Patent Grant
7350451
The present invention relates to missilery in general, and, more particularly, to missile launchers.
Multi-cell missile launchers are often used on ships and other military vehicles. Since it is an offensive weapon, a missile launcher is likely to be targeted by enemy combatants. If one of the missiles in a multi-cell missile launcher is hit by an enemy strike, it is possible that the missile will explode. The explosion of one of the missiles within a multi-cell missile launcher can trigger a chain reaction in which another missile within the launcher also explodes. While a ship, especially a larger one, might be able to withstand a strike from a single missile, the detonation of multiple missiles within a multi-cell missile launcher can destroy a ship.
To decrease the likelihood of a chain reaction, each individual cell in a multi-cell missile launcher is usually armored with an “anti-fratricide shield.” Conventional anti-fratricide shields are typically metal plates or sandwich panels that are located between missiles. As such, they add weight and expense and consume valuable space in the launcher.
The present invention provides an improved missile launcher that combines the functionality of an anti-fratricide shield with that of a gas management system. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, a plurality of gas-uptake ducts are arranged on a boundary that surrounds a missile, thereby providing a barrier to the propagation of blast energy and/or fragments across the boundary.
In the illustrative embodiment, the ducts are designed to attenuate some or all of the energy of a pressure wave propagating toward or away from the missile. Attenuation is accomplished by at least one of: deflecting some of the energy into a different direction; absorbing some of the energy; and converting some of the energy into another form of energy such as heat, etc. In addition, the ducts are designed to withstand impact of high-velocity fragments, such as those in motion due to the explosion of a missile. The ducts deflect and/or absorb and/or decelerate such fragments so as to limit damage to the missile below a missile damage threshold.
In some embodiments of the present invention, additional shielding capacity is added to the ducts by the addition of energy-absorbing material around the ducts.
For the purposes of this Specification, including the appended claims:
The heat signature due to a missile launch can often make a missile launcher one of the more detectable features of a warship. In addition, the launch of a missile generates significant noxious and/or toxic gas. In order to protect personnel, as well as reduce the heat signature of the missile launcher exhaust gas is vented away from the missile launcher by means of a gas management system.
A conventional gas management system includes a plenum for receiving exhaust gas from the launch cells, and a common uptake duct for venting the exhaust gas out of the plenum into the atmosphere away from the missile launcher. The uptake duct is typically quite large, since it must accommodate a significant amount of gas flow. As a result, the uptake duct consumes valuable space in the launcher, and can even supplant one or more potential launch cell sites and thus reduce the firepower of the warship.
An aspect of the present invention is the recognition that the functionalities of the uptake duct and anti-fratricide shield can be combined into a single system. A combination of these functionalities into a single system enables potential reduction of cost, weight, and space.
Each launch cell 102 comprises canister 104, missile 108, and armor 110. Canister 104 provides infrastructure for supporting the storage, transportation and launching of missile 108.
Armor 110 provides protection for missile 108 from explosions external to canister 104. For example, armor 110 decreases the likelihood of the detonation of missile 108 due to the explosion of a missile in an adjacent launch cell (i.e., missile “fratricide”). Anti-fratricide armor is disclosed by T. K. Shah, et al., in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/186,650 entitled “Apparatus Comprising Armor,” which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Armor 110 increases the size, weight and cost of each launch cell, however.
Common uptake 112 provides a route for venting exhaust gas generated during missile launch into the outside environment. In some cases, missile launcher 100 is mounted below the deck of a warship, and common uptake 112 conveys gas to an area above deck and away from personnel. In order for common uptake 112 to accommodate multiple missile launches, however, it must be sized sufficiently. Common uptake 112 can require significant space in missile launcher 100 reducing the number of launch cells, such as depicted in
Canister wall 204 is part of a missile canister that encloses missile 108 in well-known fashion.
Ducts 206 are mechanically supported by supports 208, and together ducts 206 provide a distributed uptake configuration for venting exhaust gas generated during the launch of missile 108. As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,584,882 entitled “Self-contained Canister Missile Launcher with Tubular Exhaust Uptake Ducts,” issued on Jul. 1, 2003 to D. C. Briggs, et al., ducts 206 are designed to resist exhaust pressure in hoop tension. A cylinder wall is stronger in hoop tension than in compression; therefore, ducts 206 can be made lightweight so as to reduce the size and weight of launch cell 200. Lightweight ducts, however, provide little or no resistance to externally applied forces such as those associated with the explosion of a missile in an adjacent launch cell.
Launch cell 302-1 (representative of all launch cells 302-1 through 302-6) comprises canister 304-1 missile 108-1, and ducts 306-1. As will be discussed below and with respect to
Plenum 106 comprises a chamber with six gas ports (not shown), one gas port for each launch cell. Launch cells 302-1 through 302-6 mount to plenum 106 to enable gas flow from canisters 304-1 through 304-6 into plenum 106 through the gas ports.
Plenum 106 receives gas from launch cells 302-1 through 302-6. The gas received by plenum 106 may be exhaust gas generated during launch of a missile or gas that outgases from a missile prior to launch.
Ducts 306-1 comprise steel tubes that have a circular cross-section. Ducts 306-1 are designed so that they collectively provide sufficient cross-sectional area to vent the high-pressure exhaust gas generated by missile 108-1 during launch. In similar fashion to the prior art, ducts 306-1 require sufficient hoop tensile strength to withstand the gas pressure generated within the ducts during the launch of missile 108-1. In contrast to the prior art, however, ducts 306-1 are meant to serve the dual purpose of forming a shield for missile 108-1 from damage caused by an explosion external to canister 304-1. Ducts 306-1 are also meant to form a shield to provide protection for adjacent missiles and/or nearby personnel from an explosion of missile 108-1 while within launch cell 302-1.
Ducts 306-1 protect missile 108-1 from damage caused by the pressure wave that results from the explosion and/or fragments cast toward missile 108-1 due to an explosion external to canister 304-1. In order to form a shield, therefore, ducts 306-1 must enable the attenuation of blast energy that reaches missile 108-1 and/or deflect, decelerate, or block damaging fragments cast toward missile 108-1 due to the explosion.
The blast energy can be reduced before it reaches missile 108-1 by:
Ducts 306-1, therefore, are subject to design constraints that enable them to provide means for one or more of (i), (ii), and (iii) above. In some embodiments, ducts 306-1 form a solid border that blocks the radial propagation of the pressure wave. In some other embodiments, ducts 306-1 comprise a wall thickness sufficient to block some of the radial propagation of the pressure wave, while also deforming inwardly (i.e., crumpling) to convert blast energy into heat or otherwise “consume” blast energy. In some other embodiments, ducts 306-1 comprise a wall thickness sufficient to confine the blast energy within canister 304-1. In still some other embodiments, ducts 306-1 comprise fins that are appropriately configured to explosively weld when exposed to blast energy, thereby consuming a portion of the blast energy.
Canister 402-1 is a circular missile enclosure as is well-known in the prior art.
Shield 406-1 comprises twenty-eight of ducts 306-1, which lie on boundary 404-1. Each of ducts 306-1 comprises a steel tube that has a circular cross-section. Duct 306-1 has an outer diameter substantially equal to 6 inches and a wall thickness substantially equal to 0.25 inches.
Ducts 306-1 are arranged on boundary 404-1 to prevent a portion of external pressure wave 408-1 from propagating through boundary 404-1. As a result, internal pressure wave 410-1 is limited to a level below a damage threshold of missile 108-1.
Shield 412-1 comprises ducts 306-1 and damping material 414. Ducts 306-1 are arranged on boundary 404-1. The volume of shield 412-1 between ducts 306-1 is filled with energy-absorbing material 414 to further enhance the energy attenuation-capability of shield 412-1.
In the alternative embodiment, damping material 414 is a thermally-stable gelatin, however other suitable damping materials include, without limitation: sand, non-flammable gas, silicon gel, pumice, and water. In some alternative embodiments, damping material 414 retards the spread of fire.
Although shield 412-1 forms a continuous border that surrounds canister 402-1, in some alternative embodiments, shield 412-1 forms a discontinuous border. In some other alternative embodiments, shield 412-1 is located within canister 402-1.
Shield 416 provides protection from an explosion in launch cell 302-2 for missile 108-1, and protection from an explosion in launch cell 302-1 for missile 108-2. Shield 416 is formed when launch cells 302-1 and 302-2 are mounted in multi-cell launcher 300, thereby tiling three of ducts 306-1 and three of ducts 306-2 together. Since only half of the ducts that compose shield 416 are included in each launch cell, the size, weight, and cost of each launch cell are reduced. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, how to make and use alternative embodiments of the present invention that comprise:
Projections 510 are steel projections that are disposed at an acute angle from the outer surface of cylindrical wall 500. Projections 510 are appropriately configured to explosively weld when exposed to blast energy. Projections 510 will be described below and in reference to
The triangular cross-section of duct 512 provides a different nesting capability than that of a duct with a cylindrical cross-section. In some embodiments, a triangular duct provides a higher strength-to-weight ratio than ducts of other cross-sectional shapes for a comparable exhaust capacity, thereby enabling a lighter and/or smaller and/or cheaper launch cell.
Spline 602 is a steel strip suitable for mounting to the outer surface of cylindrical wall 500. Spine 602 may be mounted to cylindrical wall by welds, rivets, or screws.
Fins 604 are steel tabs affixed to spline 602. Prior to exposure to blast energy and as depicted in
Explosive welding induces changes to both the macro- and micro-structure of projections 510. One change at the micro level is that the welded material (at least near the welding interface) is “hardened” relative to its pre-welded state. In this hardened state, the materials are better able to resist penetration by blast fragments. Since the propagation of blast fragments lags the pressure wave created by the explosion, the fragments encounter the “hardened” welded structure rather than the pre-welded structure. As a result, a reduced number of blast fragments propagate beyond the first layer, relative to what would otherwise be the case.
It is notable that in the prior art, an enhanced ability to contain blast fragments would come at the expense of additional weight or require the use of exotic materials. And, of course, the weight and price penalties of additional and/or exotic materials must be paid whether or not this extra protection is used; that is, whether or not there is a strategic hit on a missile within a multi-cell launcher. But this is not the case with embodiments of the present invention, wherein the enhanced ability comes as a serendipitous result of the process of explosive welding. In other words, the enhanced ability is not present until it is needed, and it's provided at no additional “cost.”
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the present invention and that many variations of the above-described embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, in this Specification, numerous specific details are provided in order to provide a thorough description and understanding of the illustrative embodiments of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of those details, or with other methods, materials, components, etc.
Furthermore, in some instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the illustrative embodiments. It is understood that the various embodiments shown in the Figures are illustrative, and are not necessarily drawn to scale. Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” or “some embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment(s) is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, but not necessarily all embodiments. Consequently, the appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” or “in some embodiments” in various places throughout the Specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. It is therefore intended that such variations be included within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2792962 | Granfelt | May 1957 | A |
| 3319522 | Gould et al. | May 1967 | A |
| 4222484 | Howe | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4286708 | Porzel | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4604939 | Hoffmeister et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4649018 | Waltersdorf et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4747350 | Szecket | May 1988 | A |
| 4842182 | Szecket | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4887761 | Hardwick | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4934241 | Piesik | Jun 1990 | A |
| 5158173 | Halsey et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5206450 | Piesik | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5837919 | Yagla et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6230604 | Larson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6422514 | Clark et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6526860 | Facciano et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6584882 | Briggs et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6971300 | Kunstmann | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7066320 | Sansolo | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 20060021497 | Paul et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060096449 | Williams et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080041222 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
