Apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of a pump element

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6280147
  • Patent Number
    6,280,147
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 14, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 28, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A metering pump includes an apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of a pump element. The apparatus comprises a lever having a cam which is contacted by the pump element.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates generally to pumps, and more particularly to an apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of a pump element.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Often, it is necessary in an industrial or other process to inject a measured quantity of a flowable material into a further stream of material or a vessel. Metering pumps have been developed for this purpose and may be either electrically or hydraulically actuated.




Conventionally, an electromagnetic metering pump utilizes a linear solenoid which is provided electrical pulses to move a diaphragm mechanically linked to an armature of the solenoid. As the solenoid is energized and deenergized, the armature and the diaphragm are reciprocated in suction and discharge strokes over a range of positions. Referring to

FIG. 1

, during each suction stroke, liquid is drawn upwardly through a first fitting


51


past a first check valve


53


and enters a diaphragm recess


55


. A second check valve


57


is closed during the suction stroke. During each discharge stroke, the first check valve


53


is closed and the second check valve


57


is opened, thereby allowing the liquid to travel upwardly past the second check valve


57


and a fitting


59


and outwardly of the pump


21


.




A stroke length adjustment member sets the stroke length of the armature


31


(i.e., the distance the armature travels during each suction and discharge stroke). As shown in

FIG. 1

, the stroke length adjustment member is conventionally a combination of a screw


40


and a knob


42


. The armature


31


rests against an end of the screw


40


at the end of each suction stroke. The position of the end of the screw


40


, and thus the stroke length, can be adjusted by manually rotating the knob


42


in either a first or second direction.




When the pump is not operating, however, the screw


40


can be rotated to shorten the stroke length only when the armature


31


is spaced from the end of the screw


40


, i.e., when the armature is not at the end of a suction stroke. This is because the screw


40


is not capable of providing the required mechanical force to change the stroke length when the armature


31


is in contact with the end of the screw


40


.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, a metering pump includes an apparatus for manually adjusting the stroke length of a pump element.




More particularly, in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a pump includes a pump element having a stroke length movable within a range of positions, a circuit for modulating electrical power to a power unit in dependence upon the position of the pump element and an apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of the pump element including a lever wherein the apparatus contacts the pump element at a position within the range of positions to determine the stroke length of the pump element.




Preferably, the pump element includes an armature and the pump further includes a sensor for detecting the position of the pump element. Also preferably, the pump further includes a processor responsive to the sensor for applying electrical power to the pump in dependence upon the position of the pump element.




In addition, the lever preferably includes a first portion which is manually operable and a second portion. The apparatus may also include a cam having a stop surface that is coupled to the second portion of the lever, wherein the stop surface contacts the pump element to determine the stroke length of the pump element. The cam may be coupled to the second portion of the lever by a cap nut and the lever may be coupled to a bracket also by a cap nut. The first portion of the lever may include a locking surface. Furthermore, movement of the lever in a first direction decreases the stroke length of the pump element and movement of the lever in a second direction increases the stroke length of the pump element.




In the preferred embodiment, the pump comprises an electromagnetic metering pump.




In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a metering pump having a power unit and an armature movable over a stroke length comprises a sensor for detecting armature position and a driver circuit coupled to the power unit and delivering electrical power to the power unit. A programmed processor is responsive to the sensor for controlling the driver circuit such that electrical power is delivered to the power unit in dependence upon the position of the armature. An apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of the armature includes a lever having a first portion which is manually operable, a second portion and a cam coupled to the second portion. The cam includes a stop surface having a position which is variable as a function of the position of the first portion of the lever wherein the position of the stop surface determines the stroke length.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is an elevational view partially in section, of an electromagnetic metering pump utilizing a prior art stroke adjustment apparatus;





FIGS. 2 and 3

are waveform diagrams illustrating head pressure, armature position and applied pulse waveform at 100 psi and 40 psi system pressure, respectively, for the pump illustrated in

FIG. 12

;





FIG. 4

is a block diagram of a circuit for controlling the metering pump of

FIGS. 12 and 13

;





FIGS. 5

,


6


, and


7


, when joined along the similarly lettered lines, together comprise a flowchart of programming executed by the microprocessor of

FIG. 4

;





FIGS. 8 and 9

are idealized graphs illustrating armature force as a function of armature position for the pump of

FIGS. 12 and 13

;





FIG. 10

is a schematic diagram of the circuit of

FIG. 4

;





FIG. 11

is an end elevational view of an electromagnetic metering pump incorporating the present invention;





FIG. 12

is a partial sectional view taken generally along the lines


12





12


of

FIG. 11

wherein the armature of the pump is at the end of a discharge stroke and the lever of the stroke adjustment apparatus is set to a zero stroke length;





FIG. 13

is a view similar to

FIG. 12

wherein the armature of the pump is at the end of a suction stroke and the lever of the stroke adjustment apparatus is set to a substantially maximum stroke length;





FIG. 14

is an enlarged fragmentary view partly in section of the adjustment apparatus taken generally along the lines


14





14


of

FIG. 11

; and





FIG. 15

is an enlarged, fragmentary, side elevational view of the stroke adjustment apparatus.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring now to

FIGS. 12 and 13

, there is illustrated an electromagnetic metering pump


20


which may incorporate the present invention. The metering pump


20


includes a main body


22


joined to a liquid end


24


. The main body


22


houses an electromagnetic power unit (EPU)


26


that comprises a coil


28


and a movable armature


30


. The EPU


26


further includes a pole piece


32


which, together with the coil


28


and the armature


30


form a magnetic circuit. The armature


30


is biased to the left by at least one, and preferably a plurality of circumferentially spaced return springs


34


such that, when no excitation is provided to the coil


30


, the armature


30


rests against a cam


208


. It should be noted that the armature is preferably balanced in the horizontal position; i.e., the return springs disposed between the 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock positions (when viewed from the side relative to the position shown in

FIG. 12

) exert lesser biasing forces than the return springs disposed between the 4 o'clock and 8 o'clock positions. This arrangement results in less wear of the bearings supporting the armature and less slip-stick so that less current is required to move the armature within the desired operational constraints.




A shaft


44


is coupled to and moves with the armature


30


. The shaft


44


is in turn coupled to a pump diaphragm


46


which is sealingly engaged between the main body


22


and the liquid end


24


. As the coil


28


is energized and deenergized, the armature


30


, the shaft


44


and the diaphragm


46


are reciprocated. During such reciprocation, liquid is drawn upwardly through a first fitting


50


past a first check valve


52


and enters a diaphragm recess


54


. The liquid then continues to travel upwardly past a further check valve


56


and a fitting


58


and outwardly of the pump


20


.




A position sensor


60


is provided having a shaft


62


in contact with the armature


30


and develops a signal representative of the position of the armature


30


. If desired, the position sensor


60


may be replaced by one or more transducers which develop signals representing the differential between the pressure encountered by the diaphragm


46


and the fluid pressure at the point of liquid injection from the pump. In this case, the power supplied to the coil


28


is controlled so that this pressure difference is kept low but will still finish the discharge stroke within a desired length of time.




A pulser circuit


64


is provided in a recess


66


. As seen in

FIG. 4

, the pulser comprises a number of circuit components including a microprocessor


68


which is responsive to a zero detection circuit


70


and which develops signals for controlling a driver circuit


72


. Referring also to

FIG. 10

, the microprocessor


68


develops control signals which are supplied via an input IN of an opto-isolator


73


to cross-connected switching elements, such as SCR's Q


1


and Q


2


or other devices such as IGBT's, power MOSFET's or the like. Resistors R


1


-R


5


, diodes D


1


and D


2


and capacitor C


1


provide proper biasing and filtering as needed. The SCR's Q


1


and Q


2


provide phase controlled power which is rectified by the full wave rectifier comprising diodes D


3


-D


6


and supplied to the coil


28


. If desired, the microprocessor


68


may instead control the driver circuit


72


to supply pulse width modulated power or true variable DC power to the coil


28


.





FIGS. 2 and 3

illustrate the operation of the metering pump shown in

FIGS. 12 and 13

at 100 psi system pressure and 40 psi system pressure, respectively (the system pressure is the liquid pressure at the point of injection of a liquid delivered by the pump


20


into a conduit containing a further pressurized liquid). As illustrated by each of the waveform diagrams of

FIGS. 2 and 3

, half-wave rectified pulses are appropriately phase controlled (i.e., either a full half-wave cycle or a controllably adjustable portion of a half-wave cycle) and are applied to the coil


28


as a function of position and speed of the armature


30


(as detected by the sensor


60


) so that only enough power is supplied to the coil


28


to move the armature


30


the entire stroke length without wasting significant amounts of force and energy and generating significant amounts of heat. In the waveform diagrams of

FIG. 2

, the head pressure (i.e, the pressure to which the diaphragm


46


is exposed) varies between 20 psi and 130 psi as the armature moves over the stroke length. In the case of the waveform diagrams of

FIG. 3

, the head pressure varies between 12 psi and 60 psi as the armature


30


moves over the stroke length. In both cases, half-wave rectified sinusoidal pulses are initially applied to the coil


28


wherein the pulses are phase controlled to obtain pulse widths that result in a condition just short of or just at saturation of the EPU


26


. Thus, the armature


30


is accelerated as quickly as possible without significant heat generation and dissipation. Thereafter, narrower pulses are applied as the armature


30


moves toward its travel limit.

FIGS. 8 and 9

illustrate the tracking of developed EPU force with system pressure as a function of armature position for the pump of

FIGS. 12 and 13

. It can be seen that relatively little power is wasted, and hence, noise is reduced (because the armature does not slam into the pole piece


32


at the end of the stroke) as are generated heat levels.




Referring again to

FIG. 4

, the EPU driver receives the AC power from a power supply unit


74


, which also supplies power to the microprocessor


68


and a signal measurement interface circuit


76


that receives an output signal developed by the position sensor


60


. The zero detect circuit


70


detects zero crossings in the AC waveforms and provides an interrupt signal to the microprocessor


68


for purposes hereinafter described.




In addition to the foregoing, the microprocessor may be coupled to a keypad


80


and a display


82


, as well as other input/output (I/O) circuits


84


as desired or required. The microprocessor


68


(not shown) is suitably programmed to execute a control routine, a portion of which is illustrated in

FIGS. 5

,


6


and


7


. The software of

FIGS. 5

,


6


, and


7


is operable in response to interrupts provided to the microprocessor


68


by the power supply unit


74


to synchronize the operation of the microprocessor


68


to the pulses delivered to the EPU driver


72


. The balance of the software executed by the microprocessor


68


(not shown) determines when the software illustrated in

FIGS. 5

,


6


and


7


should be executed. This decision may be made in response to an initiation signal developed by a user or by apparatus which is responsive to some operational parameter of a process or in response to any other signal.




Referring first to

FIG. 5

, once the microprocessor


68


determines that the software illustrated by

FIGS. 5

,


6


and


7


is to be executed, a block


96


checks the output of the signal measurement circuit


76


to detect the position of the armature


30


. A block


98


then operates the signal measurement interface circuit


76


to sense the magnitude of the AC voltage supplied by the power supply unit


74


. Thereafter, a block


100


checks to determine whether a flag internal to the microprocessor


68


has been set indicating that pumping has been suspended. If this is not the case, a block


102


checks to determine whether a stroke of the armature


30


is already in progress. If this is not true, a block


108


checks to determine whether the armature


30


has returned to its rest position under the influence of the return springs


34


. This is determined by checking the output of the position sensor


60


and the signal measurement circuit


76


. If this is not the case, control returns to the block


100


when the next interrupt is received. Otherwise, control passes to a block


110


, which initializes a variable HWC (denoting half wave cycle number) to a value of zero.




Following the block


110


, a block


112


determines the length of the stroke to be effected as set by a stroke length adjustment apparatus described hereinafter. Based upon stroke length and stroke rate, a block


114


calculates a maximum average power level APMAX which is not to be exceeded during the stroke as follows:






APMAX
=


CPMAX
*
SPMMAX
*
SLAMAX


SPM
*
SLA












where CPMAX is a stored empirically-determined value representing the maximum continuous power allowed at maximum stroke length (SLAMAX), maximum stroke rate (SPMMAX) and maximum pressure. (SLAMAX and SPMMAX are stored as well.) SPM is the actual stroke rate which may be determined and input by a user or which may be a parameter set by an external device. SLA is the stroke length as determined by the block


112


.




The value of APMAX represents the maximum power to be applied to the coil


28


beyond which no further useful work will result (in fact, a deterioration in performance and heating will occur). Following the block


114


, a block


116


initializes variables TSP (denoting total stroke power), SEC (a stroke end counter which is incremented at the end of the stroke) and SFC (a stroke fail counter which is incremented at the end of a failed stroke) to zero.




Following the block


116


, and following the block


102


if it has been determined that a stroke is already in progress, a block


118


increments the value of HWC by one and control passes to a block


120


, FIG.


6


. The block


120


checks to determine whether the value of HWC is less than or equal to three. If this is found to be true, control passes to a block


122


which reads a value MAXHWCOT stored in the microprocessor


68


and representing the maximum half wave cycle on time (i.e., the maximum half wave pulse width or duration). This value is dependent upon the frequency of the AC power supplied to the power supply unit


74


.




A block


124


then establishes the value of a variable HWCOTSTROKE (denoting half wave cycle on time for this stroke) at a value equal to MAXHWCOT less a voltage compensation term VCOMP and less a stroke length adjustment term SLA. It should be noted that either or both of VCOMP and SLA may be calculated or determined in accordance with empirically-derived data and/or may be dependent upon a parameter. For example, each of a number of positive and/or negative empirically-determined values of VCOMP may be stored in a look-up table at an address dependent upon the value of the AC line voltage magnitude as sensed by the block


98


of FIG.


5


. The term SLA may be determined in accordance with the stroke length as set by the lever


202


. Specifically, each of a number of empirically-determined values of SLA may be stored in a look-up table at an address dependent upon the stroke length determined by the block


112


. Following the block


124


, a block


126


operates the EPU driver circuit


72


so that a half-wave rectified pulse of duration determined by the current value of HWCOTSTROKE is applied to the coil


28


.




Thereafter, a block


128


calculates the total power applied to the coil


28


by the block


126


and a block


130


accumulates a value TSP representing the total power applied to the coil


28


over the entire stroke. The value TSP is equal to the accumulated power of the previous pulses applied to the coil


28


during the current stroke as well as the power applied by the block


126


in the current pass through the programming.




If the block


120


determines that the value of HWC is greater than 3, a block


140


checks to determine whether the position of the armature


30


is greater than 90% of the total stroke length (in other words, the block


140


checks to determine whether the armature


30


is within 10% of the end of travel thereof). If this is not true, the value HWCOT is calculated by a block


142


as follows:






HWCOT=HWCOTSTROKE−CORR






Each of a number of values for the term CORR in the above equation may be stored in a look-up table at an address dependent upon the distance traveled by the armature


30


since the last cycle, the current position of the armature


30


as well as the current value of HWC (i.e., the number of half-waves that have been applied to the coil


28


during the current stroke). The function of the block


142


is to reduce the power applied during each cycle as the stroke progresses. Thereafter, a block


144


operates the driver


72


to apply a half-wave rectified pulse, appropriately phase controlled in accordance with the value of HWCOT, to the coil


28


. Following the block


144


, control passes to the block


128


.




If the block


140


determines that the position of the armature


30


is within 10% of the stroke length, a block


146


controls the EPU driver


72


to apply a voltage to the coil


28


sufficient to hold the coil at the end of travel. Preferably, this value is selected to provide just enough holding force to keep armature


30


at the end of travel limit but is not-so high as to result in a significant amount of wasted power. Following the block


146


, a block


148


increments the stroke end counter SEC by one and control passes to the block


128


.




Once the current cycle power and the total stroke power have been calculated by the blocks


128


and


130


, a block


150


checks to determine whether the value of HWC is less than or equal to a maximum half-wave cycle value MAXHWC stored by the microprocessor


68


. If this is true, control passes to a block


152


,

FIG. 7

, which checks to determine whether the current value stored in the stroke end counter SEC is greater than or equal to 4. If this is not true, control passes back to the block


100


of

FIG. 5

upon receipt of the next interrupt. On the other hand, if SEC is greater than or equal to 4, control passes to a block


154


which checks to determine whether the current calculated total stroke power TSP is less than or equal to the maximum average power calculated by the block


114


of FIG.


5


. If this is also true, a flag is set by a block


156


indicating that the current stroke has been completed successfully. A block


158


then removes power from the coil


28


so that the armature


30


can be returned under the influence of the return springs


34


to the retracted position in abutment with either or both of a stroke bracket


36


and the stroke adjustment apparatus described below.




If the block


154


determines that the total stroke power exceeds the value of the maximum average power calculated by the block


114


, a flag is set by a block


160


indicating that the current stroke has been completed unsuccessfully and a block


162


increments the stroke fail counter by 1. Thereafter, a block


164


checks to determine whether the stroke fail counter SFC has a current value greater than 5. If this is true, a flag is set indicating that the current stroke has been placed in the suspended mode by a block


166


and a block


168


starts a timer which is operable to maintain the suspended mode flag for a certain period of time, such as 30 seconds. Control then returns at receipt of the next interrupt to the block


100


,

FIG. 5

, following which a block


170


checks to determine whether the 30 second timer has expired. Once this occurs, a block


172


clears or resets the suspended mode flag.




Following the block


172


, or following the block


170


if the 30 second timer has not expired, control returns to the block


100


upon receipt of the next interrupt.




If the block


164


determines that the current value of the stroke fail counter SFC is not greater than 5, control passes at receipt of the next interrupt to the block


100


of FIG.


5


.




As should be evident, the effect of the foregoing programming is initially to apply three half-wave rectified pulses phase controlled in accordance with the value of VCOMP and SLA to the coil


28


and thereafter apply half-wave rectified pulses which have been phase controlled in accordance with the equation implemented by the block


142


of FIG.


6


. In general, the pulse widths are decreased during this interval until a stroke length of 90% is reached and thereafter the holding power is applied to the coil


28


. As pulses are applied to the coil


28


, the power applied to the coil during the stroke is accumulated and, if the power level exceeds the maximum average power level, a conclusion is made that the stroke has been completed unsuccessfully. If five or more strokes are unsuccessfully completed, further operation of the pump


20


is suspended for 30 seconds.




Referring again to

FIGS. 11-15

, a stroke length adjustment apparatus


200


according to the present invention includes a lever


202


having a manually adjustable first portion


204


and a second portion


206


disposed transverse to, and preferably perpendicular to the first portion


204


. The first portion


204


of the lever


202


may have a plurality of locking teeth


205


for the purpose described hereinafter.




The apparatus


200


further includes a cam


208


having a stop surface


210


carried by the second portion


206


of the lever


202


. The cam


208


includes a cylindrical mounting portion


209


having a bore


211


therethrough. A threaded end


207


of the second portion


206


of the lever


202


is inserted through the bore


211


and an aperture


213


in the stroke bracket


36


until a shoulder


216


of the lever


202


contacts a first surface


218


of the cam


208


and a second surface


219


of the cam


208


contacts a wall


220


surrounding the aperture


213


of the bracket


36


. A cap nut


212


is then threaded on the end


207


of the second portion


206


to capture the cam


208


on the lever


202


and to capture the lever


202


on the bracket


36


. Specifically, the cap nut


212


prevents the second portion


206


from being withdrawn upwardly (as seen in

FIG. 14

) owing to the interference of the outer periphery of the cap nut


212


with the bracket


36


while downward movement of the second portion


206


(as seen in

FIG. 14

) is prevented by the interference of the cam


208


with the bracket


36


.




As seen in

FIG. 15

, the stop surface


210


has an eccentric (or other) shape such that manual movement of the lever changes the position of the stop surface


210


relative to the armature


30


. This adjustment, in turn, causes the stroke length of the armature


30


to change. For example, if the user moves the first portion


204


of the lever


202


in a first direction (e.g., downwardly as seen in FIG.


15


), the stroke length is decreased, and if the user moves the first portion


204


of the lever


202


in the opposite direction (i.e., upwardly as seen in FIG.


15


), the stroke length is increased.




In the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 14 and 15

, at least the first portion


204


of the lever


202


is preferably fabricated of a deformable plastic and includes at least one and preferably a plurality of locking teeth


205


. The teeth


205


may be disposed on the first portion


204


opposite a plurality of teeth


230


disposed on a wall


37


as well as around the first portion


204


as shown in FIGS.


12


and


13


. When no external force is exerted against the first portion


204


(e.g., by an operator of the pump) the teeth


205


firmly engage the teeth


230


.




To move the lever


202


, the locking teeth


205


of


5


the lever must first be disengaged from the teeth


230


on the wall


37


. To do so, the first portion


204


of the lever


202


is deformed in a first direction away from the teeth


230


and transverse to the upward and downward directions as seen in

FIGS. 11-13

. As the lever


202


is moved in this first direction, the teeth


205


and


230


disengage or unlock, thereby allowing the lever


202


to be adjusted. Once a desired stroke length has been selected (i.e., once the lever has been moved in the upward or downward direction), the operator may release and allow the first portion


204


to return to the original position thereof such that the teeth


205


of the lever


202


re-engage the teeth


230


of the wall


37


, thereby locking the lever


202


at the selected stroke length.




If desired, the lever


202


may instead be spring-loaded to cause the first portion to be normally spring-biased into engagement with the teeth


230


, and to permit limited movement of the lever


202


so that adjustment of the stroke length may be effected.




In order to calibrate the pump, the cap nut


212


is first loosened to permit the cam


208


to be rotated. The armature


30


is then moved to the fully extended position (i.e., to the right-most position as seen in

FIG. 13

) and the lever


202


is moved to the fully downward position (see FIG.


15


). The cam


208


is then rotated until it contacts the armature


30


and the cap nut


212


is tightened to maintain the cam


208


in such position.




The mechanical advantage afforded by the lever


202


and the cam


208


reduces the mechanical force required to change the stroke length. Hence, the lever


202


may be operated at any time, as opposed to the knob


42


and screw


40


combination of

FIG. 1

, which, when the pump is not operating, may be operated only when the armature


30


is spaced from the screw


40


. Thus, a user may more easily adjust the stroke length.




The present invention is not limited to use with an electromagnetic metering pump. The stroke length adjustment apparatus could instead be used to control the stroke length of any other suitable device, as desired. In addition, the cam


208


may be integral with the lever


202


and the lever


202


may be mounted to the pump using any other suitable apparatus.




Numerous modifications to the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the foregoing description. Accordingly, this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is presented for the purpose of enabling those skilled in the art to make and use the invention and to teach the best mode of carrying out same. The exclusive rights of all modifications which come within the scope of the appended claims are reserved.



Claims
  • 1. A metering pump, comprising:a pump element having a stroke length movable within a range of positions; a circuit for modulating electrical power to a power unit in dependence upon the position of the pump element; and an apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of the pump element including a lever; wherein the apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of the pump element contacts the pump element at a position within a range of positions to determine the stroke length of the pump element.
  • 2. The metering pump of claim 1, wherein the pump element includes an armature.
  • 3. The metering pump of claim 1, further comprising a sensor for detecting the position of the pump element.
  • 4. The metering pump of claim 3, further comprising a processor responsive to the sensor for applying electrical power to the pump in dependence upon the position of the pump element.
  • 5. The metering pump of claim 1, wherein the lever includes a first portion which is manually operable and a second portion.
  • 6. The metering pump of claim 5, wherein the apparatus for controlling the stroke length of the pump element includes a cam having a stop surface that is coupled to the second portion of the lever, wherein the stop surface of the cam contacts the pump element to determine the stroke length of the pump element.
  • 7. The metering pump of claim 6, wherein the cam is coupled to the second portion of the lever via a cap nut.
  • 8. The metering pump of claim 5, wherein the first portion of the lever includes a locking surface.
  • 9. The metering pump of claim 1, wherein the lever is coupled to a bracket.
  • 10. The metering pump of claim 9, wherein the lever is coupled to the bracket via a cap nut.
  • 11. The metering pump of claim 1, wherein movement of the lever in a first direction decreases the stroke length and movement of the lever in a second direction increases the stroke length.
  • 12. The metering pump of claim 1, wherein the pump comprises an electromagnetic metering pump.
  • 13. A metering pump having a power unit and a movable armature having a stroke length, comprising:a sensor for detecting armature position; a driver circuit coupled to the power unit and delivering electrical power to the power unit; a programmed processor responsive to the sensor for controlling the driver circuit such that electrical power is delivered to the power unit in dependence upon the position of the armature; and an apparatus for adjusting the stroke length of the armature including, a lever having a first portion which is manually operable and a second portion; a cam coupled to the second portion of the lever including a stop surface having a position which is variable as a function of the position of the first portion of the lever, wherein the position of the stop surface determines the stroke length.
  • 14. The metering pump of claim 13, wherein the second portion of the lever is secured to the cam via a cap nut.
  • 15. The metering pump of claim 13, wherein the second portion of the lever is secured to a bracket via a cap nut.
  • 16. The metering pump of claim 13, wherein the first portion of the lever includes a locking surface.
  • 17. The metering pump of claim 13, wherein movement of the lever in a first direction decreases the stroke length and movement of the lever in a second direction increases the stroke length.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/170,438, filed Oct. 13, 1998, entitled “Pump Control and Method of Operating Same”.

US Referenced Citations (45)
Number Name Date Kind
3602246 Hettinger et al. Aug 1971
3715174 Davis et al. Feb 1973
3723840 Opal et al. Mar 1973
3855515 Hutchins, Jr. Dec 1974
3984315 Ernst et al. Oct 1976
4147824 Dettmann et al. Apr 1979
4195662 Gottel Apr 1980
4285497 Guttel Aug 1981
4291358 Dettmann et al. Sep 1981
4473338 Garmong Sep 1984
4523902 Wally Jun 1985
4534539 Dettmann Aug 1985
4578626 Richter Mar 1986
4661751 Werner Apr 1987
4718824 Cholet et al. Jan 1988
4811624 Fritsch Mar 1989
4839571 Farnham et al. Jun 1989
4841404 Marshall et al. Jun 1989
4966528 Henkel et al. Oct 1990
4994984 Massimo Feb 1991
5013990 Weber May 1991
5015153 Uesugi et al. May 1991
5040567 Nestler et al. Aug 1991
5054522 Kowanz et al. Oct 1991
5056036 Van Bork Oct 1991
5096643 Kowanz et al. Mar 1992
5120199 Youngs et al. Jun 1992
5141402 Bloomquist et al. Aug 1992
5204595 Opal et al. Apr 1993
5249932 Van Bork Oct 1993
5260175 Kowanz et al. Nov 1993
5269659 Hampton et al. Dec 1993
5372482 London et al. Dec 1994
5543108 Bacher et al. Aug 1996
5545012 Anastos et al. Aug 1996
5549456 Burrill et al. Aug 1996
5551664 Boke Sep 1996
5641270 Sgourakes et al. Jun 1997
5650709 Rotunda et al. Jul 1997
5653422 Pieloth et al. Aug 1997
5711346 Pieloth et al. Jan 1998
5718567 Rapp et al. Feb 1998
5746079 Hettinger et al. May 1998
5762097 Hettinger et al. Jun 1998
5779218 Kowanz Jul 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
42 30 662 A1 Sep 1991 DE
0 294 858 A2 Dec 1988 EP
0 483 447 A2 May 1992 EP
1 567 041 May 1980 GB
2108212 A May 1983 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Product Brochure “Meeting Pumps”, LMI Milton Roy, Jun. 1998.
Product Brochure “Meeting Pumps and Accessories” created in Oct. 1992 for Liquid Metronics Division of Milton Roy.
International Search Report, PCT/US99/23136, May. 24, 2000.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/170438 Oct 1998 US
Child 09/550351 US