1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to projectiles in general, and in particular to an apparatus for deploying stowed control surfaces of a projectile.
2. Description of Related Art
Control surfaces, commonly known as wings or fins, ensure that a projectile can fly along any path to which it is directed. For an unguided projectile, control surfaces keep the projectile on a straight-line flight path to an intended target. For a guided projectile, such as a heat-seeking missile, control surfaces provide the requisite maneuverability for tracking targets and help to stabilize the projectile along a flight path after maneuvers have been completed.
Control surfaces are preferably designed to be folded within the body of a projectile until the projectile has been launched from a launch platform. Folded control surfaces allow for space-efficient storage and the usage of a simple “tube-launch” system on the launch platform.
The original method of deploying folded control surfaces from within a projectile simply relies on the centripetal, force generated by rotational spinning of the projectile. In recent years, environmental seals were introduced to protect projectiles from corrosion, foreign object damage, and other environmental risks. For projectiles having environmental seals, centripetal force alone is generally not sufficient to overcome the resistance of the environmental seals for properly deploying control surfaces. Control surfaces deployment systems intended for a projectile having environmental seals must exert enough energy in order to overcome the resistance created by environmental seals surrounding the projectile as well as powerful aerodynamic or fluid-dynamic loads.
Spring-based control surfaces deployment mechanisms have been utilized to overcome the initial resistance for breaking environmental seals of a projectile. Spring-based control surfaces deployment mechanisms are effective for large diameter projectiles having thin environmental seals launched at low speeds. However, spring-based control surfaces deployment mechanisms tend to be relatively heavy and have a low-energy density, both of which are undesirable for any airborne applications. Furthermore, spring-based control surfaces deployment mechanisms are typically not effective for small diameter projectiles having more resistive environmental seals.
Consequently, it would be desirable to provide an improved deployment system capable of deploying control surfaces of a projectile.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus for deploying stowed control surfaces of a projectile includes a first and second hot gas generators, a first and second gas chambers, a piston wedge, a piston and a barrel. Initially, the first hot gas generator discharges a surge of hot gas into the first gas chamber. In response to the surge of hot gas being discharged into the first gas generator, the piston wedge displaces at least one of the control surfaces to break an environmental seal covering the projectile. After a predetermined amount of time has lapsed, the second hot gas generator discharges a surge of hot gas into the second gas chamber. The surge of hot gas displaces the piston and barrel for deploying the control surfaces completely.
All features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed written description.
The invention itself, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects, and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to
For safety reasons, the surface of projectile 10 is preferably covered and protected by an environmental seal. In order to deploy fins 17, fins 17 have to be able to break the environmental seal. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a seal-breaching element is utilized to assist fins 17 to break the environmental seal.
With reference now to
After environmental seal 25 has been broken by fins 17, centripetal force from the spinning of projectile 10 should be able to complete the deployment of fins 17. The spin rate of projectile 10 is dependent upon the launch platform of projectile 10. For example, if projectile 10 is launched from a slow moving helicopter, the spin rate of projectile 10 from the launch tends to be relatively high, and the centripetal force generated from the relatively high spin rate of projectile 10 can complete the deployment of fins 17 on their own. As another example, if projectile 10 is launched from a fast moving jet, the spin rate of projectile 10 from the launch tends to be relatively slow, and the centripetal force generated from the relatively slow spin rate of projectile 10 may not be able to complete the deployment of fins 17 on their own. Thus, in conjunction with the centripetal force, a control surface actuation element is utilized to assist fins 17 to complete their deployment.
Referring now to
Specifically, control surface interfaces 35 are located between barrel 34 and fins 17. Fins 17 are fully deployed following the rotation of control surface interfaces 35. As a result, the control surface actuation element works to supplement the centripetal force from the spinning of projectile 10 for ensuring full deployment of fins 17, as shown in
While any functional combination of placement locations is acceptable, it is contemplated that, the seal-breaching element is preferably positioned at the trailing edge or free end of folded fins 17 and the control surface actuation element is preferably positioned at the leading edge or root of folded fins 17. In an exemplary embodiment, the seal-breaching element would be activated at a user-defined time following the launch of a projectile. After the activation of the seal-breaching element, the control surface actuation element will be activated in order to ensure a complete deployment of fins 17 in the event that centripetal force alone is not sufficient to fully deploy fins 17.
It is contemplated that a variable delay ignition system may be used to dynamically determine an appropriate time delay between the activation of seal-breaching element and the activation of control surface actuation element based on various environmental and behavioral characteristics relevant to a specific projectile. However, a fixed time delay system can be also utilized.
As has been described, the present invention provides an improved apparatus for deploying control surfaces of a projectile. The hot gas based system of the present invention can effectively deploy control surfaces through environmental seals of any thickness, in any environmental condition, and for projectiles of any diameter.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 13/885,580 filed on May 15, 2013 and PCT/US2012/05161 filed Aug. 17, 2012 and claims priority to provisional application No. 61/527,756 filed on Aug. 26, 2011, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3047259 | Tatnall et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3830214 | Curtis | Aug 1974 | A |
4332360 | Topliffe | Jun 1982 | A |
4685377 | Mace et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5192037 | Moorefield | Mar 1993 | A |
6446906 | Voigt et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6672536 | Bar et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695252 | Dryer | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6880780 | Perry et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7829830 | Rogers | Nov 2010 | B1 |
8304703 | Hong et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8610042 | Sankovic | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8716640 | Baras et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8895908 | Barry et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20020117580 | Rupert et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20110186678 | Sankovic | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130206897 | Rastegar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130277494 | Rastegar et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2980842 | Apr 2013 | FR |
2012003025 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012170659 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150276359 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61527756 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13885580 | US | |
Child | 14737556 | US |