The present invention relates to removing material from microfeature workpieces using mechanical and chemical-mechanical processes that abrade the surface of the microfeature workpieces.
One class of processes for removing materials from microfeature workpieces uses abrasive particles to abrade the workpieces either with or without a liquid solution. For example, mechanical and chemical-mechanical processes (collectively “CMP”) remove material from the surface of microfeature workpieces in the production of microelectronic devices and other products.
The head 30 has a lower surface 32 to which a microfeature workpiece 12 may be attached, or the workpiece 12 may be attached to a resilient pad 34 in the head 30. The head 30 may be a weighted, free-floating wafer carrier, or the head 30 may be attached to an actuator assembly 36 (shown schematically) to impart rotational motion to the workpiece 12 (indicated by arrow J) and/or reciprocate the workpiece 12 back and forth (indicated by arrow I).
The planarizing pad 40 and a planarizing solution 44 define a planarizing medium that mechanically and/or chemically-mechanically removes material from the surface of the workpiece 12. The planarizing solution 44 may be a conventional CMP slurry with abrasive particles and chemicals that etch and/or oxidize the surface of the microfeature workpiece 12, or the planarizing solution 44 may be a “clean” non-abrasive planarizing solution without abrasive particles. In most CMP applications, abrasive slurries with abrasive particles are used on non-abrasive polishing pads, and clean non-abrasive solutions without abrasive particles are used on fixed-abrasive polishing pads.
To planarize the microfeature workpiece 12 with the CMP machine 10, the head 30 presses the workpiece 12 face-down against the planarizing pad 40. More specifically, the head 30 generally presses the microfeature workpiece 12 against the planarizing solution 44 on a planarizing surface 42 of the planarizing pad 40, and the platen 20 and/or the head 30 moves to rub the workpiece 12 against the planarizing surface 42.
Conventional CMP processes that use abrasive slurries may not produce adequate results because it is difficult to consistently produce a uniformly planar surface across the workpiece. The planarity across the workpiece is a function of several parameters; one such parameter is the distribution of abrasive particles between the workpiece 12 and the planarizing surface 42. The distribution of abrasive particles, however, is difficult to control because the leading edge of the workpiece 12 wipes the planarizing solution 44 from the planarizing surface 42. As a result, there is generally less planarizing solution 44 and thus fewer abrasive particles at center of the workpiece 12 compared to the edge of the workpiece 12. The center region of the workpiece may accordingly have a different removal rate than the edge region.
A useful technique to improve control of the distribution of abrasive particles is to use fixed-abrasive polishing pads. Fixed-abrasive pads have a matrix and abrasive particles attached to the matrix. For example, several existing fixed-abrasive pads have a resin binder and small abrasive particles suspended in the binder in a desired distribution. The abrasive particles at the surface of the fixed-abrasive pad are held in place by the matrix such that the center and the edge of the workpiece consistently experience a well-controlled distribution of abrasive particles.
Fixed-abrasive pads, however, may have several drawbacks. One drawback of using a fixed-abrasive pad is that the workpiece can skip, chatter, and/or stick relative to the surface of the fixed-abrasive pad. This can produce scratches or other defects in the workpiece. Therefore, even though fixed-abrasive pads are promising, additional development is needed to use them for the production of many types of microfeature devices.
A. Overview
The present invention is directed toward machines and methods for removing materials from microfeature workpieces using fixed-abrasive mediums. Many embodiments of the invention are described in connection with mechanically and/or chemically-mechanically removing materials from microfeature workpieces, but these embodiments can also include back-grinding or other processes that abrade materials from workpieces. As described herein, several embodiments of the invention control the frictional force at the interface between the workpiece and a fixed-abrasive medium to avoid skipping, chatter, sticking, and other undesirable interaction between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium. This is expected to reduce scratches or other defects on the surface of the workpiece that may be associated with the fixed-abrasive particles.
One embodiment of a method for removing material from a microfeature workpiece comprises rubbing the workpiece against a surface of a fixed-abrasive medium having a matrix and abrasive particles attached to the matrix. This method further includes vibrating an interface between the workpiece and the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium while rubbing the workpiece against the surface to maintain a frictional force between the workpiece and the surface in a desired range.
The vibrating procedure, for example, can comprise generating relative motion between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium in a direction transverse to the interface between the workpiece and the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium. This can be accomplished by oscillating at least one of the workpiece, the fixed-abrasive medium, a head in which the workpiece is held, and/or a support upon which the fixed-abrasive medium is mounted. These components can be oscillated by moving an actuator at a frequency that maintains the frictional force between the workpiece and the surface in the desired range. In other embodiments, the vibration procedure can comprise reducing a down-force applied to the workpiece. The vibrating procedure can further comprise controlling the frictional force from exceeding a level at which deceleration between the workpiece and the surface exceeds a limit, or the vibrating procedure can further comprise controlling the friction force from exceeding a level at which a relative velocity between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium falls below a limit.
Another embodiment of a method for removing material from a microfeature workpiece comprises rubbing the workpiece against a fixed-abrasive medium having a matrix and abrasive particles attached to the matrix such that the abrasive particles are located at an interface between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium. This method further includes oscillating at least one of the workpiece, the fixed-abrasive medium, the head at which the workpiece is held, and/or a support upon which the fixed-abrasive medium is mounted to control a frictional force at the interface between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium. Many embodiments of the method are performed on a microfeature workpiece having features with critical dimensions not greater than 1 μm (e.g., 30-120 nanometers).
Another embodiment of a method for removing material from a microfeature workpiece comprises rubbing the workpiece against a surface of a fixed-abrasive medium having a matrix and abrasive particles attached to the matrix, and sensing a parameter indicative of frictional force at an interface between the workpiece and the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium. This method continues by moving at least one of the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium relative to each other in a direction transverse to the interface based on the parameter. For example, the workpiece and/or the fixed-abrasive medium can be vibrated or oscillated to reduce the frictional force and/or maintain a desired relative velocity between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium.
Still another method of removing material from a microfeature workpiece in accordance with the invention comprises rubbing the workpiece against a surface of a fixed-abrasive medium having a matrix and abrasive particles attached to the matrix, and sensing a parameter indicative of frictional force at the interface between the workpiece and the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium. This embodiment of the method continues by controlling a frictional force between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium to prevent the frictional force from exceeding a static frictional force at which the workpiece skips on the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium.
Additional aspects of the invention are directed toward systems for removing material from microfeature workpieces. One embodiment of such a system comprises a support, a fixed-abrasive medium on the support, and a head configured to rub a microfeature against the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium. The system further includes an actuator operatively coupled to at least one of the support, the fixed-abrasive medium, and/or the head. The system further includes a controller coupled to the actuator. The controller comprises a computer-operable medium containing instructions that cause the actuator to vibrate at an interface between the workpiece and the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium to maintain a frictional force between the workpiece and the surface within a desired range.
Another system for removing material from a microfeature workpiece comprises a support, a fixed-abrasive medium on the support, a head configured to rub a microfeature workpiece against the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium, and an actuator operatively coupled to at least one of the support, the fixed-abrasive medium, and/or the head. This system further includes a controller coupled to the actuator. The controller in this embodiment comprises a computer-operable medium containing instructions that cause the actuator to oscillate at least one of the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium relative to each other to control a frictional force at an interface between the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium.
Still another system for removing material from a microfeature workpiece in accordance with the invention comprises a support, a fixed-abrasive medium on the support, a head configured to rub a microfeature workpiece against the fixed-abrasive medium, an actuator operatively coupled to at least one of the support, the fixed-abrasive medium, and/or the head, and a sensor configured to sense a parameter relative to a frictional force between the workpiece and the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium. This system further includes a controller that comprises a computer-operable medium containing instructions which cause the actuator to move at least one of the workpiece and the fixed-abrasive medium relative to each other in a direction transverse to the interface based on the parameter detected by the sensor.
B. Systems and Methods for Removing Materials From Workpieces
The fixed-abrasive medium 140 has a matrix and a plurality of abrasive-particles retained in the matrix. The matrix typically includes a binder that holds the abrasive particles in place such that abrasive particles at a bearing surface 142 of the fixed-abrasive medium 140 are fixed in a desired distribution. Suitable fixed-abrasive mediums are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,007,407; 5,692,950; and 5,958,794, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The fixed-abrasive medium 140 can be used dry, with de-ionizing water, and/or a planarizing solution 144 that includes chemicals for chemically controlling aspects of removing material from the workpiece. The planarizing solution 144, for example, can include chemicals that etch and/or oxidize the surface of the workpiece. In certain embodiments, the planarizing solution 144 can also include abrasive particles in addition to the abrasive particles fixed to the matrix in the fixed-abrasive medium 140.
The machine 110 further includes an actuator 150 for imparting relative motion between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140. One embodiment of the actuator 150 vibrates an interface between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 to maintain a frictional force between the workpiece 12 and the bearing surface 142 within a desired range while the workpiece 12 rubs against the fixed-abrasive medium 140. Another embodiment of the actuator 150 oscillates at least one of the workpiece 12, the fixed-abrasive medium 140, the head 130, and/or the support 120 to control the frictional force at the interface between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140. In still other embodiments, the actuator 150 moves at least one of the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 relative to each other in a direction transverse to the interface between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140. Several embodiments of methods in accordance with the invention accordingly use the actuator 150 to control the frictional force between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140. For example, the actuator 150 can move at least the workpiece 12 and/or the fixed-abrasive medium 140 based on a parameter indicative of the frictional force to prevent the frictional force from exceeding a static frictional force level at which the workpiece 12 skips, chatters, sticks, or otherwise moves in an uncontrolled manner across the surface of the fixed-abrasive medium 140.
The actuator 150 in the embodiment shown in
The machine 110 operates by rubbing the workpiece 12 against the bearing surface 142 of the fixed-abrasive medium 140 and activating the actuator 150 to move the workpiece 12 relative to the fixed-abrasive medium 140. The actuator 150 is controlled by a controller 160 having a computer-operable medium with instructions that cause the actuator 150 to impart the relative motion between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140. The controller 160, for example, can include computer-operable instructions that cause the actuator 150 to oscillate at a frequency that maintains the frictional force between the workpiece 12 and the bearing surface 142 of the fixed-abrasive medium 140 within a desired range. More specifically, the controller 160 can operate the actuator 150 to control the frictional force from exceeding a level at which deceleration between the workpiece 12 and the bearing surface 142 exceeds a deceleration limit. In another embodiment, the controller 160 can operate the actuator 150 to control the frictional force from exceeding a level at which the relative velocity between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 falls below a threshold limit.
One advantage of several embodiments of the machine 110 is that the relative motion between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 is expected to reduce the probability that the wafer will skip, chatter, stick, or otherwise move in an undesired manner across the surface 142 of the fixed-abrasive medium 140. It is believed that vibrating the workpiece 12 and/or the fixed-abrasive medium 140 varies the down-force in a manner that prevents the relative velocity between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 from dropping below a threshold at which the workpiece skips or sticks to the fixed-abrasive medium 140 (e.g., the static friction threshold). As a result, it is expected that several embodiments of the invention will reduce scratches or other defects commonly associated with removing materials from workpieces using fixed-abrasive mediums.
Referring still to
The machine 510 is used in several methods for removing material from a workpiece 12. One embodiment of such a method comprises detecting at least one of the relative velocity between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140, the acceleration of the head 130, and/or vibrations of the head 130. This embodiment can further include controlling the actuator 150 to maintain the movement between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 within a desired range. For example, the controller 160 can vibrate the interface between the workpiece 12 and the surface 142 of the fixed-abrasive medium 140 when the sensor indicates (a) that deceleration of the head 130 exceeds a deceleration limit, (b) that the relative velocity between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 is below a desired limit, and/or (c) the out-of-plane vibrations of the head 130 exceed a limit. The machine 510 is accordingly expected to provide better control of the motion between the workpiece 12 and the fixed-abrasive medium 140 based on the parameter detected by the sensors. It will be appreciated that only one sensor is needed for the machine 510, but any number of similar or different sensors can be used in combination as well.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5081796 | Schultz | Jan 1992 | A |
5232875 | Tuttle et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5234867 | Schultz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240552 | Yu et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5244534 | Yu et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5245790 | Jerbic | Sep 1993 | A |
5245796 | Miller et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
RE34425 | Schultz | Nov 1993 | E |
5421769 | Schultz et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5433651 | Lustig et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5449314 | Meikle et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5486129 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5514245 | Doan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533924 | Stroupe et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540810 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5609718 | Meikle | Mar 1997 | A |
5618381 | Doan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5618447 | Sandhu | Apr 1997 | A |
5643060 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658183 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658190 | Wright et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664988 | Stroupe et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5679065 | Henderson | Oct 1997 | A |
5692950 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700180 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702292 | Brunelli et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5730642 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5747386 | Moore | May 1998 | A |
5792709 | Robinson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795495 | Meikle | Aug 1998 | A |
5807165 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830806 | Hudson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842909 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851135 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5868896 | Robinson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5882248 | Wright et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893754 | Robinson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895550 | Andreas | Apr 1999 | A |
5934980 | Koos et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945347 | Wright | Aug 1999 | A |
5954912 | Moore | Sep 1999 | A |
5958794 | Bruxvoort et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967030 | Blalock | Oct 1999 | A |
5972792 | Hudson | Oct 1999 | A |
5980363 | Meikle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981396 | Robinson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994224 | Sandhu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997384 | Blalock | Dec 1999 | A |
6007407 | Rutherford et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6039633 | Chopra | Mar 2000 | A |
6040245 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6054015 | Brunelli et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6066030 | Uzoh | May 2000 | A |
6074286 | Ball | Jun 2000 | A |
6083085 | Lankford | Jul 2000 | A |
6110820 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116988 | Ball | Sep 2000 | A |
6120354 | Koos et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125255 | Litman | Sep 2000 | A |
6135856 | Tjaden et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139402 | Moore | Oct 2000 | A |
6143123 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143155 | Adams et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152808 | Moore | Nov 2000 | A |
6176992 | Talieh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187681 | Moore | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191037 | Robinson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193588 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200901 | Hudson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203404 | Joslyn et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203407 | Robinson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203413 | Skrovan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206756 | Chopra et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210257 | Carlson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213845 | Elledge | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218316 | Marsh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224466 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227955 | Custer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234874 | Ball | May 2001 | B1 |
6234877 | Koos et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234878 | Moore | May 2001 | B1 |
6237483 | Blalock | May 2001 | B1 |
6250994 | Chopra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251785 | Wright | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261151 | Sandhu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261163 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267650 | Hembree | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273786 | Chopra et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273796 | Moore | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276996 | Chopra | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306012 | Sabde | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306014 | Walker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306768 | Klein | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312558 | Moore | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6313038 | Chopra et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328632 | Chopra | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331488 | Doan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338667 | Sandhu et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6350180 | Southwick | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6350691 | Lankford | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352466 | Moore | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354923 | Lankford | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354930 | Moore | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358122 | Sabde et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358127 | Carlson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358129 | Dow | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6361417 | Walker et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6364757 | Moore | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6368190 | Easter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368193 | Carlson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368194 | Sharples et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368197 | Elledge | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6376381 | Sabde | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383934 | Sabde et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387289 | Wright | May 2002 | B1 |
6395620 | Pan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402884 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428386 | Bartlett | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447369 | Moore | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6498101 | Wang | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511576 | Klein | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6520834 | Marshall | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533893 | Sabde et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6547640 | Hofmann | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6548407 | Chopra et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579799 | Chopra et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592443 | Kramer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609947 | Moore | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623329 | Moore | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633084 | Sandhu et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6652764 | Blalock | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666749 | Taylor | Dec 2003 | B2 |
20020004365 | Jeong et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020132561 | Schulz et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020187735 | Nabeya | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20050112998 | Matsuo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070049172 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |