A. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to accessing a network, and in particular to apparatus and methods for accessing a network using the television as a display device.
B. Description of the Prior Art
A typical home computer today is comprised of hardware and software. The hardware includes a processor, hard drive, modem, monitor, RAM, keyboard, and mouse. The software includes an operating system and application programs. For many users the processing power of a home computer is more than sufficient to meet their needs. Home computers are used in a variety of ways. Many users use word processing and spreadsheet applications, while others perform tasks that require more significant processing power, such as graphics processing. More and more are using their computers to access the Internet, and in particular the World Wide Web (WWW).
Users connect to the Internet and the WWW using a modem. The modem is typically a 28.8 bps modem, and each computer is equipped with a Web browser. The user runs the Web browser, which provides a graphical interface for retrieving Web pages. Once the Web browser is up and running, the user requests the Web browser to retrieve a particular Web page. Most Web browsers allow a user to maintain a “hotlist” of “hotlinks” (i.e., bookmarks) to favorite Web sites. The hotlist is typically implemented as a pull down menu containing Web site addresses previously saved by the user.
The user provides an address to the Web browser using either the hotlist or by typing the address in by hand. The address identifies a Web page location. The Web browser then connects to the network (if not already connected), and retrieves the Web page at the address.
Once a Web page is retrieved it is presented to the user. The user may request further Web pages by selecting a hyperlink on the retrieved page, or by inputting another Web page address. The user selects hyperlinks by manipulating an input device, typically a mouse. The mouse is the primary input device for Web browser, and some of the mouse selections may be supplemented by simple text operations and use of the “Enter” key.
For many people, the cost of a home computer or similar hardware (e.g., a unit(s) including both a television and components of a home computer) is prohibitive, or impractical for their needs. Even for those who have computers, however, Internet access can often be frustratingly slow. Users are usually constrained by modem speeds which make Internet access slow. Faster access could be provided over T1 or ISDN lines, but the costs of such lines is usually prohibitive for most users.
Therefore, while many are interested in the WWW, they cannot justify buying a computer for this purpose alone. Other who can justify the cost can not justify the cost of connecting to a high speed line.
The present invention relates to apparatus and methods for accessing a network, such as the WWW, using a television and low cost set top box. It should be understood that while the discussion below discusses the invention in terms of the Internet, it is also contemplated that the principles described herein could also be applied to other networks, such as intranets.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is an apparatus for retrieving and retransmitting data processing network information in response to a user selection request. The apparatus comprises means for transmitting first selection information to be displayed on a monitor; means for receiving a user selection request based on the transmitted first selection information; means for retrieving data processing network information, in a network format, corresponding to the user selection request; means for transforming the data processing network information from the network format having a first interactive element to a monitor format having a second interactive element; and means for transmitting the data processing network information in the monitor format to the monitor.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
In a preferred embodiment, server 110 is located at source end of a television signal, such as a cable system. For example, server 110 may be located at the headend of a television distribution system. Alternatively, server 110 may be located at some other location on the television distribution line. For example, server 110 may be located in an apartment building or hotel between an incoming television distribution line and set top boxes 112. In this manner, “local” Internet access is provided. Moreover, server 110 may perform functions in addition to providing Internet access. For example, server 110 may be dedicated to providing Internet access to set top boxes 112. Alternatively, server 110 may also receive a regular television distribution signal for transmission to set top boxes 112, and provide Internet-related signals or other programming, depending upon the channel selection by the user.
Set top box 112 also receives and responds to signals from user interface 116. The signals may be communicated to Internet gateway video server 110. In a preferred embodiment, user interface 116 comprises an infrared remote control interface for receiving signals from a remote control device (not shown). User interface 116 may comprise any well known user interface capable of providing selection signals to set top box 112.
Internet gateway video server 110 receives signals from set top box 112 and responds to the signals by (1) interacting with the Internet, or (2) sending video signals for processing by set top box 112 for display on television 114. Server 110 is connected to a high-speed communication line, such as a T1 or ISDN line. Server 110 transmits information generated locally by server 110, or information received from the Internet, to television 114. Server 110 also performs housekeeping functions, such as logging time, in response to information received from the network and signals received from set top box 112.
Set top box 112 may process the information received from server 110, or send it directly to television 114. A user views information displayed on television 114 and, using user interface 116, inputs selection information based on what is displayed. Some or all of the user selection signals may be transmitted by set top box 112 to the Internet gateway video server 110. Signals sent from set top box 112 to server 110 include an identification of the set top box 112 and the user selection. Other information may also be provided depending upon the particular implementation of the set top box 112 and server 110.
In response to the user selection signals, server 110 either prepares information locally and transmits the information to set top box 112, or accesses the network for the information requested in the user selection signals. Set top box 112 may process some or all of the user selection signals. For example, set top box 112 may alter the display, and send notification of this change to server 110.
Set top box 112 may be implemented in accordance with the principles similar to those set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,758 to Lin et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference. The box 112 may be implemented with a built in frame store which continually refreshes the television. A simple set top box 112 may perform little or no processing at all, acting as merely a sample and hold device for the server 110.
In response to user selection signals, session manager 214 either responds directly to the user selection signals or requests translation of the user selection signals by user selection interpreter 210. Interpreter 210 translates user selection signals into Web page addresses. The Web page addresses are sent to manager 214.
In response to the translation, session manager 214 requests Web browser 222 to retrieve a Web page from the network via network interface 226. Once the Web page has been received, it is sent to session manager 214, which requests translation of the Web page by web page translator 218. After translation, the results are transferred to manager 214. Manager 214 then passes at least part of the translated Web page to the set top box 112 associated with the user request.
Session manager 214 keeps track of the multiple users requesting information via the set top boxes 112. User requests are logged and tracked, and presentation information for each set top box 112 is managed in response to the user requests. This may require caching of particular display information to optimize response time to user requests. In summary, session manager 214 and Web browser 222 together form a multi-user Web browser capable of simultaneously managing multiple user sessions on multiple set top boxes 112.
The system may be implemented by having a single centralized cache for all users. In this way, the cache may contain frequently used pages for all users. Each time a request is made for a Web page the cache is checked before the Web page is retrieved. In this embodiment, it is preferable to have a time out mechanism for the cache to remove old Web pages which may have become stale. Similarly, a single user session table 330 for all users could be used, as discussed in greater detail below with respect to
In another preferred embodiment, hotlinks are not stored for later use. Each time a user logs on they are presented with the same predefined menu. The predefined menu may be unique to that user, or the same menu may be presented to all users. This embodiment is simpler because hotlinks are not stored for later use. Yet another preferred embodiment has a combination of predefined menus, identical each time they are presented to the user, and user-defined menus which a particular user may create and alter according to that user's own preferences.
Menu preferences 322 include user-selectable options regarding the content of a main menu (see
A user inputs one of the displayed selection numbers into an infrared remote control which transmits selection signals to set top box 112. As described above, set top box 112 and server 110 respond accordingly based on the user selection signals. The main menu shown in
If the user selects a WWW page, the user Web page selection is translated into an Internet address (step 626). Server 110 retrieves the Web page associated with the translated Internet address (step 630). The Web page is then processed to transform the Web-based format into signals suitable for display on television 114 (step 634). The processed Web page is then transmitted to television 114 via set top box 112 and displayed to the user (step 638).
Alternatively, the Web-based information could be delivered directly to set top box 112 for conversion into television signals at the set top box 112. This would relieve the load of server 110, but require much greater processing power in the set top box 112.
If a hyperlink is detected, information such as a number, letter or symbol, is inserted into the HTML page near the hyperlink, thus assigning numbers or other symbols to hyperlinks (step 714). When the HTML page is later converted into RGB computer graphics, and subsequently into NTCS format, the inserted information will also be translated into visual indicia corresponding to the hyperlink. For example, when the first hyperlink is detected a “1” might be inserted into the HTML document near the first hyperlink. When the second hyperlink is detected a “2” is inserted into the HTML document. Therefore, the original contents of the HTML document are augmented with additional visual indicia corresponding to each hyperlink.
The information developed from the scan of the Web page is also used to form a table that contains the correspondence between the inserted information and the associated hyperlink. The table is used to translate requests received from the user into hyperlink information.
The HTML document is then converted into RGB computer graphics, and subsequently translated into NTSC format, as is understood in the art. This process may include translation of graphics information into a format suitable for display on the television. For example, fonts and font sizes may be translated.
The Web page is then logically divided into a first display page in accordance with the size of the television display screen (step 718). From this translated information and division into a logical display page, a video display appropriate for television 114 is created (step 722). Finally, the translated Web page is displayed (step 726). Because an entire Web page may not be displayable on a single television screen, the user may scroll or page through the Web page by requesting server 110 for further scrolled or paged portions of the page.
The information defining the correspondence between hyperlinks in the retrieved Web page and the select information which is displayed is user later to translate the user selection information back into a hyperlink, or network location. The session manager ensures that the appropriate data structures for creating user selections and translating them back into hyperlinks is available to the system processes which utilize these data structures.
In this manner, the user input operates to select information in a manner similar to selection of a hyperlink as normally used in computer-generated Web pages. Note also option bar 822 which presents navigation options to the user. The navigation options allow a user to move to other areas of the currently displayed Web page (denoted by “A” and “B”), add the current Web page as a new hotlink selection to the main menu show in
In response to a user selecting one of the hyperlinks using a device such as a remote control, a signal is sent by user interface 116 to set top box 112, which processes the signal, sends a signal to server 110, or both responds to the signal and passes it on. In response to a user selection of a particular hyperlink, server 110 sets up a network connection to retrieve the selected Web page. In response to a user selecting one of the option bar 822 options, a signal is sent in a similar manner to server 110 via set top box 112. In this instance, however, information is generated locally by Internet gateway video server 110 for display on TV 114. Alternatively, the set top box 112 may handle the response to the menu option bar 822.
System controller 910 also communicates with several of the system elements via control and communication lines 918. Control and communication lines 918 may be implemented, for example, using an RS-232 type interface. System controller 910 controls interactive laser disc players 922, movie library 926, JPEG frame store and VBI controller 930, and Web browser 942. JPEG frame store and Vertical Blanking Interval (VBI) controller 930 and Web browser 942 place information on the coaxial cable via frame addressing device (VBI) 934. In this embodiment, Web browser 942 carries out the functions of session manager 214 and Web browser 226 of
Web browser 942 sends signals to VGA to TV adaptor 948, which in turn sends signals to time base corrector 952 for transmission to frame addressing device 934. VGA to TV adaptor 948 converts computer output data into NTSC scan lines. The adaptor may be implemented using, for example, a Magnicorder® device. Time base corrector 952 may be implemented using, for example, a Hotronics® time base corrector, or similar device.
Similarly, JPEG frame store and VBI controller 930 sends signals to time-base corrector 938, which in turn sends signals to frame addressing device 934. Frame addressing device 934 also receives control signals from JPEG frame store and VBI controller 930. Finally, frame addressing device 934 receives signals from other frame-based servers, such as video games, indicated generally by 956. In summary, frame addressing device transmits signals from multiple video sources, indicated generally by 960.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a user sends selection signals to a set top box 112 which are, in turn, transmitted on coaxial cable 956, via two-way communication data path 914, to system controller 910. Controller 910 takes the user selection signals and processes them to control the various video sources of information. With respect to the preferred embodiment, system controller 910 sends selection signals to Web browser 942, which initiates retrieval of the requested Web page via ISDN modem 944.
Although
The present invention thus allows multiple users to access the Internet, or other networks, via a high speed channel using only a set top box 112 and television. It provides users with a variety of advantages. For example, users no longer must have a personal computer in their home to access the Internet. The invention also allows users to access the WWW from their television sets. The only costs associated with such an architecture are those of the set top box 112 and remote. Homes with cable TV already require similar devices. The present invention also circumvents the need to interact with the menus and WWW using a mouse tethered to a device. Users can view the WWW with the ease of a remote control. Various modifications and variations can be made in the set top box 112 of the present invention and in construction of this server without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosed embodiments. The specification and examples are exemplary only, and the true scope and spirit of the invention is defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/853,035, filed May 2, 1997 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,381,748. The benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 USC §120 is claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4780758 | Lin et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4816905 | Tweedy et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5319455 | Hoarty | Jun 1994 | A |
5410698 | Danneels et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5481542 | Logston et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488412 | Majeti et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499046 | Schiller et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512935 | Majeti et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526034 | Hoarty et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534913 | Majeti et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537141 | Harper et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5550578 | Hoarty et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5557541 | Schulhof et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561708 | Remillard | Oct 1996 | A |
5572442 | Schulhof | Nov 1996 | A |
5572517 | Safadi | Nov 1996 | A |
5574964 | Hamlin | Nov 1996 | A |
5586121 | Moura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594490 | Dawson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594491 | Hodge et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5612730 | Lewis | Mar 1997 | A |
5616876 | Cluts | Apr 1997 | A |
5617565 | Augenbraun et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619274 | Roop et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624265 | Redford et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5654886 | Zereski et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5708845 | Wistendahl et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5745909 | Perlman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748255 | Johnson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761606 | Wolzien | Jun 1998 | A |
5774664 | Hidary et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774666 | Portuesi | Jun 1998 | A |
5778181 | Hidary et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5818935 | Maa | Oct 1998 | A |
5844552 | Gaughan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850218 | LaJoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5883661 | Hoarty | Mar 1999 | A |
5895462 | Toki | Apr 1999 | A |
5896444 | Perlman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903816 | Broadwin et al. | May 1999 | A |
5918013 | Mighdoll et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929849 | Kikinis | Jul 1999 | A |
5929850 | Broadwin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961603 | Kunkel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973681 | Tanigawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982445 | Eyer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990927 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991800 | Burke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999970 | Krisbergh et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002394 | Schein et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005563 | White et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006256 | Zdepski et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018764 | Field et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018768 | Ullman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6034689 | White et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049831 | Gardell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6076166 | Moshfeghi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6118472 | Dureau et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141693 | Perlman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144376 | Connelly | Nov 2000 | A |
6169541 | Smith | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182072 | Leak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184877 | Dodson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184878 | Alonso et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6233736 | Wolzien | May 2001 | B1 |
6240555 | Shoff et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6275989 | Broadwin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305020 | Hoarty et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311197 | Mighdoll et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6330595 | Ullman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6493876 | DeFreese et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496981 | Wistendahl et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6631523 | Matthews et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6772433 | LaJoie et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6941574 | Broadwin et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6963906 | Portuesi | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7237252 | Billmaier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7404010 | Gardell et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7409437 | Ullman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7546621 | LaJoie et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577978 | Wistendahl et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7665109 | Matthews et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20020056136 | Wistendahl et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20040055018 | Stone | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050015804 | LaJoie et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060259940 | Fries | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070067805 | Macrae et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080275987 | Gardell et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090241144 | Lajoie et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100118187 | Macrae et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2251085 | Mar 2005 | CA |
811 940 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1569453 | Aug 2005 | EP |
9009160 | Jan 1997 | JP |
WO-9300694 | Jan 1993 | WO |
9515658 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9534170 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO-9712342 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO-9800975 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO-9800976 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO-9832076 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-9837694 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-9837695 | Aug 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Tomari, Y. et al., Design and Implementation of Internet-TV, IEEE Trans. on Consumer Electronics, IEEE Inc. New York, US, vol. 43, No. 3, Aug. 1, 1997, pp. 953-959 XP000742584 ISSN: 0098-3063. |
WEBTV Networks Inc., WEBTV and Its Consumer Electronics Licensees Debut First Internet Television Network and Set-Top Box, Jul. 10, 1996, Internet XP002086521. |
WEBTV-News; “Pricing, Features Set of Innovative WebTV Network Online Service”, Sep. 4, 1996, Internet, http://sunyskyz.com/webtv/ns/corporate/media/pricing.html. |
“Analysts Question Idea of ‘Net in the Living Room’ TV Linkups Will Appeal Only to a Fraction of Web Users,” Interactive Video News, vol. 4, No. 24, four pages, Nov. 25, 1996. |
“CD-Online The Internet on Your TV Set,” M2 Presswire, two pages, Oct. 19, 1995. |
“Commission Opinion,” Sep. 23, 2011. |
“Declaration of Eric Lin,” Aug. 16, 2011. |
“Declaration of Howard S. K. Wan,” Aug. 17, 2011. |
“Declaration of Kenneth M. Fetterman,” Aug. 17, 2011. |
“Former Apple Multimedia Pioneers Unveil WEBTV; New Company Brings Internet to Television Viewers,” PR Newswire, seven pages, Jul. 12, 1996. |
“Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond,” May 20, 2011. |
“Internet Terminal: MAT960 Owner's Manual,” Philips Consumer Electronics Company and Web TV Networks, Inc., 40 pages, Copyright 1998. |
“Internet Terminal: Operating Instructions,” INT-W100, Sony Corporation, pp. 1-36, Copyright 1996. |
“Memorandum in Support of Verizon's Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment,” Aug. 18, 2011. |
“Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment Based on Newly discovered Evidence is Denied,” Nov. 6, 2011. |
“Memorandum Order: Defendants' Motion for Partial Reconsideration is Denied,” Jun. 30, 2011,. |
“Microsoft and WebTV Networks to Collaborate on Internet Television Browsing for the Masses; Microsoft Makes Minority Equity Investment in Innovative Start-Up,” PR Newswire, two pages, Sep. 30, 1996. |
“On the Internet Without a PC,” The New York Times, two pages, Oct. 4, 1995. |
“Oracle Plans a PC With Video Feature,” The New York Times, Section D; p. 2; col. 4; Business/Financial Desk, Oct. 6, 1995. |
“Philips & Sony to Deliver WebTV Device This Fall,” Newsbytes, two pages, Jul. 10, 1996. |
“Philips Announced U.S. Set-Top Internet Browser; South Hall Booth 9301,” PR Newswire, two pages, May 14, 1996. |
“Philips Consumer Electronics Company Brings Internet Access to American Television Consumer; Magnavox WebTV Fast, Easy Way to Access Internet Over Television Receiver,” PR Newswire, two pages, Jul. 10, 1996. |
“Philips Consumer Electronics Company Debuts Philips/Magnavox WebTV; Internet Access Through Television Available at Retail in Fall,” PR Newswire, five pages, Aug. 7, 1996. |
“Philips Readies U.S. Net Browser,” Electronic Engineering Times, one page, May 20, 1996. |
“Philips to Give Net Access Through TV'S,” CNET News.com, http://news.cnet.com/Philips-to-give-Net-access-through-TVs/2100-1023—3-212091.html, one page, May 14, 1996. |
“Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment Based on Newly Discovered Evidence,” Aug. 18, 2011. |
“Sony and Philips License Web TV Set-top Box,” Consumer Electronics, vol. 36, No, 29; p. 11, Jul. 15, 1996. |
“Sony and Philips License WebTV Technology Suite,” Business Wire, three pages, Jul. 10, 1996. |
“Sony Slates Sep. to Bring the Internet to the Television; At Under.$350, Company Expects Strong Demand For Sony WebTV Intemet Terminal,” PR Newswire, three pages, Aug. 26, 1996. |
“Sony to Offer Set-top Box for Television Internet Access by the Fall; Company Enters Technology Agreement with WebTV,” Business Wire, one page, Jul. 10, 1996. |
“Thomson Sun Does Net on Set-Tops,” Multimedia Futures, Dec. 23, 1996. |
“Thomson Sun Interactive to Provide Internet Access via Digital Set-top Box,” Business Wire, two pages, Dec. 11, 1996. |
“Threat to Security?; WebTV Runs into Export Problems as Shipments.are Said to Violate Law,” Communications Daily, one page, Oct. 22, 1996. |
“Web TV Networks Founders Announce Management Team in Preparation for Fall Introduction of Revolutionary Set-top Box, On-line Service,” Business Wire, three pages, Sep. 17, 1996. |
“WebTV Announces Video Technology Breakthrough; Software Upgrade to Bring TV-Quality Video to WebTV Subscribers,” Business Wire, two pages, Jan. 8, 1997. |
“WebTV Exports Banned Under Encryption Rules,” Audio Week, two pages, Oct. 28, 1996. |
“WebTV Networks Announces Array of New Investors for National Launch; WebTV Internet Technology Strikes Chord with Investment Community,” Business Wire, three pages, Sep. 30, 1996. |
“WebTV Networks Pricing, Features Set for Innovative WebTV Network On-line Service,” M2 Presswire, four pages, Sep. 5, 1996. |
“WebTV Takes Aim at Mass Market Internet Week,” three pages, Jun. 17, 1996. |
ALSOP, “Distributed Thinking; WebTV's Integration of Television and the Web is Clever and Priced Right,”InfoWorld, five pages, Jul. 15, 1996. |
Arthur, “Internet Hardware: Who Needs a Computer When You Can Surf From Your Sofa?; All It Takes is a TV, a CD-i Player—and Philips' New Internet Connection Kit,” The Independent, two pages, Oct. 16, 1995. |
Calem, “Tune in to WebTV to Avoid ‘Plug and Play’ PC Hassles Simple Computer Hooks,” The Star-Ledger, four pages, Nov. 27, 1996. |
Chiang, “Internet and World Wide Web Technologies and Opportunities,” Proceedings of The IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 1996 (ICIT'96), pp. 858-862, Dec. 2-6, 1996. |
Einstein, “WebTV Puts Internet Into Family Room,” The San Francisco.Chronicle, Business Section P. D1, Jun. 15, 1996. |
Gelmis, “Plug & Play/Cursing the Entertainment Highway/Connections Net TV/New Devices are Merging Video-game, TV Technology to Bring More Homes Online,” Newsday, three pages, Jun. 23, 1996. |
Goldberg, “ICTV Remains Flexible, Sees Dollars with Cable, Upstart's ‘Virtual PC’ Interactive Service Puts Focus in Headend,” Phillips Business Information's Interactive Video News, p. 5, Jan. 20, 1997. |
Hettrick, “Philips Sees Hope for CD-i in Cheap Link to Net Talk of DVD Role for Interactive TV,” The Hollywood Reporter, two pages, Feb. 12, 1996. |
Hirsch, “American Bell Unveils Videotex Terminal But Software Could Make It Obsolete,” Computerworld Inc., three pages, Jul. 4, 1983. |
Jones, “Internet Access via Cable TV: High Speed Access to the Information Highway,” Digital Equipment Corporation, 1995 NCTA Technical Papers, pp. 398-413, Copyright 1995. |
Karpinski, “ICTV Lauds Network Approach to Interactive TV,” Telephony, vol. 226, Issue 5, p. 18, Jan. 31, 1994. |
Kehoe, “‘Network Computers’ Take on the PCs: ‘Bare-bones Internet Terminals’ Could Be On the Market for Next Christmas—with US$500 Pricetags,” The Financial Post, two pages, Nov. 16, 1995. |
Kroeker, “Making the ‘New Media Appliance’ Smarter: Bandai, Katz, JCC, and Philips Go CD-ROM/online Native,” ISSN:1049-0833, CD-ROM Professional, vol. 9, No. 9, two pages, Sep. 1996. |
Lewis, “Personal Computers; TV Screen Opens Onto Internet,” The New York Times, Section C; p. 8; col. 4; Science Desk, Oct. 22, 1996. |
McCarthy, “Web to the Sofa, WebTV Channels the Internet into America's Living Room,” Telephony, ISSN:0040-2656, two pages, Sep. 7, 1996. |
McIntosh, “Philips Plugs Internet Straight into Your Telly,” The Australian, two pages, Oct. 24, 1995. |
Mossberg, “WebTV Lets Couch Potatoes Go Cyber Surfing,” Capital Times, three pages, Sep. 21, 1996. |
Perry, “Consumer Electronics, Technology 1997 Analysis & Forecast,” IEEE Spectrum, pp. 43-48, Jan. 1997. |
Perry, “Consumer Electronics, Technology 1998 Analysis & Forecast,” IEEE Spectrum, pp. 57-61, Jan. 1998. |
Raine, “WEB-i User's Guide,” Philips Electronics N.V., 49 pages, Sep. 1996. |
Ramstad, “Silicon Valley Startup Delivers Inexpensive Web Device,”The Associated Press, three pages, Jul. 9, 1996. |
Ratcliffe, “WebTV in Context.; Internet/Web/Online Service Information,” Digital Media, four pages, Nov. 29, 1996. |
Ruffler, et al., “nfoRadio on Demand. Web TV and digiTaz—Telecommerce Case Studies,” 3rd International Workshop on Community Networking, 1996, pp. 71-76, May 23-24, 1996. |
Stoltz, “Web TV: Easy. Cheap. But What's on? You Can Now View the World Wide Web From the Comfort of Your Couch. Is that Good?,” The Washington Post, three pages, Oct. 30, 1996. |
Woolfe, “Woolfe Videotex—the New Television Telephone Information.Services,” John Wiley & Sons, ISBN-13: 978-0471260899, 183 pages, May 6, 1980. |
Wright, et al., “Data/Internet Service Planning in the Shadow of an.Anticipated Cable Modem Standard,” Convergence Systems Incorporated (CSI), 1997 NCTA Technical Papers, pp. 316-322, Copyright 1997. |
Yoshida, “Net Appliances Make Waves,” Electronic Engineering Times, four pages, Dec. 23, 1996. |
Yoshida, “Philips Marries Internet, TV via CD,” Electronic Engineering Times, four pages, Sep. 4, 1995. |
Yoshida, “WebTV pulls Sony, Philips into the Net,” Electronic Engineering Times, Electronic Engineering Times, four pages, Jul. 15, 1996. |
Zylka, et al., “Advanced Data Communications Applications for the CATV Industry,” Zenith Electronics Corporation, 1993 NCTA Technical Papers, pp. 173-178, Copyright 1993. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020092028 A1 | Jul 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08853035 | May 1997 | US |
Child | 10096388 | US |