Apparatus and methods for strengthening guardrail installations

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6575434
  • Patent Number
    6,575,434
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 17, 1999
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 10, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
Devices and methods for strengthening the upper portions of the support posts for guardrails and guardrail end treatments against the forces that are imparted to the post during an impact. The upper portions of support posts, particularly the areas proximate the bolt connection, are reinforced. Preferably, a compressive force is applied to those areas as well by the reinforcements. In one embodiment, reinforcement for the upper portion of the post is provided by metal banding that is disposed around the periphery of the post. Alternative exemplary embodiments are also described in which reinforcement to the upper portion of the post is provided by plates that are secured into place on a location proximate the connection bolt and by a metal cap that sits atop the post. In another embodiment, the drilled hole and connection bolt are eliminated.
Description




BACKGROUND




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention is directed to devices and methods for improving the integrity and performance capabilities of guardrail installations. In particular, the invention is directed to devices and methods for strengthening the support posts and entire installation to accommodate redirection impacts along the length of a guardrail.




2. Description of the Related Art




Guardrail installations are longitudinal safety devices that extend along the sides of highways and roadways. In their usual construction, a corrugated rail member is supported above the ground by a number of support posts that are often fashioned of wood. The rail member is interconnected to each post by a connection bolt that passes through a drilled hole in the post.




Guardrail installations usually experience two types of vehicle impacts, and should be designed to function well in response to each. The first type of impact is an end-on impact in which one end of the guardrail installation is impacted by a vehicle that approaches the guardrail from a substantially end-on direction. In this type of impact, the guardrail installation should perform in a controlled manner in order to absorb the energy of the colliding vehicle. To accommodate this performance, frangible (or break-away) posts, which are structurally weakened at or near the ground level to assist in breaking the post away, are sometimes used at the upstream end of a guardrail installation. A number of guardrail end treatments have been devised to assist the controlled performance of the rail member during an end-on impact. These include the guardrail extruder terminal, which is known commercially as the ET-2000, and the slotted rail terminal.




The second type of impact that a guardrail should be designed for is a redirection impact wherein a colliding vehicle approaches and engages the guardrail substantially from the lateral side. In this type of impact, the role of the guardrail installation is to redirect the vehicle back into its lane of traffic and provide a resilient, but non-yielding barrier that will prevent the colliding vehicle from penetrating the rail member and passing through to the opposite side of the guardrail installation. This aspect of guardrail design is important because a colliding vehicle that passes through a guardrail might travel into an area of extreme danger, such as a lane of traffic moving in the opposite direction or toward a precipice. This barrier role is the principal function of a guardrail installation.




The inventors have determined that the point at which the connection bolt passes through the guardrail post is a location of true vulnerability for the support posts during a redirection impact. The presence of the drilled hole for the guardrail attachment bolt has weakened the post to a degree. In addition, forces applied to the bolt from the rail member, as might occur in a redirection impact collision, impart strong forces to the drilled hole which can easily split the post in half. When this occurs, the posts may split and, thus, the rail member may be released from the posts, and the ability of the guardrail to prevent a colliding vehicle from passing through it is compromised or destroyed. The inventors have learned through crash testing that such failures often cause the guardrail to lose integrity and allow vehicles to penetrate the guardrail.




In the past, attempts to strengthen guardrail installations against penetration from redirection impacts have focused on increasing the number of support posts that anchor the rail member to the ground or by using larger, thicker support posts, or both. Unfortunately, these options significantly increase the expense of the guardrail installation. More importantly, however, they inhibit the ability of the guardrail to perform its other intended purpose providing a controlled activation or collapse during end-on impacts. Larger and stronger posts, or an increased number of posts, stiffen the guardrail system and degrade its ability to perform in an acceptable manner during an end-on impact. In addition, an impact by a vehicle with a thicker, stronger post may stop the vehicle abruptly and severely damage it, resulting in greater injuries to the occupants.




It would be an improvement to have a device and method that addresses the problems of the prior art.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides devices and methods for strengthening the upper portions of the support post assemblies of guardrails and guardrail end treatments against the forces that are imparted to the post during an impact. The upper portions of support posts, particularly the areas proximate the bolt connection, are reinforced. Preferably, a compressive force is applied to those areas as well by the reinforcements.




In one preferred embodiment, reinforcement for the upper portion of the post is provided by metal banding that is disposed around the periphery of the post. Alternative exemplary embodiments are also described in which reinforcement to the upper portion of the post is provided by plates that are secured into place at a location proximate the connection bolt or by a metal cap that sits atop the post. In a further alternative embodiment, a strengthened support post assembly is provided by eliminating from the post the drilled hole and connection bolt disposed therewithin. The rail member is instead affixed to a collar that surrounds the post.




The methods and devices of the present invention optimize the strength of the support post assemblies for guardrail installations. They also allow guardrail installations to be inexpensively strengthened to provide increased redirection capability in response to redirection impacts. At the same time, the guardrail installation's ability to collapse in a controlled manner in response to end-on impacts is not reduced.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates an exemplary guardrail installation having several support posts that have been reinforced against splitting or other upper portion failures.





FIGS. 2-8

depict alternative means for reinforcing the upper portion of an exemplary guardrail post.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

depicts an exemplary guardrail installation


10


having a longitudinal, corrugated rail member


12


that is supported above the ground


14


by a plurality of support post assemblies


16


,


18


. Although only the upstream end of the guardrail installation


10


is depicted, it should be understood that portions of the guardrail assembly


10


may extend for a desired distance in a downstream direction and may be of any length. These portions will be, likewise supported by additional support post assemblies that are not shown. The term upstream is intended herein to mean that end or portion of the guardrail installation which faces the direction from which traffic is expected to approach. It is noted that the invention also has application to the opposite, downstream, end and other portions of a guardrail installation as well.




Each of the post assemblies


16


,


18


includes a wooden post


20


. The posts


20


have a lower portion, shown generally at


21


, that is disposed within the ground


14


and an upper portion, shown generally at


23


, that is affixed to the rail member


12


. The lower portion


21


is typically disposed within the ground


14


by burying, but may also be disposed within the ground


14


by inserting the lower portion


21


into a foundation tube (not shown) of a type known in the art.




The upper portion


23


of the post


20


is considered herein to be that portion of the post that lies proximate the bolt


22


and the top of the post


20


. The upper portion


23


encompasses approximately the upper ⅓ to ½ of the portion of the post


20


that is exposed above ground. The support posts


20


may be round or rectangular in cross-sectional shape. The posts


20


are typically formed of wood.




A bolt hole (not visible in

FIG. 1

) has been drilled through each of the posts


20


and a bolt


22


is disposed through each hole as well as the rail member


12


. The bolt


22


has a flattened head (also not visible in

FIG. 1

) on one end and is threaded at the other end to receive a nut and washer


24


.




The upstream portion of a guardrail installation typically has an end treatment that helps prevent spearing or vaulting of vehicles that impact the guardrail from substantially end-on. There are a number of such end treatments known and in use. In

FIG. 1

, a curved rail end treatment


26


is depicted wherein the corrugations of the rail member


12


are flattened out and the end then curved around to help distribute the crash forces over a larger area on the impacting vehicle. Other end treatments include, for example, the guardrail extruder terminal which is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,928 and the slotted rail terminal which is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,407,298. Each of these patents is incorporated herein by reference.




It is pointed out that the two guardrail post assemblies


16


,


18


, being located the furthest upstream in the installation


10


, may be break-away guardrail post assemblies. As a result, they will, or are intended to, fracture near the level of the ground


14


. Post cable


28


, of a type known in the art, is anchored at one end to the lower portion


21


of the first post assembly


16


and extends upward to a cable anchor


30


that secures the cable


28


to the rail member


12


. The post cable


28


helps anchor and provide tensile strength to the rail member


12


to enable the installation


10


to redirect vehicles impacting along the length of the rail member


12


.




In order to strengthen the upper portion


23


of the posts


20


, a reinforcement is operably associated with the posts


20


. In the installation shown in

FIG. 1

, a strip


32


of metal banding surrounds an area of the upper portion


23


of each post


20


proximate the bolt


22


. The strip


32


is shown located slightly below the bolt


22


arising from tensile forces transmitted through rail member


12


. However, it may also be located above the bolt


22


, as shown in FIG.


8


. If desired, one or more such strips may be placed on either side of the bolt


22


. The strip


32


is preferably applied to the posts


20


by use of a banding machine of a type known in the art. In addition, the banding is preferably tightened so as to apply a compression load to the posts


20


by tightening the strip


32


so that inwardly-directed forces are applied to the portions of the post


20


that are proximate the bolt


22


. These compression forces act as countervailing forces to those post-splitting forces that would act upon the post


20


due to lateral movement of the bolt


22


within its bolt hole. Tightening of the strip


32


also ensures that the strip


32


does not move upwardly or downwardly upon the post


20


. A currently preferred size for the banding making up the strip


32


is 19 mm (approximately ¾″) in width and 0.38 mm in thickness. Although only the two leading support post assemblies


16


,


18


are shown in

FIG. 1

to be reinforced in the manner, it should be understood that any or all of the support posts for the guardrail installation


10


may be reinforced as well.




Reinforcement of the support posts


20


in this manner has been shown to be effective during testing in preventing failures of the guardrail during redirection impacts. During a side impact to the rail member


12


, the rail member


12


is deformed and lateral forces are applied to the connection bolt


22


as a result, thereby moving the bolt


22


angularly with respect to its drilled hole. The presence of the reinforcement provided by the banding strip


32


helps prevent the movement of the bolt


22


from splitting the post in two. Further, the compressive load applied to the upper portion


23


by the strip


32


acts as a countervailing force to those applied to the post


20


by the bolt


22


.




Referring now to

FIGS. 2-6

, a number of exemplary alternative embodiments are depicted for reinforcing the upper portion


23


of a support post assembly


16


. For clarity, like components among the various embodiments are numbered alike. In each of these drawings, the rail member


12


is not shown, although it should be understood that the connection bolt


22


will affix the rail member


12


to the post


20


in the same manner as depicted in FIG.


1


.




In

FIG. 2

, a pair of compression plates


40


are affixed to each other by rigid tie rods


42


. Threaded nuts


44


hold the plates


40


onto the tie rods


42


and can be tightened to apply the compression load to the post


20


.




In

FIG. 3

, a rigid, rectangular collar


46


is disposed around the upper portion


23


of the post


20


. The connection bolt


22


passes through holes (not shown) in the collar


46


thereby securing the collar to the post


20


. This type of arrangement, while strengthening the upper portion


23


and helping to resist post-splitting forces, does not apply a significant compressive force to the post


20


.





FIG. 4

illustrates an alternative construction wherein a pair of generally U-shaped brackets


48


,


50


are disposed on the upper portion


23


of the post


20


. The brackets


48


,


50


are held in place on the post


20


by the bolt


22


. The brackets


48


,


50


each have a central plate


52


and two side pieces


54


(only one visible on each). The nut/washer


24


may be tightened to apply compression loading to the upper portion


23


of the post


20


.





FIG. 5

depicts an embodiment wherein reinforcement is provided to the upper portion


23


by a rigid cap


56


that has a top plate


58


and four side plates


60


(two shown). The cap


56


fits over the top of the post


20


, and the sides


60


of the cap


56


help resist post splitting forces.

FIG. 5

also illustrates, in phantom, the drilled hole


62


through which the connection bolt


22


is disposed. The cap


56


may be secured to the post


20


using an adhesive or connectors (not shown). Alternatively, the cap


56


may be secured using an interference fit.





FIG. 6

shows an alternative embodiment of the invention wherein a pair of flat plates


64


are retained against opposite sides of the upper portion


23


of the post


20


by the connection bolt


22


and nut/washer


24


.





FIG. 7

illustrates a further alternative embodiment for strengthening a guardrail post and guardrail installation. The post assembly


16


is shown in plan cross-section for clarity. The post


20


is provided with an external rigid collar


66


that is formed of two half sections


68


,


70


. Each of the half sections


68


,


70


has a pair of flanges


72


with apertures disposed therethrough. Nut-and-bolt type connectors


74


are disposed through the apertures of the flanges


72


to secure the half sections together. The connectors


74


are tightened to ensure that the collar


66


is tightly secured against the post


20


. A threaded shaft


76


protrudes from the collar


66


. The rail member


12


is affixed to the post assembly


16


by disposing the threaded shaft


76


through a complimentary sized aperture


78


in the rail member


12


. A nut


80


is then secured upon the shaft


76


.




It is noted that the post


20


lacks a drilled hole, such as the drilled hole


62


shown earlier, and no connection bolt is disposed through the post


20


. As a result, there is no point of weakness in the post


20


created by these structures. It is pointed out that the rail member


12


could be affixed to the collar


66


in a number of other ways as well, such as by disposing a flathead bolt outwardly through an aperture in the collar


66


and then through the rail member


12


. It should be understood that the collar


66


is a connection member that is affixed to the upper portion


23


of the post


20


. Forces imparted by the rail member


12


to the shaft


76


during a collision will be transmitted to the collar


66


and act upon the outer portions of the post


20


rather than tending to split it apart.




Reinforcement of guardrail installations using the methods and devices described above is relatively inexpensive as compared with the alternatives of installing additional posts or using larger, stronger posts and avoids any degradation in performance in substantially end-on collisions with the guardrail installation that may arise from implementing of those other methods. In addition, retrofitting of existing guardrail installations can be accomplished relatively easily.




While the invention has been shown or described in only some of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited, but is susceptible to various changes within departing from the scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A guardrail installation comprising:a longitudinally corrugated rail member; a plurality of support posts that are affixed to the rail member to support the rail member; the support posts each having a lower portion that is buried and an upper portion that is affixed to the rail member; a hole drilled through the upper portion of at least one of said support posts; a connection bolt disposed through the hole and through the rail member; a reinforcing member having a laterally-located compression load applying portion for applying inwardly-directed forces to provide reinforcement to the upper portion of that support post from countervailing post-splitting forces resulting from lateral movement of the connection bolt, the reinforcing member comprising a strip of metal banding completely surrounding said at least one of the support posts; and the rail member being affixed by the connection bolt to result in contact between the rail member and said at least one of said support posts.
  • 2. The guardrail assembly of claim 1 wherein the reinforcing member is located above the connection bolt.
  • 3. The guardrail assembly of claim 1 wherein the reinforcing member is located below the connection bolt.
  • 4. The guardrail assembly of claim 1 wherein there are a plurality of reinforcing members surrounding a single support post.
  • 5. A guardrail installation comprising:a longitudinally corrugated rail member; a plurality of support posts that are affixed to the rail member to support the rail member; a hole drilled through an upper portion of each of said support posts; a connection bolt disposed through the hole of each of said support posts and through the rail member; a strip of metal banding completely surrounding each of said support posts to provide reinforcement to the upper portion of each support post from countervailing post-splitting forces resulting from lateral movement of the connection bolt; and the connection bolt affixing the rail member to each of said support posts to cause contact between the rail member and each of said support posts.
  • 6. The guardrail installation of claim 5 wherein the strip of metal banding is located proximate the connection bolt.
  • 7. The guardrail installation of claim 6 wherein the strip of metal is located below the connection bolt.
  • 8. The guardrail installation of claim 6 wherein the strip of metal is located above the connection bolt.
  • 9. The guardrail installation of claim 5 wherein a post cable is anchored by being disposed through at least one of said support posts.
  • 10. The guardrail installation of claim 5 wherein the longitudinally corrugated rail member presents a W-shaped cross-section.
  • 11. The guardrail installation of claim 5 wherein the support posts are comprised of wood.
  • 12. A guardrail installation comprising:a longitudinally corrugated rail member having a W-shaped cross-section; a plurality of support posts that are affixed to the rail member to support the rail member; a hole drilled through an upper portion of each of said support posts; a connection bolt disposed through the hole of each of said support posts and through the rail member; a strip of metal banding completely surrounding each of said support posts to provide reinforcement to the upper portion of each support post from countervailing post-splitting forces resulting from lateral movement of the connection bolt; the connection bolt affixing the rail member to each of said support posts to cause contact between the rail member and each of said support posts; and a post cable disposed through the rail member and at least one of said support posts.
  • 13. The guardrail installation of claim 12 wherein the support posts are comprised of wood.
  • 14. A guardrail installation comprising:a longitudinally corrugated rail member; a plurality of support posts that are affixed to the rail member to support the rail member; a hole drilled through an upper portion of each of said support posts; a connection bolt disposed through each of said support posts and through the rail member; a strip of metal banding completely surrounding each of said support posts to provide reinforcement to the upper portion of each support post from countervailing post-splitting forces resulting from lateral movement of the connection bolt, the strip of metal banding being of a type that is applied using a banding machine; and the connection bolt affixing the rail member to each of said support posts to cause contact between the rail member and each of said support posts.
  • 15. A guardrail installation comprising:a longitudinally corrugated rail member having a W-shaped cross-section; a plurality of support posts that are affixed to the rail member to support the rail member; a hole drilled through an upper portion of each of said support posts; a connection bolt disposed through the hole of each of said support posts and through the rail member; a strip of metal banding completely surrounding each of said support posts to provide reinforcement to the upper portion of each support post from countervailing post-splitting forces resulting from lateral movement of the connection bolt, the strip of metal banding being of a type that is applied using a banding machine and having a width of approximately 19 mm and a thickness of approximately 0.38 mm; the connection bolt affixing the rail member to each of said support posts to cause contact between the rail member and each of said support posts; and a post cable disposed through the rail member and at least one of said support posts.
US Referenced Citations (21)
Number Name Date Kind
1625716 Edwards Apr 1927 A
1793675 Camp Feb 1931 A
1977286 Miller Oct 1934 A
2043525 Benedict Jun 1936 A
2160519 Robertson May 1939 A
4161090 Watts, Jr. Jul 1979 A
4324388 Klaser Apr 1982 A
4678166 Bronstad et al. Jul 1987 A
4739971 Ruane Apr 1988 A
4928928 Buth et al. May 1990 A
5152507 Lee Oct 1992 A
5402987 Duyck et al. Apr 1995 A
5407298 Sicking et al. Apr 1995 A
5421556 Dodge et al. Jun 1995 A
5487618 Cox Jan 1996 A
5765811 Alberson et al. Jun 1998 A
5791812 Ivey Aug 1998 A
6022003 Sicking et al. Feb 2000 A
6036399 Schalk Mar 2000 A
6173943 Welch et al. Jan 2001 B1
6220575 Lindsay et al. Apr 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
1256000 Dec 1967 DE