Apparatus and methods for treating root canals of teeth

Description

BACKGROUND

Field of the Disclosure

The present disclosure generally relates to methods and apparatus for removing organic matter from a body location and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for removing organic matter from a root canal system of a tooth.

Description of the Related Art

In conventional root canal procedures, an opening is drilled through the crown of a diseased tooth, and endodontic files are inserted into the root canal system to open the canal and remove organic material therein. The root canal is then filled with solid matter such as gutta percha, and the tooth is restored. However, this procedure will not remove all organic material from all canal spaces. The action of the file during the process of opening the canal creates a smear layer of dentinal filings and diseased organic material on the dentinal walls, which is extremely difficult to remove. The organic material and necrotic tissue that remain in the canal spaces after completion of the procedure often result in post-procedure complications such as infections.

SUMMARY

In an embodiment, an apparatus for removing organic material from a root canal of a tooth is provided. The apparatus may comprise a liquid jet assembly having a liquid pressurization portion which pressurizes a liquid and a liquid beam forming portion in fluid communication with the pressurization portion. The beam forming portion may comprise an orifice that receives the pressurized liquid. The orifice may be sized and shaped to convert the pressurized liquid into a high velocity collimated beam that produces an acoustic wave upon impact with a surface of the tooth. The energy of the wave may cause organic material within the canal to be detached from the surrounding dentinal surface along a length of the canal. The length of the canal may extend at least to an apical portion of the tooth.

In another embodiment, a method of removing organic material that fills a root canal of a tooth is provided. The method comprises propagating an acoustic wave through the tooth. The method may also comprise detaching organic material filling the canal from the surrounding dentinal tissue using energy of the acoustic wave.

In another embodiment, a method of removing organic material from dentinal tubules which extend laterally from a root canal is provided. The method comprises introducing energy into a plurality of tubules through dentinal tissue such that at least a portion of an odontoblastic process within the tubules is detached from surrounding dentinal tissue and released from the tubule.

In another embodiment, a method for removing organic material from a root canal of a tooth is provided. The method comprises impacting dentin with an energy beam of a sufficiently high level to cause cavitations in fluid within the root canal. The cavitations maybe caused at least at locations in the root canal remote relative to the location of energy impact such that organic material within the canal may be detached from surrounding dentinal tissue.

In another embodiment, a method of removing organic material from a root canal comprises directing a liquid jet into the pulp chamber of a tooth through an opening in a side of the tooth at a substantial angle to the long axis of a root canal.

In another embodiment, a method of removing organic material from a root canal using a high velocity liquid jet is provided. The method comprises providing a handpiece for directing the liquid jet and positioning a contact member of the handpiece against a tooth to be treated. The method may also comprise using a sensor to sense contact of the contact member with the tooth. The method also may comprise activating the liquid jet only after the contact is sensed by the sensor.

In another embodiment, a method of removing organic material from a tooth is provided. The method comprises using acoustic energy to detach organic material from surrounding dentin within a plurality of root canals of a single tooth substantially simultaneously.

In another embodiment, an apparatus for removing organic material from a root canal of a tooth is provided. The apparatus comprises an acoustic energy generator arranged to couple acoustic energy to a dentinal surface of the tooth. The acoustic energy may be sufficient to cause organic material in the tooth to be detached from surrounding dentin at locations remote from the acoustic coupling surface.

In another embodiment, a method of removing organic material from a pulp cavity of a tooth is provided. The method comprises providing a liquid jet beam by passing liquid through an orifice. The method may also comprise using a positioning member to position the orifice relative to an opening into a pulp cavity of the tooth such that the jet beam passes through the opening.

For purposes of this summary, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features of the invention are described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such advantages may be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a cross-section view schematically illustrating a root canal system of a tooth.

FIG. 2 is a scanning electron microscope photograph of a dentinal surface within a canal system in a tooth and shows numerous dentinal tubules on the dentinal surface.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram schematically illustrating an embodiment of a compressor system adapted to produce a high-velocity liquid jet.

FIGS. 4 and 4A are cross-section views schematically illustrating an embodiment of a handpiece that can be used to maneuver the high-velocity liquid jet.

FIG. 5A is cross-section view schematically illustrating a distal end of an embodiment of a handpiece configured to deliver a high-velocity liquid jet.

FIG. 5B is a graph showing an example velocity profile of a coherent collimated jet.

FIG. 6A is a cross-section view schematically showing an endodontic method in which a high-velocity jet is directed toward dentin through an opening in the top of a tooth.

FIG. 6B is a cross-section view schematically showing another endodontic method in which the high-velocity jet is directed toward the dentin through an inlet opening in a side of the tooth and a relief opening in the top of the tooth is provided to reduce pressure buildup, if present, and to permit debridement.

FIG. 6C is a cross-section view schematically illustrating an embodiment of a positioning member prior to adherence to a tooth.

FIG. 6D is a cross-section view schematically illustrating an embodiment of a positioning member adhered to a side of a tooth and used to assist coupling the distal end of the handpiece to the side of the tooth so that the high-velocity jet may be directed through the inlet opening.

FIG. 7 schematically illustrates production of an acoustic wave caused by impingement of a high-velocity liquid jet onto a dentinal surface.

FIG. 8A is a cross-section view schematically illustrating cavitation bubbles formed near odontoblasts at the dentinal surface.

FIG. 8B schematically illustrates collapse of a cavitation bubble and formation of a cavitation jet near a dentinal surface.

FIGS. 9A-9C are scanning electron microscope photographs of dentinal surfaces following treatment of the tooth with the high-velocity jet; FIG. 9A shows dentinal tubules in an apical area of a mature tooth magnified 1000×; FIGS. 9B and 9C show dentin and dentinal tubules magnified 1000× in an inclusion area of a juvenile tooth (FIG. 9B) and in a medial area of a mature root (FIG. 9C). A bar at the top left of each photo indicates the linear scale (in microns) for each photograph.

FIGS. 10A-10H schematically illustrate embodiments of a cap that may be attached to a distal end of a handpiece and fitted onto a tooth. FIGS. 10A and 10C-10H are side views, and FIG. 10B is a partially exploded cross-section view.

FIG. 11 schematically illustrates a method for generating an acoustic wave using a piezoelectric transducer.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present disclosure provides various apparatus and methods for dental treatments that overcome possible disadvantages associated with conventional root canal treatments. In certain embodiments, endodontic treatment methods (e.g., root canal therapy) comprise directing a high-velocity liquid jet toward a tooth. Impact of the jet causes acoustic energy to propagate from a site of impact through the entire tooth, including the root canal system of the tooth. The acoustic energy is effective at detaching substantially all organic material in the root canal system from surrounding dentinal walls. In many embodiments, the detached organic material can be flushed from the root canal using low-velocity irrigation fluid. As used herein organic material (or organic matter) includes organic substances typically found in healthy or diseased root canal systems such as, for example, soft tissue, pulp, blood vessels, nerves, connective tissue, cellular matter, pus, and microorganisms, whether living, inflamed, infected, diseased, necrotic, or decomposed.

FIG. 1 is a cross section schematically illustrating a typical human tooth 10, which comprises a crown 12 extending above the gum tissue 14 and at least one root 16 set into a socket (alveolus) within the jaw bone 18. Although the tooth 10 schematically depicted in FIG. 1 is a molar, the apparatus and methods described herein may be used on any type of tooth such as an incisor, a canine, a bicuspid, or a molar. The hard tissue of the tooth 10 includes dentin 20 which provides the primary structure of the tooth 10, a very hard enamel layer 22 which covers the crown 12 to a cementoenamel junction 15 near the gum 14, and cementum 24 which covers the dentin 20 of the tooth 10 below the cementoenamel junction 15.

A pulp cavity 26 is defined within the dentin 20. The pulp cavity 26 comprises a pulp chamber 28 in the crown 11 and a root canal space 30 extending toward an apex 32 of each root 16. The pulp cavity 26 contains dental pulp, which is a soft, vascular tissue comprising nerves, blood vessels, connective tissue, odontoblasts, and other tissue and cellular components. The pulp provides innervation and sustenance to the tooth through the epithelial lining of the pulp chamber 26 and the root canal space 30. Blood vessels and nerves enter/exit the root canal space 30 through a tiny opening, the apical foramen 32, near a tip of the apex 32 of the root 16.

FIG. 2 depicts a pulpal surface of the dentin 20. The dentin 20 comprises numerous, closely-packed, microscopic channels called dentinal tubules 34 that radiate outwards from the interior walls of the canal space 30 through the dentin 20 toward the exterior cementum 24 or enamel 22. The tubules 34 run substantially parallel to each other and have diameters in a range from about 1.0 to 3.0 microns. The density of the tubules 34 is about 5,000-10,000 per mm²near the apex 32 and increases to about 15,000 per mm²near the crown.

The dentin 20 is continuously formed by specialized cells called odontoblasts that secrete a mineralized substance that hardens into dentin. Odontoblasts form a single layer of cells between the dentin 20 and the pulp. An odontoblast has a cell body that is located on the pulpal surface of the dentin 20 on a tubule 34 and a cytoplasmic portion, called the odontoblastic process, that extends into and substantially fills the associated tubule 34. The odontoblasts are connected to each other with interodontoblastic collagen, and collagen fibrils may attach the odontoblast layer to the pulp. As a person ages, the odontoblasts continue to form dentin, which causes the root canal space 30 to decrease in diameter.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a compressor system 38 adapted to generate a high-velocity jet of fluid for use in dental procedures. The compressor system 38 comprises a source of compressed gas 40 such as a pressurized air or gas source commonly available in dental service installations. The compressed gas 40 may be pressurized in a range from about 50 pounds per square inch (psi) to 150 psi including, for example, 100 psi. The compressed gas 40 may comprise any suitable commercially available gas including, for example, air, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or a combination thereof. The compressed gas 40 is pneumatically connected to a pump 46 via a regulator 42. The regulator 42 can be used to regulate the pressure of the input gas to a desired pressure such as, for example, 40 psi. In some embodiments, the pump 46 comprises an air-driven hydraulic pressure intensifier that uses the compressed gas 40 to increase the pressure of liquid received from a fluid source 44. For example, a pressure intensifier having a 330:1 pressure intensification ratio can increase the pressure of the liquid to about 13,200 psi using pressurized gas at 40 psi from the regulator 42. Different pressure intensification ratios may be used in different embodiments. By adjusting the gas pressure with the regulator 42, the pressure of the liquid output from the pump 46 can be selectably adjusted to a desired value or range of values. In some embodiments, the pressure of the liquid can be adjusted within a range from about 500 psi to about 50,000 psi. In certain embodiment, it has been found that a pressure range from about 2,000 psi to about 11,000 psi produces jets that are particularly effective for endodontic treatments.

The fluid source 44 may comprise a fluid container (e.g., an intravenous bag) holding sterile water, a medical-grade saline solution, an antiseptic or antibiotic solution, a solution with chemicals or medications, or any combination thereof. More than one fluid source may be used. In certain embodiments, it is advantageous for jet formation if the liquid provided by the fluid source 44 is substantially free of dissolved gases (e.g., less than 0.1% by volume) and particulates, which can act as nucleation sites for bubbles. In some embodiments, the fluid source 44 comprises degassed distilled water. A bubble detector (not shown) may be disposed between the fluid source 44 and the pump 46 to detect bubbles in the liquid and/or to determine whether liquid flow from the fluid source 44 has been interrupted or the container has emptied. The liquid in the fluid source 44 may be at room temperature or may be heated and/or cooled to a different temperature. For example, in some embodiments, the liquid in the fluid source 44 is chilled to reduce the temperature of the high velocity jet generated by the compressor system 38.

In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 3, the high-pressure liquid from the pump 46 is fed to a regulator 48 and then to a handpiece 50, for example, by a length of high-pressure tubing 49. The regulator 48 may be operable with compressed gas from the source 40 and may be used to regulate the pressure of the liquid to a desired value. For example, in one embodiment, the regulator 48 reduces the 13,200 psi pressure from the pump 46 to about 12,000 psi. The regulator 48 may include water pressure sensors and bleed-off valves (e.g., an air-driven needle valve) to provide the desired pressure and to permit an operator to actuate/deactuate water jet output from the handpiece 50.

The handpiece 50 receives the high pressure liquid and is adapted at a distal end to generate a high-velocity, coherent, collimated beam or jet 60 of liquid for use in dental procedures. The handpiece 50 may be sized and shaped to be maneuverable so that the jet 60 may be directed toward or away from various portions of the tooth 10.

The compressor system 38 may include a controller 51 that controls the operation of the components of the system 38. The controller 51 may comprise a microprocessor, a special or general purpose computer, a floating point gate array, and/or a programmable logic device. In one embodiment, the controller 51 is used to operate the regulators 42, 48 and the pump 46 so that the high-pressure liquid delivered to the handpiece 50 is at a suitable working pressure. The controller 51 may also be used to control safety of the system 38, for example, by limiting system pressures to be below safety thresholds and/or by limiting the time that the jet 60 is permitted to flow from the handpiece 50. In certain embodiments, the controller 51 may be used to vary or cycle the pressure of the liquid delivered to the handpiece 50, for example, by cycling pressures provided by one or both of the regulators 42, 48. In certain such embodiments, sinusoidal or sawtooth pressure variability may be used to provide corresponding variability in the speed of the jet 60. In certain embodiments, cycle time for the pressure variability may be in a range from about 0.1 seconds to about 5 seconds. Additionally and optionally, the controller 51 may regulate a pulse intensifier device (not shown), such as a piezoelectric transducer, that causes pulsations in the jet 60. For example, in certain embodiments, the jet 60 comprises a pulsed jet, which may include a series of discrete liquid pulses, a continuous stream of fluid having spatially varying pressure, velocity, and/or area, or a combination thereof. The controller 51 advantageously may control the amplitude and frequency of the pulsations in the jet 60. In certain embodiments, the amplitude of the pressure variation may be in a range from several hundred to several thousand psi. The pulse frequency may be in a range from about 0.1 Hz to about 10 MHz. For example, in some embodiments, a pulse frequency of about 1 MHz is applied to produce a jet comprising a series of droplets.

The system 38 may also include a user interface 53 that outputs relevant system data and accepts user input. In some embodiments, the user interface 53 comprises a touch screen graphics display. In some embodiments, the user interface 53 may display information including the working liquid pressure in the handpiece 50 and instructions and/or procedures for operating on different tooth types (e.g., incisors, bicuspids, or molars). The user interface 53 may accept user input such as a time setting that sets a maximum time during which the compressor system 38 will deliver the jet 60 and other useful endodontic treatment options. For example, some embodiments permit an operator to select a “ramp up” and/or “ramp down” option in which the working liquid pressure can be gradually increased or decreased, respectively. The ramp up option advantageously may be used for initial aiming of the jet 60 towards a suitable portion of the tooth 10, while the ramp down advantageously may be used if the jet 60 is moved toward a sensitive portion of the tooth 10 (e.g., the apex 32). The compressor system 38 may also include a storage medium (e.g., volatile or nonvolatile memory) configured to store system operating information and executable instructions, user preferences, preferred operating pressures and times, patient data, etc. In some embodiments, the storage medium comprises on-board memory of the controller 51 and/or additional random access or read-only memory, flash memory, removable memory cards, etc.

The compressor system 38 may include additional and/or different components and may be configured differently than shown in FIG. 3. For example, the system 38 may include an aspiration pump that is coupled to the handpiece 50 (or an aspiration cannula) to permit aspiration of organic matter from the mouth or tooth 10. In other embodiments, the compressor system 38 may comprise other pneumatic and/or hydraulic systems adapted to generate the high-velocity beam or jet 60. For example, certain embodiments may utilize apparatus and systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,224,378, issued May 1, 2001, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DENTAL TREATMENT USING HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID JET,” and/or U.S. Pat. No. 6,497,572, issued Dec. 24, 2002, entitled “APPARATUS FOR DENTAL TREATMENT USING HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID JET,” the entire disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

Moreover, in other embodiments, the high-velocity jet 60 may be generated by systems other than the high-pressure compressor system 38, such as, for example, by a pump system. In one such embodiment, an electric motor drives a pump that is in fluid communication with a liquid reservoir. The pump increases the velocity of the liquid so as to provide a narrow beam of high-velocity liquid from the handpiece 50. In some embodiments, multiple pumps are used. As is well known from Bernoulli's law, the total pressure in a flowing fluid includes static (e.g., thermodynamic) pressure plus dynamic pressure (associated with fluid kinetic energy). A skilled artisan will recognize that static pressures in motor-driven pump systems may be less than static pressures in compressor systems, because the motor-driven pump primarily increases the dynamic pressure (e.g., the fluid velocity) of the liquid. The total pressures (static plus dynamic) achieved are comparable in many embodiments of compressor systems and pump systems.

FIGS. 4 and 4A are cross-section views that schematically illustrate one embodiment of the handpiece 50 adapted for forming the high-velocity jet 60. The handpiece 60 comprises an elongated tubular barrel 52 having a central passageway 54 extending axially therethrough. The handpiece 50 has a proximal end 56 that is adapted to engage tubing from the regulator 48 in order for the passageway 54 to be in fluid communication with the high pressure liquid delivered by the compressor system 38. The barrel 52 may include features 55 that enhance grasping the handpiece with the fingers and thumb of the operator. A distal end 58 of the barrel 52 (shown in closeup in FIG. 4A) includes a threaded recess adapted to engage complementary threads of an orifice mount 62, which is configured to hold an orifice jewel 64 at an end thereof. The orifice mount 62 is tightly screwed into the distal end 58 of the barrel 52 to secure the orifice jewel 64 adjacent to a distal end of the passageway 52.

The orifice jewel 64 may comprise a circular, disc-like element having a small, substantially central orifice 66 formed therein. The orifice jewel 64 may be fabricated from a suitably rigid material that resists deformation under high pressure such as, for example, synthetic sapphire or ruby. The orifice mount 62 advantageously secures the orifice jewel 64 substantially perpendicular to the passageway 54 so that high pressure liquid in the passageway 54 can flow through the orifice 66 and emerge as a highly collimated beam of fluid traveling along a longitudinal jet axis 70 that is substantially coaxial with the barrel 52 of the handpiece 50. In some embodiments, the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 may include additional components, for example, to assist guiding or directing the jet 60 and/or to provide aspiration. Also, as further described below, the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 may be adapted to receive various end caps that assist guiding the jet 60 toward the pulp cavity 26.

FIG. 5A is a cross-section schematically illustrating the distal end 58 of an embodiment of the handpiece 50 to further illustrate formation of the jet 60. The orifice jewel 64 is secured at the distal end of the handpiece 50 and forms a tight seal to prevent leakage of high-pressure liquid 68 contained in the passageway 54. In the depicted embodiment, the orifice jewel 64 has a proximal side that is substantially flat and a distal side that is concave (e.g., thinnest near the orifice 66). The orifice 66 has a substantially circular cross-section with a diameter “D.” The axial length of sides 69 of the orifice 66 is “L.” The diameter D may be in a range from about 5 microns to about 1000 microns. Other diameter ranges are possible. In various embodiments, the diameter D may be in a range from about 10 microns to about 100 microns, a range from about 100 microns to about 500 microns, or range from about 500 microns to about 1000 microns. In various preferred embodiments, the orifice diameter D may be in a range of about 40-80 microns, a range of about 45-70 microns, or a range of about 45-65 microns. In one embodiment, the orifice diameter D is about 60 microns. The ratio of axial length L to diameter D may be about 50:1, 20:1, 10:1, 5:1, 1:1, or less. In one embodiment, the axial length L is about 500 microns. In certain embodiments, the ratio of axial length L to diameter D is selected so that transverse width of any boundary layers that may form on the sides 69 of the orifice 66 have a transverse width that is sufficiently small, for example, much less than the diameter D. In preferred embodiments, the orifice diameter is 40-80 microns, and more preferably 45-70 microns, and even more preferably 45-65 microns. The axial length of the orifice is preferably no greater than ten times the diameter of the orifice, and the liquid pressure at the input side of the orifice is 7,000 to 15,000 psi. In one embodiment, the orifice is about 60 microns in diameter, the axial length of the orifice about 500 microns, and the liquid pressure at the input side of the orifice about 11,000 psi. Since the output side of the orifice is at atmospheric pressure, the pressure drop at the orifice will be only slightly less than the pressure at the input side of the orifice. This combination of parameters provides a high velocity, high momentum, collimated, coherent liquid beam that is efficacious for cleaning without significant dentinal erosion.

In certain embodiments, the sides 69 of the orifice 66 are machined, polished, or otherwise processed to be substantially smooth in order to reduce or prevent formation of turbulence, cavitation, bubbles, fluid instabilities, or other effects that may interfere with substantially smooth, laminar flow of the liquid through the orifice 66. For example, in certain such embodiments, the sides 69 have a root-mean-square (rms) surface roughness less than about 10 microns, less than about 1 micron, or less than about 0.1 microns. In other embodiments, the rms surface roughness is much smaller than the diameter D of the orifice such as, for example, less than about 0.1 D, less than about 0.01 D, less than about 0.001 D, or less than about 0.0001 D. Additionally, highly demineralized liquids may be used to reduce buildup of impurities along the sides 69, which advantageously may increase the useful operating lifetime of the orifice jewel 64.

As schematically depicted in FIG. 5A, the high pressure liquid 68 in the passageway 54 emerges through the orifice 66 as a high-velocity, collimated jet 60 traveling substantially along the jet axis 70 with a velocity, v. In some embodiments of the compressor system 38, the jet velocity is estimated to be proportional to (P/ρ)^1/2, where P is the liquid pressure in the passageway 54 and ρ is the density of the liquid. In certain embodiments, water pressurized to about 10,700 psi emerges from the orifice as a jet 60 having a velocity of about 220 m/s. By adjusting the liquid pressure delivered by the compressor system 38, the handpiece 50 can deliver jets having different velocities. In some embodiments, the user interface 53 permits the operator to selectively adjust system pressures so that the velocity of the jet is suitable for a particular dental treatment.

In certain embodiments of the system 38, the liquid used to form the jet 60 is substantially free from dissolved gases (e.g., less than about 0.1% per volume). If the dissolved gas content of the liquid is too high, bubbles may formed at the nozzle orifice 66 due to the pressure drop. Additionally, the pressure drop should preferably be sufficiently low to prevent formation of vapor at the distal end of the orifice 66. The presence of substantial vapor, gas or bubbles, or particle contaminants in the liquid may cause a significant portion of the energy of the liquid jet 60 to be depleted, and there may be insufficient kinetic energy (and/or momentum) to provide efficient cleaning of the root canal system. When used for removing tissue and/or organic matter from root canals, the effectiveness of the device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,497,572, issued Dec. 24, 2002, and entitled “Apparatus for Dental Treatment Using High-Pressure Liquid Jet,” is significantly increased by using liquids that are free (or at least substantially free) of dissolved gases (as well as bubbles) to form the high-velocity jet. Preferably, the liquid is bubble-free distilled water, and the concentration of dissolved gases is no more than e.g. 0.1% by volume. In use, the liquid beam is preferably directed at the floor of the pulp chamber at an oblique angle relative to the long axis of the root canals. Although the chamber fills with liquid, the beam has sufficient velocity to impact the submerged dentin with great force. Upon impingement, the primary, collimated coherent beam from the jet apparatus generates a high-energy acoustic pressure wave that propagates along the body of the tooth. At the dentinal surfaces of the main and side canals, the acoustic wave causes any surrounding liquid to cavitate. This cavitation is a surface effect cavitation caused by conversion of the water (or other liquid) from a liquid state to a vapor state. Due to the high energy required for such conversion, collapse of the cavitation bubble occurs with great force against the surface of the dentin and cleans through creation of cavitation-induced sub-jets which radiate inward toward the surface from the point of collapse of the cavitating vapor. The substantially gas-free liquid is preferred for the above described cavitation process. If the dissolved gas content of the liquid is too high, bubbles will be formed at the nozzle orifice due to the pressure drop. Additionally, the pressure drop should preferably be sufficiently low to prevent formation of vapor at the nozzle orifice. The presence of significant vapor, gas or bubbles causes much of the energy of the beam to be depleted, and there will be insufficient energy to generate the liquid to vapor-phase cavitation, which is a surface effect.

The jet 60 emerges from the distal end of the orifice 66 as a beam of fluid traveling substantially parallel to the jet axis 70. Such jets are called “collimated” jets. In certain embodiments, the angular divergence of the jet 60 is less than about 1 degree, less than about 0.1 degree, or less than about 0.01 degree. In other embodiments, jet beams with different angular divergences may be used. In some embodiments, the jet 60 can travel as a collimated beam for a distance of about 1 to 3 inches before the jet 60 begins to disperse (e.g., due to entrainment of air). In certain embodiments, the jet 60 may travel a distance at least several thousand times the jet diameter D before beginning to disperse.

As described above, it may be advantageous for the sides 69 of the orifice 66 to be sufficiently smooth that liquid flows through the orifice 66 in a substantially laminar manner. In certain embodiments, the transverse width of any boundary layers formed along the sides 69 of the orifice 66 is much smaller than the diameter D, and, away from the boundary layers, the speed of the jet 60 is substantially constant across the width of the orifice. FIG. 5B is a graph schematically illustrating an example velocity profile of the jet 60 after it has emerged from the distal end of the orifice 66. The graph depicts flow velocity in the direction of the jet axis 70 versus a distance transverse (e.g., orthogonal) to the jet axis 70. In this example embodiment, away from narrow boundary layers near the outer surface of the jet 60 (e.g., near 0 and D on the graph), the jet velocity is substantially constant across the width of the jet. Jets having substantially constant velocity profiles are called “coherent” jets. In other embodiments, the velocity profile of the jet 60 is not substantially constant across the width of the jet 60. For example, the jet velocity profile in certain embodiments is a parabolic profile well-known from pipe flow.

In certain embodiments, the compressor system 38 is configured to deliver a coherent, collimated jet 60 of high-velocity liquid. A coherent, collimated jet will be denoted herein as a “CC jet.” The following example provides various representative properties of a CC jet 60 that can be generated using an embodiment of the system 38. In this example system, the diameter D and the axial length L of the orifice 66 are 60 microns and 500 microns, respectively. In one embodiment, the pressure of the liquid (degassed, distilled water) in the handpiece 50 is about 8,000 psi, which produces a jet velocity of about 190 m/s. The mass discharge rate of the jet is about 0.5 g/s, and the jet can produce a force of about 0.1 Newton when impacting a surface at normal incidence. The jet provides a kinetic power of about 10 Watts. If the jet is directed toward a tooth for about 10 seconds, the jet can deliver a momentum (or impulse) of about 1 kg m/s and an energy of about 100 Joules (about 23 calories).

In other embodiments, the CC jet is produced from liquid pressurized to about 2500 psi. The jet velocity is about 110 m/s, and volume flow rate is about 0.3 mL/s. The CC jet can produce about 2 W of kinetic power. The jet 60 may remain substantially collimated over propagation lengths from about 1 cm to about 30 cm in various embodiments.

The energy flux produced by the liquid jet is the kinetic power of the jet divided by the transverse area of the jet beam. The energy flux may be in a range from about 1 kW/cm²to about 1000 kW/cm². In some embodiments, the energy flux is in a range from about 50 kW/cm²to about 750 kW/cm², including, for example, 70 kW/cm², 175 kW/cm², 350 kW/cm², and 550 kW/cm². In one experiment, a CC jet was directed toward a dentinal surface of a tooth, and widespread acoustic noise (possibly due to acoustic cavitation) was detected in the tooth when the energy flux of the jet exceeded about 75 kW/cm². At the onset of detectable acoustic noise, the CC jet had the following properties: velocity of about 110 m/s, kinetic power of about 2 W, and mass flow rate of about 0.3 g/s. The pressure producing the CC jet was about 2500 psi.

By using different fluid working pressures and/or orifice diameters, jets having different properties can be generated. For example, in certain embodiments, the mass discharge rate may be in a range from about 0.01 g/s to about 1 g/s, the jet velocity may be in range from about 50 m/s to about 300 m/s, the jet force may be in a range from about 0.01 N to about 1 N, and the jet power may be in a range from about 0.1 W to about 50 W. In various endodontic treatments, the jet is applied to a tooth for a time in a range from about 1 second to 120 seconds. Accordingly, in such treatments, the jet can deliver momentum (or impulse) in a range of about 0.01 kg m/s to about 100 kg m/s, and energy in a range of about 0.1 J to about 500 J. In some embodiments, an energy range from about 20 J to about 400 J may be effective at providing cleaning of the root canal system without causing substantial erosion of dentin. A person of ordinary skill will recognize that the compressor system 38 can be configured to provide liquid jets having a wide range of properties that may be different from the example values and ranges provided herein, which are intended to be illustrative and non-limiting.

In various dental treatments, the compressor system 38 delivers a jet 60, which advantageously may be a CC jet, that is directed toward one or more portions of a tooth in order to, for example, excise and/or emulsify organic material, provide irrigation, and/or generate acoustic energy for delaminating organic matter from the pulp cavity 26.

FIG. 6A schematically illustrates one embodiment of an endodontic treatment for diseased pulp in the tooth 10. A drill or grinding tool is initially used to make an opening 80 in the tooth 10. The opening 80 may extend through the enamel 22 and the dentin 20 to expose and provide access to pulp in the pulp cavity 26. The opening 80 may be made in a top portion of the crown 12 of the tooth 10 (as shown in FIG. 3) or in another portion such as a side of the crown 12 or in the root 16 below the gum 14. The opening 80 may be sized and shaped as needed to provide suitable access to the diseased pulp and/or some or all of the canal spaces 30. In some treatment methods, additional openings may be formed in the tooth 10 to provide further access to the pulp and/or to provide dental irrigation.

The handpiece 50 may be used to deliver a jet 60 of liquid to a portion of the tooth 10. The jet 60 advantageously may, but need not, be a CC jet. The jet 60 can be used to cut through organic material in the pulp chamber 28. Additionally, as will be further described below, the jet 60 may be directed toward hard surfaces of the tooth 10 (e.g., the dentin 20) to generate acoustic energy, which may propagate through the dentin 20, the dentinal tubule, and the organic material in the root canal space 30. The acoustic energy causes detachment of organic material from the dentin 20 without requiring that the jet directly impact the organic material. In certain embodiments, the acoustic energy has been found to be effective in causing detachment of the entire body of pulp (and other organic material) from within the pulp chamber 28 and/or root canal space 30, without the use of endodontic files. The jet 60 preferably should have insufficient energy, energy flux, and/or momentum to damage or substantially erode the dentin 20.

In some treatment methods, the operator can maneuver the handpiece 50 to direct the jet 60 around the pulp chamber 28 during the treatment process. The distal end of the handpiece 50 may be held about 1 inch from the tooth 10 so that the liquid impacts a portion of the tooth 10 as a substantially collimated coherent beam. The jet 60 may provide sufficient force to cut through and/or emulsify some or all of the organic material in the pulp chamber 28. The flow of liquid from the jet 60 may create sufficient swirling or turbulent flow to remove the cut and/or emulsified organic material from the pulp cavity 26 so that it can be aspirated from the mouth of the patient. In other treatment embodiments, pulpal tissue in the pulp chamber 28 may be removed via conventional techniques prior to (and/or during) liquid jet treatment to expose a portion of the dentin 20. The jet 60 may then be directed to the exposed portion.

The jet 60 may be directed toward the floor 82 of the pulp chamber 28 (see, e.g., FIG. 7). In some methods, the jet 60 is directed toward the floor 82 (and/or walls) of the pulp chamber 28 advantageously at a substantial angle (e.g., 15-50 degrees) relative to the long axis of the root canal space 30 to ensure that the jet does not directly impact the apical portion of the canal space 30, thereby reducing a possibility that the force (and/or pressure) imparted by the jet 60 will cause damage to healthy tissue around the apical foramen 34. Accordingly, certain disclosed treatment methods advantageously may be used on “open apex” teeth having underdeveloped and/or enlarged apices, because impingement of the jet 60 in the pulp chamber 28 will not harm the periapical portion of the tooth 10. Additionally or optionally, the jet 60 can be directed toward one or more sides of the pulp chamber 28 so as to impact the dentin 20. In some embodiments, the jet is directed to several locations in or on the tooth 10. An advantage of some methods is that the impact of the jet 60 on the dentin 20 does not cause significant erosion or destruction of the dentin 20 within the tooth 10. Accordingly, such methods may be minimally invasive in comparison with conventional root canal procedures.

The pulp cavity 26 may fill with fluid during the treatment. For sufficiently high working pressures, the jet 60 will have sufficient velocity to impact submerged dentin 20 with enough force to provide effective treatment. In certain embodiments of the treatment method, one or more properties of the jet 60 are temporally varied during the treatment. For example, the working pressure may be varied to ramp up or ramp down the jet velocity or to cause the jet to alternate between high-speed flow and low-speed flow. The jet 60 may comprise a pulsed jet with pulsation amplitude and/or frequency selected to provide effective treatment. A combination of the above treatment methods may be used, serially or in alternation.

As noted above, detachment of the organic material within the root canal system from the surrounding dentin 20 does not require that the jet 60 impact the organic material in the root canal space 30. Rather, the jet 60 may be directed against a dentinal wall (e.g., in the pulp chamber 28), which couples acoustic energy to the tooth 10 so as to cause detachment of the organic material. In some methods, the detachment occurs relatively quickly after the jet 60 impinges on the dentinal wall (e.g., within a few seconds) and may occur substantially simultaneously throughout one or more root canal spaces 30 of the tooth 10.

In one presently preferred method schematically illustrated in FIG. 6B, the jet beam 60 is introduced into an inlet opening 84 formed in the side (e.g., buccal or lingual surface) of the tooth 10 with a conventional dental drill. The opening 84 may be formed near the cementoenamel junction 15. In some procedures, a portion of the gum 14 is depressed to provide access to the intended position of the opening 84 near the cementoenamel junction 15. The opening 84 may have a diameter in a range from about 1 mm to about 2 mm and may extend from the exterior surface of the tooth 10 to the pulp chamber 28. In some embodiments, the diameter is about 1.2 mm. Different diameters may be used in other embodiments. The opening 84 is thus generally transverse to the long axis of any root canal space 30 and ensures that the energy of the jet 60 will not be directed down any canal spaces 30. A benefit of providing the opening 84 in the side of the tooth 10 is that less hard tissue of the tooth 10 is damaged than if the opening were formed through the occlusal surface of the tooth 10. Although it is presently preferred to use a single inlet opening 84 to reduce invasiveness of the procedure, in other methods, two or more inlet openings may be used.

FIGS. 6C and 6D are cross-section views schematically illustrating an embodiment of a positioning member 130 that may be used to assist coupling and orienting the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 to the tooth 10 so that the high-velocity jet 60 is directed through the inlet opening 84 in the side of the tooth 10. In the illustrated embodiment, the positioning member 130 comprises a collar portion 134 that may be generally disk-like in shape. The collar portion 134 may have a width in a range from about 1 mm to about 10 mm. The collar portion 134 may have a substantially central opening 136 having a diameter approximately equal to the diameter of the inlet opening 84. In some embodiments, the collar portion 134 is formed from a flexible material (such as an elastomer) so that it can conform to the surface of the tooth 10. An adhesive (such as a light-cured orthodontic adhesive) may be included on a surface 134a of the collar portion 134 to enable the positioning member 130 to adhere to the tooth 10. In some embodiments, a detachable, elongated peg 138 may be used to position the position member 130 so that the central opening 136 in the collar portion 134 is aligned with the inlet opening 84 in the tooth 10. A distal end of the peg 138 may be sized to fit within the opening 84. When the positioning member 130 is in position on the tooth 10 and the adhesive has sufficiently cured, the peg 138 may be removed, leaving the positioning member 130 adhered to the side of the tooth 10 (see FIG. 6D). Additionally or alternatively, the collar portion 134 may include alignment guides disposed near the opening 136 to assist positioning the member 130 over the opening 84. For example, a circular ridge, having an outside diameter slightly smaller than the inside diameter of the opening 84, may be formed on the surface 134a around the opening 136 and used to align the openings 84 and 136.

The positioning member 130 may include mounting portions 132a configured to engage complementary mounting portions 132b disposed on the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50. For example, the mounting portions 132a, 132b may comprise a standard, quick-turn connector such as a Luer-lock. FIG. 6D schematically illustrates the handpiece 50 before (or after) engagement with the positioning member 130. When engaged with the positioning member 130, the handpiece 50 advantageously is oriented so that the jet axis 70 is substantially longitudinally aligned with the inlet opening 84. Moreover, the positioning member 130 may stabilize the handpiece 50 against unwanted movement. Accordingly, upon actuation, the jet 60 will be directed through the opening 84 and into the pulp cavity 26. As further described below with reference to FIG. 10B, the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 may comprise one or more pressure sensors adapted to sense when the distal end 58 is securely engaged with the positioning member 130. In such embodiments, the system may not permit the jet 60 to be actuated until a sufficiently secure fit and proper alignment are indicated by signals from the pressure sensors.

When the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 is engaged with the positioning member 130, the jet 60 may be directed through the inlet opening 84 so that it impacts the dentinal wall and causes detachment of the organic material in the root canal spaces 30. After the treatment is completed, the positioning member 130 may be removed from the tooth 10 using any well-known technique for releasing the adhesive. Remaining adhesive, if present, may function as bonding for restorative material used to close the defect.

To reduce possible buildup of fluid pressure within the pulp cavity 26, a relief opening 88 may be formed in the top side (e.g., occlusal surface) of the tooth 10. The relief opening 88 may be formed on a buccal or lingual surface. The diameter of the relief outlet or opening 88 may be larger than that of the inlet opening 84, for example, about 2 mm to about 3 mm. In some methods, the diameter of the relief opening 88 may be about the same as (or smaller than) the diameter of the inlet opening 84 (e.g., about 1.2 mm in one embodiment). The relief opening 88 also serves to facilitate debridement and evacuation of the detached organic material. The diameter of the relief opening 88 advantageously may be large enough to permit flushing out pulp fragments. In some methods, two or more relief openings 88 may be used.

Those skilled in dentistry will recognize that the inlet and relief openings 84, 88 are quite small relative to the openings required for conventional root canal procedures, thus preserving valuable tooth structure. For example, in some methods, even though two openings 84, 88 are used, less tooth material is removed than in a conventional root canal procedure using a single, standard-sized occlusal opening. Moreover, many patients have existing coronal defects (e.g., decay, restorations, preparations, etc.), and it may be possible to form one or both of the openings simply by removing material other than healthy tooth tissue, such as a filling. Fillings on one or more sides of the tooth 10 may also be used to form the openings 84, 88. In any event, once the jet has caused acoustically induced detachment of the organic material, low pressure flushing fluid (such as water) may be introduced into either or both the openings 84, 88 to irrigate the canal space 30 and flush out the organic material. Additionally and optionally, manual extraction of organic material may be performed with a dental instrument.

Certain teeth, particularly molars and/or wisdom teeth, may be difficult to access in conventional root canal therapies due to limited working space in the back of the mouth. Due to the difficulties or inconvenience of coronal access to these teeth in conventional root canal therapies, some of these teeth, which would otherwise be treatable, may instead be extracted. An advantage of some embodiments of the disclosed methods is that by permitting a wider range of access with the liquid jet 60 (e.g., on or through coronal, lingual, and/or buccal surfaces), the acoustic-induced detachment of organic material can save the tooth and reduce the likelihood of its extraction.

Without subscribing to any particular theory of operation, FIG. 7 schematically illustrates an explanation for the effectiveness of the treatment methods described herein. FIG. 7 depicts the jet 60 impacting the dentin 20 of the tooth 10. Upon impact, a portion of the energy and/or momentum carried by the jet 60 generates an acoustic pressure wave 100 that propagates through the body of the tooth 10. In addition to propagating through the dentin 20, the acoustic wave 100 may propagate through organic material in the root canal space 30 and in the tubules of the dentin 20. The acoustic wave 100 may include acoustic energy with acoustic frequencies in a range from about 1 Hz to above 5 MHz such as, for example, up to about 10 MHz. The acoustic wave 100 may have frequency components in the ultrasonic frequency range, e.g., above about 20 kHz. In some cases, the frequency range may include megasonic frequencies above about 1 MHz. The acoustic wave 100 may include other frequencies as well.

At the dentinal surfaces of the root canal space 30 and tubules, the acoustic wave 100 may cause surrounding liquid to cavitate. This cavitation may be a surface effect cavitation caused by conversion of the water (or other liquid) from a liquid state to a vapor state. If the acoustic energy in the wave 100 is sufficiently large, the cavitation processes may include inertial cavitation wherein sufficiently low pressures caused by the acoustic wave 100 induce formation and collapse of bubbles in liquid near the dentinal surfaces. For smaller acoustic energies, non-inertial (or gas) cavitation may play a more significant role. In such cases, dissolved gases, tissue debris, and impurities act as nucleation centers for the formation of cavitation bubbles. Cavitation may also occur at pore sites across the microporous surface of the dentin 20. The cavitation bubbles oscillate in response to the acoustic wave 100, and amplitude of the oscillations may grow as additional gas is absorbed by the bubble.

Due to the relatively high energy required for formation of cavitation bubbles, collapse of the cavitation bubble occurs with great force against the surface of the dentin 20. Bubble collapse near a surface is known to occur asymmetrically and may result in formation of cavitation jets that radiate toward the surface and produce locally very high pressures and/or elevated temperatures. In some cases, the acoustic wave 100 may also generate fluid motions (acoustic streaming) that enhance disruption of organic matter. Acoustic streaming also may be effective at transporting or flushing detached organic matter out of the root canal space 30 and/or the tubules.

Accordingly, in certain methods, the acoustic wave 100 cleans the root canal system through processes including formation and collapse of cavitation bubbles, radiation of cavitation jets toward dentinal surfaces, acoustic streaming, or a combination thereof. In the process, the organic material may be broken into small pieces or particles, which can be irrigated from the pulp cavity 26. In some treatment methods, these cavitation processes may produce transient, localized high pressure and/or elevated temperature zones that disrupt, detach, and/or delaminate organic matter near root canal surfaces. For example, cavitation-induced effects may detach odontoblasts from the dentinal surface and effectively remove a portion of the odontoblastic process from the tubule. Cavitation-induced effects may also disrupt and/or detach the collagen fibrils that attach the odontoblast layer to the pulp in the interior of the canal space 30. Cavitation-induced effects may also occur in interior regions of the pulp cavity 26 (e.g., away from the dentinal surfaces) and may disrupt and/or loosen organic material in the interior regions, thereby making this material more readily removable from the pulp cavity 26.

Cavitation effects are believed to be formed everywhere the acoustic wave 100 propagates with sufficient energy. Accordingly, it is advantageous for the jet 60 to have sufficient energy and/or momentum to generate an acoustic wave 100 capable of causing cavitation effects throughout substantially the entire root canal system but without causing harm to the tooth 10. For example, if the jet diameter D is too small and the momentum of the jet beam too high, impact of the beam may cause significant dentinal erosion. On the other hand, if the beam diameter D is too large and the momentum of the jet beam too low, the beam may have insufficient energy to produce an acoustic pressure wave 100 capable of causing cavitation. For example, in certain methods, the jet energy incident on the tooth is greater than about 20 J to provide effective cleaning but less than about 400 J to prevent dentinal erosion. In some methods, acoustic cavitation effects occur substantially throughout the root canal system when certain jet 60 properties are above threshold values. For example, in one experiment mentioned above, widespread acoustic noise (possibly caused by acoustic cavitation) was detected in a tooth only when the energy flux of the jet 60 was greater than about 75 kW/cm². At the onset of detectable acoustic noise, the jet had a power of about 2 W, a velocity of about 115 m/s, a mass flow rate of about 0.3 g/s, and provided a force of about 0.03 N. The efficiency of conversion of jet kinetic energy into acoustic energy was estimated to be about 2%.

A portion of the acoustic wave 100 may also propagate through tissue and bone adjacent the tooth 10. However, the energy carried by this portion of the acoustic wave 100 may be relatively small due to the acoustic impedance mismatch between the dentin 20 and nearby tissues and bone. Accordingly, cavitation-induced effects may be substantially reduced in tissues surrounding the tooth 10, and the endodontic methods described herein will not significantly damage the surrounding tissues.

FIGS. 8A and 8B are cross-section views that schematically illustrate some of the cavitation processes that clean a surface 104 of the dentin 20. As depicted in FIG. 8A, odontoblasts 106 are located near the surface and the odontoblastic process extends into the tubules 108. The acoustic wave 100 induces oscillation and collapse of cavitation bubbles 110, which generates transient localized heat and/or pressure that disrupts and detaches the odontoblasts 106 from the dentinal surface 104. Cavitation bubbles may also form and collapse within the tubules 108, thereby causing disruption of the odontoblastic processes in the tubules 108. FIG. 8B schematically depicts collapse of an initially spherical cavitation bubble 110 (shown in (i)) located near the body of organic matter 112 adjacent the dentinal surface 104 and filling the canal. In (ii), the side of the bubble 110 away from the surface 104 is perturbed from its spherical shape. In (iii), fluid 114 from the interior of the pulp cavity 26 penetrates the perturbed side of the bubble 110. In (iv) the fluid 114 has formed a cavitation jet 116 radiating toward the surface 104. The energy and momentum of the cavitation jet 116 breaks up and disperses the organic matter 112.

FIGS. 9A-9C are scanning electron microscope photographs of the dentinal surface showing the surprising effectiveness of the removal of organic matter by the acoustic effect. FIG. 9A shows dentinal tubules in an apical area of a mature tooth magnified 1000×. FIGS. 9B and 9C show dentin and dentinal tubules magnified 1000× in an inclusion area of a juvenile tooth (FIG. 9B) and in a medial area of a mature root (FIG. 9C). A bar at the top left of each photo indicates the linear scale (in microns) for each photograph. As can be seen in FIGS. 9A-9C, the dentinal surfaces are almost entirely free from organic matter, which appears to have been literally ripped away from the dentin. Flow of liquid in the root canal space 30 flushes and irrigates the organic matter from substantially all the root canal space 30 and the tubules. Returning to FIG. 2, this photograph shows an apical area of a mature tooth magnified 2000× and viewed at a slight slant from perpendicular to show that the tubules have been cleaned down to a distance of about 3 microns. FIGS. 2 and 9A-9C demonstrate that cleaning of the dentinal surface is very effective and that almost no remnants of organic material remain after treatment.

As mentioned previously, it has been found that the cleaning does not require that the liquid jet 60 be aimed down the root canal space 30, although that may be beneficial in certain isolated cases where the canal space 30 is very narrow and/or filled with dry material. Additionally, it has been found in some embodiments that the pulp cavity 26 need not be prepared or pre-treated (e.g., by removing root canal matter with one or more endodontic files) before application of the jet. Impingement of the jet 60 onto the dentin 20 in the pulp chamber 28 is sufficient in most cases to generate the acoustic wave 100 that causes the cleaning. Accordingly, in most cases, it is the acoustic wave 100 and not direct impact of the jet 60 that causes the cleaning, particularly for the dentinal surfaces near the apex of the root canal space 30, which are remote from the pulp chamber 28. For example, examination of FIGS. 2 and 9A-9C shows that organic material has been removed from apical dentinal tubules, which are not possible to reach directly with the liquid jet beam. In certain embodiments, the jet beam 60 is capable of delivering sufficient energy to the tooth 10 to remove at least 90 percent of the organic material from the root canal system. In other embodiments, at least 95 percent of the organic material is removed. Preferably, the jet beam should be capable of removing substantially all the organic material from the root canal space 30 and from at least a portion of the tubules. The treatment time during which the high-velocity jet is directed toward the tooth 10 may range from about 1 second to about 120 seconds. In some embodiments, the treatment time is from about 10 seconds to about 30 seconds. In other embodiments, the treatment time is no more than 10 seconds such as, for example, less than about 5 seconds, less than about 2 seconds, less than about 1 second, less than about 0.5 second, or less than about 0.1 second.

The high-velocity jet 60 may produce significant mechanical power (e.g., tens of Watts in some embodiments). When the jet 60 is directed toward the tooth 10, a fraction of this mechanical power may go toward heating the tooth 10 as well as nearby teeth and gums. To avoid discomfort to the patient, in some embodiments, excess heat, if present, may be removed by, for example, irrigating the tooth under treatment with a stream of liquid (e.g., water at room temperature or cooler). The stream of liquid can absorb and carry away some or all of the excess heat, if present, that may be produced by the jet 60. The stream of liquid may be aspirated from the patient's mouth.

The methods described herein may be used as standalone treatments for root canal procedures, or they may be used in conjunction with other dental treatments (which may or may not involve liquid jet methods).

The high-velocity jet treatment methods described herein may be particularly effective in certain system operating ranges. For example, a jet having an energy flux greater than about 75 kW/cm²may be particularly effective.

The apparatus and methods described above may include additional devices and components configured to provide additional functionality to the endodontic treatment system. FIGS. 10A-10H schematically illustrate embodiments of a contact member configured as a cap 120 that may be attached to and detached from the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50. In some embodiments, the cap 120 may have threads that engage complimentary threads on the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 (see, e.g., FIG. 10B). The cap 120 can be fitted around the crown 12 of the tooth 10 and used to orient the jet 60 toward a suitable opening into the pulp chamber 26. The cap 120 may be used to orient the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 so that the liquid jet 60 is directed obliquely at a dentinal surface on the floor 82 (and/or sides) of the pulp cavity 26 and not directly down any of the canal space 30. The cap 120 may be formed from a transparent or translucent material and may be sufficiently flexible to fit around teeth having a range of sizes. In some embodiments, the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 may be rotatable and/or extendable with respect to the cap 120 so that the jet 60 may be moved closer to or further from a desired tooth portion. The cap 120 may include an outflow opening to permit organic material and liquid to be evacuated from the tooth 10. Alternatively, the cap may include a suction port so that fluid may be removed from the pulp chamber at substantially the same volume as it is introduced. The suction port thus prevents any of the removed diseased tissue and liquid from entering the patient's mouth. Another aspect of the invention comprises introducing a volume of liquid in the form of a jet into a pulp chamber of a tooth and removing a volume of liquid from the pulp chamber at substantially the same rate that it is introduced. Preferably, removal is accomplished by suction. In certain embodiments, the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 may include multiple orifices which provide multiple jets, and the cap 120 may be used to orient the handpiece 50 such that jets are directed not only at the floor 82 (and/or sides) of the pulp chamber 28, but also towards entrances to the canal spaces 30. In some embodiments, the handpiece 50 may also be tilted and rotated to allow the jet 60 to be aimed axially into all canal openings.

As schematically shown in FIGS. 10C-10H, a plurality of caps 120 may be configured to fit over teeth of different sizes and shapes. Advantageously, each different cap 120 may be color coded to permit easy selection by the dentist during a treatment procedure. The cap 120 may also be sized and shaped to fit within an opening formed in the tooth 10 at the beginning of certain endodontic procedures (such as the openings 80, 84, and 88; see FIGS. 6A-6C), rather than fitting over or around the exterior of the tooth 10.

As depicted in the partially exploded cross-section view shown in FIG. 10B, the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 may include one or more pressure sensors 124. As the cap 120 is urged onto a tooth (or into an opening in the tooth), the pressure sensor 124 provides a signal that indicates when a sufficiently “tight” fit has been achieved. The pressure sensor 124 may be electrically connected to the controller 52, and enables the jet 60 to operate only when the sensor senses contact. A suitable audible, visible, and/or tactile signal may be output (e.g., by the user interface 54 or by an output device on the handpiece 50) to indicate that the cap 120 is in position on the tooth 10.

The system may also include a distance sensor to indicate the distance between the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 and a surface of the tooth 10. The distance sensor may provide an audible, tactile, and/or visible indication when the distal end 58 is at a suitable distance from the surface for operation of the liquid jet 60 (e.g., not too close to damage the tooth and not too far for the jet to be ineffective). In one embodiment, the distance sensor comprises a pair of optical elements mounted on the handpiece and spaced from each other. Each optical element directs an optical beam that intersects the other beam a predetermined distance away from the handpiece 50. The operator of the handpiece 50 can maneuver the handpiece 50 until the intersecting beams illuminate a desired portion of the tooth 10 and then actuate the liquid jet 60. The optical elements may comprise light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and/or lasers. In some embodiments, more than two optical elements may be used (e.g., to indicate a range of distances).

A person of ordinary skill will recognize that a wide variety of sensors may be used in addition to or instead of the pressure sensor 124 and/or the distance sensor. For example, certain embodiments utilize one or more electric, magnetic, acoustic, and/or optical sensors to determine position and/or orientation of the handpiece 50 (or portions thereof) in the mouth. For example, proximity sensors, including capacitive sensors, ultrasonic sensors, light reflectance sensors, magnetic inductance sensors, and so forth, may be used. Certain embodiments may comprise one or more orientation sensors (e.g., accelerometers) configured to sense the orientation of the longitudinal jet axis 70 relative to one or more reference landmarks in the mouth (e.g., a portion of the tooth 10 such as the openings 80, 84, 88). The system may include a timer configured to deactuate the jet 60 after a predetermined time interval to reduce likelihood of damage to the tooth 10 and/or root canal system. Systems comprising one or more such sensors advantageously may provide increased safety. For example, certain such embodiments may prevent (or inhibit) an operator from actuating the liquid jet 60 until the distal end 58 of the handpiece 50 is suitably positioned and/or oriented adjacent the tooth 10.

As described herein, acoustic energy capable of producing cavitation may be particularly effective at cleaning the root canal system. It has been found that this acoustic energy may be efficiently produced by directing a high-velocity beam of liquid onto a portion of the tooth. However, the scope of the present disclosure is not limited to methods using high-velocity jets. In other embodiments, the acoustic energy is generated by vibrating mechanical devices (e.g., a piezoelectric transducer), ultrasonic (or megasonic) generators (e.g., an ultrasonic and/or a megasonic horn), or any other component capable of producing acoustic vibrations. FIG. 11 schematically illustrates one method for generating the acoustic wave 100 using a piezoelectric transducer 144. In this method, an enclosure 142 is attached to the tooth 10. The enclosure 142 comprises a chamber 140 filled with a liquid (e.g., water). The transducer 144 is disposed in or on the chamber 140. When actuated, the transducer 144 vibrates, which causes the acoustic wave 100 to propagate through the surrounding fluid and the tooth 10. The acoustic wave 100 cleans the root canal system substantially as described above. Because the vibrating transducer 144 is not in direct contact with the tooth 10, possible damage to the tooth 10 is reduced or eliminated. Although in FIG. 11 a mechanical transducer 144 is used to generate the acoustic wave 100, in other embodiments, the acoustic wave 100 may be produced by, for example, directing the high-velocity liquid jet into or onto the enclosure 142. In such embodiments, the enclosure 142 acts as an “acoustic waveguide” converting jet kinetic energy into acoustic energy that propagates through the tooth 10 as the acoustic wave 100. Beneficially, the liquid in the chamber 140 may absorb excess mechanical energy which may otherwise produce unwanted heat in the tooth 10. In another embodiment, an ultrasonic horn is disposed near the enclosure 142 and used to generate the acoustic wave 100.

Any of the procedures described herein may be carried out with the use of a rubber dam. Further although the tooth 10 depicted in the figures is a molar, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the procedures may be performed on any type of tooth such as an incisor, a canine, a bicuspid, or a molar. Also, the disclosed methods are capable of cleaning root canal spaces having a wide range of morphologies, including highly curved root canal spaces which are difficult to clean using conventional dental techniques. Moreover, the disclosed methods may be performed on human teeth (including children's teeth) and/or on animal teeth.

The foregoing description sets forth various preferred embodiments and other illustrative but non-limiting embodiments of the inventions disclosed herein. The description provides details regarding combinations, modes, and uses of the disclosed inventions. Other variations, combinations, modifications, equivalents, modes, uses, implementations, and/or applications of the disclosed features and aspects of the embodiments are also within the scope of this disclosure, including those that become apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading this specification. Additionally, certain objects and advantages of the inventions are described herein. It is to be understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may be achieved in any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will recognize that the inventions may be embodied or carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein. Also, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations making up the method/process may be performed in any suitable sequence and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence.

Accordingly, the scope of the inventions disclosed herein is to be determined according to the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. An apparatus for treating a tooth, the apparatus comprising: an enclosure having a mounting surface configured to be positioned against a tooth surface over a treatment region of the tooth, the enclosure configured to define a chamber to be filled with a liquid when the enclosure is positioned against the tooth; anda pressure wave generator coupled with the enclosure and exposed to at least a portion of the chamber of the enclosure, the pressure wave generator configured to direct a collimated energy beam into the liquid,wherein, when the collimated energy beam passes into the liquid, the collimated energy beam generates pressure waves that propagate through the liquid, the apparatus configured such that the generated pressure waves create at least some cavitation in the liquid, the generated pressure waves having sufficient energy to clean the treatment region.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the pressure wave generator comprises a liquid jet device and the collimated energy beam comprises a liquid jet.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the liquid jet device comprises a liquid pressurization portion which pressurizes the liquid and a liquid beam forming portion in fluid communication with the pressurization portion, said beam forming portion comprising an orifice that receives the pressurized liquid, said orifice sized and shaped to convert the pressurized liquid into the liquid jet, the liquid jet comprising a high velocity collimated beam that produces an acoustic wave upon impact with a surface, the energy of said wave causing organic material to be detached from dentin.
4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said orifice has a transverse width in a range from about 10 microns to about 200 microns.
5. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said orifice has an axial length in a range from about 50 microns to about 1000 microns.
6. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein a diameter of the orifice is in a range from about 10 microns to about 100 microns.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the diameter of the orifice is in a range from about 45 microns to about 65 microns.
8. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein sides of the orifice have a root-mean-square surface roughness less than about 10 microns.
9. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein a pressure of the liquid used to produce the liquid jet is in a range from about 2,000 psi to about 11,000 psi.
10. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein a pressure of the liquid used to produce the liquid jet is in a range from about 7,000 psi to 15,000 psi.
11. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the liquid jet has an energy flux in a range from about 50 kW/cm2 to about 1000 kW/cm2.
12. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the liquid jet has a velocity in a range from about 50 m/s to about 300 m/s.
13. The apparatus of claim 2, further comprising a pump configured to pressurize the liquid that forms the liquid jet.
14. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the pressure waves comprises frequencies comprising widespread acoustic noise.
15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the frequencies comprise frequencies in a range from about 1 Hz to about 10 MHz.
16. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the enclosure comprises a cap configured to be applied to the tooth to substantially retain the liquid in the chamber.
17. The apparatus of claim 16, the cap further including an outflow opening to permit organic material and liquid to be evacuated from the treatment region of the tooth.
18. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the cap includes a suction port configured to remove fluid from the treatment region of the tooth at substantially the same rate that it is introduced.
19. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the pressure wave generator comprises an orifice exposed to the chamber of the cap.
20. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a suction port configured to remove liquid from the chamber of the enclosure.
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the enclosure comprises a contact member on a distal end of a handpiece, said contact member configured to contact the tooth and stabilize the handpiece against unwanted movement relative to the tooth.
22. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a controller in operable communication with the pressure wave generator.
23. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a fluid source for supplying the liquid to the pressure wave generator.
24. The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the fluid source is configured to be filled with and to deliver a substantially gas-free liquid to the tooth.
25. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the substantially gas-free liquid includes less than 1% dissolved gases by volume.
26. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the pressure wave generator is configured to deliver greater than about 20 J of energy to the treatment region.
27. An apparatus for treating a tooth, the apparatus comprising: an enclosure having a mounting surface configured to be positioned against a tooth surface over a treatment region of the tooth, the enclosure configured to define a chamber to be filled with a liquid when the enclosure is positioned against the tooth; anda pressure wave generator coupled to the enclosure, the pressure wave generator configured to direct a collimated energy beam into or onto the enclosure into the liquid to generate pressure waves having energy sufficient to clean the treatment region.
28. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the pressure wave generator and the enclosure cooperate to generate liquid motion in the treatment region of the tooth.
29. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the pressure wave generator comprises a liquid jet device, and wherein the collimated energy beam comprises a collimated liquid jet.
30. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the liquid jet device comprises a liquid pressurization portion which pressurizes the liquid and a liquid beam forming portion in fluid communication with the pressurization portion, said beam forming portion comprising an orifice that receives the pressurized liquid, said orifice sized and shaped to convert the pressurized liquid into the liquid jet, the liquid jet comprising a high velocity collimated beam that produces an acoustic wave upon impact with a surface, the energy of said wave causing organic material to be detached from dentin.
31. The apparatus of claim 29, further comprising a pump configured to pressurize the liquid that forms the liquid jet.
32. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the pressure waves comprises frequencies comprising widespread acoustic noise.
33. The apparatus of claim 32, wherein the frequencies comprise frequencies in a range from about 1 Hz to about 10 MHz.
34. The apparatus of claim 27, further comprising a suction port configured to remove fluid from the tooth.
35. The apparatus of claim 27, further comprising a controller in operable communication with the pressure wave generator.
36. The apparatus of claim 27, further comprising a fluid source configured to be filled with and to deliver a substantially gas-free liquid to the tooth.
37. The apparatus of claim 36, wherein the substantially gas-free liquid includes less than 1% dissolved gases by volume.
38. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the pressure wave generator is configured to deliver greater than about 20 J of energy to the treatment region.
39. An apparatus for treating a tooth, the apparatus comprising: an enclosure having a mounting surface configured to be positioned against a tooth surface over a treatment region of the tooth, the enclosure configured to define a chamber to be filled with a liquid when the enclosure is positioned against the tooth; anda pressure wave generator coupled with the enclosure, the pressure wave generator configured to direct a collimated energy beam into or onto the enclosure into the liquid to generate pressure waves in the liquid having energy sufficient to clean the treatment region,wherein the pressure waves generated in the liquid comprise frequencies comprising widespread acoustic noise.
40. The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the pressure wave generator comprises a liquid jet device.
41. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the liquid jet device comprises a liquid pressurization portion which pressurizes the liquid and a liquid beam forming portion in fluid communication with the pressurization portion, said beam forming portion comprising an orifice that receives the pressurized liquid, said orifice sized and shaped to convert the pressurized liquid into the liquid jet, the liquid jet comprising a high velocity collimated beam that produces an acoustic wave upon impact with a surface, the energy of said wave causing organic material to be detached from dentin.
42. The apparatus of claim 41, further comprising a pump configured to pressurize the liquid that forms the liquid jet.
43. The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the frequencies comprise frequencies in a range from about 1 Hz to about 10 MHz.
44. The apparatus of claim 39, further comprising a fluid source for supplying the liquid to the pressure wave generator.
45. The apparatus of claim 44, wherein the fluid source is configured to be filled with and to deliver a substantially gas-free liquid to the tooth.
46. The apparatus of claim 45, wherein the substantially gas-free liquid includes less than 1% dissolved gases by volume.
47. The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the pressure wave generator is exposed to at least a portion of the chamber of the enclosure.
48. The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the pressure wave generator is configured to deliver greater than about 20 J of energy to the treatment region.
49. An apparatus for removing organic material from a treatment region of a tooth, comprising: a fluid source arranged to deliver a substantially gas-free liquid to the treatment region;an enclosure having a mounting surface configured to be positioned against a tooth surface over the treatment region of the tooth, the enclosure configured to define a chamber to be filled with the substantially gas-free liquid when the enclosure is positioned against the tooth; anda pressure wave generator coupled with the enclosure, the pressure wave generator configured to direct a collimated energy beam into the delivered liquid to propagate pressure waves through the delivered liquid,wherein the pressure waves have sufficient energy to cause organic material in the treatment region to be detached from surrounding dentin when the substantially gas-free liquid is at the treatment region.
50. The apparatus of claim 49, wherein the pressure wave generator comprises a liquid jet device.
51. The apparatus of claim 50, wherein the liquid jet device comprises a liquid pressurization portion which pressurizes the liquid and a liquid beam forming portion in fluid communication with the pressurization portion, said beam forming portion comprising an orifice that receives the pressurized liquid, said orifice sized and shaped to convert the pressurized liquid into the liquid jet, the liquid jet comprising a high velocity collimated beam that produces an acoustic wave upon impact with a surface, the energy of said wave causing organic material to be detached from dentin.
52. The apparatus of claim 49, wherein the pressure waves comprises frequencies comprising widespread acoustic noise.
53. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the frequencies comprise frequencies in a range from about 1 Hz to about 10 MHz.
54. The apparatus of claim 49, further comprising a suction port to remove liquid from the chamber of the enclosure.
55. The apparatus of claim 49, wherein the pressure wave generator is configured to deliver greater than about 20 J of energy to the treatment region.
56. A method for treating a tooth, the method comprising: positioning a mounting surface of an enclosure against a tooth surface over a treatment region of the tooth to define a chamber;supplying fluid to the treatment region of the tooth and the chamber; anddirecting a collimated energy beam into the supplied fluid to generate pressure waves through the fluid, the generated pressure waves creating at least some cavitation in the supplied fluid, the generated pressure waves having energy sufficient to clean the treatment region.
57. The method of claim 56, wherein supplying fluid comprises supplying a substantially gas-free fluid.
58. The method of claim 56, wherein directing the collimated energy beam comprises directing a liquid jet.
59. A method for treating an infected or decaying condition in a treatment region including a pulp chamber and a root canal of a tooth, the method comprising: providing a liquid medium at the treatment region of the tooth that includes the infected or decaying condition;generating a collimated energy beam with a pressure wave generator;directing the collimated energy beam into the liquid medium present at the pulp chamber of the tooth; andgenerating pressure waves within the liquid medium having sufficient energy to remove infected or decaying material from the tooth at the treatment region, including at locations remote from the pressure wave generator and without requiring that the collimated energy beam be directed down the root canal.
60. The method of claim 59, further comprising pulsing the collimated energy beam.
61. The method of claim 60, wherein the pulsed collimated energy beam has a pulse frequency in a range from about 0.1 Hz to about 10 MHz.
62. The method of claim 59, additionally comprising generating pressure waves of sufficient energy to create surface-effect cavitation at an infected or decaying surface of the tooth.
63. The method of claim 59, wherein generating a collimated energy beam comprises activating a liquid jet device to produce a collimated liquid jet and varying the liquid pressure within the liquid jet device.
64. The method of claim 63, additionally comprising activating a pump to pressurize the liquid that forms the liquid jet.
65. The method of claim 64, wherein a pressure of the liquid that forms the liquid jet is in a range from about 2,000 psi to about 11,000 psi.
66. The method of claim 59, wherein the generated pressure waves comprise frequencies within a widespread range of acoustic noise.
67. The method of claim 66, wherein the frequencies comprise frequencies in a range from about 1 Hz to about 10 MHz.
68. The method of claim 59, further comprising removing substantially all organic material from lateral canal branches.
69. The method of claim 59, additionally comprising applying a cap to the tooth, the cap disposed about the pressure wave generator.
70. The method of claim 59, additionally comprising removing fluid from the treatment region through a suction port.
71. The method of claim 59, wherein providing the liquid medium comprises supplying a substantially gas-free fluid.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/304,737, filed Jun. 13, 2014, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ROOT CANALS OF TEETH,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/737,710, filed Apr. 19, 2007, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ROOT CANALS OF TEETH,” which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/793,452, filed Apr. 20, 2006, entitled “APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ROOT CANALS OF TEETH,” the entire contents of each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (506)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
1500107	Chandler	Jul 1924	A
2108558	Jackman	Feb 1938	A
3023306	Kester	Feb 1962	A
3401690	Martin	Sep 1968	A
3460255	Hutson	Aug 1969	A
3514328	Malin	May 1970	A
3521359	Harris	Jul 1970	A
3522801	Seymour	Aug 1970	A
3547110	Balamuth	Dec 1970	A
3561433	Kovach	Feb 1971	A
3590813	Roszyk	Jul 1971	A
3624907	Brass et al.	Dec 1971	A
3703170	Ryckman, Jr.	Nov 1972	A
3756225	Moret et al.	Sep 1973	A
3828770	Kuris et al.	Aug 1974	A
3921296	Harris	Nov 1975	A
3930505	Wallach	Jan 1976	A
3962790	Riitano et al.	Jun 1976	A
4021921	Detaille	May 1977	A
4060600	Vit	Nov 1977	A
4215476	Armstrong	Aug 1980	A
4247288	Yoshii et al.	Jan 1981	A
4274555	Sneider	Jun 1981	A
4276880	Malmin	Jul 1981	A
4293188	McMahon	Oct 1981	A
4376835	Schmitt et al.	Mar 1983	A
4386911	Maloney et al.	Jun 1983	A
4424036	Lokken	Jan 1984	A
4474251	Johnson, Jr.	Feb 1984	A
4462803	Landgraf et al.	Jul 1984	A
4492575	Mabille	Jan 1985	A
4534542	Russo	Aug 1985	A
4539987	Nath et al.	Sep 1985	A
4608017	Sadohara	Aug 1986	A
4659218	de Lasa et al.	Apr 1987	A
4661070	Friedman	Apr 1987	A
4671259	Kirchner	Jun 1987	A
4676586	Jones et al.	Jun 1987	A
4676749	Mabille	Jun 1987	A
4684781	Frish et al.	Aug 1987	A
4732193	Gibbs	Mar 1988	A
4789335	Geller et al.	Dec 1988	A
4872837	Issalene et al.	Oct 1989	A
4917603	Haack	Apr 1990	A
4941459	Mathur	Jul 1990	A
4957436	Ryder	Sep 1990	A
4973246	Black et al.	Nov 1990	A
4985027	Dressel	Jan 1991	A
4992048	Goof	Feb 1991	A
4993947	Grosrey	Feb 1991	A
5013300	Williams	May 1991	A
5029576	Evans, Sr.	Jul 1991	A
5037431	Summers et al.	Aug 1991	A
5046950	Favonio	Sep 1991	A
5055048	Vassiliadis et al.	Oct 1991	A
5066232	Negri et al.	Nov 1991	A
5094256	Barth	Mar 1992	A
5112224	Shirota	May 1992	A
5116227	Levy	May 1992	A
5173049	Levy	Dec 1992	A
5173050	Dillon	Dec 1992	A
5188532	Levy	Feb 1993	A
5188634	Hussein et al.	Feb 1993	A
5194723	Cates et al.	Mar 1993	A
5195952	Solnit et al.	Mar 1993	A
5224942	Beuchat et al.	Jul 1993	A
5267856	Wolbarsht et al.	Dec 1993	A
5267995	Doiron et al.	Dec 1993	A
5269777	Doiron et al.	Dec 1993	A
5292253	Levy	Mar 1994	A
5295828	Grosrey	Mar 1994	A
5307839	Loebker et al.	May 1994	A
5322504	Doherty et al.	Jun 1994	A
5324200	Vassiliadis et al.	Jun 1994	A
5326263	Weissman	Jul 1994	A
5334019	Goldsmith et al.	Aug 1994	A
5380201	Kawata	Jan 1995	A
5387376	Gasser	Feb 1995	A
D356866	Meller	Mar 1995	S
5399089	Eichman et al.	Mar 1995	A
5428699	Pon	Jun 1995	A
5435724	Goodman et al.	Jul 1995	A
5474451	Dalrymple et al.	Dec 1995	A
5490779	Malmin	Feb 1996	A
5503559	Vari	Apr 1996	A
5540587	Malmin	Jul 1996	A
5547376	Harrel	Aug 1996	A
5554896	Hogan	Sep 1996	A
5562692	Bair	Oct 1996	A
5564929	Alpert	Oct 1996	A
5570182	Nathel et al.	Oct 1996	A
5591184	McDonnell et al.	Jan 1997	A
5601430	Kutsch et al.	Feb 1997	A
5620414	Campbell, Jr.	Apr 1997	A
5639239	Earle	Jun 1997	A
5642997	Gregg et al.	Jul 1997	A
5643299	Bair	Jul 1997	A
5660817	Masterman et al.	Aug 1997	A
5662501	Levy	Sep 1997	A
5674226	Doherty et al.	Oct 1997	A
5688486	Watson et al.	Nov 1997	A
5720894	Neev et al.	Feb 1998	A
5730727	Russo	Mar 1998	A
5735815	Bair	Apr 1998	A
5740291	De Lasa et al.	Apr 1998	A
5755752	Segal	May 1998	A
5759159	Masreliez	Jun 1998	A
5762501	Levy	Jun 1998	A
5795153	Rechmann	Aug 1998	A
5797745	Ruddle	Aug 1998	A
5810037	Sasaki et al.	Sep 1998	A
5816807	Matsutani et al.	Oct 1998	A
5820373	Okano et al.	Oct 1998	A
5825958	Gollihar et al.	Oct 1998	A
5839896	Hickok et al.	Nov 1998	A
5842863	Bruns et al.	Dec 1998	A
5846080	Schneider	Dec 1998	A
5853384	Bair	Dec 1998	A
5865790	Bair	Feb 1999	A
5868570	Hickok et al.	Feb 1999	A
5874677	Bab et al.	Feb 1999	A
5879160	Ruddle	Mar 1999	A
5897314	Hack et al.	Apr 1999	A
5915965	Ohlsson et al.	Jun 1999	A
5921775	Buchanan	Jul 1999	A
5968039	Deutsch	Oct 1999	A
5975897	Propp et al.	Nov 1999	A
5989023	Summer et al.	Nov 1999	A
6004319	Goble et al.	Dec 1999	A
6019605	Myers	Feb 2000	A
6053735	Buchanan	Apr 2000	A
6079979	Riitano	Jun 2000	A
6122300	Freiberg et al.	Sep 2000	A
6129721	Kataoka et al.	Oct 2000	A
6139319	Sauer et al.	Oct 2000	A
6143011	Hood et al.	Nov 2000	A
D435651	Hartwein	Dec 2000	S
6159006	Cook et al.	Dec 2000	A
6162052	Kokubu	Dec 2000	A
6162177	Bab et al.	Dec 2000	A
6162202	Sicurelli et al.	Dec 2000	A
6164966	Turdiu et al.	Dec 2000	A
6179617	Ruddle	Jan 2001	B1
6190318	Bab et al.	Feb 2001	B1
6221031	Heraud	Apr 2001	B1
6224378	Valdes	May 2001	B1
6227855	Hickok et al.	May 2001	B1
6245032	Sauer et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6282013	Ostler et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6288499	Rizoiu et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6290502	Hugo	Sep 2001	B1
6312440	Hood et al.	Nov 2001	B1
6315557	Messick	Nov 2001	B1
6343929	Fischer	Feb 2002	B1
6386871	Rossell	May 2002	B1
6390815	Pond	May 2002	B1
6428319	Lopez et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6440103	Hood et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6454566	Lynch et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6464498	Pond	Oct 2002	B1
6485304	Beerstecher et al.	Nov 2002	B2
6497572	Hood	Dec 2002	B2
6511493	Moutafis et al.	Jan 2003	B1
6514077	Wilk	Feb 2003	B1
6527766	Bair	Mar 2003	B1
6538739	Visuri et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6562050	Owen	May 2003	B1
6572709	Kaneda et al.	Jun 2003	B1
6602074	Suh et al.	Aug 2003	B1
6616447	Rizoiu et al.	Sep 2003	B1
6638219	Asch et al.	Oct 2003	B1
6641394	Garman	Nov 2003	B2
6663386	Moelsgaard	Dec 2003	B1
6676409	Grant	Jan 2004	B2
6783364	Juan	Aug 2004	B1
6817862	Hickok	Nov 2004	B2
6821272	Rizoiu et al.	Nov 2004	B2
D499486	Kuhn et al.	Dec 2004	S
6827766	Carnes et al.	Dec 2004	B2
6881061	Fisher	Apr 2005	B2
6910887	Van Den Houdt	Jun 2005	B2
6948935	Nusstein	Sep 2005	B2
6971878	Pond	Dec 2005	B2
6976844	Hickok et al.	Dec 2005	B2
6981869	Ruddle	Jan 2006	B2
6997714	Schoeffel	Feb 2006	B1
7011521	Sierro et al.	Mar 2006	B2
7011644	Andrew et al.	Mar 2006	B1
7014465	Marais	Mar 2006	B1
7044737	Fu	May 2006	B2
7090497	Harris	Aug 2006	B1
7108693	Rizoiu et al.	Sep 2006	B2
7115100	McRury et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7147468	Snyder et al.	Dec 2006	B2
7163400	Cozean et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7238342	Torabinejad et al.	Jul 2007	B2
7261561	Ruddle et al.	Aug 2007	B2
7269306	Koeneman et al.	Sep 2007	B1
7270544	Schemmer et al.	Sep 2007	B2
7288086	Andriasyan	Oct 2007	B1
7296318	Mourad et al.	Nov 2007	B2
7306459	Williams et al.	Dec 2007	B1
7306577	Lemoine et al.	Dec 2007	B2
7326054	Todd et al.	Feb 2008	B2
7356225	Loebel	Apr 2008	B2
7384419	Jones et al.	Jun 2008	B2
7415050	Rizoiu et al.	Aug 2008	B2
7421186	Boutoussov et al.	Sep 2008	B2
7445618	Eggers et al.	Nov 2008	B2
7470124	Bornstein	Dec 2008	B2
7485116	Cao	Feb 2009	B2
7549861	Ruddle et al.	Jun 2009	B2
7620290	Rizoiu et al.	Nov 2009	B2
7621745	Bornstein	Nov 2009	B2
7630420	Boutoussov	Dec 2009	B2
7641668	Perry et al.	Jan 2010	B2
7670141	Thomas et al.	Mar 2010	B2
7695469	Boutoussov et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7696466	Rizoiu et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7702196	Boutoussov et al.	Apr 2010	B2
7748979	Nahlieli	Jul 2010	B2
7778306	Marincek et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7815630	Rizoiu et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7817687	Rizoiu et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7833016	Gharib et al.	Nov 2010	B2
7845944	DiGasbarro	Dec 2010	B2
7867224	Lukac et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7901373	Tavger	Mar 2011	B2
7909817	Griffin et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7916282	Duineveld et al.	Mar 2011	B2
7959441	Glover et al.	Jun 2011	B2
7970027	Rizoiu et al.	Jun 2011	B2
7970030	Rizoiu et al.	Jun 2011	B2
7980854	Glover et al.	Jul 2011	B2
7980923	Olmo et al.	Jul 2011	B2
8002544	Rizoiu et al.	Aug 2011	B2
8011923	Lukac et al.	Sep 2011	B2
8033825	Rizoiu et al.	Oct 2011	B2
8037566	Grez	Oct 2011	B2
8047841	Jefferies	Nov 2011	B2
8128401	Ruddle et al.	Mar 2012	B2
8152797	Boutoussov et al.	Apr 2012	B2
8204612	Feine et al.	Jun 2012	B2
8235719	Ruddle et al.	Aug 2012	B2
8295025	Edel et al.	Oct 2012	B2
8298215	Zinn	Oct 2012	B2
8317514	Weill	Nov 2012	B2
8322910	Gansmuller et al.	Dec 2012	B2
8328552	Ruddle	Dec 2012	B2
8388345	Ruddle	Mar 2013	B2
8419719	Rizoiu et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8439676	Florman	May 2013	B2
8506293	Pond	Aug 2013	B2
8617090	Fougere et al.	Dec 2013	B2
D699180	Sweere et al.	Feb 2014	S
8672678	Gramann et al.	Mar 2014	B2
8684956	McDonough et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8709057	Tettamanti et al.	Apr 2014	B2
8740957	Masotti	Jun 2014	B2
8747005	Kemp et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8753121	Gharib	Jun 2014	B2
8758010	Yamanaka et al.	Jun 2014	B2
8801316	Abedini	Aug 2014	B1
8834457	Cao	Sep 2014	B2
8977085	Walsh et al.	Mar 2015	B2
D726324	Duncan et al.	Apr 2015	S
9022959	Fusi, II et al.	May 2015	B2
9022961	Fougere et al.	May 2015	B2
9025625	Skrabelj et al.	May 2015	B2
9050157	Boyd et al.	Jun 2015	B2
9101377	Boutoussov et al.	Aug 2015	B2
9186222	Marincek et al.	Nov 2015	B2
D745966	Piorek et al.	Dec 2015	S
9216073	McDonough et al.	Dec 2015	B2
9308326	Hunter et al.	Apr 2016	B2
9333060	Hunter	May 2016	B2
9341184	Dion et al.	May 2016	B2
9492244	Bergheim et al.	Nov 2016	B2
9504536	Bergheim et al.	Nov 2016	B2
9572632	Lukac et al.	Feb 2017	B2
9579174	Yamamoto et al.	Feb 2017	B2
9610125	Kazic et al.	Apr 2017	B2
9700382	Pond et al.	Jul 2017	B2
9700384	Yamamoto et al.	Jul 2017	B2
9713511	Lifshitz	Jul 2017	B2
9788899	Sivriver et al.	Oct 2017	B2
9820827	Feine et al.	Nov 2017	B2
9820834	Maxwell et al.	Nov 2017	B2
9872748	Schoeffel	Jan 2018	B2
9877801	Khakpour et al.	Jan 2018	B2
9931187	Fregoso et al.	Apr 2018	B2
9987200	Kishen	Jun 2018	B2
10010388	Gharib et al.	Jul 2018	B2
10016263	Gharib et al.	Jul 2018	B2
10039625	Gharib et al.	Aug 2018	B2
10098708	Pond	Oct 2018	B2
10098717	Bergheim et al.	Oct 2018	B2
10363120	Khakpour et al.	Jul 2019	B2
20010041324	Riitano	Nov 2001	A1
20020012897	Tingley et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020072032	Senn et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020086264	Okawa et al.	Jul 2002	A1
20020090594	Riitano et al.	Jul 2002	A1
20020108614	Schultz	Aug 2002	A1
20020183728	Rosenberg et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20030013064	Zirkel	Jan 2003	A1
20030096213	Hickok et al.	May 2003	A1
20030121532	Coughlin et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030124485	Teraushi	Jul 2003	A1
20030191429	Andrew et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030207231	Nance	Nov 2003	A1
20030207232	Todd et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030236517	Appling	Dec 2003	A1
20040038170	Hiszowicz et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040048226	Garman	Mar 2004	A1
20040063074	Fisher	Apr 2004	A1
20040072122	Hegemann	Apr 2004	A1
20040073374	Lockhart et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040101809	Weiss et al.	May 2004	A1
20040126732	Nusstein	Jul 2004	A1
20040127892	Harris	Jul 2004	A1
20040193236	Altshuler	Sep 2004	A1
20040210276	Altshuler et al.	Oct 2004	A1
20040224288	Bornstein	Nov 2004	A1
20040259053	Bekov et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050064371	Soukos et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050096529	Cooper et al.	May 2005	A1
20050136375	Sicurelli, Jr. et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050155622	Leis	Jul 2005	A1
20050170312	Pond	Aug 2005	A1
20050199261	Vanhauwemeiren et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050277898	Dimalanta et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20050281530	Rizoiu et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060019220	Loebel et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060021642	Sliwa et al.	Feb 2006	A1
20060036172	Abe	Feb 2006	A1
20060064037	Shalon et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060184071	Klopotek	Aug 2006	A1
20060189965	Litvak et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060234182	Ruddle et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060234183	Ruddle et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060240386	Yaniv et al.	Oct 2006	A1
20060246395	Pond	Nov 2006	A1
20060257819	Johnson	Nov 2006	A1
20060264808	Staid et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20070009449	Kanca	Jan 2007	A1
20070016177	Vaynberg et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070016178	Vaynberg et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070020576	Osborn et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070042316	Pichat et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070049911	Brown	Mar 2007	A1
20070072153	Gross et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070083120	Cain et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070148615	Pond	Jun 2007	A1
20070175502	Sliwa	Aug 2007	A1
20070179486	Welch et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070265605	Vaynberg et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070287125	Weill	Dec 2007	A1
20080014545	Schippers	Jan 2008	A1
20080032259	Schoeffel	Feb 2008	A1
20080044789	Johnson	Feb 2008	A1
20080050702	Glover et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080070195	DiVito et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080085490	Jabri	Apr 2008	A1
20080138761	Pond	Jun 2008	A1
20080138772	Bornstein	Jun 2008	A1
20080155770	Grez	Jul 2008	A1
20080159345	Bornstein	Jul 2008	A1
20080160479	Ruddle et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080160480	Ruddle et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080188848	Deutmeyer et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080199831	Teichert et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080209650	Brewer et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080255498	Houle	Oct 2008	A1
20080285600	Marincek et al.	Nov 2008	A1
20090004621	Quan et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090011380	Wang	Jan 2009	A1
20090042171	Rizoiu et al.	Feb 2009	A1
20090047624	Tsai	Feb 2009	A1
20090047634	Calvert	Feb 2009	A1
20090054881	Krespi	Feb 2009	A1
20090059994	Nemes et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090092947	Cao et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090111068	Martinez	Apr 2009	A1
20090111069	Wagner	Apr 2009	A1
20090130622	Bollinger et al.	May 2009	A1
20090208898	Kaplan	Aug 2009	A1
20090211042	Bock	Aug 2009	A1
20090220908	Divito et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090227185	Summers et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090263759	Van Herpern	Oct 2009	A1
20100042040	Arentz	Feb 2010	A1
20100047734	Harris et al.	Feb 2010	A1
20100143861	Gharib	Jun 2010	A1
20100152634	Dove	Jun 2010	A1
20100160838	Krespi	Jun 2010	A1
20100160904	McMillan et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100209867	Becker et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100229316	Hohlbein et al.	Sep 2010	A1
20100273125	Janssen et al.	Oct 2010	A1
20100279250	Pond et al.	Nov 2010	A1
20100330539	Glover et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110027746	McDonough et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110027747	Fougere et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110070552	Bornstein	Mar 2011	A1
20110072605	Steur	Mar 2011	A1
20110087605	Pond	Apr 2011	A1
20110111365	Gharib et al.	May 2011	A1
20110117517	Bergheim et al.	May 2011	A1
20110143310	Hunter	Jun 2011	A1
20110198370	Ho	Aug 2011	A1
20110229845	Chen	Sep 2011	A1
20110256503	Fraser	Oct 2011	A1
20110269099	Glover et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110270241	Boutoussov	Nov 2011	A1
20120135373	Cheng et al.	May 2012	A1
20120141953	Mueller	Jun 2012	A1
20120237893	Bergheim	Sep 2012	A1
20120276497	Gharib	Nov 2012	A1
20120282570	Mueller	Nov 2012	A1
20120021375	Binner et al.	Dec 2012	A1
20130040267	Bergheim	Feb 2013	A1
20130084544	Boutoussov et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130084545	Netchitailo et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130085486	Boutoussov et al.	Apr 2013	A1
20130131656	Marincek et al.	May 2013	A1
20130143180	Glover et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20130177865	Ostler	Jul 2013	A1
20130190738	Lukac et al.	Jul 2013	A1
20130216980	Boronkay et al.	Aug 2013	A1
20130236857	Boutoussov et al.	Sep 2013	A1
20130288195	Mueller	Oct 2013	A1
20130296910	Deng	Nov 2013	A1
20130330684	Dillon et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20130337404	Feine	Dec 2013	A1
20140032183	Fisker et al.	Jan 2014	A1
20140072931	Fougere et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140080090	Laufer	Mar 2014	A1
20140087333	DiVito et al.	Mar 2014	A1
20140099597	Bergheim	Apr 2014	A1
20140113243	Boutoussov et al.	Apr 2014	A1
20140124969	Blaisdell et al.	May 2014	A1
20140127641	Hilscher et al.	May 2014	A1
20140170588	Miller et al.	Jun 2014	A1
20140205965	Boutoussov et al.	Jul 2014	A1
20140220505	Khakpour	Aug 2014	A1
20140220511	DiVito et al.	Aug 2014	A1
20140242551	Downs	Aug 2014	A1
20140261534	Schepis	Sep 2014	A1
20140272782	Luettgen et al.	Sep 2014	A1
20140342303	Altshuler et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20140349246	Johnson et al.	Nov 2014	A1
20150010878	Seibel et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150010882	Bergheim	Jan 2015	A1
20150017599	Marincek et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150017607	Nelson et al.	Jan 2015	A1
20150044631	Lifshitz et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150044632	Bergheim et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150056567	Fregoso et al.	Feb 2015	A1
20150056570	Kansal	Feb 2015	A1
20150125811	Lifshitz et al.	May 2015	A1
20150132712	Gharib	May 2015	A1
20150140503	Bergheim et al.	May 2015	A1
20150147715	Breysse	May 2015	A1
20150147717	Taylor et al.	May 2015	A1
20150147718	Khakpour	May 2015	A1
20150150650	Netchitailo et al.	Jun 2015	A1
20150173850	Garrigues et al.	Jun 2015	A1
20150173852	Khakpour	Jun 2015	A1
20150190597	Zachar et al.	Jul 2015	A1
20150216398	Yang et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150216597	Boutoussov et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150230865	Sivriver et al.	Aug 2015	A1
20150268803	Patton et al.	Sep 2015	A1
20150277738	Boutoussov et al.	Oct 2015	A1
20150283277	Schafer et al.	Oct 2015	A1
20150327964	Bock	Nov 2015	A1
20150335410	Zhao	Nov 2015	A1
20150366634	Gharib	Dec 2015	A1
20150367142	Kazic et al.	Dec 2015	A1
20150374471	Stangel et al.	Dec 2015	A1
20160022392	Chang et al.	Jan 2016	A1
20160067149	Kishen	Mar 2016	A1
20160095679	Khakpour	Apr 2016	A1
20160100921	Ungar	Apr 2016	A1
20160113733	Pond et al.	Apr 2016	A1
20160128815	Birdee et al.	May 2016	A1
20160135581	Pai	May 2016	A1
20160149370	Marincek et al.	May 2016	A1
20160149372	Marincek et al.	May 2016	A1
20160324600	Gharib	Nov 2016	A1
20160367346	Gharib	Dec 2016	A1
20170027646	DivVito et al.	Feb 2017	A1
20170036253	Lukac et al.	Feb 2017	A1
20170056143	Hyun	Mar 2017	A1
20170196658	Schoeffel	Jul 2017	A1
20170216579	Becker et al.	Aug 2017	A1
20170273758	Bergheim	Sep 2017	A1
20170281305	Bergheim	Oct 2017	A1
20170281312	Khakpour	Oct 2017	A1
20170300220	Boutoussov et al.	Oct 2017	A1
20170325889	DiVito et al.	Nov 2017	A1
20180116761	Bergheim	May 2018	A1
20180214247	Sharma et al.	Aug 2018	A1
20180360563	Khakpour	Dec 2018	A1
20190183618	Bergheim	Jun 2019	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (110)

Number	Date	Country
2012-202315	Apr 2012	AU
2007140780	May 2014	AU
2011316839	Aug 2015	AU
102724929	Oct 2012	CN
103027762	Apr 2013	CN
103347462	Oct 2013	CN
104470464	Mar 2015	CN
37 08 801	Sep 1988	DE
102 48 336	May 2004	DE
103 31 583	Jul 2004	DE
0 261 466	Mar 1988	EP
0 830 852	Mar 1998	EP
1 214 916	Jun 2002	EP
0 902 654	Aug 2004	EP
1 723 924	Nov 2006	EP
2 498 713	Sep 2012	EP
2 821 027	Jan 2015	EP
2 836 156	Feb 2015	EP
2 836 157	Feb 2015	EP
2 934 364	Oct 2015	EP
2 951 019	Dec 2015	EP
2 959 861	Dec 2015	EP
3 013 277	May 2016	EP
3 184 038	Jun 2017	EP
3 231 385	Oct 2017	EP
3 384 870	Oct 2018	EP
1 225 547	Jul 1960	FR
2 831 050	Oct 2001	FR
917 633	Feb 1963	GB
1 188 108	Apr 2014	HK
219169	Apr 2013	IL
51-064791	Apr 1976	JP
09-276292	Oct 1997	JP
10-33548	Feb 1998	JP
11-113927	Apr 1999	JP
11-244303	Sep 1999	JP
2000-254153	Sep 2000	JP
2002-191619	Jul 2002	JP
2002-209911	Jul 2002	JP
2004-313659	Nov 2003	JP
3535685	Jun 2004	JP
2004-261288	Sep 2004	JP
2004-267756	Sep 2004	JP
2005-095374	Apr 2005	JP
2007-533333	Nov 2007	JP
2008-93080	Apr 2008	JP
2008-132099	Jun 2008	JP
2009-114953	May 2009	JP
2013-510688	Mar 2013	JP
2013-544120	Dec 2013	JP
2015-510829	Apr 2015	JP
10-2008-0105713	Dec 2008	KR
10-2012-0084897	Jul 2012	KR
2013-0022553	Mar 2013	KR
10-2013-0141103	Dec 2013	KR
2004-72508	May 2014	KR
2326611	Dec 2011	RU
M 336 027	Jul 2008	TW
WO 1992004871	Apr 1992	WO
WO 199212685	Aug 1992	WO
WO 1998025536	Jun 1995	WO
WO 1995035069	Dec 1995	WO
WO 199612447	May 1996	WO
WO 1997021420	Jun 1997	WO
WO 1998023219	Jun 1998	WO
WO 2000045731	Aug 2000	WO
WO 200074587	Dec 2000	WO
WO 2001026577	Apr 2001	WO
WO 200126735	Apr 2001	WO
WO 200193773	Dec 2001	WO
WO 2002078644	Oct 2002	WO
WO 2003086223	Oct 2003	WO
WO 2004034923	Apr 2004	WO
WO 2004082501	Sep 2004	WO
WO 2005007008	Jan 2005	WO
WO 2005032393	Apr 2005	WO
WO 2005034790	Apr 2005	WO
WO 2005102033	Nov 2005	WO
WO 2006082101	Aug 2006	WO
WO 2007007335	Jan 2007	WO
WO 2007007336	Jan 2007	WO
WO 2007124038	Nov 2007	WO
WO 2008001337	Jan 2008	WO
WO 2008024442	Feb 2008	WO
WO 2008092125	Jul 2008	WO
WO 2008120018	Oct 2008	WO
WO 2009036963	Mar 2009	WO
WO 2009047670	Apr 2009	WO
WO 2009064947	May 2009	WO
WO 2009137815	Nov 2009	WO
WO 2010007257	Jan 2010	WO
WO 2010099538	Sep 2010	WO
WO 2011060327	May 2011	WO
WO 2011077291	Jun 2011	WO
WO 2011114718	Sep 2011	WO
WO 2011136798	Nov 2011	WO
WO 2012054905	Apr 2012	WO
WO 2012074918	Jun 2012	WO
WO 201315700	Jan 2013	WO
WO 2013061251	May 2013	WO
WO 2013142385	Sep 2013	WO
WO 2013155492	Oct 2013	WO
WO 2013160888	Oct 2013	WO
WO 2014100751	Jun 2014	WO
WO 2014121293	Aug 2014	WO
WO 2015168329	Nov 2015	WO
WO 2016005221	Jan 2016	WO
WO 2017162705	Sep 2017	WO
WO 2017162706	Sep 2017	WO
WO 2019055569	Mar 2019	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (156)

Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 61/701,947, filed Sep. 17, 2012, Laufer.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/894.762, filed Oct. 23, 2013, Lifshitz et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/895,316, filed Oct. 24, 2013, Lifshitz et al.
Ebihara et al.: “Er:YAG laser modification of root canal dentine: Influence of pulse duration, repetitive irradiation and water spray,” Lasers in Medical Science, 17(3), 198-207, Aug. 2002.
European Extended Search Report, re EP Application No. 11835265.7, dated Mar. 30, 2016, in 9 pages.
European Extended Search Report, re EP Application No. 13763534.8, dated Jan. 15, 2016.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/044186, dated Dec. 29, 2015, in 19 pages.
Nammour et al.: “External temperature during KTP-nd:YAG laser irradiation in root canals: An in vitro study,” Lasers in Medical Science, 19(1), 27-32, Jul. 2004.
Ulrich Schoop et al.: “The use of the erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser in endodontic treatment: The results of an in vitro study,” The Journal of the American Dental Association: vol. 138, Issue 7, Jul. 2007, pp. 949-955.
Wohlemuth et al.: “Effectiveness of GentleWave System in Removing Separated Instruments,” JOE, vol. 41, No. 11, Nov. 2015.
Adachi et al; Jet Structure Analyses on High-Speed Submerged Water Jets through Cavitation 110 Noises; pp. 568-574; The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers International Journal—Series B, vol. 39, No. 3; Nov. 1996.
Al-Jadaa et al; Acoustic Hypochlorite Activation in Simulated Curved Canals; pp. 1408-1411; Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, No. 10; Oct. 2009.
Anand et al; Prevention of Nozzle Wear in High-Speed Slurry Jets Using Porous Lubricated Nozzles; pp. 1-13; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Oct. 2000.
Anantharamaiah et al; A simple expression for predicting the inlet roundness of micro-nozzles; pp. N31-N39; Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 17; Mar. 21, 2007.
Anantharamaiah et al; A study on flow through hydroentangling nozzles and their degradation; pp. 4582-4594; Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 61; May 2006.
Anantharamaiah et al; Numerical Simulation of the Formation of Constricted Waterjets in Hydroentangling Nozzles Effects of Nozzle Geometry; pp. 31-238; Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 84; Mar. 2006.
Attin et al; Clinical evaluation of the cleansing properties of the nonistrumental technique for cleaning root canals; pp. 929-933; International Endodontic Journal, vol. 35, Issue 11; Nov. 2002.
Batchelor et al; Analysis of the stability of axisymmetric jets; pp. 529-551; Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 14; Dec. 1962.
Begenir et al; Effect of Nozzle Geometry on Hydroentangling Water Jets: Experimental Observations; pp. 178-184; Textile Research Journal, vol. 74; Feb. 2004.
Begenir, Asli; The Role of Orifice Design in Hydroentanglement; Thesis submitted to North Carolina State University; dated Dec. 2002, in 107 pages.
Borkent et al; Is there gas entrapped on submerged silicon wafers? Visualizing nano-scale bubbles with cavitation; pp. 225-228; Solid State Phenomena, vol. 134 (2008); available online Nov. 2007.
Bremond et al; Cavitation on surfaces; pp. S3603-S3608; Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 17; Oct. 28, 2005.
Brennen, Christopher E.; Fission of collapsing cavitation bubbles; pp. 153-166; Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 472; Dec. 2002.
Chang et al; Effects of Inlet Surface Roughness, Texture, and Nozzle Material on Cavitation; pp. 299-317; Atomization and Sprays, vol. 16 (2006).
Culjat et al., “B-Scan Imaging of Human Teeth Using Ultrasound,” Apr. 2003, in 4 pages.
Didenkulov et al; Nonlinear Acoustic Diagnostics of Scatterer Spatial Distribution in a Cavitation Jet; Nov. 19-23, 2001, pp. 276-278, XI Session of the Russion Acoustical Society.
Dumouchel, Christophe; On the experimental investigation on primary atomization of liquid streams; pp. 371-422; Experimental Fluids, vol. 45; Jun. 22, 2008.
Eddingfield et al; Mathematical Modeling of High Velocity Water Jets; pp. 25-39; Proceedings of 1st U.S. Water Jet Conference; 1981.
EMS Electro Medical Systems, “Cleaning”, in 2 pages, dated 2005, downloaded from http://www.ems-dent.com/en/endodontics cleaning. htm.
ESI Endo Soft Instruments, EMS Electro Medical Systems, Brochure in 2 pages, downloaded from www.emsdent.com, dated Jan. 2004.
European Exam Report, dated Jun. 11, 2015, for EP Application No. 07755777.5, in 6 pages.
European Extended Search Report re EP Application No. 09743801.4, dated Jun. 4, 2012.
European Extended Search Report re EP Application No. 14187012.1, dated Mar. 3, 2015, in 10 pages.
European Extended Search Report, dated Sep. 22, 2011, for EP Application No. 07755777.5, in 7 pages.
European Extended Search Report, re EP Application No. 08728345.3, dated Mar. 3, 2014.
Feng et al; Enhancement of ultrasonic cavitation yield by multi-frequency sonication; pp. 231-236; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 9; Oct. 2002.
Flint, E. B., et al., “The Temperature of Cavitation”, Science, vol. 253, Sep. 20, 1991, pp. 1397-1399.
Foldyna et al; Acoustic wave propagation in high-pressure system; pp. e1457-e1460; Ultrasonics vol. 44 (Supplement 1); Jun. 8, 2006.
Fuchs, “Ultrasonic Cleaning: Fundamental Theory and Application,” Blackstone-Ney Ultrasonics, Jamestown, NY, May 2002.
G.E. Reisman and C.E. Brennen, “Pressure Pulses Generated by Cloud Cavitation”, FED-vol. 236, 1996 Fluids Engineering Division Conference, vol. 1, pp. 319-328, ASME 1996.
G.E. Reisman, Y.-C. Wang and C.E. Brennen, “Observations of shock waves in cloud cavitation”, J. Fluid Mech. (1998), vol. 355, pp. 255-283.
Ghassemieh et al; Effect of Nozzle Geometry on the Flow Characteristics of Hydroentangling Jets; pp. 444-450; Textile Research Journal, vol. 73; May 2003.
Ghassemieh et al; The effect of nozzle geometry on the flow characteristics of small water jets; pp. 1739-1753; Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 12, Sep. 2006.
Hahn et al; Acoustic resonances in the bubble plume formed by a plunging water jet; pp. 1751-1782; Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 459; May 16, 2003.
Hashish, Mohamed; Experimental Studies of Cutting with Abrasive Waterjets; pp. 402-416; Proceedings of 2nd American Water Jet Conference; 1983.
Herbert et al; Cavitation pressure in water; pp. 041603-1 to 041603-22; Physical Review E, vol. 74; Oct. 2006.
Hiroyasu, Hiro; Spray Breakup Mechanism from the Hole-Type Nozzle and its Applications; pp. 511-527; Atomization and Sprays, vol. 10 (2000).
Hmud R. et al. “Cavitational Effects in Aqueous Endodontic Irrigants Generated by Near-Infrared Lasers”, Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, Issue 2, Feb. 2010, available online Dec. 4, 2009, in 4 pages.
Hoque et al; Air entrainment and associated energy dissipation in steady and unsteady plunging jets at free surface; pp. 37-45; Applied Ocean Research, vol. 30; May 2008.
Hydrocision Products: SpineJet Hydrosurgery; system webpage in 2 pages, copyright 2010, downloaded from http://www.hydrocision.com on Apr. 22, 2010.
Hydrocision SpineJet XL HydroSurgery System; Brochure in 2 pages, copyright 2004-2006, downloaded from http://www.hydrocision.com on Apr. 22, 2010.
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 9, 2010 for International Appl. No. PCT/US09/43386, in 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 14, 2014, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/036493, in 14 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 6, 2009, for International Appl. No. PCT/US08/52122, in 13 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 30, 2008, for International Appl. No. PCT/US07/09633, in 5 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability re App. No. PCT/US2010/056620, dated May 15, 2012, in 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability re PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/014732, dated Aug. 4, 2015.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, re PCT Application No. PCT/US11/57401, dated Jan. 25, 2013 in 13 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/077286, dated Jun. 23, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 11, 2008, for International Appl. No. PCT/US07/09633, in 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 8, 2008, for International Appl. No. PCT/US08/52122, in 18 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 29, 2009, for International Appl. No. PCT/US09/43386, in 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2011/057401, dated Jan. 30, 2012, in 20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 28, 2013, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/036493, in 21 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion re App. No. PCT/US2010/056620, dated Jan. 12, 2011, in 17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion re App. No. PCT/US2014/014732, dated Jul. 18, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US 13/32635, dated Jun. 17, 2013 in 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/077286, dated May 27, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/036451, dated Jan. 21, 2015, in 20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/044186, dated Jan. 21, 2015, in 19 pages.
Jackson et al; Nozzle Design for Coherent Water Jet Production; pp. 53-89; Proceeding of the 2nd US Water Jet Conference; May 1983.
Junge et al; Cell Detachment Method Using Shock-Wave-Induced Cavitation; pp. 1769-1776; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 29, No. 12; Dec. 2003.
Kalumuck et al; Development of High Erosivity Well Scale Cleaning Tools; pp. 1-36; Dynaflow, Inc.; Report 98012 conducted under Contract No. DE-FG07-981013684 for the US Dept. of Energy; Jul. 1999, in 36 pages.
Karasawa et al; Effect of Nozzle Configuration on the Atomization of a Steady Spray; pp. 411-426; Atomization and Sprays, vol. 2 (1992).
Kato, Hiroharu; Utilization of Cavitation for Environmental Protection—Killing Planktons and Dispersing Spilled Oil; pp. 1-8; In CAV2001: Fourth International Symposium on Caviation; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA; dated Jun. 2001.
Lee et al; The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals; pp. 607-612; International Endodontic Journal, vol. 37; May 2004.
Li et al; Cavitation Resonance; pp. 031302-1 to 031302-7; Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 130; Mar. 2008.
Lienhard V et al; Velocity Coefficients for Free Jets From Sharp-Edged Orifices; pp. 13-17; Reprinted from Mar. 1984, vol. 106, Journal of Fluids Engineering.
Lin et al; Drop and Spray Formation from a Liquid Jet; pp. 85-105; Jan. 1998: vol. 30; Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.
Linfield, Kevin William; A Study of the Discharge Coefficient of Jets From Angled Slots and Conical Orifices; Thesis submitted to Dept. of Aerospace Science and Engineering; University of Toronto; dated 2000; in 148 pages.
Lussi et al; A new non-instrumental technique for cleaning and filling root canals; pp. 1-6; International Endodontic Journal, vol. 28; Jan. 1995.
Lussi et al; A Novel Noninstrumented Technique for Cleansing the Root Canal System; pp. 549-553; Journal of Endodontics, vol. 19, No. 11; Nov. 1993.
Lussi et al; In vivo performance of the new non-instrumentation technology (NIT) for root canal obturation; pp. 352-358; International Endodontic Journal, vol. 35; Apr. 2002.
Maximum Dental Inc ., “Canal Clean Max”, “Intra Canal Irrigation and Aspiration Device”, and “SonicMax, Endo-Perio Sonic Handpiece”, in 3 pages, downloaded from www.dentalmaximum.com on May 8, 2008.
Ohrn et al; Geometric Effects on Spray Cone Angle for Plain-Orifice Atomizers; pp. 253-268; Atomization and Sprays, vol. 1 (1991).
Ohrn et al; Geometrical Effects on Discharge Coefficients for Plain-Orifice Atomizers; pp. 137-153; Atomization and Sprays, vol. 1, No. 2 (1991).
Phinney, Ralph E.; The breakup of a turbulent liquid jet in a gaseous atmosphere; pp. 689-701; J. Fluid Mechanics, vol. 60, Part 4; Oct. 1973.
Piezon Master 600 Ultrasound a la carte, EMS Electro Medical Systems, EMS SA FA-319.EN ed. Mar. 2009; Brochure dated Mar. 2009, in 2 pages.
Quinn, W. R.; Experimental study of the near field and transition region of a free jet issuing from a sharp-edged elliptic orifice plate; pp. 583-614; European Journal of Mechanics—B/Fluids, vol. 26; Jul.-Aug. 2007; available online Dec. 2006.
Ramamurthi et al; Disintegration of Liquid Jets from Sharp-Edged Nozzles; pp. 551-564; Atomization and Sprays, vol. 4 (1994).
Reitz et al; Mechanism of atomization of a liquid jet; pp. 1730-1742; Physics Fluids, vol. 25, No. 10; Oct. 1982.
Sabeti, “Healing of apical periodontitis after endodontic treatment with and without obturation in dogs,” Journal of Endodontics, Jul. 2006, pp. 628-633.
Sallam et al; Liquid breakup at the surface of turbulent round liquid jets in still gases; pp. 427-449; International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 28; Mar. 2002.
Sawant et al; Effect of hydrodynamic cavitation on zooplankton: A tool for disinfection; pp. 320-328; Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 42, Issue 3; Dec. 2008.
Shi et al; Comparison-speed liquid jets; Experiments in Fluids, vol. 35; pp. 486-492; Oct. 7, 2003.
Sou et al; Effects of cavitation in a nozzle on liquid jet atomization; pp. 3575-3582; International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 50; Mar. 2007.
Soyama et al; High-Speed Observation of Ultrahigh-Speed Submerged Water Jets; pp. 411-416; Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 12 1996).
Soyama, Hitoshi; High-Speed Observation of a Cavitating Jet in Air; Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 127; pp. 1095-1101; Nov. 2005.
Summers, David A; Considerations in the Comparison of Cavitating and Plain Water Jets; pp. 178-184; Rock Mechanics and Explosive Research Center, Rolla, Missouri, 1983.
Summers, David A; The Volume Factor in Cavitation Erosion; Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Erosion by Liquid and Solid Impact; University of Missouri-Rolla; Rolla, Missouri, 1983, in 12 pages.
Suslick, K. S., et al., “The Sonochemical Hot Spot”, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 108, No. 18, Sep. 3, 1986, pp. 5641-5642.
Suslick, K. S., et al., “Heterogeneous Sonocatalysis with Nickel Powder”, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 109, No. 11, May 27, 1987, pp. 3459-3461.
Tafreshi et al; Simulating Cavitation and Hydraulic Flip Inside Hydroentangling Nozzles; pp. 359-364; Textile Research Journal, vol. 74, Apr. 2004.
Tafreshi et al; Simulating the Flow Dynamics in Hydroentangling Nozzles: Effect of Cone Angle and Nozzle Aspect Ratio; pp. 700-704; Textile Research Journal, vol. 73; Aug. 2003.
Tafreshi et al; The effects of nozzle geometry on waterjet breakup at high Reynolds numbers; pp. 364-371; Experiments in Fluids, vol. 35; Sep. 2, 2003.
Zuo et al; An Attribution of Cavitation Resonance: Volumetric Oscillations of Cloud; pp. 152-158; Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 21; Apr. 2009.
European Extended Search Report, re EP Application No. 10830829.7, dated Oct. 21, 2015.
European Extended Search Report, re EP Application No. 13775073.3, dated Nov. 3, 2015.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/036451, dated Nov. 3, 2015, 2015, in 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/028360, dated Sep. 28, 2015.
Ahmad et al., “Ultrasonic Debridement of Root Canals: Acoustic Cavitation and Its Relevance,” Journal of Endontics, vol. 14, No. 10, pp. 486-493, Oct. 1988.
DiVito et al.: “Cleaning and debriding efficacy of new radial and stripped tips using an Erbium laser on human root canal dentin walls—an in vitro study: SEM observations,” undated.
ADA American Dental Association, “Glossary of Dental Clinical and Administrative Terms,” http://www.ada.org/en/publications/cdt/glossary-of-dental-clinical-and-administrative-ter, downloaded May 4, 2017, in 46 pages.
Lukac et al.: “Photoacoustic Endodontics Using the Novel Sweeps Er:YAG Laser Modality,” Journal of the Laser and Health Academy, vol. 2017, No. 1; www.laserlaserandhealth.com.
Schoop et al., “The Impact of an Erbium, Chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser with radial-firing tips on endonic treatment,” Lasers in Medical Science, Springer-Verlag, LO. vol. 24, No. 1 Nov. 20, 2007.
Stamos et al., “Retreatodontics and ultrasonics”, Journal of Endodontics, vol. 14., No. 1, pp. 39-42, Jan. 1, 1988.
Stamos et al., “Use of ultrasonics in single-visit endodontic therapy,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 246-249, May 1, 1987.
Zehnder, “Root Canal Irrigants”, Journal of Endodontics, vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 389-398, May 2006.
Alomairy, Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study. J Endod 2009;35:559-62.
Bahia, et al.: Physical and mechanical characterization and the influence of cyclic loading on the behaviour of nickel-titanium wires employed in the manufacture of rotary endodontic instruments. Int Endod. J. 2005;38:795-801.
Charara, et al.: “Assessment of apical extrusion during root canal procedure with the novel GentleWave system in a simulated apical environment,” J Endod 2015. In Press.
Crump et al., “Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation,” J Am Dent Assoc 1970;80:1341-7.
D'Arcangelo, et al.: “Broken instrument removal—two cases,” J Endod 2000;26:368-70.
Esen, et al.: “Apical microleakage of root-end cavities prepared by CO2 laser,” J Endod 2004;30:662-4.
Feldman, et al.: “Retrieving broken endodontic instruments,” J Am Dent Assoc. 1974:88:588-91.
Fors, et al.: “A method for the removal of broken endodontic instruments from root canals,” J Endod 1983;9:156-9.
Gencoglu, et al.: Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems. Eur J Dent 2009;3:90-5.
Haapasalo, et al.: “Tissue dissolution by a novel multisonic ultra-cleaning system and sodium hypochlorite,” J Endod 2014;40:1178-81.
Haikel, et al.: Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1999;25:434-40.
Haikel, et al.: Dynamic fracture of hybrid endodontic hand instruments compared with traditional files. J Endod 1991;17:217-20.
Hulsmann, et al.: Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 199;15:252-8.
Hulsmann: “Methods for removing metal obstructions from the root canal,” Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;9:223-37.
Iqbal, et al.: “A comparison of three methods for preparing centered platforms around separated instruments in curved canals,” J Endod 2006;32:48-51.
Ma, et al.: “In vitro study of calcium hydroxide removal from mandibular molar root canals,” J Endod 2015;41:553-8.
Madarati, et al.: “Efficiency of a newly designed ultrasonic unit and tips in reducing temperature rise on root surface during the removal of fractured files,” J Endod 2009;35:896-9.
Madarati, et al.: “Management of intracanal separated instruments,” J Endod 2013;39:569-81.
Madarati, et al.: “Qualtrough AJ. Factors contributing to the separation of endodontic files,” Br Dent J 2008;204:241-5.
Molina, et al.: “Histological evaluation of root canal debridement of human molars using the GentleWaveTM system,” J Endod 2015;41:1702-5.
Nevares, et al.: “Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a prospective clinical study,” J Endod 2012;38:442-4.
Roth, et al.: “A study of the strength of endodonitc files: potential for torsional breakage and relative flexibility,” J Endod 1983; 9:228-32.
Ruddle, “Nonsurgical retreatment,” J Endod 2004;30:827-45.
Schneider, et al.: “A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals,” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-5.
Schneider, et al.: “NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis,” Nat Methods 2012;9:671-5.
Shen, et al.: “Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems,” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:605-10.
Skyttner, “Endodontic instrument separations: evaluation of a patient cases series with separated endodontic instruments and factors related to the treatment regarding separated instruments [thesis],” Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2007.
Souter, et al.: “Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique,” J Endod 2005;31:450-2.
Suter, et al.: “Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals,” Int Endod J 2005;38:112-23.
Terauchi, et al.: “Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems,” J. Endod 2007;33:585-8.
Ward Jr.: “The use of an ultrasonic technique to remove a fractured rotary nickel-titanium instrument from the apical third of a curved root canal,” Aust Endod J 2003;29:25-30.
Yoldas, et al.: “Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars,” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:513-7.
Yu et al.: “Study on removal effects of filling materials and broken files from root canals using pulsed Nd:YAG laser,” J Clin Laser Med Surg 2000;18:23-8.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/881,570, filed Jan. 26, 2018, Khakpour et al.
European Extended Search Report, dated Mar. 8, 2018, for EP Application No. 17201637.0.
Lumkes, Jr., Control Strategies for Dynamic Systems: Design and Implementation, 2002, pp. 117-118.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/366,954, filed Mar. 27, 2019, Gharib et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/412,919, filed May 15, 2019, Gharib et al.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20150366634 A1	Dec 2015	US

Provisional Applications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	60793452	Apr 2006	US

Continuations (2)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	14304737	Jun 2014	US
Child	14628500		US
Parent	11737710	Apr 2007	US
Child	14304737		US

Apparatus and methods for treating root canals of teeth

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Abstract