Apparatus for cooling an airfoil for a gas turbine engine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6210112
  • Patent Number
    6,210,112
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 11, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 3, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A hollow airfoil is provided which includes a body, a trench, and a plurality of cooling apertures disposed within the trench. The body extends chordwise between a leading edge and a trailing edge, and spanwise between an outer radial surface and an inner radial surface, and includes an external wall surrounding a cavity. The trench is disposed in the external wall along the leading edge, extends in a spanwise direction, and is aligned with a stagnation line extending along the leading edge.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




This invention relates to cooled rotor blades and/or stator vanes for gas turbines in general, and to apparatus and methods for cooling the leading edge and establishing film cooling along the surface of the rotor blade or stator vane in particular.




2. Background Information




In the turbine section of a gas turbine engine, core gas travels through a plurality of stator vane and rotor blade stages. Each stator vane or rotor blade has an airfoil with one or more internal cavities surrounded by an external wall. The suction and pressure sides of the external wall extend between the leading and trailing edges of the airfoil. Stator vane airfoils extend spanwise between inner and outer platforms and the rotor blade airfoils extend spanwise between a platform and a blade tip.




High temperature core gas (which includes air and combustion products) encountering the leading edge of an airfoil will diverge around the suction and pressure sides of the airfoil, or impinge on the leading edge. The point along the leading edge where the velocity of the core gas flow goes to zero (i.e., the impingement point) is referred to as the stagnation point. There is a stagnation point at every spanwise position along the leading edge of the airfoil, and collectively those points are referred to as the stagnation line. Air impinging on the leading edge of the airfoil is subsequently diverted around either side of the airfoil.




The precise location of each stagnation point along the length of the leading edge is a function of the angle of incidence of the core gas relative to the chordline of the airfoil, for both rotor and stator airfoils. In addition to the angle of incidence, the stagnation point of a rotor airfoil is also a function of the rotational velocity of the airfoil and the velocity of the core gas. Given the curvature of the leading edge, the approaching core gas direction and velocity, and the rotational speed of the airfoil (if any), the location of the stagnation points along the leading edge can be readily determined by means well-known in the art. In actual practice, rotor speeds and core gas velocities vary depending upon engine operating conditions as a function of time and position along the span of the airfoil. As a result, the stagnation points (or collectively the stagnation line) along the leading edge of an airfoil will move relative to the leading edge.




Cooling air, typically bled off of a compressor stage at a temperature lower and pressure higher than the core gas passing through the turbine section, is used to cool the airfoils. The cooler compressor air provides the medium for heat transfer and the difference in pressure provides the energy required to pass the cooling air through the stator or rotor stage.




In many cases, it is desirable to establish film cooling along the surface of the stator or rotor airfoil. A film of cooling air traveling along the surface of the airfoil transfers thermal energy away from the airfoil, increases the uniformity of the cooling, and insulates the airfoil from the passing hot core gas. A person of skill in the art will recognize, however, that film cooling is difficult to establish and maintain in the turbulent environment of a gas turbine. In most cases, film cooling air is bled out of cooling apertures extending through the external wall of the airfoil. The term “bled” reflects the small difference in pressure motivating the cooling air out of the internal cavity of the airfoil.




One of the problems associated with using apertures to establish a cooling air film is the films sensitivity to pressure difference across the apertures. Too great a pressure difference across an aperture will cause the air to jet out into the passing core gas rather than aid in the formation of a film of cooling air. Too small a pressure difference will result in negligible cooling air flow through the aperture, or an in-flow of hot core gas. Both cases adversely affect film cooling effectiveness. Another problem associated with using apertures to establish film cooling is that cooling air is dispensed from discrete points along the span of the airfoil, rather than along a continuous line. The gaps between the apertures, and areas immediately downstream of those gaps, are exposed to less cooling air than are the apertures and the spaces immediately downstream of the apertures, and are therefore more susceptible to thermal degradation. Another problem associated with using apertures to establish film cooling is the stress concentrations that accompany the apertures. Film cooling effectiveness generally increases when the apertures are closely packed and skewed at a shallow angle relative to the external surface of the airfoil. Skewed, closely packed apertures, however, create stress concentrations.




Some prior art discloses the use of a porous transpiration strip disposed in a recess as a means to create a plenum in a forward portion of an airfoil. The transpiration strip has an arcuate outer profile that, when attached to the recess, provides the airfoil with an aerodynamic leading edge profile. Air entering the plenum through metering holes diffuses through the transpiration strip. A problem with this approach, particularly in those instances where the transpiration strip extends between the pressure and suction sides through the leading edge, is that pressure gradients along the leading can influence where cooling air exits the transpiration strip along the leading edge. The high pressure region that typically resides adjacent the stagnation line of an airfoil during operation, for example, will force cooling air to exit the transpiration strip in regions of lesser pressure. As a result, the leading edge region aligned with the stagnation line, which is typically subjected to some of the highest temperatures, may not be cooled as effectively as other regions of the transpiration strip. Another problem with transpiration cooling occurs when the strip becomes clogged with debris. The debris can inhibit or prevent cooling air from reaching portions of the strip, leaving those portions susceptible to undesirably high temperatures and consequent thermal degradation.




What is needed is an apparatus that provides adequate cooling along the leading edge of an airfoil, one that accommodates a variable position stagnation line, one that creates a uniform and durable cooling air film downstream of the leading edge on both sides of the airfoil, and one that creates minimal stress concentrations in the airfoil wall.




DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION




It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide an airfoil having improved cooling along the leading edge.




It is another object of the present invention to provide an airfoil with leading edge cooling apparatus that accommodates a plurality of stagnation lines.




It is another object of the present invention to provide an airfoil with leading edge cooling apparatus that establishes uniform and durable film cooling downstream of the leading edge on both sides of the airfoil.




It is another object of the present invention to provide an airfoil with leading edge cooling apparatus that creates minimal stress concentrations within the airfoil wall.




According to the present invention, a hollow airfoil is provided which includes a body, a trench, and a plurality of cooling apertures disposed within the trench. The body extends chordwise between leading and trailing edges and spanwise between inner and outer radial surfaces, and includes an external wall surrounding an internal cavity. The trench is disposed in the external wall along the leading edge, extends in a spanwise direction, and is aligned with a stagnation line extending along the leading edge.




According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for cooling an airfoil is provided wherein a trench is provided disposed in the external wall of the airfoil. The trench is aligned with a stagnation line for the airfoil.




An advantage of the present invention is that uniform and durable film cooling downstream of the leading edge is provided on both sides of the airfoil. The cooling air bleeds out of the trench on both sides and creates continuous film cooling downstream of the leading edge. The trench minimizes cooling losses characteristic of cooling apertures, and thereby provides more cooling air for film development and maintenance.




Another advantage of the present invention is that stress is minimized along the leading edge and areas immediately downstream of the leading edge. The trench of cooling air that extends continuously along the leading edge minimizes thermally induced stress by eliminating the discrete cooling points separated by uncooled areas characteristic of conventional cooling schemes. The uniform film of cooling air that exits from both sides of the trench also minimizes thermally induced stress by eliminating uncooled zones between and downstream of cooling apertures characteristic of conventional cooling schemes.




Another advantage of the present invention is that the leading edge cooling apparatus accommodates a plurality of stagnation lines. In the most preferable embodiment, the trench is preferably centered on the stagnation line which coincides with the largest heat load operating condition for a given application, and the width of the trench is preferably large enough such that the stagnation line will not travel outside of the side walls of the trench under all operating conditions. As a result, the present invention provides improved leading edge cooling and cooling air film formation relative to conventional cooling schemes.




These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in light of the detailed description of the best mode embodiment thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic perspective view of a turbine rotor blade for a gas turbine engine.





FIG. 2

is a partial sectional view of the airfoil portion of the rotor blade shown in

FIG. 1

, including core gas flow lines to illustrate the relative position of the trench and the stagnation point of the airfoil. The partial sectional view of the airfoil shown in this drawing also represents the airfoil of a stator vane.





FIG. 3

is a diagrammatic sectional view of a trench disposed in the leading edge of an airfoil.











BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a gas turbine engine turbine rotor blade


10


includes a root portion


12


, a platform


14


, an airfoil


16


, a trench


18


disposed in the airfoil


16


, and a blade tip


20


. The airfoil


16


comprises one or more internal cavities


22


(see

FIG. 2

) surrounded by an external wall


24


, at least one of which is proximate the leading edge


26


of the airfoil


16


. The suction side


28


and the pressure side


30


of the external wall


24


extend chordwise between the leading edge


26


and the trailing edge


32


of the airfoil


16


, and spanwise between the platform


14


and the blade tip


20


. The leading edge


26


has a smoothly curved contour which blends with the suction side


28


and pressure side


30


of the airfoil


16


.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the trench


18


includes a base


34


and a pair of side walls


36


disposed in the external wall


24


along the leading edge


26


, preferably extending substantially the entire span of the airfoil


16


. A plurality of cooling apertures


38


provide passages between the trench


18


and the forward most internal cavity


22


for cooling air. The shape of the cooling apertures


38


and their position within the trench


18


will vary depending upon the application.

FIG. 2

includes streamlines


40


representing core gas within the core gas path to illustrate the direction of core gas relative to the airfoil


16


.




As stated earlier, the stagnation point


42


(or in collective terms, the stagnation line) at any particular position along the span will move depending upon the engine operating condition at hand. The trench


18


is preferably centered on those stagnation points


42


which coincide with the largest heat load operating condition for a given application, and the width


44


of the trench


18


is preferably large enough such that the stagnation line


42


will not travel outside of the side walls


36


of the trench


18


under all operating conditions. If, however, it is not possible to provide a trench


18


wide enough to accommodate all possible stagnation line


42


positions, then the width


44


and the position of the trench


18


are chosen to accommodate the greatest number of stagnation lines


42


that coincide with the highest heat load operating conditions. The most appropriate trench width


44


and depth


46


for a given application can be determined by empirical study. Referring to

FIG. 3

for example, empirical studies indicate that a trench


18


for a rotor airfoil


16


having a depth


46


substantially equal to one (1) cooling aperture


38


diameter (“D”) and a width


44


substantially equal to three (3) cooling aperture


38


diameters (“3D”), where the cooling aperture


38


is that which is disposed within the trench


18


, provides favorable leading edge


26


cooling and downstream cooling air film formation.




In the operation of the invention, cooling air typically bled off of a compressor stage (not shown) is routed into the airfoil


16


of the rotor blade


10


(or stator vane) by means well known in the art. Cooling air disposed within the internal cavity


22


proximate the leading edge


26


of the airfoil


16


is at a lower temperature and higher pressure than the core gas flowing past the external wall


24


of the airfoil


16


. The pressure difference across the airfoil external wall


24


forces the internal cooling air to enter the cooling apertures


38


and subsequently pass into the trench


18


located in the external wall


24


along the leading edge


26


. The cooling air exiting the cooling apertures


38


diffuses into the air already in the trench


18


and distributes within the trench


18


. The cooling air subsequently exits the trench


18


in a substantially uniform manner over the side walls


36


of the trench


18


. The exiting flow forms a film of cooling air on both sides of the trench


18


that extends downstream.




One of the advantages of distributing cooling air within the trench


18


is that the pressure difference problems characteristic of conventional cooling apertures (not shown) are minimized. For example, the difference in pressure across a cooling aperture


38


is a function of the local internal cavity


22


pressure and the local core gas pressure adjacent the aperture


38


. Both of these pressures vary as a function of time. If the core gas pressure is high and the internal cavity pressure is low adjacent a particular cooling aperture in a conventional scheme (not shown), undesirable hot core gas in-flow can occur. The present invention minimizes the opportunity for the undesirable in-flow because the cooling air from all apertures


38


distributes and increases in uniformity within the trench


18


, thereby decreasing the opportunity for any low pressure zones to occur. Likewise, the distribution of cooling air within the trench


18


also avoids cooling air pressure spikes which, in a conventional scheme, would jet the cooling air into the core gas rather than add it to the film of cooling air downstream.




Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to the detailed embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. For example,

FIG. 2

shows a partial sectional view of an airfoil


16


. The airfoil


16


may be that of a stator vane or a rotor blade.



Claims
  • 1. A hollow airfoil, comprising:a body having an external wall surrounding an internal cavity and a spanwise extending leading edge; an open trench disposed in said external wall along said leading edge and extending in a spanwise direction, said trench having a first side wall, a second side wall, and a base extending between said first and second side walls; wherein said side walls are sufficiently spaced apart such that under substantially all operating conditions said stagnation line is substantially disposed between said first and second side walls; and a plurality of cooling apertures disposed within said trench and extending through said external wall, thereby providing a cooling air passage between said internal cavity and said trench, each said cooling aperture having a diameter.
  • 2. The hollow airfoil of claim 1, wherein each said cooling aperture has a diameter, and said trench has a depth substantially equal to said diameter and a width substantially equal to three of said diameters.
  • 3. The hollow airfoil of claim 1, wherein said trench includes a depth and a width, and said width is greater than said depth.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuing application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/992,322, having a filing date of Dec. 17, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,050,777.

US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
3836283 Matsuki et al. Sep 1974
5253976 Cunha Oct 1993
5356265 Kercher Oct 1994
5690473 Kercher Nov 1997
5779437 Abdel-Messeh et al. Jul 1998
6050777 Tabbita et al. Apr 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
435906 Oct 1935 GB
2127105 Apr 1984 GB
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/992322 Dec 1997 US
Child 09/480956 US