This application claims the priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of European Patent application no. 17199331.4, filed on 31 Oct. 2017, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to an apparatus comprising a phase-locked loop. In particular, but not exclusively, it relates to a radar receiver or transceiver.
High performance automotive radar sensors for autonomous driving need to comply with stringent angular resolution requirements. Angular resolution relates directly to the system total antenna aperture, which in turn normally relates to the number of receive antennas and their localization with respect to each other.
To avoid so-called grating lobes in the angular response (i.e. false target detection at certain angular positions), it is necessary that the antennas be located not further than λ/2 from each other, with λ being the wavelength of carrier signal. In practice, aperture sizes in the range of 6λ to 10λ are common, which combined with the λ/2 criteria for each antenna leads to a number of antenna receiver elements between 12 and 20.
For a complete system realization, each RX antenna signal must be down-converted to baseband and then transferred to the digital domain using a respective analog-to-digital converter (ADC). Both the local oscillator signal used to down-convert the RX antenna signals and the sampling clock signal of the different ADCs must be phase-coherent and stable with respect to the corresponding signals of the other ADCs. Otherwise, errors in the angular position estimates are introduced during signal processing in the base-band, and the advantages of using a large array to increase sensor angular resolution may be lost.
Several integrated circuit chip-sets are available, offering down-conversion operation and flexibility for creating different sizes of antenna arrays. In addition to the example shown in
Aspects of the invention are set out in the accompanying claims. Combinations of features from the dependent claims may be combined with features of the independent claims as appropriate and not merely as explicitly set out in the claims.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided an apparatus comprising:
a first phase-locked loop comprising:
a phase detector, arranged to receive a reference clock signal and a feedback clock signal and to output a frequency control signal based on a phase difference between the reference clock signal and the feedback clock signal;
a variable-frequency oscillator arranged to output an oscillator signal having a frequency dependent on said frequency control signal;
first divider circuitry for generating said feedback clock signal by frequency-dividing said oscillator signal; and
second divider circuitry for generating an output clock signal by frequency-dividing said oscillator signal;
wherein a phase relation between said first divider circuitry and said second divider circuitry is adjustable to delay or advance said output clock signal relative to said feedback clock signal.
By enabling the output clock signal to be delayed or advanced relative to the feedback clock signal, the present invention enables compensation of timing differences due to delays in transmission of a reference clock signal between different elements of the apparatus, thereby improving clock synchronisation. In particular, the present invention enables compensation of timing delays due to PCB skew.
In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises an inverter for inverting said oscillator signal to generate an inverted oscillator signal, wherein:
one of said first divider circuitry and said second divider circuitry comprises a first master divider arranged to receive said oscillator signal;
the other one of said first divider circuitry and said second divider circuitry comprises a first slave divider arranged to selectively receive said oscillator signal or said inverted oscillator signal; and
said first slave divider is configured to re-clock a selected output of said first master divider based on said selected one of said oscillator signal and said inverted oscillator signal.
This enables one of the feedback clock signal or the output clock signal to be delayed by a step of half a period of the oscillator signal.
The output clock signal may be delayed or advanced relative to said feedback clock signal by a multiple of one half of a period of said oscillator signal.
Said first master divider and said first slave divider may each be configured to divide by 2.
In some embodiments, said first slave divider is configured to re-clock a selected one of four-phase outputs of said first master divider.
In some embodiments, said first slave divider comprises the same circuitry as said first master divider.
This may help to ensure equal delays at the master and slave dividers.
In some embodiments, said first master divider comprises a differential or semi-differential flip-flop.
This may enable outputs of opposite phase to be available without incurring a relative delay.
In some embodiments:
said one of said first divider circuitry and said second divider circuitry comprises a second master divider arranged to receive an output of said first master divider;
said other one of said first divider circuitry and said second divider circuitry comprises a second slave divider arranged to receive an output of said first slave divider, and
said second slave divider is configured to re-clock a selected output of said second master divider based on said output of said first slave divider.
In some embodiments:
said one of said first divider circuitry and said second divider circuitry comprises a third master divider arranged to receive an output of said second master divider;
said other one of said first divider circuitry and said second divider circuitry comprises a third slave divider arranged to receive an output of said second slave divider; and
said third slave divider is configured to re-clock a selected output of said third master divider based on said output of said second slave divider.
Said second master divider and said second slave divider may be each configured to divide by two.
Said third master divider and said third slave divider may be each configured to divide by two.
The output clock signal may have a frequency equal to one eighth of the frequency of the oscillator signal.
Said second divider circuitry may comprise at least one further divider.
The apparatus may further comprise circuitry for re-clocking said feedback clock signal based on said output clock signal.
This may enable adjustment of the output clock frequency relative to the feedback clock frequency by more than one period of the output clock frequency.
The reference clock signal may be received via a printed circuit board.
In some embodiments, the apparatus comprises:
a first integrated chip comprising:
In some embodiments, said apparatus comprises:
a second integrated chip, comprising:
wherein said first integrated chip is arranged to receive said reference dock signal from said second integrated chip.
The first phase-locked loop may comprise circuitry for buffering said reference clock signal.
The apparatus may be a radar receiver or transceiver.
In a radar receiver or transceiver, circuitry required for signal generation, transmission and/or reception may also be included in the first and/or second integrated chip.
The apparatus may be a phased-array radar receiver or transceiver.
Embodiments of the present invention will be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like reference signs relate to like elements and in which:
The “master” IC 14 provides a number of signals to the “slave” ICs 16, including: a local oscillator signal (LO) 20, used for the transmit (TX) amplifiers and receiver (RX) mixers (not shown in
The MCU 12 is connected to the master and slave ICs (14, 16) by SPI (serial peripheral interface) control lines (30) and digital lines (32), for example using CSI-2, LVDS or CIF formats, for receiving data from the ICs (14, 16).
In a typical configuration, each IC contains three operational transmit (TX) ports and four receiver (RX) ports. Thus the arrangement shown in
For optimal operation of the distributed radar system, it is important that these control and timing signals 56, 58, 60, 62 are synchronous across all receiver (RX) channels on different ICs 14, 16. ‘Synchronous’ means that the phase and/or active edges of the signals are aligned with each other, with the internal ports of each RX channel taken as the reference point.
For the next generation of highly-integrated radar sensors, in which signal generation, transmission, reception and digitization are integrated in a single monolithic die, a method to synchronize and stabilize the phase of the ADC clock 58 across different ICs 14, 16 is needed.
Printed circuit board (PCB) skews on synchronization signals transmitted between different chips 14, 16 potentially decrease the accuracy (“synchronicity”) of the local timing signals on different chips, thereby introducing errors in the data sent by the respective ADC 50 to the baseband processor (MCU) 12. More specifically, a shift in the sampling time moment of the ADC 50 translates into an equivalent error in the phase of the sampled signal output by the ADC 50. The error is proportional to the frequency of signal being sampled, leading to a frequency-dependent phase error component. This is undesirable, for several reasons.
In a phased array receiver, the relative phase of the signals received across several receivers indicates the angular position of a reflecting object with respect to the radar sensor. Therefore, if the accuracy of the received signal phases is compromised due to sampling moment deviations, due for example to a skew on the connecting line between two chips in the phased array receiver, an error is introduced in the estimation of the angular position of the reflecting object with respect to the radar sensor. This is obviously undesirable, as it decreases the angular detection performance of the radar sensor.
In applications in which two or more radar ICs 14, 16 must work together, the phases of the respective ADC clock signals 58 of each IC 14, 16 must be aligned within a tight tolerance. In this case, one of the ICs works as master IC 14, the other(s) as slave IC(s) 16.
The master IC 14 illustrated in
The slave IC 16 illustrated in
However, the PCB connection 124 between the master and slave ICs 14, 16 and the output and input buffers (not shown) leads to a time skew (i.e. time difference) τPCB, known as “PCB skew”, between the active edge of the respective sampling signals “Clock ADC” 158, 258 input to the respective ADCs 150, 250 of the master and slave ICs 14, 16. This causes the sampling moment of the ADC 250 of the slave IC 16 to be delayed with respect to the sampling moment of the ADC 150 of the master IC 14, typically by a few nanoseconds. As discussed above, this timing difference leads to an error on the relative phase of the digitized signal produced by the master and slave ADCs 150, 250.
To illustrate the effect of the PCB skew τPCB, the specified phase stability between RX channels usually requires the phase deviation to be contained within +/−2 degrees. For an intermediate frequency (IF) frequency of up to 10 MHz, a realistic yet small PCB skew of ˜1 ns leads to a 3.6 degree phase estimation error at the highest IF frequency, due to the shift in sampling moment. For the next generation of radar sensors with IF frequencies of up to 20 MHz, the same ins PCB skew will result in a 7.2 degree error in the phase estimation, which is much above the overall phase stability specification mentioned above. Therefore, it is necessary that systems with distributed ADCs incorporate means for correcting PCB skews.
To compensate for the time delay introduced by PCB skew τPCB, the PLL clock generators 108, 110, 208, 210 illustrated in
In addition, the master and slave ICs 14, 16 each include a timing engine 174, 274, which outputs a respective ‘Valid data’ signal 162, 262 to the corresponding decimation stage 52 and serial interface 54 (
The level-shifted oscillator signal is input into first divider circuitry 316, 318 for generating the feedback clock signal 308, in this case a 40 MHz feedback clock signal, by frequency dividing the oscillator signal. In this embodiment, the first divider circuitry 316, 318 is in the form of a feedback divider chain comprising a divide-by-8 cascaded divider 316, and a divide-by-15 cascaded divider 318. The level-shifted oscillator signal is also input into second divider circuitry 320 for generating an output clock signal 322, in this embodiment a 600 MHz output clock signal 322 for clocking the ADC 150, 250 of the respective IC 14, 16, by frequency dividing the oscillator signal. In this embodiment, the second divider circuitry 320 is in the form of a divider chain comprising a divide-by-8 cascaded divider 320. The 600 MHZ output clock signal 322 corresponds to the respective ADC clock signal 158, 258 (
The divide-by-8 divider 316 of the first divider circuitry 316, 318 (i.e. the divide-by 8 divider in the feedback loop of the PLL) is synchronized to the divide-by-8 divider 320 of the second divider circuitry since each one receives the level-shifted oscillator signal generated by the VCO 312 as its clock input. Importantly, the exact phase relation between the divide-by-8 divider 316 of the first divider circuitry and the divide-by-8 divider 320 of the second divider circuitry is adjustable to delay the feedback clock signal 308 relative to the output clock signal 322, by means of control inputs 324. Equivalently, this has the effect of advancing the output clock signal 322 relative to the feedback clock signal 308.
The skilled person will appreciate that further divide or multiply stages may be included between the output of the VCO 312 and the first and second divider circuitry 316, 318, 320.
The phase of the 600 MHz signal 317 output by the divide-by-8 divider 316 of the first divider circuitry (in the feedback loop) can be delayed (relative to the 600 MHz output clock signal 322 output by the divide-by-8 divider 320 of the second divider circuitry) from 0 to 15/16 of the time period T, where T=1/(600 MHz), in steps of ( 1/16)T, which corresponds to approximately 104 ps.
Since the divide-by-8 divider 316 is part of the feedback loop of the PLL, the phase relation between the 600 MHz signal 317 output by the divide-by-8 divider 316 and the 40 MHz feedback clock signal 308 is automatically fixed, that is, their rising edges will always coincide. When, as described above, the 600 MHz signal 317 output by the divide-by-8 divider 316 in the feedback path is delayed for a part of its period, the 600 MHz output clock signal 322 for the ADC 150, 250 becomes advanced with respect to the 40 MHz reference clock signal 306, as shown in
Using this arrangement for the PLL clock generator 108, 110, in the slave IC 16, the rising edge of the 600 MHZ output clock signal 322 in the slave IC can only be advanced with respect to the incoming 40 MHz reference clock signal 306. When, at the slave IC 16, a delay of the 600 MHz output clock signal 322 would be desired, the timing of the output clock signal 322 in the master IC 14 can be advanced instead.
The configuration shown in
In both embodiments (
The first master divider 320a receives the oscillator signal output by the level shifter 314 as its clock input (‘Mclk’). An inverter 330 receives the oscillator signal and outputs an inverted oscillator signal. A switching device 332 is provided for selecting between the oscillator signal and the inverted oscillator signal. The first slave divider 316a is arranged to selectively receive the oscillator signal or the inverted oscillator signal output from the switching device 332 as its clock input (‘Sclk’), dependent upon a control signal ‘skew0’ input to the switching device 332. By switching the clock input of the first divide-by-2 slave divider 316a between the normal and inverted phase of the oscillator signal, it is possible to obtain the finest skew step, i.e. % a period of the 4.8 GHz oscillator signal, or 104 ps. This corresponds to a shift of 1/16 of a period of the 600 MHz output clock signal 322.
In the complete divide-by-8 divider chain, three equal divide-by-2 stages are used, in which the master divide-by-2 divider 320a, 320b, 320c generates four phases, and the corresponding slave divider 316a, 316b, 316c re-clocks a selected one of these four phases, selected using a respective multiplexer 334a, 334b, 334c controlled by the control signals ‘skew0’, ‘skew1’, ‘skew2’, ‘skew3’ (collectively indicated as control signal 324 in
The master divide-by-two dividers 320a, 320b, 320c and the slave divide-by-two dividers 316a, 316b, 316c use the same circuit to guarantee equal delays. Each slave divide-by-2 divider 316a, 316b, 316c can be either regarded as a re-clocking circuit or as a gated divider. Functionally seen, it is re-clocking a selected output of the corresponding master divide-by-2 divider 320a, 320b, 320c with the slave clock ‘Sclk’, but circuit-wise it is exactly the same divider circuit in master as well as slave.
The embodiment shown in
When used as the master divide-by-2 divider 320a, the gate-input G of the first flip-flop 340 is set to 1 and the gate-input Gn of the second flip-flop 342 is connected to the inverted Q output of the first flip-flop 340 in order to align both semi-differential flip-flop halves 340,342 in opposite phase. When used as the slave divide-by-2 divider 316a, both the G and Gn gate inputs of the divider 316a are connected to the required signals selected by the multiplexer 334a from the four phase outputs of the master divider 320a based on the control signals ‘skew0’, ‘skew1’, ‘skew2’, ‘skew3’ determining the skew setting.
As mentioned above, the amount of skew compensation provided by the PLL clock generator 108, 110, 208, 210 is controlled via the control inputs 324, shown as ‘skew0’ . . . ‘skew3’ in
Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated than many modifications, including additions and/or substitutions, may be made within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
17199331 | Oct 2017 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6295328 | Kim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6774689 | Sudjian | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6798303 | Steinecke | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7061288 | Burgess | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7158603 | Sofianos | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20030189464 | Drapkin et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060132202 | Meltzer | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080106339 | Adlerstein | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129388 | Gonzalez | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080315960 | Waheed | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20150222275 | Reichelt | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150222278 | Reichelt | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160065227 | Ainspan | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170366190 | Leong | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180048323 | Yamauchi | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0828343 | Mar 1998 | EP |
WO-2007067631 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
CETECOM ICT Services, Test report No. 1-7342/14-01-02_AnnexB, Jul. 7, 2014. |
Maurer, L., “77 GHz SiGe Based Bipolar Tranceivers for Automotive Radar Applications—An Inductrial Perspective”, IEEE 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190131981 A1 | May 2019 | US |