This invention relates to machines and techniques for crimping textile threads and more particularly, although not necessarily exclusively, to such machines and techniques providing increased throughput while maintaining regularity of crimping.
Commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,074,016 to Meyer details a widely-used machine, known as a “stuffer box,” for crimping textile threads. Described as part of the machine are a compression chamber, a decompression chamber, and pivoting paddles defining an evacuation, or holding, chamber. Spring blocks or similar structures may bias the paddles to a normally-closed position, initially closing the outlet.
Textile thread introduced into the machine via drive pulleys (e.g. nip rolls) packs into the compression chamber, with the act of compression facilitating crimping of the threads. Additional thread forced into the machine drives crimped thread from the compression chamber into the decompression chamber, where the crimped thread is subjected to an atmosphere of hot steam (or other appropriate fluid). Subjecting the thread to vapor in this manner assists in fixing the crimps in the thread.
Thereafter, the fixed, crimped thread is forced into the evacuation chamber. Doing so counteracts force provided by the spring blocks so that the paddles open slightly. As the paddles open, thread may exit the machine for further processing or to be wound onto a winding machine or other device.
Machines detailed in the Meyer patent function well in use. Desirably, however, these machines could provide increased throughput of crimped threads. One possible way of increasing throughput is to increase the height of the machine, thereby increasing the volumes of the compression, decompression, and evacuation chambers. Increasing the volumes of the chambers obviously increases the amount of thread positionable in each chamber. Unfortunately, however, it also decreases the uniformity of the crimping, an undesirable result.
Another possible technique for increasing throughput is to expand the width of the machine. Enlarging the width of the stuffer box allows for relatively uniform crimping of the threads, thus avoiding the problem associated with increasing the height of the machine. Regrettably, though, a width increase mandates a corresponding resizing of the nip rolls. Such resizing exacerbates the ability of one thread to slide relative to another, producing different entry speeds of threads into the stuffer box. The different entry speeds in turn create exit difficulties associated with the threads and their subsequent winding.
The present invention provides an alternate manner of increasing throughput of machines such as (but not limited to) that of the Meyer patent. Rather than increasing the height or width of the stuffer box, the present invention reconfigures the nip rolls so as to group the threads in one (preferably central) region of the roll faces. This grouping reduces tendency of the threads to spread across the faces and slide relative to each other—or off the faces entirely—promoting uniformity of entry speed and correspondingly increasing throughput.
A presently-preferred version of the invention incorporates a circumferential groove in a central region of the face of at least one nip roll. The groove beneficially is concave in shape, although it need not necessarily be so. An eyelet or other thread-focusing means optionally may be provided upstream of the nip rolls. If such an eyelet is utilized, it preferably will have diameter less than or equal to the width of the groove.
It thus is an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide improved apparatus and methods for crimping textile threads.
It also is an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide crimping machines configured to allow greater thread throughput than generally commercially available.
It is another optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide greater thread throughput without changing the height or width of the stuffer box.
It is a further optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide machines in which at least one nip roll is grooved to group threads entering the machines.
It is, moreover, an optional, non-exclusive object of the present invention to provide an eyelet upstream of the grooved roll (or rolls) to condense the threads into the region defined by the groove (or grooves).
Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the appropriate field with reference to the remaining text and drawings of this application.
Illustrated in
As shown in
Also depicted in
The foregoing is provided for purposes of illustrating, explaining, and describing embodiments of the present invention. Modifications and adaptations to these embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. The contents of the Meyer patent are incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
497912 | Dodd | May 1893 | A |
634307 | Neidhardt | Oct 1899 | A |
679425 | Kertesz | Jul 1901 | A |
2187567 | Esselmann et al. | Jan 1940 | A |
2793418 | Pfau | May 1957 | A |
2820278 | Munch et al. | Jan 1958 | A |
3156016 | Dunlap et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3255507 | McCaskill | Jun 1966 | A |
3263298 | Holton | Aug 1966 | A |
3353239 | Heijnis | Nov 1967 | A |
3386142 | Stanley et al. | Jun 1968 | A |
3387349 | Trifunovic et al. | Jun 1968 | A |
3416772 | Sheehan | Dec 1968 | A |
3479710 | Turton et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3529045 | Rosenstein | Sep 1970 | A |
3588978 | Brafford | Jun 1971 | A |
3651630 | Gemeinhardt | Mar 1972 | A |
3672013 | Vernon et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3725985 | Yarber | Apr 1973 | A |
4301579 | Van den Hoven | Nov 1981 | A |
4558725 | Veneziale | Dec 1985 | A |
4796680 | Koba | Jan 1989 | A |
5074016 | Meyer | Dec 1991 | A |
5319831 | Takehara | Jun 1994 | A |
5455992 | Kurschatke et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5507226 | Burke et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6079087 | Cansler | Jun 2000 | A |
7325284 | Lane et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20050283958 | Sanderson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |