Various components are provided into a well to complete the well. Such components include casing, tubing strings, control lines, sensors, control devices, valves, packers, mandrels and so forth. Once such components are installed, a perforating operation is typically performed to extend perforations through tubings and/or casing and into the surrounding formation. The perforations enable the communication of fluids between the surrounding formation and the wellbore.
To perform a perforating operation, a perforating gun is lowered into the well to a target depth. However, prior to firing the perforating gun, a well operator has to first ensure that the perforating gun will not fire in a direction that would destroy downhole components such as control lines, sensors, control devices, tubing strings, and so forth. Conventionally, various orientation techniques have been employed to identify a direction of perforation for the perforating gun that would not destroy downhole components.
One technique that has been employed is to use detection tools that emit an electromagnetic field and that can detect distortion in the magnetic field induced by a target component (such as a tubing string, control line, sensor, a mass positioned at a predetermined location, and so forth). The distortion can be used to determine the location of the target component. However, if a ferromagnetic layer (such as the layer of a steel casing or steel tubing) is provided between the target component and the detector tool, or beyond the target component and the detector tool, then the ferromagnetic layer can potentially interfere with accurate detection of the location of the target component based on detecting distortion caused by the target component.
The inability to accurately detect the location of a downhole component may result in destruction of the component if a perforating gun is inadvertently fired in the direction of such component. Usually, it is quite expensive to replace the destroyed component, since completion hardware must be removed from a well to perform replacement or repair operations.
In general, according to an embodiment, an apparatus for use in a well comprises a structure having at least a first portion formed of a first material, and a detector to detect a signal associated with a component located either within or beyond the structure, where the first material has a property that reduces attenuation of the signal.
Other or alternative features or embodiments will become apparent from the following description, from the drawings, and from the claims.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
As used here, the terms “up” and “down”; “upper” and “lower”; “upwardly” and downwardly”; “upstream” and “downstream”; “above” and “below”; and other like terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or element are used in this description to more clearly describe some embodiments of the invention. However, when applied to equipment and methods for use in wells that are deviated or horizontal, such terms may refer to a left to right, right to left, or other relationship as appropriate.
Referring to
It is desired that the explosive device in tool 110 when fired does not cause damage to the other tubing string 106. Thus, the tool 110 is oriented such that the explosive device of the tool 110 fires in a direction (or directions) away from the tubing string 106. In an alternative arrangement, another component can be located in the wellbore 102 in addition to or instead of the tubing string 106. Such other component can include a sensor, a control device, a control line, an electric cable, or some other downhole component that should not be damaged by firing of the explosive device in the tool 110.
To accomplish orientation of tool 110, the tool string 108 includes a motor 112 that is able to rotate the tool 110 with respect to the remaining portion of the tool string 108. To fix the position of the tool string 108 inside the tubing string 104, the tool string 108 includes an anchor module 114. Note that multiple anchor modules can be provided in the tool string 108, although only one is depicted in
Once the anchor module 114 is set, activation of the motor 112 is able to rotate the tool 110 along with other parts of the tool, such as the portion including a sonde 116. A “sonde” refers to a device that is part of the tool string 108 used for detecting an azimuthal location of another component in the wellbore. The “azimuthal location” of a component refers to the angular orientation of the component around the circumference of the wellbore. In other words, this angular orientation is measured in a plane that is generally perpendicular to an axis of the wellbore interval where the measurement is taking place.
In the arrangement depicted in
The detector 120 in the sonde 116 is used to detect a signal (or signals) associated with the target component to be detected by the sonde 116. In the example of
The tag 126 can be omitted in other implementations. Also, alternatively, instead of being attached to the tubing string 106, the tag 126 can be positioned away from the tubing string 106 (e.g., at a 180° offset, 90° offset, or other offset from the tubing string 106). By positioning the tag 126 at a location that is azimuthally or angularly offset from the tubing string 106, the explosive device in the tool 110 can be oriented to shoot toward the tag 126 to avoid shooting in the direction of the tubing string 106.
Note that the target component to be detected by the sonde 116 is located “beyond” the tubing string 104. A component is said to be located “beyond” a structure from the sonde 116 if the component is separated from the sonde 116 by the structure. Thus, in the arrangement of
In the implementation where the sonde 116 employs electromagnetic signals, an alternating electric current is supplied to an exciter coil (such as a solenoid-type coil) in the transmitter 118. The exciter coil produces a primary electromagnetic flux field (a magnetic field). The magnetic field propagates radially into the surrounding tubing string 104 wall and surrounding wellbore environment. The magnetic field is distorted by components in the surrounding environment, including the tubing string 106 and tag 126 (if present). The distorted magnetic field is received by a reference coil (or detector coil), or plural reference or detector coils, in the detector 120.
The distortion of the magnetic field caused by the components in the surrounding wellbore environment causes changes in amplitude and phase of signal(s) received by the detector 120, where the signal(s) result(s) from the distorted magnetic field. The signal(s) received by the detector 120 is(are) considered a signal(s) associated with a target component such as the tubing string 106 and/or tag 126.
The received signal(s) is(are) provided to a control module 146 (which can be located at the earth surface or somewhere in the wellbore 102). The control module processes the signal(s) and determines the azimuthal location of the tubing string 106 based on processing the signal(s). If the control module is located at the earth surface, the received signal(s) by the detector 120 are communicated to such control module by a telemetry module 122 over a cable 124. The cable 124 can be an electric cable, a fiber optic cable, or some other type of communications cable.
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, to reduce attenuation of signals caused by the tubing string 104, at least a section 130 of the tubing string 104 (in the proximity of the sonde 116) is formed of a material that has a property to reduce attenuation of signals received by the detector 120 for the purpose of detecting an azimuthal location of the tubing string 106. The section 130 is in an interval where detection of the azimuthal location of a target component is to occur.
Note that in some embodiments, the tubing string 104 has just a section 130 that is formed of the first material. The remaining sections (132, 134) of the tubing string 104 can be formed of a second material that causes greater attenuation of signals than the first material. The term “attenuation” or “attenuate” when referring to signals received by the sonde 116 for detecting the azimuthal location of another component in the wellbore refers to reduction by interference, reduction by absorption, increase in background noise, or other type of masking that reduces the ability of the sonde 116 to accurately determine the azimuthal location of the component in the well.
As an example, to reduce attenuation of a magnetic field generated by the transmitter 118 in the sonde 116, the first material forming the section 130 of the tubing string 104 is made of a non-ferromagnetic material such as stainless steel, titanium, fiberglass, and so forth. Because stainless steel, titanium, and fiberglass are typically more expensive than steel (which is the material normally used to form tubing strings in a well), the amount of such non-ferromagnetic materials is limited in the tubing string 104 to reduce costs. Consequently, in the implementation depicted in
In the implementation where the sonde 116 detects the azimuthal location of the target component based on acoustic detection, the transmitter 118 in the sonde 116 emits acoustic pings radially outwardly. The detector 120 in the sonde 116 receives reflected acoustic signals from surrounding structures, such as the tubing string 106 and/or tag 126. The azimuthal location of the target component is determined based on the reflected acoustic signals.
To reduce attenuation of acoustic signals reflected from the target component, it is desired that the section 130 of the tubing string 104 in the proximity of the sonde 116 be formed of a first material that reduces reflection of acoustic signals transmitted from the sonde 116. Generally, each interface (e.g. interface between fluid and tubing wall surface, interface between fluid and target component surface, etc.) will cause reflection of acoustic signals. Reflected acoustic signals from the interfaces of the tubing string 104 wall and surrounding fluid are considered noise that causes reduction in the ability to detect reflected acoustic signals from the target component. Thus, instead of using steel in the tubing string section 130 (which is associated with relatively high velocities of reflections), an alternative material (e.g., chrome, plastic, rubber, etc.) can be used instead in the tubing string section 130 to reduce amplitudes of acoustic reflections from the tubing string 104. The section 130 thus is formed of a material that has a lower acoustic reflection property. The reduction of the amplitudes of acoustic reflections from the tubing string 104 results in improved signal-to-noise ratio so that the acoustic signals reflected from the target component can be better detected by the sonde 116. In other words, the section 130 of the tubing string 104 is said to reduce attenuation of the acoustic signals (reflected acoustic signals) associated with the target component.
In an alternative implementation, instead of the sonde 116 emitting acoustic signals that are reflected by the target component (e.g., tubing string 106 and/or tag 126), a source of acoustic signals can be provided, where the acoustic signal source emits acoustic signals that are received by the sonde 116. The acoustic signal source can be provided in the tag 126, or in a location away from the tubing string 106. In this alternative implementation, forming the section 130 of the tubing string 104 out of a material with reduced acoustic reflection property similarly enhances the ability of the sonde 116 to more accurately detect the azimuthal location of the target component. Another source of acoustic signal may be another tool string 108 located inside the tubing 106. In this configuration, the source 118 will generate the acoustic signal and will be detected on the tool 108 inside the tubing 104.
In the implementation where the sonde 116 detects the azimuthal location of the target component based on nuclear signals (e.g. gamma-ray radiation), the sonde 116 does not include the transmitter 118. Instead, the sonde 116 includes the detector 120 to receive nuclear signals emitted by a nuclear-signal source (e.g., gamma-ray radiation source) in the tag 126. The azimuthal location of the target component is determined based on the emitted nuclear signals.
To reduce attenuation of the nuclear signals emitted by the tag 126 in this implementation, the section 130 of the tubing string 104 can be (1) formed of a material that reduces absorption of nuclear radiation as compared to steel or other typical material used to form the tubing string 104; or (2) formed of a thinner layer of material (e.g., thinner layer of steel) to reduce absorption of nuclear radiation. In other words, the section 130 of the tubing string 104 is said to reduce attenuation of the emitted nuclear signals associated with the target component (tag 126).
In the example embodiment shown in
An optional tag 202 can be positioned close to the control line 200 to enhance the ability of the sonde 116 in the tool string 108 to detect the azimuthal location of the control line 200. Alternatively, the optional tag 202 can be positioned at an azimuthally offset location from the control line 200 such that an explosive force can be directed towards the tag 202 to avoid damaging the control line 200. In alternative implementations, instead of the control line 200, sensors, control devices, and other target components can be positioned outside the casing 248 in the cement layer 204.
As with the implementation of
In the implementations where the sonde 116 detects the azimuthal location of a target component based on acoustic or nuclear signals, the section 250 of the casing 248 (or the entire casing 248) is formed of a material to reduce attenuation of reflected acoustic signals or nuclear signals associated with the target component (e.g., control line 200 and/or tag 202).
Note that the tool 108 in
While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5541889 | Priest et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
6003597 | Newman | Dec 1999 | A |
6378607 | Ryan | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6945330 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20020185275 | Yang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030188867 | Parrott | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050247484 | Brune et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0412535 | Feb 1991 | EP |
2195023 | Mar 1988 | GB |
2374887 | Oct 2002 | GB |
2390627 | Jan 2004 | GB |
1997021117 | Jun 1997 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070034374 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |