The present techniques relate to a system associated with an enhanced swing adsorption process. In particular, the system relates to a swing adsorption process for removal of contaminants from a feed stream utilizing adsorbent beds which may be integrated with downstream equipment to enhance recovery of hydrocarbons.
Gas separation is useful in many industries and can typically be accomplished by flowing a mixture of gases over an adsorbent material that preferentially adsorbs one or more gas components, while not adsorbing one or more other gas components. The non-adsorbed components are recovered as a separate product.
One particular type of gas separation technology is swing adsorption, such as temperature swing adsorption (TSA), pressure swing adsorption (PSA), partial pressure purge swing adsorption (PPSA), rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption (RCPSA), rapid cycle partial pressure swing adsorption (RCPPSA), and not limited to but also combinations of the fore mentioned processes, such as pressure and temperature swing adsorption. As an example, PSA processes rely on the phenomenon of gases being more readily adsorbed within the pore structure or free volume of an adsorbent material when the gas is under pressure. That is, the higher the gas pressure, the greater the amount of readily-adsorbed gas adsorbed. When the pressure is reduced, the adsorbed component is released, or desorbed from the adsorbent material.
The swing adsorption processes (e.g., PSA and TSA) may be used to separate gases of a gas mixture because different gases tend to fill the micropore of the adsorbent material to different extents. For example, if a gas mixture, such as natural gas, is passed under pressure through a vessel containing an adsorbent material that is more selective towards carbon dioxide than it is for methane, at least a portion of the carbon dioxide is selectively adsorbed by the adsorbent material, and the gas exiting the vessel is enriched in methane. When the adsorbent material reaches the end of its capacity to adsorb carbon dioxide, it is regenerated in a PSA process, for example, by reducing the pressure, thereby releasing the adsorbed carbon dioxide. The adsorbent material is then typically purged and repressurized. Then, the adsorbent material is ready for another adsorption cycle.
The swing adsorption processes typically involve one or more adsorbent bed units, which include adsorbent beds disposed within a housing configured to maintain fluids at various pressures for different steps in an adsorption cycle within the unit. These adsorbent bed units utilize different packing material in the bed structures. For example, the adsorbent bed units utilize checker brick, pebble beds or other available packing. As an enhancement, some adsorbent bed units may utilize engineered packing within the bed structure. The engineered packing may include a material provided in a specific configuration, such as a honeycomb, ceramic forms or the like.
Further, various adsorbent bed units may be coupled together with conduits and valves to manage the flow of fluids. Orchestrating these adsorbent bed units involves coordinating the cycles for each adsorbent bed unit with other adsorbent bed units in the system. A complete PSA cycle can vary from seconds to minutes as it transfers a plurality of gaseous streams through one or more of the adsorbent bed units.
Typical sour gas treating facilities may use amine systems to remove acid gas from hydrocarbon feed stream. The process utilizes the amine system to divide the streams into a water saturated hydrocarbon stream and a water saturated acid gas stream. The hydrocarbon stream may then be monetized, which typically requires some level of dehydration. For cryogenic applications, the hydrocarbon stream may be passed through a molecular sieve system to form a dry sweet gas stream. The acid gas stream may be reinjected into the ground which also requires some level of dehydration. The acid gas stream from the amine system may be passed to a tri-ethylene glycol (TEG) system to form a dry acid gas stream. Unfortunately, typical amine systems require the gas streams to be saturated with water which results in the use of large amounts of water and requires additional make-up water for the moisture (e.g., water) lost in the hydrocarbon and acid gas streams. The requirement for water may be problematic in regions that do not have sufficient water supplies and/or in regions where disposal of water may be expensive. Further, the use of the large amounts of water may also result in larger equipment footprints.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the industry for apparatus, methods, and systems that provide enhancements to the processing of gaseous streams with adsorbent beds. The present techniques provide enhancements by utilizing swing adsorption processes to separate contaminants from a feed stream and regenerate the adsorbent bed units with less water than utilized in conventional approaches. The present techniques overcomes the drawbacks of conventional systems by using a specific configuration.
In an embodiment, a cyclical swing adsorption process for removing contaminants from a feed stream is described. The cyclical swing adsorption process comprises: a) performing one or more adsorption steps, wherein each of the adsorption steps comprises passing a feed stream from a solvent based gas treating system, such as an amine system, through a swing adsorption system to remove one or more contaminants from the feed stream and to form a product stream; b) performing one or more purge steps, wherein each of the purge steps comprises passing a purge stream through the swing adsorption system in a counter flow direction relative to the flow of the feed stream to form a purge product stream, wherein the purge product stream is passed to the solvent based gas treating system; and c) repeating the steps a) to b) for at least one additional cycle.
Other enhancement may include: i) performing one or more acid gas adsorption steps, wherein each of the acid gas adsorption steps comprises passing the wet acid gas stream from the solvent based gas treating system through a second swing adsorption system to remove one or more contaminants from the wet acid gas stream and to form a dry acid gas stream, ii) performing one or more acid gas purge steps, wherein each of the acid gas purge steps comprises passing the feed stream through the second swing adsorption system in a counter flow direction relative to the flow of the wet acid gas stream to form an acid gas purge product stream, wherein the acid gas purge product stream is passed to the solvent based gas treating system, and iii) repeating the steps i) to ii) for at least one additional cycle; wherein greater than 95 volume percent (%) of the acid gas in the purge stream is recycled to the second swing adsorption system from the solvent based gas treating system in the wet acid gas stream; and/or wherein greater than 95 volume % of the hydrocarbons in the purge stream are recycled to the swing adsorption system from the solvent based gas treating system in the feed stream.
In another embodiment, a system for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream, the system comprising: a swing adsorption system configured to receive a facility feed stream and to pass at least a first portion of the facility feed stream though a first plurality of swing adsorption bed units, wherein each of the first plurality of swing adsorption bed units are configured to perform a first swing adsorption process to remove water from the each of the first plurality of swing adsorption bed units during a purge step and form a first purge product stream; an solvent based gas treating system in fluid communication with the swing adsorption system and configured to separate one or more contaminants from the purge product stream to form a feed stream and an acid gas stream and to pass the feed stream from the solvent based gas treating system to the swing adsorption system.
The foregoing and other advantages of the present disclosure may become apparent upon reviewing the following detailed description and drawings of non-limiting examples of embodiments.
Unless otherwise explained, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. The singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, the word “or” is intended to include “and” unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “includes” means “comprises.” All patents and publications mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety, unless otherwise indicated. In case of conflict as to the meaning of a term or phrase, the present specification, including explanations of terms, control. Directional terms, such as “upper,” “lower,” “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “vertical,” and “horizontal,” are used herein to express and clarify the relationship between various elements. It should be understood that such terms do not denote absolute orientation (e.g., a “vertical” component can become horizontal by rotating the device). The materials, methods, and examples recited herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
As used herein, “stream” refers to fluid (e.g., solids, liquid and/or gas) being conducted through various equipment. The equipment may include conduits, vessels, manifolds, units or other suitable devices.
As used herein, “solvent based gas treating system” or “solvent based gas treating process” refers to a method or system that utilizes a solvent (e.g., a liquid solvent) to absorb a specific species (typically a contaminant) from an input stream to generate a gas product stream that has higher purity of the desired product than the input stream and a solvent stream that includes a portion of the specific species. The method or system may perform the steps of: exposing an input stream to a liquid solvent to adsorb a specific species from the input stream and then removing the specific species from the solvent stream via a regeneration step, which may involve the use of heat to promote the removal of the adsorbed species.
As used herein, volume percent is based on standard conditions. The standard conditions for a method may be normalized to the temperature of 0° Celsius (C) (e.g., 32° Fahrenheit (F)) and absolute pressure of 100 kiloPascals (kPa) (1 bar).
As used herein, “conduit” refers to a tubular member forming a channel through which fluids or the other materials are conveyed. The conduit may include one or more of a pipe, a manifold, a tube or the like.
The present techniques relate to a swing adsorption process (e.g., a rapid cycle process) for the dehydration of a feed stream (e.g., stream from an amine plant) utilizing rapidly cycled adsorbent beds. The present techniques integrate rapid cycle swing adsorption processes for a contaminant removal system to lessen the water utilized in the process. The present techniques provide enhancements with a swing adsorption system that also provides several other benefits, such as reduction in footprint, size, weight, costs, energy needs, and fresh water/water treatment needs.
For example, the present techniques may enhance processes for gas treatment with solvent based gas treating system, such as amine systems, fed with a dry gas stream. By way of example, prior gas processing (such as condensate and natural gas liquids (NGL) recovery) typically involves dehydration. As a specific example, the solvent based gas treating system may be an amine process, which receives a dry gas feed stream (the resulting stream from prior processing) and may contain predominately hydrocarbons along with some contaminants (e.g., acid gas, which are streams that comprises CO2 and/or H2S) and less than (<) 10 parts per million volume (ppmv) of H2O. This dry gas stream may also be referred to as the overall facility feed. This overall facility feed stream may be introduced to an amine system to lessen or remove contaminants, such as CO2 and H2S, from the dry gas feed stream. Acid gas removal with an amine solvent typically requires the gas stream to be saturated with water. As a result, the process continuously needs makeup water for continued processing of the gas stream. The resulting sweet gas stream and acid gas stream from the amine process are saturated with water. For these streams, there is a need to dehydrate the streams before introduction into pipelines for sales, liquefaction and/or injection to meet the predetermined specifications. The predetermined specification is dependent upon several factors, such as the ambient conditions, corrosion constraints, and may be as low as 10 ppmv or 1 ppmv.
The present techniques provide a method to remove contaminants from the resulting streams from the solvent based gas treating process, which may be an amine process, to below the specified dehydration levels and transfer the contaminants to the overall facility feed stream entering the solvent based gas treating system or process. The present techniques replace the dehydration systems downstream of a conventional solvent based gas treating process with rapid cycle swing adsorption units. By way of example, the overall facility feed stream, which is a dry gas stream, is divided between a first swing adsorption process and a second swing adsorption process, as the purge stream for the respective swing adsorption processes. These streams remove water from the respective swing adsorption processes. The resulting purge product stream has a higher concentration of water relative to the concentration of water from the feed stream provided to the swing adsorption processes. The purge product streams (e.g., wet gas streams) from the swing adsorption processes are combined and are passed to a solvent based gas treating system (e.g., an amine system) to separate a portion of the acid gas from the remaining stream to form a wet hydrocarbon rich stream and a wet acid gas stream. From the solvent based gas treating system, the wet hydrocarbon rich steam (e.g., a wet sweet gas stream) is passed through the first swing adsorption process to dehydrate the wet hydrocarbon rich steam to levels below the preferred specification, such as pipeline specifications. For example, the pipeline specification may be less than 150 ppmv of H2O, less than 105 ppmv of H2O, less than 30 ppmv of H2O, less than 10 ppmv of H2O, less than 1 ppmv of H2O or less than 0.1 ppmv of H2O. Also, the acid gas stream from the solvent based gas treating system is passed through the second swing adsorption process to dehydrate the acid gas stream to levels below a preferred specification, such as injection specifications. The injection specification may be less than 150 ppmv of H2O, less than 105 ppmv of H2O, less than 30 ppmv of H2O, less than 10 ppmv of H2O, less than 1 ppmv of H2O or less than 0.1 ppmv of H2O. Beneficially, the present techniques may also reduce in footprint, size, weight, costs, energy needs, and fresh water/water treatment needs of the system as compared to conventional systems.
In this configuration, the first swing adsorption process may be performed with a first swing adsorption system that may include various adsorbent bed units, which are configured to operate specific cycles. The first swing adsorption system (e.g., sweet dehydration swing adsorption system) may be used to dehydrate the hydrocarbon rich stream. The cycle may include an adsorption step and a regeneration step (e.g., one or more purge steps), which may also include a blowdown, heating step and/or other repressurization step, as well. For example, the wet hydrocarbon rich stream from the solvent based gas treating system may be provided to the first swing adsorption system as a feed stream to one of the adsorbent bed units in that system, while the portion of the dry gas stream from the gas treatment plant (GTP) system may be provided as the as the purge stream for one or more of the other adsorbent bed units in the system. As the feed stream passes through the adsorbent bed units, moisture is removed from the stream and a dry hydrocarbon rich stream is conducted away from the adsorbent bed units on the product side. The moisture removed from the adsorbent bed units is conducted away by the purge stream during the regeneration step, which results in a wet purge product stream. Thus, the process serves as a pre-saturation step for the stream entering the solvent based gas treating system, which may lessen the make-up water requirements.
The first swing adsorption system may include adsorbent bed units that perform various steps in the cycle to dehydrate the hydrocarbon rich stream. By way of example, the steps may include one or more feed steps, one or more depressurization steps, one or more purge steps, one or more recycle steps, and one or more re-pressurization steps. As a specific example of a cycle, the one or more feed steps may involve passing a wet feed stream through the adsorbent bed, which is provided at a feed pressure, which may be about 70 bar. The one or more depressurization steps may involve passing a stream from the adsorbent bed unit until the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit is at a depressurization pressure, such as about 40 bar. The one or more purge steps may include passing a purge stream, which is a dry gas stream from the overall facility feed stream. The purge stream may contain less than or equal to 3 ppmv of moisture. The dry hydrocarbon rich stream, which is the product stream and may be provided to a pipeline, may contain less than or equal to 0.7 ppmv of moisture. The feed stream for the first swing adsorption system from the solvent based gas treating system may be provided at liquefied natural gas (LNG) specifications (e.g., less than or equal to 50 ppmv CO2). The molar ratio of the purge to feed stream may be about 0.86 for this example.
In certain embodiments, a recycle step may be utilized as the adsorbent bed unit may be full of gas coming from the overall facility feed stream which has a large amount of CO2 and H2S upon completion of the purge step. As the feed stream for the first swing adsorption system from the solvent based gas treating system may be provided at LNG specifications (e.g., less than or equal to 50 ppmv CO2), to ensure the product gas of the swing adsorption system maintains the LNG specification, a sweeping recycle step may be utilized where a portion of the product stream is recycled and passed through the regenerated bed concurrently to sweep out the gas in the adsorbent bed unit and recycle the resulting stream to the solvent based gas treating system. The amount of recycle may be adjusted, and may be less than 0.5% of the total feed to the first swing adsorption system.
Also, the second swing adsorption process may be performed by a second swing adsorption system that may include various adsorbent bed units, which are configured to operate on specific cycles. The cycle may include an adsorption step and a regeneration step (e.g., one or more purge steps), which may also include a blowdown, heating step and/or other repressurization step, as well. For example, the wet acid gas stream from the solvent based gas treating system may be provided to the second swing adsorption system as a feed stream to one of the adsorbent bed units in that system, while the portion of the dry gas stream from the overall facility feed may be provided as the purge stream for one or more of the other adsorbent bed units in the system. As the feed stream passes through the adsorbent bed units, moisture is removed from the stream and a dry acid gas stream is conducted away from the adsorbent bed units on the product side. The moisture removed from the adsorbent bed units is conducted away by the purge stream during the regeneration step, which results in a wet purge product stream. Thus, the process serves as another pre-saturation step for the stream entering the solvent based gas treating system, which may lessen the make-up water requirements.
The second swing adsorption system may include adsorbent bed units that perform various steps in the cycle to dehydrate the acid gas stream. By way of example, the steps may include one or more feed steps, one or more re-pressurization steps, one or more purge steps and/or one or more depressurization steps. The one or more feed steps may include passing the stream from the GTP system at a pressure of about 37 bar, while the one or more re-pressurization steps may include increasing the pressure within the adsorbent bed units to about 40 bar. In the one or more purge steps, the purge stream is the stream from the GTP system, which may be available at less than or equal to 3 ppmv of moisture. The dry product stream (e.g., dry acid gas stream that is provided to injection) may contain less than or equal to 0.8 ppmv of moisture. The molar ratio of purge stream to feed stream may be about 1.8.
Further, various enhancements may be provided in certain embodiments. For example, the purge streams may be heated prior to passing through the swing adsorption systems. The stream may be heated by a heat exchanger, boiler or other suitable configuration. The purge stream temperature may be in the range between 40° F. and 450° F. or in the range between 80° F. and 350° F.
Moreover, the direction of the flow through the respective adsorbent bed units (e.g., through the adsorbent bed) may be concurrent flow, countercurrent flow or cross flow in certain configurations. In certain preferred configurations, the streams may be countercurrent flow. For example, the feed stream may flow from the feed end to the product end of the adsorbent bed, while the purge stream may flow from the product end to the feed end of the adsorbent bed. As another example, the feed stream may flow from the feed end to the product end of the adsorbent bed, while the purge stream may flow from the feed end to the product end of the adsorbent bed. As yet another example, the feed stream may flow from the feed end to the product end of the adsorbent bed, while the purge stream may flow from a first side to a second side of the adsorbent bed.
Beneficially, the use of swing adsorption processes in this configuration reduces or eliminates the heating needs associated dehydration systems (e.g., a tri-ethylene glycol (TEG) and/or molecular sieve dehydration systems). Furthermore, the configurations may be smaller, lighter, and less expensive than conventional TEG and/or mole sieve systems. By way of example, the swing capacity per weight of the swing adsorption system (e.g., adsorbent beds) may be less than conventional TSA molecular sieve dehydration systems, without the requirement for complete drying of the adsorbent bed (e.g., making the quantity of adsorbent required larger), the use of rapid cycles lessens the adsorbent quantity as compared to conventional TSA molecular sieve dehydration systems in that the required adsorbent quantity is ten to more than one hundred times smaller than conventional TSA molecular sieve dehydration systems. Also, it may not be required that the purge stream passed through the adsorbent bed completely dries the feed end of the respective adsorbent beds.
The present techniques may also include various pressures for the feed stream and the purge stream. For example, the feed pressure may be based on the preferred adsorption feed pressure, which may be in the range between 400 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) and 2,200 psia, or in the range between 500 psia and 1,200 psia for the hydrocarbon dehydration system. In particular, the pressures for the streams within the acid gas swing adsorption system may be in the range between 100 psia and 2,200 psia, or more preferably in the range between 300 psia and 2,000 psia. Also, the purge pressure may be based on the overall facility inlet feed gas pressure, which may be in the range between 400 psia and 1400 psia, or in the range between 600 psia and 1200 psia.
As another enhancement, the present techniques may provide dehydration through the use of a rapid cycle swing adsorption process, such as a rapid cycle PSA process or a rapid cycle pressure and temperature swing adsorption (PTSA) process. As noted above, the swing capacity per weight of the adsorbent bed may be less than conventional molecular sieve dehydration. Without the requirement to completely dry of the adsorbent bed, less adsorbent is utilized as compared to conventional molecular sieve dehydration process.
In the present techniques, the product end of the adsorbent bed is maintained nearly dry (e.g., the water loading for the region near the product end is less than 1 mole per kilogram (mol/kg), is less than 0.5 mol/kg, or is less than 0.1 mol/kg), but is it is not essential to fully dry the feed end of the adsorbent bed. The feed end or feed side is the portion of the adsorbent bed that the feed stream initially enters, while the product end is the portion of the adsorbent bed opposite from the feed end and where the feed stream exits the adsorbent bed. The loading level of water may be lower on the feed side of the adsorbent bed during the purge step, but the length of adsorbent bed that contains water may be reduced during the purge step. For example, an adsorbate loaded region may be a specific portion of the adsorbent bed from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to 10% of the bed length, from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to 40% of the bed length or from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to 75% of the bed length. Utilizing only a portion of the bed length provides that the product end of the bed remains rigorously dry and enables extremely low product water concentrations. Further, maintaining a significant portion of the product end of the bed dry provides flexibility for non-uniformity of gas passage channels in embodiments where a structured adsorbent, such as a monolith, is used for the adsorbent bed or adsorber structure. The product region may be a specific portion of the adsorbent bed from the product end of the adsorbent bed to 10% of the bed length, from the product end of the adsorbent bed to 25% of the bed length or from the product end of the adsorbent bed to 40% of the bed length. The difference between the total adsorbent bed water loading during the purge step and during the adsorption step is the basis of the swing capacity of the process.
In one or more embodiments, the present techniques can be used for any type of swing adsorption process. Non-limiting swing adsorption processes for which the present techniques may include pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum pressure swing adsorption (VPSA), temperature swing adsorption (TSA), partial pressure swing adsorption (PPSA), rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption (RCPSA), rapid cycle thermal swing adsorption (RCTSA), rapid cycle partial pressure swing adsorption (RCPPSA), as well as combinations of these processes, such as pressure and/or temperature swing adsorption. Exemplary kinetic swing adsorption processes are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2008/0282892, 2008/0282887, 2008/0282886, 2008/0282885, 2008/0282884 and 2014/0013955, which are each herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Adsorptive separation processes, apparatus, and systems, as described above, are useful for development and production of hydrocarbons, such as gas and oil processing. Particularly, the provided processes, apparatus, and systems are useful for the rapid, large scale, efficient separation of a variety of target gases from gas mixtures. In particular, the processes, apparatus, and systems may be used to prepare feed products (e.g., natural gas products) by removing contaminants and heavy hydrocarbons (e.g., hydrocarbons having at least two carbon atoms). The provided processes, apparatus, and systems are useful for preparing gaseous feed streams for use in utilities, including separation applications. The separation applications may include dew point control; sweetening and/or detoxification; corrosion protection and/or control; dehydration; heating value; conditioning; and/or purification. Examples of utilities that utilize one or more separation applications include generation of fuel gas; seal gas; non-potable water; blanket gas; instrument and control gas; refrigerant; inert gas; and/or hydrocarbon recovery.
In certain embodiments, the present techniques may be used to remove contaminants from feed streams, such as acid gas from hydrocarbon streams. Acid gas removal technology may be useful for gas reserves exhibiting higher concentrations of acid gas (e.g., sour gas resources). Hydrocarbon feed streams vary widely in amount of acid gas, such as from several parts per million acid gas to 90 volume percent (vol. %) acid gas. Non-limiting examples of acid gas concentrations from exemplary gas reserves include concentrations of at least: (a) 1 vol. % H2S, 5 vol. % CO2, (b) 1 vol. % H2S, 15 vol. % CO2, (c) 1 vol. % H2S, 60 vol. % CO2, (d) 15 vol. % H2S, 15 vol. % CO2, and (e) 15 vol. % H2S, 30 vol. % CO2. Accordingly, the present techniques may include equipment to remove various contaminants, such as H2S, CO2 or heavy hydrocarbons, such as Benzene, Toluene and Xylene, to desired levels.
In certain embodiments, the gaseous feed stream may predominately comprise hydrocarbons alone with one or more contaminants. For example, the gaseous feed stream may be a hydrocarbon containing stream having greater than one volume percent hydrocarbons based on the total volume of the feed stream. Further, the gaseous feed stream may include hydrocarbons and H2O, wherein the H2O is one of the one or more contaminants and the gaseous feed stream comprises H2O in the range of 50 parts per million (ppm) molar to 1,500 ppm molar; or in the range of 500 ppm molar to 1,500 ppm molar. Moreover, the gaseous feed stream may include hydrocarbons and H2O, wherein the H2O is one of the one or more contaminants and the gaseous feed stream comprises H2O in the range of two ppm molar to saturation levels in the gaseous feed stream.
In other embodiments, the present techniques may be used to lessen the water content of the stream to a specific level by the swing adsorption process. The specific level may be related to dew point of desired output product (e.g., the water content should be lower than the water content required to obtain a dew point below the lowest temperature of the stream in subsequent process and is related to the feed pressure).
In one or more embodiment, the present techniques may be used as an integration of a rapid cycle swing adsorption process for removal of contaminants from a feed stream. For example, the configuration may include CO2 removal, which may be limited to less than the pipeline specifications. In particular, as the gaseous feed stream may include hydrocarbons and one or more contaminants, such as CO2.
Further, in one or more embodiments, the present techniques may include a specific process flow to remove contaminants, such as water (H2O). For example, the process may include an adsorbent step and a regeneration step, which form the cycle. The adsorbent step may include passing a gaseous feed stream at a feed pressure and feed temperature through an adsorbent bed unit to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream. The feed stream may be passed through the adsorbent bed in a forward direction (e.g., from the feed end of the adsorbent bed to the product end of the adsorbent bed). Then, the flow of the gaseous feed stream may be interrupted for a regeneration step. The regeneration step may include one or more depressurization steps, one or more purge steps and/or one or more re-pressurization steps. The depressurization steps may include reducing the pressure of the adsorbent bed unit by a predetermined amount for each successive depressurization step, which may be a single step and/or may be a blowdown step. The depressurization step may be provided in a forward direction or may preferably be provided in a countercurrent direction (e.g., from the product end of the adsorbent bed to the feed end of the adsorbent bed). The purge step may include passing a purge stream into the adsorbent bed unit, which may be a once through purge step and the purge stream may be provided in countercurrent flow relative to the feed stream. The output stream from the purge step may be conducted away to a solvent based gas treating system, such as an amine system. Then, the one or more re-pressurization steps may be performed, wherein the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit is increased with each re-pressurization step by a predetermined amount with each successive re-pressurization step. Then, the cycle may be repeated for additional streams. The cycle duration may be for a period greater than 1 second and less than 600 seconds, for a period greater than 2 seconds and less than 300 seconds, for a period greater than 2 seconds and less than 200 seconds, or for a period greater than 2 seconds and less than 90 seconds.
In certain configurations, a cyclical swing adsorption process for removing contaminants from a feed stream is described. The cyclical swing adsorption process comprises: a) performing one or more adsorption steps, wherein each of the adsorption steps comprises passing a feed stream from an solvent based gas treating system through a swing adsorption system to remove one or more contaminants from the feed stream and to form a product stream; b) performing one or more purge steps, wherein each of the purge steps comprises passing a purge stream through the swing adsorption system in a counter flow direction relative to the flow of the feed stream to form a purge product stream, wherein the purge product stream is passed to the solvent based gas treating system; and c) repeating the steps a) to b) for at least one additional cycle.
In other embodiments, the cyclical swing adsorption process may include other enhancements. The enhancements may include: wherein the solvent based gas treating system separates one or more contaminants from the purge product stream to form a wet hydrocarbon rich stream and a wet acid gas stream; wherein performing one or more adsorption steps comprises passing the wet hydrocarbon rich stream as the feed stream from the solvent based gas treating system through the adsorbent bed unit to remove water from the wet hydrocarbon rich stream and to form a dry hydrocarbon rich stream as the product stream; wherein the cycle duration is greater than 1 second and less than 600 seconds; wherein the feed stream is a hydrocarbon containing stream having greater than one volume percent hydrocarbons based on the total volume of the feed stream; wherein the feed pressure is in the range between 400 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) and 1,400 psia; wherein the cycle duration is greater than 2 seconds and less than 300 seconds; and/or wherein the cyclical swing adsorption process is a cyclical rapid cycle swing adsorption process. Also, other enhancements may include: i) performing one or more acid gas adsorption steps, wherein each of the acid gas adsorption steps comprises passing the wet acid gas stream from the solvent based gas treating system through a second swing adsorption system to remove one or more contaminants from the wet acid gas stream and to form a dry acid gas stream, ii) performing one or more acid gas purge steps, wherein each of the acid gas purge steps comprises passing the feed stream through the second swing adsorption system in a counter flow direction relative to the flow of the wet acid gas stream to form an acid gas purge product stream, wherein the acid gas purge product stream is passed to the solvent based gas treating system, and iii) repeating the steps i) to ii) for at least one additional cycle; wherein greater than 95 volume % of the acid gas in the purge stream is recycled to the second swing adsorption system from the solvent based gas treating system in the wet acid gas stream; and/or wherein greater than 95 volume % of the hydrocarbons in the purge stream are recycled to the swing adsorption system from the solvent based gas treating system in the feed stream.
In another embodiment, a system for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream, the system comprising: a swing adsorption system configured to receive a facility feed stream and to pass at least a first portion of the facility feed stream though a first plurality of swing adsorption bed units, wherein each of the first plurality of swing adsorption bed units are configured to perform a first swing adsorption process to remove water from the each of the first plurality of swing adsorption bed units during a purge step and form a first purge product stream; an solvent based gas treating system in fluid communication with the swing adsorption system and configured to separate one or more contaminants from the purge product stream to form a feed stream and an acid gas stream and to pass the feed stream from the solvent based gas treating system to the swing adsorption system.
In other embodiments, the cyclical swing adsorption process may include other enhancements. The enhancements may include: wherein the swing adsorption system is configured to adsorb the water from the feed stream in one of the first plurality of swing adsorption bed units to form the first product stream; a splitter unit configured to divide the facility feed stream into the at least a first portion of the overall facility feed stream; wherein the splitter unit is further configured to divide the facility feed stream into a second portion of the facility feed stream and the swing adsorption system further comprises a second plurality of swing adsorption bed units, wherein each of the second plurality of swing adsorption bed units is configured to perform a second swing adsorption process to remove water from the each of the second plurality of swing adsorption bed units by passing the second portion of the facility feed stream through the each of the second plurality of swing adsorption bed units to form a second purge product stream and remove water from the acid gas stream in each of the second plurality of swing adsorption bed units by passing the acid gas stream through the each of the second plurality of swing adsorption bed units to form a second product stream; wherein the swing adsorption system is configured to combine the second purge product stream with the purge product stream upstream of the amine system; wherein the swing adsorption system is configured to adsorb the water from the acid gas stream in one of the second plurality of swing adsorption bed units to form the second product stream; wherein the second product stream comprises predominately acid gas; wherein the second product stream is passed to injection equipment and/or wherein the first product stream comprises predominately hydrocarbons. The present techniques may be further understood with reference to the
In this system, the adsorbent bed units, such as adsorbent bed unit 102, may be configured for a cyclical swing adsorption process for removing contaminants from feed streams (e.g., fluids, gaseous or liquids). For example, the adsorbent bed unit 102 may include various conduits, such as conduit 104, for managing the flow of fluids through, to or from the adsorbent bed within the adsorbent bed unit 102. These conduits from the adsorbent bed units 102 may be coupled to a manifold, such as manifold 106, to distribute the flow of the stream to, from or between components. The adsorbent bed within an adsorbent bed unit may separate one or more contaminants from the feed stream to form a product stream. As may be appreciated, the adsorbent bed units may include other conduits to control other fluid steams as part of the process, such as purge streams, depressurizations streams, and the like. Further, the adsorbent bed unit may also include one or more equalization vessels, such as equalization vessel 108, which are dedicated to the adsorbent bed unit and may be dedicated to one or more step in the swing adsorption process.
As an example, which is discussed further below in
The adsorbent bed comprises a solid adsorbent material capable of adsorbing one or more components from the feed stream. Such solid adsorbent materials are selected to be durable against the physical and chemical conditions within the adsorbent bed unit 102 and can include metallic, ceramic, or other materials, depending on the adsorption process. Further examples of adsorbent materials are noted further below.
The upper head 218 and lower head 220 contain openings in which valve structures can be inserted, such as valve assemblies 222 to 240, respectively (e.g., poppet valves). The upper or lower open flow path volume between the respective head 218 or 220 and adsorbent bed 210 can also contain distribution lines (not shown) which directly introduce fluids into the adsorbent bed 210. The upper head 218 contains various openings (not show) to provide flow passages through the inlet manifolds 242 and 244 and the outlet manifolds 248, 250 and 252, while the lower head 220 contains various openings (not shown) to provide flow passages through the inlet manifold 254 and the outlet manifolds 256, 258 and 260. Disposed in fluid communication with the respective manifolds 242 to 260 are the valve assemblies 222 to 240. If the valve assemblies 222 to 240 are poppet valves, each may include a disk element connected to a stem element which can be positioned within a bushing or valve guide. The stem element may be connected to an actuating means, such as actuating means (not shown), which is configured to have the respective valve impart linear motion to the respective stem. As may be appreciated, the actuating means may be operated independently for different steps in the process to activate a single valve or a single actuating means may be utilized to control two or more valves. Further, while the openings may be substantially similar in size, the openings and inlet valves for inlet manifolds may have a smaller diameter than those for outlet manifolds, given that the gas volumes passing through the inlets may tend to be lower than product volumes passing through the outlets. Further, while this configuration has valve assemblies 222 to 240, the number and operation of the valves may vary (e.g., the number of valves) based on the specific cycle being performed.
In swing adsorption processes, the cycle involves two or more steps that each has a certain time interval, which are summed together to be the cycle time. These steps include the regeneration step of the adsorbent bed following the adsorption step or feed step using a variety of methods including pressure swing, vacuum swing, temperature swing, purging (via any suitable type of purge fluid for the process), and combinations thereof. As an example, a swing adsorption cycle may include the steps of adsorption, depressurization, purging, and re-pressurization. When performing the separation at high pressure, depressurization and re-pressurization, which may be referred to as equalization steps, are performed in multiple steps to reduce the pressure change for each step and enhance efficiency. In some swing adsorption processes, such as rapid cycle swing adsorption processes, a substantial portion of the total cycle time is involved in the regeneration of the adsorbent bed. Accordingly, any reductions in the amount of time for regeneration results in a reduction of the total cycle time. This reduction may also reduce the overall size of the swing adsorption system.
As noted above, conventional systems for dehydration is typically accomplished using molecular sieve adsorption processes and TEG processes. The conventional systems (e.g., molecular sieve units) are very large (e.g., are a large footprint and involve more adsorbent than the present techniques). In addition, the conventional approaches maintain a narrow mass transfer zone, or sharp adsorption front to maximize bed utilization, while maintaining rigorous dehydration. A schematic diagram of a conventional adsorption system having an amine system, a molecular sieve system and a TEG system is shown below in
The molecular sieve system 304 receives the resulting compressed saturated hydrocarbon rich stream and is configured to dehydrate the stream in a molecular sieve units, such as molecular sieve unit 320. The molecular sieve system 304 may involve one or more molecular sieve units that perform an adsorption step and a regeneration step in processing the input stream to remove water from the steam. The adsorption step separates contaminants, such as water from the stream, by adsorbing the water into the adsorbent material within the respective molecular sieve units. The dry hydrocarbon rich stream is passed from the molecular sieve unit 320 via conduit 322. The regeneration step may use temperature to remove all of the contaminants, such as water from the adsorbent material, by heating the adsorbent material within the respective molecular sieve units. A portion of the dry hydrocarbon rich stream is passed to a heat exchanger 324 and then recycled to the molecular sieve unit 320, while the remaining portion of the dry hydrocarbon rich stream is passed via conduit 326. The remaining portion of the dry hydrocarbon rich stream may be passed to a pipeline or storage tank. The portion of hydrocarbon rich stream recycled to the molecular sieve unit is used to remove contaminants, such as water from the adsorbent material. The resulting wet gas stream may be compressed in booster compressor 330, and cooled to knockout contaminant water in water knockout system 332. The resulting hydrocarbon stream is recycled to conduit 314. While a representative adsorption dehydration system is described herein, a TEG dehydration system may also be used to dehydrate the gas stream in conduit 314.
The TEG system 306 receives the saturated or wet sour gas stream and is configured to dehydrate the stream in the TEG system 306. The dry acid gas stream is passed from the TEG system 306 via conduit 307. The dry acid gas stream may be passed to injection equipment, acid gas storage tanks, or subsequent treatment systems.
In contrast to the conventional system, the present techniques provide a configuration to dehydrate the hydrocarbon and acid gas streams, lessen the water usage and remove contaminants in an enhanced manner. The present techniques may lessen footprint, size, weight, costs, energy needs, additional equipment and fresh water/water treatment needs by utilizing swing adsorption processes. In the present techniques, the two dehydration systems, such as the molecular sieve system 304 and TEG system 306 of
By way of example, the configuration may include two swing adsorption systems to replace conventional dehydration systems. For a first or sweet swing adsorption system, a wet hydrocarbon rich stream is utilized as the feed stream for an adsorption step in this swing adsorption system, while a portion of a dry overall facility feed stream, is utilized in the regeneration step as a purge stream in the first swing adsorption system. As the feed stream (e.g., wet hydrocarbon rich stream) moves through the respective adsorbent beds in the first swing adsorption system, moisture is removed from this stream and a dry hydrocarbon rich stream exits the adsorbent beds on the product side. In the regeneration step, the moisture is removed from the adsorbent bed and is conducted away by the purge stream (e.g., dry overall facility feed stream), which in turn results a wet purge product that is passed to the amine system. This process, thus, serves as a pre-saturation step for the gas stream entering the amine process, thereby reducing the makeup water requirements.
A similar configuration may be utilized for a second or acid gas swing adsorption system. For the second swing adsorption system, a wet acid gas stream is utilized as the feed stream for an adsorption step in this swing adsorption system, while a portion of a dry overall facility feed stream, is utilized in the regeneration step as a purge stream in the second swing adsorption system. As the feed stream (e.g., wet acid gas stream) moves through the respective adsorbent beds in the second swing adsorption system, moisture is removed from this stream and a dry acid gas stream exits the adsorbent beds on the product side. In the regeneration step, the moisture is removed from the adsorbent bed and is conducted away by the purge stream (e.g., dry overall facility feed stream), which in turn results a wet purge product that is passed to the amine system. This process thus serves as another pre-saturation step for the other portion of the gas stream entering the amine process, thereby reducing the makeup water requirements. Beneficially, the use of the swing adsorption systems for dehydration reduces or eliminates the heating needs associated with TEG and/or molecular sieve dehydration systems. Furthermore, the configurations utilizing the swing adsorption systems may be smaller, lighter, and therefore less expensive as compared with conventional TEG or molecular sieve units.
As an example of these enhancements,
In the configuration, the swing adsorption system 402 may include a hydrocarbon swing adsorption system 412 and an acid gas swing adsorption system 414. Each of the swing adsorption systems 412 and 414 may include one or more adsorbent bed units, such as the adsorbent beds units discussed in
In the swing adsorption system 402, each of the adsorbent bed units are utilized to perform an adsorption step (e.g., a feed step) and a regeneration step in processing the input stream into a wet stream as part of the cycle. The process begins with an input feed stream passing through the conduit 308 to a splitter unit 406 that is configured to pass a portion of the input feed stream in conduit 308 to the respective swing adsorption systems 412 and 414 during a purge step. From the splitter unit 406, a first portion of the input feed stream is passed to a heater unit 410 and then to one or more of the adsorbent bed units in the hydrocarbon swing adsorption system 412, while a second portion of the input feed stream is passed to a heater unit 408 and then to one or more of the adsorbent bed units in the hydrocarbon swing adsorption system 414. The purge product stream is passed from the hydrocarbon swing adsorption system 412 and the acid gas swing adsorption system 414. The combined purge product streams are passed to the amine unit 310 in the amine system 404.
In the amine system 404, the combined purge product streams are separated into a hydrocarbon rich stream and an acid gas stream. The hydrocarbon rich stream may be passed via conduit 416 to the hydrocarbon swing adsorption system 412 for the adsorption step in these units. Also, the acid gas stream may be passed to the compression unit 316 configured to compress the saturated or wet acid gas stream. The compressed acid gas stream is passed via conduit 318 to the acid gas swing adsorption system 414 for the adsorption step in these absorbent bed units.
From the amine system 404, the different streams are used as the feed stream in the respective swing adsorption systems 412 and 414 in the adsorption step. The wet hydrocarbon rich stream is passed through the hydrocarbon swing adsorption system 412 to remove moisture, which is adsorbed into the adsorbent material. The dry hydrocarbon rich stream is passed from the hydrocarbon swing adsorption system 412 via conduit 418 to a pipeline compression unit 420. The pipeline compression unit 420 is configured to increase the pressure of the dry hydrocarbon rich stream to a pipeline pressure. The compressed dry hydrocarbon rich stream is passed via conduit 422 to a storage vessel or a pipeline. Similarly, the wet acid gas stream is passed through the acid gas swing adsorption system 414 to remove moisture, which is adsorbed into the adsorbent material. The dry acid gas stream is passed from the acid gas swing adsorption system 414 via conduit 430 to an injection unit 432. The injection unit 432 may be configured to increase the pressure of the dry acid gas stream to an injection pressure (e.g., as an injection compressor or compression unit) and/or may be configured to increase the density of the dry acid gas stream (e.g., an injection condenser). The compressed dry acid gas stream is passed via conduit 434 to a storage vessel or injection equipment.
By way of example, for the acid gas swing adsorption system, the process for each of the adsorbent bed units in the acid gas swing adsorption system 414 may include a feed step at a feed pressure, which may be about 37 bar, a re-pressurization step to increase the pressure to a re-pressurization pressure, which may be about 40 bar, a purge step and a depressurization step. With a purge stream available at 3 ppmv of moisture, a dry product stream (to injection) containing 0.8 ppmv may be achieved. The molar ratio of purge to feed stream is 1.8. The purge stream may also be heated.
Beneficially, this configuration may remove any additional heat exchanger or furnace from the process flow. Further, the enhancements of the present techniques are further illustrated by comparing the two processes. For example, the system may recycle 40 million pounds of water per million standard cubic feet of overall facility feed gas, while the conventional system does not recycle water. In addition, the footprint, weight and size of the configuration under the present techniques may be enhanced as compared to the conventional system.
In various configurations, swing adsorption system 402 and amine system 404 may process the majority of the overall facility feed stream. For example, the overall facility feed stream is passed to the swing adsorption system 402 to remove contaminants from the adsorbent materials, then the purge product is processed in the amine system 404. The output streams from the amine system 404 are passed to the swing adsorption system 402 to remove water from the respective streams, by adsorbing the water into the adsorbent beds. Accordingly, greater than 90 volume % of the acid gas in the purge stream, greater than 95 volume % of the acid gas in the purge stream or greater than 98 volume % of the acid gas in the purge stream is recycled to the swing adsorption system from the amine system in the wet acid gas stream. Similarly, greater than 90 volume % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream, greater than 95 volume % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream or greater than 98 volume % of the hydrocarbons in the feed stream is recycled to the swing adsorption system from the amine system in the wet feed stream. Further, greater than 90 volume % of the facility feed stream, greater than 95 volume % of the facility feed stream or greater than 98 volume % of the facility feed stream that is passed to the swing adsorption system and the amine system is outputted from the swing adsorption system and amine system as a dry acid gas stream and a dry hydrocarbon stream.
In one or more embodiments, the material may include an adsorbent material supported on a non-adsorbent support. Non-limiting examples of adsorbent materials may include alumina, microporous zeolites, carbons, cationic zeolites, high silica zeolites, highly siliceous ordered mesoporous materials, sol gel materials, aluminum phosphorous and oxygen (ALPO) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials containing predominantly aluminum phosphorous and oxygen), silicon aluminum phosphorous and oxygen (SAPO) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials containing predominantly silicon aluminum phosphorous and oxygen), metal organic framework (MOF) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials comprised of a metal organic framework) and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials comprised of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks). Other materials include microporous and mesoporous sorbents functionalized with functional groups. Examples of functional groups, which may be used for CO2 removal, may include primary, secondary, tertiary amines and other non protogenic basic groups such as amidines, guanidines and biguanides.
Further, in one or more embodiments, the adsorbent bed unit may include an adsorbent bed that can be used for the separation of a target gas from a gaseous mixture. The adsorbent is usually comprised of an adsorbent material supported on a non-adsorbent support, or contactor. Such contactors contain substantially parallel flow channels wherein 20 volume percent, preferably 15 volume percent or less of the open pore volume of the contactor, excluding the flow channels, is in pores greater than about 20 angstroms. A flow channel is taken to be that portion of the contactor in which gas flows, if a steady state pressure difference is applied between the points or places at which a feed stream enters the contactor and the point or place at which a product stream leaves the contactor. In the contactor, the adsorbent is incorporated into the wall of the flow channel.
In one or more embodiments, the rapid cycle swing adsorption process in the present techniques is a rapid cycle temperature swing adsorption (RCTSA) and a pressure swing adsorption (RCPSA) or a rapid cycle pressure and temperature swing adsorption process (RCPTSA). For example, the total cycle times are typically less than 600 seconds, less than 300 seconds, preferably less than 200 seconds, more preferably less than 90 seconds, and even more preferably less than 60 seconds.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrative embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention.
This is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/670,768, filed Aug. 7, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/381,838, filed Aug. 31, 2016, entitled APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR SWING ADSORPTION PROCESSES RELATED THERETO, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1868138 | Fisk | Jul 1932 | A |
3103425 | Meyer | Sep 1963 | A |
3124152 | Payne | Mar 1964 | A |
3142547 | Marsh et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3508758 | Strub | Apr 1970 | A |
3594983 | Yearout | Jul 1971 | A |
3602247 | Bunn et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3788036 | Lee et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3967464 | Cormier et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4187092 | Woolley | Feb 1980 | A |
4261815 | Kelland | Apr 1981 | A |
4324565 | Benkmann | Apr 1982 | A |
4325565 | Winchell | Apr 1982 | A |
4329162 | Pitcher, Jr. | May 1982 | A |
4340398 | Doshi et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4386947 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4421531 | Dalton, Jr. et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4445441 | Tanca | May 1984 | A |
4461630 | Cassidy et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4496376 | Hradek | Jan 1985 | A |
4631073 | Null et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4693730 | Miller et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4705627 | Miwa et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4711968 | Oswald et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4737170 | Searle | Apr 1988 | A |
4770676 | Sircar et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4783205 | Searle | Nov 1988 | A |
4784672 | Sircar | Nov 1988 | A |
4790272 | Woolenweber | Dec 1988 | A |
4814146 | Brand et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816039 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4877429 | Hunter | Oct 1989 | A |
4977745 | Heichberger | Dec 1990 | A |
5110328 | Yokota et al. | May 1992 | A |
5125934 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5169006 | Stelzer | Dec 1992 | A |
5174796 | Davis et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5224350 | Mehra | Jul 1993 | A |
5234472 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5292990 | Kantner et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306331 | Auvil et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5354346 | Kumar | Oct 1994 | A |
5365011 | Ramachandran et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370728 | Lasala et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5486227 | Kumar et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5547641 | Smith et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5565018 | Baksh et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5672196 | Acharya et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5700310 | Bowman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5733451 | Coellner et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735938 | Baksh et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5750026 | Gadkaree et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769928 | Leavitt | Jun 1998 | A |
5779768 | Anand et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792239 | Reinhold, III et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807423 | Lemcoff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811616 | Holub et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827358 | Kulish et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5882380 | Sircar | Mar 1999 | A |
5906673 | Reinhold, III et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912426 | Smolarek et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914294 | Park et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924307 | Nenov | Jul 1999 | A |
5935444 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968234 | Midgett, II et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976221 | Bowman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997617 | Czabala et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007606 | Baksh et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011192 | Baker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023942 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053966 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063161 | Keefer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6096115 | Kleinberg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099621 | Ho | Aug 2000 | A |
6102985 | Naheiri et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129780 | Millet et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136222 | Friesen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147126 | DeGeorge et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152991 | Ackley | Nov 2000 | A |
6156101 | Naheiri | Dec 2000 | A |
6171371 | Derive et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176897 | Keefer | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179900 | Behling et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183538 | Naheiri | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194079 | Hekal | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210466 | Whysall et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231302 | Bonardi | May 2001 | B1 |
6245127 | Kane et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6284021 | Lu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311719 | Hill et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345954 | Al-Himyary et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6398853 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402813 | Monereau et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6406523 | Connor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425938 | Xu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432379 | Heung | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436171 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444012 | Dolan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444014 | Mullhaupt et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444523 | Fan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444610 | Yamamoto | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451095 | Keefer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457485 | Hill et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6458187 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464761 | Bugli | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471749 | Kawai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471939 | Boix et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488747 | Keefer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497750 | Butwell et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500234 | Ackley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500241 | Reddy | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500404 | Camblor Fernandez et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503299 | Baksh et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506351 | Jain et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514318 | Keefer | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6514319 | Keefer et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517609 | Monereau et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531516 | Davis et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533846 | Keefer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6565627 | Golden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565635 | Keefer et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565825 | Ohji et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6572678 | Wijmans et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579341 | Baker et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593541 | Herren | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595233 | Pulli | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605136 | Graham et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607584 | Moreau et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6630012 | Wegeng et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6631626 | Hahn | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641645 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651645 | Nunez-Suarez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660064 | Golden et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660065 | Byrd et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6692626 | Keefer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712087 | Hill et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742507 | Connor et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746515 | Wegeng et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752852 | Jacksier et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770120 | Neu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773225 | Yuri et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802889 | Graham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814771 | Scardino et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835354 | Woods et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840985 | Keefer | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866950 | Connor et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889710 | Wagner | May 2005 | B2 |
6890376 | Arquin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893483 | Golden et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902602 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916358 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918953 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921597 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6974496 | Wegeng et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7025801 | Monereau | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027929 | Wang | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029521 | Johansson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7074323 | Ghijsen | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077891 | Jaffe et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087331 | Keefer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094275 | Keefer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097925 | Keefer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112239 | Kimbara et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117669 | Kaboord et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122073 | Notaro et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7128775 | Celik et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144016 | Gozdawa | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160356 | Koros et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160367 | Babicki et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166149 | Dunne et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172645 | Pfister et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7189280 | Alizadeh-Khiavi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7243679 | Thelen | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250073 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250074 | Tonkovich et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255727 | Monereau et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258725 | Ohmi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276107 | Baksh et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279029 | Occhialini et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285350 | Keefer et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297279 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311763 | Neary | Dec 2007 | B2 |
RE40006 | Keefer et al. | Jan 2008 | E |
7314503 | Landrum et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7354562 | Ying et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387849 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390350 | Weist, Jr. et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404846 | Golden et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438079 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449049 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456131 | Klett et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510601 | Whitley et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527670 | Ackley et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553568 | Keefer | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578864 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7604682 | Seaton | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7637989 | Bong | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641716 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7645324 | Rode et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651549 | Whitley | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7674319 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7674539 | Keefer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687044 | Keefer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7713333 | Rege et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717981 | Labuda et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722700 | Sprinkle | May 2010 | B2 |
7731782 | Kelley et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740687 | Reinhold, III | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744676 | Leitmayr et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744677 | Barclay et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758051 | Roberts-Haritonov et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758988 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763098 | Alizadeh-Khiavi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763099 | Verma et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792983 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7793675 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806965 | Stinson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819948 | Wagner | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828877 | Sawada et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828880 | Moriya et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854793 | Rarig et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7858169 | Yamashita | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862645 | Whitley et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867320 | Baksh et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7902114 | Keefer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7938886 | Hershkowitz et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947118 | Rarig et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947120 | Deckman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7959720 | Deckman et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016918 | Labuda et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034164 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8071063 | Reyes et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8128734 | Song | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142745 | Reyes et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142746 | Reyes et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8192709 | Reyes et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210772 | Gillecriosd | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227121 | Adams et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8262773 | Northrop et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8262783 | Stoner et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268043 | Celik et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268044 | Wright et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272401 | McLean | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287629 | Fujita et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319090 | Kitamura | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8337594 | Corma Canos et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8361200 | Sayari et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361205 | Desai et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377173 | Chuang | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8444750 | Deckman et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449649 | Greenough | May 2013 | B2 |
8470395 | Khiavi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480795 | Siskin et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8512569 | Eaton et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518356 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529662 | Kelley et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529663 | Reyes et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529664 | Deckman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529665 | Manning et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535414 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545602 | Chance et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551444 | Agnihotri et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573124 | Havran et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591627 | Jain | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591634 | Winchester et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8616233 | McLean et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8657922 | Yamawaki et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8673059 | Leta et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8680344 | Weston et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8715617 | Genkin et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8752390 | Wright et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8753428 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8778051 | Weist, Jr. et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784533 | Leta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784534 | Kamakoti et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784535 | Ravikovitch et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790618 | Adams et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795411 | Hufton et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808425 | Genkin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808426 | Sundaram | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814985 | Gerds et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852322 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8858683 | Deckman | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875483 | Wettstein | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8906138 | Rasmussen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8921637 | Sundaram et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8939014 | Kamakoti et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9005561 | Leta et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9017457 | Tammera | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9028595 | Sundaram et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9034078 | Wanni et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9034079 | Deckman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9050553 | Alizadeh-Khiavi et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9067168 | Frederick et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9067169 | Patel | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9095809 | Deckman et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9108145 | Kalbassi et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9120049 | Sundaram et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9126138 | Deckman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9162175 | Sundaram | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168483 | Ravikovitch et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168485 | Deckman et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9272264 | Coupland | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9278338 | Coupland | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9358493 | Tammera et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9573116 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9597655 | Beeckman et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9737846 | Carstensen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744521 | Brody et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10040022 | Fowler et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10080991 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10080992 | Nagavarapu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10124286 | McMahon et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20010047824 | Hill et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020053547 | Schlegel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020124885 | Hill et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162452 | Butwell et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030075485 | Ghijsen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030129101 | Zettel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131728 | Kanazirev et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145726 | Gueret et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030170527 | Finn et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188635 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202918 | Ashida et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205130 | Neu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223856 | Yuri et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040099142 | Arquin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040118277 | Kim et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118747 | Cutler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040197596 | Connor et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040232622 | Gozdawa | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050014511 | Spain | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050045041 | Hechinger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050109419 | Ohmi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114032 | Wang | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129952 | Sawada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145111 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050150378 | Dunne et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050229782 | Monereau et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252378 | Celik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017940 | Takayama | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060048648 | Gibbs et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049102 | Miller et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076270 | Poshusta et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099096 | Shaffer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105158 | Fritz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116430 | Wentink et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116460 | Georget et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060162556 | Ackley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165574 | Sayari | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169142 | Rode et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060236862 | Golden et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070006732 | Mitariten | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070084241 | Kretchmer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070084344 | Moriya et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070222160 | Roberts-Haritonov et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253872 | Keefer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261550 | Ota | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261557 | Gadkaree et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283807 | Whitley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080051279 | Klett et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072822 | White | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080128655 | Garg et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080202336 | Hofer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080282883 | Rarig et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282884 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282885 | Deckman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282886 | Reyes et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282887 | Chance et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282892 | Deckman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289497 | Barclay et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307966 | Stinson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314550 | Greco | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090004073 | Gleize et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014902 | Koivunen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025553 | Keefer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025555 | Lively et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037550 | Mishra et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090071333 | LaBuda et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079870 | Matsui | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090107332 | Wagner | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151559 | Verma et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162268 | Hufton et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180423 | Kroener | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241771 | Manning et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284013 | Anand et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294366 | Wright et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090308248 | Siskin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314159 | Haggerty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100059701 | McLean | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077920 | Baksh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089241 | Stoner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100186445 | Minta et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212493 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100251887 | Jain | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100252497 | Ellison et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100263534 | Chuang | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100282593 | Speirs et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288704 | Amsden et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110011803 | Koros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020202 | Gadkaree et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031103 | Deckman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110067440 | Van Aken | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067770 | Pederson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110123878 | Jangbarwala | May 2011 | A1 |
20110146494 | Desai et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110217218 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110277620 | Havran et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291051 | Hershkowitz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296871 | Van Soest-Vercammen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308524 | Brey et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120024150 | Moniot | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120024152 | Yamawaki et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031144 | Northrop et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120067216 | Corma Canos et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152115 | Gerds et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120222551 | Deckman | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222552 | Ravikovitch et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222553 | Kamakoti et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222554 | Leta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222555 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255377 | Kamakoti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272823 | Halder et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308456 | Leta et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120312163 | Leta et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130061755 | Frederick et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130095996 | Buelow et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130225898 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140013955 | Tammera et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140060326 | Sundaram | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140157984 | Deckman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140157986 | Ravikovitch et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140208797 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140216254 | Tammera et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150013377 | Oelfke | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150068397 | Boulet et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150101483 | Perry et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150196870 | Albright et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150328578 | Deckman et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160023155 | Ramkumar et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160129433 | Tammera et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160166972 | Owens et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160236135 | Tammera et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160332105 | Tammera et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160332106 | Tammera et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170056814 | Marshall et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170113173 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170113175 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170136405 | Ravikovitch et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170266604 | Tammera et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170282114 | Owens et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170341011 | Nagavarapu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170341012 | Nagavarapu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180001301 | Brody et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180056229 | Denton et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180056235 | Wang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180169565 | Brody et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180169617 | Brody et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180339263 | Dehaas et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0257493 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0426937 | May 1991 | EP |
0904827 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1674555 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2823872 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2854819 | May 2003 | FR |
2924951 | Jun 2009 | FR |
58-114715 | Jul 1983 | JP |
59-232174 | Dec 1984 | JP |
60-189318 | Dec 1985 | JP |
2002-253818 | Oct 1990 | JP |
04-180978 | Jun 1992 | JP |
06006736 | Jun 1992 | JP |
3477280 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2011-169640 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2011-280921 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-024445 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-348651 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2006-016470 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-036849 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2008-272534 | Nov 2008 | JP |
101349424 | Jan 2014 | KR |
WO2002024309 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO2002073728 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO2005090793 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2010024643 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2011139894 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 16/252,975, filed Jan. 21, 2019, Krishna Nagavarapu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,266, filed Jan. 25, 2019, Barnes et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/263,940, filed Jan. 31, 2019, Johnson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/783,766, filed Dec. 21, 2019, Fulton et al. |
Allen, M. P. et al., (1987) “Computer Simulation of Liquids” Clarendon Press, pp. 156-160. |
Asgari, M. et al., (2014) “Designing a Commercial Scale Pressure Swing Adsorber for Hydrogen Purification” Petroleum & Coal, vol. 56(5), pp. 552-561. |
Baerlocher, C. et al., (2017) International Zeolite Association's “Database of Zeolite Structures,” available at http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/, downloaded Jun. 15, 2018, 1 page. |
Burtch, N.C. et al., (2015) “Molecular-level Insight into Unusual Low Pressure CO2 Affinity in Pillared Metal-Organic Frameworks,” J Am Chem Soc, 135, pp. 7172-7180. |
Beauvais, C. et al., (2004) “Distribution of Sodium Cations in Faujasite-Type Zeolite: A Canonical Parallel Tempering Simulation Study,” J Phys Chem B, 108, pp. 399-404. |
Cheung, O. et al., (2013) “Adsorption kinetics for CO2 on highly selective zeolites NaKA and nano-NaKA,” Appl Energ, 112, pp. 1326-1336. |
Cygan, R. T. et al., (2004) “Molecular Models of Hydroxide, Oxyhydroxide, and Clay Phases and the Development of a General Force Field”, J Phys Chem B, vol. 108, pp. 1255-1266. |
Deem, M. W. et al., (2009) “Computational Discovery of New Zeolite-Like Materials”, J Phys Chem C, 113, pp. 21353-21360. |
Demiralp, E., et al., (1999) “Morse Stretch Potential Charge Equilibrium Force Field for Ceramics: Application to the Quartz-Stishovite Phase Transition and to Silica Glass”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 82(8), pp. 1708-1711. |
Dubbeldam, D. et al. (2016) “RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials” Molecular Simulation, (published online Feb. 26, 2015), vol. 42(2), pp. 81-101. |
Dubbeldam, D., et al., (2013) “On the inner workings of Monte Carlo codes” Molecular Simulation, vol. 39, Nos. 14-15, pp. 1253-1292. |
Earl, D. J. et al., (2005) “Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives,” Phys Chem Chem Phys, vol. 7, pp. 3910-3916. |
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering and QuestAir (2008) “A New Commercialized Process for Lower Cost H2 Recovery—Rapid Cycle Pressure Swing Adsorption (RCPSA),” Brochure, 4 pgs. |
Fang, H. et al., (2013) “First principles derived, transferable force fields for CO2 adsorption in Na-exchanged cationic zeolites,” Phys Chem Chem Phys, vol. 15, pp. 12882-12894. |
Fang, H., et al., (2012) “Prediction of CO2 Adsorption Properties in Zeolites Using Force Fields Derived from Periodic Dispersion-Corrected DFT Calculations,” J Phys Chem C, 10692, 116, ACS Publications. |
Farooq, S. et al. (1990) “Continuous Countercurrent Flow Model for a Bulk Psa Separation Process,” AIChE J., v36 (2) p. 310-314. |
FlowServe (2005) “Exceeding Expectations, US Navy Cuts Maintenance Costs With Flowserve GX-200 Non-Contacting Seal Retrofits,” Face-to-Face, v17.1, 8 pgs. |
Foster, M.D., et al. “A geometric solution to the largest-free-sphere problem in zeolite frameworks”, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 90, pp. 32-38. |
Frenkel, D. et al., (2002) “Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications”, 2nd ed., Academic Press, pp. 292-301. |
Garcia, E. J., et al. (2014) “Tuning the Adsorption Properties of Zeolites as Adsorbents for CO2 Separation: Best Compromise between the Working Capacity and Selectivity”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 53, pp. 9860-9874. |
GE Oil & Gas (2007) “Dry Gas Seal Retrofit,” Florene, Italy, www.ge.com/oilandgas, 4 pgs. |
Harris, J. G. et al., (1995) “Carbon Dioxide's Liquid—Vapor Coexistence Curve and Critical Properties as Predicted by a Simple Molecular Model”, J Phys Chem, vol. 99, pp. 12021-12024. |
Hill, J. R. et al., (1995) “Molecular Mechanics Potential for Silica and Zeolite Catalysts Based on ab Initio Calculations. 2. Aluminosilicates”, J Phys Chem, vol. 99, pp. 9536-9550. |
Hopper, B. et al. (2008) “World's First 10,000 psi Sour Gas Injection Compressor,” Proceedings of the 37th Turbomachinery Symposium, pp. 73-95. |
Jain, S., et al. (2003) “Heuristic design of pressure swing adsorption: a preliminary study”, Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 33, pp. 25-43. |
Kim J et al. (2012) “Predicting Large CO2 Adsorption in Aluminosilicate Zeolites for Postcombustion Carbon Dioxide Capture”, J. Am. Chem, Soc., vol. 134, pp. 18940-18940. |
Kärger, J., et al.(2012) “Diffusion in Nanoporous Materials” , Whiley-VCH publisher, vol. 1, Chapter 16, pp. 483-501. |
Kikkinides, E. S. et al. (1995) “Natural Gas Desulfurization by Adsorption: Feasibility and Multiplicity of Cyclic Steady States,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. V. 34, pp. 255-262. |
Lin, L., et al. (2012) “In silico screening of carbon-capture materials”, Nature Materials, vol. 1, pp. 633-641. |
Liu, Q. et al., (2010) “NaKA sorbents with high CO2-over-N2 selectivity and high capacity to adsorb CO2,” Chem Commun, vol. 46, pp. 4502-4504. |
Lowenstein, W., (1954) “The Distribution of Aluminum in the Tetra-Hedra of Silicates and Aluminates” Am Mineral, 92-96. |
Neimark, A. V. et al., (1997) “Calibration of Pore Volume in Adsorption Experiments and Theoretical Models”, Langmuir, vol. 13, pp. 5148-5160. |
Palomino, M., et al. (2009) “New Insights on CO2-Methane Seapration Using LTA Zeolites with Different Si/Al Ratios and a First Comparison with MOFs”, Langmar, vol. 26(3), pp. 1910-1917. |
Patcas, F.C. et al.(2007) “CO Oxidation Over Structured Carriers: A Comparison of Ceramic Forms, Honeycombs and Beads”, Chem Engineering Science, v. 62, pp. 3984-3990. |
Peng, D. Y., et al., (1976) “A New Two-Constant Equation of State”, Ind Eng Chem Fundam, vol. 15, pp. 59-64. |
Pham, T. D. et al., (2013) “Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Adsorption on Cation-Exchanged SSZ-13 Zeolites”, Langmuir, vol. 29, pp. 832-839. |
Pophale, R., et al., (2011) “A database of new zeolite-like materials”, Phys Chem Chem Phys, vol. 13(27), pp. 12407-12412. |
Potoff, J. J. et al., (2001) “Vapor-Liquid Equilibria of Mixtures Containing Alkanes, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen”, AIChE J, vol. 47(7), pp. 1676-1682. |
Rameshni, Mahin “Strategies for Sour Gas Field Developments,” Worley Parsons-Brochure, 20 pp. |
Reyes, S. C. et al. (1997) “Frequency Modulation Methods for Diffusion and Adsorption Measurements in Porous Solids,” J. Phys. Chem. B. v101, pp. 614-622. |
Rezaei, F. et al. (2009) “Optimum Structured Adsorbents for Gas Separation Process”, Chem. Engineering Science, v. 64, pp. 5182-5191. |
Richardson, J.T. et al. (2000) “Properties of Ceramic Foam Catalyst Supports: Pressure Dop”, Applied Catalysis A: General v. 204, pp. 19-32. |
Robinson, D. B., et al., (1985) “The development of the Peng-Robinson Equation and its Application to Phase Equilibrium in a System Containing Methanol,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 24, pp. 25-41. |
Ruthven, D. M. et al. (1996) “Performance of a Parallel Passage Adsorbent Contactor,” Gas. Sep. Purif, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 63-73. |
Stahley, J. S. (2003) “Design, Operation, and Maintenance Considerations for Improved Dry Gas Seal Reliability in Centrifugal Compressors,” Dresser-Rand, Tech. Paper 134, 15 pages. |
Santos, M. S (2011) “New Cycle configuration to enhance performance of kinetic PSA processes” Chemical Engineering Science 66, pp. 1590-1599. |
Snurr, R. Q. et al., (1993) “Prediction of Adsorption of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Silicalite from Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations with Biased Insertions”, J Phys Chem, vol. 97, pp. 13742-13752. |
Stemmet, C.P. et al. (2006) “Solid Foam Packings for Multiphase Reactors: Modelling of Liquid Holdup and Mass Transfer”, Chem. Engineering Research and Design, v. 84(A12), pp. 1134-1141. |
Suzuki, M. (1985) “Continuous-Countercurrent-Flow Approximation for Dynamic Steady State Profile of Pressure Swing Adsorption” AIChE Symp. Ser. v81 (242) pp. 67-73. |
Talu, O. et al., (2001), “Reference potentials for adsorption of helium, argon, methane, and krypton in high-silica zeolites,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 83-93, pp. 83-93. |
Walton, K. S. et al., (2006) “CO2 adsorption in Y and X zeolites modified by alkali metal cation exchange,” Microporous and Mesoporous Mat, vol. 91, pp. 78-84. |
Willems, T. F. et al., (2012) “Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials” Microporous Mesoporous Mat, vol. 149, pp. 134-141. |
Zukal, A., et al., (2009) “Isosteric heats of adsorption of carbon dioxide on zeolite MCM-22 modified by alkali metal cations”, Adsorption, vol. 15, pp. 264-270. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190381447 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62381838 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15670768 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 16548995 | US |