Apparatus for cooling and packaging bulk fresh products

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6189299
  • Patent Number
    6,189,299
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 10, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 20, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
Methods and apparatus for packaging whole or partially processed bulk, fresh products under modified atmosphere including placing such produce into bags or other containers for the produce, attaching to the opening at the top of each of the bags or containers a tube having an openable and closable lid, placing the bags or other containers with the tubes attached thereto inside a vacuum chamber, withdrawing air from the vacuum chamber from the bags or other containers until the oxygen concentration in the bags or other containers has reached a desired level, refilling the bags or other containers with one or more gases other than air while restoring the pressure inside the vacuum chamber and outside the bags or other containers at rates sufficient to minimize crushing or bruising of produce in the bags or other containers as the pressure in the vacuum chamber rises from the reduced level to a desired, ambient level.
Description




This invention provides methods and apparatus for storing and for shipping whole or partially processed bulk fresh products under modified atmosphere that can extend the shelf life of the produce.




This invention provides methods and apparatus for gas flushing containers of fresh produce to form reduced oxygen environments in such containers without bruising the produce.




These methods and apparatus simultaneously evacuate air around and inside produce containers, minimizing pressure differentials which could cause crushing or bruising of the produce.




This invention is particularly directed to the prevention of bruising the produce while inhibiting enzymatic reactions resulting in oxidative browning and product breakdown.




This invention also provides means for obtaining specifically selected absolute pressures inside a vacuum chamber which establishes desired ratios of oxygen to inert gas inside one or more containers inside such a chamber.




The fresh produce industry continues to experience rapid growth in the production and distribution of packaged salads. The consumer is given the convenience of a fresh tasting salad, washed and ready to serve. Fresh produce is often packaged in flexible plastic bags that are designed to contain an oxygen reduced environment to prevent oxidation discoloration. More frequently, chopped, sliced or shredded produce, for example lettuce, is packaged in bags containing 10 pounds or less of product. Such fresh produce is first placed in a semi-permeable polyethylene or similar bag, and all or a portion of the air in the filled bag is withdrawn by squeezing or suctioning the bag.




Some packaging methods introduce an inert gas to replace air so removed. As air is removed from these bags, the cut pieces of produce are squeezed closely together, eliminating most of the voids where air would otherwise remain. These methods provide unacceptable results when the produce weight in the bag exceeds fifty pounds or more because of the resulting crushing and bruising of produce.




Atmospheric pressure at sea level exerts a force of approximately 14.7 pounds per square inch. To remove an adequate amount of ambient air from a large bag containing in excess of 100 pounds of fresh produce, the pressure inside the bag is often lowered to less than 3.7 pounds per square inch. The resulting differential pressure could equal or exceed 11 pounds of force on each square inch of bag surface area. For example, a whole lettuce head or like produce in contact with 16 square inches of bag surface receives a force equal to or greater than 176 pounds. This head is pressed against others inside the bag, transferring the forces to them, and causing additional crushing and bruising of the leaves and rib structure in the produce.




When a fresh produce container is rigid with airtight seals, our unique gas flushing methods and apparatus are particularly advantageous. When drawing a vacuum on such containers, the forces exerted by atmospheric pressure outside such containers can cause damage. For example, a rigid, airtight container shaped as a four foot cube experiences over 25,000 lbs of force on each side when the differential air pressure reaches 11 pounds per square inch, for a combined force of over 150,000 lbs. The construction requirements for such a container are too costly, and its empty weight too impractical for commercial use. By gas flushing such containers inside a vacuum chamber, the differential pressures are eliminated, simplifying the construction requirements for such containers.




Fresh produce has good shelf life if field heat is removed and the produce is held at a reduced temperature e.g., 33-38° F., but above freezing. Heads of lettuce deteriorate more rapidly in an oxygen-rich than in an oxygen-lean atmosphere. It is therefore desirable to store and transport cold lettuce in an environment low in oxygen concentration. When lettuce heads are partially processed in the field, either by removing the core and waste leaves, or by cutting a head into leaf pieces, the enzymatic reactions which cause deterioration accelerate. An uncut, intact lettuce head displays acceptable shelf life in environments with oxygen concentration above 5% by volume. A partially processed or fully processed lettuce head displays oxidative discoloration in a gaseous atmosphere containing above 5% oxygen by volume. Our methods can lower the oxygen concentration inside containers of lettuce heads to less than 4.0% by volume and above 0.5% oxygen without crushing or bruising the produce.




A fresh produce processor harvests and transports produce to a processing facility for chopping and slicing. In addition to transporting that portion of the fresh produce used in the salad, the processor is also hauling waste leaves, stems, cores, etc. Any damage to the fresh produce from harvesting, packing into bulk containers, or transporting to a processing facility may also result in discolored leaves from oxidation at damaged points. These leaves are also discarded as waste. Total waste may exceed 25% of the total weight in head lettuce and 40% of the total weight in romaine lettuce. The ability to ship bulk bins of produce to a processor with reduced waste offers substantial cost savings.




Our methods and apparatus improve reproducibility, and consistently form gaseous environments of desired oxygen concentration in containers for 50 pounds, 100 pounds or more of lettuce heads, other bulk leafy green produce, and other fruits and vegetables, while minimizing crushing and bruising.




Our methods and apparatus also speed produce packaging through batch processing of multiple containers, or large single containers.




Our methods of gas flushing take place inside vacuum chambers. One or more containers, e.g. bags of fresh produce are placed inside the chamber. A manifold including a tube with a hinged lid or butterfly valve on the top end, and a gas flush line attached to the side, is placed at the opening of each container. The opening atop the produce filled container, preferably a bag, is drawn tightly around the tube and affixed with a rubber band, string tie, elastic strap, ring clamp or similar device to seal the opening around the tube. Air is withdrawn from each bag and from the vacuum chamber by a vacuum pump. Air withdrawn from a container of produce flows through the tube, past an open, hinged lid, or open butterfly valve, and into the chamber for evacuation. Little difference in pressure exists between the inside and outside of the liner bag, minimizing crushing or bruising of produce in each bag during the vacuum cycle.




When the pressure inside the bag is at a desired, low level, corresponding for example to a desired, reduced oxygen concentration in the bag, the vacuum pump is stopped. Gravity, a solenoid actuator or an electric motor closes, and holds the lid closed on the top of each tube. Inert gas, e.g., nitrogen gas, is then introduced into each bag through a gas flush hose at a rate approximating the rate at which air is introduced into the vacuum chamber through a valve outside the produce bag. The produce bag is filled with a desired replacement gas until the pressure inside and outside the bag, but inside the vacuum chamber, is at or near the pressure outside the chamber. The chamber is then opened, the liner bag(s) is sealed below the tube with a tie wrap, wire tie, elastic band, heat seal, hermetic seal, or an equivalent closure, and the tube is removed.




Fresh produce, such as leafy vegetables, is vacuum cooled before storage and transport. Our methods can be combined with such cooling processes in which leafy vegetables like lettuce reach a desired temperature with both air and water vapor escaping a produce bag through a manifold tube. Such vacuum cooling may reduce the air pressure inside the vacuum chamber to a level of 4.5 to 5.0 mm Hg absolute. The chamber is then vented slightly to raise the pressure above 10 mm Hg absolute, or whatever absolute pressure value is necessary for the desired final oxygen level in the produce bag. Our methods can then follow. Alternatively, by performing our methods simultaneously with vacuum cooling, a second vacuum need not be drawn on the produce. Fresh produce which has first been cooled by any method can be placed in a vacuum chamber and gas flushed using our methods and apparatus.




As an alternative, bins of fresh fruits or vegetables can be placed into the vacuum chamber and the air withdrawn from the chamber with a vacuum pump or venturi. When the chamber air pressure is reduced to a desired level, e.g., to an absolute pressure of 4.5 to 5.0 mm Hg, the entire chamber and each produce bag in the chamber can be filled with nitrogen or other inert gas, restoring the chamber to ambient pressure. This alternative method is suitable for use with double stacked bins, double height bins, or other large vessels for holding and transporting fresh produce. When flushing the entire vacuum chamber, liner bags for produce may be used, but are not required. Bins or rigid containers may be constructed using built-in valves or membranes to release atmospheric air during the vacuum cycle, and to admit nitrogen or other inert/active gases during a chamber refilling cycle.




Because the inert/active gas sources may be low in water vapor, some embodiments of our methods introduce moisture with inert/active gas from bladders or bags outside the vacuum chamber, or another source, prior to or during the flushing cycle. Such moisture helps retain the freshness of the produce during subsequent storage and transit.




Our methods and apparatus are useful with several types of produce, fresh fruits and fresh vegetables. Enzyme concentration and enzymatic reactions resulting in oxidative browning vary among such products. These variations may be magnified when such products have been partially or fully processed, as by cutting, slicing, shredding or coring. Our methods and apparatus can advantageously establish specific, desired concentrations of oxygen in large containers for a large quantity of such products, and can accommodate varying crop conditions, and varying packaging mediums.




In some embodiments of our methods and apparatus, multiple inert gases may replace air inside produce containers. Multiple gasses may be pre-blended, or introduced concurrently or serially into the vacuum chamber through multiple sources. For example, some fruits, like strawberries, exhibit good shelf life when stored in nitrogen gas blended with carbon dioxide gas, and a low oxygen concentration. Our methods permit inflow of precisely blended inert and active gas mixtures into a produce container at desired oxygen concentrations.











These and other features and objects of the invention together with illustrative procedures for practicing the invention, will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the accompanying drawings in which:





FIG. 1

shows diagrammatically an embodiment of the Inert Gas Flushing System (IGFS), particularly the vacuum chamber (end view) containing a transport shuttle loaded with Individual Bins of Fresh Produce (IBFP). The Gas Flush Manifold (GFM) is shown placed on the IBFP, connected to the IBFP's individually by each GFM tube at each tube ring. The GFM is shown connected to a hose, which is connected to the vacuum chamber through a gas flush valve. The gas flush system shows one feasible inert gas source, liquid nitrogen, supplied in gas form, from inert gas bladders.





FIG. 2

shows additional details of the IGFS and its inert gas bladders and the exterior flow path from such bladders shown in

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

shows a first embodiment of a gas flush manifold tube with a spring or gravity lid;





FIG. 4

shows a second embodiment of a gas flush manifold tube with a solenoid or motor controlled lid;





FIG. 5

shows a third embodiment of a gas flush manifold tube with a butterfly type valve or closure driven by either a solenoid or motor;





FIG. 6

shows a GFM embodiment including a gas flush hose, nozzle, and tube with its lid in an open position;





FIG. 7

shows IBFP's with associated GFM tubes attached thereto. A gas flush nozzle and gas flush tube and lid are positioned for inert gas input to the GFM and to the IBFP's as ambient air enters the vacuum chamber of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 8

shows the IGFS of

FIG. 1

, particularly the input point for various types of inert/active gas;





FIG. 9

shows the IGFS of

FIG. 1

using nitrogen gas delivered through feed lines, control valves and bladder bags; nitrogen gas is delivered to individual bladder bags from a gas expansion coil and accumulator connected to liquid nitrogen cylinders;





FIG. 10

shows the IGFS of

FIG. 1

using nitrogen gas delivered to a single high capacity bladder; nitrogen gas is delivered to this bladder from an expansion coil and accumulator connected to liquid nitrogen cylinders;





FIG. 11

shows the IGFS of

FIG. 1

using nitrogen in gas form delivered from cylinders directly to intermediate feed lines and to the GFM on demand;





FIG. 12

shows the IGFS of

FIG. 1

using nitrogen in gas form delivered directly from an expansion coil and gas accumulator on demand; this gas comes from liquid nitrogen cylinders attached to an expansion coil or coils; and





FIG. 13

shows a side view of the vacuum chamber of

FIG. 1

with 12 IBFP's in the chamber.












FIG. 1

shows vacuum chamber


101


connected to vacuum line


102


at the top. Vacuum line


102


leads to a vacuum pump (not shown) through valve


103


. Inside vacuum chamber


101


is platform


104


supporting a plurality of produce-filled bins, each containing a bag liner


5


. Secured to the opening at the top of each bag liner


5


is tube


4


held sealingly to liner


5


by securing tie or strap


105


. Each of tubes


4


is connected to nozzle


3


which in turn is connected to gas flush hose


7


. Each of gas flush hoses


7


is connected to manifold


2


. Manifold


2


provides the path by which air is withdrawn from each liner


5


by vacuum, and the path through which inert gas flows into liner


5


to replace withdrawn air. Manifold


2


includes main pipe


6


attached to each of the tubes


4


. Manifold


2


is also connected, in the embodiment showing in

FIG. 1

, to bladders


1


outside vacuum chamber


101


through hoses


14


and valves


15


.




Several embodiments of tube


4


appear in

FIGS. 3

,


4


, and


5


.

FIG. 3

shows side elevation and top plan views of a first embodiment of tube


4


. Tube


4


includes, near opening


111


at the bottom, a series of steam or air vents


11


. Around the exterior surface of tube


4


is tube ring


10


. Tube ring


10


, made of plastic or metal, provides a connection and holding point for attaching a liner bag


5


to tube


4


. Ring


10


prevents liner bag


5


from separating from tube


4


by forming a slip resistant point wider in diameter than tube


4


. Vent holes


11


allow air, water vapor, and other gases and liquids to flow freely from bag


5


during evacuation by vacuum, promoting fill evacuation of undesired gases from bag


5


. Each tube


4


is attached to manifold


2


and to each of the individual containers of fresh produce


5


. Flexible or rigid gas flush hose


7


connects tube


4


to manifold pipe


6


. Liner bag


5


inside the container, which may be a bin or box, is fitted and secured around tube


4


. See FIG.


7


. Tube


4


then closes, either through gravity or mechanically or otherwise, allowing inert or active gases to replace the withdrawn air and to fill each individual liner bag


5


as the vacuum imposed on the bag is released and air or other gases return to vacuum chamber


101


.




Outside vacuum chamber


101


is a plurality of large, gas-impermeable bags or bladders


1


,


106


and


107


. Each of these bladders is placed in its own enclosure


108


to minimize damage. Bags or bladders


1


are filled with a desired, predetermined concentration of inert or active gases, such as nitrogen, with the volume of gas in the bladders exceeding the volume needed to fill bag


5


after air has been withdrawn from bag


5


. Atmospheric pressure exerted on bags


1


is equal to the atmospheric pressure of outside air, if any, entering vacuum chamber


101


through vacuum release valve


15


. When inner gas flow control valve


109


is opened, atmospheric pressure is delivered to the gas flush nozzle inside vacuum chamber


101


and inside each liner bag


5


via manifold


2


. The inert or other gases in bags


1


are then transferred from these bags into liner bags


5


by atmospheric pressure as chamber


101


refills with air, or otherwise returns to ambient pressure.




This apparatus precisely controls the percentages of oxygen by volume inside liner bags


5


by varying the absolute pressure of the vacuum drawn on each of bags


5


, and the pressure at which refilling of liner bags


5


with inert or other desired gases begins. For example, an absolute pressure of 15 mm Hg yields an oxygen concentration in each liner bag of about 0.41% by volume. As another example, an absolute pressure of 36 mm Hg produces an oxygen concentration of about 1% by volume in each liner bag. By varying absolute pressure, these apparatus and methods permit the formation of oxygen concentrations in each liner bag


5


at precisely desired levels.




In preferred embodiments, the total combined circumferences of gas flush hoses


7


exceeds the circumference of vacuum release valve


109


for vacuum chamber


105


. As a result, gas from bag


1


is delivered into liner bags


5


at a rate greater than the rate at which ambient air or other gases enters chamber


105


outside liner bags


5


so that liner bags


5


are filled with desired inert or active gases, not with undesired gases.




As

FIGS. 3

,


4


and


5


show, each of tubes


4


includes a pressure equalizing reed valve


12


. Valve


12


prevents pressure differentials inside and outside liner bags


5


from damaging the produce inside bags


5


. For example, if inert or other gases fail to flow to tubes


4


as the pressure inside vacuum chamber


105


rises, valve


12


opens to permit gases to enter bag


5


, preventing damage to produce inside bag


5


.





FIGS. 4 and 5

show alternative embodiments of tube


4


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 4

, lid


8


is solenoid actuated, or is driven by an electric motor.




In the embodiment of

FIG. 5

, lid


9


is a butterfly valve that is motor driven or solenoid controlled.




As an alternative to the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, the methods and apparatus of this invention can deliver pressurized inert gas such as nitrogen directly to bags


5


. Such gases flow through manifold


2


at a rate slightly higher than the rate outside air flows into the vacuum chamber


105


through the vacuum release valve.




As another alternative to the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, the methods and apparatus of this invention can deliver pressurized inert gas such as nitrogen, pressurized active gas such as carbon dioxide, or a mixture of gases, directly to bag


5


, and to the entire vacuum chamber, without any manifold whatsoever.




Liner bags


5


may be refilled with one, or more than one gas, may be refilled with a mixture of gases, or with different gases from separate sources. For example, some fruits such as strawberries exhibit good shelf life when stored in nitrogen gas mixed with carbon dioxide gas in a low oxygen concentration modified atmosphere. The methods and apparatus of this invention permit the introduction of precisely blended inert gas mixtures with a desired oxygen concentration by volume in each bag.





FIG. 6

provides side and top views of a plurality of tubes


4


connected to pipe


6


of manifold


2


, showing that the methods and apparatus of this invention can modify the atmosphere in a plurality of liner bags of produce simultaneously, reducing costs substantially.





FIG. 7

shows, in exploded detail, one of liner bags


5


inside bin


110


.

FIG. 7

shows the connection of tube


4


to the opening at the top of liner bag


5


by means of a tie holding the opening of liner bag


5


securely to tube ring


10


.

FIG. 7

also shows the connection of tube


4


and its associate liner bag


5


to manifold


2


through gas flush hose


7


and tube


6


.





FIG. 8

shows an alternate embodiment to FIG.


1


. Here, liquid nitrogen from tanks


201


pass via line


202


to nitrogen gas accumulator


203


. From accumulator


203


nitrogen gas passes via line


204


to manifold


205


through a valve in the wall of vacuum chamber


206


. This vacuum chamber includes vacuum release valve


207


.




A detailed drawing at the lower left of

FIG. 8

shows one embodiment of a connection between nitrogen liquid container


201


and nitrogen gas accumulator


203


, including liquid gas expansion coil


208


in line


202


.





FIG. 9

shows variations of the embodiment illustrated in FIG.


1


. In

FIG. 9

, lower right, liquid nitrogen from tank


301


passes via expansion coils


302


to bladder bags


303


. From there, gas in bladder bags


303


is delivered via line


302


to vacuum chamber


304


via line


302


and valve


305


. Alternatively, liquid nitrogen can pass from tank


306


via line


307


and


308


to bladder bags


303


. Line


308


terminates in tube


309


that has a plurality of hoses


310


to deliver gas into bag


303


.





FIGS. 10

,


11


, and


12


show alternatives to the embodiment of FIG.


1


. In

FIG. 10

, liquid nitrogen passes from tank


404


via expansion coil


405


and line


406


to bag


1


. From bag


1


, inert gas passes via line


407


to vacuum chamber


408


through valve


409


.




In

FIG. 11

, nitrogen or other inert gas from tank


501


passes through line


502


to vacuum chamber


503


via valve


504


.




In

FIG. 12

, liquid nitrogen from tanks


601


passes via line


602


to inert gas expansion coils


603


and from there, via line


604


, the gas passes into vacuum chamber


605


through valve


606


. Liquid nitrogen container


603


includes, in line


602


, gas expansion coils


602


A to convert the liquid to a gas.



Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for packaging bulk fresh produce, comprising a vacuum chamber free of foam lining; support means for a plurality of bags or other containers for said produce within said vacuum chamber; a valve through the wall of said vacuum chamber for drawing a vacuum within said chamber; means for withdrawing air from said vacuum chamber and from the interior of each of said bags or other containers in said vacuum chamber, including valve means for each of said bags or other containers, each of said valve means being insertable in and removable from said bags or other containers, whereby the pressure inside said chamber and said bag become substantially the same, and means for delivering to said vacuum chamber and to the interior of each of said bags a replacement gas or mixture of gases of desired concentration and nature and at variable, controlled flow rates, while restoring the pressure inside the chamber and inside and outside each of said bags or other containers to ambient pressure at rates sufficient to minimize crushing or bruising of said produce within each of said bags and containers.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said vacuum chamber is of sufficient size and shape to receive and hold, simulaneously, a plurality or bags of other containers of said produce, said bags or containers together weighing at least about 50 pounds.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising, external to said vacuum chamber, at least one bag or bladder capable of holding sufficient active or inert gases to replace the gases inside said bags or other containers, and a connecter between said at least one bag or bladder and said means for delivering to said vacuum chamber a replacement gas or mixture of gases of desired concentration and moisture.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising means for varying the absolute pressure of the vacuum drawn on each bag or container in said vacuum chamber and for controlling the pressure at which refilling of said bags or containers with said active or inert gases takes place.
US Referenced Citations (93)
Number Name Date Kind
910882 Truesdell Jan 1909
1661602 Dary Mar 1928
2003326 Wellman Jun 1935
2170378 Orstrom Aug 1939
2214944 Vogt Sep 1940
2294668 Karas Sep 1942
2335913 Buttery Dec 1943
2424693 Jones Jul 1947
2611709 Plagge Sep 1952
2627862 Flusher Feb 1953
2815621 Carter Dec 1957
2920967 Heinemann Jan 1960
2925210 Fallert Feb 1960
2955940 Williams Oct 1960
2967777 Grindrod Jan 1961
3055568 Zalkind Sep 1962
3128934 Jacke Apr 1964
3203437 Faust Aug 1965
3204825 Underwood Sep 1965
3220157 Buchner Nov 1965
3261533 Ripking Jul 1966
3407078 Schlichter Oct 1968
3419400 Hayhurst et al. Dec 1968
3450542 Badran Jun 1969
3473589 Gotz Oct 1969
3484017 O'Donnell Dec 1969
3521806 Esty Jul 1970
3715860 Esty Feb 1973
3747614 Buedingen Jul 1973
3939287 Orwig et al. Feb 1976
3945558 Elder Mar 1976
3957179 Bamburg et al. May 1976
3990358 Cade Nov 1976
3991543 Shaw Nov 1976
4001443 Dave Jan 1977
4006561 Toma et al. Feb 1977
4039350 Bucy Aug 1977
4055931 Myers Nov 1977
4061785 Nishino et al. Dec 1977
4066401 Solomon Jan 1978
4079152 Bedrosian et al. Mar 1978
4089417 Osborne May 1978
4105153 Locke Aug 1978
4168597 Cayton Sep 1979
4209538 Woodruff Jun 1980
4224347 Woodruff Sep 1980
4241558 Gidewell et al. Dec 1980
4258848 Akao et al. Mar 1981
4268555 Kantz May 1981
4296860 Hsu et al. Oct 1981
4343429 Cherry Aug 1982
4411921 Woodruff Oct 1983
4422466 Schafer Dec 1983
4423080 Bedrosian et al. Dec 1983
4454945 Jabarin Jun 1984
4515266 Myers May 1985
4516692 Croley May 1985
4610885 Tait Sep 1986
4670227 Smith Jun 1987
4702408 Powlenko Oct 1987
4744199 Gannon May 1988
4744203 Brockwell et al. May 1988
4756417 Teixeira Jul 1988
4759642 Van Erden et al. Jul 1988
4813791 Cullen et al. Mar 1989
4840271 Garwood Jun 1989
4863287 Marisk Sep 1989
4886372 Greengrass et al. Dec 1989
4909014 Kobayashi Mar 1990
4930906 Hemphill Jun 1990
4962777 Bell Oct 1990
4963287 Hutchings et al. Oct 1990
4967776 Folmar Nov 1990
5044776 Schramer et al. Sep 1991
5078509 Center et al. Jan 1992
5093080 Keller Mar 1992
5121589 Ventura et al. Jun 1992
5226972 Bell Jul 1993
5290580 Floyd et al. Mar 1994
5316778 Hougham May 1994
5346089 Brown et al. Sep 1994
5354569 Brown et al. Oct 1994
5402906 Brown et al. Apr 1995
5421250 Beaumont Jun 1995
5437731 St. Martin Aug 1995
5522410 Meilleur Jun 1996
5640643 Hoitz et al. Jun 1997
5713101 Jackson Feb 1998
5727690 Hofmeister Mar 1998
5728439 Carlblom et al. Mar 1998
5885002 Reiss Mar 1999
5954067 Brown et al. Sep 1999
6041797 Casselman Mar 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
1025786 Feb 1978 CA
2842204 Apr 1980 DE
025334 Jan 1988 EP
402436 Dec 1933 GB
764796 Jan 1957 GB
1378140 Dec 1974 GB
60-126032 Jul 1985 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology J. Wiley & Sons, 1986 pp. 24-29, 66-81.
Packaging, Japan, Nov. 198, pp. 17-22.
Chemical Engineering, vol. 64.
Modern Packaging, Aug. 1941, pp. 44, 45.
“The King PAK” eight sided fiberboard IBC from Packaging Review, May 1980, 1 page.
The Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology (WFPT), John Wiley & Sons, 1986, p. 493.