Several methods for producing images in the air are known. In skywriting, typically one or more airplanes disperse smoke from behind the airplane as it maneuvers. This trail of smoke forms the image as viewed by an observer. Atmospheric conditions will cause the smoke to disperse, limiting the complexity (e.g., size, shape, color) of images that may be formed using this technique. In addition, images formed from skywriting are not visible in the dark. The efficiency of a system is defined as the total time and cost necessary to display an image at a targeted location. Skywriting is relatively inefficient since it requires an airplane to take off, fly to an intended message position, and then create the image.
Cloud painting offers an alternative to skywriting. In cloud painting, typically a high-powered light is used to project an image onto an existing cloud where light reflects off the cloud toward the observer. Since the light source and observer are both on the same side of the imaging surface, we refer to this herein as front-projection. This technique is more efficient than skywriting and increases the complexity of the image that can be displayed. However, cloud painting can only project an image onto an existing cloud and therefore is not functional when the sky is clear. The ability to project an image at any location is defined as the flexibility of the system. An airplane can be used to produce a smoke cloud at an ideal location, thereby increasing flexibility, but at the expense of efficiency.
In addition, the brightness of the image is reduced as the light beam travels through the atmosphere due to scattering effects. Brightness is inversely proportional to the distance the beam traverses from the source to the observer. Therefore, the higher the altitude of the cloud, the dimmer the image will appear. Also, the higher the altitude of the cloud, the larger the projected image needs to be to appear as the same size when projected on a lower altitude cloud. To form a larger image, the light source must be spread over a larger area, resulting in a further reduction of brightness. Available light sources are not bright enough to compete with direct sunlight, and therefore cloud painting is typically not possible during daylight conditions.
An alternative to cloud painting is image projection onto a water screen. In general, a water screen is produced by spraying a controlled stream of water droplets or water vapor into the air to form a thin screen. To maintain the screen, a continuous supply of water is necessary, along with an apparatus to control the size and position of the water droplets. Water screens suffer from similar flexibility and efficiency constraints as cloud painting.
The proposed system efficiently and flexibly produces a directed image in air. For example, in trying to warn an incoming boat that the boat is on a collision course with another watercraft, the warning must be delivered efficiently (prior to the collision) to a flexible location (near the incoming craft) so the message is clearly directed at the incoming boat even though others in the area may see the projected image.
Additional aspects and advantages will be, in part, set forth in the description which follows and, in part, will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice.
The inventors propose an image projection system to communicate an image into the air, including a screen generation device, a delivery device, and a light projecting device. The delivery device launches the screen generation device from a launch location to a targeted screen location in the air. The screen generation device disperses screen material particles in the air to form a projection screen. The screen generation device is comprised of screen material particles and a mechanism to disperse the particles. The light projecting device directs light from a projection location onto the projection screen to form the image so as to be visible from an observation location of a viewer.
The delivery device may be any mechanism capable of transmitting the screen generation device to the desired screen location. The delivery device may be a pneumatic launcher or a pyrotechnic lifting charge, for example.
The screen material particles may be formed of a material such that an image can be projected onto or through them. The screen material particles (particles) are of such size, shape, and density that the particles stay suspended in the air when the particles are dispersed from the screen generation device long enough to communicate an image onto the screen. The particles may be salt particles or glass micro-spheres, for example. The particles may fluoresce when illuminated by non-visible wavelengths of light.
The screen generation device may include a single pyrotechnic charge to disperse the screen material particles or may include a primary charge to disperse a plurality of independent screen generation units, which in turn independently disperse the particles. Alternatively, the screen generation device may include a non-explosive mechanism to disperse the screen material particles using rotational forces and/or airflow for example.
The screen generation device may include the plurality of screen generation units. As the size of the screen that can be generated using a single pyrotechnic charge may be limited in practice by the momentum that can be imparted on the individual screen material particles, a plurality of screen generation units is used in an embodiment to overcome the limitation. Since each of the screen generation units has greater mass than the individual screen particles, more momentum can be imparted on the screen generation units, resulting in separation distances greater than the size of a screen produced by a single charge. Each of the screen generation units is then able to generate a portion of the total screen, resulting in a larger screen possible than can be achieved with a single charge.
The light projecting device may project light onto a rear side or a front side of the screen with respect to the observation location of the viewer. The light projecting device may use incoherent or coherent light sources. The light projecting device may emit wavelengths other than visible light (e.g., UV). For example, ultraviolet light is attenuated less than visible light when transmitted through fog, and thus may be used to reach a screen comprised of material that fluoresces in the visible portion of the spectrum near the intended observer, which extends the range of utility of the embodiment in dense fog conditions.
The light projecting device may form the image by shining light through a sheet or plate that contains the image thereon. The light projecting device may form the image by scanning a light beam to draw the image.
These together with other aspects and advantages which will be subsequently apparent, reside in the details of construction and operation as more fully hereinafter described and claimed, reference being had to the accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
So that those of ordinary skill in the art to which the subject invention pertains will more readily understand how to make and use the systems described herein, embodiments of the invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings, wherein:
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures for the purpose of describing, in detail, embodiments of the present invention. The figures and accompanying detailed description are provided as examples of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims appended hereto.
Referring to
The shell 30 is loaded into the launcher 10, a firing solution is computed based on the relative motion of a launcher 10 and the observer 90, the launcher's 10 azimuth and elevation are adjusted to aim the shell 30, and an electronic match may be programmed with a time delay from launch to create a screen at an intended point in the parabolic flight path of the screen generation device, i.e., the shell 30.
Referring to
The screen material that is to be dispersed includes, for example, glass micro-spheres, salt particles or any other translucent or transparent particles. The screen material particles (particles) are of such size, shape, and density that the particles stay suspended in the air when the particles are dispersed from the screen generation device long enough to communicate an image onto the screen.
Referring now to
After the screen 50 is formed, the image 70 from a light projecting device 60, such as a projector, is aimed onto a rear side (a sender side) of the projection screen 50 with respect to an observation position of a viewer. The light is projected onto the screen 50 from a projection location of the light projecting device 60 and forms an inverse image in the air, the inverse image being a mirror image of an intended image which is intended to be displayed to a viewer, for example, at an observation position. The screen 50 formed by the screen material particles is positioned between the light projecting device 60 and the observer 90 such that the observer 90 is able to see the intended image in a rear projection configuration. However, the invention is not limited to rear projection. The light projecting device 60 may project light onto a front side of the screen 50 with respect to the observation position.
The light projecting device 60 may include an incoherent or coherent light source emitting incoherent or coherent light. In the case of use of an incoherent light source, the light source may be aimed upwards to facilitate cooling. The system may further include a mirror in this case to redirect the image onto the screen 50. The mirror may also be used to compensate for vibration of the projector, which may cause the position of the image to vary on the screen 50. In the case of use of a coherent light source, the light may be narrowly focused to limit the loss of intensity due to spreading. The system may further include a mirror in this case to control the position of the beam, allowing the image to be created by sweeping the beam back and forth in a pattern to create the desired image.
The light projecting device 60 may be a source that emits wavelengths other than visible light. The projector and screen may be used where the projection light is other than visible light (i.e., UV). Ultraviolet light is attenuated less than visible light when transmitted through fog, and thus may be used to reach a screen comprised of material that fluoresces in the visible portion of the spectrum near the intended observer, which extends the range of utility of the embodiment in dense fog conditions. When using non-visible wavelengths for projection, the screen material particles used may be opaque to visible wavelengths.
The light projecting device 60 may pass light through a filter, for example, a gobo, a sheet or a plate, that contains the image to be displayed thereon such that the intended image is presented. The gobo may comprise a painted glass plate that allows light to pass through the plate, the light being of any color or shape, such that an arbitrary image is allowed to be presented. Dynamic image filters, such as light valves or liquid crystals, may be used, thereby permitting animated images to be displayed. Similarly, a mechanical system can rapidly shutter and switch the presented image plates, also resulting in an animation. Incoherent light may be preferably used in order to avoid eye-safety issues.
In practice, the size of the screen that can be generated by a single screen generator 30 is limited by the momentum that can be imparted on the screen material particles. To produce a larger screen, a plurality of screen generation units may be housed in a single pyrotechnic shell with a primary charge to disperse the individual screen generation units.
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring to
As seen in
The screen generation device may include flash-bang charges for either the primary charge 21 dispersing the screen generation units 22 or the dispersion charge within each screen generation unit 22. Flash-bang charges create a flash of light and loud noise to attract attention to the screen 55. Alternatively, the screen generation device may include a non-explosive mechanism to disperse the screen material particles using rotational forces and/or airflow.
Those having ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that technologies that spawn from warning system projects will have application outside of these projects. For example, image projection systems onto a targeted and free-floating screen may be used for entertainment purposes as part of a fireworks display, advertisement system, etc.
Although a few embodiments have been shown and described, it would be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes might be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the claims and their equivalents.
This non-provisional application claims the benefit of co-pending provisional application bearing application No. 60/898,398, filed Jan. 31, 2007, and entitled “CLAWS: CONTACT LOCALIZATION AND ADAPTIVE WARNING SYSTEM.” The entire contents of the provisional application are incorporated by reference herein.
The government has certain rights in this invention by virtue of Contract Number HSCG32-06-C-R00017 awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
620592 | Just | Mar 1899 | A |
1935084 | Edwards | Nov 1933 | A |
2827831 | Elion | Mar 1958 | A |
3334816 | Mizuno | Aug 1967 | A |
3786498 | Lipe | Jan 1974 | A |
3949212 | Larrimore | Apr 1976 | A |
4007690 | Wildridge | Feb 1977 | A |
4904982 | Lieb | Feb 1990 | A |
4974779 | Araki | Dec 1990 | A |
5012757 | Williams | May 1991 | A |
5019822 | Kirkland | May 1991 | A |
5067653 | Araki | Nov 1991 | A |
5261344 | Pickett | Nov 1993 | A |
5315285 | Nykerk | May 1994 | A |
5450058 | Collier | Sep 1995 | A |
5580140 | Katz | Dec 1996 | A |
5871267 | Wende | Feb 1999 | A |
6388949 | Lenhardt | May 2002 | B1 |
6402045 | Persson | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6473005 | Showell | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6731429 | Lunde | May 2004 | B2 |
6733134 | Bleiner | May 2004 | B2 |
6765487 | Holmes | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6819487 | Palovuori et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6857746 | Dyner | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6985212 | Jamieson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997558 | Perlin et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7082706 | Stinis | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20020171039 | Bennett | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186149 | Knaak | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030137412 | Pan | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060098272 | Lerner | May 2006 | A1 |
20060208867 | McLoughlin | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070068053 | Troitski | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 22 951 | Feb 1994 | DE |
450331 | Jul 1936 | GB |
0058238 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2004075132 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080180798 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60898398 | Jan 2007 | US |