This invention relates generally to sensors that are fabricated using semiconductor processing techniques. More particularly, this invention relates to a batch fabricated cantilever palette with individual cantilever array blocks to identify micro-forces.
Sensors for measuring strong forces are well known in the art. For example, sensors to identify strong mechanical, acoustic, magnetic, electrostatic, and thermal forces are well known. There is a growing demand for fast, sensitive, inexpensive, and reliable sensors to identify micro-forces. As used herein, the term micro-force refers to a force that is capable of deflecting, but not destroying, a micron scale cantilever. The micro-forces may be in the form of chemical, mechanical, thermal (through conduction, convection or radiation), acoustic, magnetic, or electrostatic forces or combinations of these forces. By way of illustration, the invention is described in connection with the sensing of micro-forces arising from biological interactions, which create micro-forces in the form of chemical-mechanical forces.
In the context of measuring micro-forces associated with biological interactions, one could focus, for example, on the need to detect disease and biological pathogens. As discussed below, conventional methods for biological sensing suffer from at least one of several problems, including long analysis time, high instrumentation cost, lack of sensitivity, and the inability for real-time monitoring.
Immunosensors utilize the specificity of antibody-antigen (Ab-Ag) interactions in combination with a variety of transduction techniques. Electrochemical devices monitor the current at a fixed potential (amperometry) or voltage at zero current (potentiometry), or conductivity or impedance changes due to biochemical reaction. Optical methods use the effect of biological events on light absorption, fluorescence, refractive index variation, or other optical parameters. Techniques such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) have shown promise in providing direct measurement of Ag-Ab interactions occurring at the surface-solution interface. The major draw back of optical systems is the use of complex optical components and their high cost. Thermometric devices operate by measuring enthalpy changes during the biological reaction. Piezoelectric devices utilize surface acoustic waves to detect changes in resonance in the presence of Ag-Ab reactions. The principal attraction of piezoelectric immunosensors is their ability to directly monitor the binding of Ab-Ag reactions encountered in affinity sensing. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a sensitive technique for diagnosis. Enzyme immunoassays combine the specific recognition of antibodies for their target molecules with the catalytic power of enzymes into a single sensitive and relatively simple test. Antibodies, bacterial and viral antigens, nucleic acids, and many diverse molecules are detected by an indicator system in which the bound enzyme convert a colorless chromogenic substrate into brightly colored products. ELISA, however, involves multiple steps making it labor intensive.
Micron scale cantilever beams are currently used as ultra-sensitive force sensors in many different applications. Cantilevers can be fabricated in arrays using almost any material that is compatible with microfabrication. For example, semiconductor-based cantilevers are used in atomic force microscopes (AFMs). The length, width, thickness, and modulus of a cantilever beam can be controlled to produce spring constants, g, between 0.01–10 N/m and with resonant frequency in the range of 10–500 kHz. Cantilever deflections, d, can be optically detected with resolutions of about 1 Å or 100 pm, which leads to a force resolution, F=gd, in the range of 1–100 pN.
In addition to their wide use in AFMs where the force is applied at a single point (the tip), microcantilevers have recently been used as sensors for measuring extremely small bending moments that are produced by thermally or chemically generated stresses over the whole cantilever surface. It has been demonstrated that a cantilever beam can be used as a calorimeter to detect the heat of a catalytic reaction. Cantilevers have also been used as infrared sensors where the thermal stress is produced by infrared absorption. Each of these systems relies upon complex and expensive optical processing equipment.
Microcantilevers have also been used for detecting enzyme-mediated catalytic biological reactions with femtoJoule resolution, as shown in T. Thundat, et al., “Microcantilever Sensors”, Microscale Thermophysical Engr. 1, 185–199 (197). Thundat and co-workers disclose an antibody-Antigen (Ab-Ag) reaction using a cantilever sensor, presumably due to surface stresses generated by intermolecular force interactions of the Ag-Ab complex. Thundat analyzes frequency changes in a single resonating cantilever beam. Thus, the Thundat system requires active circuitry to operate the cantilever beam and to measure cantilever beam frequency responses to biological reactions.
In view of the foregoing, it would be highly desirable to provide an improved technique for sensing micro-forces. In particular, it would be highly desirable to provide a technique with reduced analysis time, low instrumentation cost, high sensitivity, and real-time monitoring.
The apparatus of the invention is a cantilever palette with a set of cantilever array blocks. Each cantilever array block includes a set of cantilevers, with each cantilever including a set of cantilever fingers surrounded by a frame with frame fingers. The cantilever fingers and the frame fingers form a diffraction grating. Each cantilever array block is configured to be responsive to a predetermined micro-force, such that cantilevers of the cantilever array block deflect in the presence of the predetermined micro-force, which causes the diffraction grating to diffract light and thereby provide a visual indication of the presence of the predetermined micro-force.
The method of the invention includes the step of forming a cantilever palette including a set of cantilever array blocks, each cantilever array block including a set of cantilevers. Each cantilever includes a set of cantilever fingers surrounded by a frame with frame fingers. The cantilever fingers and the frame fingers form a diffraction grating. Each cantilever array block is configured to be responsive to a predetermined micro-force. The cantilever palette is exposed to the predetermined micro-force, thereby causing cantilevers of the cantilever array block to deflect such that the diffraction grating produces diffracted light. The diffracted light from the diffraction grating is visually observed to identify the presence of the predetermined micro-force.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the technique of the invention provides sensing with reduced analysis time, low instrumentation costs, high sensitivity, and real-time monitoring. Advantageously, the real-time monitoring may be accomplished through visual observation by a human eye. The visual observation may also be augmented with various optical devices.
In the context of biological sensing, the invention exploits the high specificity of monoclonal Ab-Ag reactions and the sensitivity of microcantilevers for ultra-low force detection. Thus, the invention may be exploited in polynucleotide hybridization and protein-nucleic acid interactions (such as, e.g., DNA/RNA, DNA/DNA, protein-DNA, and protein-RNA). Further examples of the use of the invention in the context of biological sensing include pathogen detection, medical diagonostics, implantable biosensors, food processing/monitoring, environmental monitoring, pharmaceutical screening, and the like. The sensors of the invention are particularly suited for processes that are liquid based, since electrical contact with the liquid is not necessary. Advantageously, the invention provides for visual readout, which is advantageous for field applications. In addition, the invention utilizes the low cost of microfabricating cantilever arrays by standard CMOS or surface micromachining techniques.
For a better understanding of the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a)–7(l) illustrate processing steps utilized to construct an apparatus in accordance with the invention.
Like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
By way of example, the cantilever palette 20 contains N cantilever array blocks 22, with each cantilever array block 22 being approximately 5 mm×5 mm in size, thus individual array blocks 22 are visible to the naked eye and are sufficiently large for loading a substance that is to be sensed. In one implementation, each cantilever array block contains an array of approximately 50×50 cantilevers 28, with each cantilever 28 being about 100 μm×100 μm in size. Each cantilever 28 may be implemented with a series of 1–2 μm wide cantilever fingers 30.
Returning to
Each cantilever array block 22 may be configured to be responsive to a different predetermined substance. In this case, N different substances may be sensed with a single cantilever palette 20.
Alternately, each cantilever array block 22 may be configured to be responsive to a predetermined level of a single substance. In such an embodiment, the number of blocks 22 producing visible light specifies the level of the sensed substance.
In another embodiment of the invention, the palette 20 is divided into cantilever array block subsets. For example, a column of cantilever array blocks 22 may be assigned to measure varying levels of a single substance. In this case, the number of cantilever array blocks 22 within a column that produces visible light will indicate the level of the sensed substance.
The foregoing aspects of the invention are more fully appreciated with reference to a specific example. Consider the case where each of the N cantilever array blocks 22 is loaded with a single type of monoclonal antibody (Ab), such that N different types of antibodies are tested on a single palette 20. The antibodies are attached to one side of the cantilevers 28 in order to produce differential surface stress. When the cantilever palette 20 is exposed to a solution of antigens (Ag), the high specificity of the Ab-Ag reaction chemically and mechanically induces deflection of only the particular array of cantilevers that contains the corresponding antibody. The cantilevers deflect with respect to the surrounding stationary frame fingers 41. The cantilever fingers 30 are designed such that the incidence of white light on the array of cantilever-based diffraction grating produces a predetermined color that is visible to the human eye.
Once the cantilever palette 20 is fabricated and loaded with antibodies, the cantilever palette 20 is exposed to antigens and visually observed for color change in the array. The cantilever palette 20 thereby operates as a micro-mechanical “litmus paper” for detection of antigens.
Observe that the cantilever palette 20 does not require external power, since the actuation is chemical and mechanical (chemical-mechanical) and the detection is based on dispersion of background white light. If necessary, a light source, such as a light emitting diode or a laser in conjunction with photodiodes can be used to detect the cantilever deflection. Another advantage of the invention is that a single 3 cm×3 cm chip can detect about (N=) 25–30 antigens making the process highly parallel. The low fabrication and operation costs for the cantilever palette 20 make it disposable. The high specificity of Ag-Ab reactions make the test highly selective. The cantilever palette is several orders of magnitude more sensitive than existing techniques. Advantageously, the cantilever palette is a “passive” device in the sense that the cantilevers are not oscillated, as commonly done with prior art cantilevers used in sensing applications. This visual output is achieved by the diffraction grating produced between the cantilever fingers 30 and the frame fingers 41. That is, the movement of the cantilever 28 causes the cantilever fingers 30 to move with respect to the stationary frame fingers 41, thereby producing an optically observable event. Since the output from the cantilever palette 20 is visually observable, expensive optical processing equipment is not required.
Monoclonal antibodies can be loaded into the cantilever palette 20 in several ways. As known in the art, antibodies are proteins which tend to have higher affinity to glass than metal surfaces, such as gold. Hence, if one surface is coated with gold and the other with silicon dioxide, the antibodies preferentially cover more of the glass surface than the gold. Dipping the cantilever palette 20 into a solution of antibodies is sufficient for coating the glass-side of the cantilever with antibodies.
More sophisticated monoclonal antibody loading methods may also be used. One method involves a mixed alkanethiol monolayer (self-assembled monolayer or SAM) which maintains a hydrophilic interface for the biomolecule, yet passivates the high energy gold surface from nonspecific adsorption. Covalent linkages between the biomolecule and the SAM are achieved via peptide linkages. Alternatively, if the silicon side of the cantilever (or an oxide coated metal surface) is to be derivatized, photodefinable silane monolayers may be used to couple biomolecules to the surface. It is important to avoid the standard silanes (e.g. trimethoxy derivatives) because they have a tendency to form three dimensional layers on the surface. This results in loss of coupling between the cantilever 28 and the added mass presented by the antibody or antibody/colloidal gold conjugate.
The cantilever 28 may be implemented with silicon nitride, polysilicon, and single crystal silicon. Design parameters include size of the membrane, length and width of the cantilever, length and width of the cantilever fingers, the frame fingers, the number of fingers, and the like.
a)–7(l) illustrate processing steps that may be used to construct a cantilever palette 20 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
Next, the PSG layer on the top side is removed and the PSG layer on the back side is thinned to 0.5 microns using plasma etching and a PSG wet etch. This results in the device of
A 0.5 micron PSG layer is then grown on both sides of the wafer 60. This results in the device of
A silicon nitride cantilever is then patterned and etched using a plasma etch. This results in the structure of
The next processing step relates to patterning deep alignment holes. Deep alignment holes 74 are illustrated in
The silicon nitride layer 70 on the backside of the wafer 60 is then plasma etched, resulting in the device of
The final processing step is to deep etch the silicon substrate 60. This results in the final device, as shown in
The invention has now been fully disclosed. Those skilled in the art will recognize many variations of the invention that are within the general teachings of the invention. Further, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be exploited in connection with other physical devices. For example, the invention need not be used solely in connection with direct visual read out by a human eye. The images created in accordance with the invention may be applied to an imaging device, such as a charge coupled device and then be analyzed with image processing software. In addition, the invention may be used in connection with various image enhancement devices, such as beam splitters, lenses, and filters.
As indicated above, incident light is diffracted by the diffraction grating. In particular, incident light is diffracted by the diffraction grating at a series of specific angles corresponding to the particular order of the diffraction. The first focusing lens 94 performs a spatial Fourier transform and generates the diffraction pattern on its focal plane. Because of the structure of the whole focal plane array, the diffraction pattern contains two different spatial frequencies: one corresponding to the periodicity of the inter-digital fingers (formed by the cantilever fingers and frame fingers), and the other corresponding to pixel-to-pixel periodicity within the cantilever array. The energy distribution between the diffraction orders depends on the relative distance between the movable and fixed inter-digital fingers. As shown in
After the first order primary peak containing the sub-order peaks pass through the spatial filter 96, a second lens 98 is used to perform an inverse Fourier transform and restores the wave-front from the spectral information. The aperture size of the spatial filter 96 is large enough to allow most of the sub-orders of the first main order to pass through. Thus, the wavefront still contains the cantilever array information.
Variations on the structure of
The pin hole array may be fabricated by depositing a coating of low reflectivity and transmissivity on a glass substrate and then patterning to leave 30 μm square apertures. By placing the pin hole array 350 μm away from the cantilever palette 20, it was theoretically predicted and experimentally established, that the zeroth order intensity changed from bright to dark for a relative displacement of the grating by λ/4 (λ=632 nm was the He—Ne laser wavelength used here). Since the human eye can typically detect about 200 shades of gray scale, this results in a resolution of about 1 nm for measuring cantilever deflections.
The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that the specific details are not required in order to practice the invention. In other instances, well known circuits and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessary distraction from the underlying invention. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, obviously many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/377,146, filed Aug. 19, 1999 now abandoned.
This invention was made with Governmental support under Grant (Contract) No. CTS-9423141 awarded by the National Science Foundation and DARPA N66001-97-C-8621. The Government has certain rights to this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4236893 | Rice | Dec 1980 | A |
4242096 | Oliveira et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4487839 | Kamentsky | Dec 1984 | A |
4537861 | Elings et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4596697 | Ballato | Jun 1986 | A |
4637987 | Minten et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4651074 | Wuse | Mar 1987 | A |
4735906 | Bastiaans et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4847193 | Richards et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4867946 | Gross et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4906840 | Zdeblick et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4909990 | Block et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4931384 | Layton et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4999284 | Ward et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5001053 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
RE33581 | Nicoli et al. | Apr 1991 | E |
5025658 | Elings et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5055265 | Finlan | Oct 1991 | A |
5118608 | Layton et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130257 | Baer et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5135852 | Ebersole et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5144833 | Amer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156810 | Ribi | Oct 1992 | A |
5156972 | Issachar | Oct 1992 | A |
5172472 | Lindner et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179028 | Vali et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5283037 | Baer et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5306644 | Myerholtz et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5323636 | McGowan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5350697 | Swope et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352582 | Lichtenwalter et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372930 | Colton et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374563 | Maule | Dec 1994 | A |
5411709 | Furuki et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427915 | Ribi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5439829 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445008 | Wachter et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445970 | Rohr | Aug 1995 | A |
5445971 | Rohr | Aug 1995 | A |
5468606 | Bogart et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477716 | Snow | Dec 1995 | A |
5482678 | Sittler | Jan 1996 | A |
5494639 | Grzegorzewski | Feb 1996 | A |
5494829 | Sandstrom et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501986 | Ward et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5510481 | Bednarski et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525466 | Slovacek et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5563341 | Fenner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5595908 | Fawcett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5631171 | Sandstrom et al. | May 1997 | A |
5639671 | Bogart et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
RE35544 | Snow | Jul 1997 | E |
5650123 | Saini et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658732 | Ebersole et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5705399 | Larue | Jan 1998 | A |
5719324 | Thundat et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728584 | Sausa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5750410 | Dou et al. | May 1998 | A |
5753518 | Karlsson | May 1998 | A |
5763191 | Knoll et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763768 | Henderson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770389 | Ching et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770459 | Massey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786621 | Saif et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807758 | Lee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819749 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827748 | Golden | Oct 1998 | A |
5830134 | Caputo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846708 | Hollis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856203 | Robinson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862003 | Saif et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5888825 | Carr et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5908981 | Atalar et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918263 | Thundat | Jun 1999 | A |
5919576 | Hui et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923421 | Rajic et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923637 | Shimada et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5955377 | Maul et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955659 | Gupta et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959808 | Fan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5989923 | Lowe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995334 | Fan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998906 | Jerman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6000280 | Miller et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005400 | Thundat et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008057 | Glass et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016686 | Thundat | Jan 2000 | A |
6022748 | Charych et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029500 | Tom | Feb 2000 | A |
6050722 | Thundat et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060256 | Everhart et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073484 | Miller et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086821 | Lee et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096559 | Thundat et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6096599 | Kepler et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6103492 | Yu | Aug 2000 | A |
6118124 | Thundat et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6167748 | Britton, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203983 | Quate et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212939 | Thundat | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229609 | Muramatsu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249001 | Sauer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263736 | Thundat et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289717 | Thundat et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6436647 | Quate et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
20020092340 | Prater et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030092016 | Wiggins et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040007051 | Bashir et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 9502180 | Jan 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020102743 A1 | Aug 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09377146 | Aug 1999 | US |
Child | 10076838 | US |