This invention relates to fingerprint sensing technology, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for reducing the effects of noise and parasitic capacitive coupling in fingerprint sensing circuits.
Fingerprint sensing technology is increasingly recognized as a reliable, non-intrusive way to verify individual identity. Fingerprints, like various other biometric characteristics, are based on unalterable personal characteristics and thus are believed to be more reliable when identifying individuals. The potential applications for fingerprints sensors are myriad. For example, electronic fingerprint sensors may be used to provide access control in stationary applications, such as security checkpoints. Electronic fingerprint sensors may also be used to provide access control in portable applications, such as portable computers, personal data assistants (PDAs), cell phones, gaming devices, navigation devices, information appliances, data storage devices, and the like. Accordingly, some applications, particularly portable applications, may require electronic fingerprint sensing systems that are compact, highly reliable, and inexpensive.
Various electronic fingerprint sensing methods, techniques, and devices have been proposed or are currently under development. For example, optical and capacitive fingerprint sensing devices are currently on the market or under development. Like a digital camera, optical technology utilizes visible light to capture a digital image. In particular, optical technology may use a light source to illuminate an individual's finger while a charge-coupled device (CCD) captures an analog image. This analog image may then be converted to a digital image.
There are generally two types of capacitive fingerprint sensing technologies: passive and active. Both types of capacitive technologies utilize the same principles of capacitance to generate fingerprint images. Passive capacitive technology typically utilizes an array of plates to apply an electrical current to the finger. The voltage discharge is then measured through the finger. Fingerprint ridges will typically have a substantially greater discharge potential than valleys, which may have little or no discharge.
Active capacitive technology is similar to passive technology, but may require initial excitation of the epidermal skin layer of the finger by applying a voltage. Active capacitive sensors, however, may be adversely affected by dry or worn minutia, which may fail to drive the sensor's output amplifier. By contrast, passive sensors are typically capable of producing images regardless of contact resistance and require significantly less power.
Although each of the fingerprint sensing technologies described above may generate satisfactory fingerprint images, each may be adversely affected by noise, interference, and other effects. For example, capacitive sensors may be particularly susceptible to noise and parasitic capacitive coupling, which may degrade the quality of the acquired fingerprint image. Accordingly, it would be an advance in the art to reduce the effects of noise, parasitic capacitive coupling, and other effects in capacitive-type fingerprint sensing circuits.
In order that the advantages of the invention will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific examples illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical examples of the invention and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
The invention has been developed in response to the present state of the art, and in particular, in response to the problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully solved by currently available fingerprint sensors. Accordingly, the invention has been developed to provide novel apparatus and methods for reducing parasitic capacitive coupling and noise in fingerprint sensing circuits. The features and advantages of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims and their equivalents, and also any subsequent claims or amendments presented, or may be learned by practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
Consistent with the foregoing, a fingerprint sensing circuit having reduced parasitic capacitive coupling and noise is disclosed in one embodiment of the invention as including multiple transmitting elements, such as a linear array of transmitting elements, to sequentially emit a probing signal. A digital ground is provided to ground digital components in the fingerprint sensing circuit. A quiet ground, separate from and containing less noise than the digital ground, is provided to ground inactive transmitting elements (i.e., transmitting elements that are not currently emitting the probing signal). Control logic is provided to connect the inactive transmitting elements to the quiet ground, while disconnecting active transmitting elements (i.e., transmitting elements that are currently emitting the probing signal) from the quiet ground. The quiet ground is provided to reduce parasitic capacitive coupling and noise on inactive transmitting elements.
In selected embodiments, the fingerprint sensing circuit further includes multiple switches to selectively connect and disconnect each transmitting element from the quiet ground. The control logic may be used to control the operation of the switches. In certain embodiments, the control logic is further configured to connect, to the digital ground, transmitting elements that are adjacent to the active transmitting element. This may be performed to keep noise and other unwanted signals from adversely being transmitted onto the quiet ground.
In another embodiment in accordance with the invention, a method for reducing parasitic capacitive coupling and noise in fingerprint sensing circuits includes providing multiple transmitting elements to sequentially emit a probing signal, a digital ground to ground digital components in the fingerprint sensing circuit, and a quiet ground, separate from the digital ground, to ground inactive transmitting elements. The method further includes connecting inactive transmitting elements to the quiet ground and disconnecting active transmitting elements from the quiet ground. In this way, the quiet ground may be used to reduce parasitic capacitive coupling and noise on inactive transmitting elements.
In yet another embodiment in accordance with the invention, a fingerprint sensing circuit for reducing the adverse effects of parasitic capacitive coupling and noise includes multiple receiving elements to sequentially sense a probing signal. A digital ground is provided to ground digital components in the fingerprint sensing circuit. A quiet ground, separate from the digital ground, is provided to ground inactive receiving elements (i.e., receiving elements that are not currently sensing the probing signal). Control logic is provided to connect inactive receiving elements to the quiet ground while disconnecting active receiving elements (i.e., receiving elements that are currently sensing the probing signal) from the quiet ground. In this way, the quiet ground may reduce the adverse effects of parasitic capacitive coupling and noise on receiving elements configured to sense or detect a probing signal.
It will be readily understood that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the Figures herein, may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the systems and methods of the present invention, as represented in the Figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is merely representative of selected embodiments of the invention.
Some of the functional units or method steps described in this specification may be embodied or implemented as modules. For example, a module may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices, or the like.
Modules may also be implemented in software for execution by various types of processors. An identified module of executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve the stated purpose of the module.
Indeed, a module of executable code could be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
The illustrated embodiments of the invention will be best understood by reference to the drawings, wherein like parts are designated by like numerals throughout. The following description is intended only by way of example, and simply illustrates certain selected embodiments of apparatus and methods that are consistent with the invention as claimed herein.
Referring to
In certain embodiments, the fingerprint sensing area 12 may include an array of transmitting elements 16, such as a linear array of transmitting elements 16, to assist in scanning lines of “pixels” as a fingerprint is swiped across the fingerprint sensing area 12. In this embodiment, the transmitting elements 16 are shown as a linear array of conductive traces 16 connected to a fingerprint sensing circuit 18. The transmitting elements 16 are not drawn to scale and may include several hundred transmitting elements 16 arranged across the width of a fingerprint, one transmitting element 16 per pixel. A fingerprint image may be generated by scanning successive lines of pixels as a finger is swiped over the array. These lines may then be assembled to generate a fingerprint image, similar to the way a fax image is generated using line-by-line scanning.
In certain embodiments, the transmitting elements 16 are configured to sequentially emit, or burst, a probing signal, one after the other. As will be explained in more detail hereafter, the probing signal may include a burst of probing pulses, such as a burst of square waves. This probing signal may be sensed on the receiving end by a receiving element 20. Like the transmitting elements 16, the receiving element 20 is shown as a conductive trace 20 connected to the fingerprint sensing circuit 18. Although shown as a single receiving element 20, in other embodiments, pairs of receiving elements 20 may be used to differentially cancel out noise.
At the receiving element 20, a response signal may be generated in response to the probing signal. The magnitude of the response signal may depend on factors such as whether a finger is present over the fingerprint sensing area 12 and, more particularly, whether a ridge or valley of a fingerprint is immediately over the gap 22 between a transmitting element 16 and the receiving element 20. The magnitude of the signal generated at the receiving element 20 may be directly related to the RF impedance of a finger ridge or valley placed over the gap 22 between the corresponding transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20.
By using a single receiving element 20 (or a small number of receiving elements 20) and a comparatively larger number of transmitting elements 16, a receiver that is coupled to the receiving element 20 may be designed to be very high quality and with a much better dynamic range than would be possible using an array of multiple receiving elements. This design differs from many conventional fingerprint sensors, which may employ a single large transmitting element with a large array of receiving elements and receivers. Nevertheless, the apparatus and methods described herein are not limited to the illustrated transmitter and receiver design. Indeed, the apparatus and methods disclosed herein may be used with fingerprint sensors using a small number of transmitting elements and a relatively large number of receiving elements, a large number of transmitting elements and a relatively small number of receiving element, or a roughly equal number of transmitting and receiving elements.
As shown in
Referring generally to
In selected embodiments, a user's finger may be swiped across the side of the substrate 30 opposite the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20. Thus, the substrate 30 may electrically and mechanically isolates a user's finger from the transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20, thereby providing some degree of protection from electrostatic discharge (ESD) and mechanical abrasion.
The capacitive coupling between the transmitting element 16 and the receiving element 20 may change depending on whether a fingerprint ridge or valley is immediately over the gap 22. This is because the dielectric constant of a finger is typically ten to twenty times greater than the dielectric constant of air. The dielectric constant of the ridges of a finger may vary significantly from finger to finger and person to person, explaining the significant range of dielectric constants. Because a fingerprint ridge has a dielectric constant that differs significantly from that of air, the capacitive coupling between the transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20 may vary significantly depending on whether a ridge or valley is present over the sensor gap 22.
For example, referring to
Referring to
The output from the band pass filter 52 may then be supplied to an envelope detector 54, which may detect the envelope of the response signal. This envelope may provide a baseband signal, the amplitude of which may vary depending on whether a ridge or valley is over the sensor gap 22. The baseband signal may be passed to a low pass filter 56 to remove unwanted higher frequencies. The variable-gain amplifier 50, band pass filter 52, envelope detector 54, low pass filter 56, as well as other analog components may be collectively referred to as an analog front end 57.
The output from the low pass filter 56 may be passed to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 58, which may convert the analog output to a digital value. The ADC 58 may have, for example, a resolution of 8 to 12 bits and may be capable of resolving the output of the low pass filter 56 to 256 to 4096 values. The magnitude of the digital value may be proportional to the signal strength measured at the receiving element 20. Likewise, as explained above, the signal strength may be related to the capacitive coupling between the transmitting element 16 and receiving element 20, which may depend on the RF impedance of the feature over the sensor gap 22.
The resulting digital value may be passed to a CPU 60 or other digital components, which may eventually pass digital fingerprint data to a host system 62. The host system 62, in selected embodiments, may process the fingerprint data using various matching algorithms in order to authenticate a user's fingerprint.
In addition to processing the digital data, the CPU 60 may control the gain of the variable-gain amplifier 50 using a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 64. The gain may be adjusted to provide a desired output power or amplitude in the presence of variable sensing conditions. For example, in selected embodiments, the gain of the variable-gain amplifier 50 may be adjusted to compensate for variations in the impedance of different fingers. In selected embodiments, the CPU 60 may also control the operation of the scanning logic 42.
Referring to
As shown in
For example, the width and spacing of the transmitting elements 16 may determine the resolution of the acquired fingerprint image. To achieve an industry standard resolution of 500 dots per inch, for example, the width of each transmitting element 16 may be approximately 25 microns. Similarly, the gap between adjacent transmitting elements 16 may be approximately 25 microns. The sensor gap 22 between the transmitting elements 16 and the receiving element 20 may be approximately 25 microns. This results in a center-to-center spacing of adjacent transmitting elements 16 of approximately 50 microns. Nevertheless, these dimensions are provided only by way of example and are not intended to be limiting.
As previously mentioned, the transmitting elements 16 may be coupled to output buffer amplifiers 46 to amplify the probing signal and accommodate a change in electrical impedance. More particularly, the output buffer amplifiers 46 may sequentially burst a probing signal 48 to each of the transmitting elements 16, one after the other, as described in
In addition to providing a ground for the transmitting elements 16, the digital ground 74 may provide a ground for various digital components in the fingerprint sensing circuit 18, such as the CPU 60 and other digital components such as the ADC 58, DAC 64, oscillator 40, and the like. This may allow any parasitic capacitive fields between the active transmitting element 16 and the inactive transmitting elements 16 to be shorted to the digital ground 74.
Although the digital ground 74 may reduce much of the undesired parasitic capacitive coupling between the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20, the digital ground 74 may have the undesired effect of transmitting noise onto the transmitting elements 16. This noise may be the result of switching noise generated by digital components such as the CPU 60, memory, or other digital components when they change state. This noise may be capacitively coupled to other transmitting elements 16 or the receiving element 20, thereby degrading the acquired fingerprint image. Thus, apparatus and methods are needed to reduce the noise that is transmitted from the digital ground 74 onto the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20.
In selected embodiments in accordance with the invention, a quiet ground 76 separate from and isolated from the digital ground 74 may be used to reduce noise on the transmitting and receiving elements 16, 20. In certain embodiments, the quiet ground 76 and digital ground 74 may not be totally separated, but may, for example, connect at a single point. The single point may keep the ground potentials of the ground planes substantially the same, but may keep the transfer of digital noise to a minimum. Switches 78 may be used to selectively connect and disconnect the transmitting elements 16 to and from the quiet ground 76. In certain embodiments, control logic 80 may be used to open and close the switches 78 as the probing signal is sequentially transmitted to each transmitting element 16.
The dotted line 81 in the control logic 80 is used to show the current column of logic values which is output to the buffer amplifiers 46a-g. These logic values will change as the fingerprint sensing circuit 18 sequentially moves from one transmitting element 16a-g to the next. In certain embodiments, the control logic 80 may output the illustrated logic values, moving left to right, column-by-column, to the buffer amplifiers 46a-g.
In certain embodiments in accordance with the invention, the control logic 80 may be configured to connect inactive transmitting elements 16c, 16e that are adjacent to the active transmitting element 16d to the digital ground 74, while connecting all other inactive transmitting elements 16a, 16b, 16f, 16g to the quiet ground 76. This technique may reduce the amount of noise that would otherwise be parasitically coupled from the active transmitting element 16d to the adjacent transmitting elements 16c, 16e and ultimately onto the quiet ground 76. In other words, this technique may help ensure that the quiet ground 76 is maintained as quiet as possible.
For example, as illustrated in
Apparatus and methods in accordance with the invention are not limited to the illustrated embodiment. For example, in other embodiments, transmitting elements 16c, 16e that are adjacent to the active transmitting element 16d may be coupled to the quiet ground 76 just like other transmitting elements 16a, 16b, 16f, 16g. In this embodiment, only the active transmitting element 16d is decoupled from the quiet ground 76. Whether adjacent transmitting elements 16c, 16e are or are not coupled to the quiet ground 76 may depend on the amount of parasitic capacitance between the active transmitting element 16d and the adjacent transmitting elements 16c, 16d.
By contrast, in other embodiments, more than two adjacent transmitting elements may be coupled to the digital ground 74 and decoupled from the quiet ground 76. For example, two transmitting elements 16b, 16c, 16e, 16f on either side of the active transmitting element 16d may be coupled to the digital ground 74 and decoupled from the quiet ground 76 to ensure that the quiet ground 76 is maintained as quiet as possible. Similarly, any number of transmitting elements 16 on either side of the active transmitting element 16d may be coupled to the digital ground 74 and decoupled from the quiet ground 76.
Referring to
For example,
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described examples are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4353056 | Tsikos | Oct 1982 | A |
4525859 | Bowles et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4550221 | Mabusth | Oct 1985 | A |
5076566 | Kriegel | Dec 1991 | A |
5109427 | Yang | Apr 1992 | A |
5305017 | Gerpheide | Apr 1994 | A |
5319323 | Fong | Jun 1994 | A |
5325442 | Knapp | Jun 1994 | A |
5420936 | Fitzpatrick et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422807 | Mitra et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5543591 | Gillespie et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569901 | Bridgelall et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5623552 | Lane | Apr 1997 | A |
5627316 | De Winter et al. | May 1997 | A |
5650842 | Maase et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5717777 | Wong et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5781651 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801681 | Sayag | Sep 1998 | A |
5818956 | Tuli | Oct 1998 | A |
5852670 | Setlak et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864296 | Upton | Jan 1999 | A |
5887343 | Salatino et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5903225 | Schmitt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920384 | Borza | Jul 1999 | A |
5920640 | Salatino et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940526 | Setlak et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5999637 | Toyoda et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002815 | Immega et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016355 | Dickinson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6052475 | Upton | Apr 2000 | A |
6067368 | Setlak et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073343 | Petrick et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076566 | Lowe | Jun 2000 | A |
6088585 | Schmitt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098175 | Lee | Aug 2000 | A |
6134340 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157722 | Lerner et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182892 | Angelo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185318 | Jain et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6259108 | Antonelli et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289114 | Mainguet | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6317508 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320394 | Tartagni | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6333989 | Borza | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346739 | Lepert et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347040 | Fries et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362633 | Tartagni | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6392636 | Ferrari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400836 | Senior | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408087 | Kramer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6473072 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6509501 | Eicken et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6539101 | Black | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6580816 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6643389 | Raynal et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6672174 | Deconde et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6738050 | Comiskey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741729 | Bjorn et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6757002 | Oross et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766040 | Catalano et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785407 | Tschudi et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6838905 | Doyle | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6886104 | McClurg et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6897002 | Teraoka et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898299 | Brooks | May 2005 | B1 |
6937748 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941001 | Bolle et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6941810 | Okada | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950540 | Higuchi | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6959874 | Bardwell | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970584 | O'Gorman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980672 | Saito et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983882 | Cassone | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7020591 | Wei et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7030860 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7042535 | Katoh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043644 | DeBruine | May 2006 | B2 |
7046230 | Zadesky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7064743 | Nishikawa | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7099496 | Benkley | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110577 | Tschudi | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7126389 | McRae et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7129926 | Mathiassen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136514 | Wong | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146024 | Benkley | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146026 | Russon et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7146029 | Manansala | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7194392 | Tuken et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197168 | Russo | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200250 | Chou | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7258279 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7290323 | Deconde et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308122 | McClurg et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321672 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7460697 | Erhart et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463756 | Benkley | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7643950 | Getzin et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7751601 | Benkley | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20010036299 | Senior | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043728 | Kramer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020025062 | Black | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020067845 | Griffis | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089410 | Janiak et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020122026 | Bergstrom | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126516 | Jeon | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133725 | Roy et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020181749 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002717 | Hamid | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030002719 | Hamid et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035570 | Benkley | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030068072 | Hamid | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076301 | Tsuk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076303 | Huppi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095096 | Robbin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123714 | O'Gorman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030141959 | Keogh et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147015 | Katoh et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161510 | Fujii | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161512 | Mathiassen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169228 | Mathiassen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174871 | Yoshioka et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030186157 | Teraoka et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224553 | Manansala | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012773 | Puttkammer | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040050930 | Rowe | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040076313 | Bronstein et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081339 | Benkley | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096086 | Miyasaka | May 2004 | A1 |
20040113956 | Bellwood et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120400 | Linzer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125993 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040129787 | Saito | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136612 | Meister et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172339 | Snelgrove et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179718 | Chou | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184641 | Nagasaka et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040190761 | Lee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208346 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208347 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208348 | Baharav et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213441 | Tschudi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215689 | Dooley | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040228505 | Sugimoto | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228508 | Shigeta | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240712 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252867 | Lan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050036665 | Higuchi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047485 | Khayrallah et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100196 | Scott et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110103 | Setlak | May 2005 | A1 |
20050139656 | Arnouse | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162402 | Watanachote | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169503 | Howell et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210271 | Chou et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219200 | Weng | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238212 | Du et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244038 | Benkley | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050244039 | Geoffroy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249386 | Juh | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258952 | Utter et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050269402 | Spitzer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060066572 | Yumoto et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078176 | Abiko et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083411 | Benkley | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060140461 | Kim et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144953 | Takao | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187200 | Martin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210082 | Devadas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060214512 | Iwata | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239514 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249008 | Luther | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261174 | Zellner et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271793 | Devadas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070031011 | Erhart et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036400 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070057763 | Blattner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067828 | Bychkov | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076926 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076951 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086634 | Setlak et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070090312 | Stallinga et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138299 | Mitra | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070198141 | Moore | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198435 | Siegal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070228154 | Tran | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237366 | Maletsky | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248249 | Stoianov | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080013805 | Sengupta et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019578 | Saito et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049987 | Champagne et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063245 | Benkley et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080179112 | Qin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080205714 | Benkley et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219521 | Benkley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226132 | Gardner | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240523 | Benkley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267462 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080279373 | Erhart et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090153297 | Gardner | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090154779 | Satyan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155456 | Benkley et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090252385 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090252386 | Dean et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100026451 | Erhart et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100083000 | Kesanupalli et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100176823 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176892 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177940 | Dean et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100180136 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189314 | Benkley et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208953 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100272329 | Benkley | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284565 | Benkley et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110002461 | Erhart et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2213813 | Oct 1973 | DE |
1018697 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1139301 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1531419 | May 2005 | EP |
1533759 | May 2005 | EP |
1538548 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1624399 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1939788 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2331613 | May 1999 | GB |
04158434 | Jun 1992 | JP |
WO 9003620 | Apr 1990 | WO |
WO 9858342 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9928701 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9943258 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0122349 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0194902 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0194902 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0247018 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0247018 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02061668 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02077907 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03063054 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03075210 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004066194 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2004066693 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005104012 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106774 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106774 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006041780 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2007011607 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2008033264 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033264 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033265 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008033265 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008137287 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009002599 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009002599 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009079219 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079221 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009079262 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010034036 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010036445 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090252386 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |