The present disclosure relates to industrial processes, and in particular to open channel flow measurement of process fluids.
In industrial processes, such as chemical plants or ore processing plants, it is often necessary to measure the mass or volumetric flow rate of various fluids. In most industrial processes flow rates are measured in closed channel flow, and moreover many flow meters, such as Coriolis meters or vortex flow meters, are only practical to operate in closed channel flow.
Open channel flow offers certain advantages because, as compared to closed channel flow, an open channel can require less material and/or process equipment, permit visual inspection of the fluid flow and channel condition, and facilitate cleaning or flushing of the flow channel. These advantages are particularly useful where the process fluid is abrasive or contains a suspended sediment load, as damage to the channel may be easily identified and the channel can be flushed of debris as required. That said, there are certain difficulties when measuring flow rates in open channel flow, such as, for example, a potentially greater entrainment of vapor in the process fluid which, in turn, may lead to difficulty in accurate measurement.
Accordingly, an apparatus and method that can accurately measure process fluid flow rates through flow channels open to atmospheric conditions remain highly desirable.
According to one embodiment, there is provided an apparatus for supporting inferential measurement of open channel flow of a process fluid, the apparatus having: a collection trough adapted to receive the process fluid from a unit process; a measurement channel adapted to receive the process fluid from the collection trough, the measurement channel having a bottom at a substantially consistent angle with ground; one or more baffles connected to the measurement channel, the one or more baffles adapted to adjust the velocity of the process fluid to sub-critical flow; and a level measuring system connected to the measurement channel downstream of the one or more baffles, the level measuring system adapted to send and receive one or more signals through the process fluid in the measurement channel to determine the depth of the process fluid.
According to a further embodiment there is provided a method of measuring open channel flow of a process fluid, the method including the steps of: collecting a flow of the process fluid from a unit process by a collection trough; directing the process fluid to one or more baffles; contacting the process fluid with the one or more baffles to reduce the velocity of the process fluid to sub-critical flow; directing the process fluid to a measurement channel; measuring the depth of the process fluid in the measurement channel by a level measuring system; and inferring the flow rate of the process fluid by a correlation algorithm using the depth of the process fluid in the measurement channel and an angle of the bottom of the measurement channel relative to ground.
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with the use of drawings in which:
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
Embodiments are described below, by way of example only, beginning with reference to
The apparatus 100 generally has a collection trough 102, a measurement channel 104, a set of one or more baffles 106 and a level measuring system 108.
The collection trough 102 receives process fluid from a unit process. A unit process could include any industrial process where process fluid is ejected, for example, a potash or bitumen flotation tank cell where process fluid overflows from an edge of the flotation tank cell. The collection trough 102 is connected to the measurement channel 104 so as to permit process fluid received by the collection trough to be conveyed to the measurement channel. In
The baffles 106 are connected to the measurement channel 104. Process fluid entering the collection trough 102 can flow at critical or super-critical flow, particularly where the process fluid flow is high relative to the size of the collection trough and/or where the angle of the collection trough is steep relative to ground. The baffles 106 contact process fluid entering the measurement channel 104 to reduce the velocity of the process fluid as it enters the measurement channel to sub-critical flow. If the process fluid is already flowing at sub-critical flow the baffles 106 may have a limited effect on the fluid velocity. By reducing process fluid velocity to sub-critical flow, level measurement by the level measuring system 108 is more accurate as a given change in the volumetric flow rate of the process fluid has a more pronounced effect on the level of the process fluid flow in the measurement channel 104 than would be the case in critical or supercritical flow states. In applications where there is non-negligible entrainment of a vapor phase in the process fluid the baffles 106 may further reduce the entrained vapor phase by breaking up at least some of the bubbles or froth in the process fluid flow thereby leading to more accurate flow measurement by the level measuring system 108.
Various geometries of the baffles 106 is contemplated and is discussed below with reference to
The measurement channel 104 receives the process fluid from the collection trough 102. In
The measurement channel 104 incudes a spray deflector plate 112. In many process environments there may be a certain amount of entrained liquid in the air proximal to the apparatus 100. If that entrained liquid contacts the level measuring system 108 and/or the signal used to measure the level of the process fluid in the measurement channel 104, the level measuring system could report an inaccurate measurement. The spray plate shields the level measuring system 108 and thereby reduces the chance of inaccurate measurement. In an alternative embodiment the measurement channel 104 may include a second collection trough that collects entrained process liquids in the air and returns those liquids to the collection trough 102.
The measurement channel 104 has a bottom 104b at a substantially consistent angle with ground. Consistency in the angle of the bottom 104b of the measurement channel 104 contributes to stabilization of process fluid flow and to accurate depth measurement by the level measuring system 108. The bottom 104b may be any shape, such as a U-shape, a V-shape or flat. The measurement channel 104 may be substantially any shape including a Parshall flume. In certain embodiments the measurement channel 104 may accept an insert to vary the shape of the measurement channel interfacing with the process fluid. For example, if reduced fluid flow is experienced from a unit process an insert may by placed inside the measurement channel 104 to decrease the effective cross-sectional area of the measurement channel thereby leading to more accurate measurement of the reduced process fluid flow.
In a preferred embodiment the action of the baffles 106 and the angle and shape of the measurement channel 104 cooperate to ensure that there is sub-critical flow in the measurement channel but that the flow of the process fluid is not so slow so as to effect unacceptable sedimentation of debris in the measurement channel.
In certain embodiments the angle of the measurement channel 104 relative to ground can be adjusted. For example, in
The level measuring system 108 is connected to the measurement channel 104 downstream of the baffles 106. The level measuring system 108 sends and receives signals 108a through the process fluid moving through the measurement channel 104 in order to determine the depth of the process fluid. As will be described below with reference to
The level measuring system 108 shown in
In
Turning now to
Showing additional context for an application of the apparatus described herein,
Turning now to methods associated with the apparatus described herein,
Steps 602 through 610 may be implemented using the exemplary apparatus 100 as described herein or by various alternatives discussed above.
At step 612 the process fluid level in the measurement channel is converted to an inferred volumetric flow by a correlation algorithm.
Various correlation algorithms would be known by the skilled person. The correlation algorithm may be empirically or theoretically determined and depend on the process fluid characteristics and composition. However, in general, the correlation algorithms relevant to the present disclosure infer the flow rate of a process fluid from the depth of fluid flow at a given angle and process fluid conditions or parameters. By way of illustrative example only, if the process fluid were water then at sub-critical flow conditions the Manning formula may be used to provide the fluid flow rate. With SI unit the Manning formula is given as:
where Q is the flow rate (m3/s); v is the mean fluid velocity (m/s); A is the cross-sectional flow area (m2); k=1.00 in SI units; R is the hydraulic radius (i.e. the cross-sectional area divided by wetted perimeter) in m; S is the slope of the channel at the point of measurement in rise/run m/m; and n is the Manning's roughness coefficient. Each of these variables would either be known or can be calculated from the angle and geometry of the measurement channel as described herein and the depth of the fluid flow in that measurement channel. The derived volumetric flow rate can be converted to mass flow rate if the density of the process fluid in the measurement channel can be reliably determined.
The described apparatuses and methods also lend themselves to various method to assess and/or improved the reliability of the inferred flow rate. For example, the angle of the measurement channel could be adjusted from a first angle relative to ground to a second angle relative to ground. Assuming that the measurements and assumed constants are accurate, a skilled person would expect relatively little discrepancy between the two measured process flow rates. If desired, the inferred flow rate could be compared against an established flow rate determined by collecting the process fluid flow through the measurement channel for a given time. If the inferred flow rate differs from the measured flow rate it may be possible to revise the constant flow properties, such as the Manning roughness, to obtain a more accurate inferred flow rate.
By measuring the process fluid flow rates through open channels it becomes possible to optimize the process fluid flow rate from a unit process. Various techniques, such as integrated quadratic control, may be used to strategically allocate the desired flow rate set-points of several flotation cells in series thus, where appropriate, ensuring that the first cells in the series contribute more flow than the last cells in the series to achieve a finite allowed total flow rate.
Many further modifications will readily occur to those skilled in the art to which the invention relates and the specific embodiments herein described should be taken as illustrative of the invention only and not as limiting its scope as defined in accordance with the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3188132 | Jan 2023 | CA | national |