This invention relates to an apparatus for applying compositions to skin, and other keratinous surfaces. The compositions can modify color or structure of the keratinous surface.
Tonal variations on human skin have multiple causes. Acne, freckles, sun damage, and age spots are just a few of the common causes of visible defects on skin. Textural variations such as fine lines, wrinkles and scars are also well known. Both tonal and textural deviations are highly noticeable to the human eye, even when they are quite small. Covering large areas of skin on and around deviations with makeup or other concealers is known.
Moreover, attempts have been made at more precise, and localized application of compositions that hide, or cover-up skin deviations. Handheld devices that are moved across the skin have been developed to apply skin treatment compositions to local defects. But these devices have been plagued by the absence of two necessary components, speed and accuracy. For these handheld devices to work effectively, they must find the defects quickly, and treat them immediately. Finding a spot on the skin is of little use if the user has moved the applicator head to a different area of the skin before the spot can be effectively treated.
Therefore, there exists a need for methods and apparatuses that can quickly and precisely detect tonal and textural defects on skin. Then with equal speed and precision, apply treatment compositions directly to the deviations. These methods and apparatuses are defined by the present invention.
The present invention relates to a method and device for analyzing and treating tonal imperfections on human skin. The method has the steps of taking at least one background image of at least 10 μm2 of skin and calculating the average background L value of the image on a grey scale. One or more treatment images of the skin are taken and at least one localized L value of individual pixels or group of pixels is calculated within the treatment image. The local L value is compared to the background L value. Skin deviations are areas of skin where the absolute value of the difference between a local L and the background L, ΔLM, is greater than a predetermined ΔLS (where “M” refers to a measured ΔL and “S” refers to a set ΔL). Skin deviations are identified by this method and then treated with a treatment composition.
The present invention solves many problems with prior devices and methods. Specifically, tonal variations on skin are more accurately and quickly detected. The speed with which a skin deviation is found and identified is critical because the applicator is continuously moving across the skin. The quicker the deviation is identified, the quicker the applicator nozzle, or nozzles can be activated. The quicker the nozzles are activated the more likely the skin treatment composition will hit the deviation precisely. This allows for the optimal coverage of the deviation, and minimal coverage on the areas of natural skin that do not need treatment. Thus, the simpler the detection algorithm is, and the simpler the apparatus is that implements the algorithm is, the quicker and more precise the overall correction process is. This is a substantial improvement over more complicated, slower and less precise apparatuses and methods of the past.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the present invention, it is believed the same will be better understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which:
The present invention may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description of illustrative and preferred embodiments. It is to be understood that the scope of the claims is not limited to the specific compositions, methods, conditions, devices, or parameters described herein, and that the terminology used herein is not intended to be limiting of the claimed invention. Also, as used in the specification, including the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural, and reference to a particular numerical value includes at least that particular value, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. When a range of values is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent basis “about,” it will be understood that the particular values form another embodiment. All ranges are inclusive and combinable.
The term “frexel” is defined as a small pixel-like region of the keratinous surface. A frexel might correspond to a small portion of a freckle or other skin feature, or it may correspond to an area of the keratinous surface that does not have special features. The term frexel is used to suggest that what is being measured is on a 3-D surface rather than a flat surface. A region of keratinous surface is comprised of a plurality of frexels. For instance, if a resolution of 300 dots per inch (11.8 dots per mm or “dpmm”) is used, a frexel may have a width and height of about 1/300th of an inch (0.085 mm) so that there are approximately 90,000 frexels per square inch (about 140 frexels per square mm). The surface of the human body may have millions of frexels.
All percentages and ratios used herein are by weight of the total composition, and all measurements made are at 25° C., unless otherwise designated.
The methods, apparatuses, and compositions of the present invention are best understood with reference to the method of use. Each of the process steps, the apparatuses and the compositions used in that step are described in turn below.
The present methods, in their simplest form, are directed to analyzing and treating tonal imperfections on human skin that comprises the steps of taking at least one background image of at least 10 μm2 of skin and then calculating the average background L value of the image on a grey scale. Further, from the same image, a localized L value is calculated for individual pixels or a group of pixels. The local L value is then compared to the background L value to identify skin deviations. A skin deviation is an area of skin where the absolute value of the difference between a local L value and the background L, (this difference being defined as “ΔLM” or the measured ΔL, “Δ” is commonly defined as the symbol for a difference between two values) is greater than a predetermined ΔLS. The background L can be preset, or calculated by a variety of methods described below. The skin deviations are then treated with a treatment composition having a predetermined or variable contrast ratio.
The background L can be calculated anywhere within the image. The image is taken where the nozzles will fire the treatment composition. The background L can be the arithmetic average, median, or mean of a plurality of local LS, which means the calculation can include all of the local LS in the image, or a subset thereof.
Likewise, there are provided apparatuses for treating human skin. The apparatus has an applicator head that includes multiple applicator nozzles and a reservoir for containing a treatment composition, which can be a skin treatment composition. There is further provided a sensor, an optional illumination source and a CPU. The optional illumination source illuminates the skin area, the sensor takes an image of at least 10 μm2 of skin and the CPU analyzes the image to calculate the average background L value. The sensor output is also used to calculate the localized L value of individual pixels or groups of pixels of skin. The CPU then compares the local L value to the background L value to identify skin deviations where the difference between the two L values is greater than a predetermined value. The sensor readings contain values selected from the group of color, brightness, reflectance, refractance, temperature, texture and mixtures thereof.
Exemplary treatment compositions for use with the present system include cosmetics, polymerics, polymeric actives, aqueous, non-aqueous, particle loaded, optical modifier, fillers, optical matchers, skin actives, nail actives, hair actives, oral care actives, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antimicrobial, surfactant or surfactant containing active, quantum dots and combinations thereof. Exemplary surfaces and substrates for the application of the treatment composition by the present deposition system include keratinous surfaces, woven surfaces, non-woven surfaces, porous surfaces, non-porous surfaces, wood, teeth, tongue, metallic, tile, fabric, and combinations thereof
The central processing unit (“CPU”) of the device can be any of a variety of commercially available devices. In its simplest form, the CPU is a single programmable chip like those found in consumer electronic devices such as a lap top computer, a cell phone, an electric razor and the like. Those skilled in the art will know of a variety of commercially available chips and other processors suitable for use with this invention. CPU may include Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), controller, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), integrated circuit, microcontroller, microprocessor, processor, and the like. The CPU may also include memory functionality, either internal to the CPU as cache memory, for example Random Access Memory (RAM), Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) and the like or external to the CPU for example as Dynamic Random-Access Memory (DRAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Static RAM, Flash Memory (e.g., Compact Flash or SmartMedia cards), disk drives, Solid State Disk Drives (SSD) or even Internet Cloud storage. While it is anticipated that a remote CPU, either tethered to the device, or which communicates wirelessly, can be used to accomplish the methods of the present invention, a local CPU within the device is exemplified herein. Size and speed of the CPU is an important consideration of the design parameters, but cost and other considerations will be considered by the device designers.
The predetermined ΔLS is the absolute value of the difference between the local L and the background L. This value, ΔLS, can be defined in absolute numbers or as a percentage. The sensor is for example a camera that takes black and white or color images, a spectrophotometer or similar devices that are sensitive to electromagnetic energy wavelengths. The images are taken, or converted to a standard grey scale that is known to the art. It is understood that any numerical scale that measures lightness to darkness can be considered a “grey scale”. Moreover, as used herein, “grey scale” is intended to be a linear scale, or one band, or one visual attribute. For example, one “grey scale” visual attribute could be single wavelength or a narrow wavelength to define a specific visual color. Another example of one “grey scale” visual attribute could be a mix of wavelength numerical values averaged for each pixel making up the image, such as a true black, grey or white image from an RGB mixture.
It will also be understood to those skilled in the art that the background L value should not be too close to the ends of this scale. For example, if the grey scale is 0-100, with 0 being pure black and 100 being pure white, a background in the 0-10 range, or in the 90-100 range may be too light or too dark to show meaningful differences. Accordingly, one can adjust the background lighting, or the gain on the camera taking the image, to move the background L closer to the middle of the scale. In this example, a background L of 50 would be ideal, with a background L in the range of 10-90 preferred, 20-80 even more preferred.
The most common grey scale is 0-255 (no units) and other examples include 0-1024 and 0-4096. For a grey scale of 0-255, the difference between grey scale steps is at least 1/255. In this example it would be desirable to use camera and lighting settings that provide a background L value between 60 and 210. Using the 0-255 gray scale the ΔLS is preferably at least 0.5, more preferably at least 1 and even more preferably at least 1.5, to initiate treatment of the skin. Likewise, ΔLS can be measured as a percentage, for example, a numerical ΔLS of 2.6 is approximately equal to 1.0% of a 255 grey scale. Thus ΔLS may be plus or minus 0.25%, preferably plus or minus 0.5% even more preferably plus or minus 0.75%, of the grayscale.
The skin treatment compositions used to hide, or more appropriately, to camouflage a skin deviation are described and exemplified in greater detail below. One important characteristic of the skin treatment compositions of the present invention is the contrast ratio. The contrast ratio of the treatment composition when treating the skin is at least 0.1. The skin lightness and treatment composition lightness can be measured by a calibrated spectrophotometer using known methods. In the case of using a calibrated spectrophotometer, the average L value of human skin usually spans the range of about 25 to 75. In this case the corresponding treatment composition has a lightness value of at least 2 units greater, preferably at least 3 units greater, and even more preferably at least 5 units greater than the average skin lightness value of the consumer.
Images are taken in sequence or preferably continuously. A camera that takes a minimum of 4 frames per second is preferred. Higher speed cameras (greater than 4 frames per second) are desired as well, for example greater 100 frames per second and even greater than 200 frames per second and even greater than 600 frames per second. All images are either taken in a grey scale or converted to a grey scale, and the grey scale can have any range, for example, 0-255, no units. This corresponds approximately to a refresh rate of 0.2 seconds or faster. Consistent with the camera, the CPU processes at a rate of 100 frames per second and even greater than 200 frames per second and even greater than 600 frames per second.
There is no technical difference between an image used for background L values and those used for local L values, the difference is in the analysis of the image. Hence, the images are continually sent to the CPU, that is, the processing unit, to calculate the L values, and ΔLM values. By “sent” it is understood, that preferably at least 4 bits of data per pixel are transferred for each image, and preferably, this 4 bit (or more) packet of data is used in the calculation of each local L value. It is understood, that the background L can be calculated once in a treatment period and that value reused throughout the treatment period. Or it can be continually recalculated as long as the treatment process goes on. Moreover, there can be pre-programmed triggers to initiate a recalculation of the background L. Also, the background L may be retrieved from the CPU memory to be used for the current background L. For example, if an extended period of time elapses and no skin deviations are found, or if skin deviations are being found too frequently, a new background L might automatically be calculated. This extended period of time may be 1 second or greater. Likewise, ΔLS can be a set value that remains constant throughout the treatment cycle or it too can vary. ΔLS can be reset during the treatment cycle for any of a variety of reasons. If too many nozzles are firing too frequently, the ΔLS can be adjusted to lower the intensity of the nozzle firing. Similarly, if the nozzles are firing too infrequently, ΔLS can be adjusted in the opposite direction to increase the sensitivity of skin deviation detection. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that modifying ΔLS during treatment is a matter of programming the CPU to or with a desired algorithm.
When the ΔLM exceeds the predetermined value, the skin deviation is treated with the treatment composition. Treatment requires firing one or more of the nozzles which dispense the treatment composition onto the skin in the area of the skin deviation. Preferably the treatment composition is applied to the skin deviations in a discontinuous deposition pattern of discrete droplets between about 0.1 μm to about 50 μm in size. It is also preferred that no more than 85% to 95% of the skin deviation is covered by the treatment composition. More specifically, the treatment composition is applied via a array of nozzles and the local L is calculated along the length of, and in the firing range of, the array of nozzles. The “array” can be a linear configuration, multiple rows, off-set, sine wave, curved, circular, or saw tooth arrangements of nozzles. Those skilled in the printing arts will appreciate the various configurations of nozzle arrays that are possible for use in the methods and apparatuses disclosed herein. The “firing range” of a nozzle will vary based on its size, type, the speed the device is moving, distance from the target, and other parameters. Examples of various types of nozzles suitable for use in the present devices are given below. But in general, “near the nozzle” as used herein is meant to mean the image taken to calculate a local L value is close to the area of skin where the treatment composition is deposited by the nozzle (the firing range, or landing zone of the nozzle). Without intending to limit the invention, near the nozzle means the image should be taken within a radius of about 2 cm, preferably about 1 cm and even more preferably, about 0.7 cm from the center of the nozzle.
An individual nozzle may be fired to deposit the treatment composition, or multiple nozzles fired at the same time. The number of nozzles fired along the linear array of nozzles can be adjusted based on the size of the ΔLM and the size of the skin deviation. Furthermore the frequency of nozzle firing can be adjusted based on the ΔLM, with more droplets being fired in succession in response to larger ΔLM values.
Firing intensity curves can be programmed into the CPU to adjust the firing rate of nozzles. For example, if ΔLM is equal to or slightly greater than ΔLS, then the adjacent nozzle is fired 1 time. If ΔLM increases to 2*ΔLS, then the adjacent nozzle is fired 25 times. If the ΔLM is 3*ΔLS, then the adjacent nozzle is fired 100 times. This non-limiting example is intended to show how the size of the ΔLM with respect to the ΔLS can determine the amount, and hence, the intensity of the firing of the nozzles adjacent the skin deviation. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that plotting a firing intensity curve using 2, 3 or more data points, and then programming that firing intensity curve into the CPU are known techniques.
The methods and apparatuses used by the present invention can be briefly summarized as follows. Referring now to
Treatment times will vary based on the size of the treatment area and the precision and amount of the treatment. For example, a woman may wish to simply touch up a few small areas on her face before going to the grocery store. This treatment might take a few minutes. Alternatively, a young bride might wear her wedding dress to a salon where a salon professional meticulously treats all exposed areas of skin prior to the wedding and the taking of her wedding pictures. This full body treatment might take hours. Accordingly, the consumer will have tremendous control over the amount of time they choose to use the present device.
Referring now to
Image capture device 46 can be any of a variety of commercially available devices such as a simple camera or a digital cmos camera chip. Image capture device 46 takes a picture of skin 18 and sends it to processor 50 via image capture line 48 for analysis. Processor 50 is generally referred to as a central processing unit, or CPU, which may comprise a simple circuit board, a more complex computer, or the like and may include memory functionality. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a CPU can be any of wide variety of commercially available programmable devices. As described above, the image may be analyzed for local L values, background L values or both. Grey scale conversion occurs within the analytical processing capabilities of processor 50. The comparison of background L to local L to determine the ΔLM occurs within processor 50, which can be a commercially available programmable chip, or other commercially available processing units.
The results of the image analysis, when compared to criteria pre-programmed into the processor, may result in a desired treatment of the skin. In such a case, for example when the calculate ΔLM exceeds the pre-determined ΔLS, a signal is sent from processor 50 to cartridge 52, via cartridge line 51, to fire one or more of the nozzles in nozzle array 20. Power for cartridge 52, light 44, image capture device 46, processor 50, and other mechanical and electrical elements that might be present is supplied by power element 54 via multiple power lines 55. Power element 54 can be turned off and on, which in turn turns apparatus 40 off and on, via power switch 56 which can be located anywhere on apparatus 40, but is shown here on apparatus cover 58. Power element 54 may include energy storage functionality via a battery, a rechargeable battery, an electrochemical capacitor, a double-layer capacitor, a supercapacitor or a hybrid battery-capacitor system.
Turning now to
Treatment composition 74 within cartridge body 64 may comprise particles and the treatment compositions preferably have a particle settling rate of less than 0.06 mm per day at 25° C. and 1 atm pressure. The treatment composition may further have an elastic modulus between about 0.1 Pa to about 1000 Pa at 25 C and 1000 Hz. Solid wax based treatment compositions may have an elastic modulus of up to about 100 MPa. Preferably, the particles in the treatment composition have a refractive index of between about 1.1 and about 5.0.
While inkjet cartridges are shown and exemplified herein, treatment compositions may be applied with other “flow control” devices or non-drop control devices. Flow control devices typically are characterized as “drop control techniques” where individual droplets of the substance are controlled. Ink jet printers, which are known to the art, are examples of drop on demand applicators and this technology is applicable for use in the present invention. Piezo electric drop control devices and other micro electromechanical systems are appropriate for use with the current devices. Spray devices and electrostatic spray devices are non-drop control techniques where droplets are produced and controlled only in aggregate. Often in a spray device, a lack of individual droplet control, or “randomness” is desired in order to produce a smooth application over a relatively large area. By contrast, it is often desirable to provide very specific control of the amount and placement of the treatment compositions.
Examples of drop control include “fine flow control” where the flow of the substance is precisely controlled to deliver droplets as desired; and “inkjet technologies.” An older inkjet technology includes supplying a continuous flow of charged droplets past electrostatic deflector plates which are alternately charged so that the plates either permit a droplet to pass or deflect to a gutter. This technique was the original design basis for inkjet printers. Other inkjet technologies include “drop on demand” such as thermal devices provided by Hewlett Packard, and piezoelectric devices such as provided by Epson and other printer manufacturers. In one embodiment of the current invention, the drop on demand technology is combined with charging the droplets.
Equipment that might be useful in constructing an apparatus of the present invention are described in the following published patent applications: WO 2008/098234 A2, Handheld Apparatus and Method for the Automated Application of Cosmetics and Other Surfaces, first filed 11 Feb. 2007; WO 2008/100878 A1, System and Method for Applying a Treatment composition to Change a Person's Appearance Based on a Digital Image, first filed 12 Feb. 2007; WO 2008/098235 A2, System and Method for Providing Simulated Images Through Cosmetic Monitoring, first filed 11 Feb. 2007; WO 2008/100880 A1, System and Method for Applying Agent Electrostatically to Human Skin, first filed 12 Feb. 2007; US 2007/0049832 A1, System and Method for Medical Monitoring and Treatment Through Cosmetic Monitoring and Treatment, first filed 12 Aug. 2005; and US 2007/0035815 A1, System and Method for Applying a Treatment composition to Improve the Visual Attractiveness of Human Skin, first filed 12 Aug. 2005; All six applications filed by Edgar et al. The entire disclosure of each of the six Edgar et al. applications is incorporated herein by reference.
The apparatuses of the present invention are preferably handheld but can be tethered to a structure that moves the apparatus across the keratinous surface to be modified. If handheld, the consumer would simply move the apparatus across the keratinous surface to be treated. Optionally, multiple apparatuses can be configured in a stationary structure wherein the consumer places the keratinous surface to be modified and multiple readings and applications occur simultaneously or in sequence.
The treatment composition can be applied to the keratinous surface by scanning and applying at the same time while making multiple passes over the surface. Several advantages result from using multiple pass application. The process for multiple pass applications is to make a partial application of the treatment composition, then to scan again the area of skin that has received the partial application. A further application of treatment compositions can be made, and still further multiple pass scanning and applications can be made to approach an aesthetic goal. Thus, the consumer can select the end point of the treatment, i.e. the “aesthetic goal”, thus tailoring the treatment time to individual needs and preferences. Attempting to make all corrections in one treatment pass has been shown to overcorrect in certain areas.
It may be desirable for the apparatus to treat from about 1.0% to about 10% of the keratinous surface that is read by the sensor with a treatment composition. And the applicator may apply the first treatment composition in droplets having an average diameter of from about from about 0.1 μm to about 50 μm.
The present invention may utilize a variety of treatment compositions, for example, inks, dyes, pigments, adhesives, curable compositions, optically activated compounds (for example, semiconductor quantum dots), metal oxides (for example, TiO2), hollow spheres, bleaching agents, texture reducing polymers, skin care compositions, hair colorants, hair removal compositions (often referred to as depilatories), hair growth stimulants and mixtures thereof.
The treatment compositions of this invention can be delivered alone or in the presence of a dermatologically-acceptable carrier. The phrase “dermatologically-acceptable carrier”, as used herein, means that the carrier is suitable for topical application to the keratinous tissue, has good aesthetic properties, is compatible with any additional components of the skin care composition, and will not cause any untoward safety or toxicity concerns. The carrier can be in a wide variety of forms. Non-limiting examples include simple solutions (water or oil based), emulsions, and solid forms (gels, sticks, flowable solids, wax, amorphous materials). In certain embodiments, the dermatologically acceptable carrier is in the form of an emulsion. Emulsion may be generally classified as having a continuous aqueous phase (e.g., oil-in-water and water-in-oil-in-water) or a continuous oil phase (e.g., water-in-oil and oil-in-water-in-oil). The oil phase of the present invention may comprise silicone oils, non-silicone oils such as hydrocarbon oils, esters, ethers, and the like, and mixtures thereof. For example, emulsion carriers can include, but are not limited to, continuous water phase emulsions such as silicone-in-water, oil-in-water, and water-in-oil-in-water emulsion; and continuous oil phase emulsions such as water-in-oil and water-in-silicone emulsions, and oil-in-water-in-silicone emulsions. The treatment composition can be delivered in a variety of product forms including, but not limited to, a cream, a lotion, a gel, a foam, a paste, or a serum. Additionally, the treatment composition can include for purposes of proper formulation and stabilization anti-fungal and anti-bacterial components.
The treatment compositions of the present invention may comprises humectants as a carrier or chassis for the other components in the treatment composition. An exemplary class of humectants is polyhydric alcohols. Suitable polyhydric alcohols include polyalkylene glycols and alkylene polyols and their derivatives, including propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polyethylene glycol and derivatives thereof; sorbitol; hydroxypropyl sorbitol; erythritol; threitol; pentaerythritol; xylitol; glucitol; mannitol; butylene glycol (e.g., 1,3-butylene glycol); pentylene glycol; hexane triol (e.g., 1,2,6-hexanetriol); glycerin; ethoxylated glycerine; and propoxylated glycerine.
Other suitable humectants include sodium 2-pyrrolidone-5-carboxylate, guanidine; glycolic acid and glycolate salts (e.g., ammonium and quaternary alkyl ammonium); lactic acid and lactate salts (e.g., ammonium and quaternary alkyl ammonium); aloe vera in any of its variety of forms (e.g., aloe vera gel); hyaluronic acid and derivatives thereof (e.g., salt derivatives such as sodium hyaluronate); lactamide monoethanolamine; acetamide monoethanolamine; urea; sodium pyroglutamate, water-soluble glyceryl poly(meth)acrylate lubricants (such as Hispagel®) and mixtures thereof.
Inks, dyes, metal oxides and pigments (collectively referred to as “colorants” below) are used to modify the color or reflectance of the keratinous surface. These compositions are commonly used to modify color and reflectance in cosmetic, “make-up” compositions. Foundation, lipstick, eyeliner are just a few examples of these compositions, but they are all applied evenly across large portions of the keratinous surface, that is they are macro-applications. In sharp contrast, the present treatment compositions are selectively applied on a very small scale to select areas, that is, a micro application. Suitable colorants may include inorganic or organic pigments and powders. Organic pigments can include natural colorants and synthetic monomeric and polymeric colorants. Organic pigments include various aromatic types such as azo, indigoid, triphenylmethane, anthraquinone, and xanthine dyes which are designated as D&C and FD&C blues, browns, greens, oranges, reds, yellows, etc. Organic pigments may consist of insoluble metallic salts of certified color additives, referred to as the Lakes. Inorganic pigments include iron oxides, ferric ammonium ferrocyanide, manganese violet, ultramarines, chromium, chromium hydroxide colors, and mixtures thereof. The pigments may be coated with one or more ingredients that cause the pigments to be hydrophobic. Suitable coating materials that will render the pigments more lipophilic in nature include silicones, lecithin, amino acids, phospholipids, inorganic and organic oils, polyethylene, and other polymeric materials. Suitable silicone treated pigments as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,143,722. Inorganic white or uncolored pigments include TiO2, ZnO, ZrO2 hollow spheres, or semiconductor quantum dots, which are commercially available from a number of sources. Other suitable colorants are identified in U.S. Pat. No. 7,166,279. Colorants are generally included at a weight percent such that the skin care composition yields a perceptible color. The colorant particle shape is typically spherical, polygonal or fractal. In one embodiment, the skin care composition exhibits a color that is perceptibly different from the color of the applicator. By perceptibly different, refers to a difference in color that is perceptible to a person having normal sensory abilities under standard lighting conditions (e.g., natural illumination as experienced outdoors during daylight hours, the illumination of a standard 100 watt incandescent or equivalent LED white light bulb at a distance of 2 meters, or as defined by CIE D65 standard illuminate lighting at 800 lux to a 1964 CIE standard observer).
Adhesives that are compatible with keratinous surfaces are known and any such adhesive can be applied with the apparatuses of the present invention. Commercially available adhesives compatible with keratinous surfaces are available from the 3M Corporation of Minneapolis Minn. See, for example: U.S. Pat. No. 6,461,467, issued to Blatchford, et al., filed on Apr. 23, 2001; U.S. Pat. No. 5,614,310, issued to Delgado, et al., filed on Nov. 4, 1994; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,160,315, issued to Heinecke et al., filed on Apr. 5, 1991. The entire disclosures of these patent applications are incorporated by reference. After the adhesive is selectively applied to the keratinous surface, a second treatment composition can be dusted on the keratinous surface where it will stick to the adhesive. The second modification that is not adhered to the keratinous surface can then be removed leaving behind a selective, micro application of the second treatment composition. Likewise compositions that cure upon exposure to certain wavelengths of energy, infrared or UV light for example, are known to the art and can be applied by the apparatuses of the present invention. By this method, the curable composition is selectively applied to the keratinous surface and then it is cured by exposing the keratinous surface to the curing energy source. The entire keratinous surface can be exposed, or the exposure can be done at the same time as the application.
Wrinkle or texture reducing polymers and skin tightening are known. See, for example: U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,829, issued to Estrin on Oct. 31, 2000; and US Patent Applications US20060210513A1, filed by Luizzi, et al. on Mar. 21, 2005; US20070224158A1, filed by Cassin et al. on Mar. 18, 2005; and US20070148120A1, filed by Omura et al. on Jan. 14, 2005. The entire disclosures of this patent and these published patent applications are incorporated by reference. More specifically, a cosmetic process for softening the wrinkles of wrinkled skin may comprise applying, to the wrinkled skin, a cosmetic composition, in particular an anti-wrinkle composition, comprising, in a physiologically acceptable medium suitable for topical application to the skin of the face: from 0.1 to 20% by weight of at least one tensioning agent, with respect to the total weight of the composition.
Optically-activated particles can be used as or added to the treatment compositions of this invention. Sometimes referred to a “interference pigments”, these particles include a plurality of substrate particles selected from the group consisting of nylons, acrylics, polyesters, other plastic polymers, natural materials, regenerated cellulose, metals, hollow spheres, semiconductor quantum dots and minerals; an optical brightener chemically bonded to each of the plurality of substrate particles to form integral units in the form of optically-activated particles for diffusing light. These particles help to reduce the visual perception of skin imperfections, including cellulite, shadows, skin discolorations, and wrinkles. Each of the optically-activated particles are encapsulated with a UV transparent coating to increase the diffusion of light to further reduce the visual perception of the skin imperfections. The encapsulated optically-activated particles are able to absorb ultraviolet radiation and emit visible light; and the encapsulated optically-activated particles are able to both scatter and absorb light in a diffuse manner in order to reduce the visual perception of skin imperfections, including cellulite, wrinkles, shadows, and skin discolorations, when the optically-activated particles are applied to the skin surface.
Hair colorants and hair removal compositions are also suitable for use with the apparatuses of the present invention. These compositions, and their component parts, are best described by the examples given below. Each of the individual chemical compositions described below for hair colorants can be used in combination with any of the others ingredients, and likewise, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the individual compositions given for depilatories can be used with other ingredients listed in other examples.
Skin care compositions can be applied with the apparatuses of this invention. The skin care composition may be used as, for example, a moisturizer, a conditioner, an anti-aging treatment, a skin lightening treatment, a sunscreen, a sunless tanner, and combinations thereof.
The skin care composition may comprise a safe and effective amount of one or more skin care active (“active”) useful for regulating and/or improving skin condition. “Safe and effective amount” means an amount of a compound or composition sufficient to induce a positive benefit but low enough to avoid serious side effects (i.e., provides a reasonable benefit to risk ratio within the judgment of a skilled artisan). A safe and effective amount of a skin care active can be from about 1×10−6 to about 25% by weight of the total composition, in another embodiment from about 0.0001 to about 25% by weight of the total composition, in another embodiment from about 0.01 to about 10% by weight of the total composition, in another embodiment from about 0.1 to about 5% by weight of the total composition, in another embodiment from about 0.2 to about 2% by weight of the total composition. Suitable actives include, but are not limited to, vitamins (e.g., B3 compounds such as niacinamide, niacinnicotinic acid, tocopheryl nicotinate; B5 compounds, such as panthenol; vitamin A compounds and natural and/or synthetic analogs of Vitamin A, including retinoids, retinol, retinyl acetate, retinyl palmitate, retinoic acid, retinaldehyde, retinyl propionate, carotenoids (pro-vitamin A); vitamin E compounds, or tocopherol, including tocopherol sorbate, tocopherol acetate; vitamin C compounds, including ascorbate, ascorbyl esters of fatty acids, and ascorbic acid derivatives such as magnesium ascorbyl phosphate and sodium ascorbyl phosphate, ascorbyl glucoside, and ascorbyl sorbate), peptides (e.g., peptides containing ten or fewer amino acids, their derivatives, isomers, and complexes with other species such as metal ions), sugar amines (e.g., N-acetyl-glucosamine), sunscreens, oil control agents, tanning actives, anti-acne actives, desquamation actives, anti-cellulite actives, chelating agents, skin lightening agents, flavonoids, protease inhibitors (e.g., hexamidine and derivatives), non-vitamin antioxidants and radical scavengers, peptides, salicylic acid, hair growth regulators, anti-wrinkle actives, anti-atrophy actives, minerals, phytosterols and/or plant hormones, tyrosinase inhibitors, N-acyl amino acid compounds, moisturizers, plant extracts, and derivatives of any of the aforementioned actives. The term “derivative” as used herein refers to structures which are not shown but which one skilled in the art would understand are variations of the basic compound. For example, removing a hydrogen atom from benzene and replacing it with a methyl group. Suitable actives are further described in U.S. application publication No. US2006/0275237A1 and US2004/0175347A1.
Contrast Ratio
Herein, “contrast ratio” refers to the opacity of the composition, or the ability of the composition to reduce or prevent light transmission, determined after the composition is drawn onto an opacity chart (Form N2A, Leneta Company of Manwah, N.J. or the equivalent thereof), and by using a spectrophotometer with settings selected to exclude specular reflection. The composition is applied to the top of the opacity chart and then is drawn into a film having a thickness of approximately 0.01 inches using a film applicator (e.g., as commercially available from BYK Gardner of Columbia, Md., or the equivalent thereof). The film is allowed to dry for 2 hours under conditions of 22° C.+/−1° C., 1 atm. Using a spectrophotometer, the Y tristimulus value (i.e., the XYZ color space of the film) of the product film is measured and recorded. The Y tristimulus value is measured in three different areas of the product film over the black section of the opacity chart, and also in three different areas of the product film over the white section of the opacity chart.
The contrast ratio for the individual layers of the present invention, that is the contrast ratio for the first layer or the powder layer is less than about 20, preferably less than about 10, and even more preferably less than about 6.
The contrast ratio is calculated as the mathematical average of the three Y tristimulus values over the black areas, divided by the mathematical average of the three Y tristimulus values over the white areas, times 100:
The following examples further describe and demonstrate embodiments within the scope of the present invention. The examples are given solely for the purpose of illustration and are not to be construed as limitations of the present invention, as many variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The following 9 Examples are all treatment compositions of the present inventions. They can be applied by any of the methods and apparatuses described herein, preferably, they are applied via a thermal ink jet printer head and cartridge combination.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A using a homogenizer for mixing and sifting the Veegum into the water. Begin heating water to 75 C. Continue to mix for 20 min at 75 C. Then shut off heat. Combine phase B in a separate container and add to phase A with mixing while phase A cools. Add components of phase C one at a time to phase A/B while it continues to cool. When temperature reaches approximately 50 C, add phase D while continuing to mix. Mix for 2-3 minutes to ensure homogeneity then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A using a homogenizer for mixing and sifting the Veegum into the water. Begin heating water to 75 C. Continue to mix for 20 min at 75 C. Then shut off heat. Add components of phase B one at a time to phase A while it continues to cool. When temperature reaches approximately 50 C, add phase C while continuing to mix. Mix for 2-3 minutes to ensure homogeneity then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A using a homogenizer for mixing and sifting the Veegum into the water. Begin heating water to 75 C. Continue to mix for 20 min at 75 C. Then shut off heat. Add components of phase B one at a time to phase A while it continues to cool. When temperature reaches approximately 50 C, add phase C while continuing to mix. Mix for 2-3 minutes to ensure homogeneity then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A until uniform. Slowly add components of phase B one at a time with mixing. Add components of phase C one at a time using homogenizer to phase A/B to ensure uniformity and even dispersion. Mix for 2-3 minutes then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A using a homogenizer for mixing and sifting the Veegum into the water. Begin heating water to 75 C. Continue to mix for 20 min at 75 C. Then shut off heat. Combine phase B in a separate container and add to phase A with mixing while phase A cools. Add components of phase C one at a time to phase A/B while it continues to cool. When temperature reaches approximately 50 C, add phase D while continuing to mix. Mix for 2-3 minutes to ensure homogeneity then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A using a homogenizer for mixing and sifting the Veegum into the water. Begin heating water to 75 C. Continue to mix for 20 min at 75 C. Then shut off heat. Combine phase B in a separate container and add to phase A with mixing while phase A cools. Add components of phase C one at a time to phase A/B while it continues to cool. When temperature reaches approximately 50 C, add phase D while continuing to mix. Mix for 2-3 minutes to ensure homogeneity then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A using a homogenizer for mixing and sifting the Veegum into the water. Begin heating water to 75 C. Continue to mix for 20 min at 75 C. Then shut off heat. Combine phase B in a separate container and add to phase A with mixing while phase A cools. Add components of phase C one at a time to phase A/B while it continues to cool. When temperature reaches approximately 50 C, add phase D while continuing to mix. Mix for 2-3 minutes to ensure homogeneity then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A until uniform. Slowly add components of phase B one at a time with mixing. Add components of phase C one at a time using homogenizer to phase A/B to ensure uniformity and even dispersion. Mix for 2-3 minutes then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine ingredients of phase A using a homogenizer for mixing and sifting the Veegum into the water. Begin heating water to 75 C. Continue to mix for 20 min at 75 C. Then shut off heat. Combine phase B in a separate container and add to phase A with mixing while phase A cools. Add components of phase C one at a time to phase A/B while it continues to cool. When temperature reaches approximately 50 C, add phase D while continuing to mix. Mix for 2-3 minutes to ensure homogeneity then pour into container.
Treatment Composition
Combine the ingredients in phase A and mix until color is homogenous. Combine the ingredients in phase B and mix until the solid NaOH is thoroughly dissolved. Combine the ingredients in phase C using an overhead mixer to disperse the ingredients. Use a homogenizer to begin milling phase C and slowly adding phase A to phase C. Use phase D as a wash for the phase A container and add the wash to phase C. Mill for 10 minutes or until all ingredients are homogenous. Add phase B to the combined phases as the final addition. Mill and mix the combined phases until homogenous.
The following Example includes relatively large particles, and significantly reduced visible red tint.
Treatment Composition
Combine the components of phase A together using an overhead mixer until all ingredients are homogenous. Combine the ingredients of phase B together in a separate container with an overhead mixer until the solid NaOH is dissolved and all ingredients are homogenous. Add phase A to one injection chamber of a liquid whistle sonolator system and the other to the second injection chamber. These will serve as two streams of material to form the final product Simultaneously pump both phases into the liquid whistle at 2500 PSI with the internal blade set at a half turn. Collect final product that has reached the required pressure.
Referring now to
Skin deviations 101, 102, 103 and 104 are clear in
The consumer washes her face to remove the applied makeup after the photograph of
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
965322 | Peterson | Jul 1910 | A |
1131371 | Hatfield | Mar 1915 | A |
1302891 | Balthasar | May 1919 | A |
2278421 | Brown | Apr 1942 | A |
2361006 | Brown | Oct 1944 | A |
2740423 | Stillwagon | Apr 1956 | A |
2816729 | Jensen | Dec 1957 | A |
2882010 | Bryant | Apr 1959 | A |
2912218 | Stillwagon | Nov 1959 | A |
2936778 | Stillwagon | May 1960 | A |
2994342 | Stillwagon | Aug 1961 | A |
3024802 | Stillwagon | Mar 1962 | A |
3043557 | Stillwagon | Jul 1962 | A |
3051435 | Ramsey | Aug 1962 | A |
3072139 | Mosites | Jan 1963 | A |
3100500 | Stillwagon | Aug 1963 | A |
3127904 | Stillwagon | Apr 1964 | A |
3129920 | Stillwagon | Apr 1964 | A |
3156161 | Forsman et al. | Nov 1964 | A |
3173650 | Cotterman et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3186682 | Pierson et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3233861 | Stillwagon | Feb 1966 | A |
3241806 | Snell | Mar 1966 | A |
3253815 | Stillwagon | May 1966 | A |
3260496 | Borcherdt | Jul 1966 | A |
3269414 | Mayo | Aug 1966 | A |
3290001 | Taylor | Dec 1966 | A |
3298677 | Anderson | Jan 1967 | A |
3306316 | Stillwagon | Feb 1967 | A |
3314641 | Overbaugh | Apr 1967 | A |
3323641 | William | Jun 1967 | A |
3334650 | Lowery et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3346005 | Hanson | Oct 1967 | A |
3376015 | Forsman et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3452961 | Forsman | Jul 1969 | A |
3537683 | Snell | Nov 1970 | A |
D222641 | Rosa | Nov 1971 | S |
3656712 | Bertrem | Apr 1972 | A |
3677297 | Walton | Jul 1972 | A |
3680833 | McNeely, Jr. | Aug 1972 | A |
3778028 | Graves et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3837620 | Malloy et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3904173 | Naylor | Sep 1975 | A |
3960177 | Baumann | Jun 1976 | A |
3971229 | Privas | Jul 1976 | A |
D243720 | Yajima | Mar 1977 | S |
4014511 | Uno | Mar 1977 | A |
4025050 | Manki et al. | May 1977 | A |
4026514 | Sumner et al. | May 1977 | A |
4065979 | Killian | Jan 1978 | A |
4077673 | Takeshita et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4079746 | Killian | Mar 1978 | A |
4141537 | Daghe | Feb 1979 | A |
4275867 | Schils | Jun 1981 | A |
4289297 | Nakanishi | Sep 1981 | A |
4335738 | Nassir | Jun 1982 | A |
4399833 | Holtgraver | Aug 1983 | A |
4413393 | Schils | Nov 1983 | A |
4457490 | Scobie | Jul 1984 | A |
4465260 | Conley et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4496135 | Scobie | Jan 1985 | A |
4541612 | Yohner | Sep 1985 | A |
4570901 | Holtgraver | Feb 1986 | A |
4600508 | DeGhetto | Jul 1986 | A |
4685611 | Scobie et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4699357 | Sisk | Oct 1987 | A |
4711427 | Holtgraver | Dec 1987 | A |
4751938 | Kerns et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4773625 | Calvin | Sep 1988 | A |
4822001 | Sisk | Apr 1989 | A |
4846221 | Kanemaru | Jul 1989 | A |
D314209 | McClelland et al. | Jan 1991 | S |
5022426 | Fischer | Jun 1991 | A |
5110191 | Brown | May 1992 | A |
5160315 | Heinecke et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169029 | Behar et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5183391 | Fiedler | Feb 1993 | A |
5207411 | Sisk | May 1993 | A |
5293903 | Appelwick | Mar 1994 | A |
5308180 | Pournoor et al. | May 1994 | A |
D351190 | Oshima et al. | Oct 1994 | S |
5360030 | Sisk | Nov 1994 | A |
5614310 | Delgado et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5701927 | Hansen, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5893393 | Erdkamp et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5980210 | Tseng | Nov 1999 | A |
D425285 | Shinada et al. | May 2000 | S |
6139829 | Estrin | Oct 2000 | A |
D433752 | Saravia | Nov 2000 | S |
D434181 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2000 | S |
6180117 | Berthiaume et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6276658 | Austin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312124 | Desormeaux | Nov 2001 | B1 |
D454695 | Greene | Mar 2002 | S |
6386692 | Cowger et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6451329 | Sandewicz et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461467 | Blatchford et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6557819 | Austin | May 2003 | B2 |
D534582 | Tajima et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
D535326 | Chang | Jan 2007 | S |
D535688 | Tajima et al. | Jan 2007 | S |
7166279 | Law | Jan 2007 | B2 |
D537875 | Yamada | Mar 2007 | S |
D538335 | Chang | Mar 2007 | S |
D541850 | Steinmetz et al. | May 2007 | S |
D549279 | Steinmetz et al. | Aug 2007 | S |
D562451 | Braynin et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
D562452 | Iqbal | Feb 2008 | S |
D595407 | Braynin et al. | Jun 2009 | S |
D604843 | Braynin et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D608888 | Braynin et al. | Jan 2010 | S |
D621950 | Seki et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7841686 | Kyoshima | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7890152 | Edgar et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8007062 | Edgar et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8027505 | Edgar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D646396 | Seki et al. | Oct 2011 | S |
8184901 | Edgar et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
D662542 | Nagashima | Jun 2012 | S |
8231292 | Rabe et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8297738 | Kodama et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
D674485 | Flyash et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
D676959 | Flyash et al. | Feb 2013 | S |
D678783 | Wilcox et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
8633146 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8637442 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
D711538 | Youngquist et al. | Aug 2014 | S |
9007480 | Ciuc et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
D734479 | Youngquist et al. | Jul 2015 | S |
D750225 | Rabe et al. | Feb 2016 | S |
D750772 | Rabe et al. | Mar 2016 | S |
9522101 | Rabe et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
D791933 | Rabe et al. | Jul 2017 | S |
20010003357 | Bonomi | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010007677 | Nagatani et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020097283 | Askren et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030023235 | Cense et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030060810 | Syrowicz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040029981 | Herzig et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078278 | Dauga et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040175347 | Bissett | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186373 | Dunfield et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230258 | Altshuler et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050128262 | Studer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050276831 | Dihora et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060210513 | Luizzi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060253176 | Caruso et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265823 | Knopow et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275237 | Bissett | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070035815 | Edgar | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049832 | Edgar | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070148120 | Omura | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070224158 | Cassin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080058783 | Altshuler et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060665 | Umeno et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064813 | Schneider | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080194971 | Edgar | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219528 | Edgar | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080317539 | Brugger | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090025747 | Edgar | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090131922 | Dewey et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100065576 | Verheij | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100224205 | Mitra et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224209 | Rabe et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224210 | Rabe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224211 | Rabe et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100272766 | Vatter et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110040235 | Castel | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110155161 | Samain | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159283 | Ha et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159463 | Samain | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162673 | Samain et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110164264 | Silverbrook | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110270365 | Hamada et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120077725 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120113171 | Murata | May 2012 | A1 |
20130189332 | Breyfogle | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130289196 | Tanrikulu | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130292600 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296218 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345317 | Chiou | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140064821 | Price et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140163487 | Tout et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150030644 | Oh et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150059793 | Berlepsch et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150359315 | Rabe et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150359712 | Rabe et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150359714 | Rabe et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150360015 | Rabe et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160022006 | Rabe et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022008 | Rabe et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022009 | Rabe et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022010 | Rabe et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022011 | Rabe et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022972 | Rabe et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20170065996 | Burrowes et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013200395 | Feb 2013 | AU |
202004003148 | Mar 2005 | DE |
2314245 | Apr 2011 | EP |
002432773-0001 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2920076 | Aug 2007 | FR |
2933585 | Oct 2011 | FR |
2001314226 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003054007 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2006297691 | Nov 2006 | JP |
20080069730 | Jul 2008 | KR |
WO200201499 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO200160274 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO2008098234 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2008098235 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2008100878 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2008100880 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2009036876 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2010004526 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010004527 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010004528 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010004529 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010004530 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010004531 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010077703 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO2010083405 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO2013144186 | Oct 2013 | WO |
D085911-001 | Jun 2015 | WO |
D085910001 | Jun 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bioresources Com et al: “Peer-Reviewed Article Novel Use of Waste Keratin and Cotton Linter Fibers for Prototype Tissue Papers and Their Evaluation”, Bioresources, Jul. 26, 2010, pp. 1425-1435. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,257, filed Jul. 23, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,140, filed Jul. 23, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,198, filed Jul. 23, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,231, filed Jul. 23, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,297, filed Jul. 23, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,360, filed Jul. 23, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,534, filed Jun. 11, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,551, filed Jun. 11, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,563, filed Jun. 11, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,584, filed Jun. 11, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,507, filed Jun. 11, 2015. |
All Office Actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/349,073, filed Nov. 11, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/506,847, filed Oct. 21, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/506,852, filed Oct. 21, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/506,855, filed Oct. 21, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/506,858, filed Oct. 21, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/506,860, filed Oct. 21, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,507, filed Jun. 11, 2015, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,534, filed Jun. 11, 2015, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,551, filed Jun. 11, 2015, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,563, filed Jun. 11, 2015, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,584, filed Jun. 11, 2015, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/028,929, filed Jul. 25, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/028,935, filed Jul. 25, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/028,937, filed Jul. 25, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/028,944, filed Jul. 25, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/028,948, filed Jul. 25, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/028,951, filed Jul. 25, 2014, Thomas Elliot Rabe, et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150360016 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62011828 | Jun 2014 | US |