The instant disclosure relates generally to the removal and control of orbital debris. In particular, the instant disclosure relates to apparatus and methods for removing orbital debris from low Earth orbit (“LEO”).
The term “resident space object” (“RSO”) refers to natural and artificial objects that orbit another object, such as operational satellites and other spacecraft. RSOs that no longer serve any function are called “orbital debris” (the term “debris” is used herein as a shorthand to refer to orbital debris). Examples of orbital debris include expired spacecraft, upper stages of launch vehicles, debris released during separation of a spacecraft from its launch vehicle or during mission operations, debris created as a result of spacecraft or upper stage explosions or collisions, solid rocket motor effluents, paint flecks, and thermal blankets.
Orbital debris threatens operational satellites, particularly in LEO, and more particularly between about 600 km and about 1200 km altitude. In fact, most debris objects travel in circular or near-circular orbits at altitudes between about 600 km and about 1,200 km, where they threaten operating scientific, commercial, and military satellites.
The orbital debris threat generally falls into one of three categories, based on the size of the debris. Debris larger than about 10 cm in size can cause catastrophic damage to an operational satellite or other spacecraft. Debris between about 1 mm and about 10 cm in size can cause lesser, but nonetheless significant, damage to an operational satellite or other spacecraft. Still smaller debris (e.g., less than about 1 mm in size) can cause sandpapering effects.
Collision warnings and alerts (e.g., between an active satellite and a piece of large debris) are already numerous, and the frequency and severity of impacts and near-collisions will likely increase over the next several years due to the expected launch of over 10,000 new satellites. Some hypotheses hold that, if the accumulation of orbital debris is not checked, the LEO debris field will increase in density until space flight is effectively impossible to accomplish safely.
Currently, ground-based sensors are the primary source of space situational awareness (“SSA”) and traffic management data used to generate collision warnings and alerts (collectively, “conjunction warnings”). For example, orbital debris detection and tracking is typically accomplished using ground-based sensors. Yet, these ground-based assets (e.g., facilities and personnel) are limited and expensive. Consequently, debris detection and tracking activities have been intermittent and subject to lower levels of accuracy.
Moreover, it is difficult for extant ground-based sensors to detect and track smaller debris (e.g., less than about 10 cm in size). This limits the ability to generate conjunction warnings between active satellites and smaller debris, despite the harm that smaller debris can nonetheless inflict thereupon.
At the other end of the spectrum are large debris objects (e.g., about 10 cm or greater in size), which ground-based sensors can more readily track. Although large debris can do substantial, and even catastrophic, damage to an active satellite, large debris objects are far fewer in number than the smaller debris objects discussed above, with an estimated population of about 25,000 debris objects. Because of the vastness of space, the frequency of collisions between large debris objects and active satellites is extremely low, with the probability of such collisions approaching zero. For instance, there is only one confirmed instance of a collision between an expired satellite (Cosmos 2251) and an active satellite (Iridium 33).
Nonetheless, a substantial number of conjunction warnings are issued to satellite operators daily. These warnings are, however, susceptible to various shortcomings, including trajectory prediction errors, tracking errors, and delays. In fact, the collision between Cosmos 2251 and Iridium 33 was only detected after-the-fact.
It would be desirable to perform at least the foregoing functions (e.g., orbital debris removal, orbital debris tracking, and the like) using one or more LEO satellites in the equatorial, or a near-equatorial, plane. For purposes of this disclosure, the term “near-equatorial plane” means from the equatorial plane up to about 28.5 degrees inclination relative to the equatorial plane.
Indeed, the use of LEO satellites may allow these functions to be performed more thoroughly and precisely than the use of ground-based sensors. For instance, the use of sensors in LEO in the equatorial or a near-equatorial plane can assist in tracking smaller debris objects (e.g., less than about 10 cm in size).
Another advantage is that orbiting sensors are not limited by geography or politics.
Disclosed herein is a method of managing space traffic, including communicating with a satellite constellation including a plurality of satellites, each satellite being in a near-equatorial, low Earth orbit and comprising at least one sensor for tracking resident space objects (“RSO”), wherein communicating with the satellite constellation further includes: receiving, from the satellite constellation, tracking data for a plurality of RSOs; and using the tracking data received from the satellite constellation to adjust orbital trajectory information for the plurality of RSOs.
The method can also include integrating the tracking data received from the satellite constellation with an RSO catalog. In embodiments of the disclosure, the RSO catalog can include RSO tracking data received from a terrestrial sensor.
According to aspects of the disclosure, the method also includes issuing a conjunction warning between an RSO of the plurality of RSOs and a space vehicle based upon the adjusted orbital trajectory information for the plurality of RSOs.
The step of communicating with the satellite constellation can also include adjusting an orbit of at least one satellite responsive to the adjusted orbital trajectory information for the plurality of RSOs. In embodiments, the at least one satellite can include at least one debris interception vehicle, and the step of adjusting an orbit of the at least one satellite responsive to the adjusted orbital trajectory information for the plurality of RSOs can include commanding the at least one debris interception vehicle to maneuver into position to intercept a target RSO of the plurality of RSOs.
It is contemplated that at least some satellites of the plurality of satellites include at least one debris impact pad.
The foregoing and other aspects, features, details, utilities, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from reading the following description and claims, and from reviewing the accompanying drawings.
The instant disclosure provides one or more constellations of satellites in equatorial (or near-equatorial) orbit that incorporate both debris sensing/tracking capabilities and debris removal capabilities. Embodiments of the disclosure are described herein with reference to a satellite constellation that includes multi-function satellites configured to sense, track, and remove debris. That is, according to the exemplary embodiments discussed herein, satellites in the constellation are equipped both with sensor array(s) for RSO detection, tracking enhancement, and increased trajectory modelling precision, and with a debris collection mechanism, such as a debris impact pad.
It should be understood, however, that the teachings herein can also be applied in other contexts. For example, it is contemplated that a first satellite constellation can include exclusively sensing/tracking satellites, while a second satellite constellation can include exclusively debris removal satellites.
Advantageously, this disclosure includes methods, apparatus, and systems that facilitate the avoidance of active operating satellites within the debris zone, while eliminating debris objects. Another advantage of the instant disclosure is that it minimizes the need for significant out-of-plane maneuvers. Still another advantage of the instant disclosure is that it is unlikely to appear to be a space weapon. As a result, the teachings herein include systems and methods that are cost-effective and acceptable to the international space community.
Satellites in a constellation according to aspects of the instant disclosure may be assigned responsibility for specified debris object size ranges, beginning, for example, with debris objects of about 1 mm in size. Debris collection mechanisms can be sized to eliminate debris objects up to about a few meters in size.
Debris elimination operations as disclosed herein occur in or near the Earth's equatorial plane. This leverages that low-orbiting debris and active satellites tend to be less dense at the equator and denser at high latitudes, and that every piece of non-equatorial debris must pass through the plane of the Earth's equator twice per orbit, once from north-to-south and once from south-to-north.
This disclosure facilitates the creation of effective space traffic management operations, safe LEOs for satellites and constellations, and complete SSA information. These objectives are desirable for continued access to near-Earth space applications and can be achieved through the use of in-orbit RSO sensors, software for modelling and optimization of debris collection orbits, data fusion, “tuned” equatorial orbits, and debris impact pads.
Heretofore unknown to those of ordinary skill in the art is the use of spacecraft that use an impact pad for wholesale debris collection while in equatorial orbits. In addition, for the first time, sensors that look directionally (e.g., north and south) are mounted on equatorial spacecraft in order to collect data on RSOs, such as detection and tracking information. This in-orbit RSO data is then combined with terrestrial RSO data in order to generate significantly improved knowledge of the LEO debris field, to predict with greater accuracy close encounters between active satellites and debris, and to expand RSO catalogs for space traffic management operations.
Satellites 103 can be designed to operate in the zones of maximum debris density, e.g., at altitudes between about 600 km and about 1,200 km. The aspects of this disclosure can, of course, be applied to a wider range of altitudes, but debris densities tend to be lower below about 600 km and above about 1,200 km.
In embodiments, satellites 103 are multi-function vehicles configured for both RSO sensing and debris removal.
For instance, telemetry and command equipment 303 allows data and commands to travel via radio frequency (RF) techniques between vehicle 201 and ground station(s). As will be familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art, telemetry and command equipment 303 can include transmitters, receives, antennas, and signal processing equipment.
Bus 202 can also include one or more sensor arrays 304 for detecting and tracking RSOs. Each sensor array 304 can include one or more sensors (e.g., sensors designed to detect RSOs of various and varying size; sensors designed to detect RSOs at various and varying altitudes, up to the geosynchronous altitude and beyond), with the different sensor arrays 304 (and/or the sensors therein) offering different fields of view and orientations.
As discussed in further detail below, data collected by sensor arrays 304 can be sent (e.g., using telemetry and command equipment 303) to terrestrial facilities, where the data can be combined with other data (e.g., data gathered by terrestrial sensors) to produce precision RSO catalogs, accurate debris field density distributions, and precise collision avoidance solutions for satellite operators. Sensor arrays 304 also facilitate improved vehicle operational records and health monitoring.
Insofar as vehicle 201 will spend about half of its time in Earth's shadow, bus 202 can also include one or more batteries 305, 306, which provide power during shadow periods. Solar arrays 203, shown in
Vehicle 201 can also include a propulsion system to enable it to maneuver in orbit. Multiple propellant tanks 307 can be provided in order to maintain balance and sufficient propellant for maneuvers;
Bus 202 can also include refueling ports 308, 309, which allow vehicle 201 to be serviced (e.g., refilling propellant tanks 307) periodically by servicing units (not shown).
Thus,
Referring again to
Insofar as most debris approaching impact pads 204 will be approaching from either the north or south, impact pads 204 can be rotatable 205 about an axis. When impact pads 204 are oriented as shown in
As shown in
In block 401, in-orbit sensors (e.g., sensor arrays 304) scan altitudes where there are RSOs of interest and/or that may pose threats to active spacecraft (labeled “1,” “2,” and “3”). Depending on various factors, such as size and distance, RSOs may be detected, identified, and/or tracked. For example, smaller objects (e.g., less than about 1 mm in size) may only be detected, but not identified or tracked; medium-sized objects (e.g., between about 1 mm and about 10 cm in size) may be detected and identified, but not tracked; and larger objects (e.g., greater than about 10 cm in size) may be detected, identified, and tracked. Sensors 401 can store collected data in on-board data storage 409.
In block 408, a flight computer integrates the data collected by sensors 401 with data about the position and orientation of vehicle 201, which can be provided by in-orbit GN&C sensors 402. This integrated data can then be passed to telemetry and command equipment (e.g., 303) in block 407 for transmission (e.g., via RF) to a terrestrial receiver in block 404.
Terrestrial sensors 406 can also detect, identify, and track RSOs, though with limited capability relative to in-orbit sensor arrays 304. Terrestrial RSO information can exist in the form of an RSO catalog. Data from terrestrial sensors 406 can also be passed to terrestrial receiver 404, where it can be integrated with the data from in-orbit sensor arrays 304 (e.g., to update the RSO catalog with adjusted trajectory information for one or more RSOs).
The integrated RSO data can then be passed to a modeling and orbit optimization center in block 403, which can generate maneuver commands for vehicles 201. Maneuver commands can include, for example, commands that position impact pads 204 of a vehicle 201 in the pathway of an RSO to be intercepted (e.g., an orbital debris object) and commands that move vehicle 201 out of the pathway of an RSO that is not to be intercepted (e.g., an active satellite).
The maneuver commands generated in block 403 can be the result of ongoing simulations of potential mission solutions that allow optimization of propellant usage and satisfaction of debris control objectives. For example, objectives may include the delivery of cost-effective debris protection for a paying client while avoiding assisting non-payers (e.g., delivering debris collection services to customers while avoiding incidentally benefiting non-customers). Ongoing simulation may incorporate Monte Carlo methods to improve statistical verification of planned maneuvers. The resultant commands can be sent to a command uplink in block 405 for transmission to vehicles 201.
Trajectory prediction improvement block 501 computes and outputs conjunction predictions (block 504). Detection and tracking data receiver block 502 generates near real-time spatial and temporal small debris population distributions for LEO (block 505), which can be used, for example, in block 503, and in conjunction with both improved RSO trajectories (block 501) and client requirements (block 506) to optimize debris interception vehicle orbit(s) and to generate corresponding orbit adjustment commands in block 507. Commands are then passed to uplink 405.
As discussed above, a feature of a multi-functional vehicle 201 as disclosed herein is the ability thereof to reduce its exposed collection surface area by rotating 205 impact pads 204 such that they are perpendicular to the equatorial plane (e.g., such that their maximum surface area A is oriented in the nadir and anti-nadir directions). Thus, vehicles 201 can both fly in orbits that allow them to avoid non-targeted RSOs while also further reducing impact pad 204 area profiles as may be necessary or desirable. For instance, the software algorithms disclosed herein can compare the spatial and temporal equatorial crossings of all RSOs in the RSO catalog that are not to be collected. The software can then numerically test all orbits for possible collisions with RSOs that are to be avoided, allowing any needed orbital adjustments to be executed in a timely manner. In some cases where the desired RSO avoidance can be achieved by reducing impact pad area as seen by the RSO to be avoided, impact pads 204 can be rotated out of the equatorial plane as discussed above.
In addition to tuning orbits, the software algorithms disclosed herein can also use the collected sensor data to maintain a near-real-time complete spatial and temporal model of the “small but damaging” debris (e.g., from about 1 mm to about 10 cm in size) population throughout the LEO zone.
In summary, the software algorithms disclosed herein can create and maintain an environment in which large RSOs are avoided and small RSO collection is maximized. Furthermore, the software can further tune satellite constellation orbits to target small-but-dense-debris areas that threaten operating commercial and government satellites and constellations.
Although several embodiments have been described above with a certain degree of particularity, those skilled in the art could make numerous alterations to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of this invention.
For example, sensor arrays 304 can also provide continuous SSA coverage of the geosynchronous Earth orbit (“GEO”) belt, offering low-latency surveillance of all spacecraft-sized objects in GEO. This enhances terrestrial GEO SSA and can resolve the “solar exclusive” problem that occurs during equinox periods.
All directional references (e.g., upper, lower, upward, downward, left, right, leftward, rightward, top, bottom, above, below, vertical, horizontal, clockwise, and counterclockwise) are only used for identification purposes to aid the reader's understanding of the present invention, and do not create limitations, particularly as to the position, orientation, or use of the invention. Joinder references (e.g., attached, coupled, connected, and the like) are to be construed broadly and may include intermediate members between a connection of elements and relative movement between elements. As such, joinder references do not necessarily infer that two elements are directly connected and in fixed relation to each other.
It is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative only and not limiting. Changes in detail or structure may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 62/512,488, filed 30 May 2017 (“the '488 application”). This application is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/448,074, filed 2 Mar. 2017 (“the '074 application”), now U.S. Pat. No. 9,714,101, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/352,185, filed 15 Nov. 2016 (“the '185 application”), now U.S. Pat. No. 9,617,017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/333,268, filed 25 Oct. 2016 (“the '268 application”), now abandoned. The '488, '074, '185, and '268 applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties as though fully set forth herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62512488 | May 2017 | US |