The present invention relates to a cryogenic nozzle. In particular, the present invention relates to controlling the flow rate of a cryogenic liquid through a cryogenic nozzle. A nozzle is a constriction of the fluid line at or near the exit or termination point from which that fluid is ejected into open space that is at a lower pressure than the pressure in the supply line. The fluid passages shown in
Furthermore, the pressure drop causes a portion of the liquid to boil downstream of the valve which can plug the nozzle and/or the nozzle passage, thereby causing flow rate pulsations. It is important to understand in this regard that the conventional method is constrained from increasing the size of the nozzle orifice to quickly vent the boil-off and thus eliminate the resulting flow rate pulsations. In particular, a larger nozzle orifice in the conventional method would require a higher degree of valve restriction to achieve an equivalent range of flow reductions, and thus a larger pressure drop and even more boil-off.
This constraint on increasing the nozzle size in the conventional method leads to another problem in the conventional method when the nozzle and the delivery line thereto must be cooled down from room temperature before start-up. In particular, an oversized nozzle is required to quickly vent the large quantities of vapor that evolve during such a cool-down. Consequently, the conventional method is faced with the dilemma of choosing between the time-consuming task of changing out the oversized nozzle before commencing normal operation, or the complexities of designing a system for temporarily increasing the orifice size of the nozzle during cool-down.
Finally, another problem with the conventional method is the valve itself. In particular, valves that must handle cryogenic liquids are costly and tend to break down. The present invention provides a method for controlling the flow rate of a cryogenic liquid through a nozzle that avoids the above described problems.
Related art includes Kellett, U.S. Pat. No. 5,385,025; Brahmbhatt et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,363,729; Germain et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,070,416; and Kunkel et al, US 2002/0139125.
The present invention is a method and apparatus for controlling the flow rate of a cryogenic liquid through a nozzle. The flow rate is controlled with a “throttling” gas having a pressure greater than or equal to the pressure of the cryogenic liquid, a temperature greater than the temperature of the cryogenic liquid; and a boiling point less than or equal to the temperature of the cryogenic liquid.
Specifically this invention provides a process comprising providing a cryogenic liquid; providing a throttling gas having a pressure greater than or equal to the pressure of the cryogenic liquid, a temperature greater than the temperature of the cryogenic liquid; and a boiling point less than or equal to the temperature of the cryogenic liquid; introducing the cryogenic liquid and the throttling gas into a contact zone and contacting the liquid and the throttling gas to form a resulting fluid; and discharging the fluid through a nozzle while continuing to introduce the cryogenic liquid and the throttling gas into the contact zone. The method includes the step of continuing the gas and liquid flows for a period of time and adjusting the mass flow rate, and/or temperature, and/or pressure of the gas as desired between from maximum flow to no gas flow to adjust or maintain the mass flow rate of the cryogenic liquid.
In the process of the present invention, the cryogenic liquid and throttling gas are introduced into a contact zone where they are contacted to form a resulting fluid. The resulting fluid is discharged through the nozzle while continuing to introduce additional cryogenic liquid and throttling gas or additional cryogenic liquid, or additional throttling gas, from one or more sources upstream of the contact zone, into the contact zone. In one embodiment of the process of the present invention, the process further comprises controlling the fluid's discharge mass flow rate and the mass ratio of the discharged fluid's liquid component to its gaseous component as a function of the throttling gas pressure.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus comprises a conduit having an upstream end and a downstream end in head-on flow communication with a nozzle. The apparatus further comprises a first supply line that connects a pressurized gas supply line to the conduit and a second supply line that connects the cryogenic liquid supply line to the conduit. The discharge end of the gas supply line is in head-on flow communication with the upstream end of the conduit, while the liquid supply line is in 45-135 degree flow communication with the upstream end of the conduit (measured from the conduit).
In a second apparatus embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus comprises a conduit having a first feed end and a second feed end which may be an opposing feed end, and a nozzle comprising a row of openings (or optionally a slit) along at least a portion of the length of the wall of the conduit. The apparatus further comprises a first supply line having a discharge end in head-on flow communication with at least one of the feed ends of the conduit, and a second supply line having a discharge end in 45-135° flow communication with at least one of the feed ends of the conduit. The angle is measured from the conduit. In one embodiment of the second apparatus, the first supply line that is in head-on communication with the conduit connects a pressurized gas supply to the conduit, while the second supply line that is in 45-135° flow communication or 90-135° flow communication with the conduit connects a cryogenic liquid supply to the conduit.
In a third apparatus embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus comprises an annular space defined by an outer conduit concentrically surrounding an inner conduit containing a plurality of openings in its wall. The annular space has a first feed end and an opposing feed end which are respectively adjacent to a first inlet end and an opposing inlet end of the inner conduit. The apparatus further comprises a nozzle comprising a row of openings (or optionally a slit) along at least a portion of the length of the wall of the outer conduit, a first supply line in flow communication with at least one of the feed ends of the annular space, and a second supply line in flow communication with at least one of the inlet ends of the inner conduit. In one embodiment of the third apparatus, the first supply line in flow communication with annular space connects a pressurized gas supply to the annular space, while the second supply line in flow communication with the inner conduit connects a cryogenic liquid supply to the inner conduit.
This invention further provides an apparatus comprising at least one cryogenic spray device each having at least one gas inlet in fluid communication with a contact zone; and at least one cryogenic liquid inlet in fluid communication with the contact zone, the contact zone being in fluid communication with at least one nozzle; and a gas supply control in fluid communication with each of the at least one gas inlet; wherein the gas supply control is adapted to enable adjustment of at least one of temperature and pressure of gas supplied to each of the at least one gas inlet to achieve a first desired flow rate of cryogenic liquid through the at least one nozzle when a source of cryogenic liquid at a first pressure is provided to each of the at least one cryogenic liquid inlet.
This invention further provides an apparatus comprising: an outer conduit; an inner conduit positioned within the outer conduit and defining an annular space between the outer conduit and the inner conduit, the inner conduit having at least one opening positioned to enable the cryogenic liquid to flow radially from the inner conduit into the annular space; at least one nozzle formed on the outer conduit, each of the at least one nozzle being in fluid communication with the annular space; a first gas inlet in fluid communication with the outer conduit, the first gas inlet being adapted to be connected to a pressurized gas supply; and a first cryogenic liquid inlet in fluid communication with the inner conduit, the first cryogenic liquid inlet being adapted to be connected to a cryogenic liquid supply.
This invention further provides an apparatus comprising: a conduit having an upstream end and a downstream end; a nozzle in head-on flow communication with the downstream end; a first inlet that is adapted to be connected to a pressurized gas supply line, the first inlet having a discharge end in head-on flow communication with the upstream end of the nozzle; and a second inlet that is adapted to connect to a cryogenic liquid supply line, the second inlet having an outlet end in 45-135 degree flow communication with the upstream end.
This invention further provides a method comprising: supplying a cryogenic liquid at a first pressure and first temperature to a contact zone that is in fluid communication with at least one nozzle; supplying a gas at a second pressure and second temperature to the contact zone, the second pressure being no less than the first pressure, the second temperature being greater than the first temperature, and the gas having a boiling point at 1 atm that is no greater than the first temperature; regulating the gas supplied to the contact zone in order to achieve a desired flow rate of cryogenic liquid through each of the at least one nozzle.
As used herein and in the claims, the following terms shall be defined as follows:
The present invention is based on Applicants' discovery that when a cryogenic liquid and a pressurized “throttling” gas are introduced into a “contact zone” and the resulting fluid discharged through a nozzle, the discharged fluid's liquid-to-gaseous ratio, and therefore the flow rate of cryogenic liquid, can be controlled as a function of the pressure of the throttling gas. In this fashion, the present invention can alternate between an impingement cooling functionality, when the discharge fluid may comprise a majority (51-100%) or higher percentage up to 100% liquid (for example, 75-100% liquid) and a blast-cleaning functionality when the discharge fluid may comprise a majority (51-100%) or higher percentage up to 100% gas (for example, 75-100% gas), without any changes other than to the pressure of the throttling gas (hereafter, the “hybrid functionality” feature).
Furthermore, in a “spray tube” embodiment of the present invention, Applicants have developed a method for controlling the “spray profile” of the discharged fluid's liquid component as a function of the throttling gas pressure (hereafter, the “spray profile” feature). In this fashion, the present invention can match a substrate's “cooling profile” (such as in a cold rolling application where the middle of the metal strip requires more cooling than the ends) or even track a dynamic heat load that is imparted to a substrate (such as in a thermal spraying application, for example, disclosed in “Thermal Deposition Coating Method” Ser. No. 11/389,308 filed Mar. 27, 2006, claiming priority to provisional application 60/670,497, filed Apr. 12, 2005, entitled “Control Method for Thermal Deposition Coating Operations, which are both incorporated herein in their entireties by reference herein.
In general, increases in the throttling gas pressure between a pressure equal to the cryogenic liquid pressure and a maximum gas pressure result in proportional decreases in the discharged fluid's liquid-to-gaseous ratio. The composition of the discharge fluid may vary between 100 percent liquid to 100 percent gas. Such increases in the gas pressure will result in a proportional decrease in the total mass flow rate of the discharged fluid. These relationships are discussed in more detail below.
An important advantage of the present invention is ability to control the discharged fluid's liquid component is achieved without a conventional flow-restricting valve and the associated pressure drop. Consequently, unlike the conventional methods, the liquid spray velocity in the present invention does not decay as the liquid component of the discharge is reduced (hereafter, the “spray velocity” feature).
Another important consequence of the absence of the conventional flow-restricting valve in the present invention is the ability to use larger nozzle sizes than are possible with conventional methods. Consequently, the nozzle can be increased to a size that will quickly respond to gas pressure increases in terms of achieving the desired liquid-to-gaseous discharge ratio (hereafter, the “rapid response” feature). Moreover, this increased nozzle size also functions to quickly vent the large quantities of vapor that are generated when the system must be started-up from ambient temperature (hereafter, the “rapid start-up” feature).
The above hybrid functionality, spray profile, spray velocity, rapid response and rapid start-up features make the present invention uniquely suitable to a wide range of applications including, but not limited to, the following:
(i) a thermal spraying application, particularly using high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) or plasma spraying systems;
(ii) welding; fusing; hardening; nitriding; carburizing; laser glazing; induction heat treating; brazing; extrusion; casting; finish-rolling; forging; embossing; engraving; patterning; printing, scribing or slitting of metal strip, tape, or tube; cryogenic cutting and grinding of metal and non-metal components; and
(iii) processing, surfacing, or assembly in the metals, ceramics, aerospace, medical, electronics, and optical industries.
In addition to the pressure of the throttling gas, the temperature of the throttling gas also plays a role in the present invention. In particular, the boil-off that is generated when the throttling gas contacts the cryogenic liquid contributes to the throttling effect. Typically, the temperature of the throttling gas introduced into the contact zone is ambient (as this ensures a suitable boil-off without the need to either heat or cool the throttling gas) and the gas pressure functions as the preferred “control lever” in the present invention. However, in terms of regulating the boil-off contribution to the throttling effect, the gas temperature could also function as the control lever, either by itself (i.e. such that the gas pressure is held constant), or in combination with adjustments in gas pressure. Also, noting that any amount of heat added to a saturated cryogenic liquid will cause at least some boil-off, the temperature of the throttling gas is preferably greater than the temperature of the cryogenic liquid. Finally, regarding the temperature, it is possible to reduce the pressure required for any particular throttling rate by using a temperature higher than ambient, but if the temperature is too high, the ability to fine tune the liquid component as a function of the gas pressure can be compromised.
In order to ensure the throttling gas does not condense when contacted with the cryogenic liquid, the throttling gas boiling point should be less than or equal to the cryogenic liquid's boiling point. Consequently, if the cryogenic liquid is saturated nitrogen, the throttling gas can comprise nitrogen but not argon, while if the cryogenic liquid is saturated argon, the throttling gas can comprise either nitrogen or argon. Typically, cost and availability factors favor liquid nitrogen as the cryogenic liquid and gaseous nitrogen as the throttling gas. Also, noting that the oxygen component of air could inadvertently condense in the contact zone and create a flammability concern, air is typically undesired as the throttling gas. Finally, regarding the choice of fluids in the present invention, note liquid carbon dioxide is typically unacceptable as the cryogenic liquid because it freezes on expansion and may form ice plugs inside nozzle.
The exact relationship between the throttling gas pressure and (i) the ratio of the discharged fluid's liquid-to-gaseous mass flow rates (hereafter, “DL/G”), and (ii) the total mass flow rate of the discharged fluid (hereafter, “DF”) will depend on a number of factors including, but no limited to, the temperature of the throttling gas as noted above, the choice of the cryogenic liquid and gas, the size of the nozzle and contact zone, and the configuration between the nozzle and contact zone. In addition, since the throttling gas can be expected to incur at least a moderate pressure drop in the supply line connecting the pressurized supply of the throttling gas to the contact zone, this pressure drop must also be taken into account. Accordingly, the exact relationships should be experimentally determined for any particular system. Described below, however, are the observed relationships based on Applicant's experimentation with saturated liquid nitrogen as the cryogenic liquid and ambient temperature nitrogen as the throttling gas over a range of liquid and gas pressures between 10 and 350 psig, and a range of nozzle sizes and contact zone configurations. Note the relationship between the throttling gas pressure and the introduction rates of the liquid and gaseous nitrogen into the contact zone (hereafter, “FL”, and “FG” respectively) are also included as these relationships also provide insights into the present invention as further discussed below.
The relationships for one embodiment of the invention referenced above are as follows. With respect to increases in the throttling gas pressure between a gas pressure equal to the cryogenic liquid pressure (hereafter, the “un-throttled condition”), and a gas pressure equal to 1.05-1.3 times the cryogenic liquid pressure gage (hereafter, the “fully throttled condition”), such gas pressure increases resulted in:
(i) proportional decreases in DL/G between 1.0 and nearly zero;
(ii) proportional decreases in DF between the maximum DF that occurs in the un-throttled condition, and the minimum DF that occurs in the throttled condition which is a fraction or a small fraction of the maximum DF;
(iii) proportional decreases in FL between the maximum FL that occurs in the un-throttled condition, and the minimum FL that occurs in the throttled condition which is a small fraction, e.g. 10-15%, of the maximum FL for some embodiments; and
(iv) proportional increases in FG between the minimum FG that occurs in the un-throttled condition which is equal to about 0-11% of the maximum FL, and the maximum FG that occurs in the throttled condition which is equal to 10-35% of the maximum FL for many embodiments.
In alternative embodiments, the ratio between the gas pressure and the liquid pressure at their respective inlets into the contact zone of the nozzle may be any value greater than 1 or may vary between greater than 1 to 100.
As suggested above, the above relationships provide a number of insights into the present invention as follows:
(i) The gas pressure to achieve the fully throttled condition is advantageously modest, namely only 1.05-1.30 times the pressure of the cryogenic liquid on a gage pressure basis. The higher gas supply pressures are even more effective but not necessary if the nozzle is designed within the other specifications described here, e.g. the preferred impingement angle of the gas and liquid streams inside the nozzle conduits. Also, pursuant to (iv) above, and noting the throttling gas pressure and throttling gas introduction rate will always directly correspond for a specific design and geometry, this translates into a modest throttling gas introduction rate required to achieve the fully throttled condition, namely only about 10-35% of the cryogenic liquid introduction rate that occurs in the un-throttled condition.
(ii) Pursuant to (iii) above, the cryogenic liquid feed rate is not zero in the fully throttled condition as might be expected, but is instead about 10-15% of the flow rate of the cryogenic liquid introduction rate that occurs in the un-throttled condition. This means that the boil-off is contributing to the throttling effect even when the discharged fluid contains no liquid. Also, this has the advantage of facilitating the present invention's rapid response feature even from the fully throttled condition since the cryogenic liquid introduction rate does not have to be turned off and re-started.
(iii) Pursuant to (iv) above, note the throttling gas feed rate can be as high as 11% before a departure (or at least a significant departure) from the un-throttled condition occurs. This is related to the initial build-up of the throttling gas in the supply line and contact zone.
Applicant's experimentation provided additional characteristics specific to the two broad categories of the configurations between the contact zone and nozzle in the present invention. In the first category, hereafter the “shot gun” configuration, the contact zone comprises a conduit which discharges the fluid head-on through a single opening nozzle. In the second category, hereafter the “spray tube” configuration, the contact zone comprises a conduit that discharges the fluid in a radial direction from the conduit through a nozzle along the longitudinal length of the wall of the conduit that consists of either a row of openings or a slit. Several basic variations of the spray tube configuration are disclosed herein. In one variation, (hereafter, the “single tube” variation), the cryogenic liquid and throttling gas are introduced into one, or typically both, ends of the contact zone-comprising conduit. In another variation (hereafter, the “tube-in-tube” variation), the throttling gas is introduced into one or both ends of the annular space defined by concentric tubes, while cryogenic liquid is introduced into the annular space through a series of openings in the inner tube that are in radial flow communication with the contact zone-comprising annular space. The characteristics specific to each of these configurations are detailed in the following discussion of the figures.
The embodiment of the present invention shown in
(i) from a process standpoint, the cryogenic liquid and throttling gas impinge each other upon their introduction into the mixing at an angle y that may be any value, for example, between 0 to 360° or from 0 to 270°, or 0° to 180°, but for some embodiments is from 45° to 135° or from 45° to 90° (and preferably 90° as shown in
(iii) from an apparatus standpoint, the length x of the contact zone conduit 31c (identified by the cross-hatching in
Note that the Figures show embodiments that have either the liquid or gas lines head on with the discharge end of the nozzle. The nozzle of the invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, and this invention provides that the liquid and gas conduits within the nozzle can be configured so that neither is in head on flow with the discharge end of the nozzle. For examples, the cryogenic liquid conduit and the gas conduit and the contact zone could be arranged in the nozzle 120° from each other, or the cryogenic liquid conduit and the gas conduit could be 90° apart and the contact zone could be located 135° from both of those conduits. In alternate embodiments, two or more gas conduits could be provided into each cryogenic liquid conduit in a nozzle. It is preferred when two or more gas conduits are used within the nozzle that they are spaced 45° to 90° from the cryogenic liquid conduit, although any angles may be used as described earlier.
(i) from a process standpoint, the throttling gas is in head-on flow communication with the conduit's upstream end; and
(ii) from an apparatus standpoint, the conduit of the pressurized gas supply G is in head-on flow communication with the contact zone, while the conduit of the cryogenic liquid supply L is in 45°-135° flow communication, or 90°-135° flow communication with the contact zone (and preferably 90° as shown in
(i) the shot gun configuration between contact zone 33 (further identified by the cross-hatching) and nozzle N is vertically oriented;
(ii) the contact zone, the gas supply line G1, and the cryogenic liquid supply line L1 all comprise ¼ inch diameter carbon-fluorine polymer tubing (which retains a degree of flexibility even when cooled to cryogenic temperatures) and are shielded from mechanical damage by a ¾ inch diameter flexible stainless steel hose H1; and
(iii) a soft foamy plug SP is used at the entry point to the stainless steel hose to prevent accumulation of condensed water inside the hose. Alternate materials known to a person of skill in the art can be used.
The fluid passages shown in
The function of the respective first solenoid valve Gv1a through Gv5a in each pair is to open or close the flow of gas needed in the fully throttled condition. The function of the respective second valve Gv1b through Gv5b in each pair is to open or close the flow of gas to the respective manually adjusted valves Gv1c through Gv5c. The opening of the manually adjusted valve is adjusted by the operators beforehand in order to select the throttling gas flow rate that corresponds to the desired ratio of the discharged fluid's liquid-to-gaseous ratio. This desired ratio reflects the normal cooling flow rate which can be rapidly reduced to zero, and then quickly re-started by opening or closing the respective Gv1a through Gv5a valve. If all five branches are not needed in a given cooling and blasting operation, both the corresponding gas and liquid valves stay closed. An electric, programmable controller PLC is housed in the ambient temperature box to control the desired valve opening and closing sequence and is connected to the valves, a control panel and, optionally, to remote temperature and/or cleaning sensors. Downstream of the gas controlling valves, the gas lines fluidly communicate with the respective cooling lines H1 through H5 via respective ports p1 through p5.
The embodiment shown in
After a substrate part has been processed by the nozzle's cooling functionality, the gas-blasting functionality can be used to increase the part's temperature to room temperature to avoid condensation of ambient moisture thereon. Although this evaluation uses the cooling lines identically controlled by the controller PLC based on the thermal input from external temperature sensors, the system may comprise any number of differently sized cooling lines from one to as many as practical, e.g. twenty. Also, each cooling line may be controlled by the PLC independently from the other cooling lines and use its own thermal input.
The embodiment shown in
(i) the contact zone comprises a conduit 35 having a first feed end 35a and an opposing feed end 35b;
(ii) the nozzle comprises either a row of openings (as shown in
(iii) as supplied by a supply line in flow communication with a cryogenic liquid supply, the cryogenic liquid L1 is introduced into the conduit through at least one of the conduit's feed ends (and typically both feed ends as shown by L2 in
(iv) as supplied by a supply line in flow communication with a pressurized gas supply, the throttling gas G1 is also introduced into the conduit through at least one of the conduit's feed ends (and typically both ends as shown by G2 in
(v) the fluid is discharged through the nozzle in a radial direction from the conduit as represented by spray profile 85 in
(i) from a process standpoint, the cryogenic liquid and throttling gas impinge each other at 45°-135° or 45°-90° (and preferably 90° as shown in
(ii) from an apparatus standpoint, the supply line connecting the contact zone to the pressurized gas supply is in head-on flow communication with the feed end(s) of the contact zone, while the supply line connecting the upstream end of the contact zone to the cryogenic liquid supply is in 45°-135° or 90°-135° flow communication with the feed end(s) of the contact zone (and preferably 90° as shown in
(iii) also from an apparatus standpoint, the ratio of the conduit's length to its diameter may be between 4 and 20 (noting at ratios larger than 20, the conduit may become too long for a sufficient degree of impingement contact to occur in the middle area of the conduit).
The embodiment of the present invention shown in
(i) the contact zone comprises an annular space 36 defined by an outer conduit 20 concentrically surrounding an inner conduit 10a;
(ii) the annular space has a first feed end and a second (an opposing) feed end;
(iii) the inner conduit has a first inlet end and a second (an opposing) inlet end which are adjacent to, respectively, the first feed end and the opposing feed end of the annular space,
(iv) the inner conduit contains a plurality of openings 40 in its wall for uniformly dispersing the cryogenic liquid into the annular space as represented by streams 50 in
(v) the nozzle comprises a row of openings 60 as shown in
(vi) as supplied by a supply line in flow communication with a pressurized gas supply, the throttling gas G1 is introduced into the annular space through at least one of the feed ends of the annular space (and typically both ends as shown by G2 in
(vii) as supplied by a supply line in flow communication with a cryogenic liquid supply, the cryogenic liquid L1 is introduced into the inner conduit through at least one of the inlet ends of the inner conduit (and sometimes both ends as shown by L2 in
(viii) the cryogenic liquid is dispersed into the annular space through the plurality of openings contained in the wall of the inner conduit in a radial direction from the inner conduit; and
(ix) the fluid 70 is discharged through the nozzle in a radial direction from the outer conduit as represented by spray profile 86a in
The tube-in-tube variation of the spray tube embodiment embodies Applicant's observation that the fine tuning ability of the spray tube embodiment is increased by effecting the impingement contact between the liquid and the gas along the length of the annular space (or at least along the length in which the gas is able to maintain it's velocity). This also enables an increase in the contact zone's length to diameter ratio from the 4-20 range of the single tube variation to a range of 4-80. For different embodiments, the range of the minimum diameter and length of the contact zone is between 1 and 80 times the minimum diameter.
The inner and outer conduits in the tube-in tube variation of the spray tube configuration can be made of stainless steel, aluminum, copper, or cryogenically compatible polymers such fiber-reinforced epoxy composites, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and the like. The typical diameter of the inner conduit may vary between 1 mm and 25 mm while the typical diameter of the outer conduit may vary between 3 mm and 75 mm. The typical ratio between the outer conduit diameter to the inner conduit diameter may vary between 2 and 8. As noted above, the typical length-to-diameter ratio with respect to the outer conduit may vary between 4 and 80. The wall thickness of the inner conduit depends on the material of construction selected and may be as small as practical during device fabrication but sufficient to hold the pressure of the fluid filling this conduit. Typical wall thickness preferably ranges may range between 1%-10% of the inner conduit diameter. There is no need for any special orientation of the plurality of openings in the inner conduit as long as their distribution inside the annular space is relatively uniform.
The nozzle openings in the outer conduit are preferably aligned in one specific direction in order to be able to discharge fluid in that direction. The wall thickness of the outer conduit is preferably selected to provide a sufficiently long expansion channel for the fluid exiting the nozzle openings. Such a sufficiently long channel depends on various operating parameters, but it is typically selected by comparing its length, i.e. the outer wall thickness, to its diameter or bore. The typical length-to-diameter ratio of the nozzle openings varies between 3 and 25. In the embodiments in
The embodiment shown in
(i) The inner conduit made of stainless steel and having the inner diameter of 0.335 inches, an outer diameter of 0.375 inches, and length of 35.5 inches, and containing 94 holes, each having an inner diameter of 0.03 inches.
(ii) The outer tube was made of a fiber-reinforced, cryo-compatible epoxy having an inner diameter equal to 0.745 inches, an outer diameter equal to 1.1 inches and a length equal to 34.5 inches, and containing 83 nozzle-openings along a straight line, each having an inner diameter equal to 0.035 inches and spaced from another using a 0.35 inch step.
(iii) The ratio between the outer tube outer diameter and the inner tube outer diameter was 2.9. The length-to-diameter ratio of the outer tube was 31.4. The wall thickness of the inner tube was 5% of its outer diameter. The outer tube wall thickness was 4.5 mm, and the length-to-diameter ratio of each nozzle-opening was 5. The ratio of the total cross-sectional surface area of the nozzle openings in the outer conduit to the total cross-sectional surface area of the openings in the inner conduit was 1.2.
As will be described in greater detail herein, the tube-in-tube variation of the spray tube provides that ability to adjust the “spray profile” of the spray tube. The spray profile is defined by the collective liquid component discharges from each of the nozzle openings. In
In
In this embodiment, the spray bar 210 includes one cryogenic liquid inlet 212 and two throttling gas inlets 214, 216. A cryogenic liquid supply line 224 supplies LIN from the tank 218 to the cryogenic liquid inlet 212. A solenoid valve 226 turns the supply of LIN on and off.
A gas supply line 228 supplies throttling gas from the tank 220 to the spray bar 210. The gas supply line 228 splits into two branches 230, 232, each of which is connected to one of the throttling gas inlets 214, 216. An adjustable valve 234, 236 is located on each of the branches 230, 232 to enable adjustment of the downstream gas pressure and flowrate in each of the branches 230, 232. Optionally, a solenoid valve (not shown) could be provided in series with each of the adjustable valves 234, 236 to enable gas flow to be turned on and off without having to readjust the adjustable valves 234, 236. When operated, the gas throttling streams 230, 232 control (increase, decrease or maintain) the liquid flow rate, blasting function, and liquid spray pattern as discussed above.
A gas purge line 238 is tapped into the supply line 228 upstream from the branches 230, 232. The gas purge line 238 includes a solenoid valve 240 and two branches 242, 244 which are located downstream from the solenoid valve 240 and each connect to one of the gas inlets 214, 216. When operated, the gas purge line 238, and its branches 242 and 244 supply to the spray bar 210 de-icing gas which prevents frosting of the cryogenic fluid spraying nozzles.
In
Alternatively, the PLC 207 could adjust the spray profile in response to signals from a position sensor (not shown ) that tracks the position of the spray gun 205 or the PLC 207 could be pre-programmed to follow a timed sequence of spray profiles which are synchronized with movement of the spray gun 205.
The cylindrical substrate 201 may, also, be a roll or another forming tool used for rolling metal or nonmetallic strip, profiling such strip and performing similar, continuous forming and shaping operations. The roll or the forming tool heats up during operation and picks undesired particulate debris on its surface. The spray bar 210 discharging the cryogenic fluid in a specific profile 209 may be used to blast clean the debris from the substrate surface and/or to cool the surface. For cleaning, anyone of the spray patterns from the nozzles shown in
Referring to
This invention is not limited to the embodiments shown. Nozzles comprising multiple gas and liquid supply streams and lines can be used, and other modifications can be made to the embodiments shown, that are still within the scope of this invention.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional U.S. Application No. 60/840,616 filed Aug. 28, 2006, and 60/851189 filed Oct. 12, 2006, both entitled “Nozzle, System, and Method for Cryogenic Impingement” which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1051905 | McCord | Feb 1913 | A |
2986891 | McMahon | Jun 1961 | A |
3110156 | Niemann | Nov 1963 | A |
3395548 | Yearwood | Aug 1968 | A |
3431745 | Harper et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3695050 | Bancroft | Oct 1972 | A |
3703991 | Eustis et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3830078 | Read | Aug 1974 | A |
4011734 | Jones | Mar 1977 | A |
4083220 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4240784 | Dauvergne | Dec 1980 | A |
4252844 | Nesgood et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4262511 | Boisvert et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4392367 | Bald | Jul 1983 | A |
4473186 | Alperin | Sep 1984 | A |
4498304 | Guilhem | Feb 1985 | A |
4749337 | Dickinson et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4753093 | Siemon et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4806150 | Alvarez et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4836446 | Chanel | Jun 1989 | A |
4857076 | Pearson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4874560 | Titmas | Oct 1989 | A |
5134961 | Giles et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5188296 | Duez et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5242474 | Herbst et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250780 | Hansz et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5327763 | Kramer et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5344478 | Zurecki et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5385025 | Kellett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5517842 | Ginzburg | May 1996 | A |
5730806 | Caimi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738281 | Zurecki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755128 | Tippins et al. | May 1998 | A |
5799523 | Seidel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5942037 | Wagener et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5989647 | Remy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6070416 | Germain et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093310 | Swan | Jul 2000 | A |
6202525 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226996 | Weber et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6363729 | Brahmbhatt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378778 | Lurås | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6648053 | Allor et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6675622 | Plicht et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6740624 | Hoste et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6860950 | Franz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874344 | Junius et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6916416 | Adamson et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7054764 | Williams et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7167099 | Kadwell et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7252024 | Zurecki et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20020013925 | Senshu | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020139125 | Kunkel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020189413 | Zurecki et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040001182 | Dyner | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040109692 | Plante | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040245373 | Behrens | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050011201 | Zurecki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050160615 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060029742 | Cesak et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060220888 | Germouni et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228465 | Zurecki | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070084263 | Zurecki | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070164130 | Jackson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200998731 | Jan 2008 | CN |
1995-3230 | May 2001 | DE |
0 136 921 | Apr 1985 | EP |
0 249 186 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0249186 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 610 300 | May 1996 | EP |
0 960 955 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1 038 987 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1564042 | Apr 1969 | FR |
1418400 | Dec 1975 | GB |
2 199 263 | Jul 1988 | GB |
2294217 | Apr 1996 | GB |
02-066415 | Mar 1990 | JP |
05-050121 | Mar 1993 | JP |
08117644 | May 1996 | JP |
2000-210837 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-096301 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2006337326 | Dec 2006 | JP |
710705 | Jan 1980 | SU |
WO 8912116 | Dec 1989 | WO |
WO 9318869 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9719773 | May 1997 | WO |
9719773 | Jun 1997 | WO |
9719773 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9826104 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9961674 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0075558 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 02083971 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02083972 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02087803 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03035322 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2006074875 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jones, Paul D. A., et al.; “Control of Temperature Profile for a Spray Deposition Process”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology IEEE USA; vol. 11, No. 5, Sep. 2003; pp. 656-667; XP002392922. |
Jones, P.D.A., et al., “Estimating the Surface Temperature Profile from a Sequence of Partial Thermal Images”; Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., USA; vol. 4571; 2001 pp. 199-207; XP002392923. |
Pathirana, Pubudu, et al., “Control of Average Temperature in a Spray Deposition Process”, IEEE Conf. Control Appl. Proc; IEEE Conference on Control Applications Proceedings 2002; vol. 2; pp. 1004-1009; XP 002392924. |
Nuse, J.D. et al., “Surface Finishing of Tungsten Carbide Cobalt Coatings Applied by HVOF for Chrome Replacement Applications”, Aerospace/Airline Plating and Metal Finishing Forum, Mar. 27, 2000, pp. 1-12, Cincinatti, OH. |
Stokes, J., et al., “HVOF System Definition to Maximise the Thickness of Formed Components”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies (AMPT '99). Dublin, Ireland, Aug. 3-6, 1999, pp. 775-784. |
Lucchese, P., et al., “Optimization of Robotic Trajectories in the Atmosphere and Temperature Controlled Plasma Spray Process on Ceramic Substrate Using Heat Flow Modelling”, Proceedings of the 1993 National Thermal Spray Conference, Jun. 7-11, 1993, pp. 231-239, Anaheim, CA. |
Nguyen, T., et al., “An Assessment of the Applicability of Cold Air and Oil Mist in Surface Grinding”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 140, 2003, pp. 224-230, Sydney, Australia. |
Yang, Y.P., et al., “A Hot-Cracking Mitigation Technique for Welding High-Strength Aluminum Alloy”, Welding Research Supplement, Jan. 2000, pp. 9s-17s. |
Brian M. Pikkula et al., “Cryogen Spray Cooling: Effects of Droplet Size and Spray Density on Heat Removal,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 28:103-112 (2001). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080048047 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60840616 | Aug 2006 | US | |
60851189 | Oct 2006 | US |