The present invention relates to an apparatus for applying a sheet of fabric across a surface of a roof deck and the method of using the apparatus.
In the waterproofing industry many coating systems are applied with rolled fabric embedded in the coating to reinforce seams or cracks in the existing substrate. Generally, this is performed on a smooth surface where directly unrolling the fabric and removing any wrinkles on the roll is relatively easy and “straight forward”. However, there are other surfaces like a metal deck, where the surface profile is more complex, an as a consequence the process of applying the fabric is time consuming. Moreover, to make it worst even with a light wind, this process becomes extremely difficult and almost impossible to perform without sacrificing the quality in the final product.
Many styles of surface profiles are currently available on the market provided by different manufacturer with different specifications. Also, there are instances where the profiles can differ dimensionally (even on the same site) sometimes due to poor handling during installation and/or foot traffic after the installation.
There are two methods commonly used in the market to perform the coating operation:
Method 1
This method is generally slow and labor intensive. In this method, coating is applied to the deck by either: a brush, a roller or spray equipment. The fabric is then unrolled and placed in the coating, where immediately 2 or 3 workers will resolve and/or brush out the wrinkles. An additional worker recoats the fabric and it is then allowed to dry.
Method 2
The second method although quick, typically has reduced surface quality, and has a number of safety issues in terms of full OSHA compliance. In this method a worker sprays directly from overhead applying the coating to the substrate. While the substrate is still wet, a second worker walks quickly backwards (almost running) unspooling the fabric directly over the profile. Simultaneously, the original worker sprays the fabric down over the profile with the force of the spray to effectively recoat the fabric. This complete operation must be closely coordinated so that the original layer of coating does not dry before embedding the fabric and the unrolling and re-spraying of the fabric must happen within 8 inches to 12 inches of each other. Finally, single directional spraying over a multi-angled profile does not allow for an even coating application.
In the coating application field, whether in roof coating or car painting, the key is a timely, even coat that sufficiently covers the entire surface. Most people will typically refer to a proper “application technique”, particularly when discussing spray applications (but viable with rollers, and brushes as well). Even for those people knowledgeable and experienced about the proper application technique is almost impossible to maintain that level of technique throughout the day because of various obstacles, physical tiredness and lack of concentration. Average variances of up to 400% have been found on single jobs with instances of even greater variance.
Attaining a high and constant precision application as reasonable under the existing conditions is particularly important in the waterproofing field, because except for specific circumstances, the applied waterproofing will wear off/deteriorate at the same rate across the entire exposed surface. So, an uneven application will reach full deterioration sooner in the thinner locations yet delayed (with arguably wasted coating product) at the thicker locations.
To better understand the importance of attaining a high and constant precision application lets first look at some of the variables that might occur during a typical application.
Brushes/Brooms
Using brushes and brooms greatly slows down the process and will limit the area covered. Also, more already dried edges are accumulated that will in turn get recoated and the coating build up is thus, doubled. Add to that the fact that natural contours are left by the bristles (ranging depending on the quality), and a truly uneven surface application is achieved.
Rollers
Rollers, although probably quicker than using brooms (and thus less of the edge drying/recoating condition) also leave a “textured” finish. The final product would look something like the moon surface with craters and ridges, not necessarily dramatic to the eye, but radically disproportionate with 3 mils (dry) in the craters and typically 7-9 mils (dry) on the ridges.
The recent desire to maintain highly reflective roofs and building exteriors is also hindered by this texture since dirt and moisture are retained in the craters reducing the long-term reflectivity of the installed waterproofing. Additionally, the typical installation leaves twice as much coating following the saturation of the roller leading up to the worker deciding if more paint on the roller is needed.
Hand Spraying
Spraying by hand resolves a number of the previously explained issues. There is less texturing, the work progresses quickly so there is less overlapping on an already dries edge, and a worker that can maintain a good spray technique can apply a reasonably even coat to approximately 15,000 square feet per 8 hour period. The problem is that this technique must be maintained for the full 8 hours. One of the most common variables encountered with this technique is the tip distance to the application surface. This variance happens in many forms as a worker swings the gun side to side the extended distance to the surface must be accounted for. If the gun is swung front to back the spray “fan” becomes close on one side (edge) than the other. If a rib profile is sprayed from the side, the opposite side of the rib is shadowed, if a rib is sprayed from directly overhead (downward) the taper of the rib profile and the ever expanding “fan” from the spray tip interact to apply less paint on the sides of the rib compared to other areas (in fact there will also be naturally more paint on the flat top surface of the rib, than the flat surface of the roof deck directly below). These events coupled with wrist fatigue (fighting with 3000 psi coating ejection at the tip), maintaining concentration over a long period of time and under rough weather conditions, and normal human error adds up as accumulated variance.
Thus, what is needed is an efficient and easy-to-operate apparatus and a method for quickly applying a sheet of fabric across a surface of a roof deck using the same.
The apparatus of the invention in conjunction with the spraying unit will unroll the fabric, form it to the shape of the existing profile, and embed the fabric in the applied coating. Not only does the method greatly enhance the quality of the installation providing fewer wrinkles and bubbles, but also its construction greatly protects the roof deck against the effects of the environment. The apparatus of the invention requires fewer workers to operate and sequentially organizes every step reducing safety issues.
Further features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures showing illustrative embodiments of the invention, in which:
Throughout the figures, the same reference numbers and characters, unless otherwise stated, are used to denote like elements, components, portions or features of the illustrated embodiments. The subject invention will be described in detail in conjunction with the accompanying figures, in view of the illustrative embodiments.
The apparatus of the invention will be now explained in conjunction with
As can be seem on
In a preferred embodiment, the mold blocks 11 and the mould block 10 are made of wood or a similarly hard but workable material. The mould blocks 11 are clamp them together and from the back end (last block) the exact profile of the deck profile is traced or transferred. Measuring then from the bottom of the mould to the top of the traced profile a line is draw across the face of the first block at that same height. The remaining blocks are then carved or shaped to manipulate the fabric between those two forms (i.e.: the sheet of fabric 8 will come off of the straightening bar perfectly horizontal and that is how it will enter the first mold). After making the transition the sheet of fabric 8 will exit the last mold in the form of the profile. The transition must be smooth, consistent, slow (or timed with the characteristic of the fabric). It is important to ensure that the edges of the mould blocks 11 must be rounded so they do not catch on the sheet of fabric 8. Moreover, it is preferred that the front edge of each block is rounded so that if one is up and one is down for some reason, the sheet of fabric 8 does not snag. For that purpose, 120 to 100 grit sanding is usually sufficient and the fabric passing over during use typically maintains the necessary smoothness.
As shown in
An important aspect of the invention is the almost every component of the apparatus 1 can be selectively adjusted. The mould box 10 has a height positioning adjustment along its sides so that the distance from the existing deck profile can be adjusted if necessary. This is particularly necessary due to the position of the straightening bar 9 so that it clears fastener heads that may protrude from the roof deck, but without being too far from the profile and creating other difficulties. The wheel width is also adjustable so as to advantageously use the varying profile spacing as guides. In a preferred embodiment, the apparatus 1 holds 4″-8″ fabric in a small version. However, since larger fabrics directly influence wheel spacing the dimensions of the apparatus 1 are custom built to the fabric size necessary. Since construction panels vary greatly in their fabricated design, their profile shape and the spacing between profiles, the wheelbase and the moulds blocks are provided adjustable and of differing designs.
A spraying unit that can be used alone or in combination with the apparatus 1 will be explained in conjunction with
According to a preferred embodiment, the adjusting arms that support the sprayer tips 17 must be adjustable in height, lateral spacing from center, distance forward from the base, and be able to tilt at the head for directional spraying. The vertical extension arms should also pivot allowing for additional spacing between the tips and off-set positioning. The above-explained adjustments are controlled by selectively manipulating adjusting elements 18-21 as shown in
In the specific case of using the spray unit in conjunction with the apparatus 1 as will be explained later (and for the follow-up saturation coat to that same fabric), the tips can be spread apart and tilted to face directly at the rib-sides; coating more thoroughly, and adding additional security to an important part of the installed system. In addition, with the adjustable wheel span, on many roof surfaces the contour of the deck can be used as a guide and with proper tip settings the overlap is adjustable and minimal with precision similar to products currently available on the market. Using the sprayer unit of the present invention provides additional advantages in regards to safety. The worker would rarely need to cross the 6′ perimeter of OSHA guidelines. Since the sprayer unit of the invention provides high stability and ease of operation, its use imposes much less stress on the arm and wrist and the worker can vary his position without affecting productivity or quality throughout the day. According to a preferred embodiment, the sprayer unit must have a minimum of four wheels to guide precisely and to remain stable. The wheel spacing (side to side) could also be adjusted for either added stability and or to adjust to the spacing of the deck ribs. The apparatus 1 (in conjunction with the spraying unit) will unroll the fabric, form it to the shape of the existing profile, and embed the fabric in the applied coating. Not only does the method greatly enhance the quality of the installation (fewer wrinkles and bubbles), but also its construction greatly protects against the effects of the environment.
In operation, a worker would manipulate the apparatus 1 by allowing the apparatus to stand on its nose (90 degree position) to allow access to the underside for starting and finishing the length of the profile as shown in
Although the present invention has been described herein with reference to the foregoing exemplary embodiment, this embodiment does not serve to limit the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains will appreciate that various modifications are possible, without departing from the technical spirit of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2176891 | Crom | Oct 1939 | A |
3096225 | Carr | Jul 1963 | A |
3625804 | Losey | Dec 1971 | A |
3900102 | Hurst | Aug 1975 | A |
3935353 | Doerfling | Jan 1976 | A |
3954544 | Hooker | May 1976 | A |
3996396 | Hansen | Dec 1976 | A |
4016323 | Volovsek | Apr 1977 | A |
4087296 | Hooker | May 1978 | A |
4221628 | Rosenberg | Sep 1980 | A |
4233356 | Jacobs | Nov 1980 | A |
4421581 | Olsen | Dec 1983 | A |
4442148 | Stierli | Apr 1984 | A |
4535920 | Troup | Aug 1985 | A |
4545847 | Schneller | Oct 1985 | A |
4737213 | Paeglis | Apr 1988 | A |
4742992 | Allen | May 1988 | A |
4761201 | Nichols, Jr. | Aug 1988 | A |
4799982 | Vicino | Jan 1989 | A |
5072097 | Miller | Dec 1991 | A |
5381597 | Petrove | Jan 1995 | A |
5591289 | Souders | Jan 1997 | A |
5670178 | West | Sep 1997 | A |
5766395 | Bainbridge | Jun 1998 | A |
5927609 | Scarpa | Jul 1999 | A |
5964418 | Scarpa | Oct 1999 | A |
6136379 | Scarpa | Oct 2000 | A |
6416854 | Hunter, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6458423 | Goodson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6586080 | Heifetz | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6679018 | Georgeau | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6864195 | Peng | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6955012 | Suzuki | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7249443 | Faulkner | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7261933 | Gorowicz | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7631678 | Cartier | Dec 2009 | B2 |
8245475 | Thomson | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8262833 | Dyal | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8701367 | Georgeau | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20020004346 | Hunter, Jr. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030051419 | Suzuki | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030145546 | Georgeau | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040033741 | Peng | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040107662 | Georgeau | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050210808 | Larson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060237994 | Ludwig | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070266660 | Davies | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080010933 | Faulkner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080210382 | Cartier | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090017226 | Dyal | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20110000611 | Marzouki | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110097485 | Breeden | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120198787 | Mo | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140239546 | Santoni | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150118401 | Baker | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61767427 | Feb 2013 | US |