This invention relates to an apparatus that is operable to block the inertial actuated movement of a component in an automobile and, more particularly, to a blocking mechanism that prevents a door latch lever from moving during a crash event.
A door on an automobile includes a latching mechanism that has the function of securing the door in a closed position. An actuation device is operable to release the latching mechanism to permit the door to be opened as desired for ingress and egress with respect to the passenger compartment of the automobile. Mechanically actuated latching mechanisms typically include a latch lever that is connected to the actuation lever to move generally linearly in response to a corresponding movement of the actuation lever. Typically, the actuation lever is pivotally supported on the door to affect a release of the latching mechanism.
During a crash event, the momentum of the vehicle can cause the latch lever to move inertially and affect an undesired opening of the latching mechanism. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a blocking mechanism that would be operable to prevent the inertially movable latch lever from moving during a crash event, yet allow the normal operation of the latching mechanism to permit the desired opening and closing of the door. It would be further desirable that the blocking mechanism would be operable to reset after the crash event to allow the selective release of the latching mechanism for the opening of the door.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,583,741, granted to Werner Breitschwerdt on Jun. 8, 1971, a lock arrangement for automotive doors balances the inertial forces incurred during a crash event through force absorbing springs and a weighted pivot lever. A door handle assembly that precludes an inadvertent opening of the latch mechanism upon a side impact crash event is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,099,052, granted to Larry Spitzley on Aug. 8, 2000.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,481, issued to Alexander Buschmann on Feb. 2, 1999, discloses a door latch that is constructed in a manner as to prevent unlatching during a collision. An L-shaped blocking lever is pivotal between blocking and non-blocking positions by means of a spring. The blocking lever is pivoted by inertial forces to come into alignment with a camming point, which causes the latch to stay closed during impact. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,648,382, granted on Nov. 18, 2003, to Stefan Monig teaches a pivotable latching member secured in position by a torsion spring and a stationary stop in a housing. During a crash event, the inertial forces will overcome the spring force and move the latching member into position where the latching end of the latching member is supported on a support location of the housing to block the movement of the outer door handle.
In U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/018537, published on Aug. 25, 2005, an inertia activated assembly is disclosed to cause the latching mechanism of a vehicle door handle to resist opening from the frame during a crash event. A spring restrains a weight component to be seated against the housing. During a crash event, the weight component is set into motion and will travel outwardly with respect to the cone-shaped hole in the housing and away from the housing. The weight component along with the locking tab prevents rotation of the pivoting cam to prevent the door latch from being opened.
It is an object of this invention to overcome the aforementioned disadvantages of the known prior art by providing a blocking apparatus to prevent the movement of a latch lever during a crash event.
It is another object of this invention to provide a blocking apparatus that can reset after the crash event to permit normal operation of the latching mechanism to open the door of the vehicle as desired.
It is still another object of this invention to provide a plunger engagable with the latch lever to restrict movement thereof when a pivoted blocking member is moved out of alignment due to the external application of crash forces.
It is an advantage of this invention that the blocking member is biased by spring forces into alignment with a plunger engaged with the latch lever.
It is another advantage of this invention that the spring forces can recenter the blocking member after being knocked out of alignment from forces incurred during a crash event.
It is a feature of this invention that the latch lever is formed with a cam surface that engages a plunger to cause movement of a plunger in response to the movement of the latch lever while operating the latching mechanism
It is another feature of this invention that the blocking mechanism will prevent movement of the latch lever during a crash event by restricting movement of the engaged plunger.
It is still another feature of this invention that the blocking member can be formed in different configurations that are pivotally supported in a housing to move into a plunger blocking position when external crash forces are incurred.
It is still another advantage of this invention that the blocking apparatus can be used with any linearly movable component to block movement thereof during a crash event.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a device to stop the undesired motion of a lever inside a door latch during a crash event that is durable in construction, inexpensive of manufacture, carefree of maintenance, facile in assemblage, and simple and effective in use.
These and other objects, features and advantages are accomplished according to the instant invention by providing a blocking apparatus cooperable with the latch lever of a vehicle door latching mechanism to prevent the latch lever from moving during a crash event, which in turn prevents the latching mechanism from allowing the vehicle door to open. The blocking apparatus includes a housing supporting a linearly movable plunger engagable with a cam surface on the latch lever and a blocking member pivotally mounted for movement between a normal position and a blocking position. The blocking member moves into the blocking position due to the imposition of crash forces on the blocking member during a crash event. A centering spring mechanism biases the blocking member into the normal position and can return the blocking member into the normal position to permit movement of the latch lever after the crash event has occurred. The plunger is biased into engagement with the latch lever so as to move with the cam surface.
The advantages of this invention will become apparent upon consideration of the following detailed disclosure of the invention, especially when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to
The first embodiment of the blocking apparatus 30 is depicted in
One skilled in the art will readily recognize that the latch lever 22 is a movable member that causes the plunger 32 to move inwardly into the housing 31 when the latching mechanism 20 is actuated. The latch lever 22 could be pivotally movable, as well as linearly movable, so long as a cam surface 25 of some configuration engages the plunger 32 to force the plunger 32 into the housing 31 upon the movement of the latch lever 22.
The housing 31 also pivotally supports an inertial mass member 35 from the pivot 37. The inertial member 35 has a cavity 36 formed therein for the insertion of the plunger 32 when the cam surface 25 pushes the plunger 32 into the housing, as is depicted in
As is shown in
A second embodiment of the blocking apparatus 30 can be seen in
As is depicted in
The normal opening and closing of the door 12, 13 is not affected by the blocking apparatus 30, as the pulling of the door handle 15 pushes the cam surface 25 into engagement with the plunger 32 to push the plunger 32 into housing 31. With the first embodiment depicted in
A bell-type of inertial member 50 is depicted in the third and fourth embodiments shown in
The inertial bell 50 pivotally engages the housing 31 at the depression 52 formed therein to be engaged with the inertial bell 50. When the plunger 32 is moved inwardly into the housing 31, as is depicted in
One skilled in the art will recognize that the relief pocket 58 need only be formed on one side of the inertial bell 50 to correspond to the direction of the inertial crash forces that would cause an actuation movement of the latch lever. If the inertial crash forces were directed in the opposite direction, the latch lever will not be urged into an actuating position and the blocking apparatus 30 does not need to be activated.
A more simplified version of the inertial bell 50 is depicted in
It will be understood that changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangements of parts which have been described and illustrated to explain the nature of the invention will occur to and may be made by those skilled in the art upon a reading of this disclosure within the principles and scope of the invention. The foregoing description illustrates the preferred embodiment of the invention; however, concepts, as based upon the description, may be employed in other embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
32990 | Ellis | Aug 1861 | A |
3583741 | Breitschwerdt | Jun 1971 | A |
3799596 | Nozomu et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
5690371 | Turnbull | Nov 1997 | A |
5865481 | Buschmann | Feb 1999 | A |
6099052 | Spitzley | Aug 2000 | A |
6648382 | Monig | Nov 2003 | B1 |
20050184537 | Le | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060237973 | Anguila | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261602 | Jankowski et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261603 | Cetnar et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070085349 | Merideth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080111381 A1 | May 2008 | US |