The invention relates to a sensor responsive to a dense band of signals transported over an optical transmission system.
As is well known, when a number of optical channels are propagating over an optical fiber, so-called stimulated Raman scattering (gain) may cause an optical channel to interact with a channel of a longer wavelength. Such interaction causes the power in the shorter wavelength channel to decrease and power in the longer wavelength channel to increase. In effect, the power in the shorter wavelength channels is “pumped” into the longer wavelength channels. The most pronounced effects occur when the channels are separated by about 15 THz. When an appreciable number of channels are transmitted over an optical fiber with a high level of power per channel, then the effect tilts the power divergence between the channels significantly to the channels of longer wavelengths.
The effect of Raman scattering increases when more than one band of optical channels are transported over an optical fiber, e.g., C and L bands. In that instance, the effect is approximately linear with channel separation, and may be determined by summing the contribution provided by each of the channels. If the different bands of channels are produced by different sources, then the possibility arises in which an entire band of channels may be suddenly lost or present based on whether the corresponding source has suddenly failed or come on line. This problem would be manifested by a sudden change in the spectra of the other bands, which may significantly increase the error rate of those bands. Consequently, the affected bands need to be adjusted immediately, e.g., within microseconds, to changes in average signal level and tilt.
The prior art uses an optical spectrum analyzer to generate the information needed to make the above adjustments.
However, what is needed is a sensor that quickly analyzes a band of channels to quickly detect changes in power level due to Raman scattering/pumping whenever the number of channels in another band of channels changes.
We have recognized that the effect of Raman scattering may be determined very quickly by determining the ratio between the total power and a real-time weighted total power.
More specifically, a sensor processes a group of incoming channel signals to generate a first signal, P0, that is indicative of the total power across the group channel signals, and a second signal, P1, that is indicative of the total power across the group of channels after the group of channel signals has been subjected to a predetermined weighting function. The system then offsets, as a function of the first and second signals, any Raman scattering that may be affecting the channels signals.
In the drawings:
We have recognized that, in accordance with various aspects of the invention, that the effect that an arbitrary band of channels may have on another channel due to Raman scattering may be simulated by a single channel having an effective power of PE and an effective wavelength of λE.
If all of the signal bands are within a particular bandwidth, e.g., within the range of 13 THz to 16 THz, then the Raman interaction between any two channels may be described approximately by the following relationship:
PR=γ•ILIS(λL−λS) (1)
where γ is the coefficient of the Raman Interaction, IL and IS (averaged over all polarizations) are the intensities of the longest and shortest wavelength channels, and λL and λS are the wavelengths. The effect of j channels in a single band on a single channel having a wavelength of λL may be determined by summing each such effect as follows:
Recognizing that equation (2) may be separated into two sums, then:
where the first sum is the total power in the band, P0.
Referring to
Note that the above summation is the sum of the powers in the band weighted linearly by the distance from the beginning of the band. Other than P0, the remaining terms are constants. Therefore, equation (4) may be rewritten as follows:
PR=C0P0+C1P1 (5)
where P1 is the weighted sum. The full effect of Raman pumping may then be obtained by apparatus which provides P0 and P1 directly in real time.
An illustrative optical transmission system embodying the principles of the invention is shown in simplified form in FIG. 2. The optical system, more particularly, includes head-end node 100 having, inter alia, a plurality of laser transmitters (XMTR) 110-1 through 110-n, multiplexer 115 and optical amplifier 120. Each of the transmitters generates an information bearing optical signal and supplies the signal to a respective input of multiplexer 115. The optical signals, λl through λn, so generated may constitute two different bands of optical signals/channels such that signals λl and λn would respectively have the longest and shortest wavelengths of the signals in the two different bands. Multiplexer 115 multiplexes the signals to an output extending to optical amplifier (OA), which amplifies and outputs the multiplexed signals to optical path segment 130 extending to a next downstream node. A number of downstream/intermediate nodes may be disposed along optical transmission path 130 as represented by the dashed portions of segments 130. Node 200 represents each such intermediate node. Thus, the following discussion of node 200 equally pertains to each of the other similarly arranged nodes.
Node 200, includes, inter alia, optical amplifier 210 that amplifies an optical signal received via path 130 and outputs the amplified signal via splitter 215 to other processing equipment, e.g., a demultiplexer, signal translation units, add/drop apparatus, etc., as represented by the dashed line 230 in node 200. Optical signal splitter 215 supplies a small portion of the amplified signal to sensor 220 and supplies the remainder of the amplified signal to the other equipment for further processing. Sensor 220 processes its portion of the amplified signal to determine if the signal had been tilted as a result of Raman scattering occurring along the transmission path 130. Sensor 220 supplies the results of its determination to control circuit 225, which then directs optical amplifier 235 to tilt the signal that it receives at its input in an opposite direction to offset the effect of the Raman scattering, if needed.
Sensor 220, shown in more detail in
In accordance an aspect of the invention, the values of resistors R1 and R2 are calibrated for a given installation at the factory using a signal comprising all of the intended signals in the band, e.g., the L band, and then using just half of those signals. More specifically, the calibration maybe done using wavelengths of λmax and λmin. For λmax, P0 is set to equal P1, and for λmin, P1 is set to 0. To determine the effective power, PE, and wavelength, λE, PE=P0 and λE=λmin+ΔλBP1/P0.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, a variable loss device in combination with a reflector may be used in place of variable reflection filter (VRF) 35, as shown in FIG. 4. Specifically, the amount of loss inserted in each path of the demultiplexed signals is proportional to the wavelength of the signal. That is, the most loss is inserted in the path of the signal having the shortest wavelength and most loss is inserted in the path of the signal having the longest wavelength. The signals are then reflected/returned to Dragone section 32-2 by an optical reflector as shown. In this way the signals are weighted according to the amount of loss that they encounter on their way to the reflector and on their return to Dragone section 32-2.
(Note that for a Dragone router having a sufficiently large free-spectral range (FSR), the intensities in section 32-2 are uniform across all channels. Also note, that for a smaller FSR, the intensities may be approximated by a Gaussian function. As such, a Dragone router having a large FSR is preferable over a Dragone router having a smaller FSR. However, if a router of the latter type is used, then R(λ) will need to include the Gaussian Shaping factor.
Further note, that other wavelength dependent effects may be handled using other R(λ) functions in the reflector. For example, a polarization dependent sensor may be implemented by placing a polarization splitter between filter 10 and splitter 15 (
It will thus be appreciated that, although the invention illustrated herein is described in the context of a specific illustrative embodiment, those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous alternative arrangements which, although, not explicitly shown or described herein, nevertheless, embody the principles of the invention and are within its spirit and scope. For example, the inventive sensor may be used to deal with transmission impairments other than Raman scattering.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5374973 | Maxham et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5444528 | Puschell | Aug 1995 | A |
5467218 | Takeda et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5703711 | Hamada | Dec 1997 | A |
5818629 | Kinoshita | Oct 1998 | A |
5861980 | Ono | Jan 1999 | A |
5870217 | Itou et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5909305 | Kinoshita | Jun 1999 | A |
6072614 | Roberts | Jun 2000 | A |
6088152 | Berger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6141467 | Doerr | Oct 2000 | A |
6222962 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6292288 | Akasaka et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6359726 | Onaka et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |