The subject matter of this application is related to the subject matter of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/341,595, filed Dec. 22, 2008, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/603,734, filed Oct. 22, 2009, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/109,427, filed Oct. 29, 2008, to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/562,797, filed Sep. 18, 2009, and to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/651,113, filed Dec. 31, 2009.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system and method for the application of hardfacing to portions of a drill bit using robotic apparatus.
2. State of the Art
In the exploration of oil, gas, and geothermal energy, wells or boreholes in the earth are created in drilling operations using various types of drill bits. These operations typically employ rotary and percussion drilling techniques. In rotary drilling, the borehole is created by rotating a drill string having a drill bit secured to its lower end. As the drill bit drills the well bore, segments of drill pipe are added to the top of the drill string. While drilling a drilling fluid is continually pumped into the drilling string from surface pumping equipment. The drilling fluid is transported through the center of the hollow drill string and through the drill bit. The drilling fluid exits the drill bit through one or more nozzles in the drill bit. The drilling fluid then returns to the surface by traveling up the annular space between the well bore and the outside of the drill string. The drilling fluid transports cuttings out of the well bore as well as cooling and lubricating the drill bit.
The type of drill bit used to drill the well will depend largely on the hardness of the formation being drilled. One type of rotary rock drill is a drag bit. Early designs for a drag bit included hardfacing applied to various portions of the bit. Currently, designs for drag bits have extremely hard cutting elements, such as natural or synthetic diamonds, mounted to a bit body. As the drag bit is rotated, the cutting elements form the bottom and sides of the well bore.
Another typical type of rotary drill bit is the tri-cone roller drill bit that has roller cones mounted on the body of the drill bit, which rotate as the drill bit is rotated. Cutting elements., or teeth, protrude from the roller cones. The angles at which the roller cones are mounted on the bit body determine the amount of “cut,” or “bite” of the bit with respect to the well bore. As the roller cones of the drill bit roll on the bottom of the hole being drilled, the teeth or carbide inserts apply a high compressive and shear loading to the formation causing fracturing of the formation into debris. The cutting action of roller cones comprises a combination of crushing. chipping and scraping. The cuttings from a roller cone drill bit typically comprise a mixture of chips and fine particles.
Yet another type of rotary drill bit is a hybrid drill bit that has a combination of hard cutting elements, such as natural or synthetic diamonds and roller cones mounted on the body of the drill bit.
There are two general types of roller cone drill bits; TCI bits and steel-tooth bits. “TCI” is an abbreviation for Tungsten Carbide Insert. TCI roller cone drill bits have roller cones having a plurality of tungsten carbide or similar inserts of high hardness that protrude from the surface of the roller cone. Numerous styles of TCI drill bits are designed for various types of formations, in which the shape, number and protrusion of the tungsten carbide inserts on the roller cones of the drill bit will vary, along with roller cone angles on the drill bit.
Steel-tooth roller cone drill bits are also referred to as milled-tooth bits because the steel teeth of the roller cones are formed by a milling machine. However, in larger bits, it is also known to cast the steel teeth and, therefore, “steel-tooth” is a better reference. A steel-tooth roller cone drill bit uses roller cones, with each cone having an integral body of hardened steel with teeth formed on the periphery. There are numerous styles of steel-tooth roller cone drill bits designed for formations of varying hardness in which the shape, number and protrusion of the teeth will vary, along with roller cone angles on the drill bit.
The cost efficiency of a drill bit is determined by the drilling life of the drill bit and the rate at which the drill bit penetrates the earth. Under normal drilling conditions, the teeth of the steel-tooth roller cone drill bits are subject to continuous impact and wear because of their engagement with the rock being drilled. As the teeth are worn away, the penetration rate of the drill bit decreases causing the cost of drilling to increase.
To increase the cost efficiency of a steel-tooth roller cone drill bit or a hybrid drill bit having steel-tooth roller cones, it is necessary to increase the wear resistance of the steel teeth. To accomplish this, it is known to deposit one or more layers of a wear-resistant material or “hardfacing” to the exposed surfaces of the steel teeth. Fusion hardfacing refers to a group of techniques that apply (fuse) a wear-resistant alloy (hardfacing) to a substrate metal. Common hardfacing techniques include arc welding and gas torch welding, among other welding processes.
Conventional welding techniques used to apply hardfacing to steel-tooth roller cone drill bits include oxyacetylene welding (OAW) and atomic hydrogen welding (AHW). Currently manual welding is typically used in the commercial production of roller cone rock bits. Roller cones are mounted on a positioning table while a welding torch and welding rod are used to manually apply hardfacing to portions of each tooth of each roller cone by a welder moving from tooth to tooth and cone to cone from various positions.
Conventional hardfacing materials used to add wear resistance to the steel teeth of a roller cone drill bit include tungsten carbide particles in a metal matrix, typically cobalt or a mixture of cobalt and other similar metals. Many different compositions of hardfacing material have been employed in the rock bit field to achieve wear-resistance, durability and ease of application. Typically, these hardfacing materials are supplied in the form of a welding rod, but can be found in powder form for use with other types of torches.
The physical indicators for the quality of a hardfacing application include uniformity, thickness, coverage, porosity, and other metallurgical properties. Typically, the skill of the individual applying hardfacing determines the quality of the hardfacing. The quality of hardfacing varies between drill bits as well as between the roller cones of a drill bit, and individual teeth of a roller cone. Limited availability of qualified welders has aggravated the problem because the application of hardfacing is extremely tedious, repetitive, skill-dependent, time-consuming, and expensive. The application of hardfacing to roller cones is considered the most tedious and skill-dependent operation in the manufacture of a steel-toothed roller cone drill bit. The consistency of the application of hardfacing to a drill bit by a skilled welder varies over different portions of the drill bit.
To summarize, manually applying hardfacing to a roller cone involves the continuous angular manipulation of a torch over the roller cone, the roller cone held substantially stationary, but being rotated on a positioning table. After hardfacing is manually applied to a surface of each tooth of the roller cone using a torch and welding rod containing the hardfacing material, the positioning table and cutter are indexed to a new angle and position to permit application of hardfacing to a surface of the next tooth of the roller cone until all the cutters have been rotated 360 degrees. At that time, the angle of the table and cutter is adjusted for the application of hardfacing to another tooth surface or row of teeth of the roller cone.
When attempts to utilize robotics to automate the welding process were made, the same configuration was used having a robotic arm to replace the human operator's arm and its varied movements, while leaving the roller cone on a positioning table. The positioning table is capable of automatic indexing between teeth and rows of teeth of a roller cone.
This configuration and procedure would be expected to provide the recognized benefits of manual hardfacing for a number of reasons. First, manual and automatic torches are much lighter and easier to continuously manipulate than the heavy steel cutters with teeth protruding in all directions. Second, the roller cone must be electrically grounded, and this can be done easily through the stationary positioning table. Third, gravity maintains the heavy roller cone in position on the positioning table. Fourth, highly angled (relative to vertical) manipulation of the torch allows access to confined spaces between teeth of the roller cone and is suited to the highly articulated movement of a robotic arm.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,392,190 provides a description of the use of a robotic arm in hardfacing of roller cones, in which the torch is held by a robotic arm and the roller cones are moved on a positioning table. A manual welder is replaced with a robotic arm for holding the torch. The robotic arm and a positioning table are combined to have more than five movable axes in the system for applying hardfacing. However, U.S. Pat. No. 6,392,190 does not describe details of solutions to the numerous obstacles in automating the hardfacing of roller cones using robotic arms and positioners.
One factor limiting use of robotic hardfacing has been the unsatisfactory appearance of the final product when applied using robotically held torches over stationary cutters. Another factor limiting use of robotic hardfacing to rolling cutters is the commercial unavailability of a material that directly compares to conventional Oxygen Acetylene Welding (OAW) welding rod materials that can be applied with commercially available Plasma Transferred Arc (PTA) torches.
Another factor limiting use of robotic hardfacing is the inability to properly identify and locate individual roller cone designs within a robotic hardfacing system. The roller cones of each size of drill bit and style of drill bit are substantially different, and initiating the wrong program could cause a collision of the torch and part, resulting in catastrophic failure and loss. Another factor limiting use of robotic hardfacing is the inability to correct the critical positioning between the torch and roller cone in response to manufacturing variations of the cutter, wear of the torch, and buildup of hardfacing.
Still another factor limiting use of robotic hardfacing has been the inability to properly access many of the areas on the complex surface of a roller cone that require hardfacing with commercially available Plasma Transferred Arc (PTA) torches large enough to permit application of the required material. A small form factor (profile) is required to access the roots of the teeth of a roller cone that are close together. However, most conventional PTA torches require large powder ports to accommodate the flow of the medium-to-large mesh powder required for good wear resistance. Torches with smaller nozzles have smaller powder ports that prohibit proper flow of the desired powders.
Another factor limiting use of robotic hardfacing is the complexity of programming a control system to coordinate the critical paths and application sequences needed to apply the hardfacing. For example, undisclosed in the prior art, the known torch operating parameters, materials, application sequences, and procedures used for decades in manual hardfacing operations have proven to be mostly irrelevant to robotic hardfacing of roller cones. A related factor limiting use of robotic hardfacing is the cost and limitation of resources. A significant investment and commitment of machine time are required to create tests., evaluate results, modify equipment, and incrementally adjust the several operating parameters, and then integrate the variations into production part programs. These and several other obstacles have, until now, limited or prevented any commercial practice of automated hardfacing of roller cones.
Therefore, there is a need to develop a system and method for applying hardfacing to roller cones consistent with the highest material and application quality standards obtainable by manual welding. There is also a need to develop a system that identifies parts, selects the proper program, and provides programmed correction in response to manufacturing variations of the roller cones, wear of the torch, and buildup of hardfacing. There is also a need to develop a PTA torch design capable of accessing more of the areas on a roller cone's cutter that require hardfacing. There is also a need to develop a hardfacing material, the performance of which will compare favorably to conventional Oxygen Acetylene Welding (OAW) materials and flow properly through the PTA torch design.
A system and method for the application of hardfacing to surfaces of drill bits.
The objects and features of the invention will become more readily understood from the following detailed description and appended claims when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like elements.
The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include exemplary embodiments of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms. It is to be understood that in some instances various aspects of the invention may be shown as exaggerated or enlarged to facilitate an understanding of the invention.
The system and method of the present invention have an opposite configuration and method of operation to that of manual hardfacing and prior automated hardfacing systems. In the present system and method a robotic system is used, having a plasma transfer arc torch secured in a substantially vertical position to a torch positioner in a downward orientation. The torch positioner is program-controllable in a vertical plane. Shielding, plasma, and transport gases are supplied to the torch through electrically controllable flow valves. Rather than use a torch positioner, a robotic arm can be used having a transfer arc torch secured thereto in a substantially vertical position in a downward orientation. For handling a roller cone, a robot having program controllable movement of an articulated arm is used. A chuck adapter is attached to the arm of the robot. A three-jaw chuck is attached to the chuck adapter. The chuck is capable of securely holding a roller cone in an inverted position.
A first position sensor is positioned for determining the proximity of the torch to a surface of the roller cone. A second position sensor may be positioned for determining the location, orientation, or identification of the roller cone. A programmable control system is electrically connected to the torch, the torch positioner or robotic arm having the torch mounted thereon, the robot, shielding, plasma, and transport gas flow valves, and the position sensors programmed for operation of each. The robot is programmed to position a surface of a cutter below the torch prior to the application of welding material to the roller cone.
In this configuration, the torch is oscillated in a horizontal path. The roller cone is manipulated such that a programmed target path for each tooth surface is followed beneath the path midpoint (or equivalent indicator) of the oscillating torch. The movement of the roller cone beneath the torch generates a waveform pattern of hardfacing. In a preferred embodiment, the target path is a type of waveform path as well. Imposing the torch waveform onto the target path waveform generates a high-quality and efficient hardfaced coating on the roller cone. In another preferred embodiment, the roller cone is oscillated in relation to the torch as it follows the target path. This embodiment provides the ability to generate unique and desirable hardfacing patterns on the surface of the cutter, while maintaining symmetry and coverage.
An advantage of the system and method of the present invention is that it automates the hardfacing application of roller cones or any other desired portion of a drill bit, which increases the consistency and quality of the applied hardfacing, and thus the reliability, performance, and cost efficiency of the roller cone and the drill bit. Another advantage of the system and method of present invention is that it reduces manufacturing cost and reliance on skilled laborers. Another advantage of the system and method of the present invention is that by decreasing production time, product inventory levels can be reduced. Another advantage of the system and method of the present invention is that it facilitates the automated collection of welding data, from which further process controls and process design improvements can be made.
Another advantage of the system and method of the present invention is that utilization of the robotic arm to manipulate the roller cone and a robotic arm having the torch mounted thereon improves the opportunity to integrate sensors for providing feedback. Another advantage of the system and method of the present invention is that utilization of the robotic arm to manipulate the roller cone provides the necessary surface-to-torch angularity for access, without disrupting the flow of the powder due to changes in the angle of the torch.
As referred to hereinabove, the “system and method of the present invention” refers to one or more embodiments of the invention, which may or may not be claimed, and such references are not intended to limit the language of the claims, or to be used to construe the claims. The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
During drilling, drilling fluid is discharged through nozzle assemblies 630 located in sleeve ports 628 in fluid communication with the face 614 of bit body 611 for cooling the PCD tables 618 of cutting elements 616 and removing formation cuttings from the face 614 of drill bit 610 into passages 615 and junk slots 617.
In
As previously mentioned, the cone 522 may comprise a sintered particle-matrix composite material that comprises a plurality of hard particles dispersed through a matrix material. In some embodiments, the cone 522 may be predominantly comprised of the particle-matrix composite material.
After the cutter assembly 514′ has been sintered to a desired final density, various features of the cutter assembly 514′ may be machined and polished, as necessary or desired. For example, bearing surfaces on the bearing structures 568 may be polished. Polishing the bearing surfaces of the bearing structures 568 may provide a relatively smoother surface finish and may reduce friction at the interface between the bearing structures 568 and the bearing pin 528 (
The cutting inserts 524, lands 523, and bearing structures 568 may be formed from particle-matrix composite materials. The material composition of each of the cutting inserts 524, lands 523, bearing structures 568, and cone 522 may be separately and individually selected to exhibit physical and/or chemical properties tailored to the operating conditions to be experienced by each of the respective components. By way of example, the composition of the cutting inserts 524 and the lands 523 may be selected so as to form cutting inserts 524 comprising a particle-matrix composite material that exhibits a different hardness, wear resistance, and/or toughness different from that exhibited by the particle-matrix composite material of the cone 522.
The cutting inserts 524 and lands 523 may be formed from a variety of particle-matrix composite material compositions. The particular composition of any particular cutting insert 524 and lands 523 may be selected to exhibit one or more physical and/or chemical properties tailored for a particular earth formation to be drilled using the drill bit 510 (
By way of example, in some embodiments of the present invention, the cutting inserts 524 and the lands 523 may comprise a particle-matrix composite material that includes a plurality of hard particles that are harder than a plurality of hard particles of the particle-matrix composite material of the cone 522. The concentration of the hard particles in the particle-matrix composite material of the cutting inserts 524 and the lands 523 may be greater than a concentration of hard particles in a particle-matrix composite material of the cone 522.
To prevent early wear and failure of drill bit 1, (see
Robot 100 has a handling capacity of at least 125 kg, and articulated arm 104 has a wrist torque rating of at least 750 nm. Examples of industrial robots that are commercially available include models IRB 6600/IRB 6500, which are available from ABB Robotics, Inc., 125 Brown Road, Auburn Hills, Mich., USA, 48326-1507.
An adapter 110 is attached to distal end 106. Adapter 110 has a ground connector 112 (see
A heat sink, or thermal barrier, is provided between roller cone 10 and adapter 110 to prevent heat from causing premature failure of the rotating axis at distal end 106 of articulated arm 104. The thermal barrier is an insulating spacer (not shown) located between roller cone 10 and distal end 106 of robot 100. Alternatively, roller cone 10 may be gripped in a manner that provides an air space between roller cone 10 and distal end 106 of robot 100 to dissipate heat.
A robot controller 130 is electrically connected to robot 100 for programmed manipulation of robot 100, including movement of articulated arm 104. An operator pendant 137 may be provided as electrically connected to robot controller 130 for convenient operator interface with robot 100. A sensor controller 140 is electrically connected to robot controller 130. Sensor controller 140 may also be electrically connected to a programmable logic controller 150.
A plurality of sensors 142 are electrically connected to sensor controller 140. Sensors 142 include a camera 144 and/or a contact probe 146. Alternatively, sensors 142 include a suitable laser proximity indicator 148 (illustrated as an arrow). Other types of sensors 142 may also be used. Sensors 142 provide interactive information to robot controller 130, such as the distance between a tooth 20 on roller cone 10 and torch 300.
A programmable logic controller 150 is electrically connected to robot controller 130. Programmable logic controller (PLC) 150 provides instructions to auxiliary controllable devices that operate in coordinated and programmed sequence with robot 100.
A powder dosage system 160 is provided for dispensing hardfacing powder to the system. A driver 162 is electrically connected to PLC 150 for dispensing the powder at a predetermined, desired rate.
A pilot arc power source 170 and a main arc power source 172 are electrically connected to PLC 150. A cooling unit 174 is electrically connected to PLC 150. In a preferred embodiment, a data-recording device 195 is electrically connected to PLC 150.
A gas dispensing system 180 is provided. A transport gas source 182 supplies transport gas through a flow controller 184 to carry or transport hardfacing welding powder to torch 300. Flow controller 184 is electrically connected to PLC 150, which controls the operation of flow controller 184 and the flow and flow rate of the transport gas. A plasma gas source 186 supplies gas for plasma formation through a flow controller 188. Flow controller 188 is electrically connected to PLC 150, which controls the operation of flow controller 188 and the flow and flow rate of the plasma gas. Similarly, a shielding gas source 190 supplies shielding gas through a flow controller 192. Flow controller 192 is electrically connected to PLC 150, which controls the operation of flow controller 192 and the flow and flow rate of the shielding gas. It is known to utilize a single gas source for more than one purpose, e.g., plasma, shielding, and transport. Thus, different, multiple flow controllers connected in a series alignment can control the flow and flow rate of gas from a single gas source.
The torch 300 comprises a plasma transferred arc (PTA) torch, that receives hardfacing welding powder from powder dosage system 160, and plasma, transport, and shielding gases from their respective supplies and controllers in gas dispensing system 180. Torch 300 is secured to a positioner or positioning table 200, which grips and manipulates torch 300. In a preferred embodiment, positioner 200 is capable of programmed positioning of torch 300 in a substantially vertical plane. A positioner 200 has a vertical drive 202 and a horizontal drive 204. Drives 202 and 204 may be toothed belts, ball screws, a toothed rack, pneumatic, or other means. If desired, an industrial robot 100 having six independently controllable axes of movement between base 102 and distal end 106 of arm 104 as described herein may be used as the positioner 200 having the torch 300 mounted thereon.
Adapter 110 is aligned by indicator with articulated arm 104. Adapter 110 is aligned to run substantially true with a programmable axis of movement of robot 100. A chuck 120 is attached to adapter 110 and indicator aligned to within 0.005 inch of true center rotation. Roller cone 10 is held by chuck 120 and also centered by indicator alignment. Roller cone 10 has grooves that permit location and calibration of the end of torch 300. Electrode 304 (see
As illustrated in
As roller cones 10 are manipulated vertically, horizontally, inverted, and rotated beneath torch 300, highly secure attachment of roller cone 10 to robot 100 is required for safety and accuracy of the hardfacing operation. Precision alignment of roller cones 10 in relation to chuck 120 is also necessary to produce a quality hardfacing and to avoid material waste.
Illustrated in
Drive 204 oscillates torch 300 along the horizontal y-axis in response to PLC 150 for programmed application of a wide-path bead of hardfacing 38 on the surface of teeth 20 of roller cone 10 (see
Gas dispensing system 180 is connected by piping or tubing to torch 300 for the delivery of transport gas, plasma gas and shielding gas. Hardfacing powder is delivered to torch 300 within the stream of flowing transport gas which receives the hardfacing powder from powder dosage system 160 (see
Electrode 304 is electrically insulated from nozzle 302. A pilot arc circuit 330 is electrically connected to pilot arc power source 170 (
A gas cup 320 surrounds nozzle 302. Nozzle 302 is electrically insulated from gas cup 320. A cup annulus 322 is formed between gas cup 320 and nozzle 302. Cup annulus 322 is connected to shielding gas source 190 (see
A small, non-transferred pilot arc burns between non-melting (non-consumable) tungsten electrode 304 (cathode) and nozzle 302 (anode). A transferred arc burns between electrode 304 (cathode) and roller cone 10 (anode). Electrode 304 is the negative pole and roller cone 10 is the positive pole. Pilot arc circuit 330 is ignited to reduce the resistance to an arc jumping between roller cone 10 and electrode 304 when voltage is applied to main arc circuit 332. A ceramic insulator separates circuits 330 and 332.
Plasma Transferred Arc (PTA) welding is similar to Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welding. Torch 300 is supplied with plasma gas, shielding gas, and transport gas, as well as hardfacing powder. Plasma gas from plasma gas source 186 (see
Shielding gas from shielding gas source 190 (see
Transport gas source 182 is connected to powder dosage system 160, as shown in
Gas cup 320 is modified from commercially available gas cups for use with torch 300 in that gas cup 320 extends beyond nozzle 302 by no more than approximately 0.020 inch. As such, gas cup 320 has an overall length of approximately 4.375 inches. As seen in the embodiment, transport gas and powder are delivered through a transport gas port 324 in nozzle 302. An insulating material is attached to the exterior of gas cup 320 of the torch 300 for helping to prevent short-circuiting and damage to torch 300.
The shielding of gas cup 320 described above is specially designed to improve shield gas coverage of the melt puddle for reducing the porosity thereof. This permits changing the orientation of gas cup 320 to nozzle (anode) 302 and reduction of shielding gas flow velocity. This combination significantly reduces porosity that results from attempts to use presently available commercial equipment to robotically apply hardfacing 38 to steel-tooth roller cones 10.
Some of the problems encountered in the development of robotic hardfacing included interference between the torch and teeth on the roller cone, short circuiting the torch, inconsistent powder flow, unsustainable plasma column, unstable puddle, heat buildup when using conventional welding parameters, overheated weld deposits, inconsistent weld deposits, miss-shaping of teeth, and other issues. As a result, extensive experimentation was required to reduce the present invention to practice.
As described herein, the system and method of the present invention begins with inverting what has been the conventional practice of roller cones. That is, the practice of maintaining roller cone 10 generally stationary and moving torch 300 all over it at various angles as necessary. Fundamental to the system and method of the present invention, torch 300 is preferably held substantially vertical, although it may be held at any angle or attitude desired through the use of a positioner 200 or robotic arm 100, while roller cone 10 is held by chuck 120 of robotic arm 104 and manipulated beneath torch 300. If torch 300 is robotically manipulated by positioner 200 or robotic arm 104 in varying and high angular positions relative to vertical, hardfacing powder in torch 300 will flow unevenly and cause torch 300 to become plugged. In addition to plugging torch 300, even flow of hardfacing powder is critical to obtaining a consistent quality bead of hardfacing material on roller cone 10. Thus, deviation from a substantially vertical orientation is avoided. Although, if plugging of torch 300 is not a problem with the particular hardfacing being used, the torch 300 may be oriented at any desired position.
As the terms are used in this specification and claims, the words “generally” and “substantially” are used as descriptors of approximation, and not words of magnitude. Thus, they are to be interpreted as meaning “largely but not necessarily entirely.”
Accordingly, a roller cone 10 is secured to distal end 106 of robot arm 104 by chuck 120 and adapter 110. Roller cone 10 is grounded by ground cable 114 which is attached to adapter 110 at ground connector 112. Providing an electrical ground source near distal end 106 of of robot arm 104 of robot 100 is necessary, since using robot 100 in the role-reversed manner of the present invention (holding the anode work piece) would otherwise result in destruction of the robot 100 by arc welding the rotating components of the movable axes together.
Robot arm 104 moves in response to program control from robot controller 130 and/or PLC 150. As stated, torch 300 is mounted to positioner 200 having two controllable axes in a substantially vertical plane. As previously mentioned, a physical indicator, such as a notch or groove, may be formed on roller cone 10 to be engaged by torch 300 to ensure proper initial orientation between torch 300, robot arm 104, and roller cone 10. Additionally, at least one position indicator is electrically connected to PLC 150 for determining location and orientation of roller cone 10 to be hardfaced relative to robot 100.
After initial orientation and positioning, transfer, plasma and shielding gases are supplied to torch 300 by their respective sources 182, 186, 190, through their respective controllers 184, 188, 192.
Torch 300 is ignited by provision of current from pilot arc power source 170 and main arc power source 172. Igniting pilot arc circuit 330 reduces the resistance to an arc jumping between roller cone 10 and electrode 304 when voltage is applied to main arc circuit 332.
Flow of hardfacing powder is provided by powder dosage system 160 dispensing controlled amounts of hardfacing powder into a conduit of flowing transport gas from transport gas source 182, having a flow rate controlled by flow controller 184. Then relative movement, primarily of roller cone 10 relative to torch 300, as described above and below is obtained by movement of robot arm 104 and positioner 200, permitting automated application of hardfacing 38 to the various selected surfaces of roller cone 10 in response to programming from robot controller 130 and PLC 150.
An imaging sensor 142 may be provided for identifying specific roller cones 10 and/or parts of roller cones 10 to be hardfaced. A laser sensor 142 (
Robot controller 130 is primarily responsible for control of robot arm 104, while PLC 150 and data recording device 195 provide sensor 142 data collection and processing, data analysis and process adjustment, adjustments in robot 100 movement, torch 300 oscillation, and torch 300 operation, including power, gas flow rates and material feed rates.
As can be seen in
The above-described system and method of the present invention has resolved these issues and enabled development of the method of applying hardfacing of the present invention. The present invention includes a hardfacing pattern created by superimposing a first waveform path onto a second waveform path.
As illustrated, target path 50 traverses one surface of tooth 20. By way of example, outer end surface 28 is shown, but applies to any and all surfaces of tooth 20. Target path 50 has numerous features. Target path 50 may begin with a strike path 52 located near crest 26. The various surfaces of teeth 20 are preferably welded from nearest crest 26 toward base 32, when possible, to control heat buildup.
Thereafter, target path 50 traverses the surface of tooth 20 in parallel paths while progressing in the direction of base 32. Target path 50 is comprised of traversing paths 54, which cross centerline 34, are alternating in direction, and generally parallel to crest 26.
Step paths 56 connect traversing paths 54 to form a continuous target path 50. Step paths 56 are not reversing, but progressing in the direction of base 32. Step paths 56 are preferably generally parallel to the sides of the surface being hardfaced. As such, step paths 56 are disposed at an angle of approximately θ/2 to centerline 34. Taken together, traversing paths 54 and step paths 56 form target path 50 as a stationary, generally trapezoidal waveform about centerline 34, having an increasing amplitude in the direction of base 32.
The amperage of torch 300 is applied in proportion to the length of traversing path 54. This permits generation of a good quality bead definition in hardfacing 38. This is obtained by starting at the lowest amperage on traversing path 54 nearest to crest 26 of tooth 20, and increasing the amperage in proportion to the length of traversing path 54 where hardfacing 38 is being applied.
Alternatively, amperage and powder flow are increased as hardfacing 38 is applied to crest 26. This results in increased height of the automatically welded crests 26 to their total design height. The programmed traversing paths 54 for flanks 22 and 24, inner surface 30 and outer surface 28 (see
The program sequence welds the surface of a datum tooth, then offsets around the roller cone axis the amount needed to align with the next tooth surface. Also, teeth are welded from the tip to the root to enhance heat transfer from the tooth and prevent heat buildup. Welding is alternated between rows of teeth on the roller cone to reduce heat buildup.
As used throughout herein, the terms “waveform,” “trapezoidal waveform” and “triangular waveform” are not intended to be construed or interpreted by any resource other than the drawings and description provided herein. More specifically, they are used only as descriptors of the general path shapes to which they have been applied herein.
As seen in
The torch path 60 has a velocity of propagation Vt of between 1.2 mm and 2.5 mm per second at the intersection of traversing path 54 and OM of torch 300. Roller cone 10 is positioned and moved by instructions from robot controller 130 provided to robot 100. Robot 100 moves roller cone 10 to align target path 50 directly beneath the OM. Roller cone 10 is moved such that the OM progresses along target path 50 at a linear velocity (target path speed) of between 1 mm and 2.5 mm per second.
As illustrated, a momentary dwell period 68 is programmed to elapse between peaks of oscillation of torch 300, wherein dwell period 68 helps prevent generally triangular waveform of torch path 60 from being a true triangular waveform. Preferably, dwell period 68 is between about 0.1 to 0.4 seconds.
Referring to
As roller cone 10 moves along traversing path 54, roller cone 10 is gradually articulated by robot 100 until axis of oscillation AO (see
Secondary oscillation of roller cone 10 continues until subsequent step path 56 is parallel to axis of oscillation AO, when oscillation midpoint OM arrives at subsequent step path 56. At that point, a maximum articulation of −θ/2 has been imparted to roller cone 10. Oscillation is again dwelled at point 90 until oscillation midpoint OM arrives at subsequent traversing path 54.
Robot 100 rotates roller cone 10 a maximum of angle θ/2 at the intersection of traversing path 54 and step path 56, such that step path 56 and the approaching edge of tooth 20 are oriented generally parallel to axis of oscillation AO of torch 300. The waveform of torch path 60 is thus substantially modified as torch 300 approaches each step path 56. The application result is a very efficient and tough “shingle” pattern 39 of hardfacing 38 near tooth 20 centerline 34.
Optionally, oscillation of roller cone 10 may be dwelled when oscillation midpoint OM is near centerline 34 of tooth 20 to obtain a more uniform bead deposition across the width of tooth 20. In the preferred embodiment, step paths 56 are slightly offset from the edge of tooth 20 by a distance d.
The path speed of step path 56 may be higher than the path speed of traversing path 54, such that the amount of hardfacing deposited is controlled to provide the desired edge protection for tooth 20. It is preferred to have the length of step path 56 is greater than height Λ, and less than 2Λ. Preferably, step path 56 is approximately 5 mm. Thus, hardfacing deposited on two adjacent traversing paths 54 will overlap. Preferably, the length of overlap is about 3 mm. Generating this overlap creates a smooth surface with no crack-like defects.
Roller cone 10 may be preheated to prevent heat induced stress. When necessary, portions of the welds can be interrupted during processing to minimize and control heat buildup. Preferably, crests 26 are formed in three interrupted passes, in which the interruption provides cooling and shape stabilization of the applied material from the previous pass.
Referring to
As roller cone 10 moves along traversing path 54, it is not again articulated by robot 100 until oscillation midpoint OM of torch 300 nears or reaches the subsequent step path 56. This occurs schematically at point 96 on
A traversing row 54A will comprise the centerline of a series of parallel columns of hardfacing 38 inclined at an angle to centerline 34 of tooth 20. As illustrated, the angle is approximately θ/2. Additionally, traversing row 54A will have an adjacent traversing row 54B comprising the centerline of a series of parallel columns of hardfacing 38, inclined at an angle to centerline 34 of tooth 20, where the angle is approximately −(θ/2). Still, the hardfacing 38 of traversing row 54A and the hardfacing of traversing row 54B will overlap. The application result is a very efficient and tough “herringbone” pattern 41 of hardfacing 38 near tooth 20 centerline 34.
As an alternative, a scooped tooth 20 configuration is obtained by welding crest 26 in two passes. The first pass adds height. When the second pass is made without pausing, hardfacing 38 applied to crest 26 adds width and laps over to the desired side.
It will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Having thus described the present invention by reference to certain of its preferred embodiments, it is noted that the embodiments disclosed are illustrative rather than limiting in nature and that a wide range of variations, modifications, changes, and substitutions are contemplated in the foregoing disclosure and, in some instances, some features of the present invention may be employed without a corresponding use of the other features. Many such variations and modifications may be considered desirable by those skilled in the art based upon a review of the foregoing description of preferred embodiments. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
930759 | Hughes | Aug 1909 | A |
1874066 | Scott et al. | Aug 1932 | A |
1879127 | Schlumpf | Sep 1932 | A |
1932487 | Scott | Oct 1933 | A |
2030722 | Scott | Feb 1936 | A |
2198849 | Waxler | Apr 1940 | A |
2297157 | McClinton | Sep 1942 | A |
2719026 | Boice | Sep 1955 | A |
3010708 | Lundquist | Nov 1961 | A |
3055443 | Edwards | Sep 1962 | A |
3174564 | Morlan | Mar 1965 | A |
3269469 | Kelly, Jr. | Aug 1966 | A |
3424258 | Nakyama | Jan 1969 | A |
3777115 | Kazlauskas | Dec 1973 | A |
3865525 | Dunn | Feb 1975 | A |
RE28625 | Cunningham | Nov 1975 | E |
4006788 | Garner | Feb 1977 | A |
4140189 | Garner | Feb 1979 | A |
4182394 | Cason, Jr. | Jan 1980 | A |
4190126 | Kabashima | Feb 1980 | A |
4228339 | Scales et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4270812 | Thomas | Jun 1981 | A |
4285409 | Allen | Aug 1981 | A |
4293048 | Kloesel | Oct 1981 | A |
4309587 | Nakano et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4320808 | Garrett | Mar 1982 | A |
4343371 | Baker et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4358471 | Derkacs et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4359112 | Garner et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4369849 | Parrish | Jan 1983 | A |
4373128 | Asai et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4396077 | Radtke | Aug 1983 | A |
4410284 | Herrick | Oct 1983 | A |
4411935 | Anderson | Oct 1983 | A |
4444281 | Schumacher et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4527637 | Bodine et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4546902 | Anderson | Oct 1985 | A |
4567343 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4572306 | Dorosz | Feb 1986 | A |
4664705 | Horton et al. | May 1987 | A |
4689463 | Shubert | Aug 1987 | A |
4690228 | Voelz et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4726718 | Meskin et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727942 | Galle et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4738322 | Hall et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4763736 | Varel, Sr. | Aug 1988 | A |
4765205 | Higdon | Aug 1988 | A |
4814234 | Bird | Mar 1989 | A |
4835357 | Schalk et al. | May 1989 | A |
4836307 | Keshavan et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4864094 | Saltzman et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866241 | Doherty et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4874047 | Hixon | Oct 1989 | A |
4875532 | Langford | Oct 1989 | A |
4892159 | Holster | Jan 1990 | A |
4923511 | Krizan et al. | May 1990 | A |
4932484 | Warren et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936398 | Auty | Jun 1990 | A |
4943488 | Sung et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953641 | Pessier et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4984643 | Isbell et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991671 | Pearce et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5010225 | Carlin | Apr 1991 | A |
5016718 | Tandberg | May 1991 | A |
5027912 | Juergens | Jul 1991 | A |
5028177 | Meskin et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5030276 | Sung et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038640 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049164 | Horton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5116568 | Sung et al. | May 1992 | A |
5145017 | Holster et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152194 | Keshavan et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5176212 | Tandberg | Jan 1993 | A |
5224560 | Fernandez | Jul 1993 | A |
5226977 | Kitaguchi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233150 | Schneebeli et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5238074 | Tibbitts et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5254923 | Kanitani | Oct 1993 | A |
5287936 | Grimes et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5289889 | Gearhart et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293026 | Dennis et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5314722 | Kobayashi | May 1994 | A |
5337843 | Torgrimsen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5346026 | Pessier et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5429200 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439068 | Huffstutler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452771 | Blackman et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5467836 | Grimes et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5513715 | Dysart | May 1996 | A |
5518077 | Blackman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524510 | Davies et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535838 | Keshavan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547033 | Campos, Jr. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553681 | Huffstutler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558170 | Thigpen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5570750 | Williams | Nov 1996 | A |
5593231 | Ippolito | Jan 1997 | A |
5606895 | Huffstutler | Mar 1997 | A |
5624002 | Huffstutler | Apr 1997 | A |
5624588 | Terawaki et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5641029 | Beaton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644956 | Blackman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645896 | Mills | Jul 1997 | A |
5655612 | Grimes et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
D384084 | Huffstutler et al. | Sep 1997 | S |
5695018 | Pessier et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695019 | Shamburger, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710405 | Solomon et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5740872 | Smith | Apr 1998 | A |
5755297 | Young et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755298 | Langford, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755299 | Langford, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5866872 | Lu et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868502 | Cariveau et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873422 | Hansen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5893204 | Symonds | Apr 1999 | A |
5900272 | Goodman | May 1999 | A |
5921330 | Sue et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935350 | Raghu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941322 | Stephenson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942289 | Jackson | Aug 1999 | A |
5944125 | Byrd | Aug 1999 | A |
5967246 | Caraway et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979576 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988303 | Arfele | Nov 1999 | A |
5992542 | Rives | Nov 1999 | A |
5996713 | Pessier et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6046431 | Beattie | Apr 2000 | A |
6084196 | Flowers et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092613 | Caraway et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095265 | Alsup | Aug 2000 | A |
6109375 | Tso | Aug 2000 | A |
6124564 | Sue et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6138779 | Boyce | Oct 2000 | A |
6173797 | Dystra et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220374 | Crawford | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260635 | Crawford | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279671 | Panigrahi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283233 | Lamine et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296069 | Lamine et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
RE37450 | Deken et al. | Nov 2001 | E |
6360831 | Akesson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375895 | Daemen | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376801 | Farrell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380512 | Emer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386302 | Beaton | May 2002 | B1 |
6392190 | Sue et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401844 | Doster et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408958 | Isbell et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415687 | Saxman | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6439326 | Huang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446739 | Richman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450270 | Saxton | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6474424 | Saxman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510906 | Richert et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510909 | Portwood et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6527066 | Rives | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533051 | Singh et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544308 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562462 | Griffin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568490 | Tso et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6585064 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589640 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592985 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601475 | Davies et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6601661 | Baker et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6601662 | Matthias et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615936 | Mourik et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6649682 | Breton et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6684967 | Mensa-Wilmot et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698098 | Griffo et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6729418 | Slaughter, Jr. et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6739214 | Griffin et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6742607 | Beaton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749033 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766870 | Overstreet | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6772849 | Oldham et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797326 | Griffin et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6843333 | Richert et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6861098 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6861137 | Griffin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6861612 | Bolton et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878447 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883623 | McCormick et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6972390 | Hu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986395 | Chen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988569 | Lockstedt et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034262 | Fischer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041936 | Oberzaucher et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7096978 | Dykstra et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111694 | Beaton | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7137460 | Slaughter, Jr. et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152702 | Bhome et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7210377 | Griffo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7234550 | Azar et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7262240 | Breton et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7350568 | Mandal et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7350601 | Belnap et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360612 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7361411 | Daemen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377341 | Middlemiss et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387177 | Zahradnik et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392862 | Zahradnik et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7398837 | Hall et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416036 | Forstner et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7435478 | Keshavan | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462003 | Middlemiss | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473287 | Belnap et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7493973 | Keshavan et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517589 | Eyre | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533740 | Zhang et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7568534 | Griffin et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020017402 | Bird | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040108145 | Siracki | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040173384 | Yong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050077090 | Viswanadham et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087370 | Ledgerwood | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050178587 | Witman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183892 | Oldham et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050263328 | Middlemiss | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273301 | Huang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060032674 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060032677 | Azar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060162969 | Belnap et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177689 | Muir et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196699 | Estes et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254830 | Radtke | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060266558 | Middlemiss et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060266559 | Keshavan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278442 | Kristensen | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283640 | Estes et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000698 | Viswanadham | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029114 | Middlemiss | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070062736 | Cariveau et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079994 | Middlemiss | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070187155 | Middlemiss | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070243794 | Mundt | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080066970 | Zahradnik et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080145686 | Mirchandani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080264695 | Zahradnik et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080296068 | Zahradnik et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090039062 | Cretegny et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090114454 | Belnap et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090126998 | Zahradnik et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090159338 | Buske | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159341 | Pessier et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090166093 | Pessier et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178855 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183925 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100065337 | Luce et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106285 | Massey | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100159157 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100181292 | Stauffer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2458158 | Feb 2004 | CA |
0049899 | Apr 1982 | EP |
0194050 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0225101 | Jun 1987 | EP |
0157278 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0351039 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0496181 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0496181 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0573135 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0391683 | Jan 1996 | EP |
2089187 | Aug 2009 | EP |
2183694 | Jun 1987 | GB |
2276886 | Oct 1994 | GB |
2293615 | Apr 1996 | GB |
2295157 | May 1996 | GB |
2311085 | Sep 1997 | GB |
05131289 | May 1993 | JP |
08141744 | Jun 1996 | JP |
2005524533 | Aug 2005 | JP |
8502223 | May 1985 | WO |
9706339 | Feb 1997 | WO |
2008124572 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Berge, James M., “Automating the Welding Process, Successful Implementation of Automated Welding Systems,” Copyright 1994 by Industrial Press Inc., New York, NY. |
Cary, Howard B., “Arc Welding Automation,” Copyright 1995 by Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY , Chapters 1-20 and Appendixes. (submitted in six parts). |
Buske et al., Performance Pardigm Shift: Drilling Vertical and directional Sections Through Abrasive Formations with Roller Cone Bits, Society of Petroleum Engineers—ISPE 114975, CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference, Canada, Jun. 16-19, 2008. |
Ersoy et al., Wear Characteristics of PDC Pin and Hybrid Core Bits in Rock Drilling, Wear 188, Elsevier Science S. A., Mar. 1995, pp. 150-165. |
Gatto et al., Plasma Transferred Arc Deposition of Powdered High Performances Alloys: Process Parameters Optimization as a Function of Alloy and Geometrical Configuration, Surface & Coatings Technology, vol. 187 (2-3), pp. 265-271 (2004). |
George et al., Significant Cost Savings Achieved Through the Use of PDC Bits in Compressed Air/Foam Applications, Society of Petroleum Engineers—SPE 116118, 2008 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, Sep. 21-24, 2008. |
Mills Machine Company, Inc., Rotary Hole Openers—Section 8, http://www.millsmachine.com/pages/home—page/mills—catalog/cat—holeopen/cat—holeopen.pdf, retrieved Apr. 27, 2009. |
Pessier et al., Hybrid Bits Offer Distinct Advantages in Selected Roller Cone and PDC Bit Applications, IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Feb. 2-4, 2010, New Orleans. |
Sheppard et al., Rock Drilling—Hybrid Bit Success for Syndax3 Pins, Industrial Diamond Review, Jun. 1993, pp. 309-311. |
Smith Services, Hole Opener—Model 6980 Hole Opener, http://www.siismithservices.com/b—products/product—page.asp?ID=589, retrieved May 7, 2008. |
Tomlinson et al., Rock Drilling—Syndax3 Pins—New Concepts in PCD Drilling, Industrial Diamond Review, Mar. 1992, pp. 109-114. |
Warren et al., PDC Bits, What's Needed to Meet Tomorrow's Challenge, SPE 27978, University of Tulsa Centennial Petroleum Engineering Symposium, Aug. 1994, pp. 207-214. |
Wells et al., Bit Balling Mitigation in PDC Bit Design, International Association of Drilling Contractors/Society of Petroleum Engineers—IADC/SPE 114673, IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Indonesia, Aug. 25-27, 2008. |
Williams et al., An Analysis of the Performance of PDC Hybrid Drill Bits, SPE/IADC 16117, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Mar. 1987, pp. 585-594. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/061239 dated May 20, 2010, 3 pages. |
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/061239 dated May 20, 2010, 3 pages. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/057373, mailed Apr. 30, 2010. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/083532, mailed Feb. 25, 2009. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/069095, mailed Jul. 29, 2010. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/050672, mailed Mar. 3, 2010. |
Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/042514, mailed Nov. 27, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/068401 mailed Jul. 28, 2010, 3 pages. |
“EZCase Casing Bit System,” © 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated, www.HCCbits.com, 2 pages. |
“EZReam Casing/Liner Shoe,” © 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated, www.HCCbits.com, 2 pages. |
“GaugePro XPR Expandable Reamer,” © 2008 Baker Hughes Incorporated, www.HCCbits.com, 2 pages. |
Creating E&P Value, inDepth TM, vol. 10, No. 1, 2004, © 2004 Baker Hughes Incorporated, pp. 6-60. |
Ream-While-Drilling Technology Operations Manual (RWD2), © 2007 Baker Hughes Incorporated, pp. 6-148. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2009/061632 mailed May 10, 2010, 3 pages. |
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/061632 mailed May 10, 2010, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100104736 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |