The present invention relates to the filtration of aluminum metal in a molten state, and more particularly, to filtration by porous filters, such as ceramic filters.
Ceramic filters, e.g., ceramic foam filters (CCFs) are known for use in filtering or removing contaminants from molten metal, e.g., aluminum metal and alloys. The use of such filters has associated limitations and challenges, such as, starting a flow of molten metal through the filter by displacing air in the internal pores/passageways in the filter (priming). Known methods for accomplishing this task include pre-heating the filter, establishing a sufficient head of molten metal above the filter to exert pressure to push the molten metal through the filter, applying a negative pressure on the downstream side of the filter by applying a vacuum on the downstream side, and agitating/driving the molten metal against and through the filter with an electromagnetic field which has a hydrodynamic effect on the molten metal. Notwithstanding, these known methods, alternative methods and apparatus for facilitating metal flow through a filter remain desirable.
The disclosed subject matter relates to a filter device having a receptacle for molten metal, the receptacle having an inlet through which the metal may enter the receptacle and an outlet through which the metal may exit the receptacle; a filter element within the receptacle positioned between the inlet and the outlet, the filter capable of passing molten metal there through; and a vibrator capable of inducing vibrations in the metal.
In another embodiment, the vibrator contacts a surface of the receptacle.
In another embodiment, the vibrator has a driven element that contacts the metal.
In another embodiment, the driven element is immersed in the metal.
In another embodiment, the device has an arm extending between the vibrator and the driven element.
In another embodiment, the arm is L-shaped.
In another embodiment, further including a support for the receptacle and wherein the arm is attached to the support.
In another embodiment, further including at least one resilient element interposed between the arm and the support enabling the arm to vibrate under the influence of the vibrator at least partially independently of the support.
In another embodiment, the vibrator is at least one of electrically, pneumatically or hydraulically driven.
In another embodiment, the vibrator generates a force with a direction between 45° to 90° relative to the direction of metal flow.
In another embodiment, the vibrator is mounted on an exterior surface of the receptacle proximate the filter element.
In another embodiment, further including a controller for the vibrator, the controller capable of adjusting the vibrator in at least one of frequency and amplitude.
In another embodiment, the receptacle has an inner liner that receives the metal and an outer shell.
In another embodiment, further including at least one resilient member interposed between the inner liner and the outer shell.
In another embodiment, the at least one resilient member at least partially isolates the vibration of the inner liner from the shell.
In another embodiment, the filter is a ceramic foam filter.
In another embodiment, the filter has >50 pores per inch.
In another embodiment, the filter has ≥60 pores per inch.
In another embodiment, the filter could be a bed filter, a porous tube or any known filtration media for molten metal.
In another embodiment, the molten metal includes aluminum.
In another embodiment, the driven element is at least partially covered by a refractory material.
In another embodiment, further including at least one additional vibrator, the vibrator and additional vibrator operable independently or simultaneously and at the same frequency or different frequencies.
In another embodiment, a method of priming a filter with pores for filtering molten metal, the filter disposed in a reservoir, includes the steps of pouring the molten metal into the reservoir onto the filter; and vibrating at least one of the molten metal, the filter or the reservoir to induce passage of the molten metal into pores of the filter, displacing air residing in the filter.
In another embodiment, a method of draining a filter with pores containing molten metal, includes the steps of: vibrating the filter containing the molten metal, inducing the metal in the pores of the filter to flow out.
In another embodiment, further including the step of draining the filter of molten metal and during at least part of the step of draining, simultaneously vibrating at least one of the molten metal, the filter or the reservoir inducing the metal in the pores of the filter to flow out.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure, reference is made to the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the processing of metals, it may be preferable to remove certain contaminants and inclusions. For example, in the case of aluminum and aluminum alloys, it may be desirable to remove oxides of aluminum and magnesium, borides, carbides, nitrides and spinels to promote a more pure metal product for various reasons. This contaminant removal has been performed by porous ceramic filters, e.g., ceramic foam filters (CFFs) through which a stream of molten metal is passed. As with filters generally, the smaller the pore size and the greater the thickness of the filter, the more effective the filtration process is in removing contaminants, but the more restrictive the filter is to flow. As applied to filtering liquid metal, ceramic filters exhibit a requirement to be primed, i.e., to initiate flow through the filter by displacing air present in the pores of the filter by liquid metal. Approaches for facilitating metal flow through ceramic filters include pre-heating the filter so the initial flow of metal is not solidified upon contacting the filter and creating a sufficient height (head) of molten metal above the filter to push the metal through the filter. Typically, there are limitations on the head of metal that may be established in a given metal handling facility, so alternative methods and apparatus have been used. For example, a low pressure may be established on the downstream side of the filter by vacuum apparatus, as disclosed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 7,666,248, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In another approach, an induction coil may be used to produce Lorentz forces that act on the metal and facilitate a flow of metal through the filter as disclosed in Canadian Patent Document No. CA 2,871,245, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present disclosure recognizes that vibratory mechanisms may also be used to facilitate passage of molten metal through a filter. More particularly, mechanical, electrical, electro-mechanical, air powered and/or hydraulic powered mechanisms may be utilized to establish a vibration of the filter, the container/receptacle through which the molten metal passes in proximity to the filter and/or the molten metal, to facilitate metal flow through the filter. The vibration may be in the nature of a wave, e.g., a compression/pressure wave, like an acoustic wave, in one embodiment, at an ultrasonic frequency, that is transmitted through the metal from a transducer/vibrator acting on the filter, the receptacle/conduit in communication with or proximate to the filter, or the molten metal. The use of a vibratory mechanism for this purpose may permit the passage of molten metal through filters that are finer than that which would normally be used. For example, in many traditional metal purification systems, filters finer than 50 pores per inch (PPI) are not useable. In accordance with the present disclosure, filters finer than 50 PPI or finer may be used, e.g., a filter of 50 PPI to 80 PPI.
A vibratory mechanism/technique of filtration in accordance with the present disclosure may be used to facilitate priming at the beginning of the cast to use the full surface of the filter, during filtration and/or after filtration of a batch of molten metal is concluded, e.g., to promote the removal of metal and/or trapped contaminants from the filter. In this later application, the removal of metal and contaminants from the filter may extend the useful life of the filter, e.g., for a bed filter, this technique may be used to extend the life and flush inclusions to continue with a refreshed bed. It may also reduce the amount of heating that would otherwise be needed for reestablishing a flow of molten metal through the filter in a subsequent filtration run. It should be appreciated that the vibratory mechanisms and methods of the present disclosure may be used independently of the known methods and apparatus used to prime filters and promote metal flow there through. Alternatively, the vibratory approach of the present disclosure may be used in conjunction with known methods. For example a vibratory apparatus may be used independently of or in conjunction with vacuum or magnetic induction assist type of filtration promoter.
In the embodiment shown, the arm 26 has a horizontally extending portion 26H providing a selected relative horizontal position of the vibrator assembly 22 relative to the receptacle 12, e.g., allowing the driven plate 28 to be centered in the receptacle 12 and a vertically extending portion 26V permitting the driven plate 28 to be extended down into the receptacle 12 to a selected height. As shown in
As shown in
In operation, the vibrator assembly 22 may be positioned at a selected height before or after molten metal M is directed into the receptacle 12 and secured in that position by clamp assembly 32. As shown in
The above described device 10 may be used to induce priming of a filter 34 at the beginning of a run or to induce clearance of metal and/or debris from a filter 34 at the end of a run. The vibrator 24 may be operated continuously during a run to increase the flow rate of molten metal M. In one embodiment, the frequency of vibration and/or the magnitude of the vibrations is adjustable by a controller 38 (
It should further be appreciated that while embodiments using a refractory liner, e.g., 12R have been described above, receptacles made from heat resistant metals, such as steel or cast iron could also be used without a refractory liner for forming a receptacle that receives molten metal and conducts it through a ceramic filter contained therein.
Experimental Testing
Lab Scale
The apparatus and methods described above were tested under the parameters listed below in Table 1. More particularly, a filter device 10 like that shown in
As can be appreciated from the above table, there is a correlation between the time to prime, whether vibration is used and the device used. More particularly, holding other parameters equal, i.e., ppi, alloy, temperature, pre-heating of filter, etc., and varying the presence of vibration and type of vibrator, one series of testing indicated that the time to prime 1) with no vibration was 22 seconds; 2) with vibrations from a jackhammer drill, 14 seconds; 3) with vibrations from a Vibco vibrator, 20 seconds; and 4) with vibrations from another air vibrator, 20 seconds. This testing indicates that vibration promotes quicker priming and that the jackhammer drill was the most effective vibrator.
As can be appreciated from Table 1, there is a correlation between the weight of the filter in grams/cm2, pre-heating of the filter and whether vibration is used. The filter is weighed after use and the weight includes the weight of the filter itself plus any residual metal that remains in the filter. The greater the weight, the better, the weight being an indication of the filter area/volume used. In a poor use of filter area, a small cross-sectional area or channel through the filter conducts the metal through the filter. More effective filtration conditions utilize more of the filter to pass metal, leading to greater throughput and better filtering due to the distribution of metal flow over the entire filter. Holding other parameters equal: ppi, alloy, temperature, pre-heating of filter, etc., and varying the filter preheating and vibration level between vibration and no vibration led to the following results: 1) filter cold, no vibration: 1594 g/cm2; 2) filter cold, with vibration: 1854 g/cm2; 3) filter pre-heated, no vibration: 1960 g/cm2. 4) filter pre-heated, vibration applied: 2162 g/cm2; This testing indicates that vibration promotes better distribution of metal flow through the filter, either with or without pre-heat relative to no vibration being applied.
As can be appreciated from Table 1, there is a correlation between the temperature of the metal, the presence of vibration and the time to prime, i.e., the greater the temperature, and the presence of vibration, the shorter the time to prime. Holding other parameters equal: ppi, alloy, etc., and varying the metal temperature and vibration level between vibration and no vibration led to the following results: 1) metal temp 720 C, no vibration, time to prime: 21 seconds; 2) metal temp 720 and above, no vibration, time to prime: 12 seconds; 3) metal temp 710 C, filter preheat, with vibration, time to prime: 12 seconds; 4) metal temp 710 C, filter cold, with vibration, time to prime: 17 seconds. This testing indicates that vibration promotes better distribution of metal flow through the filter, either with or without pre-heat relative to no vibration being applied.
Testing has revealed that there is a correlation between the weight of the filter when tested in g/cm2 and the location and orientation of the vibration source. More particularly, holding other parameters equal, i.e., ppi, alloy, temperature, pre-heating of filter, etc., and varying the orientation of the vibrator 24′ (
Testing has revealed that there is a correlation between the time to prime and the location and orientation of the vibration source. More particularly, holding other parameters equal, i.e., ppi, alloy, temperature, pre-heating of filter, etc., and varying the orientation of the vibrator 24′ (
The foregoing testing was repeated changing the ppi values of the filters between 30 ppi and 40 ppi and weighing the filters. The testing revealed: 1) a 30 ppi filter with no vibration resulted in a weight of 1,147 g/cm2; 2) a 30 ppi filter with vibrations from a jackhammer vibrator at 45° relative to the direction of metal flow resulted in a weight of 1,626 g/cm2; 3) a 30 ppi filter with vibrations from a vertical jackhammer vibrator resulted in a weight of 1,032 g/cm2; 4) a 40 ppi filter with vibrations from a jackhammer vibrator at 45° resulted in a weight of 1,273 g/cm2; 5) a 40 ppi filter with vibrations from a jackhammer vibrator at 90° resulted in a weight of 780 g/cm2; and 6) a 40 ppi filter with vibrations from a vertical jackhammer vibrator resulted in a weight of 1152 g/cm2. The foregoing tests indicate that the 45° orientation worked the best for both 30 and 40 ppi filters.
The foregoing testing was extended 50 to ppi filters resulting in the following results: 1) a 50 ppi filter with no vibration resulted in a weight of 1,642 g/cm2; 2) a 50 ppi filter with vibrations from a jackhammer vibrator at 45° relative to the direction of metal flow resulted in a weight of 1,837 g/cm2; 3) a 50 ppi filter with vibrations from a jackhammer vibrator at 90° resulted in a weight of 1670 g/cm2; 4) a 40 ppi filter with vibrations from a vertical jackhammer vibrator resulted in a weight of 1,518 g/cm2. The foregoing tests indicate that the 45° orientation worked the best for the 50 ppi filter.
The testing revealed that vibration had a positive impact on metal impregnation of the filter resulting in a 5% to 13% increase, depending on the filter. 30 ppi and 60 ppi filters had more than a 10% increase of metal impregnation with vibration. This beneficial effect is enhanced when the filter is preheated, showing an improvement in filter impregnation by metal of 13% for 50-60 ppi filters and a 24% increase for a 30 ppi filter.
A consideration of vibration vs. no vibration for a variety of filter sizes, all other factors the same, led to the following resulting filter weights: 1) 30 ppi, no vibration: 1651 g; 2) 30 ppi, with vibration: 1823 g; 3) 50 ppi, no vibration: 2076 g; 4) 50 ppi, with vibration: 2175 g; 5) 60 ppi, no vibration: 2027 g; and 6) 60 ppi, with vibration: 2289 g.
A consideration of vibration force orientation for a variety of filter sizes, all other factors the same, led to the following resulting filter weights: 1) 30 ppi, no vibration: 1709 g; 2) 30 ppi, with vibration using jack hammer drill at 45° relative to the direction of metal flow: 2126 g; 3) 50 ppi, no vibration: 2076 g; 4) 50 ppi, with vibration using jack hammer drill at 45°: 2337 g; 5) 60 ppi, no vibration: 2027 g; and 6) 60 ppi, with vibration using jack hammer drill at 45°: 2289 g.
A beneficial effect on time to prime was also observed with vibration of the filter. More particularly, a preheated 30 ppi filter time-to-prime without vibration was 30 seconds, with vibration, 15 seconds. A preheated 40 ppi filter took 13 seconds to prime with vibration. A preheated 50 ppi filter time to prime without vibration was 60 seconds, with vibration, 18 seconds. A preheated 60 ppi filter time to prime without vibration was 20 seconds, with vibration, 16 seconds. In each case, filter impregnation and time to prime were improved by vibration. For a given filter, (preheated, 30 ppi) the time to prime was 30 seconds, the same filter showed times to prime of 14 seconds when vibrated by a jackhammer drill at 45° relative to metal flow°, 13 seconds at 90° relative to metal flow and 20 seconds when at a vertical orientation, i.e. in the same direction as metal flow.
The cast alloys were also tested to determine the metal cleanliness with LiMCA (Liquid Metal Cleanliness Analyzer) and PoDFA (Porous Disk Filter Analysis from ABB Group new.abb.com and it was determined that the vibration assist in filtering did not disturb metal cleanliness, even though other parameters, such as time to prime, resultant filter weight, the ability to use finer filters and the removal of more inclusions were improved.
Full Scale Testing
Full scale testing was conducted at a casting facility that produced ingots of C17N, a pure alloy (1050 type) that is used, e.g., in litho applications, C42Z (5042) which contains 3.5% Mg and C52Z (5352), which contains 2.5% Mg. C52Z and C42Z may be used for can body applications. The cast alloys were tested to determine the metal cleanliness with LiMCA and PoDFA.
A minimum of two castings were produced per alloy to produce ingots 330 inches (minimum) in length. A maximum of three ingots could be casted at a time, which is consistent with the maximum flow rate specified (333-417 Kg/min) by the filter supplier for a 60 or 70 ppi filter that is 23×23 inches. Only 60 ppi and 70 ppi filters were used. LiMCA measurements were done on four castings. PoDFA were taken before and after a double CFF filter at 2000 mm and 4000 mm of the cast. LiMCa was taken continuously during the cast after the CFF with a special tube to minimize the effect of chlorides and bubbles at the furnace exit. Vibration of the filter was started prior to the molten metal encountering the filter and was stopped prior to casting 50 mm of the ingot. A temperature differential of about 100° C. between the bottom of the filter and top of the filter aids in filtration. Heating of the filter was done with a gas burner below and on top of the filter. A laser was used at the furnace exit after the filter to determine the metal head lost during casting. A pneumatic piston vibrator, viz., a Martin P-Series P4S vibrator from Martin Engineering of Neponset, Ill., www.martin-eng.com, was utilized as the vibrator. The vibration system was operated at 60-80 psi, producing about 1825 impacts per minute at a force of 2,105 lbs. per impact. The molten alloys were subjected to TAC (treatment of aluminum in crucible) to remove Na and Ca and alkalies. Filter weights were recorded.
The amount of time the vibrator was operated was varied to compensate for filter temperature variations to avoid casting abort due to filter clogging before 50 mm of ingot was cast. The vibration force was ramped during the starting process to cover all optimal directional G forces. Forces and corresponding pressures that resulted in resonance of the filter assembly were avoided. Resonance was observed at 30-40 psi. In this testing, maximum priming was achieved at 70 psi of air pressure to the vibrator.
The results of the full scale testing showed comparable results as in the laboratory scale testing, with an increase of 18% more metal in the filter for 60 and 70 ppi filters as a result of applying vibrations in accordance with the present disclosure. For example, standard casting processes without vibration yielded an average of 57.75 g/cm2. Upon application of vibration, the filters showed and average of 68.08 g/cm2 weight, corresponding to an 18% increase in weight. A comparison of total weights of preheated filters showed the following: 1) 30 ppi with no vibration: 1709 g; 2) 30 ppi with vibration, vibrator at 45°: 2126 g; 3) 50 ppi with no vibration: 2076 g; 4) 50 ppi with vibration, vibrator at 45°: 2337 g; 5) 60 ppi with no vibration: 2027 g; 6) 60 ppi with vibration, vibrator at 45°: 2289 g.
The foregoing vibratory techniques and apparatus have been explained independently, but each and all could be employed in combination. That is, more than one type of vibrator 24 may be utilized on a single filtering device 10 and may be operated simultaneously or in a sequence. In accordance with the present disclosure, a vibrator like, e.g., vibrators 24, 124A, may be retrofitted to an existing conduit or receptacle to improve filtration by a ceramic filter. It will be understood that the embodiments described herein are merely exemplary and that a person skilled in the art may make many variations and modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. For example, while the embodiments described above have related to the filtering of aluminum and its alloys, other metals and alloys could be amenable to filtration using the teachings of the present disclosure, such as die casting or iron casting. While a CCF ceramic filter is described above as the filtering medium, other types of filters could be employed in executing the apparatus and method disclosed in the present application, such as, bed filtration or porous tube filtration. While the vibrators described above may be used to produce a continuous vibration over a given period, a vibrator may also be employed to produce a single shock, generating a shock wave through at least one of the molten metal, the receptacle or the filter. All such variations and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/343,489, filed May 31, 2016, entitled, Apparatus and Methods For Filtering Metals, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5322546 | Holsgrove et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5673902 | Aubrey | Oct 1997 | A |
7666248 | Belley et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20060086435 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080053275 | Belley | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2871245 | Oct 2013 | CA |
1942266 | Apr 2007 | CN |
202410977 | Sep 2012 | CN |
202804092 | Sep 2012 | CN |
202576520 | Dec 2012 | CN |
202804092 | Mar 2013 | CN |
204198816 | Mar 2015 | CN |
3169226 | Mar 2001 | JP |
947210 | Jan 1982 | SU |
WO 2006110974 | Oct 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
SU 947210 machine translation (Year: 1982). |
CN 204198816 U machine translation (Year: 2015). |
CN 202804092 U machine translation (Year: 2013). |
CN 202576520 machine translation (Year: 2012). |
Family list of WO 9412301 A1 (Year: 1994). |
CN 202410977 U machine translation (Year: 2012). |
Family list of CN 1942266 A (Year: 2007). |
SU 947210 A1 human translation (Year: 1982). |
Breton, F. et al., Advanced Compact Filtration (ACF): An Efficient and Flexible Filtration Process, Light Metals 2013, (2013). |
Fritzsch, R. et al., Effect of Electromagnetic Fields on the Priming of High Grade Ceramicfoam Filters (CFF) with Liquid Aluminum, Light Metals 2013, (2015), pp. 929-935. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/IB2017/000781, dated Sep. 18, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170341140 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62343489 | May 2016 | US |