The present invention relates generally to information networks and specifically to transmitting information such as media information over communication lines such as coax, thereby to form a communications network.
Many structures, including homes, have networks based on coaxial cable (“coax”).
The Multimedia over Coax Alliance (“MoCA™”), provides at its website (www.mocalliance.org) an example of a specification (viz., that available under the trademark MoCA, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) for networking of digital video and entertainment information through coaxial cable. The specification has been distributed to an open membership.
Technologies available under the trademark MoCA, other specifications and related technologies (“the existing technologies”) often utilize unused bandwidth available on the coax. For example, coax has been installed in more than 70% of homes in the United States. Some homes have existing coax in one or more primary entertainment consumption locations such as family rooms, media rooms and master bedrooms. The existing technologies allow homeowners to utilize installed coax as a networking system and to deliver entertainment and information programming with high quality of service (“QoS”).
The existing technologies may provide high speed (270 mbps), high QoS, and the innate security of a shielded, wired connection combined with state of the art packet-level encryption. Coax is designed for carrying high bandwidth video. Today, it is regularly used to securely deliver millions of dollars of pay per view and premium video content on a daily basis. Networks based on the existing technologies can be used as a backbone for multiple wireless access points to extend the reach of wireless service in the structure.
Existing technologies provide throughput through the existing coaxial cables to the places where the video devices are located in a structure without affecting other service signals that may be present on the cable. The existing technologies provide a link for digital entertainment, and may act in concert with other wired and wireless networks to extend entertainment throughout the structure.
The existing technologies work with access technologies such as asymmetric digital subscriber lines (“ADSL”), very high speed digital subscriber lines (“VDSL”), and Fiber to the Home (“FTTH”), which provide signals that typically enter the structure on a twisted pair or on an optical fiber, operating in a frequency band from a few hundred kilohertz to 8.5 MHz for ADSL and 12 MHz for VDSL. As services reach such a structure via any type of digital subscriber line (“xDSL”) or FTTH, they may be routed via the existing technologies and the coax to the video devices. Cable functionalities, such as video, voice and Internet access, may be provided to the structure, via coax, by cable operators, and use coax running within the structure to reach individual cable service consuming devices in the structure. Typically, functionalities of the existing technologies run along with cable functionalities, but on different frequencies.
The coax infrastructure inside the structure typically includes coax, splitters and outlets. Splitters typically have one input and two or more outputs and are designed to transmit signals in the forward direction (input to output), in the backward direction (output to input), and to isolate outputs from different splitters, thus preventing signals from flowing from one coax outlet to another. Isolation is useful in order to a) reduce interference from other devices and b) maximize power transfer from Point Of Entry (“POE”) to outlets for best TV reception.
Elements of the existing technologies are specifically designed to propagate backward through splitters (“insertion”) and from output to output (“isolation”). One outlet in a structure can be reached from another by a single “isolation jump” and a number of “insertion jumps.” Typically isolation jumps have an attenuation of 5 to 40 dB and each insertion jump attenuates approximately 3 dB. MoCA™-identified technology has a dynamic range in excess of 55 dB while supporting 200 Mbps throughput. Therefore MoCA™-identified technology can work effectively through a significant number of splitters.
Managed network schemes, such as MoCAT™-identified technology, are specifically designed to support streaming video with minimal packet loss between outlets.
When a network-connected device receives a data signal from the network, which may be a network such as that described above, the signal is often decomposed into in-phase (“I”) and quadrature (“Q”) portions during down-conversion to device base-band frequency. When the I and Q portions are recombined for data decryption, they are often imbalanced with respect to amplitude, phase or both. Rebalancing I and Q portions may involve calculating compensation factors based on frequency-domain signatures of the carrier frequency and the I and Q portions. In the presence of carrier frequency uncertainty, the frequency-domain signatures of received signals may be difficult to resolve using digital computation methods. It would therefore be desirable to provide systems and methods for compensating signals, in the presence of carrier frequency uncertainty, using digital computation methods.
A system and/or method for compensating for an I/Q imbalance at a node on a communication network, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
The above and other features of the present invention, its nature and various advantages will be more apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and in which:
12A shows an illustrative simulation minimization and
Apparatus and methods for compensating for an I/Q imbalance are provided in accordance with the principles of the invention. The methods may include compensating for an imbalance between a first component of a data signal and a second component of the data signal. The data signal may be modulated by a carrier signal having a frequency error. The first component may be characterized by at least one parameter. The method may include receiving the data and carrier signals; selecting a value for the parameter such that a frequency domain energy is reduced, the frequency domain energy corresponding to a negative frequency; and modifying at least one of the components based on the selected value.
The apparatus may include a circuit operative to record signal values corresponding to frequency components of a received signal. The signal may be one that carries at least one orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (“OFDM”) symbol. The signal values may correspond to a carrier frequency having a frequency error; a first tone; and a second tone.
The apparatus may include a system for compensating for an imbalance between a first component of a data signal and a second component of the data signal. The data signal may be modulated by a carrier signal having a frequency error. The first component may be characterized by at least one parameter. The system may include a hardware module configured to quantify a signal value corresponding to one of the data and carrier signals; and a software module configured to receive the signal value from the hardware.
The first and second tones may be transmitted in the context of a MoCA protocol probe2 transmission as set forth in the aforementioned MoCA specification.
Illustrative features of the invention are described below with reference to
In some embodiments, I/Q imbalance compensation may be performed during MoCA Probe2 burst reception. Probe2 is a two-tone signal which can be used for I/Q imbalance calculations or other RF calibrations in the receiver. A PHY layer performs bin selection and recording and the result is uploaded to the CPU for the I/Q compensation parameters calculations.
Signal 209 passes to variable rate interpolator 224, which resamples signal 209 to an appropriate sampling rate.
The variable rate interpolator 224 may receive timing signal 237 from numerically controlled oscillator (“NCO”) timing generator 236. Timing signal 237 may be based on carrier frequency offset estimate (“CFOE”) 241, from preamble processor 240. CFOE 241 may be based on a preamble processor 240 estimate. Interpolator 224 outputs signal 225, which may then pass through high pass filter (“HPF”) 228 to reject direct current (“DC”) signal components.
Carrier recovery loop 229 may be present to perform frequency compensation for intentional frequency error 213. Carrier recovery loop 229 may receive input from NCO frequency generator 234, which may be controlled by receiver controller 232. NCO frequency generator 234 may receive carrier frequency offset estimate 241 from preamble processor 240. A cyclic prefix may be removed from signal 225 at CP remover 246.
Fast Fourier transform module 298 may be present in frequency domain processing module 206 to transform signal 225 into frequency domain information (“FFT output”) that may be stored in memory 299 and may be communicated to probe2 software processing routine 250, which may output correction parameters 252 for return to I/Q imbalance compensation module 218.
Signal 309 passes to baseband-mode demixer 320. Receiver 300 may include automatic gain controller 322, which may provide feedback to gain 310 based on signal 309. From demixer 320, signal 309 may pass to Farrow interpolator 324, which resamples 100 MHz signal 309 at a lower rate.
Farrow interpolator 324 may receive timing signal 337 from numerically controlled oscillator (“NCO”) timing generator 336. Timing signal 337 may be based on carrier frequency offset estimate 341, from preamble control processor 340. Carrier frequency offset estimate 341 may be based on the output of TD phase rotator 330 (discussed below), via preamble processor 340. In some embodiments, interpolator 324 outputs signal 325 at 100 MHz. Signal 325 may be synchronized to a transmitter clock (not shown) via a timing recover loop (not shown). Signal 325 may be down-sampled by a factor of 2, via half band filter decimator (“HB DEC 2→1”) 326, to 50 MHz. Signal 325 may then pass through high pass filter (“HPF”) 328 to reject direct current (“DC”) signal components.
Time domain (“TD”) phase rotator 330 may be present to perform frequency compensation for intentional frequency error 313. TD phase rotator may receive input from NCO frequency generator 334, which may be controlled by receiver controller 332. NCO frequency generator 334 may receive carrier frequency offset estimate 341 from preamble processor 340. Signal 325 may then pass to delay buffer 342. A cyclic prefix may be removed at sub-circuit 346. In some embodiments, sub-circuit 346 may perform receiver windowing to reduce damage from narrow band interference noise that might otherwise leak into adjacent tones.
Fast Fourier transform module 398 may be present in frequency domain processing module 306 to transform signal 325 into frequency domain information that may be communicated to probe2 calculator 350, which may output probe2 result 352, for transmission to I/Q compensation module 318.
Some embodiments include a bypass mode, in which signal input is routed to output around I/Q imbalance compensation module 318.
In some embodiments, I/Q compensation is accomplished by digital signal analysis and processing. In those embodiments, ζ, ρ & Scale_Q are I/Q compensation parameters that have to be estimated during Probe2.
Equation 1 shows compensated real and imaginary portions of a compensated signal that would be output from the I/Q imbalance compensation. module (see
Initial hardware operation 602 may include numerically controlled oscillator (“NCO”) phase reset 604. The phase of the first sample of an FFT window that results from Time Domain Unit (“TDU”) frequency compensation is determined. For this purpose the NCO Phase of the Phase Rotator in the Receiver TDU shall be reset to zero anytime after fine frequency compensation has been computed. The number of samples (number of phase accumulations) between the reset of the NCO and the first sample of the FFT window denoted as Δn shall be computed and sent to the SW routine. Zero phase accumulations (i.e., Δn=0) is most desirable since it reduces complexity of the SW routine. For the setting Δn=0, NCO phase accumulator 335 (in NCO frequency generator 334—see
In some embodiments, bin selection 606 (see
Wherein CFO/(2π) is the estimated carrier frequency offset between a transmitter and the receiver and N is the number of FFT bins (e.g., 256).
In some embodiments, bin selection 606 (see
in which Freq_bits may be set to 14 or any other suitable number. Indices i1 and i2 are selected by finding the two FFT bins closest to 2CFO.
Equation 4 sets forth a definition for the sign operation.
In some embodiments, bin recording (at step 408, see
A CFO estimate is recorded at step 608 (shown in
In some embodiments, residual frequency error {circumflex over (ε)} estimation 610 (see
In some embodiments, residual frequency error compensation and time averaging may be computed in accordance with Equations 6, which depend on {circumflex over (ε)} and whose derivations are set forth in Appendix A.
Equations 7 may be used to evaluate an I/Q imbalance phasor estimate, which may be computed using Equation 8.
I/Q imbalance compensation parameters ξ,ρ and Scale_Q (see, e.g., Equation 1) may then be computed in accordance with Equation 9.
Equation 9 avoids saturation at the receiver since is always smaller or equal than unity, thus attenuating the stronger I/Q signal rather than amplifying the weaker I/Q signal. In some embodiments, the above computations can be carried out in an iterative fashion over several probe2 transmissions. Equations 10 show how new phasor estimates may be used to update previous estimates.
(
(
In Equations 10, (
Equations 12 set forth I/Q compensation parameters that may be used during the reception of the i′th probe2.
Three to four iterations (which may correspond to 3 to 4 probe2 transmissions) are often sufficient to compensate for I/Q imbalance.
Appendix C sets forth pseudo-code for a fixed point implementation of the compensation.
Appendix D sets forth parameters for a hardware-software interface in a system for I/Q imbalance compensation.
A network node may acquire an estimate of signal to noise ratio (“SNR”) at each tone and carrier frequency offset (relative to an associated network coordinator (“NC”)) when the node processes one or more probe 1 bursts from the NC. The node may use the SNR estimates to inform the NC which two frequency bins to use for probe2 transmission to the node. The node may use the CFO estimate to calculate and communicate to the NC the number of OFDM symbols and the cyclic prefix (“CP”) length during probe2 transmission.
Appendix E sets forth illustrative pseudocode for computation of frequency offset introduction, CP and selection of a number of OFDM symbols. In some embodiments, the Probe2, CP and L algorithms set forth in Appendix E may be performed before sending a MoCA™ probe2 report and after a receiver RF generator introduces any required, necessary or intentional carrier offset.
For the sake of clarity, the foregoing description, including specific examples of parameters or parameter values, is sometimes specific to certain protocols such as those identified with the name MoCA™ and/or Ethernet protocols. However, this is not intended to be limiting and the invention may be suitably generalized to other protocols and/or other packet protocols. The use of terms that may be specific to a particular protocol such as that identified by the name MoCA™ or Ethernet to describe a particular feature or embodiment is not intended to limit the scope of that feature or embodiment to that protocol specifically; instead the terms are used generally and are each intended to include parallel and similar terms defined under other protocols.
It will be appreciated that software components of the present invention including programs and data may, if desired, be implemented in ROM (read only memory) form, including CD-ROMs, EPROMs and EEPROMs, or may be stored in any other suitable computer-readable medium such as but not limited to discs of various kinds, cards of various kinds and RAMs. Components described herein as software may, alternatively, be implemented wholly or partly in hardware, if desired, using conventional techniques.
Thus, systems and methods for compensating for I/Q imbalance have been described. Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced using embodiments of the invention other than those described, which are presented for purposes of illustration rather than of limitation. The present invention is limited only by the claims which follow.
The I/Q imbalance can be modeled as a multiplicative gain factor applied on one of the I/Q components as well a relative phase difference. During probe2 reception MoCA specifies that a receiver must introduce a frequency error during RF down conversion we shall denote this shift as φ. The converted signal is given by:
zi[n]=si[n] cos(2πφn)−sq[n] sin(2πφn)+wi[n]
zq[n]=gsi[n] sin(2πφn−θ)+gsq[n] cos(2πφn−θ)+wq[n]
Some algebra shows that the above can be expressed as
z[n]=K1s[n]ej2πφn+K2s*[n]e9−j2πφn+w[n]
K1=½(1+ge−jθ)
K2=½(1−gejθ)
At the receiver I/Q compensation is performed the signal after I/Q compensation is given by:
z′[n]={real(K1s[n]ej2πφn+K2s*[n]e−j2πφn+w[n])}
+jξ{imag(K1s[n]ej2πφn+K2s*[n]e−j2πφn+w[n])}
+jρ{real(K1s[n]ej2πφn+K2s*[n]e−j2πφn+w[n])}
Assuming transmission of a single frequency at frequency bin k, after some algebra the compensated signal is given by
z′[n]={|h|cos(2πn(k/N+φ)+∠h)}
+jξ{g|h|sin(2πn(k/N+φ)+∠h−θ)}
+jρ{|h|cos(2πn(k/N+φ)+∠h)}+[wr[n]+j(ρ·wr[n]+ξ·wi[n])]
The signal over goes frequency compensation and then is transformed into the frequency domain via the FFT operation. After some algebra the frequency domain signals at bins k and −k are given by:
In a system without I/Q imbalance, the energy at the negative bin is zero. The energy at the negative bin due to I/Q imbalance is given by
Thus our target is to minimize the energy of bin −k by using ρ, ξ. Minimizing using the Lagrange multipliers method gives the following equations
2ξg2−2g cos θ−2ρg sin(θ)=0
2ρ−2ξg sin(θ)=0
Solving the above yields
It is easy to show that such a selection actually brings the energy at bin −k to 0 and thus completely cancels the I/Q imbalance effects. Our goal now is to estimate the I/Q imbalance parameters from probe2 transmissions.
I/Q Parameter Estimation
Since I/Q imbalance corrupts the incoming signal it results in corrupted carrier frequency estimation as well as corrupted channel estimation. The channel estimation under I/Q imbalance is given by;
The FFT output at bins k and −k without I/Q compensation but after frequency compensation assuming a frequency estimation error of ε is given by
Effects of Carrier Frequency Offset Greater than 50 Khz
In the absence of carrier frequency error the image component resulting from the I/Q imbalance appears exactly at the mirror digital frequency (−k/N) of the transmitted tone. Under carrier frequency error (which is mandatory during probe II) the I/Q image appears at a digital frequency of (−k/N−2φ), where φ is the normalized carrier frequency error which is φ=Carrier Frequency Error/SymbolRate=Δfc/fs. The carrier frequency error can be as large as ±200 ppm of 1.5e9 Hz=300 kkHz. While the OFDM tone spacing is 50e6/256=195.3 kHz. Thus the image component can fall somewhere between [−k−3, k+3] interval in the frequency domain. The FFT output for bin −k+i is given by
And so due to the fact that the compensated frequency error φ results in a shift of 2φ in the location of the image, we need to collect the image energy from the interval [−k−3, . . . , k+3]. Pragmatically since we know the frequency error φ (up to ε) we know that the image will appear at a digital frequency of
The loss of image energy in [dB] with respect to the image energy is a function of the number of bins used to collect energy and given by:
The worst case loss is experienced when the image falls midway between bins (r=1/(2N)). Using just one bin which is closest to the image results in a worst case loss of 3.9223[dB] using two bins results in a loss of 0.9120[dB]
We shall use 2 bins seems like a reasonable trade-off between complexity and performance.
FFT Processing of Probe2 (Single OFDM Symbol)
For simplicity consider a single OFDM symbol the extension to multi OFDM symbols will be given shortly after. We have shown that the FFT outputs at bins k and −k are given by
It is easy to show that each expression is composed of an expected signal term and an ICI term from the mirror frequency. We shall now show that the ICI terms are much smaller than the signal terms and can thus be neglected.
The ICI induced at bin k is due to the fact that the image signal that results from I/Q imbalance is produced at a digital frequency of −k/N−φ′ (where φ′=(φ−½ε)) which is not on the FFT grid. The further away this frequency is from the FFT grid of 1/N the larger the ICI. Since k is restricted to be in the interval {[146,186},[217,249]} the image is produced far away from the desired signal and the ICI noise it produces at frequency k/N is very small. To see this considers the ratio between the signal and ICI terms at bin k. We denote this ratio as the SNR between the desired and ICI terms and it is given by:
The worst case SNR is found by minimizing the above expression with respect to {g, θ, k, φ′}. It is easy to show that minimizing the above expression is separable and thus minimization is achieved by
It is easy to see (analytically as well) that the minimum is at the edges of the argument interval namely for g=0.5,2 and Teta=±10° and thus
b depicts the second term as a function of φ and k
From
Maximum is achieved for Df=±245 Khz and thus
Thus the worst case SNR induced by the ICI term is 40.3816[dB]
Thus the ICI term is at the worst case 40[dB] below the signal term and so can be neglected. A similar analysis can be performed for the negative bins. The FFT outputs at bins k and −k+i after neglecting the ICI terms is given by:
Since we cannot estimate the channel response h we cannot solve a linear LS problem for ge−jθ, instead we first solve a LS problem for the estimation of hK*2 from the two negative bins −k+i1 and −k+i2
Thus we can estimate
without knowledge of the channel h by
Since probe2 is composed of two tones one at k1 and the other at k2 we can average the result from these two tones and thus
It is easy to see that
And thus its estimate is given by
The I/Q compensation is then easily computed by
FFT Processing of Probe2 (Multi OFDM Symbol)
When looking at multiple OFDM symbols we need to take into account the phase error induced by the accumulation of the residual frequency error ε. It is easy to show that the phase of the m′th OFDM symbol relative to the first one is given by
Note that the above does not take into account the sampling frequency error its effect is assumed to be small and was neglected throughout the analysis.
The phase accumulated from the starting time of carrier frequency compensation to the start of the first FFT window should be accounted for. Since our algorithm computed the ratio between Zk and conj(Z−k) any constant phase term will not cancel out but on the contrary double itself.
Thus the FFT output at bins +k, −k+i for the m′th OFDM symbol is given by
Residual Carrier Frequency Estimation
To use the information from all L OFDM symbols we need to compensate for the residual frequency offset ε and then compute the average of the compensated signals form each bin to reduce the AWGN variance. Since ε can be large enough such that phase wrapping can occur several times during the L OFDM symbols we propose the following estimator which is immune to phase wrapping (as long as no more than one wrap occurs between two consecutive samples which is the case here).
Residual Frequency Estimation
The residual frequency error estimate may be computed by
The residual frequency error compensation and averaging is given by Residual Frequency Compensation and time averaging
The phasor ge−jθ can then be estimated using the same estimator derived above, namely
Where the phase term ej4π(φ-ε)(Δn) compensates for the initial phase error accumulated from the start time of frequency compensation till the start of the first FFT window. Simplification of the Coefficients Bi and A
For pragmatic implementation we need to simplify the expressions of Bi and A, simplification can be obtained by introducing some approximations. Let's look at
The residual frequency error is typically smaller then 10 khz (7 ppm) for such an error
Thus we make the following approximation
As for Bi
Since the frequency shift along with the residual frequency error is smaller than (200+7)ppm and −3≦i≦3 follows that the argument of the sin( ) in the denominator is small
For such a small angle a simple linear approximation has very little error
Thus follows that
And so the simplified coefficients are given by
A=N
Ideal Channel No AWGN with 200 ppm carrier & sampling frequency offset The following plots summarize simulation results for a 3[dB] amplitude imbalance, 10° phase imbalance, 200 ppm frequency offset, ideal channel and no AWGN. Before RX I/Q compensation routine is invoked the receiver SNR is around 10.1 [dB] as can be seen in the following
After processing of the first probe2, the SNR is around 33[dB]. In
After processing of the second Probe II, the SNR is around 39.6[dB]. In
After processing of the third Probe II, the SNR is around 40.6[dB], as shown in
The I/Q imbalance parameter estimation after each one of the four iterations is summarized in the following table
Channel MoCA10408, SNR AWGN 15[dB]
The following plots summarize simulation results for a 3[dB] amplitude imbalance, 10° phase imbalance, 200 ppm frequency offset, MoCA10408 channel and 15[dB] AWGN SNR.
Before RX I/Q compensation routine is invoked the receiver SNR is around 5.1 [dB] as can be seen in
After processing of the first Probe II, the SNR is around 9.5[dB]. In
After processing of the second Probe II, the SNR is around 11 [dB], as shown in
After processing of the third Probe II, the SNR is around 11.6[dB], as shown in
The SNR when no I/Q imbalance is present at the receiver is around 11.3[dB], as shown in
Decoupling of TX and RX I/Q Imbalance
The intentional frequency shift specified by MoCA results in the decoupling of the TX and RX imbalance parameters, to show that our algorithm can estimate the RX parameters in the presence of X imbalance we show simulation results for the following scenario
After three probe2 transmissions the SNR was around 21.2[dB], as shown in
The estimated RX I/Q imbalance parameters after 3 iterations were
Thus parameters were correctly estimated, for comparison the SNR in a scenario where only TX imbalance is present is around 21.2[dB].
Thus the proposed algorithm is robust in the presence of TX I/Q imbalance.
The following flow Pseudo code gives a fixed point implementation of the above algorithm. Note that complex variables have the letter “c” prepended.
Function 1: Probe2Processing
Function 2: Residual_Frequency_Estimation
Function 3: Scale_Complex—64
function [csphasor]=Scale_Complex—64(cfphasor—64, Nphasor_bits)
Ceil_Log 2_Abs_Real_Cfphasor—64=ceil_log 2(abs(real(cfphasor—64)));
Ceil_Log 2_Abs_Imag_Cfphasor—64=ceil_log 2(abs(imag(cfphasor—64)));
Scale=Nphasor_bits-max(Ceil_Log 2_Abs_Real_Cfphasor—64, Ceil_Log 2_Abs_Imag_Cfphasor—64);
if (Scale>=0)
csphasor—32=(cfphasor—64<<Scale);
else
csphasor—32=(cfphasor—64>>(−Scale));
end
csphasor=Cmplx_Saturate(csphasor—32, Nphasor_bits);
Function 4: ceil_log 2
Function: 5: Sign
Function 6: Cmplx_Saturate
Function 7: Cordic_SW
Function 8: Cordic_Pre_Process
Function 9: Residual_frequency_Compensation
Function: 10: Coeff Computation
Function 11: Phasor Estimation Variable Definition
Function 12: Compensation_Params_Estimation
Function 13: Compute_Fix_Point_IQ_Coeffs
Complex Math Operation Definitions
[C—32_r,C—32_i]=Cmplx_Add—16—16(A—16_r,A—16_i,B—16_r,B—16_i);
[C—32_r,C—32_i]=Cmplx_Add—32—32(A—32 r,A—32_i,B—32_r,B—32_i);
[R—32]=Real_Add—30—30_T(A—30,B—30);
[C—64_r,C—64_i]=Cmplx_Add—64—32(A—64 r,A—64 i,B—32 r,B—32_i);
[C—32_r,C—32_i]=Cmplx_Real_Add—32—16 (A—32_r,A—32_i,B—16);
[C—32_r,C—32_i]=Cmplx_imag_Add—32—16 (A—32_r,A—32_i,B—16);
[C—32_r]=MAG—2—16(A—16_r,A—16_i)
[C—64_r]=MAG—2—32(A—32_r,A—32_i)
[C—32_r,C—32_i]=Cmplx_Mult—16—16(A—16_r,A—16_i,B—16_r,B—16_i)
[C—64_r,C—64_i]=Cmplx_Mult—32—32(A—32_r,A—32_i,B—32_r,B—32_i)
[C—32_r,C—32_i]=Cmplx_real_Mult—16—16(A—16_r,A—16_i,B—16_r)
[C—64_r,C—64_i]=Cmplx_Mul—32—16(A—32_r,A—32_i,B—16_r)
[C—16_r,C—16_i]=Cmplx_real_div—32—16(A—32_r,A—32_i,B—16_r)
[C—32_r,C—32_i]=Cmplx_real_div—64—32(A—64_r,A—64_i,B—32_r)
[C—16_r,C—16_i]=Switch_real_imag(A—16_r,A—16_i);
C—32_i=A—16_r
The following table summarizes the information exchanged between the HW and SW during probe2 reception. Output refers to Output from the HW and Input refers to Input to the HW.
Tone Selection
CP & Number of OFDM Symbol Selection
This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/938,848, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR COMPENSATING FOR SIGNAL IMBALANCE IN A RECEIVER”, filed on Nov. 13, 2007, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,090,043, which is a nonprovisional of the following U.S. Provisional Applications, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties: U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/866,532, entitled, “PACKET AGGREGATION”, filed on Nov. 20, 2006, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/866,527, entitled, “RETRANSMISSION IN A COORDINATED HOME NETWORK”, filed on Nov. 20, 2006, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/866,519, entitled, “IQ IMBALANCING USING TWO-TONE TRANSMISSION IN MULTI-CARRIER RECEIVER”, filed on Nov. 20, 2006, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/907,111, “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATION OF PACKETS FOR TRANSMISSION THROUGH A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK”, filed on Mar. 21, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/907,126, entitled, “MAC TO PHY INTERFACE APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR TRANSMISSION OF PACKETS THROUGH A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK”, filed on Mar. 22, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/907,819, entitled, “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RETRANSMITTING PACKETS OVER A NETWORK OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS”, filed on Apr. 18, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/940,998, entitled “MOCA AGGREGATION”, filed on May 31, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3836888 | Boenke et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
4413229 | Grant | Nov 1983 | A |
4536875 | Kume et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4608685 | Jain et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4893326 | Duran et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5052029 | James et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5170415 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5343240 | Yu | Aug 1994 | A |
5421030 | Baran | May 1995 | A |
5440335 | Beveridge | Aug 1995 | A |
5570355 | Dail et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5638374 | Heath | Jun 1997 | A |
5671220 | Tonomura | Sep 1997 | A |
5796739 | Kim et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802173 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805591 | Naboulsi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805806 | McArthur | Sep 1998 | A |
5815662 | Ong | Sep 1998 | A |
5822677 | Peyrovian | Oct 1998 | A |
5822678 | Evanyk | Oct 1998 | A |
5845190 | Bushue et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850400 | Eames et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854887 | Kindell et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856975 | Rostoker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5877821 | Newlin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886732 | Humpleman | Mar 1999 | A |
5896556 | Moreland et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5917624 | Wagner | Jun 1999 | A |
5930493 | Ottesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963844 | Dail | Oct 1999 | A |
5982784 | Bell | Nov 1999 | A |
6009465 | Decker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6028860 | Laubach et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6055242 | Doshi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069588 | O'Neill, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6081519 | Petler | Jun 2000 | A |
6081533 | Laubach et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111911 | Sanderford, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118762 | Nomura et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6157645 | Shobatake | Dec 2000 | A |
6167120 | Kikinis | Dec 2000 | A |
6192070 | Poon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219409 | Smith et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229818 | Bell | May 2001 | B1 |
6243413 | Beukema | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6304552 | Chapman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307862 | Silverman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6434151 | Caves et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466651 | Dailey | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481013 | Dinwiddie et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6526070 | Bernath et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553568 | Fijolek et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563829 | Lyles et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6567654 | Coronel Arredondo et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611537 | Edens et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622304 | Carhart | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637030 | Klein | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650624 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6745392 | Basawapatna et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763032 | Rabenko et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785296 | Bell | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6816500 | Mannette et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6831899 | Roy | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836515 | Kay et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6859899 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862270 | Ho | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6877043 | Mallory et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6877166 | Roeck et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6898210 | Cheng et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6930989 | Jones, IV et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6940833 | Jonas et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950399 | Bushmitch et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961314 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985437 | Vogel | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7035270 | Moore, Jr. et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065779 | Crocker et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7089580 | Vogel et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7116685 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127734 | Amit | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133697 | Judd et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7142553 | Ojard et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7146632 | Miller | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149220 | Beukema et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7296083 | Barham et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7327754 | Mills et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7372853 | Sharma et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7460543 | Malik et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7487532 | Robertson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7532642 | Peacock | May 2009 | B1 |
7532693 | Narasimhan | May 2009 | B1 |
7555064 | Beadle | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574615 | Weng et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606256 | Vitebsky et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7652527 | Ido et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653164 | Lin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7664065 | Lu | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675970 | Nemiroff et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697522 | Kliger et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742495 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7782850 | Kliger et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783259 | Dessert et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7817642 | Ma et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7856048 | Smaini et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7860092 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7916756 | Atsumi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8090043 | Levi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8098770 | Shusterman | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8174999 | Kliger et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8184550 | Beck et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20010039660 | Vasilevsky et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010562 | Schleiss et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020059623 | Rodriguez et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059634 | Terry et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069417 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078247 | Lu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078249 | Lu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020085654 | Cvetkovic | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020097821 | Hebron et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105970 | Shvodian | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020136231 | Leatherbury et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141347 | Harp et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150155 | Florentin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166124 | Gurantz et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174423 | Fifield et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020194605 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030013453 | Lavaud et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016751 | Vetro et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022683 | Beckmann et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030060207 | Sugaya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063563 | Kowalski | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066082 | Kliger et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099253 | Kim | May 2003 | A1 |
20030152059 | Odman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169769 | Ho et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193619 | Farrand | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198244 | Ho et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040004934 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037366 | Crawford | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047284 | Eidson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066857 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107445 | Amit | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040163120 | Rabenko et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172658 | Rakib et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177381 | Kliger et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224715 | Rosenlof et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258062 | Narvaez | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050008092 | Kadous | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015703 | Terry et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050097196 | Wronski et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122895 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152350 | Sung et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152359 | Giesberts et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175027 | Miller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050204066 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2005 | A9 |
20050213405 | Stopler | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060059400 | Clark et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062250 | Payne, III | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078001 | Chandra et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104201 | Sundberg et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060256799 | Eng | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256818 | Shvodian et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268934 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280194 | Jang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025317 | Bolinth et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040947 | Koga | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070127373 | Ho et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160213 | Un et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171919 | Godman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183786 | Hinosugi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206551 | Moorti et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070217436 | Markley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253379 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286121 | Kolakowski et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080037487 | Li et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080037589 | Kliger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080369 | Sumioka et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080089268 | Kinder et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080178229 | Kliger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189431 | Hyslop et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212591 | Wu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225832 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080238016 | Chen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271094 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273591 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080279219 | Wu et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298241 | Ohana et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090063878 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090092154 | Malik et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106801 | Horii | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122901 | Choi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090165070 | McMullin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090252172 | Hare | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254794 | Malik et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257483 | French et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285212 | Chu et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296578 | Bernard et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316589 | Shafeeu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100031297 | Klein et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100080312 | Moffatt et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100150016 | Barr | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158013 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158015 | Wu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158021 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100158022 | Kliger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100162329 | Ford et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174824 | Aloni et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185731 | Wu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185759 | Wu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100238932 | Kliger et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100246586 | Ohana et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254278 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100254402 | Kliger et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281195 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284474 | Kliger et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100290461 | Kliger et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100322134 | Wu | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001833 | Grinkemeyer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110013633 | Klein et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110080850 | Klein et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110205891 | Kliger et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206042 | Tarrab et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110310907 | Klein et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1422043 | Jun 2003 | CN |
1588827 | Aug 2004 | CN |
0 385695 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 622926 | Nov 1994 | EP |
1501326 | Jan 2005 | EP |
60160231 | Aug 1985 | JP |
WO 9827748 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9831133 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9935753 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9946734 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0031725 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0055843 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0180030 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02019623 | Mar 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US03/27253 dated Dec. 30, 2003 (4 pgs). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US03/27254 dated Feb. 3, 2004 (5 pgs). |
“MoCA: Ubiquitous Multimedia Networking in the Home, Proc of SPIE vol. 6776 67760C-1”, Shlomo Ovadia, SPIE, Bellingham, WA, May 28, 2010. |
“MoCA Brewing Up Bigger Bandwidth, CTO Anton Monk Outlines Plans for MoCA 2.0 Home-Networking Specification” (http://www.multichannel.com/article/160878-MoCa—Brewing—Up—bigger—Bandwidth.php), Multichannel News, New York, NY, Dec. 15, 2008. |
“Home Networking on Coax for Video and Multimedia, Overview for IEEE 802.1AVB”, Shlomo Ovadia, San Ramon, California, May 30, 2007. |
“Microtune Introduces Industry's First 1-Ghz Cable Tuners Compatible with MoCA—Home Networking Standard”, Business Wire, San Francisco, California, Mar. 19, 2007. |
Ellingson, S.W., “Correcting I-Q Imbalance in Direct Conversion Receivers”, ElectroScience Laboratory, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, Feb. 10, 2003. |
Parot, Ron, et al., “Resolving and Correcting Gain and Phase Mismatch in Transmitters and Receivers for Wideband OFDM Systems,” in Pacific Groove, California on Nov. 3-6, 2002. |
European Search Report for European Patent application No. 07022243, Oct. 4, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120093244 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60866532 | Nov 2006 | US | |
60866527 | Nov 2006 | US | |
60866519 | Nov 2006 | US | |
60907111 | Mar 2007 | US | |
60907126 | Mar 2007 | US | |
60907819 | Apr 2007 | US | |
60940998 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11938848 | Nov 2007 | US |
Child | 13252385 | US |