Patent Grant
12081817
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention relates generally to the field of optimizing the operation of a content delivery network such as for example a cable, Hybrid Fiber Copper (HFCu), or satellite network. More particularly, the present invention is in one exemplary aspect related to apparatus and methods for monitoring and optimizing delivery of programs including across a plurality of delivery platforms.
Recent advances in digital information processing and technology have made a whole range of services and functions available for delivery to consumers at various types devices for very reasonable prices or subscription fees. These services and functions include digital content or programming (movies, etc.), digital video-on-demand (VOD), personal video recorder (PVR) and networked PVR (nPVR), Internet Protocol television (IPTV), digital media playback and recording, as well high speed Internet access (including so-called “Internet TV”, where television programming is delivered over the Internet without QoS) and IP-based telephony (e.g., VoIP). Other services available to network users include access to, and recording of, digital music (e.g., MP3 files).
Currently, many of these services are provided to the user via a wide variety of different equipment environments and delivery paradigms including, inter alia, cable or satellite modems or QAMs, HFCu (i.e., Hybrid Fiber-copper distribution via indigenous POST/PSTN wiring in a premises), Wi-Fi™ hubs, Ethernet hubs, gateways, switches, and routers, to a plurality of user equipment types. For example, content may be delivered to users at set-top boxes, personal (desktop) computers, laptop computers, other mini-computers (such as so-called “netbooks”, mini-notebook computers), and/or other devices. Recent advances in consumer electronics have also led to the widespread introduction of a variety of portable media devices (PMDs) such as, inter alia, portable digital music devices such as the well known Apple Ipod™ and other so-called “MP3 players”, cellular telephones/smartphones, handheld computers, and personal digital assistants (PDA), which allow users to store and playback audio and video files.
Although a myriad of services, equipment, data formats and providers are available, current systems offer little to no interoperability or “intelligent” interrelationship between devices. The request for and playback of audio and video files from a first device is often limited to playback via the device itself. In other words, a user may utilize a device to only select delivery of audio and video files to be played back on that same device. Thus, if a user requests video content, the user is often limited to delivery of the requested content to that device. Further, the request messages are frequently determined by a specific protocol tied to the device or software that maybe incompatible with other device and software protocols thereby creating incompatibility issues. Current technology allows one device to browse the directory structure of other compatible devices (see, e.g., DLNA technology); however, there is no real intelligence or over-arching cognizance of the relationship of all of the devices associated with a given user or subscriber account, and their relationship to different types of content available over the various networks or delivery paradigms.
Nor is their any analysis of what devices or combinations of devices, encodings, etc. would give the user the best “experience” with respect to given content, including consideration of user-specific preferences. Rather, extant solutions are generally completely passive, and take no active role in evaluating, recommending, or selecting content formats, delivery modes or user platforms and translating multiprotocol message requests.
Therefore, what are needed are improved apparatus and methods for distributing content to a plurality of a user premises and PMD devices. Such improved apparatus and services would ideally, upon user request for content, provide users with recommendations for optimizing the user's experience and/or the network workload. For example, mechanisms would be provided to exploit the various features of the different ones of the user's available devices, as well as that user's delivery preferences.
Moreover, it would be desirable to permit the user to view their content anywhere (and on any device) they desire, at any given time, including the ability to transfer extant content “sessions” between different devices, the latter which may include heterogeneous hardware/software environments.
The present invention satisfies the foregoing needs by providing, inter alia, improved apparatus and methods for optimization and monitoring of content delivery, including monitoring and optimizing content delivery across a plurality of delivery platforms associated with a single user or premises.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method for providing content is disclosed. In one embodiment, the content delivery network comprises at least one content server, a protocol translation server, a database, and a plurality of client devices, and the method comprises: receiving a request for content from one of the plurality of client devices; determining a subscriber account to which the one client device issuing the request has been registered; identifying at least one other device in the database also registered to the subscriber account; and causing generation of a notification for display on the one requesting client device, the notification showing or listing the at least one other device.
In one variant, the identifying at least one other device comprises identifying the at least one other device based on its ability to suitably render the requested content.
In another variant, the identifying at least one other device comprises identifying the at least one other device based on its ability to suitably render the requested content better than the one client device.
In a further variant, the identifying at least one other device comprises identifying the at least one other device based on its current availability for display of the requested content. The identifying at least one other device comprises further identifying the at least one other device based on its ability to render the requested content better than the one client device.
In another variant, the protocol translation server accepts message from the client in the client native messaging protocol and translate the messaging to other protocols to bridge messaging between other clients, servers or other equipment in the delivery of content.
In another variant, if the determining indicates that the one requesting client device is not registered to a subscriber account, registering the client device to a subscriber account. The registration comprises e.g., receiving information identifying the client device and the subscriber account; associating the client device to the subscriber account; and storing the association in the database. The information identifying the client device comprises at least one of a MAC address and/or an IP address, and the information identifying the subscriber account comprises at least one of an account number and a login-password combination.
In yet another variant, the act of determining comprises utilizing a cryptographic hash of a piece of information uniquely identifying the one requesting client device, and matching this to a corresponding hash within the database.
In still another variant, the notification is further configured to enable a user of the requesting client device to select one or more of the at least one other devices for delivery of content thereto.
In yet another variant, the method further comprises: generating a graphical display having representations of at least the one client device and the at least one other device; and allowing the user to select at least one of the devices via the display.
In a second aspect of the invention, apparatus for use in a content delivery network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises: a network interface configured to communicate with a plurality of network entities; a storage apparatus; and a digital processor configured to run at least one computer program thereon. When executed, the computer program: monitors content requests from a plurality of user devices, each content request comprising information identifying an individual one of the plurality of user devices; identifies a subscriber account associated with the individual user device; identifies a plurality of additional user devices also associated with the identified subscriber account; and generates a notification message to send to the individual user device, the notification messages presenting a user of the individual user device with one or more options for delivery of the requested content to the plurality of identified additional devices.
In one variant, the content delivery network comprises a cable television network having at least one content distribution server configured to service the content requests, the content distribution server being in data communication with the apparatus via the network interface.
In another variant, the storage apparatus is in communication with the processor and configured to store a plurality of records, the records identifying a plurality of subscriber accounts and at least one user device associated with each. The plurality of records are updated based at least in part on information received from e.g., a billing entity of the network, and/or information received from the user devices.
In yet another variant, the content requests comprise SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) requests, and the plurality of user devices comprise IP-enabled client devices adapted to support the SIP protocol.
In a further variant, the plurality of identified additional devices are listed in the notification message according to a hierarchy, the hierarchy being determined based on one or more criteria. The criteria comprise e.g., at least: (i) device capabilities; and (ii) user preferences.
In a third aspect of the invention, a method of providing content to a plurality of client devices is disclosed. In one embodiment, the devices are each registered to a subscriber account, and the method comprises: receiving a request for content from a first one of the plurality of client devices; determining a subscriber account to which the requesting client device is registered; identifying a second one of the plurality of client devices also registered to the subscriber account; and generating a notification for display on the first and the second client devices, the notification enabling a user of the first and the second client devices to select delivery of content at one or more of the first and the second client devices.
In one variant, the request comprises at least information uniquely identifying the first client device (e.g., IP address or a MAC address).
In another variant, the act of determining the subscriber account comprises querying a database using at least the information uniquely identifying the first client device, the database comprising an association of each of the plurality of client devices to a subscriber account; and the act of identifying the second client device comprises extracting the association from the database.
In yet another variant, the request comprises at least information identifying the subscriber account; e.g., at least one of: (i) an account number, and (ii) a log-in and password combination. Information is extracted from the request, and the act of identifying the second client devices comprises querying a database using at least the information identifying the subscriber account, the database comprising an association of each of the plurality of client devices to a subscriber account.
In still another variant, the notification is configured to enable a user of the first and the second client devices to select delivery of content at only those of the first and the second client devices having one more desired characteristics.
In a fourth aspect of the invention, a computer readable apparatus is disclosed. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises a medium adapted to store a computer program for the optimized delivery of content in a network, the computer program comprising instructions which, when executed: determine an association between a plurality of client devices to a single subscriber account; obtain content requests, one of the content requests relating to a request for content at a first one of the plurality of client devices; evaluate one or more aspects of the plurality of client devices; based on the evaluation, selects one or more of the plurality client devices as delivery platforms for the requested content; and present information regarding the selected one or more client devices to a user of the first client device.
In one variant, the computer program is further configured to receive a user selection of at least one of the selected client devices for delivery of the requested content.
In another variant, the content requests are forwarded from at least one content distribution server.
In yet another variant, the presentation of information regarding the selected client devices includes the first client device, and comprises a notification or message sent to at least the first client device for display on a display device associated therewith.
In a further variant, the one or more aspects comprise at least one of: device capabilities; user preferences; and bandwidth requirements.
In yet another variant, the selection of one or more of the plurality client devices as delivery platforms for the requested content comprises selection based at least in part on providing a higher video picture quality than that available with the first one of the client devices.
In a further variant, the selection of one or more of the plurality client devices as delivery platforms for the requested content comprises selection based at least in part on providing a higher quality audio experience than that available with the first one of the client devices.
In a fifth aspect of the invention, headend apparatus for use in a content delivery network is disclosed. In one embodiment, the network comprises at least one content server and a database comprising a plurality of records associating each of a plurality of user devices to subscriber accounts, and the apparatus comprises: a network interface configured to receive content requests directly or indirectly from the plurality of user devices; a storage apparatus; and a digital processor configured to run at least one computer program thereon and configured to, when executed: examine the content requests to identify subscriber accounts associated with each request; query the database to identify a plurality of user devices associated with a particular one of the subscriber accounts of a particular one of the content requests; evaluate one or more aspects of the identified plurality of user devices; based at least in part on the evaluation, select one or more of the plurality of identified user devices as delivery platforms for the requested content; and present the selected one or more of the plurality of identified user devices to a user.
In a sixth aspect of the invention, a method of operating a content delivery apparatus is disclosed. In one embodiment, the method comprises: establishing a communication session between a content source and a first recipient device using a session-based protocol adapted for use on a packet-switched network; transferring packetized content to the first recipient device within the session; establishing a communication session between the content source and a second recipient device; and switching delivery of the packetized content to the second recipient device from the first device.
In one variant, the content source comprises an IP TV (Internet Protocol television) server disposed within a content delivery network.
In another variant, the content delivery network comprises a Hybrid Fiber coaxial (HFC) cable television network, and the packetized content is delivered according to a unicast session over the HFC network via one or more QAM channels.
In yet another variant, the communication session established between the content source and the first recipient device, and the communication session established between the content source and the second recipient device, comprise the same communication session.
In a further variant, the method further comprises: associating the first recipient device and the second recipient device within a database of a network operator; and based at least in part on the association, notifying a user of the first recipient device that the second recipient device is available for receipt of the packetized content.
In another variant, the switching delivery of the packetized content to the second recipient device from the first device comprises the following steps, performed substantially and without further user intervention: suspending display of the packetized content on the first recipient device or a display device associated therewith; recording, on premises recording device, a portion of the packetized content delivered during the suspension; resuming the display of the packetized content on the second recipient device or a display device associated therewith at a later time; and giving the user the option to resume display of the packetized content starting with the recorded portion.
In another variant, the switching delivery of the packetized content to the second recipient device from the first device comprises the following steps, performed substantially and without further user intervention: suspending display of the packetized content on the first recipient device or a display device associated therewith, the suspending comprising suspending delivery of the packetized content to a premises where the first recipient is located; resuming the display of the packetized content on the second recipient device or a display device associated therewith at a later time, the resuming comprising resuming delivery of the packetized content substantially at the point within the packetized content where the suspending was invoked.
In yet another variant, if the content is real-time streaming, streaming to the second device begins as soon as possible after streaming to the first device ceases. This may be useful for example, in cases where licensing requires that only one endpoint is active at a given instant or only one session may exist at a time.
In another variant, the user may be able to manually configure a media device that is not capable of automatic negotiation via an interface.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will immediately be recognized by persons of ordinary skill in the art with reference to the attached drawings and detailed description of exemplary embodiments as given below.
Reference is now made to the drawings wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
As used herein, the term “application” refers generally to a unit of executable software that implements a certain functionality or theme. The themes of applications vary broadly across any number of disciplines and functions (such as on-demand content management, e-commerce transactions, brokerage transactions, home entertainment, calculator etc.), and one application may have more than one theme. The unit of executable software generally runs in a predetermined environment; for example, the unit could comprise a downloadable Java Xlet™ that runs within the JavaTV™ environment.
As used herein, the term “computer program” or “software” is meant to include any sequence or human or machine cognizable steps which perform a function. Such program may be rendered in virtually any programming language or environment including, for example, C/C++, Fortran, COBOL, PASCAL, assembly language, markup languages (e.g., HTML, SGML, XML, VoXML), and the like, as well as object-oriented environments such as the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA), Java™ (including J2ME, Java Beans, etc.), Binary Runtime Environment (e.g., BREW), and the like.
The terms “Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)” refer to any type of electronic equipment located within a customer's or user's premises and connected to a network, including devices having access to digital television content via a satellite, cable, or terrestrial network. The term “customer premises equipment” (CPE) includes such electronic equipment such as set-top boxes (e.g., DSTBs), televisions, cable modems (CMs), embedded multimedia terminal adapters (eMTAs), whether stand-alone or integrated with other devices, Digital Video Recorders (DVR), gateway storage devices (e.g., Furnace), and ITV Personal Computers.
As used herein, the term “display” means any type of device adapted to display information, including without limitation: CRTs, LCDs, TFTs, plasma displays, LEDs, incandescent and fluorescent devices. Display devices may also include less dynamic devices such as, for example, printers, e-ink devices, and the like.
As used herein, the term “DOCSIS” refers to any of the existing or planned variants of the Data Over Cable Services Interface Specification, including for example DOCSIS versions 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0. DOCSIS (version 1.0) is a standard and protocol for internet access using a “digital” cable network.
As used herein, the term “DVR” (digital video recorder) refers generally to any type of recording mechanism and/or software environment, located in the headend, the user premises or anywhere else, whereby content sent over a network can be recorded and selectively recalled. Such DVR may be dedicated in nature, or part of a non-dedicated or multi-function system.
As used herein, the term “headend” refers generally to a networked system controlled by an operator (e.g., an MSO or multiple systems operator) that distributes programming to MSO clientele using client devices. Such programming may include literally any information source/receiver including, inter alia, free-to-air TV channels, pay TV channels, interactive TV, and the Internet.
As used herein, the terms “Internet” and “internet” are used interchangeably to refer to inter-networks including, without limitation, the Internet.
As used herein, the term “memory” includes any type of integrated circuit or other storage device adapted for storing digital data including, without limitation, ROM. PROM, EEPROM, DRAM, SDRAM, DDR/2 SDRAM, EDO/FPMS, RLDRAM, SRAM, “flash” memory (e.g., NAND/NOR), and PSRAM.
As used herein, the terms “microprocessor” and “digital processor” are meant generally to include all types of digital processing devices including, without limitation, digital signal processors (DSPs), reduced instruction set computers (RISC), general-purpose (CISC) processors, microprocessors, gate arrays (e.g., FPGAs), PLDs, reconfigurable compute fabrics (RCFs), array processors, secure microprocessors, and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Such digital processors may be contained on a single unitary IC die, or distributed across multiple components.
As used herein, the terms “MSO” or “multiple systems operator” refer to a cable, fiber to the home (FTTH), fiber to the curb (FTTC), satellite, or terrestrial network provider having infrastructure required to deliver services including programming and data over those mediums.
As used herein, the terms “network” and “bearer network” refer generally to any type of telecommunications or data network including, without limitation, hybrid fiber coax (HFC) networks, satellite networks, telco networks, and data networks (including MANs, WANs, LANs, WLANs, internets, and intranets). Such networks or portions thereof may utilize any one or more different topologies (e.g., ring, bus, star, loop, etc.), transmission media (e.g., wired/RF cable, RF wireless, millimeter wave, optical, etc.) and/or communications or networking protocols (e.g., SONET, DOCSIS, IEEE Std. 802.3, ATM, X.25, Frame Relay, 3GPP, 3GPP2, WAP, SIP, UDP, FTP, RTP/RTCP, H.323, etc.).
As used herein, the term “network interface” refers to any signal, data, or software interface with a component, network or process including, without limitation, those of the FireWire (e.g., FW400, FW800, etc.), USB (e.g., USB2), Ethernet (e.g., 10/100, 10/100/1000 (Gigabit Ethernet), 10-Gig-E, etc.), MoCA, Serial ATA (e.g., SATA, e-SATA, SATAII), Ultra-ATA/DMA, Coaxsys (e.g., TVnet™), radio frequency tuner (e.g., in-band or OOB, cable modem, etc.), Wi-Fi (802.11a,b,g,n), WiMAX (802.16), PAN (802.15), or IrDA families.
As used herein, the term “QAM” refers to modulation schemes used for sending signals over cable networks. Such modulation scheme might use any constellation level (e.g. QPSK, QAM-16, QAM-64, QAM-256 etc.) depending on details of a cable network. A QAM may also refer to a physical channel modulated according to the schemes.
As used herein, the term “server” refers to any computerized component, system or entity regardless of form which is adapted to provide data, files, applications, content, or other services to one or more other devices or entities on a computer network.
As used herein, the term “service”, “content”, “program” and “stream” are sometimes used synonymously to refer to a sequence of packetized data that is provided in what a subscriber may perceive as a service. A “service” (or “content”, or “stream”) in the former, specialized sense may correspond to different types of services in the latter, non-technical sense. For example, a “service” in the specialized sense may correspond to, among others, video broadcast, audio-only broadcast, pay-per-view, or video-on-demand. The perceivable content provided on such a “service” may be live, pre-recorded, delimited in time, undelimited in time, or of other descriptions. In some cases, a “service” in the specialized sense may correspond to what a subscriber would perceive as a “channel” in traditional broadcast television.
As used herein, the term “storage device” refers to without limitation computer hard drives, DVR device, memory, RAID devices or arrays, optical media (e.g., CD-ROMs, Laserdiscs, Blu-Ray, etc.), or any other devices or media capable of storing content or other information.
As used herein, the term “user interface” refers to, without limitation, any visual, graphical, tactile, audible, sensory, or other means of providing information to and/or receiving information from a user or other entity.
As used herein, the term “Wi-Fi” refers to, without limitation, any of the variants of IEEE-Std. 802.11 or related standards including 802.11 a/b/g/n.
As used herein, the term “wireless” means any wireless signal, data, communication, or other interface including without limitation Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 3G, HSDPA/HSUPA, TDMA, CDMA (e.g., IS-95A, WCDMA, etc.), FHSS, DSSS, GSM, PAN/802.15, WiMAX (802.16), 802.20, narrowband/FDMA, OFDM, PCS/DCS, analog cellular, CDPD, satellite systems, millimeter wave or microwave systems, acoustic, and infrared (i.e., IrDA).
Overview
The present invention discloses, inter alia, methods and apparatus for optimizing content delivery to multiple user devices. One salient functionality of the present invention is to provide the user (e.g., a subscriber of am IP, cable or satellite network) with the best possible “user experience” at all times, depending on the various hardware/software environments they have available to them, and their current usage needs and preferences.
In one embodiment, an optimization and monitoring entity (OME) is utilized in conjunction with other network and user premises components to provide the aforementioned functionality. The OME comprises one or more software applications which work in conjunction with one another (and with one or more content servers) to determine, evaluate, and provide notification to a user of one or more alternative content delivery platforms, such as for example when a request for content is received. Alternative services, transports, and delivery models, may also be recommended in another variant of the invention.
In one exemplary use case, requests for content are received at a content server, and forwarded to the OME. The content server may satisfy the request, or may first require selection of a delivery platform. Information identifying the requesting device (such as IP address, MAC address, etc.) and/or the subscriber account or specific user (such as account number, physical address, login/password information, etc.) is derived from or embedded in the content requests (or otherwise retrieved from information contained within the request). The OME uses the collected information to determine whether the requesting device is registered to a known user account by comparing the identification to a database of registered accounts and devices. The OME uses the aforementioned database to compile a list of all of the other known client devices in a specific user's account. Software applications running on the OME further differentiate the various features and capabilities of the different types of client devices registered to a user account and which may be used to receive content. In one variant, the OME comprises a “recommendation engine” that determines whether requested content may be provided to the same user on a different platform; e.g., on a different one of the client devices associated with the user's account. Such an alternative device may be recommended based on e.g., video/audio quality, picture size, bandwidth availability, and/or any other additional capabilities of the recommended client device, or may be recommended based on historical usage or other information about the user (or a specification of user preferences associated with the account and accessed by the OME).
In one implementation, a list of the alternative delivery platforms and/or modes is presented to a user via a notification generated by the OME (or generated by the CPE after being triggered by the OME). The notifications sent to the client device(s) indicate which, if any, of the user's other devices may receive the content alternatively (or in addition to) the content being received at the requesting device. The notifications generated/triggered by the OME may, in one embodiment, be interactive in nature and provide a user the ability to select one or more of the presented content delivery platforms, as well as features or configurations associated therewith.
The client devices requesting content and/or being recommended for the delivery of content may include, inter alia, consumer premises devices (CPE) 106 (such as digital set top boxes (STB), IPTV devices, media bridges (MB), converged premises devices (CPD), etc.), personal video recorders (PVR), digital video recorders (DVR), network DVR, computer devices (such as personal computers (PC) and laptop computers), and mobile devices (including personal media devices (PMD) and mobile telephones). In one variant of the invention (so-called “chain mode”), the recommendation engine evaluates two or more communicating client devices along a “rendering path” to determine the ultimate delivery configuration to the user (e.g., to prevent instances where the first device encountered in the chain provides the recommendation engine with a false representation of the quality of the entire rendering chain of devices).
In another aspect of the invention, a centralized control device is disclosed which permits the transfer or migration of content delivery sessions (e.g., SIP-based IPTV sessions or the like) between two or more devices. In one implementation, the user's premises gateway or DSTB or PC is used as the host device for a user interface which shows the various premises (and “off-net”) devices associated with the user/subscriber account, and their interconnectivity. GUI functionality (e.g., a multi-touch-screen GUI, drag-and-drop, speech recognition application, or other interface/input device) allows the user to rapidly designate particular devices for communication and establishment of a session/delivery of content, and/or transfer existing communication sessions between capable devices (such as may be determined by the OME recommendation engine).
Methods for utilization of the foregoing functionality, and a business rules engine for directing or adjusting the use of the optimization process, are also described herein.
Exemplary embodiments of the apparatus and methods of the present invention are now described in detail. While these exemplary embodiments are described in the context of the aforementioned hybrid fiber coax (HFC) cable system architecture having an multiple systems operator (MSO), digital networking capability, and plurality of client devices, the general principles and advantages of the invention may be extended to other types of networks and architectures, whether broadband, narrowband, wired or wireless, or otherwise, the following therefore being merely exemplary in nature. For example, a satellite receiver and delivery network, or alternatively an IP-based delivery network may be utilized. A WiMAX (IEEE Std. 802.16) broadband delivery network or transport could also be utilized. Hence, the optimization techniques discussed herein are largely agnostic to the delivery network used to provide content, as described in greater detail below.
It will also be appreciated that while described generally in the context of a consumer (i.e., home) end user domain or premises, the present invention may be readily adapted to other types of environments (e.g., commercial/enterprise, government/military, healthcare facility, etc.) as well. Myriad other applications are possible.
It is further noted that while described primarily in the context of a cable delivery system with 6 MHz RF channels, the present invention is applicable to literally any network topology or paradigm, and any frequency/bandwidth, such as for example 8 MHz channels. Furthermore, as referenced above, the invention is in no way limited to traditional cable system frequencies (i.e., below 1 GHZ), and in fact may be used with systems that operate above 1 GHz band in center frequency or bandwidth, to include without limitation so-called ultra-wideband systems.
Also, while certain aspects are described primarily in the context of the well-known IP or Internet Protocol (described in, inter alia, RFC 791 and 2460), it will be appreciated that the present invention may utilize other types of protocols (and in fact bearer networks to include other internets and intranets) to implement the described functionality.
In a further embodiment, if the content is real-time streaming, streaming to the second device may begin as soon as possible after streaming to the first device ceases. This may be useful in cases where licensing requires that only one endpoint is active at a given instant.
In another aspect, a web portal like interface may provide an option to manually configure a media device that is not capable of automatic negotiation. This may be done by a user selecting a device class from a menu, then a manufacturer, then a model type and version. This interaction then indicates that the device is accepted or supported and streaming commences.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will immediately be recognized by persons of ordinary skill in the art with reference to the attached drawings and detailed description of exemplary embodiments as given below.
Network—
The data/application origination point 102 comprises any medium that allows data and/or applications (such as a VOD-based or “Watch TV” application) to be transferred to a distribution server 104. This can include for example a third party data source, application vendor website, CD-ROM, external network interface, mass storage device (e.g., RAID system), etc. Such transference may be automatic, initiated upon the occurrence of one or more specified events (such as the receipt of a request packet or ACK), performed manually, or accomplished in any number of other modes readily recognized by those of ordinary skill.
The application distribution server 104 comprises a computer system where such applications can enter the network system. Distribution servers are well known in the networking arts, and accordingly not described further herein.
The VOD server 105 comprises a computer system where on-demand content can be received from one or more of the aforementioned data sources 102 and enter the network system. These servers may generate the content locally, or alternatively act as a gateway or intermediary from a distant source.
The CPE 106 includes any equipment in the “customers' premises” (or other locations, whether local or remote to the distribution server 104) that can be accessed by a distribution server 104. As will be discussed in greater detail below, other consumer devices may be utilized in conjunction with or in lieu of the CPE 106. Also discussed below, the CPE 106 of
Referring now to
The architecture 150 of
Content (e.g., audio, video, data, files, etc.) is provided in each downstream (in-band) channel associated with the relevant service group. To communicate with the headend or intermediary node (e.g., hub server), the CPE 106 may use the out-of-band (OOB) or DOCSIS channels and associated protocols. The OCAP 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 (and subsequent) specification provides for exemplary networking protocols both downstream and upstream, although the invention is in no way limited to these approaches.
It will also be recognized that the multiple servers (broadcast, VOD, or otherwise) can be used, and disposed at two or more different locations if desired, such as being part of different server “farms”. These multiple servers can be used to feed one service group, or alternatively different service groups. In a simple architecture, a single server is used to feed one or more service groups. In another variant, multiple servers located at the same location are used to feed one or more service groups. In yet another variant, multiple servers disposed at different location are used to feed one or more service groups.
“Switched” Networks—
Switching architectures allow improved efficiency of bandwidth use for ordinary digital broadcast programs. Ideally, the subscriber is unaware of any difference between programs delivered using a switched network and ordinary streaming broadcast delivery.
Co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/956,688 filed on Sep. 20, 2001 and entitled “Technique for Effectively Providing Program Material in a Cable Television System”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,713,623 on Apr. 29, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describes one exemplary broadcast switched digital architecture useful with the present invention, although it will be recognized by those of ordinary skill that other approaches and architectures may be substituted.
In addition to “broadcast” content (e.g., video programming), the systems of
Referring again to
The edge switch 194 forwards the packets receive from the CMTS 199 to the QAM modulator 189, which transmits the packets on one or more physical (QAM-modulated RF) channels to the CPE. The IP packets are typically transmitted on RF channels that are different that the RF channels used for the broadcast video and audio programming (e.g., DOCSIS QAMs), although this is not a requirement. The CPE 106 are each configured to monitor the particular assigned RF channel (such as via a port or socket ID/address, or other such mechanism) for IP packets intended for the subscriber premises/address that they serve.
“Packetized” Networks—
While the foregoing network architectures described herein can (and in fact do) carry packetized content (e.g., IP over MPEG for high-speed data or Internet TV, MPEG2 packet content over QAM for MPTS, etc.), they are often not optimized for such delivery. Hence, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a “packet optimized” delivery network is used for carriage of the packet content (e.g., IPTV content).
Optimization Network Architecture—
Referring now to
As shown, the network of
Generally, the BPS 204 is responsible for sending or controlling delivery of content to the various client devices 206. It is noted that the client devices 206 discussed herein may include, inter alia, consumer premises devices (CPE) 106 (such as set top boxes (STBs), IPTV enabled DSTBs, media bridges (MBs), converged premises devices (CPDs), etc.), personal video recorders (PVR), digital video recorders (DVRs), network DVR, computer devices (such as personal computers (PCs) and laptop computers), and mobile devices (including personal mobile devices (PMDs) and mobile telephones). The client devices 206 may comprise any number and type of apparatus for the delivery of data and/or content to a user, the foregoing being merely illustrative. Individual ones of these client devices 206 will be discussed in greater detail below with respect to
It is further noted that throughout the present disclosure, each of the above-described devices (including the PMD 212, PC 214, STB 222, DVR 226, display device 224, CPE 106, and CPD 208 of
The network illustrated at
The BPS 204 may be used to collectively refer to one or more of the headend 150 entities discussed above with respect to
In one embodiment, content is provided to the client devices 206 directly via the server 201 of the BPS 204; e.g., as an IP packet stream or via a SIP session. In another embodiment, the BPS 204 merely directs other content delivery processes or entities to deliver content to the CPE 206.
In the illustrated embodiment, the server 201 receives content requests from various ones of the client devices 206 and, only after it is determined that the requesting client device 206 is “entitled” to receive the content, the server 201 provides (or causes the provision of) the content thereto. The determination of whether a device is “entitled” to receive content is accomplished using any number of different mechanisms; see, e.g., the methods and apparatus disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/536,724 filed on Aug. 6, 2009 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING ENTITLEMENTS TO DATA OVER A NETWORK”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,341,242 on Dec. 25, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As discussed therein, a request for content is received from the client device 206 at the server entity 201 of BPS 204. An entity at the BPS 204 (such as the OME 200, the server 201, or another entity) obtains information identifying the user account (such as subscriber identification number, account number, device ID such as MAC address or IP address, etc.), and uses this information to request entitlements from an entitlements server (not shown) located elsewhere at the headend 150. Based on the results returned from the entitlements server, the BPS 204 will either grant or deny the request. The entitlements server accesses subscription information in a subscriber and device database 250 to obtain sufficient information to determine the entitlements of the subscriber. In one implementation, the content server 201 or OME 200 may include the functionality of the aforementioned entitlements server therein.
In one embodiment, the server 201 of
The OME 200 may comprise one or more software applications which, inter alia, monitor content requests received at the content server 201 of the BPS 202. A copy of each of the content requests received at the content server 201 is forwarded to the OME 200 (e.g., via inter-process message, or other communications link between the two processes). The content requests include information identifying the requesting device 206 (such as IP address, MAC address, TUNER_ID, etc.). The content request may further identify the subscriber account, such as account number, subscriber address, or by a user entered login password combination, etc., although it will be appreciated that only one piece of device-or account/subscriber-specific information is required to initiate the optimization process. In other words, a content request may be made by a subscriber subsequent to, or in conjunction with, logging or signing in (such as via their on-screen display, to a website or other service, etc.). As will be described in greater detail below, the OME in other embodiments may function to optimize user delivery platforms and/or mode on a “passive” or unsolicited bases (e.g., periodically, or not upon any particular user content request or other action).
The OME 200 determines, based on the unique identification of the requesting device 206 and/or information regarding the subscriber account, whether the device 206 is registered to a known user account by comparing the identification to a database 250 of registered accounts and devices. As will be discussed below, the database 250 includes a plurality of records associating one or more devices to individual user accounts.
Software applications running on the OME 200 (discussed below) differentiate and evaluate the various features and capabilities of the different types of client devices 206 which may be used to request and receive content for that account.
The OME 200 software application's evaluation of the above-disclosed information determines (i) whether requested content may be provided to the same user on different platforms; e.g., on one or more other client devices 206 associated with the user's account, and (ii) recommends delivery at ones of these devices to the user. This process is generally conducted with respect to an optimization goal or strategy (or according to a prescribed rule set), such as maximizing “user experience”. As used herein, the term “user experience” generally refers without limitation to the quality and/or level of satisfaction that a user obtains from viewing or experiencing the content. However, other optimization goals/rule sets may be employed, such as for example maximization of profit or revenue for the MSO (or advertisers or content providers), bandwidth conservation, and so forth.
In one exemplary implementation of the aforementioned “user experience” optimization, a client device 206 may be recommended to the user based on e.g., video/audio quality (e.g., SD versus HD or up-converted SD capability), picture size, bandwidth availability or capability (e.g., broadband versus narrowband data delivery), and/or any other additional capabilities of the recommended client device 206, as will be discussed if further detail below.
The recommended devices 206 are in one embodiment presented to the user in a notification message, on-screen display window, icon, etc. which enables the user to select one or more devices for delivery. In an alternative embodiment, the notification may include all devices irrespective of any evaluation/recommendation (or, with the recommended devices annotated or highlighted within the complete list). A priority order (e.g., best-to-worst option ranking) or similar function may also be provided.
In yet another embodiment, the OME 200 may comprise the functionality and storage capability disclosed above as being attributed to the database 250.
In the example illustrated in
The CPD 208 of
Also illustrated at
In yet another embodiment, the client device 206 may comprise a personal video encoder (PVE) or comparable device (not shown). For example, the “Slingbox” device manufactured by Sling Media of San Mateo, CA is one such exemplary device which is capable of enabling a user to watch TV programming from various locations via an Internet-connected PC or similar device. The device is generally connected between the subscriber's cable/satellite video drop and DSTB (or other device), and has a TV tuner inside. The user tunes to a given channel, and the PVE encodes the video streamed over the cable/satellite in Windows Media or similar format. The encoded content is streamed to a client application on a Windows XP-based or similar PC via an IP network such as the Internet, and hence the user can view the data locally (i.e., at the same premises) or remotely so long as they have access to the IP distribution network. This functionality can be made part of a separate physical component, or alternatively have some or all of its functionality disposed within the PVE itself. It may also be integrated with other devices (such as connected CPE 106 or PMDs 212). It will be appreciated that the PVE may also be configured to receive other device recommendations and may be recommended as a platform alternative for other devices as discussed above.
In the context of the exemplary architecture of
Suppose now that the user uses the PC 214 to request “IP TV” content (i.e., IP protocol packetized video content); this request is forwarded through the network 101 to the OME 200. As the requested content is prepared for transmission to the requesting device (i.e., PC 214) via the content server 201, the OME 200 determines the subscriber account associated with the request and determines whether any other devices in the subscriber's account should be recommended as alternate delivery platforms. In the present example, the OME 200 will determine that the user of the PC 214 is also associated with the IP-enabled DSTB 222 (here, in communication with both a DVR 224 and display device 226). In one embodiment, the OME 200 will provide the user of the PC 214 a message or display notification indicating that the IPTV content is available for viewing at the display device 226 and/or delivery to the DVR 224. Alternatively, the notification may be reserved only for those instances where an evaluation of the both the PC 214 and the DSTB 222 (including display 210 and/or DVR 212 options associated therewith) reveals that, based on the capabilities of these devices, there is some advantage in providing the content to the user on these devices 222, 210, 212. For example, the OME 200 may evaluate the PC 214 (e.g., based on device profiles maintained at the headend/OME, or via profiles obtained from the device themselves upon request) and DSTB 222 and determine that, based on picture and sound quality available at the display device 226 and/or based on the convenience associated with the DVR 224, it is more desirable for the user to view and/or record the live broadcast programming content at the display device 226 or DVR 224 rather than (or simultaneous to) viewing at the PC 214.
Referring now to
As is also illustrated, a user's PC 214 may directly access internet content from the internet content server 228 via the IP network. Still further, a user may access internet content at a PMD 212 via a base station 230 in communication and connected to the internet content server 228 via both the IP network and a cellular service provider (CSP) network and interface.
Content delivery controlled by the server 201 to one or more PMD 212 may occur via the methods and apparatus discussed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/258,229 entitled “Method and Apparatus For On-Demand Content Transmission and Control Over Networks” filed Oct. 24, 2005, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As discussed therein, content may be delivered on-demand to the PMD 212 via a “point-to-point” approach, wherein a session is established between a content receiving entity (such as a PMD 212) and a distributing entity (e.g., server 201). In one variant, session establishment and data flow control are advantageously implemented using protocols and bandwidth that are typically used for (i) providing on-demand services to subscribers within the cable network, and (ii) delivery and control of streaming multimedia to client mobile devices. Thus, information regarding distribution of content to various PMD 212 as well as other information regarding the user's activities with respect to the content (such as stopping, restarting, fast forwarding, etc.) may be collected at a server entity 201 of the headend 150, via the associated IP gateway and cellular service provider, and processed to (AMDR) messages, which are stored and/or analyzed.
Hence any of the PMD 212, PC 214 and CPD 208 of
It should be noted that the embodiments described herein of the premises network topology shown in
Referring now to
The use account records 252 are linked to one or more client devices 206 which are each identified in the database 250 by a device identifier 254. In one embodiment, the device identifier 254 may comprise a MAC address, IP address, TUNER_ID, or other unique device identifier. The user account records 252 may further comprise information relating to a login and password combination used by a user to verify the user as being associated with that account. The device identification records 254 are updated via messages received from the billing system 204, or another entity (such as an MSO server used to service subscriber logins and account changes performed over the Internet). In this manner, only current devices and current subscription information is kept in the database 250 and used for recommending delivery platforms.
Each device 206 may be optionally associated with a device description file 256. The device description file 256 describes the features and capabilities of the devices 206 within a user's account, such as for example configuration information. This configuration information might include e.g., (i) type and version of operating system; (ii) type and version of codecs installed (e.g., H.264, MPEG, Real, WMP, etc.); (iii) memory and/or mass storage device capacity; (iv) display type and resolution (e.g., 1080p); (v) communications interfaces/protocols (e.g., USB, IEEE-Std. 1394, Ethernet, UPnP, Wi-Fi, WiMAX, DOCSIS, etc.); and (vi) capabilities/function support (e.g., DRM, DNLA, DCAS). The device description file 256 may be derived by the OME 200 and/or the billing system 204 based on the device identification (see below). Alternatively, the devices 206 themselves may be configured to provide capabilities information in the form of a description file 256 or message (as will be discussed further below).
In another embodiment, the network architecture described in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/256,903 entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PACKETIZED CONTENT DELIVERY OVER A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK” previously incorporated herein, may be utilized in conjunction with or as an alternative to the architecture discussed above with respect to
Methodology—
Referring now to
Per step 302 of the method 300, content is requested by one or more CPE 106. The content request is received at the server entity 201 of the BPS 202 and a copy of the request is forwarded to the OME 200. The content request may constitute for example an on-demand request (e.g., VoD or the like), PPV request, IPTV delivery session establishment (e.g., via SIP session), request for an application download (e.g., a gaming application from a carousel or other location), accessing and requesting download from an Internet website or server location, or request for an EPG or content directory.
In one embodiment, the requested content may be immediately provided to the requesting device by the server 201, provided the requesting device is entitled to receive the content. For instance, information within the content request identifying the device (such as by IP address or MAC address) and/or the subscriber account (such as by subscriber account number or other subscriber identification) may be used to determine the entitlement of the requesting device to receive the content. The methods and apparatus disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/536,724 filed on Aug. 6, 2009 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING ENTITLEMENTS TO DATA OVER A NETWORK” previously incorporated herein, may be utilized to determine content access entitlements. Alternatively, the requested content may only be delivered to an entitled requesting device once the user has selected a delivery option from among the recommended options, as discussed below.
Per step 304, the OME 200 uses information contained in the content request (information identifying the device and/or the subscriber) to determine whether the device is registered. In order to determine whether a device is registered, the OME 200 may compare the information received to information stored in the subscriber and device database 250. For example, if the request comprises information identifying the device (e.g., MAC address, IP address, TUNER_ID, or other unique device identifier) the OME 200 will query the database 250 for that device by the identifying information and the query returns a subscriber account record 252 if the device is registered. If the request comprises information identifying the subscriber account, the OME 200 may use this information to determine (based on a query of the subscriber account and associated device records 254) whether content is being requested by a device listed to that subscriber account.
It will also be appreciated that in other embodiments, so-called “off subscriber” devices may be made accessible to the OME. For instance, in one such variant, the subscriber may specify that certain designated devices owned by third parties known to the subscriber can be considered “target” devices for purposes of upgrades and session migration. For example, an MSO subscriber might designate his girlfriend's PC or DSTB (via, e.g., its MAC or IP address) as an approved device for content delivery, since he frequently watches movies or television at her house. The subscriber's friend may or may not also be an MSO subscriber. Where both parties are MSO subscribers, their accounts may be linked so that one or the other (or both) can be designated as available devices from the perspective of the OME. In the case where the friend is not an MSO subscriber, delivery may necessitate carriage of the content “over the top” of another operator's network (e.g., a competing cable or satellite or HFCu service provider), such as via over the Internet, non-competitor controlled link (e.g., WiMAX transport), or via a cooperative arrangement between the network providers. The subscriber would, in one such variant, log into an MSO portal or website via a user login, password, etc. to initiate a “pull” of content from an extant delivery channel/device to the friend's premises device. For example, the login may allow for a network-generated UI (akin to a website page) being generated on the friend's client device, via which the subscriber could select the content for delivery at the friend's device. Login via the Internet (e.g., via a PC) may be used as well.
It is also appreciated that various embodiments of the invention may be configured so as to distinguish specific users versus accounts. For example, a given subscriber account number may be associated with the premises of a family, yet have multiple different users (family members) associated therewith. Hence, the present invention contemplates that: (i) the account or premises may have a profile or preference set associated with it as a whole (e.g., one preference set for all family members, and a listing of all family member devices); (ii) that individual users may have their own preference sets and device listings, which may or may not overlap with other members (e.g., two different family members might list the living room DSTB/DVR as “their” device); and (iii) combinations of (i) and (ii) (e.g., such as where each member has a separate preference set and device list, but there is a default “family” profile). Hence, content may move or be “upgraded” for individual users largely independent of other users within the same subscriber account under one embodiment of the invention (except e.g., where a “collision” or resource contention would occur, such as where two family members are trying to move different content to the same device at the same time). As used herein, the term “user” therefore can refer to one user or multiple aggregated users.
If the requesting device and/or subscriber account identification information does not match an entry in the database, the device has not been registered. A device must be registered before content may be provided thereto. Hence, per step 306, the device is registered by providing information identifying the device and/or subscriber to the OME 200. At step 308, the OME 200 associates the device to a subscriber account. In one embodiment, this occurs by automatically querying the billing systems via the devices MAC address to develop a default profile. In another embodiment, the device may be configured to automatically provide device identification and/or subscriber account information to the BPS 202. The server maintains historical heuristic data which “mines” or determines device content usage patterns in order to determine a more precise custom profile against client future behavior and usage, in one embodiment. Alternatively, a user may enter some or all of the aforementioned information at a user interface (e.g., web portal run by the MSO), such as by entry of a login and password during a registration process to create a default profile. The OME 200 may verify the entered information at the billing system 204. The OME 200 may also request additional information at the billing system 204. For example, if the device only provides device identification information, the OME 200 may query the billing system 204 for the subscriber account to be associated therewith (step 308). Per step 310, the device and associated subscriber account information are reported to and updated in the database 250 records 252, 254.
The OME 200 may also periodically request updates from the billing system 204 or other cognizant entity to update records in the subscriber and device database 250. In this manner, only the most recently updated lists of devices 206 are used for providing delivery platform notifications (as will be discussed below).
If the requesting device identification matches an entry in the database, the device is determined to be registered and, at step 312, the subscriber account and device database 250 is evaluated to determine whether there are additional delivery platforms (e.g., other devices 206 registered to the user's account) available for the provision of the requested content. To this end, the OME 200 may run one or more computer applications for evaluating the available devices 206 listed in the database as being part of the user's account. As will be discussed in greater detail below, the aforementioned computer applications running on the OME 200 may also be utilized to evaluate whether one or more “better” or more appropriate platforms exist, such as by taking into consideration various of the aforementioned configuration factors, available bandwidth, and/or bandwidth requirements for each platform. Alternatively (or in conjunction), the evaluation may be based at least in part on the user (e.g., via user-specified rules or preferences).
The present invention recognizes the fact that “best” or “better” may be highly account or user-specific terms, and predicated on an analysis or preference from the user which at all times may not seem rational. For example, a user may specify a preference to watch a smaller/lower resolution monitor, or PC monitor, versus their best quality platform, simply because they enjoy the location of the smaller/less capable monitor better, have other functions they can be performing while watching programs (e.g., it's in the garage, kitchen, laundry room, out by the pool, etc.). As previously noted, templates or rules can also be applied, such that certain preferences are only in effect in certain scenarios, under certain preconditions, at certain times of day, etc. Hence, user-based preferences or inputs (which may also include passively obtained data, such as history of user usage of certain devices, watching certain modes of delivery (e.g., VOD HD versus SD PPV, etc.) may also be used as a component in the “recommendation engine” of the present invention.
Moreover, QoS-based considerations can be used in the evaluation of delivery modes/platforms according to the present invention. For instance, a given delivery channel such as IP-based MPEG-4 encoded content may be delivered over an in-band or DOCSIS QAM in a cable or satellite network, each of which carries with it inherent QoS and FEC requirements. However, the same content may also be streamed over a non-QoS channel (e.g., via the Internet, which has no such QoS/FEC requirements, thereby potentially impacting user experience). Certain users may be amenable to non-QoS delivery in exchange for example time and/or place utility (e.g., so they can watch it on the platform of their choice when they want to watch it).
Cost is yet another factor that may be considered in evaluation of delivery mode/platform. For example, a user may be amenable to watching a lower-quality free version of a given content element or program versus a high-quality “pay” version. This may also be viewed from the network operator's perspective (e.g., the network operator may always opt to deliver the higher-quality “pay” version so as to increase revenue or profit, or seek to deliver the version or via the mode with the least incremental cost (e.g., that is locally cached, or does not use up bandwidth that could be applied to a higher-revenue use).
It is also noted that in certain embodiments of the invention, available alternative delivery platforms may be specified or selected based on the availability of the requested content in an encoded format that is suitable for the platform. For instance, if the content is only available in MPEG2 format, a prospective alternate client device having only an H.264 decoder would not be a suitable alternative, and hence would be eliminated from consideration (despite the fact that it may satisfy other optimization goals such as providing better user experience, use less bandwidth (H.264 consumes roughly half the bandwidth of MPEG2), etc.
Accordingly, the present invention further contemplates distinguishing “required” factors from “elective” factors. Required factors might for example include suitable codec support, suitable container decoding support (e.g., MP4 container), suitable transport, suitable QoS support (if required), and so forth. Elective factors might include HD or upconversion capability, QoS support (if QoS is not required), HD audio capability, display monitor size/resolution, “surround sound”, recording capability, and so forth. Hence, potential alternative devices can be effectively screened in one embodiment of the invention by first evaluating all of the required factors (for a requested content element and designated delivery mode) against the available devices, and filtering those which do not meet all requirements.
Per step 314, a notification is sent to the user indicating the alternative delivery platforms (e.g., other user devices 206 associated with the user's account), if any, and enabling the user to select individual ones of these platforms for the delivery of the requested content. The user is notified in any number of ways; for example, the notification may be transmitted only to the device 206 on which the user is currently receiving content or has requested content. Alternatively, the notification may be transmitted to all of the client devices 206 associated with the subscriber's account. The notification may intentionally list the recommended devices 206 according to a hierarchy based on the suitability of the device 206 for delivery of the requested content.
The notification in one variant comprises an interactive application which enables the user to select one or more of the given platforms for content delivery. In response to the notification, the user may select to view the content on the requesting client device 206, continue viewing the content on the current client device 206, or the user may select an alternate client device 206 for simultaneous or alternative content provision. In other words, the user may: (i) select to continue or to begin viewing the content on the requesting client device, (ii) may also have the content sent to one or more second client devices, or (iii) or may select to only receive the content on the second client device(s).
In another embodiment, all devices 206 of a given user account are presented as delivery options regardless of their desirability for providing the content. In other words, the user is able to choose, from among all the devices 206 associated with the user account, the devices 206 on which to receive the requested content. These devices can also optionally be ranked; e.g., according to the aforementioned recommendation hierarchy based on the foregoing evaluation, so as to apprise the user of which are the best choices (while also allowing them to see all options). Moreover, those that are incompatible or ineligible for delivery can be so noted (e.g., with an icon, different coloration, etc.).
Once the user's selection(s) are received (step 314), the requested content may be provided to the selected platform(s) at step 316.
The notification may, in another embodiment, be of the type described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/706,620 filed on Feb. 14, 2007, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,944 on Feb. 23, 2016, and entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Content Delivery Notification and Management” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As discussed therein, the notification may offer the user one or more choices, including the choice to either cancel the request or to accept delayed delivery of the requested content on one or more of the available client devices 206. As also discussed therein, if content is requested by the subscriber during a time (or for a time) where the network capacity or bandwidth available for delivery of that content is limited, the notification may alert the subscriber of a potential unavailability of requested content. Similarly, the notification can be made to be dependent on the status of the “target” device(s). For instance, if the user selects a device which is “available” per the billing system, but may not be powered on or connected to the network (and hence not available to receive the data/session associated with the content delivery), then the user of the requesting device will receive notification to this effect, and either allow them to wait or retry after a timeout period, or select another device.
The notification may further provide the subscriber with a projected delivery or availability time for the requested content (either at the requesting client device 206, or at another available device 206). The notification may also allow the subscriber to specify a date and/or time of delivery, such as one convenient to them at any one of the available client devices 206 (e.g., “ten minutes from now”). Still further, the notification may provide the subscriber with a “content/device ready” notification when (i) the content is actually ready for delivery; and/or (ii) the device is ready to accept or display it. The notification may also automatically program or operate the requesting client device 206 or other available client device 206 based on projected or actual delivery information.
Suppose for example, User A registers a PC, a mobile device, a digital set top box (DSTB), and a DVR to the user's account. This information is stored at the database 250, and when User A requests broadcast content on his/her PC (step 302), the OME 200 uses the database 250 to determine that the same content may also be viewed by User A on the other registered devices. The OME 200 evaluates the other features and capabilities of the other registered devices 206 (step 312). Suppose that the evaluation results in the OME 200 determining that the requested broadcast content is better delivered to User A on either his DSTB or recorded on his DVR. Thus, the OME 200 generates and transmits a message to User A informing the user of the “better” delivery options (step 314). User A may then select to receive the content as requested (e.g., at the requesting PC) or may select delivery at one or more of the recommended devices (step 316). For example, User A's selection may result in the requested content being simultaneously or alternatively recorded at User A's registered DVR, and/or may result in a forced “channel” change of User A's registered DSTB (e.g., to a QAM or packet streaming session).
The present invention may be further configured to provide selection of a delivery platform without user intervention (e.g. automatically). For example, the evaluation may give a clearly “best” device 206 for delivery, the delivery may be effected to that device, and the notification merely indicates to the user that the content will be delivered to the “best” device. This can also be subject to user confirmation (e.g., “OK to switch?”), and/or user-based preferences or rules sets (e.g., “never switch from 1080p plasma display to PC”).
In another example, a master scheduler may be used. The master scheduler may enable the user to select one or more of the CPE 106 associated with the user's subscriber account for delivery of the requested content. The master scheduler, in one instance, may deny programming to client based on profiles, during certain periods, based on the programming content itself, etc. For example, adult programming may be denied when it is known that the client device is associated to a minor and/or during certain periods. In another instance, the master scheduler can initiate a push of content to certain devices that have storage capabilities. The content push may be based on the content itself, the time of viewing, etc. In another instance, the master schedule is configured to move content from devices around the networks based on specific criteria, local storage maximization, device usage, and/or period usage. For example, the master schedule may assist a user in moving requested content to their vacation home during a vacation, or routing phone calls.
It will also be appreciated that the logic of the method of
Alternatively, a complete evaluation (such as that described in
Referring now to
As shown in
To this end, a distributed application (DA) with a “server” portion and “client” portion can be utilized. For example, the client portion may be disposed on a network gateway or CPD at the premises, and run so as to periodically poll or determine status of the various registered devices on the premises network. This information is used by the client portion to either (i) generate notifications or recommendations locally at the premises; or (ii) generate a message or signaling upstream to the OME server portion, so that the latter can generate notifications or recommendations.
At step 332 of the method 330, the OME (or its proxy) selects a first device (“n”) from a listing of available devices for that premises. This listing may be obtained locally (e.g., at the premises itself, such as one stored on a gateway, CPD, PC, or other device), or via the aforementioned subscriber database.
At step 334, the status of the selected device as a current delivery platform is determined. For instance, in one variant, the OME 200 determines whether content is actively being delivered to that device from the network (e.g., via in-band QAM, IP session, WiMAX transport, etc.). The control and protocol translation server may, in one embodiment be configured to store information relating to what the content currently being sent to any subscriber premises and/or devices associated therewith. The server generates this information based on its role in receiving all of the content request messaging, whether on or off the network, as programmed in the client device or software. The server may then use this information to manage the device states.
In another variant, each of the user's devices can be equipped with a client portion or application which allows the user to “pull” content delivery to that platform.
As previously noted, devices outside the user's premises may also be included within a device listing associated with a given account. For example if User A frequently visits their neighbors down the street (who are not MSO subscribers) and watches movies there, such as every Saturday night, they could add the MAC address or other identifying data associated with their neighbor's CPE (e.g., DSTB) to their account profile. When they arrive at their neighbor's house, the subscriber could log in (i.e., user-based login/password/security challenge, etc.) via their neighbor's IP-enabled CPE, and then request content from that CPE (e.g., via an IP-based delivery transport such as the Internet, which may even include for example a DOCSIS delivery over another MSO's network).
If the neighbors are also MSO subscribers, but perhaps may not have the same privileges or features (e.g., HBO subscription) at their house, the same logic may be applied, yet delivery of the HBO content may occur, yet via in-band QAM, WiMAX transport, or other MSO-operated delivery infrastructure.
These delivery use cases illustrate the “TV anywhere” concept afforded to MSO subscribers under one embodiment of the present invention.
If the selected device is currently being used to receive content from the network (step 336), this device is marked as “current”, and the next device in the listing selected per step 338. If not, then the selected device is evaluated by the OME to determine its capabilities per step 340. The evaluation may be as simple as determining whether the selected device is capable of receiving the requested content (e.g., it may be rendered at a resolution incompatible with the selected device, may be encoded using an incompatible codec or container format, may require more delivery bandwidth than the transport can sustain, may not meet QoS requirements, etc.). However, more sophisticated evaluations may also be conducted (e.g., to characterize the device in various different aspects).
At step 342, it is determined whether the selected device that was evaluated at step 340 was the last device on the listing (i.e., whether all devices associated with the premises or account have been evaluated). If so, then the results of the evaluations, and any templates or user-specified rules sets, are processed by the OME 200) to determine recommendation/hierarchy per step 344. If not, the additional remaining devices in the listing are processed as above.
In another embodiment of the invention, a user-assigned heuristic regarding the desirability of each device in their listing can be used as the basis of ranking or selection. For instance, a user is on one variant presented with a GUI listing the several devices available at the premises (e.g., HDTV monitor (54 inch), HDTV monitor (32 inch), PC, laptop, and smartphone). The user may specify that it is always most desirable to prioritize the 32-inch monitor, since that is where the user watches most of his/her programs (even though the 54-inch may give a better “user experience” in terms of video and audio quality). However, when the user is not at their premises, the primary desired mode of delivery might be listed as the laptop computer (followed by the smartphone).
Audio aspects can also be considered as part of the evaluation/ranking. For instance, in the context of the foregoing example, one of the HDTV monitors may also include “surround sound” or similar, which greatly enhances the audio aspects of the content presentation. These may be combined with (e.g., according to a weighting function) video aspects of “user experience” as part of the evaluation process.
Session Transfer—
Referring now to
Accordingly, the improved methods and apparatus of the present invention seek to provide a substantially seamless mechanism for such transfers. In one embodiment, an extant session (e.g., SIP session between a content delivery server and the first client device (transferor)) is maintained and modified to add the transferee device, with subsequent removal of the transferor device from the session. As described elsewhere herein, “state” information may optionally be utilized consistent with this approach in order to allow for transfer without significant discontinuity, even where the transferee device is not yet powered up or available.
As shown in
Delivery of content to the first device may then be ceased as desired (step 410).
It is noted that in step 406, the session established between the content source and the second recipient device may be the same or a different session than that established in step 402 with the first device; e.g., a SIP session can advantageously have multiple participants within the same “session” (e.g., via conferencing), and hence deliver a given content stream to multiple endpoints, although such use of a unified session is by no means a requirement of the invention.
For instance, in one implementation of the method 400, the content source comprises an IP TV (Internet Protocol television) server disposed within a content delivery network (e.g., a satellite or Hybrid Fiber coaxial (HFC) cable television network, and the packetized content is delivered according to a unicast session via one or more DOCSIS or other QAM channels). In one embodiment, live content is also delivered via a multicast delivery system. If the consuming device capabilities do not align, more than one multicast may be initiated. In some instances, this has the desired effect of improving the efficiency of the delivery mechanism when more than one customer requests a stream in the same service group, and entails little penalty in terms of bandwidth even when only one device is consuming the stream.
The aforementioned method may also be performed automatically (i.e., without substantial user intervention) if desired. For instance, once a notification of a prospective “upgrade” is sent to the user, if the user opts to accept the upgrade, the foregoing transfer can be automatically invoked without further user action.
Moreover, various techniques can be invoked and used within the foregoing methods so as to avoid loss of “state” of the delivered content. For example, where the content delivery mechanism within the first session is non-linear (e.g., VOD, nPVR, or similar), a simple command or signal to the content delivery server to pause the stream can be used, thereby preventing any loss of content from the user's perspective. In cases of linear content delivery (e.g., live broadcast), a network- or premises-based recording function can be invoked, such as where a network DVR or premises DVR function is messaged to start recording the stream from a prescribed timing coordinate, packet ID, or cue until the second session is established or the user affirmatively allows content delivery via the second session (e.g., selects an “OK” function on the second device, thereby allowing for continued content delivery).
In yet another implementation, the linear packet stream can simply be buffered (e.g., at the server, such as in a FIFO buffer sized appropriately for a suitable transition time), and the buffer contents read out when the second session has been established and the user has OK′d further delivery.
It is appreciated that the foregoing functionality may be implemented according to any number of different network architectures. For example the well known IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) associated with 3GPP and other relevant standards can be used as a basis for the foregoing SIP sessions and functions. IMS is particularly designed with a common control plane architecture which advantageously facilitates “blending” of control functions of services and applications, such as is described in U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/256,903 entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PACKETIZED CONTENT DELIVERY OVER A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK, previously incorporated herein. This technology is particularly useful in cross-network (e.g., off-net to on-net, and vice versa) transfers of sessions such as those contemplated by the present invention, since the common control plane architecture allows for handover of the session across network boundaries. For example, in one such scenario, a user may wish to transfer an extant “broadcast” session delivered over say a cable or satellite or HFCu network to a cellular, WiMAX, or FLO (Forward Link Only)-enabled handset or mobile device, such as when the user is leaving their premises but wishes to keep watching a given program. By instantiating delivery of the broadcast/linear over say a SIP session to the premises device, and then transferring the session to the handset (and hence delivering the packetized media stream over the IMS infrastructure off-net), the user can experience a seamless handoff to the handset, which will then receive the packet stream via the designated wireless infrastructure (e.g., UMTS/3G, WiMAX, FLO, etc.), yet which is still originated from the MSO network sources. In this fashion, MSO-derived content (which may come from off-net sources itself, such as the Internet) can be delivered to MSO subscribers both on-net and off-net, and switching back and forth is easily accomplished.
Optimization and Monitoring Entity—
Referring to
The network interface 504 enables direct or indirect communication between the OME 200 and various entities of the network 101, such as e.g., the client devices 206. It is noted that the network interface 504 may comprise a plurality of interfaces for use with other network apparatus such as RF combiners, IP routers and other packet network devices, network management and provisioning systems, local PCs, etc. The interface 504 may be e.g., an IEEE-1394 interface, a USB interface, a LAN interface, an ASI/GBE interface, wireless (e.g., WiMAX) etc.
The back end interfaces 508 comprise a plurality of interfaces (e.g., IEEE-1394, USB, LAN/WAN, Wireless, etc.) which facilitate communication between the OME 200 and other network devices, such as those in the BPS 202 (e.g., the server 201 and database 205). The back end interfaces 508 may also facilitate communication with other devices (not shown) in the BPS 202 or elsewhere in the network 101 as needed, such as other management processes.
The processor 506 is configured to run a monitoring application 510, an evaluation application 512 and a notification application 514 thereon. In the illustrated embodiment, each of these applications 510, 512, 514 work in conjunction with one another and with the BPS 202 entities to determine, evaluate, and provide notification of one or more alternative content delivery platforms, each of the applications 510, 512, 514 will be described in turn herein below.
The monitoring application 510 running on the OME 200 monitors the devices 206 receiving content by communicating with the server 201 to receive copies of content requests which were sent to the server 201 from the client devices 206. In other words, as a client device 206 requests content from the server 201, the request is copied and forwarded to the OME 200. Other schemes may be used as well, however, such as where the content requests are routed through the OME first and forwarded to the server, delivered in parallel, or one entity signals the other without copying or forwarding the request (which may include extraction of relevant information, and creation of a separate message in the appropriate format for inter-process communication between the entities).
The monitoring application 510 uses information in the content requests to identify the client device 206 requesting content and to identify the subscriber account associated with the client device 206. For example, the content requests may contain a unique device identifier (such as e.g., IP address, MAC address, digital signature (e.g., hash or residue, etc.); the content requests may further contain information identifying a subscriber account (such as e.g., subscriber account number, subscriber address, login and password combination, secret image or challenge question information, etc.).
In the event that only the device 206 identification is provided in the content request, the monitoring application 510 will determine the subscriber account with which the device 206 is associated (if any). In one embodiment, the monitoring application 510 will do so by querying the device description records 254 stored at the database 250 to find a subscriber account association (e.g., to find the subscriber account record 252 linked thereto). In another embodiment, the monitoring application 510 may query the billing system 204 to find an association of the given device 206 to a particular subscriber account.
Once the monitoring application 510 identifies the device 206 and its associated subscriber account, the application passes this information to either the notification application 514, or the evaluation application 512, or both. If the information is passed directly to the notification application 514, the application 514 simply generates notices to the subscriber indicating all of the devices 206 which are available. If the information is passed to the evaluation application 512, the application 512 determines whether any of the available devices 206 is a “better” or more appropriate platform for the delivery of the requested content, and makes a recommendation. The recommendation is then forwarded to the notification application 514 so that a notice may be sent to the user reflecting the information generated by the evaluation application 512 (e.g., a hierarchical ranking of options, deletion of those not meeting a specified criterion or level of service “quality”, etc.).
The evaluation application 512 running on the processor 506 of the OME 200 comprises one or more computer programs adapted to evaluate content delivery modes/platforms, once it is determined one or more client devices 206 are available for delivery of the requested content (e.g., are registered to the same account as the requesting device 206) As previously discussed, the application 512 may also include a “recommendation engine” which recommends one or more for alternative and/or additional delivery of the requested content. In other words, in the exemplary embodiment, the monitoring application 510 determines all of the devices 206 in the subscriber's account, and forwards this information to the evaluation application 512. The evaluation application 512 evaluates each of the available devices based on one or more criteria, and provides a list or other means of indicating one or more delivery platforms which are deemed to be appropriate for the delivery of the requested content (or more appropriate than the requesting device 206). It is noted, however, that in alternate embodiments, the monitoring application 510 may pre-process or filter the list of “available” devices before sending this information to the evaluation application, such as where the monitoring application determines the state of each device associated with a user (or account), and filters them based on lack of accessibility. Devices may also be arranged by the monitoring application by tier or classification; e.g., currently powered-on versus powered-down devices, HD-capable versus non-HD capable devices, fixed versus mobile devices, etc. This may be accomplished based on configuration information contained within the subscriber/device database, via a query to each device (or monitoring some aspect of device operation, such as a periodic heartbeat), query to the user for device status, or any combination of the foregoing, as described in greater detail subsequently herein.
As noted above, the appropriateness of a content delivery device 206 may be determined based on one or more of a variety of criteria, including without limitation: (i) device availability/current status; (ii) capabilities (e.g., hardware/software configuration); (iii) cost implications to the user; (iv) cost/revenue implications to the network operator; (iv) picture/audio quality and “user experience”; (v) network parameters/limitations (e.g., bandwidth, need to instantiate a new session or QAM for delivery, etc.); and/or (vi) user preferences and/or “templates” provided by the user. For example, the evaluation application 512 may be configured to evaluate each of the devices based on bandwidth requirements/availability. In one embodiment, the apparatus and methods disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/243,720 filed on Oct. 4, 2005, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,582,584 on Nov. 12, 2013, and entitled “Self-Monitoring and Optimizing Network Apparatus and Methods”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be used by the evaluation application 512 to recommend devices 206 for optimized content delivery. As discussed therein, the evaluation application 512 may employ a substantially automated and anticipatory mechanism whereby a content delivery network, such as a broadcast switched architecture (BSA) network, can effectively “self-monitor” and optimize its bandwidth allocation based on, inter alia, data received from the receivers (e.g., DSTBs) within its service area, or from the network as a whole. The evaluation application 512 analyzes information gathered from the devices 206 (as well as optionally other information relating to, e.g., the network itself or other historical periods) to determine the expected statistical variations of the system as a function of time and various events (e.g., holidays), and the expected statistical viewing behavior of known future details of the offered content, in effect allowing it to predict subscriber behavior and make adjustments to the operational parameters of the network based on these predictions.
As another example, the methods and apparatus of co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/881,034 filed on Jul. 24, 2007, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,770,200 on Aug. 3, 2010, and entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Format Selection for Network Optimization”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be utilized to determine which devices of a subscriber's available devices would be best suited for providing optimized content delivery. Accordingly, the evaluation application 512 may be configured to evaluate and recommend devices 206 for content delivery which minimize bandwidth consumption while also maximizing subscriber satisfaction and service level (e.g., video and/or audio quality).
The evaluation application 512 may also take into account what is known about the devices 206 (e.g., HD capabilities, MPEG2 or MPEG4 decoding capabilities, etc.) to determine which devices should be recommended (or how the multiple devices should be ranked). For example, if it is known that a group of user devices 206 in a service area are HD-capable, then the evaluation application 512 may recommend a user utilize the ones of the user's devices 206 which are HD capable, thus enabling these devices 206 to tune to any available HD versions of programs to reduce the instances of duplicate programming, and to satisfy SD programming requests using HD programming. Conversely, in times of constrained bandwidth, the evaluation application 512 may recommend only SD capable devices (and/or not recommend HD devices) 206 so that an SD version of a program (or a lower bitrate stream of the HD program) may be delivered, including during instances where an HD program is requested. The evaluation application 512 may further take into account whether particular ones of the user's available devices 206 have up-conversion capability, in which the user may still advantageously experience substantially “HD-quality” video, even though the device 206 input has been switched to SD, and may recommend these devices in instances of constrained bandwidth.
The evaluation application 512 may also evaluate the devices 206 identified by the monitoring application 510 as being within the subscriber's account, and make recommendations based at least in part on what is known about the user. For example, the evaluation application 512 may be configured to record information regarding the viewing habits of the subscriber with respect to the one or more devices 206 held within the subscriber's account, and utilize this information to recommend (based on the type of content requested and/or the requesting device 206), other platforms for delivery of the content, and/or other content for delivery on the requesting device 206.
Suppose for example, that previous (historical) viewing patterns for User A indicate that User A enjoys viewing broadcast or “linear” content the vast majority of the time on his in-home DSTB. Accordingly, when a request is received from User A from a mobile device for broadcast content, the evaluation application 512 may utilize the historical information to determine that it is possible that User A would prefer to view the content on his DSTB (or record the content on his premises DVR for later viewing), and may therefore recommend this device to User A. In addition, the evaluation application 512 may, based on the aforementioned viewing patterns, recommend content similar to the content being requested (and which is in a compatible format) for viewing by User A on the mobile device.
The aforementioned historical data collection and storage may be provided using e.g., the methods and apparatus disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/243,720 filed on Oct. 4, 2005 and entitled “Self-Monitoring and Optimizing Network Apparatus and Methods”, previously incorporated herein.
The aforementioned embodiment of the evaluation application 512, wherein it recommends alternative delivery platforms (e.g., alternate devices 206 associated with the user's account) based at least in part on the capabilities of the various devices 206 available to the user, may be configured to obtain the device capabilities via a variety of mechanisms. For instance, a device profile defining the various features and capabilities (including content decoding capabilities, security features, etc.) of the devices 206 may be transmitted to the network (e.g., the billing system 204, the OME 200, or a storage entity in communication with either located at the BPS 202 or elsewhere at the headend 150) from each client device 206. These device profiles may be part of a content request (e.g. as part of a message payload, metadata, etc.), or sent as a separate communication, and may be of a standardized format as well, thereby facilitating ingestion into the network. These profiles may be periodically or anecdotally updated as well, such as via a “push” from the CPE to the network (e.g., upon startup), or a “pull” from the network (e.g., a request sent from the OME or other network entity to the CPE when an update is required). In one embodiment, the methods and apparatus disclosed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/904,408 filed on Sep. 26, 2007, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,458,753 on Jun. 4, 2013, and entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Device Capabilities Discovery and Utilization Within a Content-based Network”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, are used. This disclosure describes inter alia apparatus and methods for determining and selecting digital coding and/or decoding technology, delivery bitrates, and resolution parameters for programming and data delivery over, e.g., a content delivery network. Hardware and software functions/modules of the different devices 206 on the network contain various capabilities and options, including conditional access capabilities, video coding or compression capabilities, encryption schema, and network interfaces. These are transmitted to a headend entity (e.g., the OME 200) in the form of a capabilities profile for analysis. The headend entity determines the one or more capabilities possessed by client devices 206, and evaluates one or more program or content choices for possible delivery to each of the devices 206 based on its profile. In the context of the present invention, the evaluation application 512 may evaluate the device capabilities discussed above when making device rankings or recommendations. The evaluation application 512 may further take into consideration network and/or device operational considerations, such as conservation of downstream bandwidth, device uprating capability, client device power consumption, and the like according to this embodiment, as discussed elsewhere herein.
In another embodiment, the client device 206 capabilities may be derived exclusively from the OME 200, billing system 204, or other headend entity. For example, when a user registers a device 206 to the billing system 204 (and information regarding the device 206 is stored at the subscriber device database 250), the billing system 204 and/or OME 200 may utilize information identifying the device (such as the IP address, MAC address, etc.) to generate a device description record 256 (as shown in
The evaluation application 512, in another embodiment, may utilize the MAC address associated with the requesting devices 206 and received by the OME 200 as a part of a content request to determine recommendations. The OME 200, upon receiving the MAC address, may identify a portion of the address (such as e.g., the organizationally unique identifier or OUI) as indicative of the type of device requesting access to content. The OME 200 may utilize this information to determine the precise one of a subscriber's devices which is requesting content, and recommend an alternative delivery platform based thereon (e.g., based on another device with similar capabilities/configuration profile). For example, suppose the OUI of the MAC address of the requesting device indicates that the device is manufactured by Scientific Atlanta, and also that a subscriber has registered a Dell PC, a Motorola MR-DVR, an Apple laptop computer, and a Scientific Atlanta STB within their MSO account. The OME 200 is configured to deduce that the requesting device is the STB based on the MAC address OUI (indicating Scientific Atlanta). The evaluation application 512 may then determine whether to recommend either of the other devices in the subscriber's accounts as indicated above, such as based on comparable capabilities (e.g., the Motorola MR-DVR may be comparable in capabilities or configuration as far as content delivery is concerned, and hence may be a viable candidate). In this regard, the MAC address may also feasibly be used to determine device configuration. For example, part of the MAC address or range of values may correspond to a known device type or family from the manufacturer associated with the OUI (i.e., the OUI indicates a Scientific Atlanta STB, and a second portion of the MAC indicates a 3250-family device). The evaluation application 512 can then pull a pre-stored template (or obtain one from a third party, such as Scientific Atlanta) indicating generally the capabilities of the requesting device. The evaluation application 512 can then determine if any of the other devices in the subscriber's account have similar or sufficient capabilities with respect to one or more predetermined attributes.
The recommendations made by the evaluation application 512 are in one embodiment provided to users via notices generated by the notification application 514.
The notification application 514 running on the OME 200 generates and provides notifications to the client devices 206 indicating which, if any, of the user's other devices 206 may receive the content alternatively (or in addition) to the content being received at the requesting device 206. The notification application 514 receives information from the monitor application 510 and/or the evaluation application 512 indicating one or more devices in a subscriber's network which are capable of displaying the requested content (or which represent an improvement or “upgrade”). The notification application 514 compiles this information into one or more notices. The notices may be delivered only to the requesting device 206, to only active or communicate devices within the user's account, or all of the devices 206 which are identified as being a member of the requesting user's account (whether currently active or not).
The notifications generated by the notification application 514 are, in one embodiment, interactive in nature. For example, the notifications may be adapted to enable the user to select one or more of the presented content delivery platforms. Suppose for example, that the notification application 514 generates a notification listing the user's requesting device 206, as well as a DVR 226 and STB 222 as other devices in the user's network. The user may then select to continue (or begin) viewing the requested content on the requesting device 206, as well as optionally select to have the content delivered to either or both the DVR 226 and STB 222 (or one of those devices, and not the requesting device 206).
As indicated above, the notification may, in one embodiment, be of the type described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/706,620 entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Content Delivery Notification and Management” previously incorporated herein. As discussed therein, the notification application 514 may generate notifications which enable users one or more choices, such as, choosing the delivery platform, scheduling delayed delivery, canceling a request, etc. Further, the notification application 514 may work in conjunction with the monitoring application 510 to determine whether the network has capacity or bandwidth available to service the request at each of the user's devices, and may generate notifications which alert the subscriber of a potential unavailability of requested content on various ones of these devices 206.
The notifications generated by the notification application 514 may further provide a projected delivery or availability time for the requested content (either at the requesting client device 206, or at another available device).
It is further appreciated that a master scheduler application (not shown) may also be run on the processor 506 of the OME 200. The master scheduler application enables the user to select one or more of the CPE 106 associated with the user's subscriber account for delivery of the requested content, and schedule delivery of content thereto (as discussed above). In one embodiment, the master scheduler functionality is included within the aforementioned notification application 514, which is configured to receive and process delivery scheduling commands or input, thereby enabling a user to enter a specific date and/or time for delivery of content for individual ones of the available client devices 206. For example, the user may be able to specify delivery of certain content to their DSTB/HDTV in the living room from 8:00 pm to 11:00 μm, and then at their second receiver/smaller monitor in the bedroom from 11:00 pm through 8:00 am. As described elsewhere herein, an extant content delivery session may also be moved seamlessly between the two environments, such as by e.g., adding the second device to an existing IP unicast or multicast, and then removing the first device at the prescribed time (e.g., via SIP multi-party “conferencing” or similar protocols).
State Information—
In one embodiment, a network entity (e.g., a REST search/recommendation entity such as that described in U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/256,903 entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PACKETIZED CONTENT DELIVERY OVER A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK, previously incorporated herein) may be utilized to provide state transfer capabilities between devices. As used herein, the term “state” refers without limitation to the status, temporal, or other context associated with one or more content elements. For example, the aforementioned exemplary REST search/recommendation entity enables a user to “book mark” content at a first device, and have the content moved to a different place in the premises and/or a different device. In other words, the state of the content at the first device is identified and transferred (as metadata) along with the content, to a second device. The second device may then begin playback of the content according to the state identified in the metadata. Other states may be transferred as well including e.g., a pause, StartOver, etc. function. The state transfer capabilities may be automatic (such as upon teardown) and/or subject to user request. The above-disclosed state transfer capabilities may be affected via a uniform user interface (present on each of the devices) and enable content state transfer across multiple, different platforms.
In one embodiment, the general state transfer concepts are of the type discussed in co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,486,869 issued Feb. 3, 2009 and entitled “System And Method For Controlling A Digital Video Recorder On A Cable Network”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As discussed therein, signaling associated with the answering or initiation of a digital telephone call by a digital telephone subscriber is used to issue commands to a digital video recorder (DVR). For example, a signal is generated by a first device at a first event (such as e.g., a signal is generated when a telephone is enters an “off-hook” state), the signal is sent to a second device indicating the event (such as e.g., a DVR). In response to receiving the signal, the second device takes some action with respect to content (e.g., pausing or initiating a recording of the content at the DVR). A second signal received from the first device may, in one embodiment, be generated on the happening of a second event, transferred to the second device and cause a second response at the second device. The aforementioned state messages may be sent over an out-of-band channel/path between the devices.
In another embodiment, the aforementioned state transfer capabilities may be utilized to provide state transfer operations between legacy devices and IP capable devices by e.g., utilizing a VOD mechanism to move a state message there between. Various other approaches may be used as well consistent with the present information.
Client Device Implementations—
Referring now to
The illustrated client device 206 can assume literally any discrete form factor, including those adapted for desktop, floor-standing, or wall-mounted use, or alternatively may be integrated in whole or part (e.g., on a common functional basis) with other devices if desired.
It will also be recognized that the device configuration shown is essentially for illustrative purposes, and various other configurations of the client devices 206 are consistent with other embodiments of the invention. For example, the device 206 in
The network interface 602 of the illustrated client device 206 receives content and/or data from the content distribution network (e.g., HFC, HFCu, satellite, etc. network 101). In one embodiment, the network interface 602 may comprise a traditional video RF front end (e.g., tuner) adapted to receive video signals over, e.g., one or more QAMs. For example, the RF front end may comprise one or more tuners, a demodulator, decryption module, and demultiplexer of the type well known in the art, although other configurations may be used. A wideband tuner arrangement such as that described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/013,671 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Wideband Distribution of Content” filed on Dec. 15, 2004, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,723,267 on Aug. 1, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may also be utilized, such as where the content associated with one or more program streams is distributed across two or more QAMs. The network interface 602 may, alternatively comprise any number of a mechanisms for the receipt of content and/or data.
Additionally, the network interface 602 modulates, encrypts/multiplexes as required, and transmits digital information for receipt by upstream entities such as the CMTS or a network server. Programming data may also be stored on the device storage unit 606 (discussed below) for later distribution by way of the video interface, or using a Wi-Fi interface, Ethernet interface, FireWire (IEEE Std 1394), USB/USB2, or any number of other such options.
The network interface 602 may further comprise a cable modem (CM) of the type known in the art. In this fashion, and content or data normally streamed over the CM can be received and distributed by the client device 206, such as for example packetized video (e.g., IPTV) or broadband Internet data.
Programming and other types of data including pictures, video, music or MP3 files, software applications, metadata files, etc. may also be received by way of the various digital interfaces in the client device 206. These data may be stored locally (e.g., in the storage unit 606) or even on a device or network agent in communication with the client device 606, for later use by a user as is discussed in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/378,129 filed on Mar. 16, 2006 and entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CENTRALIZED CONTENT AND DATA DELIVERY”, previously incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As discussed therein, a user may receive a video, JPEG, etc. MP3 file, from a friend's smartphone or PMD, which can then be “pushed” to a corresponding interface on the client device 206, wherein the data is stored on the mass storage device 606. Similarly, video data from a connected DVD player/burner might be streamed from the player to the device 206 for storage thereon (or distribution via yet another interface, such as via the Ethernet interface to another client device 206).
The mass storage device 606 of the illustrated embodiment comprises a Serial-ATA (SATA) or Ultra-ATA (also known as Ultra-DMA, or ATA-4/5/6/7) hard disk drive for the operating system and content storage of at least 300 GB, although higher capacities and even RAID arrays may be used for this purpose.
A registration application 610 (located in the storage unit 606 or program memory) is run on the processor 604 of the client device 206. The registration application 610 is utilized by the client device 206 to provide information regarding the device and the subscriber to the OME 200 and/or billing system 204. In one embodiment, the device 206 identifier (e.g., MAC address) is manually entered by a technician or other MSO personnel. For example, the user may, via telephone, email, text message, etc. give an operator a MAC address to be added to his/her account. Alternatively, a technician may connect the device 206 to the user's premises and facilitate its addition to the user's account (e.g., via a service call) using the registration application 610. In another embodiment, when a user plugs a client device 206 into an existing home or premises network, a series of communications automatically occur between the added device 206 and one or more headend 150 entities (such as the OME 200 and/or billing system 204) resulting in the registration of the device 206 to the user's account without requiring a substantial user, operator and/or technician action or intervention.
The client device 206 is further configured to run a client application 612 thereon (which may be integrated with the aforementioned registration application, or other applications of the CPE if desired). The client application 612 enables the device 206 to receive and display notifications from the notification application 514, and also enables the user of the device to interact with the notifications. The client application 612 may be further configured to analyze the client device 206 capabilities, and report these to the OME 200 for storage in the database 250 as device description records 256, as described elsewhere herein.
In another implementation (not shown), content and/or data may be distributed to the client devices 206 via Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) transport; see IEEE Std. 802.16e-2005 entitled “IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks—Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile—Broadband Wireless Access Systems Amendment 2: Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. For example, multiple WiMAX base stations may be established by the MSO or other content provider. One or more of the WiMAX stations transmit programming or other content and/or data to the client devices 206 (which may include simultaneously, so as to ensure a robust signal is received and to potentially support any QoS requirements). In one embodiment, a client device 206 may transmit registration information out-of-band data via WiMAX transport. In this fashion, the WiMAX transport acts as a wireless data “pipe” in parallel to the normal DOCSIS or in-band RF channels (e.g., QAMs) transmitted over the cable or satellite distribution network.
In the context of the present invention for example, the client device 206 might transmit content requests via the cable network to the server 201 (which are subsequently passed to the OME 200), yet receive requested content (at the requesting device and/or at a second device) via the WIMAX broadband interface. Alternatively, the WiMAX interface could be used to transmit the requests to the server 201 (via a WiMAX interface associated with the latter), with delivery of the requested content being via in-band or DOCSIS RF QAMs. The aforementioned WiMAX interface may also be utilized by the client device 206 and/or the OME 200 and billing system 204 during the registration process. Various other permutations of the foregoing will be recognized by those of ordinary skill given the present disclosure.
User Interface—
In another aspect of the invention, a substantially centralized user interface and control device is disclosed which permits the transfer or migration of content delivery sessions (e.g., SIP-based IPTV sessions or the like) between two or more devices. In one implementation, the user's premises gateway or DSTB and associated display device, or PC, is used as the host (control) device for the user interface, the latter which shows the various premises and “off-net” devices associated with the user/subscriber account, and their interconnectivity (i.e., which devices are currently in communication with others via wired or wireless interfaces, etc.).
For example, “on-net” devices might include the user's premises gateway or CPD, DSTB, DVR, WiMAX-enabled receiver, HDTV, etc., while “off net” devices might include the user's Wi-Fi-enabled laptop or smartphone, cellular smartphone (which may be the same device as the former), PMD, etc. As used herein, the terms “on-net” and “off-net” are used merely to highlight the difference between services or delivery modes provided by the MSO and those provided by an outside or third-party operator (e.g., cellular service provider or wireless service provider), although these terms are by no means determinative, and in fact devices can switch hosting (e.g., go from on-net to off-net, and vice versa), or be multi-functioned. For example, a WiMAX-enabled portable receiver may be serviced by the MSO infrastructure for delivery of MSO content as described elsewhere herein, or be serviced by a separate wireless service provider not associated with the MSO, or both.
In one variant, the control device includes a GUI functionality (e.g., a multi-touch-screen GUI, drag-and-drop, speech recognition application, or other interface/input device) allows the user to rapidly designate particular devices for establishment of a session/delivery of content, and/or transfer existing communication sessions between capable devices (such as may be determined by the OME recommendation engine). Remote control devices associated with extant devices such as DVRs, DSTBs, etc. can for example be modified to include the foregoing UI/GUI functionality, or a separate dedicated device provided.
In another variant, a separate centrally located “always on” device with touch screen functionality is provided, so that the user can see the status and connectivity of all devices, and control the transfer of content delivery sessions via the device. For example, the UI shows all devices in premises, and touch screen and “drag and drop” functionality allows the user to select an icon associated with a given device with an active content delivery (e.g., SIP) session, and literally drag their finger to the icon of a second (and/or third) device desired to receive the content. This drag and drop function will then be treated as the user “OK” to transfer the session automatically as described elsewhere herein (which may also include “state” preservation functions if desired).
In another embodiment, a substantially network-based user interface is employed; see e.g., the exemplary implementation described in co-owned U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/256,903 filed on Oct. 30, 2009, previously incorporated herein. In this embodiment, a network entity (e.g., server) is used to manage and update UI's generated on the client devices within the network, including generation of graphics, listings, etc. illustrating different device delivery options as described elsewhere herein. For instance, in one scenario, the user requests delivery of a particular content element via their IP-enabled DSTB and associated monitor. The resulting evaluation of associated user/premises devices produces a recommendation or listing of other devices, which are then displayed on the UI (e.g., in a graphical format, table, etc.), akin to adding another “service”.
In yet another embodiment, a speech recognition and command interface of the type well known in the digital signal processing arts is used in conjunction with the aforementioned client device to move sessions from one device to another. This embodiment operates substantially similar to those previously described (e.g., remote control, display, or touch-screen controlled), yet using predetermined commands to effect session transfer. For example, plain language commands such as “Move Transformers to Bedroom” or the like may be employed via the speech interface. In one variant, the speech recognition system can be trained by the user as to particular commands, which may be location- or device-based (e.g., “Move Living Room to Bedroom” or “Move DSTBI to PC”), or alternatively may be context or content based (“Move [content identifier] to [location] or [device]”), and so forth. The content identifiers selected by the user may in another variant be sent up to the OME or other entity within the network for future access or use; i.e. to allow for encoding of the metadata associated with a particular user session “on the fly” so that the voice command interface will be operative and recognize that particular user's commands. For instance, one user might call the movie “Transformers” by that name, whereas another use might say “movie on HBO” or “movie about transforming robots”, and hence prior knowledge by the network of a given user's commands enables the encoding specific to that user. Metadata encoded with content may also or alternatively include several keywords (e.g., “transformer”, “robot”, “Megan Fox”, “HBO”, etc.), which may be used by a search function or engine disposed on the client device (or the network entity) to identify the relevant content element. Other commands may also be programmed in; e.g., “Move Transformers to Bedroom in Five Minutes and Shut Down DSTB”, or the like.
Voice commands may also be user-specific, such that only a particular user's voice is operative to command session transfer (e.g., via biometrics).
In another variant, speech or another user attribute can be used to determine user presence/movement within a premises. This information can be fed into the client-side application (or even transmitted to the OME) so as to allow for command-prompted or even automatic session transfer within the premises. For example, in one scenario, the user merely says “I am here” when they desire to transfer the session to their new location. The speech recognition engine/command interface receives this input and determines where “here” is (e.g., bedroom, by virtue of the location of the microphone or other device receiving the voice signal), and transfers the session.
Alternatively, a sensor (such as Passive IR or the like, which may even be associated with another host system such as a premises security system) can be used to transfer, initiate, or terminate sessions or other device functions (e.g., power up/down, tuning, etc.). Hence, when a user walks from the living room to the bedroom, the client application and/or OME can receive information regarding the user's location, and move (or replicate) the session automatically. Of course, this type of approach is best suited for a situation where relatively infrequent movement occurs by very few or one individual (e.g., an older person who lives alone and does not move room-to-room very often), although it is not so limited to such applications.
Business Models and “Rules” Engine—
In another aspect of the invention, one or more computer programs running on the processor 406 of the OME 200 (or other entity such as e.g., server 201, BSA hub entity, client device 206, etc.) includes a so-called “rules” engine. This engine comprises, in an exemplary embodiment, one or more software routines adapted to control the operation of the client devices 206 (and optionally supporting network infrastructure) in order to achieve one or more goals relating to operations or business (e.g., profit). Included within these areas are network optimization and reliability goals, increased maintenance intervals, increased subscriber or user satisfaction, increased subscription base, higher revenue or profit (e.g., from increased advertising revenues), more subscriber “views” of given content, higher data download speed, increased bandwidth and responsiveness to changing demands for bandwidth, reduction of undue QAM replication, and so forth.
These rules engine may comprise a separate entity or process, and may also be fully integrated within other processing entities (such as the aforementioned OME), and controlled via e.g., a GUI displayed on a device connected to the relevant device or server. In effect, the rules engine comprises a supervisory entity which monitors and selectively controls the operation of the clients 206 at a higher level, so as to implement desired operational or business rules. The rules engine can be considered an overlay of sorts to the more fundamental algorithms used to accomplish client device recommendations (e.g., the “recommendation engine” discussed above).
For example, the OME 200 or client device 206 may invoke certain operational protocols or decision processes based on information or requests received from the device 206, conditions existing within the network, demographic data, geographic data, user preferences, etc. However, these processes may not always be compatible with higher-level business or operational goals, such as maximizing profit or system reliability. Hence, when imposed, the business/operational rules can be used to dynamically (or manually) control the operation of the client process on the client device 206. The rules may be, e.g., operational or business-oriented in nature, and may also be applied selectively in terms of time of day, duration, specific local areas, or even at the individual user level (e.g., via specific identification of the client device 206 via MAC address, IP address, cryptographic hash or digital signature, or the like, or via user-specific or account-specific login).
For example, one rule implemented by the rules engine may comprise only providing certain types or formats of programming to certain subscribers or classes of subscribers, and/or on certain ones of the subscriber's registered devices. As noted previously, these rules may be implemented at the device level (e.g., client device 206), or at the OME 200 (such as by placing information regarding these rules into the database 250). A particular client device 206 may possess an MPEG-4 decoder, for example, but the device 206 may not be recommended for delivery of requested programs rendered in MPEG-4 encoding, unless the subscriber meets certain criteria (e.g., “premium” subscription, etc.). Similarly, if any of the subscriber's registered devices 206 do not possess a required codec, CA keys, DRM, or network interface, recommendation of the device 206 by the evaluation application 412 may be controlled, and/or the download of the missing component/capability may be restricted to only subscribers meeting certain criteria. As indicated above, in one embodiment, information regarding the subscriber subscription level and other factors affecting content delivery, as well as the rules themselves, may be stored at the database 250 and implemented by the OME 200 (or retrieved by the OME, such as from the network BSS).
Another rule might impose a moratorium or restrictions on upstream data or information messages (e.g., SSP) or requests for content from the client devices 206 during conditions of very heavy loading (e.g., until a certain minimum threshold of available bandwidth is present), thereby avoiding contention for bandwidth resources with “premium” services. Similarly, program-related or other processing typically done upstream of the client devices 206 could be dynamically shifted to the devices 206 under such circumstances so as distribute the processing load (and hence upstream messaging bandwidth consumed) to the client devices 206.
The rules engine may further establish that recommendations by the OME 200 (i.e., recommendation engine previously described) may be limited to only certain subscribers and/or certain types of devices 206. For example, the processes of monitoring, evaluating and notifying (as performed by the monitor application 410, evaluation application 412 and notification application 414) may be limited to only those devices having a premium service level. Additionally, the aforementioned services may be limited to only certain ones of a subscriber's devices 206, the additional devices being added to the service at a premium.
Yet another rule might impose restrictions on establishing or allocating new physical channels/QAMs or IP-packetized delivery sessions to the subscriber channel requests based on device 206 profile data (e.g., the presence or lack of a certain required interfaces, codecs, CA, DRM, etc.). As previously discussed, bandwidth/QAM resource allocation and other relevant network considerations may be used as a basis of determining device 206 recommendations in a broadcast switched network. This process can also be made dynamic if desired; such as where QAM loading and similar parameters can be continuously or periodically re-evaluated, and the operation of the network altered accordingly. For example, when sufficient bandwidth is again present, the subscriber of the previous example may be switched over to a program stream associated with the higher bandwidth codec, or allocated an HD session versus SD on the same HD-capable device (with the switch-over being effectively imperceptible to the subscriber).
Still further, the system may be modified such that during instances of increased demand on the network, certain classes of subscribers (e.g., lower tier subscribers) may only be permitted to view content at particular ones of client devices. In other words, as bandwidth demand increases, certain subscribers may no longer be able to view content on certain devices. As a result, when a requesting device 206 requests content, the subscriber may be restricted as to which devices are available, or in the extreme not be given a choice as to which device to receive the requested content on, but rather will be immediately directed to a device selected by the network. Hence, under this paradigm, the user's available device population/delivery mode “matrix” grows and shrinks as a function of network loading.
The present invention also lends itself to various business models in terms of distribution, operation, and service provision. Specifically, by having remote monitoring, configuration and provisioning capability, the service provider (e.g., MSO) is given greater flexibility in, inter alia, (i) troubleshooting and repairing faults within the CPE 106 or other connected premises devices which may otherwise require a service visit; and (ii) changing or reconfiguring a given subscriber's service package or capabilities remotely, again obviating a service visit or actions by the subscriber while simultaneously being able to provide requested content at other ones of the subscriber's devices 206. For example, as previously described, new client devices 206 are immediately updated to a subscriber account (as well as removal of devices), then provided to the database 250, thereby allowing the OME 200 to rapidly switch service options on a per-subscriber or per-device basis (enhancing so-called “service velocity”).
Under the foregoing model, the MSO may also utilize the OME and supporting processes to mitigate service outages for the subscriber. For instance, in one variant, the device population for a given user or subscriber account is periodically or anecdotally scanned and evaluated for the then “best” alternative or second option for the user, based on e.g., the output of the recommendation engine. At any given time, the subscriber may be utilizing the “best” option, and the rules engine could utilize the recommendation engine to rank the available options to periodically determine the second-best option. Hence, when a device failure or other delivery issue of the (then) “best” option occurs, the OME would be primed to immediately swap the subscriber over to the second-best choice at that time, and display a notification (or generate an audible cue, etc) on the then-selected (alternative) platform (and the failed platform, to the degree it is operable to do so) to alert the user as to the switch and why it occurred (e.g., “Malfunction on Option No. 1—Network-imposed Switched to Option 2”, or the like). This approach advantageously maintains subscriber program continuity to the maximum degree possible, rather than having the subscriber staring at a blank of fuzzy screen with no explanation why.
For example, in one implementation, the ROM of each device (e.g., DSTB, gateway, CPD, etc.) might include the aforementioned alert message, so that if it and its associated display are at least marginally functional, the alert could be displayed (rather than having the subscriber have to hunt for which platform was designated “next best” at that moment to find the ongoing program stream).
The foregoing functionality may also be masked by other factors or device considerations, such as sensed availability of alternates at any given time (e.g., only consider then powered-up and registered devices as viable alternatives).
In yet another aspect, the methods and apparatus of the present invention may be tied to additional consideration from the subscriber for changes in service delivery. For example, incremental changes in “service quality” (including e.g., video quality, audio quality, service coverage or reliability, transportability of sessions, access to features (such as e.g., “blended” services such as those described in co-owned U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/256,903 filed on Oct. 30, 2009 entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PACKETIZED CONTENT DELIVERY OVER A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK”, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), access to off-net content, etc.), may be associated with an additional charge. In one variant, an “unlimited” package is offered, wherein the subscriber is given an unlimited number of uses or “upgrades” for an unlimited (within their device capability profile) number of different services, all for an extra monthly premium. Alternatively, a “per use” payment model may be employed, or a finite limit per time period for a given premium. The user may also “barter” for the upgrades in another variant; e.g., such as by exchanging actions (e.g., taking a survey, reviewing a sample advertisement/promotion, etc.) in exchange for the “upgrade(s)” This approach can also be used as a “teaser” for enhancing existing subscriptions; i.e., by offering the subscriber enhanced capabilities for a trial period, they may request an upgrade to their subscription level or addition of the service (for added cost).
Many other approaches and combinations of various operational and business paradigms are envisaged consistent with the invention, as will be recognized by those of ordinary skill when provided this disclosure.
It will be recognized that while certain aspects of the invention are described in terms of a specific sequence of steps of a method, these descriptions are only illustrative of the broader methods of the invention, and may be modified as required by the particular application. Certain steps may be rendered unnecessary or optional under certain circumstances. Additionally, certain steps or functionality may be added to the disclosed embodiments, or the order of performance of two or more steps permuted. All such variations are considered to be encompassed within the invention disclosed and claimed herein.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. The foregoing description is of the best mode presently contemplated of carrying out the invention. This description is in no way meant to be limiting, but rather should be taken as illustrative of the general principles of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/659,268 of the same title, filed on Oct. 21, 2019 and issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 11,563,995 on Jan. 24, 2023, which is a divisional of and claims priority to co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/376,306 of the same title, filed on Dec. 12, 2016 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,455,262 on Oct. 22, 2019, which is a divisional of and claims priority to co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/631,713 of the same title, filed on Dec. 4, 2009 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,519,728 on Dec. 13, 2016, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Additionally, this application is generally related to the subject matter of co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/536,724 filed on Aug. 6, 2009 and entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING ENTITLEMENTS TO DATA OVER A NETWORK”, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,341,242 on Dec. 25, 2012, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/256,903 filed on Oct. 30, 2009 and entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PACKETIZED CONTENT DELIVERY OVER A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/764,746 of the same title as U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/256,903 filed on Apr. 21, 2010, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5410344 | Graves et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5528284 | Iwami et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534911 | Levitan | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5557319 | Gurusami et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5628284 | Sheen et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5708961 | Hylton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5745837 | Fuhrmann | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5758257 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5818438 | Howe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5822530 | Brown | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5838921 | Speeter | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5897635 | Torres et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5940738 | Rao | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5999535 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6125397 | Yoshimura et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6167432 | Jiang | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6181697 | Nurenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6219710 | Gray et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233389 | Barton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6259701 | Shur et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6286049 | Rajakarunanayake et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6317884 | Eames et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6345038 | Selinger | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6389538 | Gruse et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6396531 | Gerszberg et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6473793 | Dillon et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6519062 | Yoo | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6523696 | Saito et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6546016 | Gerszberg et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6564381 | Hodge et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6640145 | Hoffberg et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6642938 | Gilboy | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6642939 | Vallone et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6643262 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6694145 | Riikonen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6711742 | Kishi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6718552 | Goode | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6748395 | Picker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754904 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757906 | Look et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6774926 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6788676 | Partanen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6847778 | Vallone et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6865746 | Herrington et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6909726 | Sheeran | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6918131 | Rautila et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6925257 | Yoo | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931018 | Fisher | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6934964 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6944150 | McConnell et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6973489 | Levy | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6978474 | Sheppard et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 7003670 | Heaven et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006881 | Hoffberg et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
| 7009972 | Maher et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7013290 | Ananian | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7020652 | Matz et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7027460 | Iyer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7039048 | Monta et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7051352 | Schaffer | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7054902 | Toporek et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7055031 | Platt | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7055165 | Connelly | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7068639 | Varma et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7096483 | Johnson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099308 | Merrill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7100183 | Kunkel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103905 | Novak | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7106382 | Shiotsu | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7143168 | DiBiasio et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7146627 | Ismail et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7149772 | Kalavade | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7167895 | Connelly | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7174126 | McElhatten et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7174127 | Otten et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7174385 | Li | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7185355 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7206775 | Kaiser et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7207055 | Hendricks et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7209458 | Ahvonen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7213036 | Apparao et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228556 | Beach et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7242960 | Van et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7242988 | Hoffberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7254608 | Yeager et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7257106 | Chen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7260823 | Schlack et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7293276 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7312391 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7325043 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7325073 | Shao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7330483 | Peters, Jr. et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
| 7330510 | Castillo et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333483 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7336787 | Unger et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337458 | Michelitsch et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7340762 | Kim | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7359375 | Lipsanen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363643 | Drake et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7376386 | Phillips et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7382786 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7406515 | Joyce et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7444655 | Sardera | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7457520 | Rosetti et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7486869 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7487523 | Hendricks | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7532712 | Gonder et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7548562 | Ward et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7567983 | Pickelsimer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7571452 | Gutta | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7592912 | Hasek et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7602820 | Helms et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7609637 | Doshi et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7624337 | Sull et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7650319 | Hoffberg et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7690020 | Lebar | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7693171 | Gould | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7721314 | Sincaglia et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7725553 | Rang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7742074 | Minatogawa | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7770200 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7805453 | Ostrover et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7809942 | Baran et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7870245 | Butler | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7893171 | Le et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7900052 | Jonas et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7908626 | Williamson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7916755 | Hasek et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7936775 | Iwamura | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7954131 | Cholas et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8042054 | White et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8095610 | Gould et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8099757 | Riedl et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8166126 | Bristow et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8170065 | Hasek et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8219134 | Maharajh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8249497 | Ingrassia et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8281352 | Brooks et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8341242 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8347341 | Markley et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8429702 | Yasrebi et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8484511 | Engel et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8516529 | LaJoie et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8520850 | Helms et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8583758 | Casey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8738607 | Dettinger et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8750490 | Murtagh et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8750909 | Fan et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8805270 | Maharajh et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8949919 | Cholas et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8995815 | Maharajh et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9124608 | Jin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9124650 | Maharajh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9215423 | Kimble et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9357247 | Cronk et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9519728 | Rieger et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9531760 | Lajoie et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9906838 | Cronk et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 10264029 | Lajoie et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 20010004768 | Hodge et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043613 | Wibowo et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010050945 | Lindsey | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020002688 | Gregg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020024943 | Karaul et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020027883 | Belaiche | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032754 | Logston et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042921 | Ellis | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053076 | Landesmann | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056125 | Hodge et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059218 | August et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020059619 | Lebar | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020066033 | Dobbins et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020083451 | Gill et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087995 | Pedlow et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095689 | Novak | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123931 | Splaver et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131511 | Zenoni | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020144267 | Gutta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147771 | Traversat et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152091 | Nagaoka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152299 | Traversat et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020178444 | Trajkovic et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188744 | Mani | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188869 | Patrick | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194595 | Miller et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005453 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030012190 | Kaku et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028451 | Ananian | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030056217 | Brooks | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093794 | Thomas et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097574 | Upton | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115267 | Hinton et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135628 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163443 | Wang | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165241 | Fransdonk | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166401 | Combes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200548 | Baran et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030208767 | Williamson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217137 | Roese et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217365 | Caputo | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220100 | McElhatten et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040034677 | Davey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034877 | Nogues | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045032 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045035 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045037 | Cummings et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117254 | Nemirofsky et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133923 | Watson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137918 | Varonen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040166832 | Portman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040174900 | Volpi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230994 | Urdang et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250273 | Swix et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050034171 | Benya | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050049886 | Grannan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055220 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055729 | Atad et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050083921 | McDermott, III et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086334 | Aaltonen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086683 | Meyerson | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108763 | Baran et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114701 | Atkins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114900 | Ladd et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157731 | Peters | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165899 | Mazzola | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177855 | Maynard et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050188415 | Riley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223097 | Ramsayer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228725 | Rao et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289616 | Horiuchi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289618 | Hardin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060020786 | Helms et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021004 | Moran et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021019 | Hinton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041905 | Wasilewski | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041915 | Dimitrova et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047957 | Helms et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053463 | Choi | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060088030 | Beeson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095331 | O'Malley | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095410 | Ostrover et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095940 | Yearwood | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117379 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130099 | Rooyen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130101 | Wessel | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130107 | Gonder et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130113 | Carlucci et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136964 | Diez et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136968 | Han et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149850 | Bowman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060156392 | Baugher et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161635 | Lamkin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060171423 | Helms et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187900 | Akbar | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206712 | Dillaway et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209799 | Gallagher et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060218604 | Riedl et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060221246 | Yoo | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060238656 | Chen et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248553 | Mikkelson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259927 | Acharya et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291506 | Cain | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070019645 | Menon | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022459 | Gaebel, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022469 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070025271 | Niedrich et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070025372 | Brenes et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070033531 | Marsh | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049245 | Lipman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053513 | Hoffberg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070061023 | Hoffberg, I et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070067851 | Fernando et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073704 | Bowden et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076728 | Rieger et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070081537 | Wheelock | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070094691 | Gazdzinski | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100981 | Adamczyk et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118848 | Schwesinger et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121578 | Annadata et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121678 | Brooks et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124488 | Baum et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124769 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070124781 | Casey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150920 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153775 | Renschler | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153820 | Gould | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070154041 | Beauchamp | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157234 | Walker | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157262 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162945 | Mills | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180230 | Cortez | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204300 | Markley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070204314 | Hasek et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209054 | Cassanova | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209059 | Moore et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070217436 | Markley et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219910 | Martinez | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070220575 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070226365 | Hildreth et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070245376 | Svendsen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250880 | Hainline | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261116 | Prafullchandra et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276925 | La et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276926 | LaJoie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070280298 | Hearn et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288637 | Layton et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288715 | Boswell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294717 | Hill et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294738 | Kuo et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299728 | Nemirofsky et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080021836 | Lao | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022012 | Wang | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080049648 | Liu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080056128 | Joyce et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080059804 | Shah et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080066112 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086750 | Yasrebi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091805 | Malaby et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080091807 | Strub et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080092163 | Song et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080092181 | Britt | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098212 | Helms et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098450 | Wu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080112405 | Cholas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133551 | Wensley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080137541 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155059 | Hardin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080162353 | Tom et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080170530 | Connors et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080170551 | Zaks | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177998 | Apsangi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080192820 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195664 | Maharajh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201386 | Maharajh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080201748 | Hasek et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222684 | Mukraj et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080235746 | Peters et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263648 | Sathyan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273591 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080279534 | Buttars | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281971 | Leppanen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282299 | Koat et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297669 | Zalewski et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306903 | Larson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080307429 | Fontaine et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080320523 | Morris et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090010271 | Bachmann et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090013356 | Doerr et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030802 | Plotnick et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031335 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090063301 | Ward et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090064221 | Stevens | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083279 | Hasek | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083811 | Dolce et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083813 | Dolce et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086643 | Kotrla et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090086722 | Kaji | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090098861 | Kalliola et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100459 | Riedl et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100493 | Jones et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090111456 | Shaffer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090133048 | Gibbs et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090141696 | Chou et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144438 | Montpetit | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150553 | Collart et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090150917 | Huffman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090151006 | Saeki et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090158311 | Hon et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172776 | Makagon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090175218 | Song et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090185576 | Kisel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187939 | LaJoie | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193486 | Patel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090196268 | Caldwell et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090201917 | Maes et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210899 | Lawrence-Apfelbaum et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090210912 | Cholas et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090225760 | Foti | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235308 | Ehlers et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282241 | Prafullchandra et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282449 | Lee | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090291631 | Xue et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293101 | Carter et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090296621 | Park et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100012568 | Fujisawa et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100027560 | Yang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100030578 | Siddique et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100031299 | Harrang et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100042478 | Reisman | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100043030 | White | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083329 | Joyce et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100083362 | Francisco et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100106846 | Noldus et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115091 | Park et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100115113 | Short et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122274 | Gillies et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100122276 | Chen | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125658 | Strasters | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100131973 | Dillon et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100134338 | Belz et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138900 | Peterka et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100169977 | Dasher et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100199299 | Chang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100199312 | Chang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100202368 | Hans | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100217613 | Kelly | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100218231 | Frink et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100219613 | Zaloom et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251304 | Donoghue et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100251305 | Kimble et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100269144 | Forsman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280641 | Harkness et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100287609 | Gonzalez et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100313225 | Cholas et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100325547 | Keng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110015989 | Tidwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016479 | Tidwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110016482 | Tidwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035072 | Jackson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071841 | Fomenko et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110090898 | Patel et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093900 | Patel et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099017 | Ure | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110102600 | Todd | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110103374 | LaJoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110107379 | LaJoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110107389 | Chakarapani | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110110515 | Tidwell et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126018 | Narsinh et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138064 | Rieger et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110145049 | Hertel et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161409 | Nair et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110166932 | Smith et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173053 | Aaltonen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173095 | Kassaei et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110178943 | Motahari et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191801 | Vytheeswaran | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213688 | Santos et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219229 | Cholas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110265116 | Stern et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110276881 | Keng et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120005527 | Engel et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120011567 | Cronk et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023535 | Brooks | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120030363 | Conrad | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120124606 | Tidwell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120144416 | Wetzer et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185899 | Riedl et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20130014140 | Ye et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130014171 | Sansom et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130024888 | Sivertsen | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130046849 | Wolf et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130097647 | Brooks et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117692 | Padmanabhan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20140074855 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20150040176 | Hybertson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150095932 | Ren | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150113571 | Cholas et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20160088327 | Cronk et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20170155941 | Rieger et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20190312915 | LaJoie | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102812450 | Dec 2016 | CN |
| 1821459 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 2081361 | Jul 2009 | EP |
| 2494462 | Sep 2012 | EP |
| 2001275090 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2005519365 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005519501 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005339093 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2008015936 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 2009211632 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 2010502109 | Jan 2010 | JP |
| 2010079902 | Apr 2010 | JP |
| 2012505436 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2012523614 | Oct 2012 | JP |
| WO-0110125 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO-2005015422 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005031524 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO-2007060451 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO-2011053858 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO-2012021245 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012114140 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Alcatel., “Delivering True Triple Play—Common Capabilities for the Delivery of Composite Services”, Internet Citation, Jun. 2006 (Jun. 2006), XP002418653, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/tripleplay [retrieved on Feb. 6, 2007]. |
| Cantor., et al., “Bindings for the Oasis Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2.0,”Oasis Standard, Mar. 2005, DocumentID saml-bindings-2.0-os, ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-bindings-2.0-os.pdf ), 46 pages. |
| DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) protocols described in DLNA Networked Device Interoperability Guidelines Expanded, Mar. 2006 and subsequent expanded version dated Oct. 2006, 23 pages. |
| Florin L., et al., “Content Delivery and Management in Networked MPEG-4 System,” 2000 10th European Signal Processing Conference, IEEE, Sep. 4, 2000 (Sep. 4, 2000), pp. 1-4, XP032755920, ISBN: 978-952-15-0443-3 [retrieved on Mar. 31, 2015]. |
| OpenCable, Enhanced TV Binary Interchange, Format 1.0 OC-SP-ETV-BIF1.0-104-070921 Date: Sep. 21, 2007, 420 pages. |
| Pantjiaros C.A. P., et al., “Broadband Service Delivery: CY.T.A. ADSL Field Trial Experience”, Electrotechnical Conference, 2000 MELECON, 2000 10th Mediterranean, May 29-31, 2000, Piscataway, NJ, USA,IEEE, vol. 1, May 29, 2000 (May 29, 2000), pp. 221-224, XP010518859, ISBN: 978-0-7803-6290-1. |
| Redux Screenshot from http://www.redux.com , “Select a Channel to Start Watching” © 2014 Redux, Inc.014 Redux, Inc. All rights reserved; http://www.redux.com/ , 2 pages. |
| Siebenlist F., et al., “Global Grid Forum Specification Roadmap towards a Secure OGSA,” Jul. 2002, pp. 1-22. |
| UTF-32, IBM, retrieved from http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=%2Fnls%2Frbagsutf32.htm on Aug. 28, 2013, 1 page. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230164373 A1 | May 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15376306 | Dec 2016 | US |
| Child | 16659268 | US | |
| Parent | 12631713 | Dec 2009 | US |
| Child | 15376306 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16659268 | Oct 2019 | US |
| Child | 18100122 | US |
