This invention relates to an apparatus for and method of separating particulate material from denser and/or larger material containing contaminants or other undesirable constituents, while concentrating the denser and/or larger material for removal and further processing or disposal. More specifically, the invention utilizes a scrubber assembly in operative communication with a fluidized bed that is used to process coal or another organic material in such a manner that the denser and/or larger material containing contaminates or other undesirable constituent is separated from the rest of the coal or other organic material.
About 63% of the world's electric power and 70% of the electric power produced in the United States is generated from the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil, or natural gas at electric power plants. Such fuel is burned in a combustion chamber at the power plant to produce heat used to convert water in a boiler to steam. This steam is then superheated and introduced to huge steam turbines whereupon it pushes against the fanlike blades of the turbine to rotate a shaft. This spinning shaft, in turn, turns the rotor of an electric generator to produce electricity.
Eighty-nine percent of the coal mined in the United States is used as the heat source for electric power plants. Unlike petroleum and natural gas, the available supplies of coal that can be economically extracted from the earth are plentiful. Bituminous coals have been the most widely used rank of coal for electric power production because of their abundance and relatively high heating values. However, they also contain medium to high levels of sulfur. As a result of increasingly stringent environmental regulations like the Clean Air Act in the U.S., electric power plants have had to install costly scrubber devices in the smokestacks of these plants to prevent the sulfur dioxide (“SO2”), nitrous oxides (“NOx”), and fly ash that result from burning these coals to pollute the air.
Lower rank coals like subbituminous and lignite coals have gained increasing attention as heat sources for power plants because of their low sulfur content. However, they still produce sufficient levels of SO2, NOx, and fly ash when burned such that treatment of the flue gas is required to comply with federal and state pollution standards. Additionally, ash and sulfur are the chief impurities appearing in coal. The ash consists principally of mineral compounds of aluminum, calcium, iron, and silicon. Some of the sulfur in coal is also in the form of minerals—particularly pyrite, which is a compound of iron and sulfur. The remainder of the sulfur in coal is in the form of organic sulfur, which is closely combined with the carbon in the coal.
Coal mining companies typically clean their coal products to remove impurities before supplying them to end users like electric power plants and coking production plants. After sorting the pieces of coal by means of a screening device to form coarse, medium, and fine streams, these three coal streams are delivered to washing devices in which the coal particles are mixed with water. Using the principle of specific gravity, the heaviest pieces containing the largest amounts of impurities settle to the bottom of the washer, whereupon they drop into a refuse bin for subsequent disposal. The cleaned coal particles from the three streams are then combined together again and dried by means of vibrators, jigs, or hot-air blowers to produce the final coal product ready for shipment to the end user.
While the cleaning process employed by coal mining operations removes much of the ash from the coal, it has little effect on sulfur, since the organic sulfur is closely bound to the carbon within the coal. Thus, other methods can be used to further purify the coal prior to its combustion. For example, the coal particles may be fed into a large machine, wherein they are subjected to vibration and pulsated air currents. U.S. Pat. No. 3,852,168 issued to Oetiker discloses such a method and apparatus for separating corn kernels from husk parts. U.S. Pat. No. 5,244,099 issued to Zaltzman et al. on the other hand teaches the delivery of granular materials through an upwardly inclined trough through which a fluidizing gas is forced from the bottom of the trough to create a fluidized material bed. A vertical oscillatory motion is also imparted to the trough to assist in the separation of the various components contained in the material mixture. Less dense components of the mixture rise to the surface of the fluidized bed, while the denser components settle to the bottom. At the output end of the trough, a stream splitter can be used to recover different layers of materials. This apparatus is good for separating agricultural products and sand.
It is known in the prior art that under some circumstances a fluidized bed may be used without the addition of mechanical vibration or vertical oscillation to achieve particle separation. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,449,483 issued to Strohmeyer uses a heated fluidized bed dryer to treat municipal trash and remove heavier particles like glass from the trash before its combustion to produce heat. Meanwhile, U.S. Pat. No. 3,539,001 issued to Binnix et al. classifies materials from an admixture by means of intermediate selective removal of materials of predetermined sizes and specific gravities. The material mixture travels along a downwardly sloped screen support and is suspended by upwardly directed pneumatic pulses. U.S. Pat. No. 2,512,422 issued to Fletcher et al. again uses a downwardly inclined fluidized bed with upwardly directed pulses of air, wherein small particles of coal can be separated and purified from a coal mixture by providing holes in the top of the fluidized bed unit of a sufficient cross sectional area relative to the total cross sectional area of the bed to control the static pressure level within the fluidized bed to prevent the small particles of higher specific gravity from rising within the coal bed.
The process and devices disclosed in these Strohmeyer, Binnix, and Fletcher patents, however, all seem to be directed to the separation of different constituents within an admixture having a relatively large difference in specific gravity. Such processes may work readily to separate nuts, bolts, rocks, etc. from coal, however, they would not be expected to separate coal particles containing organic sulfur from coal particles largely free of sulfur since the specific gravities of these two coal fractions can be relatively close.
Another air pollutant of great concern is mercury, which occurs naturally in coal. Regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) require coal-fired power plants to dramatically reduce the mercury levels contained in their flue gases by 2010. Major efforts within the industry have focused upon the removal of mercury from the flue gas by the use of carbon-based sorbents or optimization of existing flue gas emissions control technologies to capture the mercury. However, utilization of carbon sorben-based serubber devices can be very expensive to install and operate. Moreover, currently existing emissions control equipment can work less well for high-rank coals (anthracite and bituminous) vs. low-rank coals (subbitumionous and lignite).
Western Research Institute has therefore developed and patented a pre-combustion thermal process for treating low-rank coals to remove the mercury. Using a two-zone reactor, the raw coal is heated in the first zone at approximately 300° F. to remove moisture which is purged from the zone with a sweep gas. The dried coal is then transferred to a second zone where the temperature is raised to approximately 550° F. Up to 70-80% of the mercury contained in the coal is volatilized and swept from the zone with a second sweep gas stream. The mercury is subsequently separated from the sweep gas and collected for disposal. See Guffey, F. D. & Bland, A. E., “Thermal Pretreatment of Low-Ranked Coal for Control of Mercury Emissions,” 85 Fuel Processing Technology 521-31 (2004); Merriam, N. W., “Removal of Mercury from Powder River Basin. Coal by Low-Temperature Thermal Treatment,” Topical Report WRI-93-R021 (1993); U.S. Pat. No. 5,403,365 issued to Merriam et al.
However, this pre-combustion thermal pretreatment process is still capital intensive in that it requires a dual zone reactor to effectuate the drying and mercury volatilization steps. Moreover, an energy source is required to produce the 550° F. bed temperature. Furthermore, 20-30% of the mercury cannot be removed from the coal by this process, because it is tightly bound to the carbon contained in the coal. Thus, the expensive scrubber technology will still be required to treat flue gas resulting from combustion of coal pretreated by this method because of the appreciable levels of mercury remaining in the coal after completion of this thermal pre-treatment process.
Therefore, the ability to pre-treat particulate material like coal with fluidized bed operated at very low temperature without mechanical or chemical additives in order to separate and remove most of the pollutant constituents within the coal (e.g., mercury and sulfur) would be desirable. Such a process could be applied to all ranks of coal, and would alleviate the need for expensive scrubber technology for treatment flue gases after combustion of the coal.
The present invention includes an apparatus for segregating particulate by density and/or size. The apparatus includes a fluidizing bed having a particulate receiving inlet for receiving the particulate to be fluidized. The fluidized bed also includes an opening for receiving a first fluidizing stream, which can be a primary heat stream, a secondary heat stream, at least one waste stream, or any combination thereof. At least one exit from the fluidized bed is provided for the fluidized particulate as well as at least one exit for the non-fluidized particulate. A conveyor is operatively disposed in the fluidized bed for conveying the non-fluidized particulate to the non-fluidized particulate exit. A collector box is in operative communication with the fluidized bed to receive the non-fluidized particulate. There is also a means for directing a second fluidizing stream through the non-fluidized particulate while it is in the collector box to in order to further separate fluidizable particulate there from.
One advantage of the present invention is that it permits generally continuous processing of the particulate. As the non-fluidized particulate is conveyed from the fluidized bed to the collector box more particulate can be added for processing.
Another advantage of the present invention is a generally horizontal conveyance of the non-particulate. The generally horizontal conveyance of the non-fluidized particulate ensures that all of the particulate is processed evenly and quickly by mixing or churning the material while it is being conveyed.
Still yet another advantage of the present invention is that it includes a second fluidizing step or apparatus to capture more non-contaminated fluidizable particulates that are still trapped, or have become trapped, in the non-fluidized particulate. Capturing more of the fluidized particulate increases the amount of usable non-contaminated particulates, while reducing the amount of contaminated particulates that will be subject to further processing or disposal. By capturing more of the usable non-contaminated particulates and reducing the amount of contaminated particulate a company is able to increase its efficiency while reducing its costs.
In the accompanying drawings:
The foregoing summary and are provided for example purposes only and are amenable to various modifications and arrangements that fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, the figures should not be considered limiting, but rather as a supplement to aid one skilled in the art to understand the novel concepts that are included in the following detailed description.
The invention includes an apparatus for, and a method of, separating particulate from denser and/or larger particulate containing contaminants or other undesirable constituents, while concentrating the denser and/or larger material and contaminants for removal and/or further processing. The method of separation utilized in the present invention capitalizes on the physical characteristics of the contaminants. In particular, it capitalizes on the difference between the specific gravity of contaminated and non-contaminated material. The contaminants can be removed from a majority of the material by separating and removing the denser and/or larger material. The present invention uses a fluidization method of separating the contaminated denser and/or larger material from the non-contaminated material.
Although the present invention may be used in a variety of applications such as in farming, and/or manufacturing, the following discussion will describe its use in power plants that utilize fluidized dry beds to dry coal. A concurrently filed application with having common inventors entitled Method of Enhancing the Quality of High-Moisture Materials Using System Heat Sources describes an example embodiment of drying coal in a fluidized dryer bed with waste heat. The concurrently filed application, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, will be briefly discussed to provide the reader with a general background of the potential uses for the present invention.
Once steam 47 leaves steam turbines 40 it is delivered to condenser 50 in which it is cooled by means of cooling water 52. The cooling water 52 converts the steam 47 into water. The latent heat contained within steam 47 will increase the temperature of cold cooling water 52 which is typically considered waste heat and is discharged into a pond or lake.
The operational efficiency of the electric power plant 10 of
The fluidized bed(s) 100 will operate in open air at relatively low-temperature ranges. An in-bed heat exchanger 101 will be used in conjunction with a fluidized-bed 100 design to provide additional heat for coal drying and, thus, reduce the necessary equipment size. With a sufficient in-bed heat transfer surface in a fluidized bed dryer 100, the fluidizing/drying air stream can be reduced to values corresponding to the minimum fluidization velocity. This will reduce erosion damage to and elutriation rate for the dryer.
Heat for the in-bed heat exchanger 101 can be supplied either directly or indirectly. A direct heat supply involves diverting a portion of hot fluidizing air stream, hot condenser cooling water, process steam, hot flue gas, or other waste heat sources and passing it through the in-bed heat exchanger. An indirect heat supply involves use of water or other heat transfer liquid, which is heated by hot primary air stream, hot condenser cooling water, steam extracted from steam turbine cycle, hot flue gas, or other waste heat sources in an external heat exchanger before it is passed through the in-bed heat exchanger 101.
The bed volume can be unitary (see
Referring now to
Referring particularly to
In one example embodiment of the present invention, as particularly illustrated in
An upper portion of the vessel 102 defines a freeboard region 112. Wet coal 12 enters the fluidized bed region 106 of fluidized-bed dryer 100 at entry point 114 as shown in
Still another embodiment of an open-air, low-temperature fluidized bed dryer design of the present invention is illustrated in
In the first stage 136, the hot fluidization air stream 110 is forced through the wet coal 12 supported by and above distributor plate 104 to dry the coal and separate the fluidizable material and non-fluidizable material contained within the coal. Larger and/or denser, non-fluidizable material segregate out due to having a higher specific gravity within the bed 130 and collect at its bottom on the distributor plate 104. These non-fluidizable material (“undercut”) are then discharged from the first stage 136 as Stream 1 (176). Fluidized bed dryers are generally designed to handle non-fluidized material up to four inches thick collecting at the bottom of the fluidized bed. The non-fluidized material may account for up to 25% of the coal input stream. This undercut stream 176 can be directed through another beneficiation process or simply be rejected. In this particular embodiment, movement of the non-fluidized segregated material along the distributor plate 104 to the discharge point for stream 176 is accomplished by an inclined horizontal-directional oriented distributor plate 104, as shown back in
As illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In an embodiment having only one fluidizing collector 220, as illustrated in
Referring to
In an example embodiment, as illustrated in
Gate 270 also includes at least one seal portion 274 disposed on or to an inner surface of door portion 272 to form a generally positive seal over discharge opening 232. Seal portion 274 could have an area greater than an area of discharge opening 232. Seal member 274 could comprise any resiliently compressible material such as rubber, an elastic plastic, or like devices having similar physical characteristics.
A cover 276 may be disposed on seal member 272 to protect or cover it from the fluidized and non-fluidized material that will confronting seal gate 270. As particularly illustrated in
In an example embodiment, an actuation assembly 280 is operatively coupled to gate 270 to move it from an open position and a closed position, whereby the coal is dischargable from fluidizing collector 220 when gate 270 is in the open position. Actuation assembly 280 comprises a pneumatic piston rod 284 and cylinder 286 that are in operative communication with a fluid pneumatic system (not shown). The fluid pneumatic system may include the utilization of fluid heat streams such as waste heat streams, primary heat streams, or a combination to the two.
To aid the fluidized particulate material to flow in the fluidized stream fluidizing collector 230 a fluidizing air stream such as any waste heat stream from the plant, any primary air streams or any combination thereof is introduced to the fluidizing collection 230 and coal to create a fluidized particulate material that is permitted to flow back into the fluidized bed 130.
Turning now to
The apertures 242 extending through the distributor plate 240 may be oriented in a pattern such as a directional pattern to control a flow of the fluid heat stream toward a particular direction. For example,
The fluidizing collector 220 can also, although not necessary, include an in-collector heater (not shown) that may be operatively coupled to a fluid heat stream to provide additional heat and drying of the coal. The in-collector heater may be fed by any fluid heat stream available in the power plant including primary heat streams, waste streams, and any combination there.
As illustrated in
Referring back to
Referring to FIGS. 7-9A-9C, if multiple scrubber assemblies 200 are utilized a junction 300 may be operatively disposed between the scrubber assemblies 200 and fluidized dryer bed 130. As particularly illustrated in
When the non-fluidizing material reaches a predetermined limit (weight or volume) or a predetermined amount of time has elapsed (between openings), gate 270 opens permitting the non-fluidized material and accumulated fluid pressure to be discharged. As illustrated in
Chute 340 also includes a discharge port 348 opposed to and in fluid communication with vent 344. As the non-fluidized material is discharged from fluidizing collector 220 gravitational forces draw the material into a tote or container 350 to be transported for disposal or further processing. A conveyor belt or similar structure may also be utilized to catch and transport the non-fluidized material from scrubber assembly 200. The further processing may include disposing of the non-fluidized material. If the non-fluidized material is salvageable it may be processed through an air jig that can further separate contaminated material from non-contaminated material.
In one example embodiment of the invention, chute 340 may also include a door or access window 360 operatively disposed proximate gate 270 to permit an operator to view the discharging of the coal. Door 360 may be hingedly or slidably disposed to a portion of chute 340 such that an operator may open door 360 if chute 340 should become clogged or gate 270 is in need of repair.
In another embodiment of the present invention, as particularly illustrated in
Distributor plates 362a and 362b are preferably sloped or angled toward gates 364a and 364b respectively to allow gravitational forces to aid in drawing the non-fluidized material into the fluidizing collectors 360a and 360b. Gates 364a and 364b are periodically opened to permit accumulated non-fluidized material to be discharged into a tote or onto a conveyor system for further processing. In one embodiment of the invention, gates 364a and 364b are opened only for very small duration of time. During the time they are opened a negative pressure is created in the fluidizing collectors 360a and 360b causing an outwardly directed airflow to push the non-fluidized material out of the collectors 360a and 360b. In an example embodiment, chutes (not shown) may also be operatively coupled to the fluidizing collectors 360a and 360b to direct a flow of non-fluidized material and a flow of air and/or air and particulate material out of the fluidizing collectors 360a and 360b.
In any of the embodiments having a scrubber assembly 220, as the fine particulate material flows into the fluidized dryer bed 130 it mixes with the other fine particulate material. Returning to
The dried coal stream is discharged airborne over a second weir 184 at the discharge end 122 of the fluidized bed dryer 130, and elutriated fines 116 and moist air are discharged through the top of the dryer unit. This second stage 138 can also be used to further separate fly ash and other impurities from the coal 12. Segregated material will be removed from the second stage 138 via multiple extraction points 186 and 188 located at the bottom of the bed 130 (or wherever else that is appropriate), as shown in
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/107,153 filed on Apr. 15, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,275,644, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/618,379 filed on Oct. 12, 2004, which are hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2101295 | Rusk | Dec 1937 | A |
2303367 | Kendall et al. | Dec 1942 | A |
2512422 | Fletcher et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
2586818 | Harms | Feb 1952 | A |
2600425 | Parry | Jun 1952 | A |
2671968 | Criner | Mar 1954 | A |
2932395 | Marot | Apr 1960 | A |
3007577 | Putman | Nov 1961 | A |
3090131 | Waterman, Jr. | May 1963 | A |
3140862 | Schoppe | Jul 1964 | A |
3238634 | Groins | Mar 1966 | A |
3246750 | Chase et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
3262214 | Webb | Jul 1966 | A |
3331754 | Mansfield | Jul 1967 | A |
3409131 | Alfred et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3434932 | Mansfield | Mar 1969 | A |
3471016 | Everson et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3539001 | Binnex et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3654705 | Smith et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3687431 | Parks | Aug 1972 | A |
3687743 | Parks | Aug 1972 | A |
3721014 | Voelskow | Mar 1973 | A |
3728230 | Kemmetmueller | Apr 1973 | A |
3734289 | Pearman | May 1973 | A |
3744145 | Maxwell et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3774759 | Weintraub et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3800427 | Kemmetmueller | Apr 1974 | A |
3842461 | Wurster | Oct 1974 | A |
3852168 | Oetiker | Dec 1974 | A |
3856441 | Suzukawa et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3959084 | Price | May 1976 | A |
3960513 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3968052 | Seglin et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3985516 | Johnson | Oct 1976 | A |
4028228 | Ferris et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4030895 | Caughey | Jun 1977 | A |
4052168 | Koppelman | Oct 1977 | A |
4053364 | Poersch et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4073481 | Lawson et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4100033 | Holter | Jul 1978 | A |
4126519 | Murray | Nov 1978 | A |
4152843 | Kemmetmueller | May 1979 | A |
4155313 | Moss | May 1979 | A |
4174946 | Rohde | Nov 1979 | A |
4176011 | Knappstein | Nov 1979 | A |
4192650 | Seitzer | Mar 1980 | A |
4196676 | Brown et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4201541 | Schoppe | May 1980 | A |
4230559 | Smith | Oct 1980 | A |
4236318 | Heard et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4240877 | Stahlherm et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4245395 | Potter | Jan 1981 | A |
4253821 | Bradshaw | Mar 1981 | A |
4253825 | Fasano | Mar 1981 | A |
4265737 | Smith et al. | May 1981 | A |
4266539 | Parker et al. | May 1981 | A |
4276120 | Lutz | Jun 1981 | A |
4280418 | Erhard | Jul 1981 | A |
4282088 | Ennis | Aug 1981 | A |
4284416 | Nahas | Aug 1981 | A |
4284476 | Wagener et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4292742 | Ekberg | Oct 1981 | A |
4294807 | Randolph | Oct 1981 | A |
4295281 | Potter | Oct 1981 | A |
4299694 | Goodell | Nov 1981 | A |
4300291 | Heard et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4308102 | Wagener et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4310501 | Reh et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4324544 | Blake | Apr 1982 | A |
4330946 | Courneya | May 1982 | A |
4331445 | Burns | May 1982 | A |
4338160 | Dellessard et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4349367 | Krumwiede | Sep 1982 | A |
4354903 | Weber et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4383379 | Avril | May 1983 | A |
4389794 | Bitterly | Jun 1983 | A |
4409101 | Salikhov et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4430161 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4431485 | Petrovic et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4436589 | Petrovic et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4440625 | Go et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4444129 | Ladt | Apr 1984 | A |
4449483 | Strohmeyer | May 1984 | A |
4455135 | Bitterly | Jun 1984 | A |
4468288 | Galow et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4470878 | Petrovic et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4481724 | Petrovic et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4492040 | Jensen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4493157 | Wicker | Jan 1985 | A |
4495710 | Ottoson | Jan 1985 | A |
4506608 | Strohmeyer, Jr. | Mar 1985 | A |
4523388 | Cuel | Jun 1985 | A |
4530700 | Sawyer et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4533438 | Michael et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4567674 | Strohmeyer, Jr. | Feb 1986 | A |
4571174 | Shelton | Feb 1986 | A |
4574744 | Lorenz et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4575418 | Robbins | Mar 1986 | A |
4583301 | Crowley et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4583468 | Reed et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4589981 | Barari et al. | May 1986 | A |
4606793 | Petrovic et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4617744 | Siddoway et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4619732 | Clay et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4627173 | O'Hagan et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635379 | Kroneld | Jan 1987 | A |
4635380 | Anderson | Jan 1987 | A |
4640873 | Tajima | Feb 1987 | A |
4644664 | Bradshaw | Feb 1987 | A |
4655436 | Williams | Apr 1987 | A |
4668255 | Govind | May 1987 | A |
4705533 | Simmons | Nov 1987 | A |
4725337 | Green | Feb 1988 | A |
4736711 | Marlair et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4754869 | Hutchinson et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760650 | Theliander et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4790748 | Litt et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4795037 | Rich, Jr. | Jan 1989 | A |
4800015 | Simmons | Jan 1989 | A |
4809537 | Glover et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4810258 | Greene | Mar 1989 | A |
4822383 | Brose et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4842695 | Schmid et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4852384 | Woolbert et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4882274 | Pyne, Jr. et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4888885 | Caughey | Dec 1989 | A |
4908124 | Goldbach et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4945656 | Judd | Aug 1990 | A |
4950388 | Stafford | Aug 1990 | A |
4957049 | Strohmeyer, Jr. | Sep 1990 | A |
4975257 | Lin | Dec 1990 | A |
5024681 | Chang | Jun 1991 | A |
5024770 | Boyd et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5033208 | Ohno et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5035721 | Atherton | Jul 1991 | A |
5046265 | Kalb | Sep 1991 | A |
5087269 | Cha et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5087351 | Vallentine, Sr. | Feb 1992 | A |
5103743 | Berg | Apr 1992 | A |
5120431 | Cordonnier | Jun 1992 | A |
5132007 | Meyer et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5137539 | Bowling | Aug 1992 | A |
5137545 | Walker | Aug 1992 | A |
5145489 | Dunlap | Sep 1992 | A |
5146857 | Spliethoff et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5158580 | Chang | Oct 1992 | A |
5171406 | Shang et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192398 | Kress et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197398 | Levy et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5223088 | Hansen | Jun 1993 | A |
5244099 | Zaltzman et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5248387 | Hansen | Sep 1993 | A |
5283959 | Nagayoshi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5285581 | Walker | Feb 1994 | A |
5289920 | Godderidge et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5291668 | Becker et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299694 | Rambaud | Apr 1994 | A |
5322530 | Merriam et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327717 | Hauk | Jul 1994 | A |
5361513 | Woessner | Nov 1994 | A |
5372791 | Abdulally | Dec 1994 | A |
5373648 | Wolf | Dec 1994 | A |
5399194 | Cochran et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403365 | Merriam et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5426932 | Morihara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430270 | Findlan et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5471955 | Dietz | Dec 1995 | A |
5491969 | Cohn et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5501162 | Kravets | Mar 1996 | A |
5503646 | McKenney et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5527365 | Colemann et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534137 | Griggs et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537941 | Goldich | Jul 1996 | A |
5546875 | Selle et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547549 | Fracas | Aug 1996 | A |
5601703 | Szymocha et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5637336 | Kannenberg et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5683494 | Altman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5735061 | Lawrence | Apr 1998 | A |
5795484 | Greenwald, Sr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5827352 | Altman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830246 | Dunlop | Nov 1998 | A |
5830247 | Dunlop | Nov 1998 | A |
5832848 | Reynoldson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5853548 | Piskorz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858035 | Dunlop | Jan 1999 | A |
5867921 | Maruyama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869810 | Reynolds et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5904741 | Dunlop et al. | May 1999 | A |
5948143 | Sjostrom et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961693 | Altman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5996808 | Levy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6065224 | Eigner | May 2000 | A |
6085912 | Hacking, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096118 | Altman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6148599 | McIntosh et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151799 | Jones | Nov 2000 | A |
6162265 | Dunlop et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6249988 | Duske et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298579 | Ichitani et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302945 | Altman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355094 | Schomaker et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6422392 | Levy | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6447559 | Hunt | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488740 | Patel et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500241 | Reddy | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6536133 | Snaper | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547854 | Gray et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584699 | Ronning et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610263 | Pahlman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6712878 | Chang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6755892 | Nalette et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6783739 | Altman | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6789488 | Levy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799097 | Villareal Antelo et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6880263 | Gasparini et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889842 | Sandlin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6907996 | Fraas | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6912889 | Stephanos et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7237679 | Hendrickson et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7357903 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020184787 | Ronning et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030000228 | Leuenberger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046826 | Snaper | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040194337 | Gasparini et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060112588 | Ness et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070251120 | Connell | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070256316 | Jordison et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080028631 | Leahy | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080028634 | Leahy | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080201980 | Bullinger | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090249641 | Graham et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
67 770 | Jul 1969 | DE |
22 50 000 | Apr 1974 | DE |
31 25 629 | Feb 1983 | DE |
40 03 499 | Aug 1990 | DE |
41 05 128 | Aug 1992 | DE |
43 23 469 | Jan 1995 | DE |
19518644 | May 1995 | DE |
195 10 006 | Sep 1996 | DE |
199 31 346 | Dec 2000 | DE |
2 327 442 | Jan 1999 | GB |
56014578 | Feb 1981 | JP |
62-215691 | Sep 1987 | JP |
08 270355 | Oct 1996 | JP |
11-267591 | Oct 1999 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Weiss H J et al, “Trocknung Von Braunkohle in Der Dampf-Wirbelschicht”, VGB Kraftwekstechnik, vol. 71, No. 7, Jul. 1, 1991, pp. 664-668. |
Klutz Von H-J et al, “Das WTA-Verfahren als Vortrocknungsstufe fur moderne Kraftwerkskonzepte auf Basis Braunkohle”, VGB Kraftwerkstechnik, vol. 76, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1996, pp. 224-229. |
Doell, Glenn “Dais-Analytic Corporation: An Energy Technology Company,” (Mar. 22, 2001). |
Bullinger, et al. “Coal Drying Improves Performance and Reduces Emissions,” 27th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems (Clearwater, FL) (Mar. 4-7, 2002). |
Sarunac, et al. “Coal Drying Improves Performance and Reduces Emissions,” EPRI Heat Rate Improvement Conference (Birmingham, AL) (Jan. 2003). |
Bullinger, Charles “Fuel Enhancement by Incremental Moisture Reduction,” 18th International Low Rank Coal (Jun. 25, 2003). |
Ness, et al. “Pilot Coal Dryer Testing Summary,” TMRA Clean Coal Technology Workshop (Feb. 5, 2004). |
Ness, et al. “Pilot Fluidized Bed Coal Dryer: Operating Experience and Preliminary Results,” 29th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems (Apr. 18-22, 2004). |
Levy, et al. Upgrading Low-Rank Coals Symposium (May 2, 2004). |
Ness, et al. “Pilot Fluidized Bed Coal Dryer: Operating Experience and Preliminary Results,” 19th Western Fuels Symposium (Billings, MT) (Oct. 12-14, 2004). |
Sarunac, et al. “Impact of Coal Drying on Power Plant Efficiency, Operation and Emissions,” 30th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems (Clearwater, FL) (Apr. 2005). |
Sarunac, et al. “Comparison of Various Coal Drying Process Layouts and Their Impact on Plant Efficiency, Operation and Emissions,” 30th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems (Clearwater, FL) (Apr. 2005). |
Levy, et al. “The Impact of Coal Drying on Low Rank Coal Fired Power Plants,” Lexington, KY Conference (May 2005). |
Lehigh University “Performance and Emissions: Key Factors in Today's Competitive Energy Market” Bethlehem, PA Conference (May 25-26, 2005). |
Merriam, Norman W. “Removal of Mercury from Powder River Basin Coal by Low-Temperature Thermal Treatment,” Report Under DOE CRADA Filed by Western Research Institute (Jul. 1993). |
James, Dennis R. “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: Incremental Reduction Project (Phase I) Revision I,” 1st NDIC Grant Application (Feb. 14, 2000). |
Dr. Moen, et al. “Lignite Coal Dryer Project (for Great River Energy, Coal Creek Station),” Report (May 12, 2000). |
James, Dennis R. “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: Incremental Reduction Project (Phase I),” Status Report No. 2 (Aug. 10, 2000). |
Bullinger, Charlie “Lignite Fuel Enhancement (Maximizing the Value (i.e., Lowest Cost of Electricity Produced and Reduced Emissions) of Lignite Fuel Through Incremental Moisture Reduction,” DOE Project Proposal (Apr. 19, 2001). |
Bullinger, Charlie “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: (Significantly Enhancing the Value of U.S. Lignite Fuel Its Abundant, Low-Cost and Environmentally Responsible),” DOE Project Proposal (Apr. 19, 2001). |
Scheffknecht, Gunter “Technologies for Efficient Utilization of Low-Rank Fuels,” (May 17-18, 2001). |
James, Dennis R. “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: Incremental Moisture Reduction,” Final Report for Phase 1 (Dec. 14, 2001). |
Kakaras, et al. “Computer Simulation Studies for the Integration of an External Dryer into a Greek Lignite-Fired Power Plant,” 81 Fuel 583-93 (2002). |
Kravetse, A. “Enhanced Rankine Cycle-Significant Reduction in NOx Emissions and Heat Rate in Both Existing and New Coal Fired Power Plants” (Unknown). |
Bullinger, Charlie “Lignite Fuel Enhancement” Project Proposal (Jul. 31, 2002). |
“Research Demonstrates Benefits of Drying Western Coal,” Lehigh Energy Update, vol. 20(2) (Aug. 2002). |
“Increasing Power Plant Efficiency-Lignite Fuel Enhancement,” DOE Project Facts Website (May 20, 2003). |
Levy, Edward K. “Use of Coal Drying to Reduce Water Consumed in Pulverized Coal Power Plants,” First Quarterly Report to DOE (Mar. 2003). |
Ness, Mark “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: Incremental Moisture Reduction Program Phase II Oct. 2003 Status Report,” (Oct. 24, 2003). |
Feeley et al. “Innovative Approaches and Technologies for Improved Power Plant Water Management,” U.S. DOE Program Facts (Jan. 1, 2004). |
Levy, et al. “Use of Coal Drying to Reduce Water Consumed in Pulverized Coal Power Plants,” Fourth Quarterly Report to DOE (Jan. 1, 2004). |
Levy, Edward “Performance Evaluation of Coal Creek Pilot Dryer,” Prepared for Mark Ness of GRE for Coal Creek Station (Feb. 6, 2004). |
Thwing, Theo “Lehigh Research Aids Power Plants,” The Brown and White (Lehigh Student Newspaper) (Feb. 8, 2004). |
Ness, Mark “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: Incremental Moisture Reduction Program Phase II Feb. 2004 Status Report,” (Feb. 29, 2004). |
Levy, et al. “Use of Coal Drying to Reduce Water Consumed in Pulverized Coal Power Plants,” Fifth Quarterly Report to DOE (Apr. 1, 2004). |
Levy, et al. “Separation of Ash From Lignite in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed,” Presented for Mark Ness of GRE for Coal Creek Station (Apr. 23, 2004). |
Levy, et al. “Use of Coal Drying to Reduce Water Consumed in Pulverized Coal Power Plants,” Sixth Quarterly Report to DOE (Jul. 1, 2004). |
Guffey, et al. “Thermal Pretreatment of Low-Ranked Coal for Control of Mercury Emissions,” 85 Fuel Processing Technology 521-31 (2004). |
Weinstein, et al. “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: Incremental Moisture Reduction,” Memorandum. |
Levy, et al. “Use of Coal Drying to Reduce Water Consumed in Pulverized Coal Power Plants,” Seventh Quarterly Report to DOE (Oct. 2004). |
Ness, Mark “Pilot Fluidized Bed Coal Dryer: Test 48, 49, 50, 52, 57, 58, and 59 Results,” (Dec. 26, 2004). |
Dubrovich, Matthew “Ash Separation From Lignite Using a Bubbling Fluidized Bed,” Thesis Paper Presented to the Graduate and Research Committee of Lehigh University (Jan. 21, 2005). |
Ness, Mark “Lignite Fuel Enhancement: Incremental Moisture Reduction Program Phase II Mar. 2005 Final Report,” Report to NDIC (Mar. 31, 2005). |
Armor, Tony “Interest Group on Drying of Wet Fuels Using Waste Heat,” (Unknown). |
Niro, Inc., “Fluid Bed Processing Systems,” http:// www.niroinc.com/html/drying/fluidbed.html (Unknown). |
Niro, Inc., “Particulate Processing: Fluid Bed Processors,” http://niroinc.com/html/drying/fluidbed.html (2001). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070193926 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60618379 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11107153 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11649685 | US |