The present techniques relate to a system and method associated with an enhanced swing adsorption process. In particular, the system relates to a swing adsorption process for the removing contaminants from a feed stream utilizing adsorbent bed units.
Gas separation is useful in many industries and can typically be accomplished by flowing a mixture of gases over an adsorbent material that preferentially adsorbs one or more gas components in a feed stream, while not adsorbing one or more other gas components. The non-adsorbed components are recovered as a separate product. The separation of gas components by adsorption is a conventional technique that is performed in a variety of approaches. For example, adsorptive separations may be based on the differences in equilibrium affinities of the various gas components (e.g., equilibrium separations) or on the differences in adsorption kinetics of the gas components (e.g., kinetics separations).
One particular type of gas separation technology is swing adsorption, such as temperature swing adsorption (TSA), pressure swing adsorption (PSA), partial pressure swing adsorption (PPSA), rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption (RCPSA), rapid cycle partial pressure swing adsorption (RCPPSA), and not limited to but also combinations of the fore mentioned processes, such as pressure and temperature swing adsorption. As an example, PSA processes rely on the phenomenon of certain gas components being more readily adsorbed within the pore structure or free volume of an adsorbent material when the gas component is under pressure. That is, the higher the gas pressure, the greater the amount of readily-adsorbed gas adsorbed. When the pressure is reduced, the adsorbed gas component is released, or desorbed from the adsorbent material.
The swing adsorption processes (e.g., PSA and TSA) may be used to separate gas components of a gas mixture because different gas components tend to fill the micropore of the adsorbent material to different extents. For example, if a gas mixture, such as natural gas, is passed under pressure through an adsorbent bed unit, which may referred to as adsorbent bed unit or vessel, containing an adsorbent material that is more selective towards carbon dioxide than it is for methane, at least a portion of the carbon dioxide is selectively adsorbed by the adsorbent material, and the gas exiting the adsorbent bed unit is enriched in methane. When the adsorbent material reaches the end of its capacity to adsorb carbon dioxide, it is regenerated by reducing the pressure, thereby releasing the adsorbed carbon dioxide. The adsorbent material is then typically purged and repressurized. Then, the adsorbent material is ready for another adsorption cycle.
The swing adsorption processes typically involve adsorbent bed units, which include an adsorbent material disposed within the housing of the adsorbent bed unit. These adsorbent bed units utilize different packing material in the adsorbent bed structures. For example, the adsorbent bed units utilize checker brick, pebble beds or other available packing. As an enhancement, some adsorbent bed units may utilize engineered packing within the adsorbent bed structure. The engineered packing may include a material provided in a specific configuration, such as a honeycomb, ceramic forms or the like. The engineered packing may be formed from the adsorbent material or may be a coating on a structure or support.
Further, various adsorbent bed units may be coupled together with conduits, manifolds and valves to manage the flow of fluids. Orchestrating these adsorbent bed units involves coordinating the cycles for each of the adsorbent bed units with other adsorbent bed units in the system. A complete cycle can vary from seconds to minutes as it transfers a plurality of gaseous streams through one or more of the adsorbent bed units.
However, swing adsorption processes present certain challenges because of several demanding technical factors, such as rapid cycle adsorption processes. These factors may include maintaining a low pressure drop through the adsorbent bed, good flow distribution to and within the adsorbent bed and minimal dispersion (e.g., axial spreading) of the concentration front in the adsorbent bed. Also, another factor may include a rapid cycling time that involves fast acting and low dead-volume valves. Finally, another factor may be that an adsorbent bed unit should be configured to contain the adsorbent bed at certain pressures, to support the fast acting valves, and to minimize the dead volume within the adsorbent bed unit.
These challenges are even more complicated for maintenance of the adsorbent bed unit. A conventional rapid cycle adsorbent bed unit is configured as a vertical cylinder with flat endplates (heads) for minimizing dead volume. Flow enters and exits the adsorbent bed unit through fast-acting valves mounted on the flat heads adjacent to the adsorbent material. The location of the valves on the heads results in significant challenges for the replacement of the adsorbent bed. For example, in a conventional adsorbent bed configuration, the valves on one end of the adsorbent bed have to be removed along with any associated manifolds and/or conduits to provide access to the adsorbent bed. The removal of the valves, manifolds and conduits is labor intensive, time consuming and increases the operating costs of the system. As such, the replacement of the adsorbent bed in the unit is problematic.
Accordingly, there remains a need in the industry for apparatus, methods, and systems that provided enhancements to manage the flow of fluids to the adsorbent beds. The present techniques overcome the drawbacks of conventional swing adsorption approaches by providing access through the head to the adsorbent material within the adsorbent bed unit. The present techniques lessen the maintenance outage, lessen labor and cost associated with the maintenance with the adsorbent bed unit as compared to conventional approaches and systems.
In one embodiment, the present techniques describe a cyclical swing adsorbent bed unit for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream. A cyclical swing adsorbent bed unit may be configured to removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream. The adsorbent bed unit comprising: a housing forming an interior region, the housing including a body portion secured between a first head and a second head; an adsorbent bed disposed within the interior region; and a plurality of first valves secured to the housing, wherein each of the plurality of first valves is configured to control fluid flow along a flow path extending from a location external to the housing through a conduit and to the adsorbent bed, wherein each of the plurality of first valves has a valve cross sectional area disposed outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed.
In yet another embodiment, a process for removing contaminants from a feed stream is described. The process includes: a) performing one or more adsorption steps in an adsorbent bed unit, wherein each of the one or more adsorption steps comprise: (i) opening at least one first poppet valve to pass a gaseous feed stream from a feed inlet conduit to an adsorbent bed disposed in an interior region of a housing of the adsorbent bed unit, wherein the at least one first poppet valve is in direct flow communication with the feed inlet conduit and configured to control fluid flow along a flow path extending from a location external to the housing through the feed inlet conduit and to the adsorbent bed, wherein at least one first poppet valve has a first valve cross sectional area disposed outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed, (ii) exposing the gaseous feed stream to the adsorbent bed to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream, and (iii) opening one or more product poppet valves to conduct away the product stream from the interior region in the housing to a product conduit; b) performing one or more purge steps, wherein each of the one or more purge steps comprise passing a purge stream into the adsorbent bed unit to conduct away at least a portion of the one or more contaminants in a purge output stream, wherein the purge output stream is passed through at least one second poppet valve, wherein at least one second poppet valve has a second valve cross sectional area disposed outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed; and c) repeating the steps a) to b) for at least one additional cycle, wherein the cycle duration is for a period greater than 1 second and less than 600 seconds. The process may include interrupting the cycle; removing a head from the adsorbent bed unit near the at least one first poppet valve and the at least one second poppet valve to expose an opening to the interior region; and removing the adsorbent bed from the interior region, wherein the at least one first poppet valve and the at least one second poppet valve are coupled to the adsorbent bed unit. The process may further include disposing a second adsorbent bed into the interior region; securing the head to the adsorbent bed unit; and resuming the cycle for the process. Moreover, the process may include guiding the adsorbent bed unit within the interior region with a thermal expansion ring.
The foregoing and other advantages of the present disclosure may become apparent upon reviewing the following detailed description and drawings of non-limiting examples of embodiments.
Unless otherwise explained, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. The singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, the word “or” is intended to include “and” unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “includes” means “comprises.” All patents and publications mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety, unless otherwise indicated. In case of conflict as to the meaning of a term or phrase, the present specification, including explanations of terms, control. Directional terms, such as “upper,” “lower,” “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “vertical,” and “horizontal,” are used herein to express and clarify the relationship between various elements. It should be understood that such terms do not denote absolute orientation (e.g., a “vertical” component can become horizontal by rotating the device). The materials, methods, and examples recited herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
As used herein, “stream” refers to fluid (e.g., solids, liquid and/or gas) being conducted through various equipment. The equipment may include conduits, vessels, manifolds, units or other suitable devices.
As used herein, “conduit” refers to a tubular member forming a channel through which something is conveyed. The conduit may include one or more of a pipe, a manifold, a tube or the like.
The term “in direct flow communication” or “in direct fluid communication” means in direct flow communication without intervening valves or other closure means for obstructing flow. However, the term “in direct flow communication” may include distributors or other distribution mechanisms to distribute the flow along the flow path. As may be appreciated, other variations may also be envisioned within the scope of the present techniques.
The term “interface cross sectional area” means the cross sectional area of an end of the adsorbent bed where the stream enters or exits the adsorbent bed. For example, if a feed stream enters an adsorbent bed at a first end, the cross sectional area of the first end is the interface cross sectional area. As may be appreciated, other variations may also be envisioned within the scope of the present techniques.
The term “valve cross sectional area” means the cross sectional area of a valve relative to an end of the valve where the stream enters or exits the valve. For example, the valve opening may be the valve cross sectional area. In particular, for a poppet valve, a disk element moves to provide a flow passage around the disk element when it is in the open position. Accordingly, the valve opening formed by the disk element's movement away from the valve seat is utilized to determine the valve cross sectional area for the poppet valve, which may be the cross sectional area of the disk element. As may be appreciated, other variations may also be envisioned within the scope of the present techniques.
The term “valve cross sectional area disposed at least partially within the interface cross sectional area” means that the valve cross sectional area is at least partially within the interface cross sectional area when viewed along an axis passing directly through the adsorbent bed along the predominate flow path. For example, the adsorbent bed has an interface at one end where flow enters or exits the adsorbent bed. The interface has a length and a width, while the depth is direction of flow of the stream along the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed.
The term “valve cross sectional area disposed outside of an interface cross sectional area” means that the valve cross sectional area is outside or extending beyond the interface cross sectional area when viewed along an axis passing directly through the adsorbent bed along the predominate flow path. For example, the adsorbent bed has an interface at one end where flow enters or exits the adsorbent bed. The interface has a length and a width, while the depth is direction of flow of the stream along the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed.
The term “valve cross sectional area disposed within an interface cross sectional area” means that the valve cross sectional area is within or in the interface cross sectional area when viewed along an axis passing directly through the adsorbent bed along the predominate flow path.
The present techniques relate to a swing adsorption process (e.g., a rapid cycle process) for the removing contaminants from a feed stream (e.g., natural gas) utilizing rapidly cycled adsorbent beds. The present techniques balance the dead volume within the adsorbent bed unit with the maintenance and operability associated with the adsorbent bed unit. In many configurations, the valves are disposed in the adsorbent bed unit's head to lessen the dead volume for swing adsorption processes. However, as the adsorbent material has to be changed on a periodic basis (e.g., once a year, or every two years), the access to the adsorbent material typically involves removing the valves, associated conduits and associated manifolds to provide access to the adsorbent material. The removal of this equipment is labor intensive, introduces failure points to the system and extends the time period for maintenance of the adsorbent bed unit. Accordingly, the present techniques provide an adsorbent bed unit that accommodates the necessary access to the adsorbent material, while managing the dead volume of the adsorbent bed unit in a specific configuration to lessens performance problems from the additional dead volume. In this configuration, the valves for one of the heads have valve cross sectional area disposed outside of or beyond an interface cross sectional area (e.g., cross sectional are defined by an interface to the adsorbent bed).
In contrast to conventional approaches, the present techniques provide access to the adsorbent material to accommodate maintenance on the adsorbent bed unit by having the valves disposed outside of the interface cross sectional area (e.g., outside the head cross sectional area). In conventional configurations, the adsorbent bed has an interface cross section area, which has the valves in direct flow communication with the adsorbent bed disposed directly adjacent to the adsorbent bed and within the interface cross sectional area. In the present techniques, the valves for one of the heads are disposed outside the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed and even outside the head cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed unit. In particular, the valves for one of the heads are disposed outside the outer perimeter of the adsorbent bed unit's head. Accordingly, the present techniques provide access to the adsorbent material through a single head without having to remove other equipment associated with the adsorbent bed unit (e.g., without having to remove valves, conduits or manifolds), which lessens maintenance costs, maintenance time and damage to equipment, managing the dead volume to an acceptable level, and providing an acceptable flow distribution to the adsorbent bed.
In one or more embodiments, the adsorbent bed unit may be a modified vertical cylindrical adsorbent bed unit that is configured to have the flow valves for one head of the adsorbent bed unit not disposed within the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed or even partially within the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed. For example, the flow valves for one head may be disposed on the head of the adsorbent bed unit directly adjacent to the adsorbent bed (e.g., within or partially within the interface cross sectional area), while the flow valves for a second head are configured to be disposed in an outlying location (e.g., disposed outside the interface cross sectional area). This configuration provides maintenance access to the adsorbent bed. The outlying valve mounting locations may be formed integrally with the unit's head, or it may be formed in a separate plate that is located between the units flange and the unit's head. While single valves may be disposed in the different locations, multiple valves may also be used depending on the requirements of the specific application. Also, the valves may be actively-controlled valves and/or passively-controlled valves. A passively-controlled valve may be opened by the differential pressure acting across its moving element (e.g., disk element) without the need to otherwise actuate the moving element.
In certain embodiments, various features may be provided to further enhance the adsorbent bed unit. For example, a thermal expansion ring may be disposed between the adsorbent bed and one of the adsorbent bed unit's heads (e.g., the head having valves disposed within or partially within the interface cross sectional area). The thermal expansion ring may be configured to guide the adsorbent bed, to align the adsorbent bed within the adsorbent bed unit, to adjust for thermal expansion and to guide the adsorbent bed during insertion into the adsorbent bed unit. Further, the adsorbent bed unit may also include a temporary debris foil. The debris foil may be used during maintenance to collect any debris that falls into the adsorbent bed unit during the exchange of the adsorbent materials (e.g., adsorbent bed) and may be disposed between the adsorbent bed and valves near one of the ends (e.g., near one of the heads). For example, if the adsorbent bed is a vertically oriented configuration, the debris foil may be inserted into a deflection port between the lower valves and the adsorbent bed before the adsorbent bed removal begins. Then, any debris may fall to the debris foil and be removed from the adsorbent bed unit. Following insertion of the adsorbent bed unit, the debris foil may be removed and the deflection port may be plugged for operation.
The present techniques may be used to enhance the swing adsorption processes. For example, the cycle for a swing adsorption process may involve two or more steps that each has a certain time interval, which are summed together to be the cycle time. These steps include regeneration of the adsorbent bed following the adsorption step using a variety of methods including pressure swing, vacuum swing, temperature swing, purging (via any suitable type of purge fluid for the process), and combinations thereof. By way of example, a swing adsorption cycle may include the steps of adsorption, depressurization, purging, and re-pressurization. When performing the separation at high pressure, depressurization and re-pressurization (which may be referred to as equalization steps) are performed in multiple steps to reduce the pressure change for each step and enhance efficiency. In some swing adsorption processes, such as rapid cycle swing adsorption processes, a substantial portion of the total cycle time is involved in the regeneration of the adsorbent bed. Accordingly, any reductions in the amount of time for regeneration results in a reduction of the total cycle time. This reduction may also reduce the overall size of the swing adsorption system.
As may be appreciated, the present techniques may also include various pressures for the feed stream and the purge stream. As a result, the adsorbent bed unit may operate in a range of pressures from 5 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) to 1,400 psia. For example, the feed pressure may be based on the preferred adsorption feed pressure, which may be in the range from 400 psia to 1,400 psia, or in the range from 600 psia to 1,200 psia. Also, the purge pressure may be based on the preferred adsorbent purge pressure, which may be in the range from 50 psia to 800 psia, or in the range from 400 psia to 600 psia.
The present techniques may be integrated into a various configurations. For example, the adsorbent bed unit may include structured or unstructured adsorbent beds, and the adsorbent bed unit may also include additional features to facilitate flow straightening and flow distribution. Also, the present techniques may be utilized, but not limited to, dehydration prior to and integrated with a cryogenic Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) recovery, which may involve removing contaminants to cryogenic processing feed gas specifications. Other integrations may include liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant, or other such plants. Regardless, the present techniques may be used to treat feed streams containing excessive amounts of contaminants, such as water and CO2. The present techniques may also be used to remove contaminants to other specifications, such as cryogenic natural gas liquefaction specifications for a cryogenic natural gas liquefaction recovery plant.
In one or more embodiments, the present techniques can be used for any type of swing adsorption process. Non-limiting swing adsorption processes for which the present techniques may include pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum pressure swing adsorption (VPSA), temperature swing adsorption (TSA), partial pressure swing adsorption (PPSA), rapid cycle pressure swing adsorption (RCPSA), rapid cycle thermal swing adsorption (RCTSA), rapid cycle partial pressure swing adsorption (RCPPSA), as well as combinations of these processes, such as pressure/temperature swing adsorption. Exemplary kinetic swing adsorption processes are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2008/0282892, 2008/0282887, 2008/0282886, 2008/0282885, 2008/0282884 and 2014/0013955, which are each herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
In certain embodiments, the adsorbent bed unit may include a housing, which may include a head portion and other body portions, that forms a substantially gas impermeable partition, an adsorbent bed disposed within the housing and a plurality of valves (e.g., poppet valves) providing fluid flow passages through openings in the housing between the interior region of the housing and locations external to the interior region of the housing. Each of the poppet valves may include a disk element that is seatable within the head or a disk element that is seatable within a separate valve seat inserted within the head. The configuration of the poppet valves may be any variety of valve patterns or configuration of types of poppet valves. As an example, the adsorbent bed unit may include one or more poppet valves, each in flow communication with a different conduit associated with different streams. The poppet valves may provide fluid communication between the adsorbent bed and one of the respective conduits, manifolds or headers.
Adsorptive separation processes, apparatus, and systems, as described above, are useful for development and production of hydrocarbons, such as gas and oil processing. Particularly, the provided processes, apparatus, and systems are useful for the rapid, large scale, efficient separation of a variety of target gases from gas mixtures. In particular, the processes, apparatus, and systems may be used to prepare feed products (e.g., natural gas products) by removing contaminants and heavy hydrocarbons (e.g., hydrocarbons having at least two carbon atoms). The provided processes, apparatus, and systems are useful for preparing gaseous feed streams for use in utilities, including separation applications. The separation applications may include dew point control; sweetening and/or detoxification; corrosion protection and/or control; dehydration; heating value; conditioning; and/or purification. Examples of utilities that utilize one or more separation applications include generation of fuel gas; seal gas; non-potable water; blanket gas; instrument and control gas; refrigerant; inert gas; and/or hydrocarbon recovery.
In other embodiments, the present techniques may be used to lessen contaminants of the stream to a specific level by the swing adsorption process. Accordingly, the present techniques provide additional space for valves, such as poppet valves, by disposing the valves outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed (e.g., the valves have a valve cross sectional area disposed outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed for one of the adsorbent bed unit heads). The present techniques may be further understood with reference to the
In this system, the adsorbent bed units, such as adsorbent bed unit 102, may be configured for a cyclical swing adsorption process for removing contaminants from feed streams (e.g., fluids, gaseous or liquids). For example, the adsorbent bed unit 102 may include various conduits (e.g., conduit 104) for managing the flow of fluids through, to or from the adsorbent bed within the adsorbent bed unit 102. These conduits from the adsorbent bed units 102 may be coupled to a manifold (e.g., manifold 106) to distribute the flow of the stream to, from or between components. The adsorbent bed within an adsorbent bed unit may separate one or more contaminants from the feed stream to form a product stream. As may be appreciated, the adsorbent bed units may include other conduits to control other fluid steams as part of the process, such as purge streams, depressurizations streams, and the like. Further, the adsorbent bed unit may also include one or more equalization vessels, such as equalization vessel 108, which are dedicated to the adsorbent bed unit and may be dedicated to one or more step in the swing adsorption process.
As an example, which is discussed further below, the adsorbent bed unit 102 may include a housing, which may include a head portion and other body portions, that forms a substantially gas impermeable partition, an adsorbent bed disposed within the housing and a plurality of valves providing fluid flow passages through openings in the housing between the interior region of the housing and locations external to the interior region of the housing. The adsorbent bed may include a solid adsorbent material capable of adsorbing one or more components from the feed stream. Such solid adsorbent materials are selected to be durable against the physical and chemical conditions within the adsorbent bed unit 102 and can include metallic, ceramic, or other materials, depending on the adsorption process. Further examples of adsorbent materials are noted further below.
As a specific example,
As shown in this conventional adsorbent bed unit 200, the valves, which are disposed in the valve ports 204, are positioned directly above the adsorbent bed within the perimeter 212 (e.g., within the interface cross sectional area). However, the removal of the flat head 202 to provide access to the adsorbent material within the adsorbent bed unit 200 involves the removal of the valves, associated conduits and associated manifold to provide access.
For most rapid cycle swing adsorption processes, the dead volume should be minimized By way of example, a dehydration cycle for LNG applications may be considered. In such a process, the cycle may include a feed step that adsorbs contaminants from the feed stream and a regeneration step that removes the contaminants by passing a purge stream through the adsorbent bed, which may be in one or more purge steps. The process inventories for such a process are low and excess dead volume may result in the process operating off specification. This challenge is particularly detrimental in processes that involve a temperature swing as part of the process, where the heating fluid temperature is lessened due to heat loss in the excessive dead volume.
Further, the excess dead volume may be more problematic on one end of the process. For example, the excess dead volume on the product side or product end may be more detrimental than excess dead volume on the feed side or feed end. This is a result of the excessive dead volume on the product end having cooler gas within that excess dead volume prior to the start of the purge step. Once purge commences, the hot purge gas in the purge stream mixes with the cool gas in the excess dead volume, which results in the purge gas being cooled as it is passed to the adsorbent bed. Unfortunately, the cooler purge stream does not regenerate the adsorbent bed as efficiently as a hotter purge stream. Moreover, the additional header volume may increase the surface area and thermal mass in which the hot purge gas is in contact. This results in an increase in heat loss from the purge gas to the surroundings (e.g., region within the adsorbent bed unit upstream of the adsorbent bed), which also lessens the adsorbent bed's regeneration efficiency.
The detrimental effect of excess dead volume at the respective ends of the adsorbent bed are described in
As noted above, the conventional configuration of the adsorbent bed unit, as shown in
By way of example, for such a configuration above, only four services may be considered for the process. Accordingly, the configuration may include a feed inlet and purge outlet on the top flat head and a product outlet and purge inlet on the bottom flat head. Each service may use a single valve, but other configurations may include dual service valves. It should also be noted that the valves may be the actively-controlled valves and/or passively-controlled valves. In this configuration, the regions between the poppet valves and the adsorbent bed are the dead volumes. These dead volumes are a mixing zone, where fluid streams from the two services on either side of the vessel mix and there is heat transfer to surrounding metal. As may be appreciated, for efficient process operation, the mixing zone is preferably minimized. However, due to this configuration, the access to the adsorbent material, such as the adsorbent bed, becomes challenging as the whole valve assembly has to be removed. This removal may be labor intensive and shorten the lifecycle of the equipment, as the removal of valve assembly may include removing various hydraulic connections (e.g., three to seven for each valve assembly).
The present techniques provide embodiments to overcome the limitations on the access to the adsorbent material within the adsorbent bed unit. For example,
The upper head 406 and lower head 408 may have different configurations, such that one of the heads 406 or 408 may provide access to the adsorbent bed 402. The adsorbent bed unit is coupled to different manifolds (not shown) to provide and conduct away fluids to the adsorbent bed. In the diagrams 400 and 420, the upper head 406 do not include any valves, while the lower head 408 contains valve assemblies, such as valve assemblies 412 and 414, respectively (e.g., poppet valves). For the upper region of the adsorbent bed, fluids flow into or out of the upper open flow path volume between the head 406 and the adsorbent bed 402 via valves structures, such as valves 416 and 418, which are connected via different conduit configurations. These conduit configurations are discussed further below in the respective diagrams 400 and 420. The upper or lower open flow path volume between the respective head 406 or 408 and adsorbent bed 402 can also contain flow distributors (not shown) which directly introduce fluids into the adsorbent bed 402 in a uniform manner. The flow distributor may include a perforated plate, circular plate or other device that distributes the flow over the adsorbent bed.
If the valve assemblies 412, 414, 416 to 418 are poppet valves, each may include a disk element connected to a stem element which can be positioned within a bushing or valve guide. The stem element may be connected to an actuating means, such as actuating means (not shown), which is configured to have the respective valve impart linear motion to the respective stem. As may be appreciated, the actuating means may be operated independently for different steps in the process to activate a single valve or a single actuating means may be utilized to control two or more valves. Further, while the openings may be substantially similar in size, the openings and inlet valves for inlet manifolds may have a smaller diameter than those for outlet manifolds, given that the gas volumes passing through the inlets may tend to be lower than product volumes passing through the outlets.
In this configuration, the interface is the ends of the adsorbent bed 402 adjacent to the heads 406 and 408. The interface cross sectional area is the cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 402 at the respective ends near heads 406 and 408. For this configuration, the valves 412 and 414 are disposed within or partially within the interface cross sectional area, while the valves 416 and 418 are disposed outside of or beyond the interface cross sectional area, which is defined by the adsorbent bed 402. In addition, the valve cross sectional area for the valves is defined by the shape of the valve adjacent to the adsorbent bed 402 (or nearest face toward the bed for the valves outside the interface cross sectional area), while the interface cross sectional area is defined by the shape of the adsorbent bed 402. In this configuration, the valves 412 and 414 are in direct flow communication with a conduit and configured to control fluid flow along a flow path extending from a location external to the housing through the conduit and to the adsorbent bed 402, wherein the valves 412 and 414 have a valve cross sectional area disposed at least partially within the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 402, while the valves 416 and 418 have a valve cross sectional area outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 402.
As noted above, the valves 416 and 418 are outside the perimeter of the head (e.g., have valve cross sectional areas outside of the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 402). In the diagrams 400 and 420, different configurations are presented with different flow paths for the fluids passing to and conducted away from the adsorbent bed 402. For diagram 400, the valves 416 and 418 provide a flow path through the conduit 417, which is shared between the valves. The flow of the fluids from these valves 416 and 418 has to be diverted to follow the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed. In this configuration, the conduit 417 is a 90 degree elbow connected to the head 406 (e.g., top flat head). On the other end of this elbow, the two valves 416 and 418 are installed. The conduit may be flanged such that removing these flanges can easily provide access to the head 406 and the adsorbent bed 402, without having to remove the valve assembly of valves 416 and 418. In this configuration, the conduit 417 alternately is exposed to warm and cold gas streams flowing through the conduit 417 to the respective valves 416 and 418. As a result, a large heat transfer loss may be present in this configuration.
For diagram 420, the valves 416 and 418 provide a flow path through the conduits 422 and 424, respectively. These conduits 422 and 424 provide a curved flow path from a direction substantially opposite the predominate flow path. As such, the flow of the fluids from these valves 416 and 418 has to be diverted to follow the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed 402. These conduits 422 and 424 are curved into U-bends that are connected to the head 406, with each valve 416 and 418 installed on the other end of these U-bends. The U-bends may be flanged such that removing these flanges can easily provide access to the head 406 and the adsorbent bed 402, without having to remove the respective valves 416 and 418. In this configuration, each conduit 422 and 424 remains at nearly the same temperature throughout the process, as it is exposed to a moving fluid of nearly constant temperature. For example, when the product valve is open, cold gas flow through the conduit connecting to this valve and the other conduit operates nearly as a dead-leg. Similarly, when the purge inlet valve is open, the hot purge gas flow through the conduit connecting to this valve and the other conduit operates nearly as a dead-leg. As such, the heat loss from the purge gas stream is minimal. The mixing zone is also largely restricted to the narrow region between the head 406 and the adsorbent bed 402. While a small amount of mixing may occur in the conduits 422 and 424, it is not expected to be detrimental to the performance.
As a further enhancement, additional refinements to the configuration of the adsorbent bed unit may be implemented. For example, the adsorbent bed unit may be orientated in the vertical axial plane having fixed conduits integral to the housing that are further attached to a series of fast acting process stream valves. The valves may be coupled to a series of process supply and product headers. The upper most limit of the adsorbent bed unit may terminate in a bolt-on cover (e.g., head) used for accessing the adsorbent bed unit's internals, such as the adsorbent bed, and mechanically supports an integral shaped flow vane or flow diverter. Further, the flow vane may be aligned to the process stream valves, which provides a mechanism of distributing the gaseous stream path to and from the adsorbent bed. In addition, the lower most limit of the adsorbent bed unit may terminate in a manifold that further attaches a series of fast acting process stream valves. The lower most manifold supports a similar flow vane having a similar purpose to the upper region.
The adsorbent bed unit includes an adsorbent bed, which may have a cross-sectional geometry of a circular, a square, a rectangular or other polynomial in shape, which is axially aligned to the adsorbent bed unit's vertical axis. The adsorbent bed may be housed in a monolithic metallic shell or liner having integral flow distribution hardware located on both of the adsorbent beds terminating ends. The adsorbent bed may be concentrically supported and aligned with the upper adsorbent bed termination by a plurality of fasteners. The supporting contact surface may be integral to a concentric seal ring, which prevents a by-pass gas stream from traveling other than through the adsorbent bed. The lower adsorbent bed may terminate to be concentrically aligned with a series of equally spaced metallic prongs that permit thermal bed expansion in either axial direction (e.g., with a thermal expansion ring). The prongs may limit the adsorbent beds movement in the horizontal plane.
Further, the present techniques may provide flexible process valve configurations. For example, the present techniques may include alternate process valve locations, such as upper most limit valves may be arranged at any desired angle around the housing perimeter. Also, the valve placement may be utilized to enhance process stream flow alignment to the adsorbent bed when opposing valves are not desirable. The present techniques further provides alternate process valve placement, such as lower most limit valves that may be arranged at any desired vertical orientation to suit a desired dead volume criteria.
Moreover, the present techniques may be utilized to enhance turnaround and adsorbent bed unit maintainability. For example, the present techniques provide a simple method of accessing, removing and replacing the internal adsorbent bed without complex or mechanized apparatuses. Once the primary support is un-bolted the adsorbent bed assembly is lifted from the adsorbent bed unit in a vertical plane. The replacement adsorbent bed assembly is installed in the reverse order. In addition, the process stream valves located directly below the adsorbent bed may be protected with a catch mechanism (e.g., a temporary debris foil). The debris foil may be installed through a removable cover plate. The protective debris foil may lessen or avoid blinding the valve with foreign debris during the unit turnaround and maintenance operations. Further, as another benefit, the removal and replacement of the adsorbent bed assembly without the need to disassembly the process conduits, and associated process valves and their hydraulic utility service systems lessens maintenance operations and costs.
Further still, the present techniques provide various cost saving incentives as compared to conventional adsorbent bed units. For example, a conventional adsorbent bed unit with similar services having vessel closures, which terminate with custom fabricated raised face weld neck flanges, locates all process valves onto a flat closure cover that is significantly thick to overcome a vertical deflection due to impart by the valves dynamic loads and minimal material ligament between each process valve. In comparison, the present techniques may utilize a simple closure cover plate having a minimal material thickness in the proposed configurations. Accordingly, to service the adsorbent bed of the conventional adsorbent bed unit, the closure cover and all process valves and adjoining conduits have to be removed to gain internal access. Yet, the present techniques do not required a mandatory disassembly of the process stream valves or adjoining conduits when gaining access to the adsorbent bed unit's internals. Further, the conventional adsorbent bed unit may also require a complex arrangement of conduits to and from all process stream valves that integrate into large diameter process piping. In comparison, the present techniques employ a simple compact pipe arrangement. The combined savings in material volume and compact pipe-run configuration, which is outlined in the fore mentioned is a direct dollar savings associated to the; initial fabrication, future maintenance and long range unit operability costs.
The present techniques provide embodiments to overcome the limitations on the access to the adsorbent material within the adsorbent bed unit. For example,
The upper head 506 and lower head 508 may have different configurations, such that one of the heads 506 or 508 may provide access to the adsorbent bed 510. The adsorbent bed unit is coupled to different manifolds (not shown) to provide and conduct away fluids to the adsorbent bed. In the diagrams 500, 520, 540 and 560, the upper head 506 do not include any valves, while the lower head 508 contains openings in which valve structures can be inserted, such as valve assemblies 512 and 514, respectively (e.g., poppet valves). For the upper region of the adsorbent bed, fluids flow into or out of the upper open flow path volume between the head 506 and the adsorbent bed 510 via valves structures, such as valves 516 and 518, which are connected via different conduit configurations. These conduit configurations are discussed further below in the respective diagrams 500, 520, 540 and 560. The upper or lower open flow path volume between the respective head 506 or 508 and adsorbent bed 510 can also contain flow distributors (not shown) which directly introduce fluids into the adsorbent bed 510 in a uniform manner. The flow distributor may include a perforated plate, circular plate or other device that distributes the flow over the adsorbent bed.
If the valve assemblies 512, 514, 516 to 518 are poppet valves, each may include a disk element connected to a stem element which can be positioned within a bushing or valve guide. The stem element may be connected to an actuating means, such as actuating means (not shown), which is configured to have the respective valve impart linear motion to the respective stem. As may be appreciated, the actuating means may be operated independently for different steps in the process to activate a single valve or a single actuating means may be utilized to control two or more valves. Further, while the openings may be substantially similar in size, the openings and inlet valves for inlet manifolds may have a smaller diameter than those for outlet manifolds, given that the gas volumes passing through the inlets may tend to be lower than product volumes passing through the outlets.
In this configuration, the interface is the ends of the adsorbent bed 510 adjacent to the heads 506 and 508. The interface cross sectional area is the cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 510 at the respective ends near heads 506 and 508. For this configuration, the valves 512 and 514 are disposed within or partially within the interface cross sectional area, while the valves 516 and 518 are disposed outside of or beyond the interface cross sectional area, which is defined by the adsorbent bed 510. In addition, the valve cross sectional area for the valves is defined by the shape of the valve adjacent to the adsorbent bed 510 (or nearest face toward the bed for the valves outside the interface cross sectional area), while the interface cross sectional area is defined by the shape of the adsorbent bed 510. As an example in diagram 500, if the valve 512 is a poppet valve having a circular disk element and the adsorbent bed 510 has the shape of a circular prism, the valve cross sectional area for the valve 512 is the area of the circle having a diameter 505, while the interface cross sectional area for the adsorbent bed 510 is the area of the circle having a diameter 507. Similarly, if the valve 516 is a poppet valve having a circular disk element, the valve cross sectional area for the valve 516 is the area of the circle having a diameter 509. In this configuration, the valves 512 and 516 are in direct flow communication with a conduit and configured to control fluid flow along a flow path extending from a location external to the housing through the conduit and to the adsorbent bed 510, wherein the valve 512 has a valve cross sectional area disposed within the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 510 and the valve 516 has a valve cross sectional area outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 510. In other configurations, the valves 512 and 514 may have valve cross sectional areas disposed at least partially within the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 510.
As noted above, the valves 516 and 518 are outside the perimeter of the head (e.g., have valve cross sectional areas outside of the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed 510). In the diagrams 500, 520, 540 and 560, different configurations are presented with different flow paths for the fluids passing to and conducted away from the adsorbent bed 510. For diagram 500, the valves 516 and 518 provide a flow path through the conduits 517 and 519, respectively. The flow of the fluids from these valves 516 and 518 has to be diverted to follow the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed. For diagram 520, the valves 516 and 518 provide a flow path through the conduits 522 and 524, respectively. These conduits 522 and 524 provide a curved flow path from a direction substantially opposite the predominate flow path. As such, the flow of the fluids from these valves 516 and 518 has to be diverted to follow the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed 510. For diagram 540, the valves 516 and 518 provide a flow path through the conduits 542 and 544, respectively. These conduits 542 and 544 provide an angled flow path from a direction substantially concurrent with the predominate flow path. As such, the flow of the fluids from these valves 516 and 518 may experience less pressure drop, while has to be diverted to follow the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed 510. For diagram 560, the valves 516 and 518 provide a flow path through the conduits 562 and 564, respectively. These conduits 562 and 564 provide a curved flow path from a direction substantially concurrent with the predominate flow path. As such, the flow of the fluids from these valves 516 and 518 may experience less pressure drop, while has to be diverted to follow the predominate flow path through the adsorbent bed 510.
To further enhance the configuration, structural elements may be used in the passage from the valve to provide near plug flow in the conduit or housing passage for the valve. This may reduce the amount of mixing and the corresponding heat losses to some extent. These configurations may include angled flow paths to manage the temperature front as streams move in and out of the adsorbent beds. Accordingly, the angle and bend within the conduit or housing for the flow into the adsorbent bed should maintain the near plug flow regime through the bend. Accordingly, the conduit or housing that forms the bend may include various structural elements to provide plug flow balancing pressure drop and thermal mass participating in heat exchange. For example,
In addition, for areas outside the adsorbent bed, additional filler elements or structures may be used to lessen the dead volume. The filler structures may include filler material, channels and/or baffles, which may be utilized to manage the flow path and lessen the dead volume within the adsorbent bed unit. Also, the valves, such as valve assemblies, may be configured to operate (e.g., open or close) via a common actuation mechanism, such as a lift plate or other actuation mechanism, for different streams.
Beneficially, the present techniques provide various enhancements. One enhancement is the ability to change the adsorbent bed without removal of valves, conduits or manifolds. Another enhancement is limiting dead volume to an acceptable level to achieve acceptable cycle performance. Yet another enhancement is maintaining an acceptable flow distribution to the adsorbent bed inlet.
Beneficially, the present techniques provide various enhancements. One enhancement is the ability to change the adsorbent bed without removal of valves, conduits or manifolds. Another enhancement is limiting dead volume to an acceptable level to achieve acceptable cycle performance. Yet another enhancement is maintaining an acceptable flow distribution to the adsorbent bed inlet.
The adsorbent bed unit in the diagrams 700, 700, 720, 740, 750, 760 and 770 may be used to perform swing adsorption processes. For example, the swing adsorption process involves a feed step and a regeneration step (e.g., a purge step) that form the cycle. The feed step may involve passing a feed stream through the valve opening 708 to the adsorbent bed 722 and passing a product stream through the valve opening 704. Once the feed stream is interrupted, the regeneration step may involve performing one or more depressurization steps and/or one or more purge steps. The depressurization step may include flowing fluids from the adsorbent bed 722 through the valve opening 710, while the purge step may include passing a purge stream through the valve opening 706 to the adsorbent bed 722 and passing a purge vent stream from the adsorbent bed 722 through the valve opening 710. As may be appreciated, additional process streams may be included in the process with additional valves in other embodiments.
As may be appreciated, the vane or diverter for either of the heads may be configured to manage the flow of the fluids through the adsorbent bed or from the adsorbent bed. For example, as shown in
For example,
As may be appreciated, the thermal expansion ring 804 has different enhancement to provide support the adsorbent bed 802. For example, the curvature of the thermal expansion ring is configured to bend from the unloaded state to the compressed state. Further, the notches 842 in the thermal expansion ring 804 may be used to lessen fatigue of the thermal expansion ring 804. Also, the thermal expansion ring 804 may be fabricated from a material, such as steel.
For example,
To deflect the debris within the adsorbent bed unit during maintenance, a catch mechanism may be utilized to provide a seal during swing adsorption operations and to remove debris from the interior region of the adsorbent bed unit. The catch mechanism may include a maintenance port 912 and a debris foil 914. In diagram 900, the debris foil 914 is disposed through the maintenance port 912 and angled to have any debris that enters the interior region and moves toward the head 906 to be blocked from the valves 908 and 910 by the catch plat 914. In diagram 920, the debris foil 914 is removed and a plug (not shown) is installed into the maintenance port 912. The plug may be used to seal the port and to hinder any fluid flow between the maintenance port 912 and locations external to the adsorbent deb unit's interior region.
As another example,
Similar to the configuration above, a catch mechanism may be utilized to provide a seal during swing adsorption operations and to remove debris from the interior region of the adsorbent bed unit. The catch mechanism may include a maintenance port 952 and a debris foil 954 and a catch plug 956. In diagram 940 of
In this system, the adsorbent bed units, such as adsorbent bed unit 1002, may be configured for a cyclical swing adsorption process for removing contaminants from feed streams (e.g., fluids, gaseous or liquids). For example, the adsorbent bed unit 1002 may include various conduits (e.g., conduit 1004) for managing the flow of fluids through, to or from the adsorbent bed within the adsorbent bed unit 1002. These conduits from the adsorbent bed units 1002 may be coupled to a manifold (e.g., manifold 1006) to distribute the flow of the stream to, from or between components. The adsorbent bed within an adsorbent bed unit may separate one or more contaminants from the feed stream to form a product stream. As may be appreciated, the adsorbent bed units may include other conduits to control other fluid steams as part of the process, such as purge streams, depressurizations streams, and the like.
This configuration of the swing adsorption system provides various enhancement to the operation of the process. For example, the system includes valves for one of the heads, such as upper or first head 1008, disposed at outboard locations (e.g., outside the perimeter of the head 1008 and the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed (not shown)). The other valves for the lower or second head, such as head 1010, are disposed at least partially within the perimeter of the second head or the interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed. In this manner, the adsorbent bed within the adsorbent bed units may be accessed without having to remove any valves, conduits and/or manifolds.
For example,
As another example,
As another example,
In yet another configuration,
As may be appreciated, the acoustic dampening system may further include various enhancements. For example, additional panels may be provided to surround the acoustic panels 1210, 1212, 1214, 1216, 1218 and 1220 by forming a secondary acoustic dampening layer around the first acoustic dampening layer (e.g., acoustic panels 1210, 1212, 1214, 1216, 1218 and 1220). Further, as another example, one or more enclosures may be positioned surrounding the valves 1204, 1205, 1206 and 1207.
As may be appreciated, the present techniques may be utilized to enhance swing adsorption processes. By way of example, a process for removing contaminants from a feed stream may include performing one or more adsorption steps and one or more purge steps. In performing one or more adsorption steps in an adsorbent bed unit, each of the adsorption steps may include (i) opening a plurality of feed poppet valves to pass a gaseous feed stream from a feed inlet conduit to an adsorbent bed disposed in an interior region of a housing of the adsorbent bed unit, (ii) exposing the gaseous feed stream to the adsorbent bed to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream, and (iii) opening one or more product poppet valves to conduct away the product stream from the interior region in the housing to a product conduit. Each of the plurality of feed poppet valves may be in direct flow communication with the feed inlet conduit and may be configured to control fluid flow along a flow path extending from a location external to the housing through the feed inlet conduit and to the adsorbent bed. Further, at least one of the plurality of poppet valves for one end of the adsorbent bed have a valve cross sectional area disposed outside an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed. At the other or second end, at least one of the plurality of poppet valves for the other end of the adsorbent bed have a valve cross sectional area disposed at least partially within an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed. In addition, in performing one or more purge steps, each of the one or more purge steps may include passing a purge stream into the adsorbent bed unit to conduct away at least a portion of the one or more contaminants in a purge output stream. Then, the adsorption and purge steps may be repeated for at least one additional cycle, wherein the cycle duration is for a period greater than 1 second and less than 600 seconds.
Further, the process may include other enhancements. For example, the process may involve moving a common actuation mechanism to open the plurality of valves; passing the gaseous feed stream through a flow path around a filler material disposed adjacent to the adsorbent bed; distributing the gaseous feed stream to the adsorbent bed via a flow distributor disposed between the adsorbent bed and the plurality of feed poppet valves; and/or linearly moving with a feed actuating mechanism at least one feed valve stem to provide a feed opening between a feed disk element coupled to the at least one feed valve stem and a feed seat secured to the housing of the adsorbent bed unit. In addition, the process may include the cycle duration being for a period greater than 1 second and less than 90 seconds to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form the product stream; providing a gaseous feed stream that is a hydrocarbon containing stream having greater than one volume percent hydrocarbons based on the total volume of the feed stream; and/or maintaining the feed pressure during the adsorption step in the range between 400 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) and 1,400 psia.
To manufacture systems and/or adsorbent bed units, various manufacturing techniques may be utilized. By way of example, the method of manufacturing a cyclical swing adsorbent bed unit may include: forming a housing having an interior region, wherein the housing comprises a body portion, a first head and a second head; disposing an adsorbent bed within the interior region of the housing; securing a plurality of first valves into the first head; securing a second plurality of valves to the housing at the end near the second head, wherein the second head does not have any valves; wherein each of the plurality of first and second valves are configured to control fluid flow along a flow path extending from a location external to the housing to the adsorbent bed, wherein at least one of the plurality of first valves have a valve cross sectional area disposed at least partially within of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed and wherein each of the plurality of second valves have a valve cross sectional area disposed outside of an interface cross sectional area of the adsorbent bed and/or the second head's cross sectional area.
In one or more embodiments, the material may include an adsorbent material supported on a non-adsorbent support. Non-limiting examples of adsorbent materials may include alumina, microporous zeolites, carbons, cationic zeolites, high silica zeolites, highly siliceous ordered mesoporous materials, sol gel materials, aluminum phosphorous and oxygen (ALPO) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials containing predominantly aluminum phosphorous and oxygen), silicon aluminum phosphorous and oxygen (SAPO) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials containing predominantly silicon aluminum phosphorous and oxygen), metal organic framework (MOF) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials comprised of a metal organic framework) and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF) materials (microporous and mesoporous materials comprised of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks). Other materials include microporous and mesoporous sorbents functionalized with functional groups. Examples of functional groups, which may be used for CO2 removal, may include primary, secondary, tertiary and other non protogenic basic groups such as amidines, guanidines and biguanides.
In one or more embodiments, the adsorbent bed unit may be utilized to separate contaminants from a feed stream. The method may include passing a gaseous feed stream at a feed pressure through an adsorbent bed unit having an adsorbent contactor to separate one or more contaminants from the gaseous feed stream to form a product stream; interrupting the flow of the gaseous feed stream; performing a depressurization step, wherein the depressurization step reduces the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit; performing a purge step, wherein the purge step reduces the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit; performing a re-pressurization step, wherein the re-pressurization step increases the pressure within the adsorbent bed unit; and repeating the steps a) to e) for at least one additional cycle.
Further, in one or more embodiments, the adsorbent bed unit may include an adsorbent bed that can be used for the separation of a target gas form a gaseous mixture. The adsorbent is usually comprised of an adsorbent material supported on a non-adsorbent support, or contactor. Such contactors contain substantially parallel flow channels wherein 20 volume percent, preferably 15 volume percent or less of the open pore volume of the contactor, excluding the flow channels, is in pores greater than about 20 angstroms. A flow channel is taken to be that portion of the contactor in which gas flows, if a steady state pressure difference is applied between the point or place at which a feed stream enters the contactor and the point or place at which a product stream leaves the contactor. In the contactor, the adsorbent is incorporated into the wall of the flow channel.
In yet another embodiment, a cyclical swing adsorbent bed unit for removing contaminants from a gaseous feed stream is described. The adsorbent bed unit comprising: a housing forming an interior region; an adsorbent bed disposed within the interior region; and a plurality of valves secured to the housing, wherein each of the plurality of valves is configured to control fluid flow along a flow path extending from a location external to the housing through a conduit and to the adsorbent bed, wherein one of the heads does not have any valves disposed within the perimeter of the head or within the head's cross sectional.
Further, the adsorbent bed units may include actively-controlled poppet valves and passively-controlled valves. The actively-controlled poppet valves, which may be referred to as actively-controlled poppet valve assemblies, may each include stem element secured to a disk element that is seatable within the head or a disk element that is seatable within a separate valve seat inserted within the head. The stem element may be connected to an actuating mechanism, such as electro-hydraulic or electro-pneumatic actuating mechanisms, which is configured to have the respective valve impart linear motion to the respective stem element. As may be appreciated, the actuating mechanism may be operated independently for different steps in the process to activate a single valve or a single actuating mechanism may be utilized to control two or more valves. As an example, opening an actively-controlled poppet valve may include linearly moving with a actuating mechanism at least one valve stem to provide an opening between a disk element coupled to the at least one valve stem and a seat secured to the housing of the adsorbent bed unit. As another example, opening actively-controlled poppet valves may include linearly moving a lift plate secured to the valve stems with an actuating mechanism to provide openings, wherein each of the valve stems is secured to a disk element and each of the openings forms a gap or flow path between the disk element and an associated seat secured to the housing of the adsorbent bed unit.
The passively-controlled valve may include passively-controlled poppet valves, passively-controlled check valves, passively-controlled reed valves, and the other suitable passively-controlled valves. For example, the passively-controlled poppet valves, which may be referred to as passively-controlled poppet valve assemblies, may each include stem element secured to a disk element that is seatable within the head or a disk element that is seatable within a separate valve seat inserted within the head. The stem element may be connected to a biasing mechanism, such as a spring or other biasing mechanisms, which is configured to have the respective valve impart linear motion to the respective stem element. As may be appreciated, the biasing mechanism may be operated independently for different steps in the process and may be activated based on a pressure differential to activate a single valve or two or more valves. One configuration of a passively-controlled poppet valve may include a spring-loaded passively-controlled poppet valve. In this spring-loaded configuration, the disk element may be an integral component with a hollow stem element, which has the springs disposed at least partially within the hollow stem element. As an example, the opening of passively-controlled poppet valves may include linearly moving with a product biasing mechanism at least one product valve stem to provide a product opening between a product disk element coupled to the at least one product valve stem and a product seat secured to the housing of the adsorbent bed unit. The product biasing mechanism may be configured to move linearly based on a pressure differential between the interior region and the product conduit exceeding a specific threshold. In other configurations, the linear movement based on the pressure differential may be different for various valves operating in phase. For example, the passively-controlled valves operating in phase may involve a range or a differential window of less than 25%, less than 20% or less than 10% (e.g., differential window may be calculated as the highest pressure differential minus the lowest pressure differential with that difference being divided by the highest pressure differential). As another example, a passively-controlled valve may also be configured as a reed-valve comprised of a flexible strip of metal or composite material anchored on one end and bending to open the passively controlled flow area. The passively-controlled reed valve may be utilized to provide more flow at a given differential pressure in a given footprint.
In one or more embodiments, the rapid cycle swing adsorption process in the present techniques is a rapid cycle temperature swing adsorption (RCTSA) and a pressure swing adsorption (PSA). For RCTSA the total cycle times are typically less than 600 seconds, preferably less than 200 seconds, more preferably less than 100 seconds, and even more preferably less than 60 seconds.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrative embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention.
This is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/450,618, filed Mar. 6, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/310,289, filed Mar. 18, 2016, entitled APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR SWING ADSORPTION PROCESSES RELATED THERETO, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1868138 | Fisk | Jul 1932 | A |
2625237 | Gribler | Jan 1953 | A |
3103425 | Meyer | Sep 1963 | A |
3124152 | Payne | Mar 1964 | A |
3142547 | Marsh et al. | Jul 1964 | A |
3508758 | Strub | Apr 1970 | A |
3594983 | Yearout | Jul 1971 | A |
3602247 | Bunn et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3788036 | Lee et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3967464 | Cormier et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4187092 | Woolley | Feb 1980 | A |
4261815 | Kelland | Apr 1981 | A |
4324565 | Benkmann | Apr 1982 | A |
4325565 | Winchell | Apr 1982 | A |
4329162 | Pitcher | May 1982 | A |
4340398 | Doshi et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4386947 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4421531 | Dalton, Jr. et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4445441 | Tanca | May 1984 | A |
4461630 | Cassidy et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4496376 | Hradek | Jan 1985 | A |
4559065 | Null et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4631073 | Null et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4693730 | Miller et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4705627 | Miwa et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4711968 | Oswald et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4737170 | Searle | Apr 1988 | A |
4770676 | Sircar et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4783205 | Searle | Nov 1988 | A |
4784672 | Sircar | Nov 1988 | A |
4790272 | Woolenweber | Dec 1988 | A |
4802899 | Vrana | Feb 1989 | A |
4814146 | Brand et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816039 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4877429 | Hunter | Oct 1989 | A |
4883190 | Thomas, Jr. | Nov 1989 | A |
4891051 | Frantz | Jan 1990 | A |
4977745 | Heichberger | Dec 1990 | A |
5110328 | Yokota et al. | May 1992 | A |
5114441 | Kanner | May 1992 | A |
5125934 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5169006 | Stelzer | Dec 1992 | A |
5174796 | Davis et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5224350 | Mehra | Jul 1993 | A |
5234472 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5292990 | Kantner et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306331 | Auvil et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5354346 | Kumar | Oct 1994 | A |
5365011 | Ramachandran et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370728 | LaSala et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5486227 | Kumar et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5547641 | Smith et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5565018 | Baksh et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5672196 | Acharya et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5700310 | Bowman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5733451 | Coellner et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735938 | Baksh et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5750026 | Gadkaree et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769928 | Leavitt | Jun 1998 | A |
5779768 | Anand et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792239 | Reinhold, III et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807423 | Lemcoff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5811616 | Holub et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827358 | Kulish et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5882380 | Sircar | Mar 1999 | A |
5891217 | Lemcoff | Apr 1999 | A |
5906673 | Reinhold, III et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912426 | Smolarek. et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914294 | Park et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924307 | Nenov | Jul 1999 | A |
5935444 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5968234 | Midgett, II et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976221 | Bowman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997617 | Czabala et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007606 | Baksh et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011192 | Baker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023942 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053966 | Moreau et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063161 | Keefer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6096115 | Kleinberg | Aug 2000 | A |
6099621 | Ho | Aug 2000 | A |
6102985 | Naheiri et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6129780 | Millet et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6136222 | Friesen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147126 | DeGeorge et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152991 | Ackley | Nov 2000 | A |
6156101 | Naheiri | Dec 2000 | A |
6171371 | Derive et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176897 | Keefer | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179900 | Behling et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183538 | Naheiri | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194079 | Hekal | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210466 | Whysall et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231302 | Bonardi | May 2001 | B1 |
6245127 | Kane et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6284021 | Lu et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311719 | Hill et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345954 | Al-Himyary et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6398853 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402813 | Monereau et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6406523 | Connor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425938 | Xu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432379 | Heung | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436171 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6444012 | Dolan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444014 | Mullhaupt et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444523 | Fan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6444610 | Yamamoto | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451095 | Keefer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457485 | Hill et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6458187 | Fritz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464761 | Bugli | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471749 | Kawai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471939 | Boix et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488747 | Keefer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497750 | Butwell et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500234 | Ackley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500241 | Reddy | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500404 | Fernandez et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503299 | Baksh et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506351 | Jain et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514318 | Keefer | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6514319 | Keefer et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517609 | Monereau et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531516 | Davis et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533846 | Keefer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6565627 | Golden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565635 | Keefer et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565825 | Ohji et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6572678 | Wijmans et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579341 | Baker et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6593541 | Herren | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595233 | Pulli | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605136 | Graham et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607584 | Moreau et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6630012 | Wegeng et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6631626 | Hahn | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641645 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651645 | Nunez-Suarez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6660064 | Golden et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660065 | Byrd et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6692626 | Keefer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6712087 | Hill et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742507 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746515 | Wegeng et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752852 | Jacksier et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770120 | Neu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773225 | Yuri et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802889 | Graham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814771 | Scardino et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835354 | Woods et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6840985 | Keefer | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866950 | Connor et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889710 | Wagner | May 2005 | B2 |
6890376 | Arquin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893483 | Golden et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902602 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916358 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918953 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921597 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6974496 | Wegeng et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7025801 | Monereau | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027929 | Wang | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029521 | Johansson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7074323 | Ghijsen | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7077891 | Jaffe et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087331 | Keefer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094275 | Keefer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097925 | Keefer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112239 | Kimbara et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117669 | Kaboord et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122073 | Notaro et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7128775 | Celik et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144016 | Gozdawa | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160356 | Koros et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160367 | Babicki et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166149 | Dunne et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172645 | Pfister et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7189280 | Alizadeh-Khiavi et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7243679 | Thelen | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250073 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250074 | Tonkovich et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255727 | Monereau et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258725 | Ohmi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7276107 | Baksh et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279029 | Occhialini et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285350 | Keefer et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297279 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311763 | Neary | Dec 2007 | B2 |
RE40006 | Keefer et al. | Jan 2008 | E |
7314503 | Landrum et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7354562 | Ying et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7387849 | Keefer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390350 | Weist, Jr. et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404846 | Golden et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7438079 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449049 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456131 | Klett et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510601 | Whitley et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527670 | Ackley et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7553568 | Keefer | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578864 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7604682 | Seaton | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7637989 | Bong | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641716 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7645324 | Rode et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651549 | Whitley | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7674319 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7674539 | Keefer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687044 | Keefer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7713333 | Rege et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717981 | LaBuda et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722700 | Sprinkle | May 2010 | B2 |
7731782 | Kelley et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740687 | Reinhold, III | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744676 | Leitmayr et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744677 | Barclay et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758051 | Roberts-Haritonov et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758988 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763098 | Alizadeh-Khiavi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763099 | Verma et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7792983 | Mishra et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7793675 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806965 | Stinson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819948 | Wagner | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828877 | Sawada et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828880 | Moriya et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854793 | Rarig et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7858169 | Yamashita | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7862645 | Whitley et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867320 | Baksh et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7902114 | Bowie et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7938886 | Hershkowitz et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947118 | Rarig et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7947120 | Deckman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7959720 | Deckman et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016918 | LaBuda et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034164 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8071063 | Reyes et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8128734 | Song | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142745 | Reyes et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142746 | Reyes et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8192709 | Reyes et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210772 | Gillecriosd | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227121 | Adams et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8262773 | Northrop et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8262783 | Stoner et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268043 | Celik et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8268044 | Wright et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272401 | McLean | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8287629 | Fujita et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8319090 | Kitamura | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8337594 | Corma Canos et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8361200 | Sayari et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8361205 | Desai et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377173 | Chuang | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8444750 | Deckman et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449649 | Greenough | May 2013 | B2 |
8470395 | Khiavi et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8480795 | Siskin et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8512569 | Eaton et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8518356 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529662 | Kelley et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529663 | Reyes et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529664 | Deckman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529665 | Manning et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535414 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545602 | Chance et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8551444 | Agnihotri et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573124 | Havran et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591627 | Jain | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591634 | Winchester et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8616233 | McLean et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8657922 | Yamawaki et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8673059 | Leta et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8680344 | Weston et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8715617 | Genkin et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8752390 | Wright et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8753428 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8778051 | Weist, Jr. et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784533 | Leta et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784534 | Kamakoti et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784535 | Ravikovitch et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8790618 | Adams et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795411 | Hufton et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808425 | Genkin et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808426 | Sundaram | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8814985 | Gerds et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852322 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8858683 | Deckman | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8875483 | Wettstein | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8906138 | Rasmussen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8921637 | Sundaram et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8939014 | Kamakoti et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9005561 | Leta | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9017457 | Tammera | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9028595 | Sundaram et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9034078 | Wanni et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9034079 | Deckman et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9050553 | Alizadeh-Khiavi et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9067168 | Frederick et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9067169 | Patel | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9095809 | Deckman et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9108145 | Kalbassi et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9120049 | Sundaram et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9126138 | Deckman et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9162175 | Sundaram | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168483 | Ravikovitch et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9168485 | Deckman et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9272264 | Coupland | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9278338 | Coupland | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9358493 | Tammera et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9573116 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9597655 | Beeckman | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9737846 | Carstensen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744521 | Brody et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10040022 | Fowler et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10080991 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10080992 | Nagavarapu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10124286 | McMahon et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10322365 | Fowler | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20010047824 | Hill et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020053547 | Schlegel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020124885 | Hill et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162452 | Butwell et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030075485 | Ghijsen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030129101 | Zettel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131728 | Kanazirev et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145726 | Gueret et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030170527 | Finn et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188635 | Lomax, Jr. et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202918 | Ashida et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205130 | Neu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223856 | Yuri et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040020366 | Walker | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040099142 | Arquin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040118277 | Kim | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118747 | Cutler et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040197596 | Connor et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040232622 | Gozdawa | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050045041 | Hechinger et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050109419 | Ohmi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114032 | Wang | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129952 | Sawada et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050014511 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145111 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050150378 | Dunne et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050229782 | Monereau et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252378 | Celik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060017940 | Takayama | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060048648 | Gibbs et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060049102 | Miller et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076270 | Poshusta et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099096 | Shaffer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105158 | Fritz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116430 | Wentink et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116460 | Georget et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060162556 | Ackley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165574 | Sayari | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169142 | Rode et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060236862 | Golden et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070084241 | Kretchmer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070084344 | Moriya et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070222160 | Roberts-Haritonov et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253872 | Keefer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261550 | Ota | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261557 | Gadkaree et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283807 | Whitley | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080051279 | Klett et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072822 | White | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080128655 | Garg et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080202336 | Hofer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080282883 | Rarig et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282884 | Kelley et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282885 | Deckman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282886 | Reyes et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282887 | Chance | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080282892 | Deckman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080289497 | Barclay et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080307966 | Stinson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314550 | Greco | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090004073 | Gleize et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090014902 | Koivunen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025553 | Keefer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025555 | Lively et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037550 | Mishra et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090071333 | LaBuda et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079870 | Matsui | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090107332 | Wagner | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090151559 | Verma et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162268 | Hufton et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180423 | Kroener | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241771 | Manning et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284013 | Anand et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294366 | Wright et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090308248 | Siskin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090314159 | Haggerty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100059701 | McLean | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077920 | Baksh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089241 | Stoner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100186445 | Minta et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100212493 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100251887 | Jain | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100252497 | Ellison et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100263534 | Chuang | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100282593 | Speirs et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100288704 | Amsden et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110011803 | Koros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020202 | Gadkaree et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110031103 | Deckman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110067440 | Van Aken | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067770 | Pederson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110123878 | Jangbarwala | May 2011 | A1 |
20110146494 | Desai et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110217218 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110277620 | Havran et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291051 | Hershkowitz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296871 | Van Soest-Vercammen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308524 | Brey et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120024150 | Moniot | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120024152 | Yamawaki et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031144 | Northrop et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120067216 | Corma-Canos et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152115 | Gerds et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120222551 | Deckman | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222552 | Ravikovitch et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222553 | Kamakoti et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222554 | Leta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120222555 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255377 | Kamakoti et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272823 | Halder et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120308456 | Leta et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120312163 | Leta et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130061755 | Frederick et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130095996 | Buelow et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130225898 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140013955 | Tammera et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140060326 | Sundaram | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140157984 | Deckman et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140157986 | Ravikovitch et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140208797 | Kelley et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140216254 | Tammera et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150013377 | Oelfke | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150068397 | Boulet et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150101483 | Perry et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150196870 | Albright et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150328578 | Deckman et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160023155 | Ramkumar et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160129433 | Tammera et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160166972 | Owens et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160236135 | Tammera et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160332105 | Tammera et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160332106 | Tammera et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170056814 | Marshall et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170113173 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170113175 | Fowler et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170136405 | Ravikovitch et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170266604 | Tammera et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170282114 | Owens et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170341011 | Nagavarapu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170341012 | Nagavarapu et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180001301 | Brody et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180056229 | Denton et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180056235 | Wang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180169565 | Brody et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180169617 | Brody et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180339263 | Dehaas et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202376890 | Aug 2012 | CN |
0257493 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0426937 | May 1991 | EP |
0904827 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1674555 | Jun 2006 | EP |
2823872 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2550466 | Feb 1985 | FR |
2854819 | May 2003 | FR |
2924951 | Jun 2009 | FR |
58-114715 | Jul 1983 | JP |
59-232174 | Dec 1984 | JP |
60-189318 | Dec 1985 | JP |
2002-253818 | Oct 1990 | JP |
04-180978 | Jun 1992 | JP |
06006736 | Jun 1992 | JP |
H05-037318 | May 1993 | JP |
3477280 | Aug 1995 | JP |
2011-169640 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2011-280921 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-024445 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-348651 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2006-016470 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-036849 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2008-272534 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2014158997 | Feb 2013 | JP |
101349424 | Jan 2014 | KR |
2547115 | Apr 2015 | RU |
WO2002024309 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO2002073728 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO2005090793 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2010024643 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2011139894 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 16/252,975, filed Jan. 21, 2019, Krishna Nagavarapu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/258,266, filed Jan. 25, 2019, Barnes et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/263,940, filed Jan. 31, 2019, Johnson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/783,766, filed Dec. 21, 2019, Fulton et al. |
Allen, M. P. et al., (1987) “Computer Simulation of Liquids” Clarendon Press, pp. 156-160. |
Asgari, M. et al., (2014) “Designing A Commercial Scale Pressure Swing Adsorber For Hydrogen Purification” Petroleum & Coal, vol. 56(5), pp. 552-561. |
Baerlocher, C. et al., (2017) International Zeolite Association's “Database of Zeolite Structures,” available at http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/, downloaded Jun. 15, 2018, 1 page. |
Burtch, N.C. et al., (2015) “Molecular-level Insight into Unusual Low Pressure CO2 Affinity in Pillared Metal-Organic Frameworks,” J Am Chem Soc, 135, pp. 7172-7180. |
Beauvais, C. et al., (2004) “Distribution of Sodium Cations in Faujasite-Type Zeolite: A Canonical Parallel Tempering Simulation Study,” J Phys Chem B, 108, pp. 399-404. |
Cheung, O. et al., (2013) “Adsorption kinetics for CO2 on highly selective zeolites NaKA and nano-NaKA,” Appl Energ, 112, pp. 1326-1336. |
Cygan, R. T. et al., (2004) “Molecular Models of Hydroxide, Oxyhydroxide, and Clay Phases and the Development of a General Force Field”, J Phys Chem B, vol. 108, pp. 1255-1266. |
Deem, M. W. et al., (2009) “Computational Discovery of New Zeolite-Like Materials”, J Phys Chem C, 113, pp. 21353-21360. |
Demiralp, E., et al., (1999) “Morse Stretch Potential Charge Equilibrium Force Field for Ceramics: Application to the Quartz-Stishovite Phase Transition and to Silica Glass”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 82(8), pp. 1708-1711. |
Dubbeldam, D. et al. (2016) “RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials” Molecular Simulation, (published online Feb. 26, 2015), vol. 42(2), pp. 81-101. |
Dubbeldam, D., et al., (2013) “On the inner workings of Monte Carlo codes” Molecular Simulation, vol. 39, Nos. 14-15, pp. 1253-1292. |
Earl, D. J. et al., (2005) “Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives,” Phys Chem Chem Phys, vol. 7, pp. 3910-3916. |
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering and QuestAir (2008) “A New Commercialized Process for Lower Cost H2 Recovery—Rapid Cycle Pressure Swing Adsorption (RCPSA),” Brochure, 4 Pgs. |
Fang, H. et al., (2013) “First principles derived, transferable force fields for CO2 adsorption in Na-exchanged cationic zeolites,” Phys Chem Chem Phys, vol. 15, pp. 12882-12894. |
Fang, H., et al., (2012) “Prediction of CO2 Adsorption Properties in Zeolites Using Force Fields Derived from Periodic Dispersion-Corrected DFT Calculations,” J Phys Chem C, 10692, 116, ACS Publications. |
Farooq, S. et al. (1990) “Continuous Countercurrent Flow Model for a Bulk PSA Separation Process,” AIChE J., v36 (2) p. 310-314. |
FlowServe (2005) “Exceeding Expectations, US Navy Cuts Maintenance Costs With Flowserve GX-200 Non-Contacting Seal Retrofits,” Face-to-Face, v17.1, 8 pgs. |
Foster, M.D., et al. “A geometric solution to the largest-free-sphere problem in zeolite frameworks”, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 90, pp. 32-38. date not provided. |
Frenkel, D. et al., (2002) “Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications”, 2nd ed., Academic Press, pp. 292-301. |
Garcia, E. J., et al. (2014) “Tuning the Adsorption Properties of Zeolites as Adsorbents for CO2 Separation: Best Compromise between the Working Capacity and Selectivity”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 53, pp. 9860-9874. |
GE Oil & Gas (2007) “Dry Gas Seal Retrofit,” Florene, Italy, www.ge.com/oilandgas, 4 pgs. |
Harris, J. G. et al., (1995) “Carbon Dioxide's Liquid—Vapor Coexistence Curve and Critical Properties as Predicted by a Simple Molecular Model”, J Phys Chem, vol. 99, pp. 12021-12024. |
Hill, J. R. et al., (1995) “Molecular Mechanics Potential for Silica and Zeolite Catalysts Based on ab Initio Calculations. 2. Aluminosilicates”, J Phys Chem, vol. 99, pp. 9536-9550. |
Hopper, B. et al. (2008) “World's First 10,000 psi Sour Gas Injection Compressor,” Proceedings of the 37th Turbomachinery Symposium, pp. 73-95. |
Jain, S., et al. (2003) “Heuristic design of pressure swing adsorption: a preliminary study”, Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 33, pp. 25-43. |
Kim J. et al. (2012) “Predicting Large CO2 Adsorption in Aluminosilicate Zeolites for Postcombustion Carbon Dioxide Capture”, J. Am. Chem, Soc., vol. 134, pp. 18940-18940. |
Kärger, J., et al.(2012) “Diffusion in Nanoporous Materials” , Whiley-VCH publisher, vol. 1, Chapter 16, pp. 483-501. |
Kikkinides, E. S. et al. (1995) “Natural Gas Desulfurization by Adsorption: Feasibility and Multiplicity of Cyclic Steady States,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. V. 34, pp. 255-262. |
Lin, L., et al. (2012) “In silico screening of carbon-capture materials”, Nature Materials, vol. 1, pp. 633-641. |
Liu, Q. et al., (2010) “NaKA sorbents with high CO2-over-N2 selectivity and high capacity to adsorb CO2,” Chem Commun,, vol. 46, pp. 4502-4504. |
Lowenstein, W., (1954) “The Distribution of Aluminum in the Tetra-Hedra of Silicates and Aluminates” Am Mineral, 92-96. |
Neimark, A. V. et al., (1997) “Calibration of Pore Volume in Adsorption Experiments and Theoretical Models”, Langmuir, vol. 13, pp. 5148-5160. |
Palomino, M., et al. (2009) “New Insights on CO2-Methane Seapration Using LTA Zeolites with Different Si/Al Ratios and a First Comparison with MOFs”, Langmar, vol. 26(3), pp. 1910-1917. |
Patcas, F.C. et al.(2007) “CO Oxidation Over Structured Carriers: A Comparison of Ceramic Forms, Honeycombs and Beads”, Chem Engineering Science, v. 62, pp. 3984-3990. |
Peng, D. Y., et al., (1976) “A New Two-Constant Equation of State”, Ind Eng Chem Fundam, vol. 15, pp. 59-64. |
Pham, T. D. et al., (2013) “Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Adsorption on Cation-Exchanged SSZ-13 Zeolites”, Langmuir, vol. 29, pp. 832-839. |
Pophale, R., et al., (2011) “A database of new zeolite-like materials”, Phys Chem Chern Phys, vol. 13(27), pp. 12407-12412. |
Potoff, J. J. et al., (2001) “Vapor-Liquid Equilibria of Mixtures Containing Alkanes. Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen”, AIChE J, vol. 47(7), pp. 1676-1682. |
Rameshni, Mahin “Strategies for Sour Gas Field Developments,” Worley Parsons-Brochure, 20 pp. date not provided. |
Reyes, S. C. et al. (1997) “Frequency Modulation Methods for Diffusion and Adsorption Measurements in Porous Solids,” J. Phys. Chem. B. v101, pp. 614-622. |
Rezaei, F. et al. (2009) “Optimum Structured Adsorbents for Gas Separation Process”, Chem. Engineering Science, v. 64, pp. 5182-5191. |
Richardson, J.T. et al. (2000) “Properties of Ceramic Foam Catalyst Supports: Pressure Dop”, Applied Catalysis A: General v. 204, pp. 19-32. |
Robinson, D. B., et al., (1985) “The development of the Peng—Robinson Equation and its Application to Phase Equilibrium in a System Containing Methanol,” Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 24, pp. 25-41. |
Ruthven, D. M. et al. (1996) “Performance of a Parallel Passage Adsorbent Contactor,” Gas. Sep. Purif., vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 63-73. |
Stahley, J. S. (2003) “Design, Operation, and Maintenance Considerations for Improved Dry Gas Seal Reliability in Centrifugal Compressors,” Dresser-Rand, Tech. Paper 134, 15 pages. |
Santos, M. S (2011) “New Cycle configuration to enhance performance of kinetic PSA processes” Chemical Engineering Science 66, pp. 1590-1599. |
Snurr, R. Q. et al., (1993) “Prediction of Adsorption of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Silicalite from Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations with Biased Insertions”, J Phys Chem, vol. 97, pp. 13742-13752. |
Stemmet, C.P. et al. (2006) “Solid Foam Packings for Multiphase Reactors: Modelling of Liquid Holdup and Mass Transfer”, Chem. Engineering Research and Design, v. 84(A12), pp. 1134-1141. |
Suzuki, M. (1985) “Continuous-Countercurrent-Flow Approximation for Dynamic Steady State Profile of Pressure Swing Adsorption” AIChE Symp. Ser. v81 (242) pp. 67-73. |
Talu, O. et al., (2001), “Reference potentials for adsorption of helium, argon, methane, and krypton in high-silica zeolites,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 83-93, pp. 83-93. |
Walton, K. S. et al., (2006) “CO2 adsorption in Y and X zeolites modified by alkali metal cation exchange,” Microporous and Mesoporous Mat, vol. 91, pp. 78-84. |
Willems, T. F. et al., (2012) “Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials” Microporous Mesoporous Mat, vol. 149, pp. 134-141. |
Zukal, A., et al., (2009) “Isosteric heats of adsorption of carbon dioxide on zeolite MCM-22 modified by alkali metal cations”, Adsorption, vol. 15, pp. 264-270. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190366261 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62310289 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15450618 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16545667 | US |