The present disclosure relates generally to sampling circuitry and, more particularly, an apparatus, a system, circuitry, and an associated method, for generating sampling clock signals having reduced timing mismatch.
Analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) utilize sampling circuitry that samples an analog input signal at points in time and, then, converts the samples to digital values to create a digital signal. The use of ADCs is common in applications that involve receiving an input signal or input data represented by an analog signal, and then operate to convert the analog signal to a digital signal for further processing in a digital form. In order to convert an analog input signal accurately, the sampling of the input signal performed by the sampling circuitry should be accomplished so that it provides samples to the converter, which represent an analog input signal with as much precision as feasible. As the frequency of an analog input signal (Fin) to be converted increases, the necessary frequency of sampling also increases. As the number of the types of applications in which ADCs are used has increased, there has also been an increase in the need for ADCs capable of operation at increasingly higher speeds of operation.
Time interleaved ADCs, which utilize multiple channels to process an analog input signal on a time interleaved basis, are a type of ADC that has been developed for high-speed applications, high-speed implementations, etc. Interleaving can also lower the power consumption for a given resolution. This is because, as the sampling rate of single-channel ADCs approaches the limits of the technology used, the speed/power trade-off of the single-channel ADCs becomes nonlinear: making interleaving an attractive alternative. If a sufficient number of ADC channels are interleaved, then each bears a linear speed/power trade-off and, hence, reaches an optimum framework. The overhead associated with interleaving should also be taken into account in assessing the overall performance of any system. Additionally, for resolutions of roughly 8 bits and above, the mismatches among the channels, for example timing mismatches between the samples on each of the interleaved channels, should be removed. This may be done, for example, via foreground or background calibration.
Time interleaved ADCs effectively provide a speed advantage in the sampling rate of digital to analog conversion over single channel ADCs, since the conversion rate increases proportionally with the number of channels. In a time interleaved ADC, each channel is able to sample the analog input signal in turn. With N Channels operating in parallel, the sampling rate increases by the factor N over that of a single channel ADC. During a time in which a sample is being taken from one channel, samples from the other channels may be processed. The time interleaved ADCs, therefore, generate digital code words at higher rates than a single channel system. However, a drawback of time interleaved ADCs is that errors can arise because of mismatches between the different channels. Interleaved technology is sensitive to timing mismatches between the channels.
Hence, in addition to raising the conversion speed, interleaving also reduces the metastability rate making an ADC more stable. Since each channel is given a longer time for conversion, the probability of metastability drops exponentially. In a general sense, the performance of interleaved ADCs is typically limited by mismatches among the channels. Gain, offset, and timing mismatches heavily impact the overall signal-to-(noise+distortion) ratio (SNDR) at resolutions of 8 bits or higher. Often times, the timing mismatch is the most difficult to calibrate because it does not easily lend itself to detection or correction.
In a typical time interleaved sampling ADC, sampling signals are used to control the timing of sampling on each of the interleaved channels of the ADC. A track and hold circuit can be used to track (and then take) a sample of the analog input signal from a channel when the sampling signal changes from one state to another: triggering a switch to hold a sample of the analog input signal. Any mismatches between the switches and any timing mismatches between the edges of the sampling signals cause the sequence of interleaved samples from the interleaved channels to be non-uniformly spaced in time. The non-uniform spacing of the samples results in the appearance of undesired spectral components in the output sequence of the sampling system. These spectral components typically produce images of the desired sampled signal and, frequently, occur at undesired locations in the output spectrum. For example, in a simple two-way interleaved system, timing mismatches in the sample clocks can result in images of the desired signal appearing at Fs/2 +/−Fin, where Fs is the sampling frequency of the system and Fin is the frequency of the input signal to the system. The magnitudes of the images are proportional to the time difference between sampling channels, and also proportional to the frequency of the input signal. These errors degrade the maximum achievable spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR) of the sampling system, especially at higher input frequencies.
Reducing the effects of the spectral artifacts caused by timing mismatch is costly. Large digital filters, which consume significant power, can be used. Alternately, lower-power analog circuits can be used to “trim” the timing errors to a small value. However, in either case, the degree to which the errors can be reduced below an acceptable level and maintained at the acceptable level [despite ambient changes in supply, temperature, die stress, etc.,] can depend on how small the errors are initially. Small initial errors tend to remain small, while large initial errors can be reduced by trimming, but tend to drift significantly as ambient changes occur.
Because timing errors are so difficult to remove, systems often utilize some form of randomization of the sampling networks by using additional networks. This does not remove the impact of the timing errors. The randomization simply distributes the errors more randomly in time, rather than in a fixed pattern. This tends to spread the errors into the noise floor of the system. This action increases the noise floor of the system and, further, degrades the maximum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that the sampling system can achieve. Minimizing the timing errors, therefore, maximizes the potential signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that the system can achieve. This is true even when randomization is also used. A system with a small initial timing error provides an advantage in any time interleaved ADC system. Therefore, it would be desirable to have a solution that minimized the timing mismatch in a time interleaved ADC that required reduced complexity to implement, that was relatively simple to implement, and that could be used by itself or in combination with other techniques.
Overview
The present disclosure relates generally to an apparatus, a system, circuitry, and a method for generating sampling signals for controlling a sampling system. In an example embodiment, the method, system, and apparatus may comprise circuitry that generates outputs as sampling clocks for a time interleaved sampling circuit having multiple interleaved sampling channels. The circuitry may be implemented such that common circuitry is shared between the sampling clock circuitry of each of the multiple interleaved channels. Utilization of the common circuitry allows uniform control of the timing relationship between the sampling clocks relative to one another. Such an approach can reduce the timing skew between the sampling clocks. In example implementations of the embodiments, the multiple interleaved sampling channels may comprise the interleaved sampling channels of an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) circuit.
In one embodiment, a circuit for receiving a plurality of input signals including an input clock signal, and generating a plurality of sampling clocks, is provided. The circuit comprises first circuitry configured to selectively set each sampling clock of the plurality of sampling clocks to a first output state, wherein a selected sampling clock of the plurality of sampling clocks is set to the first output state when a selected input of the plurality of input signals is set to a first input state. The circuit also comprises second circuitry configured to transition each of the plurality of sampling clocks to a second output state, through a common path, wherein the selected sampling clock is transitioned from the first output state to the second output state through the common path in response to a transition of the input clock signal from a first to a second clock state.
In another embodiment, the circuit may comprise boost circuitry to generate boosted outputs as sampling clocks for a time interleaved sampling circuit. The boosted sampling clocks provide a higher signal level for turning on the switches that are driven by the sampling clock outputs. The circuitry can be implemented such that common circuitry may be shared between the sampling clock circuitry of each of the multiple interleaved channels. Utilization of the common circuitry can allow for a uniform control of the timing relationship between the boosted sampling clocks.
In yet another embodiment, the circuit may include a sampling circuit that includes a plurality of sampling channels each coupled to an output of the first circuitry corresponding to one of the plurality of sampling clocks. The sampling circuit may be configured to generate a sample from a selected channel of the plurality of channels when the selected sampling clock is transitioned to the second output state from the first output state.
In another example embodiment, the method, system, and apparatus comprises circuitry to generate outputs as sampling clocks for an time interleaved sampling circuit that includes a structure that minimizes timing skew between the sampling clocks by utilizing a common clock signal that controls pull-up/hold-down circuitry that may be shared between the sampling clock circuitry of each of the multiple interleaved channels. Utilization of the common pull-up/hold-down circuitry allows control of the timing relationship between the edges of the sampling clocks of the multiple interleaved channels relative to one another to minimize clock skew. In this implementation of the pull-up/hold-down circuitry, the sampling clocks may be boosted.
In other example embodiments, the method, system, and apparatus comprises circuitry to generate outputs as sampling clocks for an time interleaved sampling circuit that may include structure that minimizes timing skew between the sampling clocks by utilizing a common clock signal. The common clock signal controls pull-up/hold-down circuitry and pull-down circuitry that may be shared between the sampling clock circuitry of each of the multiple interleaved channels. Utilization of the common pull-up/hold-down circuitry and pull-down circuitry allows control of the timing relationship between the edges of the sampling clocks of the multiple interleaved channels (relative to one another) to minimize clock skew. In an example implementation of the embodiment of the pull-up/hold-down circuitry and pull-down circuitry, the sampling clocks may be boosted.
To provide a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, in which:
The present disclosure relates generally to an apparatus, a system, and method for generating sampling signals for a controlling a sampling system. More particularly, the present apparatus, system, and method provides embodiments for generating sampling clocks for interleaved sampling circuits that minimize mismatch and timing skew between the sampling clocks of the multiple channels of an interleaved sampling circuit.
Referring now to
The switch-level implementation of
In the embodiment of
Referring now to
Referring to
When SEL0 moves to low at T3, SEL1 moves to high and the previously described process for generating the sampling clock at Qp[0] for interleaved sampling CHANNEL 0 happens similarly for generating the sampling clock at Qp[1] for interleaved sampling CHANNEL 1, with the SEL1, Q1 and Qp[1] signals substituted for SEL0, Q0 and Qp[0], respectively, capacitor C10 substituted for capacitor C11, and the switches S21, S23, S24, S25, S26 and S34 substituted for switches S20, S22, S29, S30, S27 and S33, respectively, in the described process. Similarly, as on CHANNEL 0 when Qp[0] was pulled low by CLK going high at T2, a sample on CHANNEL 1 will be taken when Qp[1] is pulled low from the voltage level of the high logic state input Q1 plus VBST through S26 and S28 by the CLK signal going high at T4 while SEL1 is high. In the two channel embodiment of
The sampling clocks Qp[0] and Qp[1] for the interleaved channels in the embodiment of
Additionally, the embodiment of
Referring now to
One purpose of booster circuitry 302 is to turn on the sampling switches driven by Qp[0] and Qp[1] using a large gate-to-source voltage (VGS), even when the supply voltage is limited or small, compared to the threshold voltage of the transistors used to sample the input signal. It should be noted that in many low voltage CMOS sampling circuits, the use of clock boosting is important for turning switches on.
When the circuitry of
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring again to
At the sampling time, when the CLK input transitions from the low state to the high state, pull-down circuitry 404 may be used to pull-down Qp[0], Qp[1] or Qp[2] through MN2[0], MN[2] or MN[1], respectively, to the low state of node 403 via common node N through MN_Pulldown by the CLK signal rising high and turning on MN_Pulldown. For example, when SEL[0] is in a high state and the CLK input transitions from the low state to the high state, Qp[0] will be pulled down through MN_Pulldown and MN2[0]. The instant at which Qp[0] starts to fall is determined primarily by the turn-on characteristics of MN_Pulldown responding to the input signal CLK transitioning from the low state to the high state, and to a much smaller extent, by the threshold voltage of MN2[0]. In a similar fashion, when the appropriate SEL[n] input is high, each of the other sampling clocks, Qp[n], will start to fall at a time determined primarily by MN_Pulldown responding to the CLK signal transitioning from the low state to the high state. The time will also be determined to a much smaller extent by the threshold voltages of the respective MN2[n] transistor. One advantage of this embodiment is that the start of the high-to-low transition of every sampling clock output Qp[n] in this disclosure is controlled primarily by one single transistor. The secondary effects of the pass-gate transistors, as illustrated by MN2[n], have a much reduced effect on the start of the falling edge.
Referring now to
Referring to
In the embodiment of
Referring again to
When the CLK input transitions for a low state to a high state, pull-down circuitry 504 pulls down Qp[0] or Qp[1], respectively, to the low state of node 503 through MN2[0] or MN2[1] via common node N through a common path through MN_Pulldown. For example, when SEL0 is in a high state and CLK transitions from a low state to a high state, it pulls Qp[0] down to a low state through MN_Pulldown and MN2[0]. The instant at which Qp[0] starts to fall may be determined primarily by the turn-on characteristics of MN_Pulldown responding to the transition of the CLK from the low state to the high state, and to a much smaller extent, by the threshold voltage of MN2[0]. In a similar fashion, when the SEL[1] input is high, Qp[1] will start to fall at a time determined primarily by MN_Pulldown responding to the CLK signal transitioning from the low state to the high state. The time will also be determined to a much smaller extent by the threshold voltages of the MN2[1] transistor. This has the advantage provided by the embodiments of this disclosure in that the start of the high-to-low transition of every sampling clock output Qp[0] or Qp[1]] is controlled primarily by one single transistor MN_Pulldown. The secondary effects of the pass-gate transistors MN2[0] and MN[1] have a much reduced effect on the start of the falling edge.
It should be noted that use of the boost circuits in several of the example embodiments, such as that of
Referring now to
Referring now to
In the discussions of the embodiments above, the switches and transistors are deemed to be ON when the control signal is high, and OFF when the control signal is low, as would be the case for an NMOS transistor, for example. However, it should be noted that the use of complementary switches and complementary drive levels is an equally viable option for implementing the switches. That is, PMOS transistors could replace NMOS transistors with a complementary gate drive circuit, and both NMOS and PMOS transistors can be used in parallel using both polarities of a control signal. Also while the embodiments were each shown with a particular number of sampling channels, one skilled in the art will realize that the embodiments have application to any number of interleaved channels.
Note that the activities discussed above with reference to the FIGURES are applicable to any integrated circuits that involve signal processing, particularly those that can execute specialized software programs, or algorithms, some of which may be associated with processing digitized real-time data. Certain embodiments can relate to multi-DSP signal processing, floating point processing, signal/control processing, fixed-function processing, microcontroller applications, etc.
In certain contexts, the features discussed herein can be applicable to medical systems, scientific instrumentation, wireless and wired communications, radar, industrial process control, audio and video equipment, current sensing, instrumentation (which can be highly precise), and other digital-processing-based systems.
Moreover, certain embodiments discussed above can be provisioned in digital signal processing technologies for medical imaging, patient monitoring, medical instrumentation, and home healthcare. This could include pulmonary monitors, accelerometers, heart rate monitors, pacemakers, etc. Other applications can involve automotive technologies for safety systems (e.g., stability control systems, driver assistance systems, braking systems, infotainment and interior applications of any kind). Furthermore, powertrain systems (for example, in hybrid and electric vehicles) can use high-precision data conversion products in battery monitoring, control systems, reporting controls, maintenance activities, etc.
In yet other example scenarios, the teachings of the present disclosure can be applicable in the industrial markets that include process control systems that help drive productivity, energy efficiency, and reliability. In consumer applications, the teachings of the signal processing circuits discussed above can be used for image processing, auto focus, and image stabilization (e.g., for digital still cameras, camcorders, etc.). Other consumer applications can include audio and video processors for home theater systems, DVD recorders, and high-definition televisions. Yet other consumer applications can involve advanced touch screen controllers (e.g., for any type of portable media device). Hence, such technologies could readily part of smartphones, tablets, security systems, PCs, gaming technologies, virtual reality, simulation training, etc.
In one example embodiment, any number of electrical circuits of the FIGURES may be implemented on a motherboard of an associated electronic device. The motherboard can be a general circuit board that can hold various components of the internal electronic system of the electronic device and, further, provide connectors for other peripherals. More specifically, the motherboard can provide the electrical connections by which the other components of the system can communicate electrically. Any suitable processors (inclusive of digital signal processors, microprocessors, supporting chipsets, etc.), memory elements, etc. can be suitably coupled to the motherboard based on particular configuration needs, processing demands, computer designs, etc. Other components such as external storage, additional sensors, controllers for audio/video display, and peripheral devices may be attached to the motherboard as plug-in cards, via cables, or integrated into the motherboard itself.
In another example embodiment, the electrical circuits of the FIGURES may be implemented as stand-alone modules (e.g., a device with associated components and/or circuitry configured to perform a specific application or function) or implemented as plug-in modules into application specific hardware of electronic devices. Note that particular embodiments of the present disclosure may be readily included in a system on chip (SOC) package, either in part, or in whole. An SOC represents an IC that integrates components of a computer or other electronic system into a single chip. It may contain digital, analog, mixed-signal, and often radio frequency functions: all of which may be provided on a single chip substrate. Other embodiments may include a multi-chip-module (MCM), with a plurality of separate ICs located within a single electronic package and configured to interact closely with each other through the electronic package. In various other embodiments, the amplification functionalities may be implemented in one or more silicon cores in Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), and other semiconductor chips.
It is also imperative to note that all of the specifications, dimensions, and relationships outlined herein (e.g., the number of processors and memory elements, logic operations, etc.) have only been offered for purposes of example and teaching only. Such information may be varied considerably without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure, or the scope of the appended claims. The specifications apply only to one non-limiting example and, accordingly, they should be construed as such. In the foregoing description, example embodiments have been described with reference to particular processor and/or component arrangements. Various modifications and changes may be made to such embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. The description and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense.
Note that with the numerous examples provided herein, interaction may be described in terms of two, three, four, or more electrical components. However, this has been done for purposes of clarity and example only. It should be appreciated that the system can be consolidated in any suitable manner. Along similar design alternatives, any of the illustrated components, modules, and elements of the FIGURES may be combined in various possible configurations, all of which are clearly within the broad scope of this Specification. In certain cases, it may be easier to describe one or more of the functionalities of a given set of flows by only referencing a limited number of electrical elements. It should be appreciated that the electrical circuits of the FIGURES and its teachings are readily scalable and can accommodate a large number of components, as well as more complicated/sophisticated arrangements and configurations. Accordingly, the examples provided should not limit the scope or inhibit the broad teachings of the electrical circuits as potentially applied to a myriad of other architectures.
Note that in this Specification, references to various features (e.g., elements, structures, modules, components, steps, operations, characteristics, etc.) included in “one embodiment”, “example embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “another embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “various embodiments”, “other embodiments”, “alternative embodiment”, and the like are intended to mean that any such features are included in one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, but may or may not necessarily be combined in the same embodiments.
Numerous other changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be ascertained to one skilled in the art and it is intended that the present disclosure encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as falling within the scope of the appended claims. In order to assist the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and, additionally, any readers of any patent issued on this application in interpreting the claims appended hereto, Applicant wishes to note that the Applicant: (a) does not intend any of the appended claims to invoke paragraph six (6) of 35 U.S.C. section 112 as it exists on the date of the filing hereof unless the words “means for” or “step for” are specifically used in the particular claims; and (b) does not intend, by any statement in the specification, to limit this disclosure in any way that is not otherwise reflected in the appended claims.
This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/774,432, filed Mar. 7, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4980583 | Dietz | Dec 1990 | A |
5550503 | Garrity et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5764089 | Partovi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5841299 | De | Nov 1998 | A |
5841304 | Tam | Nov 1998 | A |
5877635 | Lin | Mar 1999 | A |
5886562 | Garrity et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900759 | Tam | May 1999 | A |
5952851 | Yuen | Sep 1999 | A |
6060914 | Nunokawa | May 2000 | A |
6060927 | Lee | May 2000 | A |
6087872 | Partovi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104643 | Merritt | Aug 2000 | A |
6118307 | Shi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118326 | Singer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6160508 | Gustavsson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6316960 | Ye | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6369616 | Lan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407608 | Brown et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6486706 | Ye et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507224 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6542017 | Manganaro | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570410 | Manganaro | May 2003 | B2 |
6771203 | Nairn | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6847239 | Leifso et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6876232 | Yoo | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6900750 | Nairn | May 2005 | B1 |
6924683 | Hayter | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6977528 | Kang et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6992513 | Leifso et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034572 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7126507 | Lee | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135899 | Sancheti et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7138831 | Tobita | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7176742 | Aksin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180349 | Leifso et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7230454 | Welser et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7250885 | Nairn | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7253675 | Aksin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7385440 | Aksin et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7443331 | Cormier, Jr. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7460039 | Jeon | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7511552 | Ali et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7557618 | Wik | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7609756 | Wood | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7772914 | Jung | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7816951 | Lee | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7898288 | Wong | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7969234 | Jung | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8169246 | Malik et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8217824 | Hernes et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8232904 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8294512 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8400206 | Benzer | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8471720 | Turner et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8487795 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8487803 | Garrity | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8525556 | Singh et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8604962 | Lewyn | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8610613 | Ebata et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20030020533 | Price et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20070194956 | Jeon | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070290735 | Ali et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080048901 | Cormier | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080074151 | Kim | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080116963 | Jung | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136443 | Wong | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080191772 | Pickering et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080272952 | Wood | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290921 | Park | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090251188 | Kim | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284288 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090304139 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100109628 | Jung | May 2010 | A1 |
20100238057 | Wood | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253414 | Dedic et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110018589 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018751 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110074614 | Ogawa | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110109369 | Benzer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110210775 | Malik et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110254669 | Dixit et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110309962 | Hernes et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120044004 | Payne et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120119788 | Turner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120206182 | Dally | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212362 | Ebata et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218133 | Thirunakkarasu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120274362 | Doris et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130009796 | Sakiyama et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015990 | Payne et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021078 | Elkin et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033290 | King | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130038365 | Gao et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130099948 | Dedic et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130120179 | Dedic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127648 | Dedic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127649 | Dedic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147647 | Dedic et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162314 | Oh | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130187805 | Garrity | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130229220 | Bardsley et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235669 | Maglione et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130257483 | Bulzacchelli | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130314126 | Garrity | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321059 | Allen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140070847 | Elkins et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140085121 | Ebata et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140125393 | Elkins et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132303 | Segan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
K. Nagaraj et al., A Dual-Mode 700-Msamples/s 6-bit 200-Msamples/s 7-bit A/D Converter in a 0.25 micrometer Digital CMOS Process, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 12, Dec. 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140253353 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61774432 | Mar 2013 | US |