The invention relates to a system and a tool for joining a coupling element, for example, a joining flange means, to a pipe, said coupling element surrounding the pipe and having grooves facing the pipe and intended to receive a corresponding plurality of beads provided on the pipe and a coupling element connectable to a pipe, said coupling element configured to surround the pipe and having grooves to face the pipe and to receive a corresponding plurality of beads provided on the pipe.
1. Field of the Invention
Flanges of many types and varieties are used extensively in industry when pipe-to-pipe or pipe-to-other component connections are to be provided. The welding of flanges to pipes is the most common method in the case of steel pipes and standard weldable metals, whilst, for example, screw flanges are used in connection with, for instance, galvanised pipes.
2. Description of Related Art
In recent years a number of methods have been developed for the fastening of coupling elements and the joining of pipes by deforming the pipe inside the coupling so as to secure it. Other methods and equipment which clamp the coupling to the outside of the pipe without any or with little deformation of the pipe have also been developed. Examples of such methods are taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,593,448 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,147,385. DE 27 24 257 and U.S. Pat. No. 2,252,274 teach tools with rollers which by means of a rotating cone in the centre with rollers therearound will deform the pipe so that it fits into grooves in the coupling elements. DE 3144385 teaches a joining system for pipes where radially movable ridges, with the aid of hydraulic pressure against underlying pistons, press in beads. However, as discussed further below, the pipe wall on the side of the beads will buckle inwards, and when the ridges of the tool are retracted, the actual bead in the pipe will also retract somewhat, which makes the connection weak. In addition, there will be a metal-to-metal seal between pipe and coupling element, and therefore the system taught in the said document will require sealing material in the grooves of the coupling element. It has been found that with radial pistons as taught in DE 3144385 it is not possible to obtain an especially large radial force, and this principle could perhaps be used with particularly thin-walled pipes.
To deform a pipe wall into grooves in a surrounding coupling element requires very large forces if the pipe wall is to be pressed radially outwards. The use of rollers as described in DE 27 24 257 and U.S. Pat. No. 2,252,274 means that less radial force is required, but on the other hand the tool must be secured to the pipe and therefore becomes large so and heavy. Rolling subjects the material to harsher treatment and also takes longer than radial pressing.
The object of the invention is to provide a system for joining flanges or other coupling elements to pipes where the tool is only operated radially so that a fixing of the pipe is not necessary. Furthermore, it is an object to obtain a tool which even in connection with small pipe dimensions has enough force to deform beads in relatively thick pipe walls. It is also an object that the tool should function so that inward tapering of the pipe end, which has been found to be a problem in connection with the radial pressing of beads, is avoided.
a-c show a pipe 1 and coupling element 2 before beads 5, 6 are created.
a and 2b show the coupling element 2 fitted onto a pipe 1 and with beads 5, 6 pressed into place into recesses in the coupling element, the coupling element having a flange for attachment to another coupling element (not shown).
a and 3b show a thin wall coupling 8.
a and 10b show a coupling element structure 30 with flanges 30′, 30″ being tiltable relative to the structure 30 by movability over the partially spherical surface of the coupling element 30.
The principle of the tool is shown in
During the development of the apparatus according to the invention, which comprises both an interior configuration of the external coupling element 2; 2′ and the tool which forms the beads 5, 6, it was quickly discovered that the most critical parameter for optimal attachment resides in the configuration of the parts 11, 11 of the tool that presses the beads 5, 6 out from the pipe and also a part 14 of the tool that is to prevent the end of the pipe 1 from tapering inwards during the pressing operation.
In the accompanying drawings:
a is a side view of the pipe and coupling, before the beads are pressed in;
b is a sectional view taken along the line A-A of
c is a fragmentary enlargement of portion B of
a is a side view of the pipe and coupling of
b is a sectional view taken along the line A-A of
a is a side view of another embodiment of the pipe and coupling;
b is a sectional view taken along the line A-A of
a is a side view of a further embodiment of the pipe and coupling, before the beads are pressed in;
b is a sectional view taken along the line A-A of
c is a side view of the pipe and coupling of
d is a sectional view taken along the line B-B of
a shows the principle of a tool to deform the beads;
b is a section view taken along the line A-A of
a is side view of a further embodiment of the tool;
b is a top view of a segment of
a is a side view of a still further embodiment of the pipe and coupling;
b is a sectional view along the line A-A of
The invention is now to be described in further detail with reference to the attached drawing figures.
a-1c and 2b show that an outermost portion 2′ of the coupling element 2 against which pipe end 1′ rests is flared outwards. This is to allow the tool to give the pipe end 1′ an overbending outwards, which is necessary because the pipe end as mentioned, will otherwise tend to taper inwards. Thus, the pipe 1 will appear almost straight after the beads 5, 6 have been pressed, as can be seen in the section shown in
The same basic interior configuration of the coupling elements will apply to a coupling element or collar intended for loose flanges, movable flanges as shown in
It should be mentioned that the cylindrical part of the coupling element 2 as shown on
Laboratory tests carried out show that a mechanically good seal is obtained between the grooves 3, 4 and the beads 5, 6 Nevertheless, it may be appropriate to insert a sealing material in one or more of the grooves.
According to
The segments 10 and especially the ridges 11 are subjected to extremely large stresses during the pressing operation and are therefore made of hardened steel. Consequently large radial forces are also required to operate the segments 10. As an example thereof, the pressing of a connection between a coupling element 2 and a steel pipe 1 with an outer diameter of 76 mm and a wall thickness of 3.2 mm as shown on
a and 9b show a tool with hydraulically operated segments 22. A segment 22 is shown separately and it can be seen that the segment 22 is fastened to a piston 27 which can move in a corresponding cylinder 28 in a housing 24 which is filled with oil. The segments 22 have circle sector ridges 23 to create beads. The illustrated tool has a total of eight pistons 27 and eight cylinders 28. When a rod 25 is pressed into the housing, the oil in the housing 24 will press the pistons 27 outwards. The greater the diameter of the piston 27 in relation to the diameter of the rod 25, the greater the force amplification. Reference numeral 21 denotes a tool attachment flange, the flange having a plurality of attachment holes 26.
A cold joining of the coupling element 2 to the pipe 1 in this manner, unlike, for example, welding, that the material of the coupling is not given a modified surface structure. Therefore, the invention is suitable for couplings as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20041215 | Mar 2004 | NO | national |
This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/599,162 filed Sep. 21, 2006, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,056,208 on Nov. 15, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1753005 | Grady | Apr 1930 | A |
2252274 | Rossheim et al. | Aug 1941 | A |
3730567 | Webster | May 1973 | A |
4147385 | van der Velden | Apr 1979 | A |
4154464 | Stary | May 1979 | A |
4388013 | Bergheim et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4413395 | Garnier | Nov 1983 | A |
4530145 | Bergheim et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4593448 | Ferrari Aggradi et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4934038 | Caudill | Jun 1990 | A |
5335729 | Turner et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
6517126 | Peterson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
7737391 | Jan 1990 | AU |
628743 | Sep 1992 | AU |
2724257 | Dec 1977 | DE |
3144385 | May 1983 | DE |
0570178 | Nov 1993 | EP |
841869 | Jul 1960 | GB |
33004410 | Jun 1933 | JP |
56030689 | Mar 1981 | JP |
56083684 | Jul 1981 | JP |
56131026 | Oct 1981 | JP |
59147917 | Oct 1984 | JP |
61063330 | Apr 1986 | JP |
61133229 | Aug 1986 | JP |
10318452 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2159689 | Nov 2000 | RU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110109082 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10599162 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12940539 | US |