The invention relates to the development of a body support element for an office chair and more particularly, to the apparatus and process for determining the configuration of a lumbar support pad for the office chair to support the back of the chair occupant.
Preferably, conventional office chairs are designed to provide significant levels of comfort and adjustability. Such chairs typically include a base which supports a tilt control mechanism to which a seat assembly and back assembly are movably interconnected. The tilt control mechanism includes a back upright which extends rearwardly and upwardly and supports the back assembly rearwardly adjacent to the seat assembly. The tilt control mechanism serves to interconnect the seat and back assembly so that they may tilt rearwardly together in response to movements by the chair occupant, and possibly to permit limited forward tilting of the seat and back. Further, such chairs typically permit the back to also move relative to the seat during such rearward tilting.
The chair also is designed to provide additional support assemblies to provide further support to the occupant's body at various locations thereof. In this regard, support assemblies have been provided which attempt to provide adjustable support to the lower back of the user in the lumbar region thereof. However, one difficulty associated with the design of conventional office chairs is the fact that office workers have different physical characteristics and comfort preferences such that it is difficult to design a single chair configuration that satisfies the preferences of the different individuals who might purchase such a chair.
To improve comfort, it is known to provide lumbar supports which allow for adjustment of the elevation of the lumbar support along the back of the user. However, often times, such lumbar supports may be found uncomfortable to various individuals since they tend to provide localized pressure on the lumbar region of the back.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to overcome disadvantages associated with prior lumbar support arrangements and to develop a lumbar support using test data that represents the actual, quantifiable comfort preferences of a group of test occupants.
The invention relates to a chair having an improved back assembly which provides support to the back region of the chair occupant. The back assembly of the invention includes a lumbar support arrangement preferably disposed in the lumbar region of the back which is adjustable vertically to accommodate different sizes of chair users.
The back assembly is of the type having an open annular frame with a suspension fabric extending therebetween to close the central opening of the back frame. Since this suspension fabric is only a thin layer of material, the support provided by the lumbar support assembly is more readily felt and it is more critical to provide a comfortable lumbar support pad.
In an effort to provide optimum support to the back of the chair occupant, the lumbar support pad itself is formed of concentric support rings wherein radially adjacent pairs of such rings are flexibly joined together by connector webs extending therebetween. To a certain extent, each ring can independently move or is at least supported independently relative to an adjacent ring. This allows for greater variations in support pressure being applied by each ring to the back of the occupant, and the lumbar support pad more readily adjusts to the shape of the occupant's back. The support pad therefore provides an adjustable and optimized amount of asymmetric support pressure while maintaining a proper ergonomic posture to the seated occupant. Further, the selected locations of the connector webs provides support to areas of the pad that have been determined to be most preferable as a result of the test apparatus and method of the invention.
Additionally, the lumbar support pad is carried by a support arm formed similar to a leaf spring wherein the support arm has a vertically elongate opening in the middle thereof to separate the left and right halves of the support arm from each other along a substantial portion of the length of each support arm. While the support arm may bend rearwardly in response to the occupant or at least resiliently resist such movement, the bending point for each of the left and right halves is independently adjustable so that the support provided to the lumbar support pad is asymmetric with respect to the left and right halves of the support pad. This support arm provides asymmetric support to the lumbar support pad and each half thereof provides support pressures which are more independent of the other. The chair occupant therefore can more accurately adjust the support provided by the support pad asymmetrically wherein it has been found through testing that this asymmetric support provides improved comfort to the chair occupant.
The invention further relates to the test apparatus and process for determining the optimum design of the lumbar pad. The test apparatus includes a test rig on a chair which determines the contour and pressure map of the lumbar support preferred by the occupant when seated.
The test rig has a support plate rearwardly of and facing toward the lumbar area of the occupant's back. The support plate includes an array of adjustable testers which project toward and contact the occupant's lumbar area. The preferred testers are arranged in a rectangular grid pattern of rows and columns and include a plunger like contact pad. The pad is spring-loaded and supported on a plunger rod. The plunger rod is attached on the support plate and movable relative thereto to adjust the resiliently biased pressure being applied by the contact pad to the lumbar area. An FSA pressure mapping system is further used to verify and quantify the pressure being applied to the lumbar.
As a result of this pressure mapping testing process, the above-described lumbar pad was developed to provide optimum support to the occupant. It will be understood that the test process was primarily directed to development of the lumbar pad although other support pads or structures in the back and/or seat could be developed through the test apparatus and process of the invention.
Other objects and purposes of the invention, and variations thereof, will be apparent upon reading the following specification and inspecting the accompanying drawings.
Certain terminology will be used in the following description for convenience and reference only, and will not be limiting. For example, the words “upwardly”, “downwardly”, “rightwardly” and “leftwardly” will refer to directions in the drawings to which reference is made. The words “inwardly” and “outwardly” will refer to directions toward and away from, respectively, the geometric center of the arrangement and designated parts thereof. Said terminology will include the words specifically mentioned, derivatives thereof, and words of similar import.
Referring to
Generally, this chair 10 includes improved height-adjustable arm assemblies 12 which are readily adjustable. The structure of each arm assembly 12 is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/657,632, entitled ARM ASSEMBLY FOR A CHAIR, which is owned by Haworth, Inc., the common assignee of this present invention. The disclosure of this patent application is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
The chair 10 is supported on a base 13 having radiating legs 14 which are supported on the floor by casters 15. The base 13 further includes an upright pedestal 16 which projects vertically and supports a tilt control mechanism 18 on the upper end thereof. The pedestal 16 has a pneumatic cylinder therein which permits adjustment of the height or elevation of the tilt control mechanism 18 relative to a floor.
The tilt control mechanism 18 includes a control body 19 on which a pair of generally L-shaped uprights 20 are pivotally supported by their front ends. The uprights 20 converge rearwardly together to define a connector hub 22 (
The back assembly 24 has a suspension fabric 25 supported about its periphery on the corresponding periphery of the frame 23 to define a suspension surface 26 against which the back of a chair occupant is supported. The structure of one back assembly 24 is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/657,313, entitled CHAIR BACK, which is owned by Haworth, Inc. The disclosure of this patent application is incorporated herein by reference.
To provide additional support to the occupant, the back assembly 24 includes a lumbar support unit 28 which is configured to support the lumbar region of the occupant's back and is adjustable to improve the comfort of this support. Also, the back assembly 24 is provided with a pelvic support unit 29 disposed rearwardly of the pelvic region of the chair occupant. This back arrangement is disclosed in further detail in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/657,312, entitled CHAIR BACK WITH LUMBAR AND PELVIC SUPPORTS, which is owned by Haworth, Inc. The disclosure thereof is incorporated herein by reference.
Additionally, the chair 10 includes a seat assembly 30 that defines an upward facing support surface 31 on which the seat of the occupant is supported.
Turning first to the back assembly 24 which supports the lumbar support unit 28 and the pelvic support unit 29, the back assembly 24 is generally illustrated in
To support the occupant, the back assembly 24 includes the suspension fabric 25 which is secured taughtly on the frame. Specifically, the back frame 23 includes a peripheral channel 42 (
Referring further to
The lower end of the support column 44 includes a generally L-shaped connector flange 46 (
Referring more particularly to the components of the back assembly 24,
The rear frame unit 55 comprises the support structure 43 and the rear frame ring 56, wherein the support structure 43 and the rear frame ring 56 are molded simultaneously together in a one-piece monolithic construction having the contoured shape described above. To facilitate molding of this contoured shape while still possessing the channel 42 mentioned above, the rear frame ring 56 and front frame ring 57 are molded separate from each other and then affixed together.
Turning to the support structure 43, the support column 44 thereof is located centrally within the lower half of the central frame opening 40. The support column 44 has a base end 59 and a pair of column halves 60 and 61 which are separated from each other by a vertically elongate column slot 62 (
The rear frame unit 55 and front frame ring 57 are formed from a glass filled nylon material that is molded into the desired shapes wherein this material has limited flexure so as to permit flexing of the various areas of the frame when placed under load by a chair occupant. Since the column halves 60 and 61 are separated from each other, these column halves 60 and 61 may articulate independently of each other to facilitate flexing and movement of the various frame corners 38 and 39. The upper ends of the frame halves 60 and 61 join integrally to the transverse arms 45, wherein the outer ends of the arms 45 extend outwardly and are molded integral with the vertical sides of the rear frame ring 56.
In the column base 59, this column base 59 terminates at a bottom wall 65 (
Further as to the bottom column wall 65 as seen in
Referring to
As to the front frame ring 57 (
Turning next to the lumbar support unit 28, this unit is generally illustrated in
The carriage supports a resilient support arm 93 that effectively serves as a leaf spring so that the lumbar pad 91 may float rearwardly in response to movements of the occupant. Further, the support arm 93 provides asymmetric support to the lumbar pad 91 such that one-half of the lumbar pad 91 may apply less support pressure to the occupant as compared to the other half of the lumbar pad 91 which may provide firmer support. The asymmetric support pressures of the lumbar pad 91 is adjustable by a pair of adjustment cranks 94 and 95 (
Referring to
Referring to
More particularly, the pad 91 comprises a central mounting section 101 which is horizontally elongate and offset rearwardly relative to the front pad face 102. The mounting section 101 has a back wall 103 in which is formed a pair of suspension slots 104 as seen in
While it is known to provide a lumbar pad which has a continuous solid construction, the pad 91 of the invention is defined by a plurality of concentric support rings 106-109 which generally extend parallel to each other but are radially spaced apart from each other and are offset in the front-to-back direction. Each adjacent pair of rings is joined together by molded connector webs 111-114.
The innermost support ring 106 is joined at two locations by the webs 111 to the opposite ends of the mounting section 101 such that the vertical sections of this support ring 106 are joined to the mounting section 101 while the remaining horizontal ring sections are completely separated from the mounting section 101.
Since the rings 106-109 and webs 111-114 are all molded together as a one-piece construction, differing support pressures applied by one ring relative to the other is still permitted due to the deformability of the mold material from which the lumbar pad 91 is formed and the different support characteristics provided by the geometry and locations of the webs 111-114. These concentric rings 106-109 are separated from each other along most of their peripheral length so as to allow for greater changes to the contour of the pad face 102 when pressed rearwardly by the back of the chair occupant. As such, each ring can move independently of the others to allow greater variation in pressure distribution to the occupant's back while able to conform to proper ergonomic contours.
The outer three support rings 107-109 are joined one with the other by the webs 112-114. In the upper half of the pad 91, the connector webs 112-114 are located in the upper left and right corners 116. However, in the region of the lower corners 117, no such webs are provided. Rather, the additional webs 119-121 are aligned more centrally within the pad 91 and angled downwardly and outwardly. As such, the specific lumbar configuration illustrated provides more support to the occupant's back in the region of the upper corners 116 since the webs 112-114 cause these upper corner portions 116 to have somewhat greater stiffness than the top portion of the pad 91 located between these corners 116. In this middle area, the horizontal sections of the rings 106-109 are completely separated from each other and have greater relative flexibility.
In the region of the lower corners 117, however, no webs are provided such that these lower corner portions 117 are more flexible with the lower half of the pad 91 being somewhat stiffer in the region of the webs 119-121. By selectively placing the webs 111-114 and 119-121, the response characteristics of the lumbar pad 91 may be selectively designed through use of the test apparatus and process disclosed herein to vary the pressure distribution of the lumbar pad 91 in response to contact with the occupant. Further, the performance characteristics can be varied depending upon the height, width, placement and number of webs 111-114 and 119-121 which may be selectively varied.
With respect to
In addition to the foregoing, it is noted that each of the rings 106-109 has a rearwardly curved portion in the region of the vertical center line of the lumbar pad 91 so as to form a central groove 123 (
It will be understood that while the various connector webs 111-114 and 119-121 are generally diagonally aligned, it is possible to provide additional webs in the regions between these locations and that the webs also could be provided in alternate positions, such as staggered from each other, to provide alternative response characteristics to the lumbar pad 91.
Also, the inner support rings 106-108 are formed as endless loops. The outermost ring 109 is substantially similar except that a central portion on the bottom of the lumber pad 91 is omitted. Specifically, the region of the outer ring 109 between the webs 121 is not provided so that the lumber pad 91 has a space or notch 124 (
The arrangement of the support arm 93 provides resilient asymmetric support to this lumbar pad 91 and allows the left and right halves of the lumbar pad 91 to have different performance characteristics. In particular, the left spring half of the arm 93 would provide greater resistance to displacement of the left half of the lumbar pad 91 while the right spring half of arm 93 would provide less resistance to this rearward displacement of the right pad half which thereby provides different support pressures to the pad 91.
To selectively adjust the asymmetric support, the adjustment cranks 94 and 95 (
The above-described discussion relates to the preferred lumbar support unit 28. The lumbar pad 91 may also have an alternative configuration as illustrated in
More particularly, this alternative lumbar pad 200 is substantially similar to the lumbar pad 91 except for differences in the overall shape, web locations and the web construction.
More particularly, this lumbar pad 200 includes a central mounting section 201 which in this instance includes fastener holes 202 to allow for fixed attachment of this lumber pad 200 to an appropriate support arm that would have screw holes rather than the hooks 99. This particular lumbar pad 200 has an hourglass shape defined by larger outer ends and a narrower center area.
The pad 200 is defined by a plurality of concentric support rings 206-209 which are joined in radially separated relation by connector webs 211-214 and additional connector webs 219-221. In this configuration, the innermost ring 206 is connected to the central section 201 by the pair of connector webs 211 that are formed substantially similar to the webs 111 described above. Additionally, the outer support rings 207-209 are supported by the connector webs 212-214, which webs 212-214 extend diagonally outwardly at the upper pad corners 216.
The pad 200 differs in that the connector webs 219-221 are located diagonally adjacent to each other at the lower corners 217 of the pad 200 which therefore provides response characteristics at the upper corners 216 and lower corners 217 that are substantially similar. This also provides greater flexibility in the spinal area of the bottom half of the pad 200 since the connector webs 219-221 are shifted farther outwardly as compared to the connector webs 119-121.
Further, the webs 212-214 and 219-221 differ in that they are formed as rearwardly curving shapes. Due to the resiliency of the mold material, these webs 212-214 function more as J-shaped springs as opposed to the flatter webs 112-114 and 119-121. This allows radially adjacent rings to move more independently of each other since there is more length to the webs 212-214 and 219-221 as compared to the flatter webs described above which therefore provides more resiliency.
Like the pad 91, this pad 200 also includes a central clearance groove 223 in the area of the spinal column to avoid contact with this part of the occupant's body.
To affect the design and development of the lumbar pads 91 or 200, a test chair 300 (
Generally as to the test chair 300, this chair includes a conventional base 303, a tilt control mechanism 304 and a modified seat-back assembly 305 mounted to the tilt control 304. The tilt control mechanism 304 includes a pair of generally L-shaped uprights 307 which have their forward ends 308 pivotally connected to a tilt control body 309 to permit downward or rearward tilting of the seat-back arrangement 305. The uprights 307 project rearwardly and upwardly and are joined together by upper and lower cross rails 310 and 311.
The seat-back arrangement 305 includes a conventional cushion seat 312 and a modified back cushion 314 which is supported on the uprights 307 by a mounting bracket 315. The chair back 314 is cushioned and is similar to a conventional back except that the vertical dimension thereof is substantially reduced or cut off so that it is only adapted to contact and support the upper thoracic region of the test subject when seated on the chair 300. As a result of the reduced vertical length of the chair back 314, an open test region or space 316 is defined vertically between the rear edge 317 (
Within this test region 316, the test rig 301 is mounted to the uprights 307 as described in further detail herein wherein the test rig 301 is adapted to selectively contact the lumbar region of the test subject for determining the support preferences of a plurality of such test subjects and then merging this data to design and develop the lumbar pad 91.
It is noted that the testing process and the apparatus are particularly designed for evaluating the support preferences of the lumbar region of each subject's back. However, this test rig 301 also could be located and adapted for engagement with other areas of the occupant's body such as the thoracic region.
More particularly as to the test rig 301, the rig 301 comprises a plurality and preferably four elongate support rods 320 which have their forward ends 321 rigidly affixed to the uprights 307 so that the guide rods 320 project rearwardly from the uprights 307 in cantilevered relation. The opposite rearward, free ends of the guide rods 320 have a rectangular backing plate 322 rigidly affixed thereto. This backing plate 322 has an exterior rectangular shape but is cut-out from the center thereof to define a generally rectangular window 323 which opens horizontally therethrough.
The test rig 301 further includes a rectangular slide plate or support plate 325 (
To develop and acquire data associated with the preferred support pressures being applied to a test subject's lumbar region and if desired to indicate the contour of the user's back, the slide plate 325 is provided with an array of adjustable testers or diodes 330 (
The tester 330 is a multi-component telescoping assembly having a plunger-like contact pad 332 on the end thereof. The individual testers 330 are moveably engaged with the slidable support plate 325.
In particular, the support plate 325 includes an array of threaded apertures 333 wherein each such aperture 333 is adapted to support a corresponding one of the testers 330. Each tester 330 includes a threaded support bushing 334 that has an outer surface 335 that is threaded so as to be threadedly engaged with the corresponding inside face of the plate aperture 333 and be stationarily mounted on the slide plate 325 and move in unison therewith.
The bushing 335 also has a threaded interior bore 336 which opens horizontally therethrough, and the tester 330 further comprises a horizontally elongate adjustment shaft 337 which includes outer circumferential threads 338 thereon. These threads 338 engage the interior surface 336 of the support bushing 334 such that rotation of the adjustment shaft 337 effects longitudinal displacement of the tester 330 relative to the forwardly or rearwardly support plate 325.
The rearward end of the shaft 337 includes a hand knob 339 for manual rotation of the shaft 337 and also includes a drive socket 340 on the rear end thereof which is adapted to be engaged by a driving machine 341 (
The adjustment shaft 337 includes a hollow open front end 342 which hollow end 342 opens rearwardly into an interior chamber or blind bore of the shaft 337 as indicated diagrammatically by phantom reference line 343. This interior chamber 343 includes a coil spring therein which generally serves to axially bias the contact pad 332 in a forward direction.
More particularly, the tester 330 includes a plunger rod 345 which is slideably fitted into the shaft bore through the open end 342. The innermost end of this plunger rod 345 is enclosed within the chamber 343 of the adjustment shaft 337 and is normally biased forwardly by the internal spring, which spring also permits inward retraction of the plunger rod 345 as described in further detail hereinafter. The particular spring used herein preferably has a predetermined spring rate which preferably is two (2) pounds per inch. Since the actual displacement of the plunger rod 345 during retraction thereof is measured, this spring rate may be used to calculate the actual spring load being applied to the rod 345 during the testing procedure.
The outermost end of the rod 345 includes the aforementioned contact pad 332 thereon. The contact pad 332 has a circular front face 349 and is connected to the end of the rod 345 by a swivel connector 350 which allows the front face 349 to tilt several in any of the forward or rearward directions and the sideward directions as generally indicated by reference arrow 351 (
Along the length of the plunger rod 345, a plurality of equi-distant surface indicators 352 are provided to indicate the relative axial displacement of the rod 345 into the adjustment shaft 337. More particularly, a plurality of solid indicator bands 346 are provided at a relatively large distance apart from each other. Four (4) additional intermediate bands 347 are provided between the main indicator bands 346 to incrementally divide the space between these main bands 346. Each of the bands is about 0.100 inches in axial length and are spaced apart from each other by about 0.100 inches. As such, a relative axial displacement of the contact pad 332 rearwardly relative to the shaft 337 may be readily calculated by determining how many of the original indicator rings 346 or 347 are hidden within this shaft 337 or vice-versa, the number of exposed rings 346 or 347 may be determined which will give an accurate measurement of the length of the exposed portion of the plunger rod 345 as well as the hidden portion of the plunger rod 345. By determining this relative axial displacement of each rod 345, the overall spring load acting axially forwardly along the rod 345 and the contact pad 332 may be calculated. Specifically, the displacement distance of the plunger rod 345 indicates the compression of the interior spring which distance and compression along with the spring rate provides a relative spring force acting on the rod 345. Thus, the indicator bands 346 and 347 allow for mathematical determination of the axial displacement of the contact pad 332 as well as the spring force acting thereon.
It is noted that the contact pad 332 for each of the testers 330 has a relatively large diameter of about 1.5 inches and a substantially smaller spacing between adjacent pads 332.
Typically, the contact pad 332 is displaced during the testing procedure when a test subject is seated within the chair 300. However, the measurements are best determined after the test subject leaves the chair 300 so as to expose the test rig 301 and allow for visual determination of the magnitude of displacement. In this regard, each tester 330 preferably includes a marking arrangement to mark the relative retraction amount of the plunger rod 345 during the test. This is accomplished by an elastomeric O-ring 355 (
The pull wire 356 includes a circular eyelet 357 that surrounds the rod 345 and abuts axially against the side surface of the marker 355. This eyelet 357 is connected to a radial leg 358 of the pullwire 356 which in turn connects to an axial leg 359 which extends rearwardly through a corresponding bore 360 in the slide plate 325. A rearward exposed end portion of the axial leg 359 serves as a pull handle 361 as seen in
As generally described above, each tester 330 provides an indication of the location of the contact pad 332 as well as the spring pressure being applied thereby to the test subject. To further evaluate the contact pressures being applied to the chair occupant, an additional pressure determination system is provided in conjunction with the testers 330. More particularly, as generally illustrated in
The pressure mapping system is a commercially available system sold by Verg Technologies of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The pressure mat 364 used on the back is a high-resolution rectangular mat that preferably collects 1,024 contact pressure data points (32 sensors by 32 sensors) per frame. The centers of these pressure map centers are approximately three millimeters apart wherein the pressure mapping system and the data collection equipment is set to collect ten frames per second. Preferably during the testing process, the data is collected over periods of several seconds for each adjustment of a tester 330. This pressure mapping system was used to further determine the pressures acting upon the occupant's back 365. Additionally, an additional pressure mat 366 was provided on the seat which mat 366 wrapped over the opposite side edges of the seat 312 and was also secured in place thereon. This pressure mat 366 is a lower resolution mat which primarily functions to determine the physical location of the seat of the occupant 365 during the test procedure.
More particularly as to the actual use of the testers 330, the test process generally involves first positioning the test rig 301 to the test position illustrated in
Generally, during a test run, the test subject is seated within the chair 300 wherein the thirty five (35) testers 330 are adjusted in their position and their contact pressure until reaching a point where the subject is of the subjective opinion that this provides a most comfortable quantity of pressure on their lumbar region. Each one of the thirty five (35) testers 330 is adjusted individually so that the distribution of comfort pressures being applied by each one individually may vary from one tester 330 to the other. Typically at the beginning of a run, every other tester 330 is in the retracted position of
At the beginning of a test run, the marker 355 is disposed in the forwardmost position as seen in
More typically during the test, a test subject may prefer an increased amount of support pressure being applied to the lumbar region which support pressure may vary. This is permitted as depicted in
Referring now to
By determining this amount of retraction, the overall contact pressure may be determined based on the retraction measurement and the spring rate. Additionally, the relative positions of the contact pads 332 may be used to determine and evaluate the contour of the lumbar region.
During a testing procedure, three (3) runs are conducted with the chair back in a normal upright position as seen in
Generally in a typical test run, the individual testers 330 were selectively adjusted in response to the occupant. During a first run, the testers 330 were located alternatingly in a forward position such as that illustrated in
Additionally, at the beginning of the process, the test subject manually presses on the mat at the lumbar location of their chair back to set a reference location. The pressure mat then was set to collect one thousand twenty four (1,024) contact pressure data points per frame with ten frames of data collected per second. After each adjustment of a tester, data was collected for about five seconds resulting in a total of about fifty frames of pressure sensor readings. During each run there was an initial collection period and a final collection period and on average, about five (5) total adjustments were made of the testers 330 so as to result in about seven (7) data collection periods for a particular subject during a single run. Preferably, three (3) runs were conducted in the upright position with the first run having the testers displaced forwardly or rearwardly in alternating relation and then this arrangement was reversed in the next run. These first two runs were conducted in an effort to obtain convergence of the comfort pressures and verify the data from the first run with the data derived from the second run. A third run was then conducted to determine the repeatability of the comfort pressures.
An additional test run was conducted with the chair in a reclined position. Once all of this data was collected for multiple test subjects, a map of the pressure characteristics of each person was developed and this information was then used to design the above described lumbar pads 91 and 200 in a manner which provided comfort to the greatest range of chair occupants. In this regard, it was determined that the majority of occupants preferred an asymmetrical pressure distribution in the lumbar region within a desired range, thus confirming the desirability of the asymmetrical adjustment structure described above relative to the pads 91 and 200.
Although particular preferred embodiments of the invention have been disclosed in detail for illustrative purposes, it will be recognized that variations or modifications of the disclosed apparatus, including the rearrangement of parts, lie within the scope of the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/689,780, filed Jun. 10, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
889224 | Haas | Jun 1908 | A |
2301841 | Zeder | Nov 1942 | A |
2378039 | Schenker | Jun 1945 | A |
3081129 | Ridder | Mar 1963 | A |
3288525 | Cerf | Nov 1966 | A |
4309058 | Barley | Jan 1982 | A |
4465317 | Schwarz | Aug 1984 | A |
4744351 | Grundei et al. | May 1988 | A |
4876758 | Rolloff et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4993164 | Jacobsen | Feb 1991 | A |
4998354 | Silverman et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
6217121 | Mollet | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6394545 | Knoblock et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6460928 | Knoblock et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6595585 | Mundell | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616228 | Heidmann | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623076 | Klingler | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6666511 | Schuster et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
20030075959 | Xue et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030164634 | Da Silva | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030227203 | Mundell | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 296 938 | Jun 1991 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60689780 | Jun 2005 | US |