Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6304182
-
Patent Number
6,304,182
-
Date Filed
Thursday, December 24, 199826 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, October 16, 200123 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
- Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C.
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 340 5721
- 340 570
- 340 569
- 340 571
- 340 5722
- 340 5724
- 340 5725
- 340 5726
- 340 5727
- 340 5728
- 340 5681
- 340 5686
- 340 5687
- 340 5688
- 340 5456
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A burglar detection apparatus has a tag 11 that includes a resonance circuit. The tag is preferably contained with an object 15 whose theft is desired to be detected. The tagged object may be placed in a drawer 14 which is contained in a box 13. A tag detection sensor 16 is installed in the box and detects whether the tag 11 is present in the drawer 14. Also, a drawer sensor 17 detects whether the drawer is opened. Based on respective detection outputs of the tag detection sensor 16 and the drawer sensor 17, a control circuit 19 controls an alarm 18. Advantageously, the apparatus can be installed in a comparatively small space, does not malfunction even if subjected to large amounts of electrical noise, and reliably detects the presence or absence of a tag even if the tag is located near a metal object.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to an apparatus detecting a burglar by detecting with using an radio wave whether a tag having a resonance circuit block is in a predetermined location and the like.
BACKGROUND ART
Heretofore, a tag is disclosed in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 8-185584, the tag which is constructed such that a resonance circuit block of the tag attached to an object for monitoring a burglar resonates with a specific frequency from a radio wave transmission unit, separation detection means detects whether the tag is separated from the object for monitoring a burglar, and a separation information block controls warning sound output means on the basis of a detection output of this separation detection means. In this burglar-alarm tag, the resonance circuit block is constructed with forming conductive metal foil, having a predetermined shape, by etching and the like in both sides of a thin film of an insulating dielectric. For example, a coil portion formed in a spiral shape with conductive metal foil, and a surface-side planer pattern of a capacitor, connected to the coil portion, in the central portion of the spiral of this coil portion are formed on the surface of the thin film.
In an entrance of an outlet selling the object for monitoring a burglar, a transmission antenna and a reception antenna are installed in a predetermined interval, and these antennas are electrically connected to a control block. The control block is constructed such that the control block makes the transmission antenna transmit a radio wave having a frequency resonating in the resonance circuit block and always checks a signal level of a signal received from the reception antenna. Furthermore, a speaker sounding an alarm is connected to a control output terminal of the control block.
With using a burglar-alarm tag constructed in this manner, a radio wave transmitted from a transmission antenna resonates in a resonance circuit block of the tag attached to an object for monitoring a burglar if an object for monitoring a burglar passes between the transmission antenna and a reception antenna without payment. Hence, the reception antenna receives an input signal whose reception level is modulated. In consequence, the control block sounds an alarm from a speaker and can check takeout of an unpaid product. In regard to a paid-up product, a tag is disabled by breaking a capacitor through applying a strong radio wave, or an alarm is disabled by temporarily stopping the alarm speaker.
Nevertheless, the above burglar-alarm tag requires a transmission antenna and a reception antenna, which are comparatively large, so as to detect a burglar of a product with the tag. Therefore, this type of tag has a defect that a comparatively wide space is required as an installation space of these antennas.
In addition, the above burglar-alarm tag has a possibility of a malfunction in a location with plenty of electrical noise of a computer and the like.
Furthermore, in regard to the above burglar-alarm tag, a central line of the helical coil portion extends in the direction orthogonal to a mounting surface of an object, and hence a radio wave transmitted from the resonance circuit block passes the object. Therefore, if this tag is attached on an object whose surface is made of conductive material such as aluminum or ferromagnetic material such as a steel sheet, self inductance of the coil portion changes. Hence, in comparison with a case that the tag is attached to an object whose surface is made of insulating-material or non-magnetic material, the tag has a possibility of not operating as a burglar-alarm tag due to an influence of a change of a resonance frequency in the resonance circuit block and the like.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus that can be installed in a comparatively small space, can prevent a malfunction even if the apparatus is installed in a location with plenty of electrical noise, and can surely detect the presence and absence of a tag even if the tag is placed in the vicinity of an object made of metal.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus that can increase a ratio (SIN ratio) between a signal transmitted by the tag detection sensor and a signal generated by electrical noise of a computer and the like by making a radio wave, which is transmitted by the tag detection sensor, have directivity.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus that can immediately detect abnormal operation caused by a failure and the like of a tag, a tag detection sensor, a drawer sensor, or an upper lid sensor, and hence can increase the reliability of the apparatus.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIGS. 1 and 3
is a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus comprising: a tag
11
that has a resonance circuit block
12
and is placed with an object
15
in a predetermined location; a tag detection sensor
16
that is installed in the vicinity of the tag
11
placed in the predetermined location and detects whether the tag
11
is present in the predetermined location; and a control circuit
19
controlling alarm means
18
on the basis of an detection output of the tag detection sensor
16
.
Since the tag detection sensor
16
detects that the tag
11
is present in the predetermined location if the tag
11
is placed in the predetermined location with the object
15
, the control circuit
19
does not activate the alarm means
18
. In addition, if the tag
11
is taken out from the predetermined location with the object
15
, the tag detection sensor
16
detects that the tag
11
is not present in the predetermined location, and hence the control circuit
19
activates the alarm means
18
.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIGS. 1 and 3
is a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus comprising: a tag
11
having a resonance circuit block
12
; a box
13
containing a drawer
14
where the tag
11
is contained with an object
15
; a tag detection sensor
16
that is installed in the box
13
and detects whether the tag
11
is present within the drawer
14
; a drawer sensor
17
detecting whether the drawer
14
is drawn; and a control circuit
19
controlling alarm means
18
on the basis of each detection output of the tag detection sensor
16
and drawer sensor
17
.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, since the drawer sensor
17
detects that the drawer
14
is not drawn if the drawer
14
is contained in the box
13
, the control circuit
19
does not activate the alarm means
18
regardless of whether the tag
11
is present within the drawer
14
or not. In addition, if the drawer
14
is drawn from the box
13
, the drawer sensor
17
detects that the drawer
14
is drawn, and at the same time, the tag detection sensor
16
detects that the tag
11
is present within the drawer
14
. Therefore, the control circuit
19
does not activate the alarm means
18
. Furthermore, if the tag
11
is taken out with the object
15
from the drawer
14
with drawing the drawer
14
, the tag detection sensor
16
detects that the tag
11
is not present within the drawer
14
. Therefore, the control circuit
19
activates the alarm means
18
.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 7
is a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus comprising: a tag
11
having a resonance circuit block; a box
63
that contains the tag
11
with an object
15
and has an upper lid
63
b
that can be opened and closed; a tag detection sensor
66
that is installed in the box
63
and detects whether the tag
11
is present within the box
63
; an upper lid sensor
67
detecting whether the upper lid
63
b
is opened or closed; and a control circuit
19
controlling alarm means
18
on the basis of each detection output of the tag detection sensor
66
and upper lid sensor
67
.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, since the upper lid sensor
67
detects that the upper lid
63
b
is not opened if the upper lid
63
b
is closed, the control circuit
19
does not activate the alarm means
18
regardless of whether the tag
11
is present within the box
63
or not. In addition, if the upper lid
63
b
is opened, the upper lid sensor
67
detects that the upper lid
63
b
is opened, and the tag detection sensor
66
detects that the tag
11
is present within the box
63
. Therefore, the control circuit
19
does not activate the alarm means
18
. Furthermore, if the tag
11
is taken out with the object
15
from the box
63
with opening the upper lid
63
b
, the tag detection sensor
66
detects that the tag
11
is not present within the box
63
. Therefore, the control circuit
19
activates the alarm means
18
.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 1
is characterized in that a tag
11
is placed in one piece with an object
15
in a predetermined location.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, if the object
15
is taken out from the predetermined location, the tag
11
also is taken out from the predetermined location surely, and hence a burglar of the object
15
can be surely detected.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 1
or
7
is characterized in that a tag
11
is contained in one piece with an object
15
in a drawer
14
or box
63
.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, if the object
15
is taken out from the drawer
14
or box
63
, the tag
11
also is taken out from the drawer
14
or box
63
surely, and hence a burglar of the object
15
can be surely detected.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIGS. 1 and 3
or
7
is characterized in that a drawer
14
or a box
63
is made of metal material, and a soft magnetic member
22
or
72
is sandwiched between a tag
11
and the drawer
14
or box
63
.
This embodiment of the invention is characterized in that a soft magnetic member is made of a sintered ferrite, a compact of ferrite powder and binder, or composite material of soft magnetic metal powder.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, a magnetic field can easily pass to a resonance circuit block
12
of a tag
11
owing to the soft magnetic member
22
or
72
. Hence, even if a drawing
14
or a box
63
is made of metal material, the tag
11
can be surely detected by a tag detection sensor
16
or
66
.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 1
is characterized in that a tag detection sensor
16
has a core
23
a
, where a coil
23
b
is wound, and at least a part of the core
23
a
, which does not face to a tag
11
, is covered with the coil
23
b
by either or both of a wave absorber
26
and an electromagnetic wave shielding member.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, even if the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention is installed in a location with plenty of electrical noise of a computer and the like, the electrical noise is absorbed by the wave absorber
26
and is cut off by the electromagnetic wave shielding member. Therefore, injection of the electrical noise into the core
23
a
of the tag detection sensor
16
is blocked, and hence it is possible to prevent the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention from malfunctioning.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 7
is characterized in that a tag detection sensor
66
has a loop antenna
73
, and a surface of the loop antenna
73
, which does not face to a tag
11
, is covered by either or both of a wave absorber
76
and an electromagnetic wave shielding member.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, even if the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention is installed in a location with plenty of electrical noise of a computer and the like, the electrical noise is absorbed by the wave absorber
26
and is cut off by the electromagnetic wave shielding member. Therefore, injection of the electrical noise into the loop antenna
73
of the tag detection sensor
66
is blocked, and hence it is possible to prevent the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention from malfunctioning.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 1
is characterized in that a pair of arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
made of ferrite is provided at both ends of the core
23
a
with protruding toward a tag
11
.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, a radio wave transmitted from the pair of arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
proceeds toward the tag
11
, that is, it is possible to make the radio wave have directivity. Therefore, it is possible to increase a ratio (S/N ratio) between a signal transmitted by the arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
and a signal generated by electrical noise of a computer and the like.
The embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 9
or
10
comprises a self operation management circuit
81
or
91
detecting abnormal operation of a tag
11
, a tag detection sensor
16
or
66
, or a drawer sensor
17
.
In this radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, if the tag
11
, tag detection sensor
16
or
66
, or drawer sensor
17
abnormally operates due to a failure and the like, the self operation management circuit
81
or
91
are immediately detect the abnormal operation. Therefore, it is possible to rapidly repair or replace the tag
11
or the like which abnormally operates.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is a block diagram showing a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus according to a first embodiment present invention;
FIG. 2A
is a vertical cross-sectional view of a safe in a state of a drawer being contained in the safe;
FIG. 2B
is a vertical cross-sectional view of a safe in a state of the drawer being drawn from the safe;
FIG. 3
is an exploded perspective view of a tag in the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus;
FIG. 4
is a vertical cross-sectional view of the tag;
FIG. 5
is a block diagram of a tag detection circuit thereof;
FIG. 6
is a block diagram that shows a second embodiment of the present invention and corresponds to
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 7
is a block diagram that shows a third embodiment of the present invention and corresponds to
FIG. 1
;
FIG. 8A
is a vertical cross-sectional view of a safe in a state of an upper lid being closed;
FIG. 8B
is a vertical cross-sectional view of a safe in a state of an upper lid being opened;
FIG. 9
is a block diagram that corresponds to FIG.
1
and shows a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus that comprises a self operation management circuit and is a fourth embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 10
is a block diagram that corresponds to FIG.
7
and shows a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus that comprises a self operation management circuit and is a fifth embodiment of the present invention.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Next, a form of a first embodiment of the present invention will be described on the basis of drawings. A radio wave type burglar detection apparatus, as shown in
FIGS. 1 and 3
, comprises: a tag
11
having a resonance circuit block
12
; a box
13
containing a drawer
14
where the tag
11
is contained with an object
15
; a tag detection sensor
16
detecting whether the tag
11
is present within the drawer
14
; a drawer sensor
17
detecting whether the drawer
14
is drawn; and a control circuit
19
controlling alarm means
18
on the basis of each detection output of the tag detection sensor
16
and drawer sensor
17
. The tag
11
is formed in the approximately same shape as that of the object
15
in this embodiment. This tag
11
, as shown in
FIGS. 3 and 4
, comprises: a base plate
11
a
made of insulating-material such as paper and a plastic thin sheet; a coil portion
11
b
that is made of conductive material such as copper and aluminum and is formed in a helical and approximately rectangular shape on the upper surface of this base plate
11
a
; a dielectric layer
11
c
that is made of insulating-material and is bonded to cover the upper surface of the base plate
11
a
through the coil portion
11
b
; and a surface layer
11
d
that is made of insulating-material and is bonded to cover the upper surface of the dielectric layer
11
c.
On the upper surface of the base plate
11
a
, a first electrode layer lie and a first connecting terminal
11
f
that are made of conductive material and are electrically connected to an internal end and an external end of the coil portion
11
b
are bonded respectively. The dielectric layer
11
c
is bonded to cover a part of the upper surface of the base plate
11
a
except the first connecting terminal
11
f
. In addition, on the bottom surface of the surface layer
11
d
, a second electrode layer
11
g
and a second connecting terminal
11
h
that are made of conductive material and face to the first electrode layer
11
e
and first connecting terminal
11
f
are bonded respectively. The second electrode layer
11
g
and second connecting terminal
11
h
are electrically connected with each other. The first and second connecting terminals
11
f
and
11
h
are electrically connected with each other when the surface layer
11
d
is laminated through the dielectric layer
11
c
on the base plate
11
a
. In addition, a capacitor
11
i
is constructed with the first electrode layer
11
e
, first dielectric layer
11
c
, and second electrode layer
11
g
, and a resonance circuit block
12
is constructed with this capacitor
11
i
and coil portion
11
b
. A resonance frequency of the resonance circuit block
12
is 7-9 MHz in this embodiment.
The box
13
is a safe where the drawer
14
is contained, and the object
15
is plenty of bank notes (FIGS.
1
and
2
). The drawer
14
is partitioned into a document container
14
c
, which is in a near end, and bank note containers
14
d
and
14
e
, which are in a back end, with a first partition board
14
a
extending in the width direction. The bank note containers
14
d
and
14
e
are partitioned into a pair of bank note containers
14
d
and
14
e
, which are partitioned into a left part and a right part respectively, with a second partition board extending in the drawing direction. This drawer
14
is made of metal material such as a steel sheet, the tags
11
and
11
are contained in the pair of bank note containers
14
d
and
14
e
respectively, and further, on these tags
11
and
11
, plenty of bank notes
15
and
15
are piled respectively. In addition, soft magnetic members
22
and
22
are sandwiched between the tags
11
and
11
, and the drawer
14
.
It is preferable to use a sintered ferrite, a compact of ferrite powder and binder, or composite material of soft magnetic metal powder as this soft magnetic member. As the binder, polyester, nylon, polyvinyl chloride, synthetic rubber, natural rubber, and the like can be used. In addition, as the composite material of soft magnetic metal powder, composite material of carbonyl iron powder, permalloy powder by ball mill crushing, and the like, and resin such as polyester, nylon, polyvinyl chloride, synthetic rubber, and natural rubber can be used. The purpose of inserting the soft magnetic member
22
between the tag
11
and drawer
14
is to make it possible that a magnetic field easily passes to the resonance circuit block of the tag
11
owing to the soft magnetic member
22
, and hence, that the tag
11
is surely detected by the tag detection sensor
16
even if the drawer
14
is made of metal. In addition, an opening
13
a
for drawing the drawer
14
is formed in the front panel of the safe
13
, and this opening
13
a
is enabled to open and close by means of a front door
13
b
(FIGS.
2
A and
2
B).
The tag detection sensor
16
comprises an antenna
23
attached on a back surface of an upper wall in the vicinity of the opening
13
a
of the safe
13
, and a tag detection circuit
24
electrically connected to a coil
23
b
of this antenna
23
(
FIGS. 1
,
2
A,
2
B, and
5
). The antenna
23
has a core
23
a
that is made of ferrite and extends in the width direction of the safe
13
, a coil
23
b
wound around this core
23
a
, and a pair of arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
, which is made of ferrite and is provided in both ends of the core
23
a
with protruding toward two tags
11
and
11
respectively. The core
23
a
, including the coil
23
b
, and a base end of the pair of arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
are covered with the wave absorber
26
(
FIGS. 1 and 5
) and electromagnetic wave shielding member (not shown) through an insulator (not shown) such as a vinyl tape. In addition, if the pair of arm sections is not provided in both ends of the core with protruding, the periphery of a part of a core except a part of the core facing to the tag, that is, both ends of the core can be covered with the coil through the insulator with the wave absorber and electromagnetic wave shielding member. In addition, regardless of the presence or absence of the pair of arm sections, a part of the core not facing to the tag can be covered with the coil through the insulator with the wave absorber and electromagnetic wave shielding member.
The wave absorber
26
is a nonwoven fabric type wave absorber, and a wave absorber is used, the wave absorber which is a wave absorber comprising a nonwoven fabric composed of first fibers which are covered by oxidized metal and second fibers that is an insulator and is not covered by metal. In addition, a wave absorber composed of laminated nonwoven fabric sheets composed of the first fibers and second fibers is used. Furthermore, a wave absorber comprising a nonwoven fabric composed of a plurality of laminated layers composed of at least one layer of nonwoven fabric containing oxidized metal-coated fibers and one layer of nonwoven fabric containing non-oxidized metal-coated fibers is also used, the nonwoven fabric having a layer containing the oxidized metal-coated fibers which is located in the injection surface side of a radio wave. As metal coating the fibers and being oxidized, one or two kinds of metal, alloys, or the like that are selected from a group of silver, copper, nickel, and zinc are used.
In addition, as the wave absorber
26
, a wave absorber comprising a nonwoven fabric composed of first fibers, which is coated with metal that is sulfided, and second fibers, which is an insulator and is not coated with metal, can be used. Furthermore, a wave absorber comprising a plurality of laminated nonwoven fabric sheets composed of the first and second fibers can be also used. Moreover, a wave absorber comprising a nonwoven fabric composed of a plurality of laminated layers composed of at least one layer of nonwoven fabric containing sulfided metal-coated fibers and one layer of nonwoven fabric containing non-sulfided metal-coated fibers can be also used, the nonwoven fabric having a layer containing the sulfided metal-coated fibers which is located in the injection surface side of a radio wave. As metal coating the fibers and being sulfided, copper or a copper alloy is used.
In addition, it is preferable to use as an electromagnetic wave shielding member a nonwoven fabric comprising organic fibers coated with silver, a nonwoven fabric comprising a mixture of organic fibers and organic fibers coated with silver, or a laminated body comprising nonwoven fabrics comprising organic fibers and organic fibers coated with silver. Natural and synthetic organic fibers such as cotton, linen, regenerated cellulose, polyamide, acrylic fibers, polyolefine, polyester, and the like are used as the organic fibers. The purpose of coating the core
23
a
, including the coil
23
b
, and the pair of arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
with the wave absorber
26
and electromagnetic wave shielding member is to make it possible that electrical noise of a computer and the like is absorbed by the wave absorber
26
and is blocked from incidence into the core
23
a
of the antenna
23
by shutting off with the electromagnetic wave shielding member, and hence that a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus is prevented from malfunctioning. In addition, the purpose of providing the pair of arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
in both sides of the core
23
a
with protruding is to increase a ratio (S/N ratio) between a signal transmitted from the arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
and a signal generated by electrical noise of a computer and the like by a radio wave, transmitted from the pair of arm sections
23
c
and
23
d
, proceeding toward the tags
11
and
11
, that is, making the radio wave have directivity.
The tag detection circuit
24
, as shown in
FIG. 5
, comprises: a voltage-controlled oscillator
24
a
that is electrically connected to the coil
23
b
of the antenna
23
and feeds a current, having the same frequency as a resonance frequency of the tag
11
, through the coil
23
b
; a sweep block
24
b
sweeping the oscillating frequency of this oscillator
24
a
within the range of 7-9 MHz; an amplifier
24
c
whose input terminal is connected to the output terminal of an automatic gain controller in the voltage-controlled oscillator
24
a
; a noise filter
24
d
whose input terminal is connected to the output terminal of the amplifier
24
c
; and a threshold circuit
24
e
whose input terminal is connected to the output of the noise filter
24
d
. This tag detection circuit
24
is constructed so that, when the resonance circuit block
12
resonates by the tag
11
accessing the coil
23
b
, a specific signal may appear at the output terminal of the automatic gain controller of the voltage-controlled oscillator
24
a
. This specific signal is amplified by the amplifier
24
c
, a noise signal mixed in this signal is filtered by the noise filter
24
d
, and further the signal is selected by the threshold circuit
24
e
. If a waveform of the specific signal is not present in a waveform selected by the threshold circuit
24
e
, the threshold circuit
24
e
outputs the ON signal “1”. In addition, if a waveform of the specific signal is present in a waveform selected by the threshold circuit
24
e
, the threshold circuit
24
e
outputs the OFF signal “0”.
The drawer sensor
17
is a reed switch (
FIGS. 1 and 2
) attached to one internal surface of a side wall in the vicinity of the opening
13
a
of the safe
13
. In addition, a magnet
27
is attached to an external surface of a side wall in the vicinity of the back end of the drawer
14
. If the drawer
14
is contained in the safe
13
, the magnet
27
is separated from the reed switch
17
, and hence the reed switch outputs the signal “0” with keeping the OFF state. If the drawer
14
is drawn, the magnet
27
accesses the reed switch
17
, and hence the reed switch outputs the signal “1” with turning on. One terminal of this reed switch
17
is connected to a power supply
28
, and another terminal is connected to a control input terminal of an AND circuit
19
, which is a control circuit, with the output terminal of the threshold circuit
24
e
(FIGS.
1
and
5
). A first buzzer
18
, which is alarm means, is connected to the control output terminal of the AND circuit
19
(FIG.
1
). The AND circuit
19
activates the first buzzer
18
only when the reed switch
17
outputs the signal “1” because of the drawer
17
being drawn and the threshold circuit
24
e
outputs the signal “1” because of the tag
11
not being present within the drawer
14
.
A time constant circuit
29
, which is composed of a resistor
29
a
and a capacitor
29
b
, is connected between the AND circuit
19
and first buzzer
18
. When chattering at the output terminal of the threshold circuit
24
e
and the reed switch
17
arises, the time constant circuit
29
prevents the first buzzer
18
from malfunctioning. In particular, this is effective to a case that chattering arises at the output terminal of the threshold circuit
24
e
due to electrical noise that is caused by a cellular phone and the like and is not continuous but intermittent. The tag detection circuit
24
, power supply
28
, AND circuit
19
, first buzzer
18
, and time constant circuit
29
are contained in a case
31
attached to the external surface of a side wall of the safe
13
(FIGS.
1
and
2
).
Operation of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus constructed like this will be described.
If the drawer
14
is contained in the safe
13
and the front door
13
b
is closed (FIG.
2
A), the magnet
27
is separated from the reed switch
17
, and hence the reed switch
17
outputs the signal “0” with keeping the OFF state. Therefore, even if an ON signal “1” is outputted from the threshold circuit
24
e
because the tag detection sensor
16
cannot detect the tags
11
and
11
due to the tags
11
and
11
not facing to the antenna
23
, the AND circuit
19
does not activate the first buzzer
18
on the basis of respective detection outputs of the reed switch
17
and tag detection sensor
16
.
If the front door
13
b
of the safe
13
is opened and the drawer
14
is drawn in a state of being able to take the bank notes
15
out (FIG.
2
B), the magnet
27
accesses the reed switch
17
, and hence the reed switch
17
outputs the signal “1” owing to the magnetic intensity of the magnet
27
(FIG.
1
). Nevertheless, since the tag
11
faces to the antenna
23
, the tag detection sensor
16
detects the two tags
11
and
11
, and hence the threshold circuit
24
e
outputs the signal “0”. In consequence, the AND circuit
19
does not activate the first buzzer
18
on the basis of respective detection outputs of the reed switch
17
and tag detection sensor
16
.
In addition, even if one of the two tags
11
and
11
is taken out from the drawer with the bank notes
15
, the tag detection sensor
16
continues to detect another residual tag
11
, and hence the threshold circuit
24
e
continues to output the signal “0”. In consequence, the AND circuit
19
does not activate the first buzzer
18
on the basis of respective detection outputs of the reed switch
17
and tag detection sensor
16
. This is because it is considered that an owner of the safe
13
counts the bank notes
15
in the safe
13
.
Furthermore, if all of the tags
11
and
11
are taken out with the bank notes
15
and
15
from the drawer
14
in the state of the reed switch
17
outputting the signal “1”, the tag detection sensor
16
detects that the tags
11
and
11
are not present in the drawer
14
, and hence the threshold circuit
24
e
outputs the signal “1”. In consequence, the AND circuit
19
activates the first buzzer
18
on the basis of respective detection outputs of the reed switch
17
and tag detection sensor
16
. Therefore, an owner of the safe
13
can immediately know that the bank notes
15
in the safe
13
are taken out without notice by an alarm sounded by the first buzzer
18
, and hence can instantly report the incident to the police.
FIG. 6
shows a second embodiment of the present invention. In
FIG. 6
, the same symbols are assigned to the same components as those in FIG.
1
.
In this embodiment, the power supply
28
is connected in series to the tag detection circuit
24
through the reed switch
17
, and this series circuit constructs a control circuit
49
. Except the above construction this embodiment has the same construction as the first embodiment has.
Since the operation of a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus constructed like this is the approximately same as the operation of the first embodiment, repeated description will be omitted.
FIGS. 7 and 8
show a third embodiment of the present invention. In
FIGS. 7 and 8
, the same symbols are assigned to the same components as those in
FIGS. 1 and 2
.
In this embodiment, an opening
63
a
is provided in the upper side of the safe
63
made of metal material, and an upper lid
63
b
that can open and close the opening
63
a
is installed in the upper surface of this safe
63
. Furthermore, a loop antenna
73
that is circular or square and consists of a plurality of turns of wire is used as an antenna of a tag detection sensor
66
. In the safe
63
, a soft magnetic member
72
made of the same material as that of the soft magnetic member
22
in the first embodiment is placed, and two tags
11
and
11
are placed in parallel to each other on this soft magnetic member
72
. Thus, the soft magnetic member
72
is sandwiched between the tags
11
and
11
, and the safe
63
. In addition, on these tags
11
and
11
, plenty of bank notes
15
and
15
are piled respectively. The loop antenna
73
is placed to become above between the two tags
11
and
11
in the safe
63
, and both ends of this antenna
73
are electrically connected to the tag detection circuit
24
. In addition, the surface of the loop antenna
73
not facing to the tags
11
and
11
is covered by a wave absorber
76
and an electromagnetic wave shielding member (not shown) through an insulator (not shown).
In addition, an upper lid sensor
67
is mounted to the inside of a side wall in the vicinity of the opening
63
a
of the safe
63
. This sensor
67
is a micro switch, which outputs the signal “0” with turning off at the time of closing the upper lid
63
b
, and which outputs the signal “1” with turning on at the time of opening the upper lid
63
b
. The AND circuit
19
, which is a control circuit, activates the first buzzer
18
only when the micro switch
67
outputs the signal “1” because of the upper lid
63
b
being opened and a threshold circuit (not shown) in the tag detection circuit
24
outputs an ON signal “1” because of the tag
11
not being present within the safe
63
. The tag detection circuit
24
, power supply
28
, AND circuit
19
, first buzzer
18
, and time constant circuit
29
are contained in a case
81
mounted to the external surface of a back wall of the safe
63
. The construction of this embodiment except the above construction is the same as that of the first embodiment.
In the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus constructed like this, if the upper lid
63
b
is closed (FIG.
8
A), the tag detection sensor
66
detects that the tags
11
and
11
are present in the safe
63
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the signal “0”. Since the micro switch
67
outputs the signal “0”, the AND circuit
19
does not activate the first buzzer
18
. In addition, if the upper lid
63
b
is opened (FIG.
8
B), the micro switch
67
outputs the signal “1” (FIG.
1
), but the tag detection sensor
66
detects that the tags
11
and
11
are present in the safe
63
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the signal “0”. In consequence, the AND circuit
19
does not activate the first buzzer
18
.
In addition, even if one of the two tags
11
and
11
is taken out from the safe
63
with the bank notes
15
, the tag detection sensor
66
continues to detect another residual tag
11
in the safe
63
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
continues to output the signal “0”. In consequence, the AND circuit
19
does not activate the first buzzer
18
. Furthermore, if all of the tags
11
and
11
are taken out with the bank notes
15
and
15
from the safe
63
in the state of the upper lid being opened (the micro switch
67
outputting the signal “1”), the tag detection sensor
66
detects that the tags
11
and
11
are not present in the safe
63
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the signal “1”. Hence, the AND circuit
19
activates the first buzzer
18
. In consequence, an owner of the safe
63
can immediately know that the bank notes
15
in the safe
63
are taken out without notice by an alarm sounded by the first buzzer
18
, and hence can instantly report the incident to the police.
FIG. 9
shows a fourth embodiment of the present invention. In
FIG. 9
, the same symbols are assigned to the same components as those in FIG.
1
.
This embodiment comprises a self operation management circuit
81
detecting abnormal operation of the tag
11
, tag detection sensor
16
or reed switch
17
. This self operation management circuit
81
has an exclusive OR circuit
82
and an inverting circuit
83
. A first input terminal
82
a
out of two input terminals
82
a
and
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
is connected to the output side of the tag detection circuit
24
, and a second input terminal
82
b
is connected to the ground side of the reed switch
17
respectively. The inverting circuit
83
is connected between the first input terminal
82
a
and tag detection circuit
24
. In addition, the output terminal
82
c
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
is connected to a second buzzer
86
, which is information means, through a time constant circuit
84
.
If ON signals “1” or OFF signals “0” are inputted to all of the first and second input terminals
82
a
and
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
, the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “0”. If the signal “0” is inputted to either of the first or second input terminal
82
a
or
82
b
and the signal “1” is inputted to the other terminal, the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “1”. Thus, the exclusive OR cuircuit
82
has the input and output relation shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
|
|
1st Input
2nd Input
Output
|
|
0
0
0
|
0
1
1
|
1
0
1
|
1
1
0
|
|
If the signal “0” is inputted, the inverting circuit
83
outputs the signal “1”, and if the signal “1” is imputed, the inverting circuit
83
outputs the signal “
0
”. In addition, the second buzzer
86
is constructed to have a tone different than that of the first buzzer
18
that is the alarm means. The buzzer
86
is not activated if the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “0”, and is activated if outputting the signal “1”. In addition, as information means, a lamp and the like can be used instead of the buzzer. Furthermore, the time constant circuit
84
consists of a resistor
84
a
and a capacitor
84
b
, and absorbs a time lag between the tag detection circuit
24
and reed switch
17
. Thus, even if the outputs of the tag detection circuit
24
and reed switch
17
instantly become unstable due to the time lag at the time of drawing or containing the drawer
14
and hence the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “1” in an instant, the second buzzer
86
is not activated owing to the time constant circuit
84
. In addition, the time constant circuit
84
has a function of preventing the second buzzer
86
from being activated when external noise that is intermittent is received. The construction except the above construction is the same as that of the first embodiment.
The operation of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus constructed like this will be described.
[A] A Case that All of the Tag
11
, Tag Detection Sensor
16
, and Reed Switch
17
Normally Operate
Since the tag
11
does not face to the antenna
23
if the drawer
14
is contained in the safe
13
, the tag detection sensor
16
cannot detect the tag
11
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the ON signal “1”. This ON signal “1” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted by the inverting circuit
83
and is outputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, the reed switch
17
is turned off because the reed switch
17
is separated from the magnet
27
, and hence the OFF signal “0” is outputted to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “0” to the second buzzer
86
, and hence the second buzzer
86
is not activated. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “
0
” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “0”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
In addition, if the drawer
14
is drawn from the safe
13
, the tag
11
faces to the antenna
23
, the tag detection sensor
16
detects the tag
11
, and the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the OFF signal “0”. This output “0” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted by the inverting circuit
83
into the signal “1” to be outputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, since the reed switch
17
is turned on because the magnet
27
accesses the reed switch
17
, the ON signal “1” is outputted to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, since the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “0” to the second buzzer
86
, the second buzzer
86
is not activated. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “0” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
Furthermore, if the two tags
11
and
11
are taken out from the drawer
14
in the state of the drawer
14
being drawn from the safe
13
, the tag detection sensor
16
does not detect the tag
11
because the tag
11
does not face to the antenna
23
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the ON signal “1”. This output “1” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted into the signal “0” by the inverting circuit
83
to be outputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, since the reed switch
17
keeps the state of accessing the magnet
27
, the reed switch
17
outputs the ON signal “1” to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, since the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “
1
” to the second buzzer
86
, the second buzzer
86
is activated in a tone different from that of the first buzzer
18
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “1” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is activated. Thus, if the bank notes
15
in the safe
13
are taken out without notice, not only the first buzzer
18
but also the second buzzer is activated. Nevertheless, since the tag
11
is taken out with the bank notes
15
from the drawer
14
, it is possible to judge that the bank notes
15
are taken out without notice.
[B] A Case that the Tag Detection Sensor
16
Abnormally Operates Due to a Failure
A tag detection sensor
16
abnormally operates due to abnormal oscillation of a voltage-controlled oscillator (not shown), abnormal operation of an amplifier (not shown), or a failure or disconnection of a wire of another part constructing the tag detection sensor
16
. Therefore, in spite of the tag
11
not facing to the antenna
23
, the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the OFF signal “0” as if the tag detection sensor
16
detected the tag
11
. This output “0” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted into the signal “1” by the inverting circuit
83
to be inputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, since the normal reed switch
17
is turned off because the reed switch
17
is separated from the magnet
27
, the reed switch
17
outputs the signal “0” to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, since the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “1” to the second buzzer
86
, the second buzzer
86
is activated in a tone different from that of the first buzzer
18
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “0” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “0”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
In addition, if the drawer
14
is drawn from the safe
13
, the tag detection sensor
16
abnormally operates and the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the signal “1”, which is the signal showing absence of the tag
11
, in spite of the tag
11
facing to the antenna
27
. This output “1” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted into the signal “0” by the inverting circuit
83
to be inputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, since the normal reed switch
17
is turned on because the magnet
27
accesses the reed switch
17
, the reed switch
17
outputs the signal “1” to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, since the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “1” to the second buzzer
86
, the second buzzer
86
is activated. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “0” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
[C] A Case that the Reed Switch
17
Abnormally Operates Due to a Failure
Since the tag
11
does not face to the antenna
23
if the drawer
14
is contained in the safe
13
, the tag detection sensor
16
cannot detect the tag
11
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the ON signal “1”. This ON signal “1” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted into the signal “0” by the inverting circuit
83
and is outputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, the reed switch
17
, which abnormally operates due to a contact failure, a short-circuit of wiring, and the like, is turned on in spite of the magnet
27
being separated from the reed switch
17
. Hence, the OFF signal “0” is outputted to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “1” to the second buzzer
86
, and hence the second buzzer
86
is activated. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “1” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is activated. Nevertheless, since the first and second buzzer
18
and
86
are activated in the state of the drawer
14
being contained in the safe
13
, it is possible to judge that the reed switch
17
is failed.
In addition, if the drawer
14
is drawn from the safe
13
, the tag
11
faces to the antenna
23
, the tag detection sensor
16
detects the tag
11
, and the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the OFF signal “0”. This output “0” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted by the inverting circuit
83
into the signal “1”, to be outputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, since the reed switch
17
, which abnormally operates, is turned off in spite of the magnet
27
accessing the reed switch
17
, the signal “0” is outputted to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, since the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “1” to the second buzzer
86
, the second buzzer
86
is activated. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is signal “0” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “0”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
[D] A Case that the Tag
11
Abnormally Operates Due to a Failure
Even if the tag
11
is failed due to disconnection of a wire and the like if the drawer
14
is contained in the safe
13
, this tag
11
does not face to the antenna
27
, and hence the normal tag detection sensor
16
cannot detect the tag
11
. Hence, the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the ON signal “1”. This ON signal “1” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted into the signal “0” by the inverting circuit
83
and is outputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, the normal reed switch
17
is turned off since the magnet
27
is separated from the reed switch
17
, and hence, the OFF signal “0” is outputted to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “0” to the second buzzer
86
, and hence the second buzzer
86
is not activated. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “
1
” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “0”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
Nevertheless, if the drawer
14
is drawn from the safe
13
, the normal tag detection sensor
16
cannot detect the failed tag
11
in spite of the tag
11
facing to the antenna
27
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the signal “1”. This output “1” from the tag detection circuit
24
is inverted by the inverting circuit
83
into the signal “0” to be outputted to the first input terminal
82
a
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. On the other hand, since the normal reed switch
17
is turned on since the magnet
27
accesses the reed switch
17
, the signal “1” is outputted to the second input terminal
82
b
of the exclusive OR circuit
82
. In consequence, since the exclusive OR circuit
82
outputs the signal “1” to the second buzzer
86
, the second buzzer
86
is activated. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is signal “1” and the output of the reed switch
17
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is activated. Nevertheless, although the first and second buzzers
18
and
86
are activated in the state of the drawer
14
being drawn from the safe
13
, the tag
11
is present in the drawer
14
, and hence it is possible to judge that the tag
11
is failed.
In this manner, if the tag detection sensor
16
, reed switch
17
, or tag
11
abnormally operates due to a failure and the like, the self operation management circuit
81
immediately detects this abnormal operation and activates the second buzzer
86
. Therefore, an owner of the safe
13
can instantly know the failure of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus. Hence, since it is possible to repair or replace this apparatus failed or malfunctioned, it is possible to increase the reliability of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention. In addition, by transmitting the output of the self operation management circuit
81
with the output of the AND circuit
19
(control circuit) to a security guard company or the like, personnel of the security guard company or the like, which receives the alarm, go to the location, and can judge whether the alarm is an alarm or a failure.
FIG. 10
shows a fifth embodiment of the present invention. In
FIG. 10
, the same symbols of
FIG. 7
are assigned to the same components.
This embodiment comprises a self operation management circuit
91
detecting abnormal operation of the tag
11
or tag detection sensor
66
. This self operation management circuit
91
is a branch circuit branching from the output side of the tag detection circuit
24
. The second buzzer
86
that is information means is connected to this branch circuit
91
through the time constant circuit
84
composed of the resistor
84
a
and capacitor
84
b
. The time constant circuit
84
has a function of preventing the second buzzer
86
from being activated when receiving intermittent external noise. In addition, a lamp or the like can be used as information means instead of the buzzer. The construction except the above construction is the same as that of the third embodiment.
The operation of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus constructed like this will be described.
[E] A Case That Both of the Tag
11
and Tag Detection Sensor
66
Normally Operate
If the upper lid
63
b
is closed, the tag
11
faces to the loop antenna
73
, and hence the tag detection sensor
66
detects that the tags
11
and
11
are present in the safe
63
, and the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the OFF signal “0”. Therefore, the self operation management circuit
91
does not activate the second buzzer
86
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “0” and the output of the micro switch
67
is the signal “0”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
In addition, even if the upper lid
64
b
is opened, the tag
11
faces to the loop antenna
73
, and hence, similarly to the above, the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the OFF signal “0”. In consequence, the self operation management circuit
91
does not activate the second buzzer
86
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “0” and the output of the micro switch
67
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
In addition, if the two tags
11
and
11
are taken out from the safe
63
in the state of the upper lid
64
b
being opened, the tag
11
does not face to the loop antenna
73
, and hence the tag detection sensor
66
does not detect the tag
11
. Hence, the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the ON signal “1”, and the self operation management circuit
91
activates the second buzzer
86
in a tone different from that of the first buzzer
18
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “1” and the output of the micro switch
67
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is activated. Thus, if the bank notes
15
in the safe
63
are taken out with the tag
11
without notice, not only the first buzzer
18
but also the second buzzer
86
are activated. Nevertheless, since the tag
11
is taken out with the bank notes
15
from the safe
63
, it is possible to judge that the bank notes
15
are taken out without notice.
[F] A Case That the Tag Detection Sensor
66
Abnormally Operates Due to a Failure
If the upper lid
63
b
is closed, a tag detection sensor
66
abnormally operates due to abnormal oscillation of a voltage-controlled oscillator (not shown), abnormal operation of an amplifier (not shown), or a failure or disconnection of a wire of another part constructing the tag detection sensor
66
. Therefore, in spite of the tag
11
facing to the loop antenna
73
, the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the ON signal “1” as if the tag detection sensor
66
did not detect the tag
11
. Hence, the self operation management circuit
91
activates the second buzzer
86
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “1” and the output of the micro switch
67
is the signal “0”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
In addition, if the upper lid
63
b
is opened, the tag detection sensor
66
outputs the signal “1”, which shows that the tag
11
is not detected, in spite of the tag
11
facing to the loop antenna
73
. Hence, the self operation management circuit
91
activates the second buzzer
86
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “1” and the output of the micro switch
67
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is activated.
[G] A Case That the Tag
11
Abnormally Operates Due to a Failure
If the tag
11
is failed due to disconnection of a wire and the like when the upper lid
63
b
is closed, the normal tag detection sensor
66
cannot detect the tag
11
in spite of the tag
11
facing to the loop antenna
73
, and hence the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the ON signal “1”. Therefore, the self operation management circuit
91
activates the second buzzer
86
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “1” and the output of the micro switch
67
is the signal “0”, the first buzzer
18
is not activated.
In addition, if the upper lid
63
b
is opened, the tag detection circuit
24
outputs the signal “1” in spite of the tag
11
, similarly to the above, facing to the loop antenna
73
. Hence, the self operation management circuit
91
activates the second buzzer
86
. At this time, since the output of the tag detection circuit
24
is the signal “1” and the output of the micro switch
67
is the signal “1”, the first buzzer
18
is activated.
If the tag
11
is present in the safe
63
like the above-described examples [F] and [G] and the second buzzer
86
is activated regardless of open and close of the upper lid
63
b
, it is possible to judge that the tag detection sensor
66
or tag
11
is failed.
In this manner, if the tag detection sensor
66
or tag
11
abnormally operates due to a failure and the like, the self operation management circuit
91
immediately detects this abnormal operation and activates the second buzzer
86
. Therefore, an owner of the safe
63
can instantly know the failure of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus. Hence, since it is possible to repair or replace this apparatus failed or malfunctioned, it is possible to increase the reliability of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention. In addition, by transmitting the output of the self operation management circuit
91
with the output of the AND circuit
19
(control circuit) to a security guard company or the like, personnel of the security guard company or the like, which receives the alarm, go to the location, and can judge whether the alarm is an alarm or a failure.
In addition, although a safe is cited as a box in the first through fifth embodiments, a show window case for displaying precious metal, a cash register that is a terminal of a POS (Point Of Sales) system, and the like also can be used as the box. In addition, although a buzzer is cited as alarm means in the first through third embodiments, a lamp or other alarm means also can be used, and this alarm means can be installed in a security guard company and the like. In this case, since the security guard company and the like can immediately know a burglar and the like of bank notes from a safe, the company can correspond to this matter immediately.
Furthermore, although a first buzzer is cited as alarm means and a second buzzer is cited as information means in the fourth and fifth embodiments, a lamp and other alarm means can be used as the alarm means and a lamp and other information means can be used as the information means.
Moreover, although plenty of bank notes are piled on a tag in the first through fifth embodiments, checks, important papers, and the like can be placed, and a bundle of a tag, plenty of bank notes, and the like can be contained in one piece in a drawer or the box. In this case, if the bank notes and the like are taken out from the drawer or box, the tag is always taken out with them, and hence it is possible to surely detect a burglar of the bank notes and the like. In addition, if the objects to be contained in a safe are metals such as bar gold and precious metal articles, a radio wave is cut off with the metals in case of these metals being placed of the tag. Hence, it is preferable to place the metal beside the tag and to bind the metal to the tag.
In addition, although two tags are contained in a drawer or a box in the first through fifth embodiments, one or three tags also can be contained. If three or more tags are contained, it is necessary to extend an antenna without using a pair of arm sections in the first, second, and fourth embodiments. Nevertheless, since the antenna in the third embodiment is a loop antenna, all tags can be detected without extending the antenna.
Furthermore, a core or a loop antenna of a tag detection sensor are covered with both of a wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member in the first through fifth embodiments, either of the wave absorber or electromagnetic wave shielding member can be used for covering.
Moreover, a loop antenna can be used as the antenna in the first and second embodiments, and a core where a coil is wound can be used as the antenna in the third embodiment.
In addition, the figures of the resonance frequency cited in the first embodiment are examples, and hence the present invention is not limited to this range.
Moreover, the self operation management circuit cited in the fourth embodiment can be provided in the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus according to the second embodiment.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
As described above, according to the present invention, a radio wave type burglar detection apparatus has such a construction that a tag having a resonance circuit block is placed with an object in a predetermined location, a tag detection sensor that is installed near the tag placed in this predetermined location detects whether the tag is present in the predetermined place, and a control circuit controls alarm means on the basis of the detection output of this sensor. Hence, if the tag is placed with the object in the predetermined location, the control circuit does not activate the alarm means on the basis of the detection output of the tag detection sensor. If the tag is taken out with the object from the predetermined location, the control circuit activates the alarm means on the basis of the detection output of the tag detection sensor. In consequence, it is possible to surely detect whether the tag is present in the predetermined location.
In addition, by containing a tag, which has a resonance circuit block, with an object in a drawer, containing this drawer in a box, detecting by a tag detection sensor, which is installed in this box, whether the tag is present in the drawer, detecting by a drawer sensor whether the drawer is drawn, and controlling alarm means by a control circuit, the drawer sensor detects that the drawer is not drawn regardless of the tag being present in the drawer if the box contains the drawer. Hence, the control circuit does not activate the alarm means. Furthermore, if the drawer is drawn from the box, the drawer sensor detects that the drawer is drawn, and the tag detection sensor detects that the tag is present in the drawer. Therefore, the control circuit does not activate the alarm means. Moreover, if the tag is taken out with the object from the drawer with the drawer being drawn, the tag detection sensor detects that the tag is absent in the drawer. Hence, the control circuit activates the alarm means. In consequence, it is possible to surely detect whether the tag is taken out from the drawer.
Furthermore, by containing a tag, which has a resonance circuit block, with an object in a box having an upper lid that can be opened and closed, detecting whether the tag is present in the box by a tag detection sensor installed in the box, detecting open and close of the upper lid by an upper lid sensor, and controlling alarm means on the basis of respective detection outputs of these sensors by a control circuit, the upper lid sensor detects regardless of presence or absence of the tag in the box that the upper lid is not opened if the upper lid is closed. Therefore, the control circuit does not activate the alarm means. Moreover, if the upper lid is opened, the upper lid sensor detects that the upper lid is opened, and the tag detection sensor detects that the tag is present in the box. Hence, the control circuit does not activate the alarm means. In addition, if the tag is taken out with the object from the box with the upper lid being opened, the tag detection sensor detects that the tag is absent in the box, and hence the control circuit activates the alarm means. In consequence, it is possible to surely detect whether the tag is taken out from the box.
Moreover, by placing a tag and an object in one piece in a predetermined location, or containing the tag with the object in one piece in a drawer or a box, the tag is always taken out from the predetermined location or from the drawer or box if the object is taken out from-the predetermined location or from the drawer or box. Therefore, it is possible to surely detect a burglar of the object.
In addition, if a drawer or a box is made of metal material, a magnetic field easily passes to the resonance circuit block of the tag by means of a soft magnetic member by sandwiching a soft magnetic member made of a sintered ferrite, a compact of ferrite powder and binder, or composite material of soft magnetic metal powder between the tag and drawer or box. Therefore, even if the drawer or box is made of metal material, it is possible to surely detect the tag by the tag detection sensor.
Furthermore, by covering a ferrite core, where a coil of a tag detection sensor is wound, and at least a part of a loop antenna, which does not face to a tag, with an wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member, electrical noise is absorbed by the wave absorber and is cut off by the electromagnetic wave shielding member even if the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention is installed in a location with plenty of electrical noise of a computer and the like. Therefore, it is possible to block injection of the electrical noise into the core of the tag detection sensor or the loop antenna, and hence it is possible to prevent the apparatus from malfunctioning.
Moreover, by providing a pair of arm sections in both sides of a core with protruding toward a tag, it is possible to make a radio wave, which is transmitted from these arm sections, have directivity. Therefore, it is possible to increase a ratio (S/N ratio) between a signal transmitted from the arm sections and a signal generated by electrical noise of a computer and the like. In consequence, it is possible to increase the sensitivity of the tag detection sensor, and hence to surely detect presence and absence of the tag by the tag detection sensor.
In addition, by detecting the abnormal operation of a tag, a tag detection sensor, a drawer sensor, or an upper lid sensor by a self operation management circuit, the self operation management circuit immediately detects the abnormal operation if the tag or the like abnormally operates due to a failure or the like. Therefore, it is possible to rapidly repair or replace the tag or the like that abnormally operates. In consequence, it is possible to increase the reliability of the radio wave type burglar detection apparatus of the present invention.
Claims
- 1. A burglar detection apparatus for detecting theft of an object contained in a box having a drawer, the apparatus comprising:a tag including a resonance circuit, adapted to be associated with the object; a tag detection sensor configured to detect whether the tag is in the drawer, and to provide a tag detection output; a drawer sensor configured to detect whether the drawer is open, and to provide a drawer sensor output; and a control circuit configured to control an alarm based on the tag detection output and the drawer sensor output.
- 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the tag and the object are configured as one piece in the drawer.
- 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the drawer is made of metal and the apparatus further comprises:a soft magnetic member sandwiched between the tag and the drawer.
- 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the soft magnetic member is made of a material selected from the group consisting of:a sintered ferrite, a compact of ferrite powder or binder, and a composite material of soft magnetic metal powder.
- 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the tag detection sensor includes:a loop antenna having a surface, not facing the tag, that is covered by at least one of a wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member.
- 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the tag detection sensor includes:a ferrite core, a coil that is wound around the ferrite core, and at least one of a wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member configured to cover at least a part of the core that does not face the tag.
- 7. The apparatus of claim 6, further comprising:a pair of ferrite arms provided at respective ends of the core and protruding toward the tag.
- 8. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:a self-operation management circuit configured to detect abnormal operation of at least one of the tag, the tag detection sensor, and the drawer sensor.
- 9. A burglar detection apparatus for detecting theft of an object from a box that has a lid, the apparatus comprising:a tag including a resonance circuit, adapted to be associated with the object; a tag detection sensor configured to detect whether the tag is in the box, and to provide a tag detection output; a lid sensor configured to detect whether the lid is open, and to provide a lid sensor output; and a control circuit configured to control an alarm based on the tag detection output and the lid sensor output.
- 10. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the tag and the object are configured as one piece in the box.
- 11. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the box is made of metal, and the apparatus further comprises:a soft magnetic member sandwiched between the tag and the box.
- 12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the soft magnetic member is made of a material selected from the group consisting of:a sintered ferrite, a compact of ferrite powder or binder, and a composite material of soft magnetic metal powder.
- 13. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the tag detection sensor includes:a loop antenna having a surface, not facing the tag, that is covered by at least one of a wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member.
- 14. The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the tag detection sensor includes:a ferrite core, a coil that is wound around the ferrite core, and at least one of a wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member configured to cover at least a part of the core that does not face the tag.
- 15. The apparatus of claim 14, further comprising:a pair of ferrite arms provided at respective ends of the core and protruding toward the tag.
- 16. The apparatus of claim 9, further comprising:a self-operation management circuit configured to detect abnormal operation of at least one of the tag, the tag detection sensor, and the lid sensor.
- 17. A burglar detection apparatus for detecting theft of an object, the apparatus comprising:a) a tag including a resonance circuit, adapted to be associated with the object; b) a tag detection sensor configured to detect whether the tag is in a vicinity of the object, and to provide a tag detection output, wherein the tag detection sensor includes: 1) a ferrite core, 2) a coil that is wound around the ferrite core, and 3) at least one of a wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member configured to cover at least a part of the core that does not face the tag; and c) a control circuit configured to control an alarm based on the tag detection output.
- 18. The apparatus of claim 17, further comprising:a pair of ferrite arms provided at respective ends of the core and protruding toward the tag.
- 19. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising:a self-operation management circuit configured to detect abnormal operation of at least one of the tag and the tag detection sensor.
- 20. The apparatus of claim 17, further comprising:a self-operation management circuit configured to detect abnormal operation of at least one of the tag and the tag detection sensor.
- 21. A burglar detection apparatus for detecting theft of an object, the apparatus comprising:a) a tag including a resonance circuit, adapted to be associated with the object; b) a tag detection sensor configured to detect whether the tag is in a vicinity of the object, and to provide a tag detection output, wherein the tag detection sensor includes: 1) a loop antenna having a surface, not facing the tag, that is covered by at least one of a wave absorber and an electromagnetic wave shielding member; and c) a control circuit configured to control an alarm based on the tag detection output.
- 22. The apparatus of claim 21, further comprising:a self-operation management circuit configured to detect abnormal operation of at least one of the tag and the tag detection sensor.
Priority Claims (2)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
9-356571 |
Dec 1997 |
JP |
|
10-018895 |
Jan 1998 |
JP |
|
US Referenced Citations (13)
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
2 230 164 |
Oct 1990 |
GB |