The invention pertains to earth working equipment, more particularly to a machine comprising a soil disrupter for slicing a thin trench in soil, an apparatus for simultaneously inserting silt fencing and wire mesh backing to support the silt fencing and to anchor the silt fencing into the soil in a proper position, and an apparatus for backfilling soil into such trench to secure the silt fencing with wire backing and anchor in the proper position.
In the construction field, silt fence is a synthetic material, about the weight of canvas and typically 60 inches wide, installed around construction sites, disturbed areas, and in ditches to retain silt while allowing water to slowly pass through. Approximately 45 inches to 54 inches remain above the ground supported by posts, and the balance is buried in the ground to prevent soil and debris from escaping under the silt fencing. Most installation procedures follow engineering specifications calling for a trench 12 inches deep and 6 inches wide with a lap of silt fence covering the bottom of the trench to be covered and compacted with soil.
Erosion control, including silt fence, is mandated on all federal projects and on many urban projects, both public and private. Millions of feet are installed each year. Traditionally, the silt fence has been installed with support for its vertical position provided only through rigid support stakes set into the ground at varying intervals. This traditional method of installation without the presence of continuous vertical support between stakes often results in the failure of the silt fence to maintain its integrity. A breach in the integrity of the silt fence allows silt to flow over, under, or through the fence resulting in a failure of the silt barrier. Increasingly, administrative agencies and private entities responsible for construction projects, whose nature demands silt fencing, are requiring that the flexible silt fences be supported by rigid backing as support between stakes as a way to maintain the silt fence more securely in a vertical position and thus to prevent breaches of the silt barrier.
Furthermore, the traditional method of installation of silt fencing relies almost exclusively upon the compaction of soil around the subsurface portion of the silt fencing to anchor the silt fence in place. Due to poor compaction methods employed, silt fences installed in this traditional manner can become easily unanchored, especially during large rainwater events. Thus, this traditional method of anchoring often results in breaches of the integrity of the base of silt fence. Increasingly, administrative agencies and private entities responsible for construction projects whose nature demands silt fencing are requiring that improved methods for anchoring the silt fencing be employed to more securely affix the silt fence and better protect it against erosion and resulting gaps at the bottom.
Contractors from all over the country, hands-on people and large companies knowledgeable in the art and part of the industry, have attempted to build a machine that installs silt fencing efficiently and effectively. None have designed a means to simultaneously install a rigid wire mesh backing that will provide the horizontal and vertical benefits desired. Currently, most contractors use a trenching machine to dig and excavate a 150 mm deep trench, after which they pound in steel posts, insert wire mesh into the trench and then attach fabric to the wire in the open trench. The wire/fabric combination is then uprighted and held in place by posts with a short lip of the fabric/mesh combination on the bottom of the trench for soil to rest on. The trench is then manually backfilled by pushing the excavated soil into the open trench with a blade on their machine.
There exists one design of a machine invention disclosed in the Carpenter patent (U.S. Pat. No. 5,915,878), whereby silt fencing in installed with a rope anchor in a trench sliced by the same invention, but it does not teach the simultaneous incorporation of the wire mesh support member in its installation claims and has a number of important design differences. Carpenter does not teach or contemplate the simultaneous installation of a relatively rigid backing member, including the wire mesh of the present application, and thus it fails to address the problem of support for silt fencing that is now being demanded and/or required. Furthermore, Carpenter specifically requires that large holes be drilled in its wheel, used to insert silt fencing into a trench, as a means to avoid bunching or gathering of the silt fence material during installation, whereas the introduction of the wire mesh backing in the present application configures the silt fence fabric to avoid drilling holes that could compromise the structural integrity of the wheel. The presence of holes in the wheel of the present application could cause the wire mesh to become entangled with the wheel and pull the wire mesh out of the ground. Carpenter also requires the use of static panels as a means to guide the silt fencing fabric to its proper position for insertion by the wheel in that invention. Carpenter also employs static panels to hold the soil that has been sliced back while its wheel rolls the fabric in the ground, then allowing the soil to collapse back against the fabric after it passes by the panels. These panels will not work with the wire mesh in the present application because the panels would cause the wire to bunch up and become entangled with the panels instead of flowing through them. Again, the introduction of the wire mesh backing in the present application configures the silt fence fabric to avoid the need for panels or other guides for the fencing during installation. Furthermore, the incorporation of crimped wire mesh into the subterranean fold of the silt fencing in the present application provides far stronger anchoring qualities than the rope anchor taught by Carpenter. Finally, the foot member in the present application automates the compaction of soil displaced through installation of the silt fencing, an element and process that is not taught in Carpenter. Many other examples of the prior art are referenced in the Carpenter patent.
Thus, the present application improves on the prior art by automating and mechanizing the simultaneous installation of a rigid support member for silt fencing, by providing superior anchoring for the silt fencing once installed and by automating and mechanizing the compaction of disturbed soil after installation of the silt fencing. These enhancements over the prior art reduce labor costs and improve the structural integrity of silt fencing, presenting a cost benefit to consumers and the public, as well as a reduction in silt pollution to the environment.
The invention mechanizes a part of the above operation with a device attached to the back of a tractor or other motive force which simultaneously does several things. First a plow head or other soil disturber (“plow head”) trenches a line, and two spools synchronized with the speed of the motive force respectively lay down wire mesh and silt fencing fabric above the trench. In-line with the plow head and behind it is a strong generally circular rigid plate (steel is a good choice) which rolls over the wire/fabric, pushes the wire and fabric into the disrupted soil or trench and crimps the wire and fabric so that it is seated in the “V” of the disrupted soil or trench. Just behind and offset slightly on one side of the circular plate is a backfill “foot” which pushes the just-plowed dirt back into the trench substantially covering the crimped wire and fabric. After this mechanized operation is completed, the main body of the wire and fabric is brought upright and held in that position by posts set at appropriate intervals along the line where the trenching has been done. The wire is clipped to the posts and the fabric to the wire.
Because the silt fencing material is of a lighter weight and more flexible than the wire mesh, once the machine of the invention begins to move and pull upon the silt fence material, there may be a tendency for the roll of material to rotate on its spool more rapidly than it is being embedded into the ground by virtue of inertial rotation. To retard such possible inertial “over-rolling,” an encumbrance of some kind may be desirable. Such an encumbrance could be an automatic or manual brake applied to the roll of silt fence material, or more simply, just a weight draped across the roll of silt fence material, such as a relatively heavy chain anchored to the frame at one end and with the loose end extending across the roll of silt fence material in the direction of rotation of the roll.
In order to be sure the correct depth has been achieved, one or more depth markers (such as a circle or concentric circles) have been placed onto the center of the circular plate generally up to 6 inches from its perimeter so that it is easy to see visually whether the desired depth of the trench has been consistently achieved, with the ability to vary the depth to greater than 6 inches (usually the minimum required depth) depending on the situation.
Because silt fencing can be attached to the wire mesh after the latter has been affixed to its support stakes, the simultaneous layering of the wire mesh or other support member and the silt fence during installation of the silt fence fabric would improve the speed of the complete installation of the fully supported fence and contributes to superior anchoring of the silt fence material into the ground. An improvement in the speed of installation would reduce costs to the public who are both taxpayers and consumers. Furthermore, the improvement in quality of the integrity of the traditional silt fence would reduce erosion and the resulting damage to our environment.
The integration of the wire mesh and fabric as an anchor in the crimped fold between the silt fence and the wire mesh backing will also improve the integrity of the installed fence and would eliminate reinstallation of silt fencing following a breach in the silt fencing material. The elimination of the labor costs associated with reinstallation of the silt fence would further reduce costs. Furthermore, the improvement in the integrity of the traditional silt fence would reduce erosion and the resulting damage to the environment.
These and other features, aspects, structures, advantages, and functions are shown or are inherent in, and will become better understood with regard to, the following description and accompanied drawings where:
Referring now more particularly to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several figures,
The silt fence machine 10 includes a frame 30,
The hydraulic pistons 36 are affixed in a rigid manner atop frames 30A and 30B. The piston arms 36A of hydraulic pistons 36 are affixed to vertical plate 32B by swiveling spindles 38. The hydraulic pistons 36 are not affixed to power source 12 or any other power source. Rather, hydraulic fluid lines 36B allow the transfer of hydraulic fluid between the hydraulic pistons 36 during operation of the silt fence machine 10 in order to allow the silt fence machine 10 to articulate around swiveling spindles 34 and 38. When the silt fence machine 10 is not in operation, hydraulic line valve 36C is closed thereby preventing the transfer of hydraulic fluid through hydraulic fluid lines 36B and preventing silt fence machine 10 from articulating around swiveling spindles 34 and 38.
Rigid forms, which in a preferred embodiment are tubular steel, comprise support structure 40 that also functions as one side of the partial C-channel frame 30B,
Welded to support member 44 is an elongated member, such as a length of standard pipe or solid cold roll finish bar (pipe) 44B, that extends perpendicular to vertical support member 44 and horizontal to the ground 100. Pipe 44B holds a roll of wire mesh fencing 48, preferably 14 gauge or larger, which is bracketed by circular metal plate 44A. Circular plate 44A has a hole drilled through its center axis so as to fit over pipe 44. Circular plate 44A is mounted onto pipe 44 by fitting pipe 44 through the center axis hole in circular plate 44A, and circular plate 44A can be adjusted to its desired position along pipe 44B and then locked into place. The roll of wire mesh fencing 48 is positioned bottom first on pipe 44B, and circular plate 44A positions the bottom edge of the wire mesh fencing 48 approximately 4 inches to 8 inches perpendicularly from the plane of wheel 50.
Circular metal plates 42C and 44C have holes drilled through their center axis so as to fit over pipes 42B and 44B, respectively, to hold the rolls of silt fence material 46 and wire mesh fencing 48 in their desired horizontal positions on pipes 42B and 44B. Pipe collars 42D and 44D are then fitted onto pipes 42B and 44B, respectively, to lock circular pates 42C and 44C so as to hold silt fence material 46 and wire mesh backing 48 into their respective horizontal positions.
Silt fence material 46 and wire mesh backing 48 are converted to a vertical position by wheel 50 engaging the horizontal silt fence material 46 and wire mesh fencing 48 perpendicularly as they roll downward and away from the towing vehicle or motive force 12, thus causing the silt fence material 46 and wire mesh backing 48 to fold into two flaps as they flow beneath and pivot against wheel 50 (
Wheel 50,
Support arm 52 is fastened inside of housing 54. Housing 54 is constructed of a strong rigid material (such as steel), and further houses ratchet mechanism 56 for the adjustment of the vertical depth of wheel 50. The adjustment of the depth of wheel 50 is controlled by manual manipulation of ratchet arm 56A. Housing 54 is welded to the right (inside) side of support structure 40.
Foot 60,
Pertaining to the operation of silt fence machine 10,
As silt fence machine 10 levels off, vertical wheel 50 engages silt fence material 46 and wire mesh backing 48 and begins to rotate, and silt fence material 46 and wire mesh backing 48 are funneled to wheel 50 and inserted by wheel 50 into trench 110 in soil 100. Wheel 50 crimps the wire mesh backing 48 on top of silt fence material 46 into trench 110 in soil 100 being formed by soil disrupter 20, creating flaps of silt fence material 46 and wire mesh backing 48 of unequal proportion (
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is, therefore, to be understood that, within the scope of the pending claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described. To the extent other embodiments are herein created, it is intended that they fall within the scope and protection provided by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4705427 | Atkins et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5039250 | Janz | Aug 1991 | A |
5915878 | Carpenter | Jun 1999 | A |
6158923 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6551031 | Van Ornum | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6796747 | Vreeland | Sep 2004 | B1 |
20020192029 | Vreeland | Dec 2002 | A1 |