Silicon is one of the most widely used materials in modern photonics and is the main building block within the electronic complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process. However, silicon is also a centrosymmetric media, in which second order nonlinear susceptibility (χ(2)) is typically inhibited in the electric-dipole approximation. As a result, it can be challenging to induce nonlinear optical processes based on χ(2), such as second harmonic generation (SHG), sum frequency generation, difference frequency generation, and four wave mixing (e.g. linear electro-optic effects), in silicon devices.
The electro-refractive effect (also referred to as plasma-dispersion effect) based on the change in free-carrier concentration may be utilized to initiate certain electro-optic processes in silicon. As the free-carrier concentration changes in a silicon waveguide, the material polarization can also alter, thereby changing the electric permittivity of silicon. However, this electro-refractive effect is usually still weak (e.g., ΔnSi<10−3), compared to nonlinear crystals, such as LiNbO3.
One way to increase the electro-refractive effect in silicon is to integrate p-n junctions into compact resonant micro-ring and Mach-Zehnder modulators. By applying a positive or negative bias to these junctions, the free-carriers can be rapidly injected or depleted to modulate the permittivity of silicon. The modulation of the permittivity can in turn induce a phase change in a resonator cavity and an arm of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, leading to the amplitude modulation of a continuous wave laser at the output of a resonant and a Mach-Zehnder modulator, respectively. In injection based modulators, bandwidths of these modulators can be limited by the free-carrier lifetime in silicon (e.g., τ˜1 ns or 1/τ˜1 GHz), and the power consumption is typically on the order of a pico-joule-per-bit. The electrical bandwidths of the silicon modulators may be extended by depleting carriers (e.g., f3 dB>20 GHz) and power consumption of the modulation can be reduced down to a single femto-joule-per-bit. However, this improvement usually comes at a price of high free-carrier loss and large capacitance per-unit-volume. This can impose a trade-off between the device bandwidth and power consumption.
Alternatively, nonlinear electro-optic effects based on second and third order susceptibilities can scale with the applied electric field and usually do not impose a trade-off like the electro-refractive effect. In fact, the upper limit of the nonlinear electro-optic effect is imposed only by the silicon breakdown field which is Eb˜6×107V/m.
One approach for generating the electro-optic effect in silicon includes depositing a SiN stressor layer on a silicon waveguide to induce large stress gradients. Silicon waveguides formed using this method can have Pockel's like modulation up to about 500 KHz with an applied voltage of 30 Vpp for a <122 pm/V and second harmonic generation (P2ω/Pω=−73 dB) for a χ(2)˜44 pm/V. However, introduction of stressor SiN layer can add process complexity and limit the electro-optic design.
Another approach for generating electro-optic effect in silicon is converting the third order non-linear susceptibility χ(3) to second order non-linear susceptibility χ(2) by the external static or low frequency electric field. An external electric field can be applied to orient dipole moments in the direction of this field, breaking the crystalline symmetry. This effect, also referred as the “electro-optic DC Kerr effect” or “quadratic field effect”, can be conveniently generated in silicon, because silicon exhibits a large χ(3) compared to other CMOS compatible materials, such as SiN and SiO2. In addition, ion implantation can be used to form junctions in silicon, allowing concentration of large electrical fields within silicon and elimination of external electrodes. The field induced χ(2) can be observed in the form of second harmonic generation (SHG). However, SHG efficiency can be relatively low due to the lack of phase matching in silicon waveguides and losses at the operating wavelength.
Embodiments of the present invention include apparatus, systems, and methods of for generating nonlinear effects in centrosymmetric materials such as silicon. In one example, an apparatus includes a waveguide including a centrosymmetric material to guide at least one light beam. The waveguide includes a plurality of p-type regions comprising a p-type material on a first side of the waveguide and a plurality of n-type regions comprising an n-type material on a second side, opposite the first side, of the waveguide. The apparatus also includes a first electrode in electrical communication with the plurality of p-type regions and a second electrode, in electrical communication with the plurality of n-type regions. The two electrodes apply a voltage between the first electrode and the second electrode so as to increase a second order susceptibility of the centrosymmetric material.
In another example, a method includes guiding at least one light beam in a waveguide formed of centrosymmetric material. The waveguide includes a plurality of p-type regions comprising a p-type material on a first side of the waveguide and a plurality of n-type regions comprising an n-type material on a second side, opposite the first side, of the waveguide. The method also includes applying a voltage between the plurality of p-type regions and the plurality of n-type regions to increase a second order susceptibility of the centrosymmetric material.
In yet another example, an apparatus includes a light source to emit a pump beam having a first frequency ω and a first wave vector kω. A silicon waveguide is in optical communication with the light source to guide the pump beam. The silicon waveguide includes a plurality of p-type regions arrayed at a period Λ on a first side of the silicon waveguide and a plurality of n-type regions arrayed at a period Λ on a second side, opposite the first side, of the silicon waveguide so as to form a plurality of PIN junctions with the silicon waveguide. The apparatus also includes a first electrode in electrical communication with the plurality of p-type regions and a second electrode, in electrical communication with the plurality of n-type regions, to apply a voltage to the plurality of PIN junctions, the voltage increasing a second order susceptibility of the silicon waveguide.
It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. It should also be appreciated that terminology explicitly employed herein that also may appear in any disclosure incorporated by reference should be accorded a meaning most consistent with the particular concepts disclosed herein.
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings primarily are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; in some instances, various aspects of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may be shown exaggerated or enlarged in the drawings to facilitate an understanding of different features. In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to like features (e.g., functionally similar and/or structurally similar elements).
Apparatus for Nonlinear Optical Effects in Centrosymmetric Materials
To increase the efficiency of nonlinear effects based on second order susceptibility in centrosymmetric materials, apparatus, systems, and methods described herein employ periodic electrical fields applied over a waveguide to induce nonlinear electro-optic (DC Kerr, second harmonic generation, sum frequency generation, difference frequency generation) effect with phase matching. The waveguide is implanted with ions to form compact p-i-n junctions, which concentrate electric fields to convert the third order susceptibility χ(3) into the second order susceptibility χ(2). The periodic electrical fields concentrated by the p-i-n junctions effectively create a wave vector, which together with the wave vectors of optical beams in the waveguide achieve phase matching. As a result, the efficiency of nonlinear effects, such as second harmonic generation, sum frequency generation, difference frequency generation, and four wave mixing, can be significantly enhanced.
The array of n-type regions 120 are connected to a first electrode 125 and the array of p-type regions 130 are connected to a second electrode 135. The connection between the n-type regions 120 and the first electrode 125 can be achieved via an n+ region 122 (see
In operation, the waveguide core 115 receives and guides a light beam 101 provided by a light source 150, such as a laser integrated onto the substrate 140. The voltage source 160 supplies a voltage and accordingly an electrical field between the array of n-type regions 120 and the array of p-type regions 130. The PIN junctions formed by the array of n-type regions 120, the array of p-type regions 130, and the waveguide core 115 can significantly enhance the electrical field within the waveguide core 115, thereby increasing the second order susceptibility of the centrosymmetric material in the waveguide core 115. The increased second order susceptibility of the centrosymmetric material, in turn, can induce various types of optical nonlinear effects in the waveguide 110, such as phase shifting, second harmonic generation, sum frequency generation, difference frequency generation, and four wave mixing, among others.
In addition to enhancing electrical fields in the waveguide core 115, the PIN junctions formed by the array of n-type regions 120, the array of p-type regions 130, and the waveguide core 115 also introduce a wave vector kPIN that can satisfy phase matching conditions of nonlinear optical effects. Without being bound by any particular theory or mode of operation, the wave vector kPIN of the electrical field in the waveguide core 115 depends on the period (also referred to as the pitch or periodicity) of the array of p-type regions 130 and the n-type regions 130 and can be written as kPIN=2π/Λ. Therefore, by tuning the period of the array of n-type regions 120 and the p-type regions 130, different wave vectors can be generated to satisfy phase matching conditions of different nonlinear optical effects.
In general, the period Λ of the n-type regions 120 and the p-type regions 130 (also collectively referred to as the doped regions 120 and 130) can be selected based on the wave vectors of light beams participating in the nonlinear optical effects. For example, as shown in
In practice, the period Λ can be about 100 nm to about 10 mm (e.g., about 100 nm, about 200 nm, about 500 nm, about 1 μm, about 2 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 20 μm, about 50 μm, about 100 μm, about 200 μm, about 500 μm, about 1 mm, about 2 mm, about 5 mm, or about 10 mm, including any values and sub ranges in between).
The apparatus 100 can be configured to generated and/or enhance nonlinear optical effects in various types of centrosymmetric materials. In one example, the waveguide core 115 can include silicon (e.g., intrinsic silicon). In this case, the p-type regions 130 can include silicon doped with a p-type dopant, such as boron, aluminium, nitrogen, gallium, indium, or any other p-type dopant known in the art. The n-type regions 120 can include silicon doped with an n-type dopant, such as phosphorous, arsenic, antimony, bismuth, lithium, or any other n-type dopant known in the art.
In another example, the waveguide core 115 can include germanium. In yet another example, the waveguide core 115 can include diamond. In yet another example, the waveguide core 115 can include silicon nitride, such as SiN. In yet another example, the waveguide core 115 can include silicon oxide, such as SiO2.
In one example, the n-type regions 120 and the p-type regions 130 are part of the waveguide 110. In this case, the waveguide core 115 can be made of an intrinsic semiconductor material (e.g., silicon), whereas the doped regions 120 and 130 include the same intrinsic semiconductor material doped with a corresponding type of dopant (n-type and p-type respectively). The PIN junctions formed by the doped regions 120 and 130 and the waveguide core 115 can be homojunctions.
In another example the doped regions (120 and 130) and the waveguide 110 can be separate components. For example, the waveguide core 115 can be fabricated from one material, while the doped portions 120 and 130 can be fabricated from another material doped with corresponding dopants. In this case, the PIN junctions formed by the doped regions 120 and 130 and the waveguide core 115 can be heterojunctions. In either example, the dopant concentration in the doped regions 120 and 130 can be about 1015/cm3 to about 1020 cm3 (e.g., about 1015/cm3, about 1016/cm3, about 1017/cm3, about 1018/cm3, 1019/cm3, or about 1020/cm3, including any values and sub ranges in between).
The dimensions of the waveguide core 115 can depend on the desired operating wavelength of the apparatus 100. In one example, the operating wavelength of the apparatus 100 can be the wavelength of the light beam 101. In another example, the operating wavelength of the apparatus 100 can be the wavelength of the second harmonic beam 102. In yet another example, the apparatus 100 can have more than operating wavelength (e.g., the wavelengths of both the first beam 101 and the second beam 102).
In one example, the waveguide core 115 can be configured as a single-mode waveguide for the light beam 101 and/or the second harmonic beam 102. In another example, the waveguide core 115 can be configured as a multi-mode waveguide for the light beam 101 and/or the second harmonic beam 102.
The height of the waveguide core 115 can be about 50 nm to about 20 μm (e.g., about 50 nm, about 10 nm, about 200 nm, about 500 nm, about 1 μm, about 2 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 15 μm, or about 20 μm, including any values and sub ranges in between). The width of the waveguide core 115 can also be about 50 nm to about 20 μm (e.g., about 50 nm, about 10 nm, about 200 nm, about 500 nm, about 1 μm, about 2 μm, about 5 μm, about 10 μm, about 15 μm, or about 20 μm, including any values and sub ranges in between).
In one example, the height (or thickness) of the doped regions 120 and 130 can be less than the height of the waveguide core 115 (as shown in
The length of the doped regions 120 and 130, defined as the distance between the waveguide core 115 and the respective electrode 125 and 135, can be about 5 nm to 5 μm (e.g., about 5 nm, about 10 nm, about 20 nm, about 50 nm, about 100 nm, about 200 nm, about 500 nm, about 1 μm, about 2 μm, about 3 μm, about 4 μm, or about 5 μm, including any values and sub ranges in between).
In one example, the light source 150 is optional and users of the apparatus 100 can provide their own light source to deliver the light beam 101. In another example, the light source 150 can be part of the apparatus 150. For example, the light source 150 can be a semiconductor laser fabricated on or in the substrate 140 such that the entire apparatus 100 can be compact and portable.
In one example, the light source 150 can be a continuous wave (CW) light source and the light beam 101 is accordingly a CW light beam. In another example, the light source 150 can be pulsed mode light source and the light beam 101 accordingly includes a train of light pulses. Examples of light sources that can be used include, but not limited to, gas lasers (e.g., HeNe laser, Argon laser, etc.), solid state lasers (Nd:YAG laser, Ti:sapphire laser, etc.), semiconductor laser (GaN laser, InGaN laser, InGaAsP laser, etc.), quantum cascade lasers, fiber laser (e.g., Yb glass fiber lasers), light emitting diodes (LEDs), organic light emitted diodes (OLEDs), or any other light source that is appropriate.
The wavelength of the light beam 101 can be about 0.6 μm to about 20 μm (e.g., about 0.6 μm, 0.7 μm, about 0.8 μm, about 0.9 μm, about 1 μm, about 2 μm, about 3 μm, about 4 μm, about 5 μm, about 7.5 μm, about 10 μm, about 15 μm, or about 20 μm, including any values and sub ranges in between). The wavelength of the second harmonic beam 102 accordingly is half the wavelength of the light beam 101.
The voltage source 160 can include any type of voltage sources known in the art. The voltage applied between the electrodes 125 and 135 can be about 1V to about 25 V (e.g., about 1 V, about 2 V, about 5 V, about 10 V, about 15 V, about 20 V, or about 25 V, including any values and sub ranges in between).
Quasi-phase matching between the backward beam 302 and the forward beam 303 can be written as kωb+kωf−2Δk=0, where kωb is the wave vector of the backward beam 302 in the waveguide 310 and kωf is the wave vector of the forward beam 303. To satisfy this phase matching condition, the period of the n-type regions 320 and the p-type regions 330 can be set as Λ=π/Δk. The reflection strength of the apparatus 300 can be controlled by the applied DC bias voltage.
The apparatus 300 can also be configured as a wave plate (also referred to as a polarization rotator) to rotate the polarization of the light beam 301. In this case, the phase matching condition of the wave plate can be written as: kTEω+kTMω−2Δk=0, where kTEω is the wave vector of the TE mode in the waveguide 310 and kTMω is the wave vector of the TM mode in the waveguide 310. Accordingly, the period of the n-type regions 320 and the p-type regions 330 can be set as Λ=π/Δk. Nonlinear polarization rotation is commonly used for as a mechanism for mode locking, and the voltage controlled polarization rotation in the apparatus 300 can be employed to control threshold and mode locking laser repetition rate for adaptive mode locking.
The apparatus 400 can also be configured as a sum frequency generator by changing the period Λ of the n-type regions 420 and the p-type regions 430. In this case, the third frequency ω3 is ω3=ω1+ω2 and the wave vector of the third beam 403 is kω3. The period Λ can be set as Λ=2π/((kω1+kω2)−kω3).
The apparatus 400 can also be configured as a frequency shifter. In this case, a voltage source (now shown in
Including more than one sub array of doped regions 520 and 530 can satisfy multiple phase matching conditions in a single device. For example, the apparatus 500 can be configured for broadband second harmonic generation. The input beam 510 can be a broadband light beam. Three different periods Λ1 to Λ3 can therefore satisfy three different phase matching conditions, thereby generating a second harmonic beam 502 including three spectral components at three different wavelengths. Alternatively, the input beam 510 can include three beams at three different wavelengths and the apparatus 500 can generate three second harmonic beams 502 from each of the input beams simultaneously.
In one example, the apparatus 500 can include multiple sub arrays having a chirped period Λ(x)=Λave+Λpk-pk|sin(2πx/L)|, where x is the longitudinal location of the doped region 520/530, Λ(x) is the period of the sub array at location x, L is the total length of the doped regions 520 and 530, Λave is the average period of all sub arrays in the doped regions 520 and 530, Λpk-pk is amplitude of the period variation. This chirped period can help generate more uniform distribution of second harmonic power within the waveguide 510. In another example, the apparatus 500 can include multiple sub arrays having a linearly chirped period Λ(x)=Λave+Λincx/L, where Λinc is the increment of period over the distance x.
The alternating configuration of doped regions on each side of the waveguide core 715 can create electrical fields in alternating directions along the length of the waveguide core 715. In other words, electrical fields between adjacent doped regions have opposite directions. For example, the electrical field between 720a and 730a is from top to bottom, while the electrical field between 720b and 730b is from bottom to top as indicated by arrows illustrated in
In one example, the electrodes 822 and 832 are arranged in a uniformly periodic pattern (i.e., having one period). In another example, the electrodes 822 and 832 are arranged in a chirped pattern (e.g., the chirped pattern described above with reference to
Methods of Generating and Enhancing Nonlinear Optical Effects
With enhanced second order susceptibility, the method 1100 can include several options to utilize the nonlinearity of the waveguide. In general, step 1110 includes guiding a first light beam at a first frequency ω1 and having a first wave vector kω1 in the waveguide. Step 1110 also includes guiding a second light beam at a second frequency ω2 and having a second wave vector kω2 in the waveguide. The period Λ is based on the first wave vector kω1 of the first light beam and the second wave vector kω2 of the second light beam.
In one example, the method 1100 can include second harmonic generation at step 1130. In this example, the second frequency ω2=2ω1 and the period Λ can be set as Λ=2π/(2kω1−kω2) to satisfy phase matching conditions for second harmonic generation.
In another example, the method 1100 can include difference frequency generation at step 1140, at which a third light beam is generated from the first light beam and the second light beam. The third beam has a third frequency ω3=(ω1−ω2) and a third wave vector kω3 in the waveguide. The period Λ can be set as Λ=2π/((kω1+kω2)−kω3) to satisfy phase matching conditions.
In yet another example, the method 1100 can include sum frequency generation at step 1150, at which a third light beam is generated from the first light beam and the second light beam. The third beam has a third frequency ω3=(ω1+ω2) and a third wave vector kω3 in the waveguide. The period Λ can be set as Λ=2π/((kω1+kω2)−kω3) to satisfy phase matching conditions.
Theoretical Analysis of the DC Kerr Effects
As described above, an applied DC electric field across a silicon waveguide can orient electric dipoles and break the crystalline symmetry within silicon. The broken crystalline symmetry can induce second order nonlinearity, which can be used for second harmonic generation and/or altering the electric permittivity.
Without being bound by any particular theory or mode of operation, the electric field induced second harmonic generation (EFISHG) can be a four-wave mixing process involving two fundamental optical fields (Eω), a DC field (EDC), and an output harmonic optical field (E2ω) in the form of χ(3)(2ω;ω,ω, 0). However, phase-matching between the fundamental and harmonic fields can be a challenge for efficient harmonic generation. In contrast, a field induced permittivity change, also referred as the “electro-optic DC-Kerr effect” or “quadratic field effect”, can be conveniently characterized as a phase-matched four-wave mixing process, since two of each DC and optical fields (EDC, Eω) are involved in the form of χ(3)(ω; ω, 0, 0) (see
where ε0, εSi and Δεe-r are the permittivity of vacuum, the permittivity of silicon, and electro-refractive relative permittivity, respectively.
In Equation (1), the DC Kerr nonlinearity can induce a relative permittivity according to the χ(3)ijkl tensor and the applied DC field. Crystalline silicon belongs to the m3m point-symmetry group and exhibit two independent tensor components, and χ(3)xxxx. Therefore, the DC Kerr permittivities (Δεx, Δεy, Δεz) can be derived and related to the second order nonlinearities as:
The diagonal component of this tensor can be χ(3)xxxx=6.95×10−19 m2/V2 and the off-diagonal component can be determined to be χ(3)xxyy=1.77×10−19 m2/V2 at χ˜1.55 μm.
In a silicon waveguide with an integrated vertical p-n junction, the electric field can be generated primarily in the y direction (EDC
In this analysis, the transverse-magnetic (TM11) polarized field can be aligned with the (1 0 0) crystalline axis, EDC
The effective permittivity perturbation that acts upon the propagation constant can be estimated by calculating the overlap between nonlinear electric permittivity and optical mode profile over the silicon cross-section (v0):
The exact solution can be calculated using the overlap integral discussed in details below. For simplicity, a flattop distribution of the optical mode within the silicon core can be assumed. This assumption simplifies the relative nonlinear permittivity to:
where H is the silicon core thickness. The effective second order nonlinearity can be calculated using Equation (2) and the tensor relationship:
In contrast to the DC Kerr effect, the electro-refractive effect is related to the change in carrier concentration rather than the electric field itself. This change in carrier concentration occurs usually at the edges of the depletion width (Δwd, see
Δn=ΛA,DNA,DB
The curve fitting parameters for donor (D) and acceptor (A) free-carriers can be: AD=−2.37×10−23, BD=1.08, CD=4.92×10−26, DD=1.2 and, AA=−3.93×10−18, BA=0.772, CA=1.96×10−24, and DA=1.1. Similar to the DC Kerr effect, the effective permittivity perturbation can be estimated via the calculation of the overlap between electro-refractive permittivity and optical mode profile over the silicon cross-section:
where the electro-refractive permittivity is calculated using the identity, Δε=(n+Δn)2−n2≈2nΔn. Although the exact solution can be calculated using the overlap integral in the following sections, a flattop distribution of the optical mode within the silicon core can be assumed. In addition, the fitting parameters can be: CA=CD, BA=BD=1, A=AA=AD and NA=ND=N, for the sake of simplicity. The relative permittivity is then simplified to Eq. (8).
The relative electro-refractive permittivities for TE and TM polarizations and three doping concentrations are plotted until the breakdown voltage in
Given that the changes in permittivity are known and the sign of both effects are same, the nonlinear and electro-refractive phase shifts in a Mach-Zehnder arm are determined by the following equation:
where L is the length of the Mach-Zehnder arm and nSi is the refractive index of silicon. For a cylindrical resonator, the frequency shift of a resonant mode (ωm) due to the nonlinear index perturbation can be derived from the Poynting's theorem:
Note that the nonlinear phase and frequency shifts scale with V3/2B in a p-n junction. Indeed, the DC Kerr effect based modulators can operate with low voltage swings on top of a large DC bias voltage to achieve large extinction ratios. This can also decrease free carrier losses, device capacitance, and power consumption. The electrical bandwidth can also be increased. In comparison, the electro-refractive phase and frequency shifts scale with VB in a p-n junction. Therefore, the frequency/phase shifts follow the electro-refractive effect at low bias voltages and follow the DC Kerr effect at large bias voltages in a silicon p-n junction. Although the discussion above is concentrated on the vertical junction case, it can be extended for any arbitrary junction profile using the nonlinear tensor.
Characterizations of Devices Based on DC Kerr Effects
To verify the enhancement of second order susceptibility based on DC Kerr effects, various devices are characterized in this section. Parameters and fabrication methods are described with reference to each figure presenting the characterization results.
A Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) substantially similar to the interferometer 1000 illustrated in
The vertical junction microdisk resonator and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (see, e.g.,
The vertical abrupt p-n junction, which can be centered at about 110 nm thickness, can be formed from arsenic (As) and boron difluoride (BF2) implants with target concentrations of, for example, about 1018/cm3. The n+ and p+ doped regions can be formed by phosphorus and BF2 implants with target concentrations of, for example, greater than 1020/cm3. The aluminum electrodes (also referred to as vias) can be connected to highly doped regions by self-aligned silicidation. Two copper routing layers can be used to contact inside the circular contact of the microdisk. These two copper layers are used to contact to on-chip ground-signal-ground (GSG) probing pads (60 μm×60 μm) at a 100 μm pitch.
The spectral response of the vertical junction microdisk resonator can be measured by exciting the fundamental TE-mode and TM-mode of the bus waveguide and the resonator (e.g, suing Agilent 81600B tunable laser source). The on-chip laser power can be calibrated and kept below −20 dBm to eliminate optically induced nonlinearities. The spectral scans at applied DC voltages spanning 0 to 5V (reverse bias) reveal the extinction ratios and frequency shifts for TE and TM polarizations (see
The frequency shifts for TE and TM excitation can be measured off each resonance dip (see
The spectral response of the 2 mm long vertical junction Mach-Zehnder arm can be measured from the bar and cross outputs of the interferometer. The fundamental TE-mode and TM-mode of the bus and ridge waveguide (see,
The spectral scans at applied DC voltages to a Mach-Zehnder arm spanning 0 to 6V (reverse bias) reveals the phase shifts, measured at λ=1550 nm, and Vπ for TE and TM polarizations (see,
The nonlinear DC Kerr, electrorefractive and total phase shifts are also calculated for both TE and TM polarizations using Equation (9) and the mode profiles shown in
The TM polarization exhibits relatively low optical bandwidth, limiting the on-chip adiabatic couplers. For 0 V and 6 V, the phase shifts from the electro-refractive and the DC Kerr effect are π and 0.66π (corresponding to χ(2)xxyeff=5.0 pm/V) for TE polarization, respectively. At the same voltage, the phase shifts from the electro-refractive and the DC Kerr effect are 0.32n and 0.9n (corresponding to χ(2)xxxeff=10 pm/V) for TM polarization, respectively.
Further characterization of the Mach-Zhender Interferometer is shown in
Two silicon ridge waveguides with embedded p-i-n junctions (see, e.g.,
The large intrinsic regions can facilitate observation of a relatively large DC Kerr effect and reduce the relative electro-refractive permittivity change due to the plasma-dispersion effect. The fundamental TE mode can be selected for maximal confinement and propagation can be chosen to be in the z direction. The optical mode profile eωx can be simulated using a finite difference mode solver. The x, y, and z directions are aligned with the (0 1 0), (0 0 1), and (1 0 0) crystalline axes of the silicon wafer. The generated electric field is aligned with x direction (i.e., EDCy=EDCz=0) for utilizing the diagonal (largest) tensor elements in the third order nonlinear susceptibility of silicon, χxxxx(3)=2.45×10−19 m2V−2 at λ˜1.55 μm. This is realized with the lateral p-i-n junction.
The DC Kerr index perturbations for both intrinsic regions can be simulated as a function of bias voltage, as shown in
The silicon and SiO2 refractive indices for pump and signal wavelengths can be determined using the fit parameters to the Sellmeier's equation. The carrier distribution within the silicon ridge waveguide can be simulated using Synopsys's Sentaurus Process and Device. The carrier distribution can be converted to electro-refractive index distribution using the fit parameters for plasma-dispersion effect. These fit parameters are extracted at λer˜1.55 μm. The electro-refractive index distributions at pump and signal wavelength can be scaled by (λω/λer)2 and (λ2ω/λer)2, following the plasma-dispersion relation. The refractive indices and electro-refractive index distributions at pump and signal wavelengths can be combined, respectively. The mode profiles and complex propagation constants for the resulting index distributions can be simulated using a finite-difference mode solver. The loss coefficients at pump and signal wavelengths can be extracted from the imaginary part of the complex propagation constants.
Using Equation (1), the DC Kerr relative permittivity is expressed as:
Δed.c. Kerr=12χxxxx(3)EDCx
where the electric field is EDCx=VDC/wi and VDC is the reverse bias. Assuming a small perturbation to the refractive index, the index perturbation can be approximated with ΔnDC Kerr=ΔεDC Kerr/2√{square root over (εSi)}. The overlap integral between the intrinsic region and the optical mode can be used to determine the effective DC Kerr index perturbation, Δneff=∫vΔnd.c. Kerreωxeωx* dv, where the optical mode (eωx) was normalized using ∫veωxeωx*dv=1.
The silicon ridge waveguides are placed in MZIs as optical phase shifters for characterizing DC Kerr relative permittivity. MZIs with a 4.5 mm long phase shifter with wi1 and 3-to-4 mm long phase shifters with wi2 can be fabricated on a 300 mm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer. The laser power is split into two arms with a broadband silicon 3 dB coupler. The optical path difference between the Mach-Zehnder (MZ) arms can be minimized with a silicon heater in one of the MZ arms and the output of the MZ arms are interfered using the silicon 3 dB coupler. Then, the outputs of the bar and cross ports of the MZIs can be recorded as a function of applied voltages to a single arm of the MZIs (see
The other arm of the MZI can also be doped for reducing loss difference between the MZ arms. The insertion losses due to the fiber couplers can be subtracted. The power difference between the cross and bar ports can be normalized and fitted with cos(2πΔn(vDC)L/λ), where L is the Mach-Zehnder arm length and Δn(vDC) is the induced refractive index as a function of applied voltage, plotted in
The observed relationship between refractive index change and voltage is substantially quadratic and pseudo-linear for intrinsic region widths wi1 and wi2, respectively. In these waveguides, the plasma-dispersion effect is expected to be small due to the large intrinsic regions. Further, the plasma-dispersion effect is expected to follow a dependence close to the square root of the applied voltage due to the voltage dependence of the intrinsic region width. However, this is not observed due to the contribution from the DC Kerr effect. The plasma-dispersion effect in the waveguide with an intrinsic region of wi2 can contribute to the change in refractive index two times less than the DC Kerr effect for large electric fields, and is negligible in the waveguide with the larger intrinsic region of wi1.
Furthermore, the loss change over 20 V is measured to be 0.9±0.2 dB-per-cm for a straight waveguide (see
There are multiple potential advantages of DC Kerr effect based silicon MZI modulators compared to plasma-dispersion effect based MZI modulators. First, the plasma-dispersion effect can alter the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index as a function of voltage. This can in turn induce a large loss change as a function of voltage during modulation and introduce amplitude chirp.
Second, since the waveguide core of a plasma-dispersion effect based modulator is doped, there can be insertion loss in the modulator. An injection based modulator bandwidth can be limited by free-carrier lifetime (about 1 ns) and a depletion based modulator bandwidth can be limited by the intrinsic cross-section RC time constant. To increase the electro-optic response in depletion based modulators, a large capacitance p-n junction is usually used, thereby limiting the bandwidth. In contrast, the DC Kerr effect has a low capacitance p-i-n junction. When these limitations are removed, complex modulation formats, coherent communications, RF links and electro-optic analog-to-digital conversion can be realized with the DC Kerr effect based MZI modulators without signal equalization.
Third, the DC Kerr effect is not limited to telecom wavelengths, so phase shifters can be realized at all wavelengths within the silicon transparency window.
Characterizations of Devices with Phase Matching
Devices with the phase matching condition satisfied for nonlinear optical effects can be characterized using waveguides substantially similar to the apparatus 100 illustrated in
Signal and pump wavelengths at λ2ω˜1.145 μm and λω˜2.29 μm can be used for characterization. The signal wavelength can be within the transparent silicon region to reduce absorption. The tensor elements can be: χxxxx(3)=(6±3.5)×10−19 m2/V2 at λω˜2.29 μm. The bulk second order nonlinearity within the silicon waveguide can be as large as χxxx(2)=3χxxxx(3)EDCx=72±42 pm/V for an applied field that is equal to the silicon breakdown field, EDCx=40V/μm. The effective second order nonlinear susceptibility
The core of the silicon waveguide can be about 800 nm wide for increasing the overlap integral between the fundamental TE pump and signal modes while reducing the electrical voltage for generating large electric fields. The electric field within the silicon core waveguide can be simulated using Synopsys's Sentaurus software suite. When a reverse bias of 21V is applied to the junction, the electric field can be quite uniform inside the silicon core with EDCx=25V/μm and the effective second order nonlinearity is simulated to be
Although a large second order nonlinearity can be induced in silicon, it can be still beneficial for the pump and signal propagation constants (kω,k2ω) to be phase-matched for efficient second harmonic generation: 2kω−k2ω=0. This is typically not the case for the fundamental TE optical modes due to waveguide and modal dispersion: kω=6.132 μm−1, k2ω=16.627 μm−1 at λω˜2.29 μm and λ2ω˜1.145 μm.
Therefore, the pump and signal can be coupled when both are in phase and decoupled when both are out of phase. This is referred to as quasi-phase matching. A spatially periodic electric field along the waveguide can be used for quasi-phase matching pump and signal modes in silicon. Lateral junctions are placed with a period of Λ=1.44 μm to realize the periodic electric field (see, e.g.
The period Λ can be selected to match two times the coherence length for first order quasi-phase matching:
The generated second harmonic power P2ω for a quasi-phase matched nonlinear media can be derived using nonlinear coupled mode theory and the undepleted-pump approximation:
where nω=2.245 and n2ω=3.043 are the effective refractive indices at the pump and signal wavelengths, αω=3.6 cm−1 and α2ω=0.2 cm−1 are the simulated optical power loss coefficients at pump and signal wavelengths, Pω is the pump power, Λ=0.0915 μm2 is the modal area, L=1 mm and Lqgm=0.5 mm are the nonlinear waveguide and the quasi-phase matched section lengths, Δk=k2ωTE
The pump power dependence of the SHG can be calculated using Equation (13), as shown in
As understood in the art, lithography can lead to variations in duty cycle. The expected conversion efficiency as a function of duty cycle error, <η>, normalized to the ideal ηo, can be derived to be <η>/η0≅e−(√{square root over (2)}πσ/π)
Furthermore, when the waveguide width and the spatial period are altered in different waveguides, the quasi-phase matched pump wavelength can be designed to be within λω=2λ2ω=2.15 μm and λω=2λ2ω=2.42 μm. The pump depletion can be calculated to be effective beyond 1 W pump power inside silicon and can be negligible in this power range (Pω<100 mW).
For the DC Kerr modulators, a continuous-wave (CW) laser at X-1580 nm was coupled through a single mode fiber (SMF-28) to an inverse silicon taper. The linearly polarized output of the SMF-28 and the fundamental TE mode of the on-chip waveguide can be aligned using a fiber polarization controller. Another SMF-28 fiber can be used to collect the output light.
For the EFISHG devices, a near-infrared CW tunable pump laser was free-space coupled to one end of a single mode fiber (SMF-2000) and the other end of the fiber was cleaved. The cleaved fiber end was used to couple pump laser to an on-chip inverse silicon taper. A polarization controller was used to align the linearly polarized output of the SW-2000 and the fundamental TE mode of the on-chip waveguide. The on-chip pump and harmonic powers were calibrated by measuring fiber-to-chip coupling losses (12 dB and 6 dB for pump and signal wavelengths) and waveguide losses (αω=3.3 cm−1 and α2ω=0.3 cm−1) using waveguides with varying lengths. The waveguide losses were in agreement with the simulated numbers. The maximum on-chip pump power around λω˜2.29 μm was about Pω=25 mW (see
The second harmonic generators can be fabricated on a 300 mm SOI wafer (see, e.g.,
Linear scaling of SHG efficiency as a function of electric field is recorded (see
The SHG power was also measured with external OSAs as a function of reverse bias voltage and signal and pump wavelengths, which are shown in
The spectral response at VDC=−21V is overlaid with the simulations in
While various inventive embodiments have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments described herein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the inventive teachings is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.
The above-described embodiments can be implemented in any of numerous ways. For example, embodiments of designing and making the technology disclosed herein may be implemented using hardware, software or a combination thereof. When implemented in software, the software code can be executed on any suitable processor or collection of processors, whether provided in a single computer or distributed among multiple computers.
Further, it should be appreciated that a computer may be embodied in any of a number of forms, such as a rack-mounted computer, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, or a tablet computer. Additionally, a computer may be embedded in a device not generally regarded as a computer but with suitable processing capabilities, including a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a smart phone or any other suitable portable or fixed electronic device.
Also, a computer may have one or more input and output devices. These devices can be used, among other things, to present a user interface. Examples of output devices that can be used to provide a user interface include printers or display screens for visual presentation of output and speakers or other sound generating devices for audible presentation of output. Examples of input devices that can be used for a user interface include keyboards, and pointing devices, such as mice, touch pads, and digitizing tablets. As another example, a computer may receive input information through speech recognition or in other audible format.
Such computers may be interconnected by one or more networks in any suitable form, including a local area network or a wide area network, such as an enterprise network, and intelligent network (IN) or the Internet. Such networks may be based on any suitable technology and may operate according to any suitable protocol and may include wireless networks, wired networks or fiber optic networks.
The various methods or processes (outlined herein may be coded as software that is executable on one or more processors that employ any one of a variety of operating systems or platforms. Additionally, such software may be written using any of a number of suitable programming languages and/or programming or scripting tools, and also may be compiled as executable machine language code or intermediate code that is executed on a framework or virtual machine.
In this respect, various inventive concepts may be embodied as a computer readable storage medium (or multiple computer readable storage media) (e.g., a computer memory, one or more floppy discs, compact discs, optical discs, magnetic tapes, flash memories, circuit configurations in Field Programmable Gate Arrays or other semiconductor devices, or other non-transitory medium or tangible computer storage medium) encoded with one or more programs that, when executed on one or more computers or other processors, perform methods that implement the various embodiments of the invention discussed above. The computer readable medium or media can be transportable, such that the program or programs stored thereon can be loaded onto one or more different computers or other processors to implement various aspects of the present invention as discussed above.
The terms “program” or “software” are used herein in a generic sense to refer to any type of computer code or set of computer-executable instructions that can be employed to program a computer or other processor to implement various aspects of embodiments as discussed above. Additionally, it should be appreciated that according to one aspect, one or more computer programs that when executed perform methods of the present invention need not reside on a single computer or processor, but may be distributed in a modular fashion amongst a number of different computers or processors to implement various aspects of the present invention.
Computer-executable instructions may be in many forms, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
Also, data structures may be stored in computer-readable media in any suitable form. For simplicity of illustration, data structures may be shown to have fields that are related through location in the data structure. Such relationships may likewise be achieved by assigning storage for the fields with locations in a computer-readable medium that convey relationship between the fields. However, any suitable mechanism may be used to establish a relationship between information in fields of a data structure, including through the use of pointers, tags or other mechanisms that establish relationship between data elements.
Also, various inventive concepts may be embodied as one or more methods, of which an example has been provided. The acts performed as part of the method may be ordered in any suitable way. Accordingly, embodiments may be constructed in which acts are performed in an order different than illustrated, which may include performing some acts simultaneously, even though shown as sequential acts in illustrative embodiments.
All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with “and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B”, when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” can refer, in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements); etc.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e., “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or “exactly one of” “Consisting essentially of,” when used in the claims, shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “at least one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) can refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.
In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/259,820, filed Nov. 25, 2015, entitled “ON-CHIP ELECTRIC FIELD INDUCED NONLINEAR EFFECTS ON SILICON,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application also claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/307,749, filed Mar. 14, 2016, entitled “ON-CHIP ELECTRIC FIELD INDUCED NONLINEAR EFFECTS ON SILICON,” which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. HR0011-12-2-0007 awarded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6881989 | Kajii et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7239762 | Kimerling et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7907848 | Soref | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8380016 | Hochberg et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
20130209023 | Prosyk | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150226987 | Park | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Chmielak et al., “Pockels effect based fully integrated, strained silicon electro-optic modulator,” Optics Express, vol. 19, No. 18, Aug. 29, 2011, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US16/63299, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 10 pages. |
Avrutsky, I. et al., “Phase-matched sum frequency generation in strained silicon waveguides using their second-order nonlinear optical susceptibility,” Optics Express, vol. 19, No. 22, pp. 21707-21716 (2011). |
Bortz, M. L. et al., “Noncritical Quasi-Phase-Matched Second Harmonic Generation in an Annealed Proton-Exchanged LiNbO3 Waveguide,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Electronics, vol. 30, No. 12, pp. 2953-2960 (1994). |
Cada, M. et al., “Optical Wave Propagation in Kerr Media,” Chapter 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/51293, 18 pages (2013). |
Cazzanell, M. et al., “Second-harmonic generation in silicon waveguides strained by silicon nitride,” Nature Materials, vol. 11, pp. 148-154 (2012). |
Dulkeith, E. et al., “Self-phase-modulation in submicron silicon-on-insulator photonic wires,” Optics Express, vol. 14, No. 12, pp. 5524-5534 (2006). |
Green, W. M. J. et al., “Ultra-compact, low RF power, 10 Gb/s silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator,” Optics Express, vol. 15, No. 25, pp. 17106-17113 (2007). |
Heinz, T. F., “Second-Order nonlinear Optical Effects at Surfaces and Interfaces,” Nonlinear Surface Electromagnetic Phenomena, H. —E. Ponath et al. (Eds.), pp. 353-416 (1991). |
Hon, N. K. et al., “The third-order nonlinear optical coefficients of Si, Ge, and Si1-xGex in the midwave and longwave infrared,” Journal of Applied Physics, 110(1), 011301; doi: 10.1063/1.3592270, 9 pages (2011). |
Kuo, P. S. et al., “Second-harmonic generation using 4-quasi-phasematching in a GaAs whispering-gallery-mode microcavity,” Nature Communications, 5:3109; doi: 10.1038/ncomms4109, 7 pages (2014). |
Levy, J. S. et al., “Harmonic generation in silicon nitride ring resonators,” Optics Express, vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 11415-11421 (2011). |
Lüpke, G., “Characterization of semiconductor interfaces by second-harmonic generation,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 35, pp. 75-161 (1999). |
Maker, P. D. et al., “Study of optical effects due to an induced polarization third order in the electric field strength,” Physical Review, vol. 137, No. 3A, pp. A801-A818 (1965). |
Popović, M., “Complex-frequency leaky mode computations using PML boundary layers for dielectric resonant structures,” in Proceedings of Integrated Photonics Research, 3 pages (2003). |
Qasymeh, M. et al., “Quadratic Electro-Optic Kerr Effect: Applications to Photonic Devices,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 740-746 (2008). |
Soref, R. A. et al., “Electrooptical Effects in Silicon,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. QE-23, No. 1, pp. 123-129 (1987). |
Sutherland, R. L., “Handbook of Nonlinear Optics,” Chapter 7, CRC Press, 83 pages (2003). |
Szilagyi, A. et al., “A quasi-phase-matching technique for efficient optical mixing and frequency doubling,” Journal of Applied Physics, 47:2025; doi: 10.1063/1.322930, 9 pages (1976). |
Timurdogan, E. et al., “An ultralow power athermal silicon modulator,” Nature Communications, 5:4008; doi: 10.1038/ncomms5008, 11 pages (2014). |
Watts, M. R. et al., “Low-voltage, compact, depletion-mode, silicon Mach-Zehnder modulator,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in quantum Electronics, vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 159-164 (2010). |
Watts, M. R. et al., “Vertical junction silicon microdisk modulators and switches,” Optics Express, vol. 19, No. 22, pp. 21989-22003 (2011). |
Xiong, C. et al., “Integrated GaN photonic circuits on silicon (100) for second harmonic generation,” Optics Express, vol. 19, No. 11, pp. 10462-10470 (2011). |
Xu, Q. et al., “Micrometre-scale silicon electrooptic modulator,” Nature, vol. 435, pp. 325-327 (2005). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170146887 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62259820 | Nov 2015 | US | |
62307749 | Mar 2016 | US |