically isolates a user's finger from the transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20, thereby providing some degree of protection from electrostatic discharge (ESD) and mechanical abrasion.
The capacitive coupling between the transmitting element 16 and the receiving element 20 may change depending on whether a fingerprint ridge or valley is immediately over the gap 22. This is because the dielectric constant of a finger is typically ten to twenty times greater than the dielectric constant of air. The dielectric constant of the ridges of a finger may vary significantly from finger to finger and person to person, explaining the significant range of dielectric constants. Because a fingerprint ridge has a dielectric constant that differs significantly from that of air, the capacitive coupling between the transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20 may vary significantly depending on whether a ridge or valley is present over the sensor gap 22.
For example, referring to
Referring to
The output from the band pass filter 52 may then be supplied to an envelope detector 54, which may detect the envelope of the response signal. This envelope may provide a baseband signal, the amplitude of which may vary depending on whether a ridge or valley is over the sensor gap 22. The baseband signal may be passed to a low pass filter 56 to remove unwanted higher frequencies. The variable-gain amplifier 50, band pass filter 52, envelope detector 54, low pass filter 56, as well as other analog components may be collectively referred to as an analog front end 57.
The output from the low pass filter 56 may be passed to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 58, which may convert the analog output to a digital value. The ADC 58 may have, for example, a resolution of 8 to 12 bits and may be capable of resolving the output of the low pass filter 56 to 256 to 4096 values. The magnitude of the digital value may be proportional to the signal strength measured at the receiving element 20. Likewise, as explained above, the signal strength may be related to the capacitive coupling between the transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20, which may depend on the RF impedance of the feature over the sensor gap 22.
The resulting digital value may be passed to a CPU 60 or other digital components, which may eventually pass digital fingerprint data to a host system 62. The host system 62, in selected embodiments, may process the fingerprint data using various matching algorithms in order to authenticate a user's fingerprint.
In addition to processing the digital data, the CPU 60 may control the gain of the variable-gain amplifier 50 using a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 64. The gain may be adjusted to provide a desired output power or amplitude in the presence of variable sensing conditions. For example, in selected embodiments, the gain of the variable-gain amplifier 50 may be adjusted to compensate for variations in the impedance of different fingers. In selected embodiments, the CPU 60 may also control the operation of the scanning logic 42.
Referring to
A pixel clock signal 72 may control the amount of time each transmitting element 16 is transmitting the probing signal 48. For example, a rising edge 74a of the pixel clock signal 72 may cause a first transmitting element 16 in the array to begin emitting the probing signal 48. The next rising edge 74b may cause the first transmitting element 16 to cease transmitting and cause the next transmitting element 16 to begin emitting the probing signal 48. This process may continue for each transmitting element 16 in the array to generate a “line” of fingerprint data. Successive lines may be scanned in this manner and the lines may be combined to generate a fingerprint image as previously discussed. The interval between the rising edges 74a, 74b may be referred to as the “pixel period” 76.
Analog response signals 78a, 78b may represent the signal that is output from the analog front end 57 described in
As shown, the first analog response signal 78a may initially have a magnitude 80a when a ridge is placed over the sensor gap 22 (reflecting greater capacitive coupling between the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20). When the ridge is removed from the sensor gap 22 (i.e., a valley is placed over the sensor gap 22), the magnitude 82a of the signal 78a may become smaller (reflecting reduced capacitive coupling between the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20). The gradual transition between the peak magnitudes 80a, 82a may be the result of time constants of analog components in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18. That is, due to the frequency response of analog components, such as band pass and low pass filters 52, 56, some time may be needed for the signal 78a to settle at a new level. After the signal 78a has transitioned from one peak value 80a to the other 82a, the signal 78a may reach a substantially steady state level 84a. Sampling is ideally conducted during this period.
Similarly, the second analog response signal 78b may initially have a magnitude 80b when a valley is placed over the sensor gap 22 (reflecting lower capacitive coupling between the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20). When a ridge is placed over the sensor gap 22, the magnitude 82b of the signal 78b may become larger (reflecting increased capacitive coupling between the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20). The signal may transition between the peak magnitudes 80b, 82b, reflecting time constants in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18, after which the signal 78b may reach a substantially steady state level 84b.
An ADC clock signal 86 may be used to clock the ADC 58 in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18. In this example, the ADC 58 uses three clock cycles 88 to sample the voltage of the analog response signal 78a, 78b and eight clock cycles to convert the sample to a digital value. In certain embodiments, the ADC 58 may open a gate and store the sample on a capacitor for about three clock cycles. After the three clock cycles have passed, the ADC 58 may close the gate and convert the sample to a digital value. In certain embodiments, the ADC 58 may use one clock cycle to generate each bit of the digital value. The number of clock cycles used for sampling and converting is presented only by way of example and is not intended to be limiting. As shown, sampling may be performed during the steady state period 84a, 84b (i.e., the peak response period) to generate the most accurate sample.
In selected embodiments, an ADC convert pulse signal 92 may be used to instruct the ADC 58 to begin sampling. For example, when an edge, such as a rising edge 94, of the ADC convert pulse signal 92 is detected by the ADC 58, the ADC 58 may begin to sample the analog response signal 78a, 78b and convert the sample to a digital value.
A CPU clock signal 96 may be used to clock the CPU 60 and other digital components in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18. As shown, in selected embodiments, the clock signal 96 may be configured to operate during an initial portion of the pixel period 76 (the period of minimum noise sensitivity) but may be shut down during the remainder of the pixel period 76. This may be performed to reduce system noise (e.g., switching noise produced by the CPU 60 or other digital components when they change state) in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18 when the ADC 58 is sampling the analog response signal 78. This will ideally reduce the amount of noise that is reflected in the digital value, allowing a clearer fingerprint image to be generated.
The signal 98 may represent noise that is generated in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18 when the CPU clock 96 is turned on. By shutting off the CPU clock 96 at an appropriate time, noise may be allowed to settle out of the system prior to sampling the analog response signal 78. Thus, in selected embodiments, the CPU clock 96 may be shut down some interval prior to the time the ADC 58 samples the analog response signal 78 in order to allow time for noise to settle out of the system.
In alternative embodiments, instead of shutting down the CPU clock 96 while sampling the analog response signal 78, other actions may be taken to reduce noise in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18. For example, the CPU 60 itself may be disabled or shut down when sampling the analog response signal 78, and then re-enabled or re-started once sampling is complete.
Referring to
As mentioned, the PLL output 70 may be divided to generate clocking signals to clock different components in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18. For example, in selected embodiments, a frequency divider 106 may divide the PLL output frequency 70 to generate a probing signal frequency 108, in this example 18 MHz. This signal 108 may be divided further to generate the pixel clock signal 72, in this example a 1 MHz signal.
Similarly, the PLL output 70 may be divided to provide clock signals 96, 86 for the CPU 60 and ADC 58, respectively. In this example, a divider 112 may divide the PLL output 70 to generate a CPU clock signal 96, in this example a 48 MHz signal 96. Similarly, a divider 114 may divide the PLL output 70 to generate an ADC clock signal 86, in this example a 12 MHz signal 86.
In selected embodiments, the CPU clock 112 and ADC clock 114 may receive input from the pixel clock 72. For example, a rising or falling edge of the pixel clock 72 may cause the CPU clock 112 and ADC clock 114 to begin outputting the CPU clock signal 96 and ADC clock signal 86, respectively. In selected embodiments, the CPU clock 112 and ADC clock 114 are programmable with respect to how many clock pulses to output and a delay before outputting the clock pulses. Thus, when the CPU clock 112 and ADC clock 114 receive a a rising or falling edge from the pixel clock 110, they may output a specified number of clock pulses starting at a specified time as determined by the delay. In this way, the CPU clock 96 may be shut down during selected portions of the pixel period 76, and more particularly while the ADC 58 is sampling the analog response signal 78.
It should be recognized that the components and frequencies illustrated in
Similarly, apparatus and methods in accordance with the invention are applicable to a wide variety of fingerprint sensing technologies are not limited to the fingerprint sensing technology disclosed herein. Indeed, the apparatus and methods may be applicable to a wide variety of capacitive, optical, ultrasonic, and other fingerprint sensing technologies where noise may be a concern. Each of these technologies may benefit from reduced noise by turning off clocks to various components during sampling, or by shutting down or disabling selected components during sampling. Thus, apparatus and methods are not limited to any specific type of fingerprint sensor but may be applicable to a wide variety of fingerprint sensing technologies.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described examples are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 13/372,153, filed Feb. 13, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,520,913 B2 issued Aug. 27, 2013, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 12/098,367, filed Apr. 4, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,116,540, issued Feb. 14, 2012, both entitled “Apparatus and Method for Reducing Noise in Fingerprint Sensing Circuits,” which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and to which application we claim priority under 35 USC §120.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3593319 | Barber | Jul 1971 | A |
4151512 | Rigannati et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4225850 | Chang et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4310827 | Asi | Jan 1982 | A |
4353056 | Tsikos | Oct 1982 | A |
4405829 | Rivest et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4525859 | Bowles et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4550221 | Mabusth | Oct 1985 | A |
4580790 | Doose | Apr 1986 | A |
4582985 | Loftberg | Apr 1986 | A |
4675544 | Shrenk | Jun 1987 | A |
4758622 | Gosselin | Jul 1988 | A |
4817183 | Sparrow | Mar 1989 | A |
5076566 | Kriegel | Dec 1991 | A |
5079949 | Tamori | Jan 1992 | A |
5109427 | Yang | Apr 1992 | A |
5140642 | Hsu et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5270949 | Atherton et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5305017 | Gerpheide | Apr 1994 | A |
5319323 | Fong | Jun 1994 | A |
5325442 | Knapp | Jun 1994 | A |
5359243 | Norman | Oct 1994 | A |
5420936 | Fitzpatrick et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422807 | Mitra et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429006 | Tamori | Jul 1995 | A |
5456256 | Schneider et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5515738 | Tamori | May 1996 | A |
5543591 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569901 | Bridgelall et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5623552 | Lane | Apr 1997 | A |
5627316 | De Winter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5650842 | Maase et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5717777 | Wong et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5781651 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801681 | Sayag | Sep 1998 | A |
5818956 | Tuli | Oct 1998 | A |
5828773 | Setlak et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838306 | O≢Connor | Nov 1998 | A |
5844287 | Hassan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848176 | Harra et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850450 | Schweitzer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852670 | Setlak et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864296 | Upton | Jan 1999 | A |
5872531 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5887343 | Salatino et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892824 | Beatson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903225 | Schmitt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5915757 | Tsuyama et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920384 | Borza | Jul 1999 | A |
5920640 | Salatino et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940526 | Setlak et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963679 | Setlak | Oct 1999 | A |
5995630 | Borza | Nov 1999 | A |
5999637 | Toyoda et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002389 | Kasser | Dec 1999 | A |
6002815 | Immega et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011859 | Kalnitsky et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016355 | Dickinson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052475 | Upton | Apr 2000 | A |
6067368 | Setlak et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073343 | Petrick et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076566 | Lowe | Jun 2000 | A |
6088585 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098175 | Lee | Aug 2000 | A |
6118318 | Fifield et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134340 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157722 | Lerner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161213 | Lofstrom | Dec 2000 | A |
6175407 | Santor | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182076 | Yu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182892 | Angelo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185318 | Jain et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6234031 | Suga | May 2001 | B1 |
6241288 | Bergenek et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259108 | Antonelli et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289114 | Mainguet | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292272 | Okauchi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317508 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320394 | Tartagni | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325285 | Baratelli | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327376 | Harkin | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330345 | Russo et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332193 | Glass et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333989 | Borza | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337919 | Dunton | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343162 | Saito et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346739 | Lepert et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347040 | Fries et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357663 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360004 | Akizuki | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362633 | Tartagni | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6392636 | Ferrari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399994 | Shobu | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6400836 | Senior | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408087 | Kramer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6459804 | Mainguet | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473072 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481294 | Zellner et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6509501 | Eicken et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6512381 | Kramer | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6525547 | Hayes | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6525932 | Ohnishi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535622 | Russo et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539101 | Black | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546122 | Russo | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580816 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597289 | Sabatini | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6628812 | Setlak et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631201 | Dickinson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643389 | Raynal et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6672174 | Deconde et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6710416 | Xu | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6738050 | Comiskey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741729 | Bjorn et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6757002 | Oross et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766040 | Catalano et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785407 | Tschudi et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799275 | Bjorn | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6836230 | Le Pailleur et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838905 | Doyle | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6862942 | Kawahata | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873356 | Kanbe et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6886104 | McClurg et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6897002 | Teraoka et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898299 | Brooks | May 2005 | B1 |
6924496 | Manansala | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937748 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941001 | Bolle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941810 | Okada | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950540 | Higuchi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6959874 | Bardwell | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6963626 | Shaeffer et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970584 | O'Gorman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980672 | Saito et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983882 | Cassone | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7013030 | Wong et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020591 | Wei et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7030860 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031670 | May | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035443 | Wong | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042535 | Katoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043061 | Hamid et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043644 | DeBruine | May 2006 | B2 |
7046230 | Zadesky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064743 | Nishikawa | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7099496 | Benkley | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110574 | Haruki et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110577 | Tschud | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7113622 | Hamid | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126389 | McRae et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7129926 | Mathiassen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136514 | Wong | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146024 | Benkley | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146026 | Russon et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146029 | Manansala | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7184581 | Johansen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190209 | Kang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190816 | Mitsuyu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194392 | Tuken et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197168 | Russo | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200250 | Chou | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7251351 | Mathiassen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258279 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260246 | Fujii | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263212 | Kawabe | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263213 | Rowe | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7289649 | Walley et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7290323 | Deconde et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308121 | Mathiassen et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308122 | McClurg et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321672 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7356169 | Hamid | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360688 | Harris | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7369685 | DeLeon | May 2008 | B2 |
7379569 | Chikazawa et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7408135 | Fujeda | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7409876 | Ganapathi et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412083 | Takahashi | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7424618 | Roy et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447339 | Mimura et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7447911 | Chou et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460697 | Erhart et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463756 | Benkley | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474772 | Russo et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7505611 | Fyke | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505613 | Russo | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7565548 | Fiske et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574022 | Russo | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7596832 | Hsieh et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7599530 | Boshra | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616787 | Boshra | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634117 | Cho | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643950 | Getzin et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7646897 | Fyke | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7681232 | Nordentoft et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689013 | Shinzaki | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706581 | Drews et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7733697 | Picca et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734074 | Setlak et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751601 | Benkley | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7826645 | Cayen | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7843438 | Onoda | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848798 | Martinsen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7899216 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7953258 | Dean et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8005276 | Dean et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8031916 | Abiko et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8063734 | Conforti | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8077935 | Geoffroy et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8107212 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8116540 | Dean et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131026 | Benkley et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8165355 | Benkley et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175345 | Gardner | May 2012 | B2 |
8204281 | Satya et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8224044 | Benkley | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229184 | Benkley | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8276816 | Gardner | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8278946 | Thompson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290150 | Erhart et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8315444 | Gardner | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331096 | Garcia | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8358815 | Benkley et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374407 | Benkley et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8391568 | Satyan | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8447077 | Benkley et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
RE44440 | Getzin et al. | Aug 2013 | E |
8520913 | Dean et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
20010026636 | Mainget | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030644 | Allport | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036299 | Senior | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043728 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020014530 | Iihama | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020025062 | Black | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020061125 | Fujii | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064892 | Lepert et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067845 | Griffis | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073046 | David | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089044 | Simmons et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020089410 | Janiak et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096731 | Wu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122026 | Bergstrom | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126516 | Jeon | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133725 | Roy et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152048 | Hayes | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171954 | Bonardi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181749 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002717 | Hamid | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030002719 | Hamid et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021495 | Cheng | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035570 | Benkley | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030063782 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030068072 | Hamid | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076301 | Tsuk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076303 | Huppi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095096 | Robbin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095690 | Su et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030102874 | Lane et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123714 | O'Gorman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030123715 | Uchida | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141959 | Keogh et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147015 | Katoh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161510 | Fujii | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161512 | Mathiassen | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169228 | Mathiassen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174871 | Yoshioka et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186157 | Teraoka et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209293 | Sako et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224553 | Manansala | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012773 | Puttkammer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017934 | Kocher et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021786 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040022001 | Chu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042642 | Bolle et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050930 | Rowe | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066613 | Leitao | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076313 | Bronstein et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081339 | Benkley | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096086 | Miyasaka | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113956 | Bellwood et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120400 | Linzer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125993 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040129787 | Saito | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136612 | Meister et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040155752 | Radke | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172339 | Snelgrove et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179718 | Chou | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184641 | Nagasaka et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188838 | Okada et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190761 | Lee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208346 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208347 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208348 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213441 | Tschudi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215689 | Dooley et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040228505 | Sugimoto | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228508 | Shigeta | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240712 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252867 | Lan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031174 | Ryhanen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036665 | Higuchi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047485 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073324 | Umeda et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100196 | Scott et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100938 | Hofmann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103611 | Holscher | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109835 | Jacoby et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110103 | Setlak | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111708 | Chou | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123176 | Ishil et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129291 | Boshra | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136200 | Durell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139656 | Arnouse | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139685 | Kozlay | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162402 | Watanachote | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169503 | Howell et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050174015 | Scott et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210271 | Chou et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219200 | Weng | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050220329 | Payne et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231213 | Chou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238212 | Du et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244038 | Benkley | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244039 | Geoffroy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050247559 | Frey et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249386 | Juh | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258952 | Utter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269402 | Spitzer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060006224 | Modi | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055500 | Burke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057756 | Sato et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066572 | Yumoto et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078176 | Abiko et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083411 | Benkley | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060110537 | Huang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140461 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144953 | Takao | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170528 | Funushige et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181521 | Perrault et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060182319 | Setlank et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187200 | Martin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210082 | Devadas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214512 | Iwata | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214767 | Carrieri | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239514 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249008 | Luther | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259873 | Mister | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261174 | Zellner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267125 | Huang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060267385 | Steenwyk et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271793 | Devadas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285728 | Leung et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287963 | Steeves et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031011 | Erhart et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036400 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057763 | Blattner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058843 | Theis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067828 | Bychkov | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076926 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076951 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086634 | Setlak et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070090312 | Stallinga et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138299 | Mitra | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154072 | Taraba et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160269 | Kuo | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180261 | Akkermans et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196002 | Choi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198141 | Moore | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198435 | Siegal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070228154 | Tran | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237366 | Maletsky | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237368 | Bjorn et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248249 | Stoianov | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070290124 | Neil et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002867 | Mathiassen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013805 | Sengupta et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019578 | Saito et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049987 | Champagne et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049989 | Iseri et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063245 | Benkley et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080069412 | Champagne et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080126260 | Cox et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080169345 | Keane et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080170695 | Adler et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175450 | Scott | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178008 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179112 | Qin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185429 | Saville | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201265 | Hewton | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205714 | Benkley et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219521 | Benkley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222049 | Loomis et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080223925 | Saito et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226132 | Gardner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238878 | Wang | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240523 | Benkley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080240537 | Yang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244277 | Orsini et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267462 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279373 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080317290 | Tazoe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001999 | Douglas | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090130369 | Huang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140838 | Newman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153297 | Gardner | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090154779 | Satyan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155456 | Benkley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090169071 | Bond et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174974 | Huang et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090212902 | Haddock | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218698 | Lam | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237135 | Ramaraju et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252384 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252385 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252386 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279742 | Abiko | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319435 | Little et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324028 | Russo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026451 | Erhart et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045705 | Vertegaal et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100083000 | Kesanupalli et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100117794 | Adams et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100119124 | Satyan | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123675 | Ippel | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127366 | Bond et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100176823 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176892 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177940 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180136 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189314 | Benkley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208953 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244166 | Shibuta et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272329 | Benkley | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284565 | Benkley et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110002461 | Erhart et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018556 | Le et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110083018 | Kesanupalli et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083170 | Kesanupalli et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090047 | Patel | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102567 | Erhart | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102569 | Erhart | May 2011 | A1 |
20110175703 | Benkley | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176037 | Benkley, III | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182486 | Valfridsson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110214924 | Perezselsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221942 | Taura | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110267298 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110298711 | Dean et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304001 | Erhart et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120044639 | Garcia | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120148122 | Dean et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120189166 | Russo | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120189172 | Russo | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120206586 | Gardner | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120256280 | Erhart | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257032 | Benkley | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120308092 | Benkley et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130021044 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130094715 | Benkley et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130177220 | Erhart et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130258142 | Russo | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2213813 | Oct 1973 | DE |
0791899 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0791899 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0791899 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0929028 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0905646 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0973123 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1018697 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1139301 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1531419 | May 2005 | EP |
1533759 | May 2005 | EP |
1536368 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1538548 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1624399 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1775674 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1939788 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2331613 | May 1999 | GB |
2480919 | Dec 2011 | GB |
2487661 | Aug 2012 | GB |
2489100 | Sep 2012 | GB |
2490192 | Oct 2012 | GB |
2474999 | Feb 2013 | GB |
2499497 | Aug 2013 | GB |
01094418 | Apr 1989 | JP |
04158434 | Jun 1992 | JP |
2003256820 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2005011002 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005242856 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006053768 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2007305097 | Nov 2007 | JP |
3569804 | Sep 2009 | JP |
200606745 | Feb 2006 | TW |
200606746 | Feb 2006 | TW |
200614092 | May 2006 | TW |
200617798 | Jun 2006 | TW |
200620140 | Jun 2006 | TW |
200629167 | Aug 2006 | TW |
WO 9003620 | Apr 1990 | WO |
WO 9858342 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9928701 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9943258 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9946724 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO2011088252 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0122349 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0159558 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0194902 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0194902 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0195304 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0211066 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0247018 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0247018 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02061668 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02077907 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03063054 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03075210 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004066194 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004066693 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005104012 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106774 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106774 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006040724 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006041780 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2007011607 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2008033264 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033264 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033265 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033265 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008137287 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009002599 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009002599 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009029257 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079219 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079221 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079262 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010034036 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010036445 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010143597 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011088248 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011053797 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Matsumoto et al., Impact of Artificial “Gummy” Fingers on Fingerprint Systems, SPIE 4677 (2002), reprinted from cryptome.org. |
Maltoni, “Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition”, XP002355942 Springer, New York, USA, Jun. 2003 pp. 65-69. |
Vermasan, et al., “A500 dpi AC Capacitive Hybrid Flip-Chip CMOS ASIC/Sensor Module for Fingerprint, Navigation, and Pointer Detection With On-Chip Data Processing”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 38, No. 12, Dec. 2003, pp. 2288-2294. |
Ratha, et al. “Adaptive Flow Orientation Based Feature Extraction in Fingerprint Images,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 28 No. 11, 1657-1672, Nov. 1995. |
Ratha, et al., “A Real Time Matching System for Large Fingerprint Databases,” IEEE, Aug. 1996. |
Shu, et al., “Design and Implementation of the AEGIS Single-Chip Secure Processor Using Physical Random Functions”, Computer Architecture, 2005, ISCA '05, Proceedings, 32nd International Symposium, Jun. 2005 (MIT Technical Report CSAIL CSG-TR-843, 2004. |
Rivest, et al., “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems”, Communication of the ACM, vol. 21 (2), pp. 120-126. (1978). |
Hiltgen, et al., “Secure Internet Banking Authentication”, IEEE Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society, New York, NY, US, Mar. 1, 2006, pp. 24-31, XP007908655, ISSN: 1540-7993. |
Hegt, “Analysis of Current and Future Phishing Attacks on Internet Banking Services”, Mater Thesis. Techische Universiteit Eindhoven—Department of Mathematics and Computer Science May 31, 2008, pp. 1-149, XP002630374, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://alexandria.tue.nl/extral/afstversl/wsk-i/hgt2008.pdf [retrieved on Mar. 29, 2011] *pp. 127-134, paragraph 6.2*. |
Gassend, et al., “Controlled Physical Random Functions”, In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Computer Security Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, Dec. 12, 2002. |
Wikipedia (Mar. 2003). “Integrated Circuit,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/integrated—circuit. Revision as of Mar. 23, 2003. |
Wikipedia (Dec. 2006). “Integrated circuit” Revision as of Dec. 10, 2006. http://en.widipedia.org/wiki/Integrated—circuit. |
Bellagiodesigns.Com (Internet Archive Wayback Machine, www.bellagiodesigns.com date: Oct. 29, 2005). |
Closed Loop Systems, The Free Dictionary, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/closed-loop+system (downloaded Dec. 1, 2011). |
Feedback: Electronic Engineering, Wikipedia, p. 5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback#Electronic—engineering (downloaded Dec. 1, 2011). |
Galy et al. (Jul. 2007) “A full fingerprint verification system for a single-line sweep sensor.” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 7 No. 7, pp. 1054-1065. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140016838 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13372153 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 13965978 | US | |
Parent | 12098367 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 13372153 | US |