In unconsolidated formations, horizontal and deviated wells are routinely completed with completion systems having integrated sand screens. To control the flow-rate of produced fluids (such as to reduce tubular erosion due to abrasive sand entrained within the produced fluid) the sand screens may use inflow control devices (ICD) to slow fluid rate through the sand screening elements. One ICD example is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,393 to Brekke et al. Other examples of inflow control devices are also available, such as the FloReg™ ICD available from Weatherford International, the Equalizer® ICD available from Baker Hughes, ResFlow™ ICD available from Schlumberger, and the EquiFlow® ICD available from Halliburton. (EQUALIZER is a registered trademark of Baker Hughes Incorporated, and EQUIFLOW is a registered trademark of Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.)
For example, a completion system 10 in
Turning to
The joint 50 is deployed on a production string (14:
For its part, the sand control jacket 60 is disposed around the outside of the basepipe 52. As illustrated, the sand control jacket 60 can be a wire wrapped screen having rods or ribs 64 arranged longitudinally along the basepipe 52 with windings of wire 62 wrapped thereabout to form various slots. Fluid can pass from the surrounding borehole annulus to the annular gap between the sand control jacket 60 and the basepipe 52.
Internally, the inflow control device 70 has nozzles 82 disposed in the flow ports 80. The nozzles 82 restrict flow of screened fluid (i.e., inflow) from the screen jacket 60 to the device's inner space 86 to produce a pressure drop. For example, the inflow control device 70 may have ten nozzles 82, although they all may not be open. Operators may set a number of these nozzles 82 open at the surface to configure the device 70 for use downhole in a given implementation. Depending on the number of open nozzles 82, the device 70 can thereby produce a configurable pressure drop along the screen jacket 60.
To configure the device 70, pins 84 can be selectively placed in the passages of the nozzles 82 to close them off. The pins 84 are typically hammered in place with a tight interference fit and are removed by gripping the pin with a vice grip and hammering on the vice grip. These operations need to be performed off rig beforehand so that valuable rig time is not used up making such adjustments.
When the joints 50 are used in a horizontal or deviated borehole as illustrated in
Although the inflow control device 70 of the prior art and its arrangement on a completion screen joint 50 is often effective, the prior art completion screen joint 50 such as illustrated in
The more concentrated inflow through the jacket 60 near the device 70 also produces formation fluids less efficiently and can lead to issues with plugging and clogging. This unbalanced flow rate distribution can lead to screen erosion, tool plugging, and other associated problems. However, once a screen jacket 62 becomes compromised with erosional holes, the entirety of the screen becomes virtually useless for its intended purpose. Plugging can also be an issue at any point during operations and may even be problematic when the joint 50 is initially installed in the borehole. For example, the joint 50 may be initially lowered into an unconditioned mud, which can eventually plug the screen 60 and cause well performance and productivity to significantly decline.
Additionally, for vertical, horizontal, and deviated boreholes in an unconsolidated formation, it is beneficial to place stimulation fluids effectively to overcome any near borehole damage and screen plugging that may have developed. Accordingly, a cleanup operation may need to be performed by bullheading a treatment fluid into the well. In bullheading, operators fill a portion of the borehole with treatment fluid (such as an acid system) by pumping the fluid down the tubing string 14 and using fluid pressure to cause the stimulation fluid to flow out of the inflow control device 70 and screen 60, and into the surrounding borehole. Unfortunately, the treatment fluid may be disproportionately forced into the area of the formation near the inflow control device 70 and not into other regions of need. As a result, the concentrated flow and “overstimulation” can cause fluid loss and can over-treat certain areas compared to others. More even and controlled stimulation fluid placement is needed.
The subject matter of the present disclosure is, therefore directed to overcoming, or at least reducing the effects of, one or more of the problems set forth above.
A sand control apparatus for a wellbore completion string or system may include a basepipe with a bore for conveying the production fluid to the surface. To prevent sand and other particulate fines from passing through openings in the basepipe to the bore, first and second screens may be disposed on the basepipe for screening fluid produced from the surrounding borehole. Disposed on the basepipe between these first and second screens, an intermediately-mounted inflow control device is in fluid communication with screened fluid from both of the first and second screens. Screened fluid from both (or selectively either) of the two (first and second) screens passes to the ICD, from which the fluid can eventually pass to the basepipe's bore through the ICD opening.
In some embodiments, to control the flow of the fluid and create a desired pressure drop a flow device disposed with the ICD may control fluid communication of the screened fluid into the openings in the basepipe. In one implementation, the flow device includes one or more flow ports having nozzles or orifices. A number of the flow ports and nozzles may be provided to control fluid communication for a particular implementation and the nozzles can be configured to allow flow, restrict flow, or prevent flow by use of an adjustable apparatus or sizeable apparatus, such as an adjustable pin for example.
To configure the number of nozzles that will permit flow, a housing of the inflow control device may be removable from the basepipe so operators can gain access to the nozzles. For example, the housing can use a housing sleeve that can slide onto two, separated end-rings to enclose the housing chamber. One end of this housing sleeve can abut against a shoulder on one end-ring, while the housing sleeve's other end can be affixed to the other end-ring using lock wires or other fasteners. When the housing sleeve is removed, the nozzles can be configured either open or closed to produce a configurable pressure drop when deployed downhole.
In one implementation, the flow device may define a flow device chamber or annular region with respect to the basepipe. The device chamber is separate from a housing chamber of the inflow control device and fluidly communicates with the basepipe opening. One or more flow ports having nozzles in turn communicate the housing chamber with the device chamber. In this implementation, the flow device has a sleeve disposed in the inflow control device's housing next to the openings in the basepipe. Ends of the sleeve are attached to the basepipe and enclose the device chamber. The at least one flow port is defined in one of the ends of the sleeve and has the nozzle, which may preferably be composed of an erosion resistant material, such as tungsten carbide. Additionally, the at least one flow port may preferably axially align parallel to the axis of the basepipe.
During operation, screened fluid from the screens flows through passages in the end-rings of the inflow control device's housing that abut the inside ends of the screens. Once in the housing's chamber, the screened fluid then passes through the open nozzles in the flow ports, which then restrict fluid communication from the housing chamber to the device chamber and produce a configured pressure drop. Once in the device chamber, the fluid can communicate through the basepipe's openings to be conveyed uphole via the pipe's bore.
The foregoing summary is not intended to summarize each potential embodiment or every aspect of the present disclosure.
An exemplary well completion sand screen joint 100 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure are illustrated in
For this completion screen joint 100, an inflow control device 130 is intermediately mounted (positioned) on a basepipe 110 between two sand control jackets or screen sections 120A-B, with one of the two screens disposed toward each end of the ICD 130. The term “intermediate” as used herein merely means that the ICD 130 is axially positioned along the tool string 100 such that it receives fluid flow in a first direction from a first sand screen and in a second direction from a second sand screen. In most embodiments, the ICD 130 will receive flow from both the first and second sand screens substantially simultaneously. However, some embodiments may provide additional flow control components (not illustrated herein) that may provide for selectively closing off or controlling fluid flow from one or both of the first or second sand screens to the ICD 130.
The basepipe 110 generally defines a through-bore 115 for conveying produced fluid to the surface and comprises flow openings 118 for conducting produced fluid from outside the basepipe 110 into the through-bore 115. To connect the joint 100 to other components of a completion system, the basepipe 110 may include a coupling crossover 116 at one end, while the other end 114 may connect to a crossover (not illustrated) of another basepipe.
For their part, the sand control jackets 120A-B disposed around the outside of the basepipe 110 use any of the various types of screen assemblies known and used in the art. The two screen jackets 120A-B may be the same or different from one another so that the flow characteristics and the screening capabilities of the joint 100 can be selectively configured for a particular implementation. In general, the screen jackets 120A-B can comprise one or more layers, including wire wrappings, porous metal fiber, sintered laminate, pre-packed media, etc. The segments may also be equally or non-equally distally spaced from the ICD 130. As illustrated in
Other types of screen assemblies may be used for the jackets 120A-B, including metal mesh screens, pre-packed screens, protective shell screens, expandable sand screens, or screens of other construction. Overall, the sand control jackets 120A-B can offer the same length or surface area for screening the produced fluid in the borehole as is provided by the single screen of the prior art joint 50 detailed in
During production, fluid can pass from the formation or wellbore annulus into the sand control jackets 120A-B and pass along the annular gaps or channels between the sand control jacket 120A-B and the basepipe 110. Outside edges of the screen jackets 120A-B have closed end-rings 125, preventing fluid from bypassing the screens. In some embodiments, the tool assembly may include one ICD 130 and companion sets of screen jackets 120A-B, such as illustrated in
The inflow control device 130 is disposed on the basepipe 110 at the location of the flow openings 118 and between the two screen jackets 120A-B. As best illustrated in exemplary
In the illustrated example embodiment, both end-rings 140A-B have internal channels, slots, or passages 142 that can fit partially over the inside edges of the jackets 120A-B as illustrated in
A sand control apparatus for a wellbore completion string or system may include a basepipe with a bore 115 for conveying the production fluid to the surface. To prevent sand and other particulate fines from passing through openings in the basepipe to the bore, first and second screens may be disposed on the basepipe for screening fluid produced from the surrounding borehole. Disposed on the basepipe between these first and second screens, an intermediately-mounted inflow control device is in fluid communication with screened fluid from both of the first and second screens. This arrangement enables one ICD to regulate fluid from multiple screens or multiple screen tools. Alternatively, if one ICD becomes plugged, fails closed, or is not regulating flow properly, the produced fluid from one of the screen tools (of the first and second screens) can bypass the failed ICD and proceed into the annular area of the other sand screen tool (the other of the first or second screens) and proceed on to another ICD for properly regulated production rate. Thereby, no production is lost due to lost conductivity or failed production equipment. Screened fluid from both (or selectively either) of the two (first and second) screens passes to the ICD, from which the fluid can eventually pass to the basepipe's bore through the ICD opening.
As noted above, the housing's cylindrical sleeve 152 forms the housing chamber 155 (e.g., an annular space) around the basepipe 110, which communicates the sand control jackets 120A-B with the pipe's flow openings 118. As best illustrated in
Inside the housing chamber 155 and accessible when the sleeve 152 is removed, the inflow control device 130 has an internal sleeve 160 disposed over the location of the flow openings 118 in the basepipe 110. First 162 and second 164 ends of the flow control sleeve or pocket 160 are closed and attached to the basepipe 110 to enclose an interior chamber 165, which is in communication with the openings 118. Flow control sleeve or pocket 160 functions generally to conduct fluid from the ICD into a port 118. In some embodiments the flow control sleeve may be circumferentially disposed about the exterior surface of the basepipe 110, such as illustrated in
Each of the flow control devices 170 may include a flow port or aperture and may include a nozzle or insert 180 positioned therein for restricting or regulating the flow rate and producing a pressure drop across the device 170. Preferably, these nozzles 180 are composed of an erosion-resistant material, such as tungsten carbide, to prevent flow-induced erosion.
To configure the device 130 to control flow, only a set number of open nozzles 180 may be provided, or the nozzles 180 may all be open and selectively closed, such as by differential pressure. For example, pins 182 can be disposed in the nozzles 180 to close off or regulate flow through the nozzles 180. The pins 182 can likewise be removed to allow flow through the nozzles 180. Other variations, such as nozzles 180 with different internal passages, blank inserts disposed in the flow ports, etc., can be used to configure the flow control and restriction provided by the inflow control device 130 to meet the needs of an implementation.
In general, the sleeve 160 can have several (e.g., ten) flow devices 170, although they all may not be open during a given deployment. At the surface, operators may configure the number of flow devices 170 having open nozzles 180 (e.g., without pins 182) so the inflow control device 130 can produce a particular pressure drop needed in a given implementation. In this way, operators can configure flow through the device 130 to the basepipe's openings 118 through any of one to ten open flow devices 170. In turn, the device 130 can produce a configurable pressure drop along the screen jackets 120A-B. For example, if one open nozzle 180 is provided, the inflow control device 130 allows for less inflow and can produce an increasing pressure drop across the device 130 with an increasing flow rate. The more open nozzles 180 provided means that more inflow is possible, but less markedly will the device 130 exhibit an increase in pressure drop relative to an increase in flow rate.
Once configured, the inflow control device 130 (along with the sand screens) during operation downhole produces a pressure drop between the wellbore annulus and the string's interior bore 115. The pressure drop produced depends on fluid density and fluid viscosity so the device 130 may inhibit water production and encourage hydrocarbon production by backing up water from being produced. In particular, the open nozzles 180 of the flow devices 170 can be relatively insensitive to viscosity differences in fluid flow there-through and are instead sensitive to the density of the fluid. When fluid is produced from the borehole, the produced fluid flows through the open nozzles 180, which create a pressure drop that keeps the higher density of water backed up. This can be helpful if a water breakthrough event does occur during production.
The flow ports (e.g., nozzles 180) of the flow devices 170 are also preferably defined axially along the basepipe 110 so fluid flow passes parallel to the basepipe's axis, which evenly distributes flow along the production string. In the end, the inflow control device 130 can adjust an imbalance of the inflow caused by fluid-frictional losses in homogeneous reservoirs or caused by permeability variations in heterogeneous reservoirs.
In summary, the intermediately-mounted inflow control device 130 on the completion screen joint 100 can control the flow of produced fluid beyond what is conventionally available. During operation, fluid flow from the borehole annulus directs through the screen jackets 120A-B, and screened fluid passes in both directions along the basepipe 110 in the annular gaps to the centrally-mounted device 130. Reaching the ends of the jackets 120A-B, the flow of the screened fluid directs through the open end-rings 140A-B to the central inflow control device 130, where the open flow devices 170 restrict the flow of the screened fluid to the flow openings 118 in the basepipe 110.
By mounting the inflow control device 130 in this central position on the joint 50, the flow experienced by the jackets 120A-B is spread over twice the area. This can increase the life-span of the inflow control device 130 as well as its efficiency. In addition to better using the screening surface downhole, the intermediately-mounted device 130 on the joint 100 can facilitate treatment and cleanup operations. As noted above, bullheading may be used to pump treatment fluid into the borehole. The fluid is pumped down the bore 115 of the basepipe 110, through the openings 118, and out the inflow control device 130 and screens 120A-B. By having the intermediately-mounted device 130 between the screens 120A-B, the treatment fluid can be dispersed in two directions in the formation around the joint 100. This allows for better treatment of the formation and can prevent fluid loss and over-treating one area compared to others.
Another completion screen joint 100 of the present disclosure illustrated in
As before, fluid can pass into the sand control jackets 120A-B from the surrounding borehole annulus, and the screened fluid can pass along the annular gaps between the sand control jacket 120A-B and the basepipe 110. Outside edges of the screen jackets 120A-B have closed end-rings 125, preventing screened fluid from passing, so that the screened fluid instead passes to the open end-rings 140A-B to enter the inflow control device 130 disposed between the jackets 120A-B.
As best illustrated in
For its part, the housing 150 has cylindrical sleeves 152A-B and a flow ring 160 disposed about the basepipe 110. The flow ring 160 affixes to the basepipe 110, and the cylindrical sleeves 152A-B are supported on the end-rings 140A-B and the flow ring 160 to enclose two housing chambers 155A-B. One sleeve 152B can affix to the flow ring 160 and the second end-ring 140B, while the other sleeve 152A can removably fit on the flow ring 160 and end-ring 140A using lock wire 154 and seals or other mechanisms.
Being open, both end-rings 140A-B have internal channels, slots, or passages 142 that can fit partially over the inside edges of the jackets 120A-B as illustrated in
During operation, the cross-ports 166 communicate the second housing chamber (155B:
To configure how screened fluid can enter the basepipe 110 through the openings 118, the flow ring 160 has flow devices 170 that restrict flow of screened fluid from the housing chamber 155A to the pipe's openings 118. As before, the flow devices 170 can include a flow port, a constricted orifice, a nozzle, a tube, a syphon, or other such flow feature that controls and restricts the flow. Here, each of the flow devices 170 includes a nozzle 180 that produces a pressure drop in the flow of fluid through the flow port 164. These nozzles 180 can be configured opened or closed using pins 182 in the same manner as before.
Details of one of the nozzles 180 and the flow port 164 in the flow ring 160 are illustrated in
Similar to the arrangement described above, configuring the flow devices 170 on the inflow control device 130 of
The foregoing description of preferred and other embodiments is not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the inventive concepts conceived of by the Applicants. It will be appreciated with the benefit of the present disclosure that features described above in accordance with any embodiment or aspect of the disclosed subject matter can be utilized, either alone or in combination, with any other described feature, in any other embodiment or aspect of the disclosed subject matter.
In the present description, the inflow control devices 130 have been disclosed as including flow devices 170 to control flow of screened fluid from the borehole to the bore of a tubing string. As to be understood herein, the inflow control devices 130 are a form of flow device and can be referred to as such. Likewise, the flow devices 170 are a form of inflow control device and can be referred to as such.
In exchange for disclosing the inventive concepts contained herein, the Applicants desire all patent rights afforded by the appended claims. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims include all modifications and alterations to the full extent that they come within the scope of the following claims or the equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional No. 61/798,717, filed Mar. 15, 2013, and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1473644 | Rodrigo | Nov 1923 | A |
1594788 | McLaughlin et al. | Jan 1925 | A |
1620412 | Tweeddale | Mar 1927 | A |
2681111 | Thompson | Jun 1954 | A |
3173488 | Rensvold | Mar 1965 | A |
3357564 | Medford, Jr. et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3556219 | Meldau | Jan 1971 | A |
4064938 | Fast | Dec 1977 | A |
4428428 | Smyrl et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4657079 | Nagaoka | Apr 1987 | A |
4771829 | Sparlin | Sep 1988 | A |
4818403 | Nagaoka | Apr 1989 | A |
4945991 | Jones | Aug 1990 | A |
4977958 | Miller | Dec 1990 | A |
5004049 | Arterbury | Apr 1991 | A |
5069279 | Nagaoka | Dec 1991 | A |
5076359 | Yeh | Dec 1991 | A |
5082052 | Jones et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5083614 | Branch | Jan 1992 | A |
5113935 | Jones et al. | May 1992 | A |
5115864 | Gaidry et al. | May 1992 | A |
5161613 | Jones | Nov 1992 | A |
5161618 | Jones et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165476 | Jones | Nov 1992 | A |
5209296 | Donlon | May 1993 | A |
5222556 | Donlon | Jun 1993 | A |
5246158 | Nagaoka et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5307984 | Nagaoka et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311942 | Nagaoka | May 1994 | A |
5318119 | Lowry et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5332045 | Ross et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333688 | Jones et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5333689 | Jones et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341880 | Thorstensen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5355949 | Sparlin et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5390966 | Cox et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392850 | Cornette et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396954 | Brooks | Mar 1995 | A |
5404945 | Head et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415202 | Shiffler et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417284 | Jones | May 1995 | A |
5419394 | Jones | May 1995 | A |
5435391 | Jones | Jul 1995 | A |
5450898 | Sparlin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5476143 | Sparlin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5505260 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515915 | Jones et al. | May 1996 | A |
5560427 | Jones | Oct 1996 | A |
5588487 | Bryant | Dec 1996 | A |
5642781 | Richard | Jul 1997 | A |
5664628 | Koehler et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690175 | Jones | Nov 1997 | A |
5787980 | Sparlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803179 | Echols | Sep 1998 | A |
5842516 | Jones | Dec 1998 | A |
5848645 | Jones | Dec 1998 | A |
5868200 | Bryant et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881809 | Gillespie | Mar 1999 | A |
5890533 | Jones | Apr 1999 | A |
5896928 | Coon | Apr 1999 | A |
5909774 | Griffith et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5934376 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6003600 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6112817 | Voll et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125932 | Hamid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6220345 | Jones et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223906 | Williams | May 2001 | B1 |
6227303 | Jones | May 2001 | B1 |
6230803 | Morton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6298916 | Tibbles et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302207 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6405800 | Walker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409219 | Broome et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427775 | Dusterhoft et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446722 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464261 | Dybevik et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481494 | Dusterhoft et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494265 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6513599 | Bixenman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516881 | Hailey, Jr. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6540022 | Dusterhoft et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557634 | Hailey, Jr. et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575245 | Hurst et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575251 | Watson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581689 | Hailey, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588506 | Jones | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601646 | Streich et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6619397 | Coon et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622794 | Zisk, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6644406 | Jones | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666274 | Hughes | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675245 | Schmidt | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6695067 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698518 | Royer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715544 | Gillespie et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749023 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749024 | Bixenman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752206 | Watson et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752207 | Donos | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755245 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6789623 | Hill, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814139 | Hejl et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817410 | Wetzel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830104 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6848510 | Bixenman et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857475 | Johnson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6886634 | Richards | May 2005 | B2 |
6923262 | Broome et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935432 | Nguyen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6983796 | Bayne et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986390 | Doanne et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997263 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7048061 | Bode et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055598 | Ross et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096945 | Richards et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100691 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104324 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7152677 | Parlar et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7207383 | Hurst et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7234518 | Smith | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243724 | McGregor et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252142 | Brezinski et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264061 | Dybevik et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7370700 | Hurst et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377320 | Michel | May 2008 | B2 |
7383886 | Dybevik et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7431058 | Holting | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7464752 | Dale et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475725 | Yeh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7581586 | Russell | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7625846 | Cooke, Jr. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7661476 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7735559 | Malone | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7814973 | Dusterhoft et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7845407 | Bunnell et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7861787 | Russell | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7870898 | Yeh et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7891420 | Dale et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7984760 | Haeberle et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987909 | Pineda | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8127831 | Haeberle et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8225863 | Hammer | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8245778 | Yeh et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8522867 | Yeh et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9027642 | Sladic | May 2015 | B2 |
20030159825 | Hurst et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030173075 | Morvant et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189010 | Wilhelm | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040007829 | Ross | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040140089 | Gunneroed | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050039917 | Hailey, Jr. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045329 | Wetzel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067170 | Richard | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082060 | Ward et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050178562 | Livingstone | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070114020 | Brekke | May 2007 | A1 |
20080006402 | Russell | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080041577 | Baaijens et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080217002 | Simonds et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080283238 | Richards | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000787 | Hill | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090095471 | Guignard et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151925 | Richards | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159279 | Assal | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159298 | Assal | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090277650 | Casciaro et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100084133 | Weirich et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100096120 | Ayasse | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100175894 | Debard et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120061093 | Garcia et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130062066 | Broussard et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130092394 | Holderman | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140262324 | Greci | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2013055451 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Yeh, C.S. et al., “A Self-Mitigating Sand Control Screen”, SPE 121844, SPE European Formation Damage Conference, May 27-29, 2009, 6 pages, Scheveningen, The Netherlands. |
Yeh, C.S. et al., “Advancing Self-Mitigating Sand Control Screen”, IPTC 13614, International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dec. 7-9, 2009, 7 pages, Doha Qatar. |
Yeh, C.S. et al., “Enhancing Sand Screen Reliability: An Innovative, Adaptive Approach”, SPE 134492, SPE Annual Technical Conference, Sep. 19-22, 2010, 9 pages, Florence, Italy. |
Yeh, C.S. et al., “Unlocking the Limits of Sand Screen Reliability with an Innovative and Self-Adapting Technology”, IPTC 14623, 2011, 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140262322 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61798717 | Mar 2013 | US |