The present invention relates to papermaking, and more particularly to a papermaking belt comprising foraminous imprinting layer and a dewatering felt layer.
Papermaking is a well known art. In papermaking cellulosic fibers and a liquid carrier are mixed together. The liquid carrier is drained away and the resulting embryonic web of cellulosic fibers is dried.
Drying is typically accomplished in one of two manners, through air drying or conventional drying. Through air drying relies upon blowing hot air through the embryonic web. Conventional drying relies upon a press felt to remove water from the web by capillary action.
Through air drying yields paper having regions of different densities. This type of paper has been used in commercially successful products, such as Bounty paper towels and Charmin and Charmin Ultra brands of bath tissues. However, there are or may be situations where one does not wish to utilize through air drying.
In these situations, conventional felt drying is used. However, conventional felt drying does not necessarily produce the structured paper and its attendant advantages. Accordingly, it has been desired to produce structured paper using conventional felt drying. This has been accomplished utilizing a conventional felt having a patterned framework thereon for imprinting the embryonic web. Examples of these attempts in the art include commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,556,509, issued Sep. 17, 1996 to Trokhan et al.; 5,580,423, issued Dec. 3, 1996 to Ampulski et al.; 5,609,725, issued Mar. 11, 1997 to Phan; 5,629,052, issued May 13, 1997 to Trokhan et al.; 5,637,194, issued Jun. 10, 1997 to Ampulski et al.; 5,674,663, issued Oct. 7, 1997 to McFarland et al.; and 5,709,775 issued Jan. 20, 1998 to Trokhan et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
There are occasions where a conventional felt is used without a patterned framework thereon. In such cases, a paper web may be transported on a separate imprinting fabric and compressed in a compression nip formed between two rolls.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,421,600 issued Dec. 20, 1983 to Hostetler discloses an apparatus having two felts, three pressing operations, and a separate woven imprinting fabric. In Hostetler the web is transported on the imprinting fabric through the pressing operations before being delivered to the Yankee dryer.
Another such attempt in the art is illustrated by U.S. Pat. No. 4,309,246 issued Jan. 5, 1982 to Hulit et al. Hulit et al. describes three configurations where a nip is formed between two rolls. In each configuration, a paper web is carried on an imprinting fabric having compaction elements defined by knuckles formed at warp and weft crossover points. The imprinting fabric, web and a felt are compressed between the rolls. The web is carried from the nip on the imprinting fabric. In two embodiments, Hulit then transfers the web from the imprinting fabric to a Yankee drying drum. In the third embodiment, Hulit does not use a Yankee drying drum.
The Hulit arrangements have several disadvantages. First, two sets of nips are required, a first nip to imprint the web and a second nip where the web is transferred to the Yankee drying drum, Hulit recognizes that dryer drums may be utilized instead of, or in addition to, the Yankee drying drum. However, Hulit does not minimize the expense and inconvenience of requiring two separate nips for the configurations relying upon the Yankee drying drum—as most commonly occurs in the art.
Another attempt is shown in European Patent 0 526 592 B1 granted Apr. 5, 1995 to Erikson et al. Erikson et al. discloses another two nip configuration. In the first nip, the paper is imprinted between a press roll and a lower press roll. There, Erikson et al. dewaters the paper by placing the press felt directly against the paper. This allows the press felt to deform into the areas of the imprinting fabric not supported by knuckles, reducing the differential density effects of the compaction caused by the imprinting fabric.
Erikson imprints the paper and transfers it to the Yankee at a lower press roll. The paper is transferred to the Yankee drying drum at this point. However, the second press drum again imprints the paper. The problem presented by Erikson et al. is that at its second nip the imprinting belt is never in registration with the imprinted pattern provided at the first nip. Thus, Erikson unduly compacts the paper and destroys the caliper it creates by imprinting at the first nip.
Furthermore, Erikson et al. like the aforementioned attempts in the art, still requires a complex two nip system in order to bring the imprinting fabric/paper web combination into contact with a dewatering felt. Erikson requires the press felt loop to be outboard of the imprinting fabric loop. This arrangement creates a very expensive proposition for retrofit to existing machinery, as additional space, drives, etc. are required to add the separate felt loop. The cost of installing such a separate felt loop on an existing papermaking machine can be quite significant.
Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,194 issued Jun. 10, 1997 to Ampulski et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses an alternative paper machine embodiment where a first dewatering felt is positioned adjacent a face of the imprinting member as the molded web is carried on the imprinting member from a first compression nip formed between two pressure rolls and a second dewatering felt to a second compression nip formed between a pressure roll and a Yankee drying drum. The imprinting member imprints the molded web and carries it to the Yankee drying drum. The presence of the first felt adjacent the imprinting member at the two compression nips results in additional water removal from the web prior to transfer to the Yankee drum.
While Ampulski et al. represents a significant improvement over the prior art, Ampulski et al., still requires a complex two nip system in order to bring the imprinting fabric/paper web combination into contact with the dewatering felts. Ampulski requires the press felt loop to be outboard of the imprinting fabric loop. This arrangement creates a very expensive proposition for retrofit to existing machinery, as additional space, drives, etc. are required to add the separate felt loop. As mentioned previously, the cost of installing such an arrangement can be quite significant.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a web patterning apparatus suitable for making structured paper on a conventional papermaking machine. The invention further provides a web patterning apparatus capable of dewatering a paper web using conventional dewatering techniques such as a suction vacuum roll.
The invention comprises a papermaking belt. The belt comprises two lamina joined together in a face to face relationship to form a unitary laminate. The first lamina comprises a foraminous imprinting member having a paper web contacting surface and a second surface. The paper web contacting surface may include an optional patterned framework disposed thereon. The second lamina is a dewatering felt composed of non woven batting. The second lamina has a first felt surface and a second felt surface. The first felt surface of the second lamina is juxtaposed with and attached to the second surface of the first lamina. The second felt surface of the second lamina provides a machine contacting surface of the laminate.
Batting on the first felt surface of the second lamina extends through the foraminous imprinting member of the first lamina providing a hydraulic connection between the web contacting surface of the first lamina and the second lamina.
In one embodiment, the hydraulic connection is enhanced by needling the batting of the second lamina to the foraminous imprinting member of the first lamina.
In another embodiment, the foraminous imprinting member of the first lamina comprises two layers of interwoven yarns.
In another embodiment, the foraminous imprinting member of the first lamina comprises a jacquard weave or dobby weave.
While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the present invention, the invention will be better understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like designations are used to designate substantially identical elements, and in which:
Referring to
The belt 10 is a laminate comprising two lamina 20, 50. The first lamina 20 comprises a foraminous imprinting member 21 having a paper web contacting surface 22 and a second surface 24. The paper web contacting surface 22 may include an optional patterned framework 40 disposed thereon. The second lamina 50 is a dewatering felt composed of nonwoven batting 52. The second lamina 50 has a first felt surface 56 and a second felt surface 58. The second felt surface 58 of the second lamina 50 provides a machine contacting surface 59 of the laminate.
The first felt surface 56 of the second lamina 50 is juxtaposed with and attached to the second surface 24 of the first lamina 20. Batting 52 on the first felt surface 56 extends through the foraminous imprinting member 21 providing a hydraulic connection between the two laminae 20, 50. The two lamina 20, 50 may be attached by needling batting 60, comprising nonwoven batting 52 located near the first felt surface 56, between the first lamina 20 and the second lamina 50 to enhance the hydraulic connection therebetween.
The first lamina 20 is macroscopically monoplanar. The plane of the first lamina 20 defines its X-Y directions. Perpendicular to the X-Y directions and the plane of the first lamina 20 is the Z-direction of the first lamina 20. Likewise, the paper web according to the present invention can be thought of as macroscopically monoplanar and lying in an X-Y plane. Perpendicular to the X-Y directions and the plane of the web is the Z-direction of the paper web.
By “machine direction” it is meant the direction which is parallel to the principal flow of the paper web through the papermaking apparatus. By “cross machine direction” it is meant the direction which is perpendicular to the machine direction and lies within the plane of the belt.
The first lamina 20 includes a first surface 22 which contacts the paper web that is carried thereon and a second surface 24 which contacts the dewatering felt 50. The first lamina 20 comprises a woven fabric comparable to woven fabrics commonly used in the papermaking industry for imprinting belts. Such imprinting belts which are known to be suitable for this purpose are illustrated in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,301,746 issued Jan. 31, 1967 to Sanford et al.; 3,905,863 issued Sep. 16, 1975 to Ayers; and 4,239,065 issued Dec. 16, 1982 to Trokhan, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Woven fabrics typically comprise warp and weft filaments 26 where warp filaments are parallel to the machine direction and weft filament are parallel to the cross machine direction. The warp and weft filaments 26 form discontinuous knuckles 28 where the filaments 26 cross over one another in succession. These discontinuous knuckles 28 provide discrete imprinted areas in the paper web during the papermaking process. As used herein the term “long knuckles” is used to define discontinuous knuckles formed as the warp and weft filaments 26 cross over two or more warp and weft filaments 26, respectively.
The filaments 26 of the woven fabric may be so woven and complimentarily serpentinely configured in at least the Z-direction of the lamina to provide a first grouping or array of coplanar top-surface-plane crossovers of both warp and weft filaments 26; and a predetermined second grouping or array of sub-top-surface crossovers. The arrays are interspersed so that portions of the top-surface-plane crossovers define an array of wicker-basket-like cavities in the top surface of the fabric. The cavities are disposed in staggered relation in both the machine direction and the cross machine direction such that each cavity spans at least one sub-top-surface crossover. A woven fabric having such arrays may be made according to commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,239,065, issued Dec. 16, 1980 to Trokhan; and 4,191,069, issued Mar. 4, 1980 to Trokhan, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
For a woven fabric the term shed is used to define the number of warp filaments involved in a minimum repeating unit. The term “square weave” is defined as a weave of n-shed wherein each filament of one set of filaments (e.g., wefts or warps), alternately crosses over one and under n−1 filaments of the other set of filaments (e.g. wefts or warps) and each filament of the other set of filaments alternately passes under one and over n−1 filaments of the first set of filaments.
The woven fabric for the present invention is required to form and support the paper web and allow water to pass through. A preferred woven fabric for the first lamina comprises a “square weave” having a shed of 3 where each warp filament passes over two weft filaments and under one weft filament in succession and each weft filament passes over one warp filament and under two warp filaments in succession. A more preferred woven fabric for the first lamina is a “square weave” having a shed of 2 where each warp filament passes over one weft filament and under one weft filament in succession and each weft filament passes over one warp filament and under one warp filament in succession.
The caliper of the woven fabric may vary, however, in order to facilitate the hydraulic connection between the first and second lamina 20, 50 it is preferred that the caliper of the first lamina range from about 0.011 inch (0.279 mm) to about 0.026 inch (0.660 mm).
Air permeability is a measure of airflow through the woven fabric at a standard pressure drop across the fabric. The standard conditions are standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) at about 0.5 inch of water (cubic meters per second at about 12.7 mm of water). It is preferred that the woven fabric of the first lamina have an air permeability greater than 50 scfm (0.024 m3/sec) and more preferably an air permeability greater than 300 scfm (0.142 m3/sec) and most preferably an air permeability of about 300 scfm (0.024 m3/sec) to about 1100 scfm (0.142 m3/sec).
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in
As shown in
Preferably the framework 40 defines a predetermined pattern which imprints a like pattern onto the paper which is carried thereon. A particularly preferred pattern for the framework 40 is an essentially continuous network. If the preferred essentially continuous network pattern is selected for the framework 40, discrete deflection conduits 42 will extend between the first surface 22 and the second surface 24 of the first lamina 20. The essentially continuous network surrounds and defines the deflection conduits 42.
The projected surface area of the continuous network top surface 46 can provide about 5 to about 75 percent of the projected area of the paper web contacting surface 22 of the first lamina 20 and is preferably about 25 percent to about 75 percent of the web contacting surface 22 and still more preferably about 65 percent of the web contacting surface 22.
The reinforcing structure 23 provides support for the patterned framework 40 and can comprise of various configurations, as previously described. Portions of the reinforcing structure 23 prevent fibers used in papermaking from passing completely through the deflection conduits 42 and thereby reduces the occurrences of pinholes. If one does not wish to use a woven fabric for the reinforcing structure 23, a nonwoven element, screen, net, or a plate having a plurality of holes therethrough may provide adequate strength and support for the framework 40 of the present invention.
The first lamina 20 having the patterned framework 40 disposed thereon according to the present invention may be made according to any of commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,514,345, issued Apr. 30, 1985 to Johnson et al.; 4,528,239, issued Jul. 9, 1985 to Trokhan; 5,098,522, issued Mar. 24, 1992; 5,260,171, issued Nov. 9, 1993 to Smurkoski et al.; 5,275,700, issued Jan. 4, 1994 to Trokhan; 5,328,565, issued Jul. 12, 1994 to Rasch et al.; 5,334,289, issued Aug. 2, 1994 to Trokhan et al.; 5,431,786, issued Jul. 11, 1995 to Rasch et al.; 5,496,624, issued Mar. 5, 1996 to Stelljes, Jr. et al.; 5,500,277, issued Mar. 19, 1996 to Trokhan et al.; 5,514,523, issued May 7, 1996 to Trokhan et al.; 5,554,467, issued Sep. 10, 1996, to Trokhan et al.; 5,566,724, issued Oct. 22, 1996 to Trokhan et al.; 5,624,790, issued Apr. 29, 1997 to Trokhan et al.; and 5,628,876, issued May 13, 1997 to Ayers et al., the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Preferably, the framework 40 extends outwardly from the knuckles 28 of the reinforcing structure 23 a distance 44 less than about 0.15 millimeters (0.006 inch), more preferably less than about 0.10 millimeters (0.004 inch) and still more preferably less than about 0.05 millimeters (0.002 inch). Still more preferably the patterned framework 40 is approximately coincident the elevation of the knuckles 28 of the reinforcing structure 23. By having the patterned framework 40 extending outwardly such a short distance 44 from the reinforcing structure 23, a softer product may be produced. Specifically, the short distance provides for the absence of deflection or molding of the paper into the imprinting surface 22 of the first lamina 20 as occurs in the prior art. Thus, the resulting paper will have a smoother surface and less tactile roughness.
Furthermore, by having the framework 40 extend outwardly from the reinforcing structure 23 such a short distance 44, the reinforcing structure 23 will contact the paper at top surface knuckles 28 disposed within the deflection conduits 42. This arrangement further compacts the paper at the points coincident the knuckles 28 against the Yankee drying drum, decreasing the X-Y spacing between compacted regions.
Thus, more frequent and closely spaced contact between the paper and the Yankee occurs. One of the benefits of the present invention is that the imprinting of the paper and transfer to the Yankee occur simultaneously, eliminating the multi-operational steps involving separate compression nips of the prior art. Also, by transferring substantially full contact of the paper to the Yankee—rather than just the imprinted region as occurs in the prior art—full contact drying can be obtained.
If desired, in place of the first lamina 20 having the patterned framework 40 described above, a belt having a jacquard weave or dobby weave 80 may be utilized as shown in
The second lamina 50, like the first lamina 20, is macroscopically monoplanar. The plane of the second lamina 50 defines its X-Y directions. Perpendicular to the X-Y directions and the plane of the second lamina 50 is the Z-direction of the second lamina 50.
A suitable dewatering felt layer for the second lamina 50 comprises a nonwoven batt 52 of natural or synthetic fibers joined, such as by needling, to a secondary base 54 formed of woven filaments 55. The secondary base 54 serves as a support structure for the batt of fibers. Suitable materials from which the nonwoven batt can be formed include but are not limited to natural fibers such as wool and synthetic fibers such as polyester and nylon. The fibers from which the batt 52 is formed can have a denier of between about 3 and about 20 grams per 9000 meters of filament length.
The second lamina 50 has a surface batting with a denier of less than 5, and preferably less than 3. The surface batting on the first felt surface 56 extends through the foraminous first lamina 20 and contacts the paper web during papermaking. This contact enhances the water removal from the first lamina 20 and hence from the web.
The felt layer 50 can have a layered construction, and can comprise a mixture of fiber types and sizes. The layers of felt 50 are formed to promote transport of water received from the web contacting surface 22 of the first lamina 20 away from the first felt surface 56 and toward the second felt surface 58. The felt layer 50 can have finer, relatively densely packed fibers disposed adjacent the first felt surface 56. The felt layer 50 preferably has a relatively high density and relatively small pore size adjacent the first felt surface 56 as compared to the density and pore size of the felt layer adjacent the second felt surface 58, such that water entering the first surface 56 is drained away toward the second felt surface 58.
The dewatering felt layer 50 can have a thickness greater than about 2 mm (0.079 inch). In one embodiment the dewatering felt layer 50 can have a thickness of between about 2 mm (0.079 inch) and about 5 mm (0.197 inch). The dewatering felt layer 50 can have a compressibility of at least about 30 percent, and in one embodiment the felt layer 50 can have a compressibility of at least about 40 percent.
Compressibility is a measure of compactness of the dewatering felt under load. Compaction influences void volume and drainage of the felt. Compaction resistance is a desired property for dewatering felts compressed during the papermaking process. Thickness affects the compaction characteristics of the felt as well as felt wear.
The thickness and compressibility are measured with a constant rate of compression tester, such as an Instron Model 4502, available from Instron Engineering of Canton, Mass. The measurements are made between a smooth steel base plate (5.5 inches in diameter, Instron part number T504173) and a circular compression foot (0.987 inches in diameter) centered over the base plate and attached to a gimbaled mounting on a crosshead. The crosshead speed is about 0.5 inch per minute.
Prior to measuring the thickness and compressibility, the instrument is calibrated in the following manner to determine a correction factor as a function of loading pressure. The circular compression foot is moved toward the smooth base until the foot and the base just touch, and no light passes between them. This is considered the zero-load, zero-thickness point. The cross head is then moved back 0.500 inch (12.7 mm) to allow for insertion of the sample. (A gap larger than 0.500 inches (12.7 mm) can be used for thicker samples, provided the larger gap is precisely measured and used in place of 0.500 inches (12.7 mm) in determining the correction factors.) The instrument is then reset to zero displacement. A calibration compression is then done (without the sample in the instrument) at pressures between 0 and 1000 psi to provide a calibration crosshead displacement at the different pressures. When measuring the sample thickness at any pressure, the correction factor for that pressure is the calibration crosshead displacement at that pressure minus 0.500 inch (12.7 mm).
The sample is tested by placing it between the base plate and the compression crosshead and recording load versus crosshead displacement over a range of 0-1000 psi. The load is calculated as the force read from the instrument divided by the area of the compression foot. Thickness readings of the sample at 1 psi and 1000 psi are calculated by reading the crosshead displacement and applying the corresponding correction factor to obtain the corrected thicknesses at 1 psi and 1000 psi. The thickness of the felt layer 220 is the average of five corrected thickness measurements made at 1 psi. The compressibility of the felt layer 220 is 100 times the ratio obtained by dividing the corrected thickness of the felt layer at 1000 psi by the corrected thickness of the felt layer at 1 psi. The ratio is determined from an average of five measurements at 1 psi and five measurements at 1000 psi.
The dewatering felt layer 50 can have an air permeability of between about 5 and about 300 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) (0.002 m3/sec−0.142 m3/sec) with an air permeability of less than 50 scfm (0.24 m3/sec) being preferred for use with the present invention. Air permeability in scfm is a measure of the number of cubic feet of air per minute that pass through a one square foot area of a felt layer, at a pressure differential across the dewatering felt thickness of about 0.5 inch (12.7 mm) of water. The air permeability is measured using a Valmet permeability measuring device (Model Wigo Taifun Type 1000) available from the Valmet Corp. of Helsinki, Finland.
The dewatering felt layer 50 can have a water holding capacity of at least about 100 milligrams of water per square centimeter of surface area. The water holding capacity is a measure of the amount of water that can be contained in a one square centimeter section of the dewatering felt. In one embodiment, the dewatering felt layer 50 has a water holding capacity of at least about 150 mg/square cm.
The dewatering felt layer 50 can have a small pore capacity of at least about 10 mg/square cm. The small pore capacity is a measure of the amount of water that can be contained in relatively small capillary openings in a one square centimeter section of a dewatering felt. By relatively small capillary openings, it is meant capillary openings having an effective radius of about 75 micrometers or less. Such capillary openings are similar in size to those in a wet paper web. Accordingly, the small pore capacity provides an indication of the ability of the dewatering felt to compete for water from a wet paper web. In one embodiment, the dewatering felt 50 can have a small pore capacity of at least about 25 mg/square cm. Preferably, the felts will have an average pore volume distribution of less than 50 microns.
For effective water removal from the paper web, it is important that a hydraulic connection be made between the paper web, the first lamina 20, and the second lamina 50. As described above, the surface batting on the first felt surface 56 extends through the foraminous first lamina 20 and contacts the paper web during papermaking. The contact between the batting of the first felt surface 56 and the paper web provides the hydraulic connection between the web and the two lamina 20, 50.
The first and second laminae 20, 50 are preferably connected by needling batting 60 from the first felt surface 56 of the second lamina 50 through the foraminous imprinting member 21 or the reinforcing structure 23 of the first lamina 20. As the amount of needled batting 60 is increased, the hydraulic connection is enhanced.
For the embodiment shown in
Prophetically, an alternative means of attaching the first and second lamina 20, 50 involves applying an adhesive to only the discontinuous knuckles 28 on the second surface 24 of the reinforcing structure 23 and pressing the two laminae 20, 50 together. Such adhesive must be applied in limited amounts in order to minimize the blockage of water flow through the first lamina. Alternatively or in addition to the adhesive bonding, the needling of batting 60 may be limited to areas along edges of the belt 10 in order to minimize damage to the patterned framework 40.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3301746 | Sanford et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3905863 | Ayers | Sep 1975 | A |
4191069 | Sasso | Mar 1980 | A |
4239065 | Trokhan | Dec 1980 | A |
4309246 | Hulit et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4421600 | Hostetler | Dec 1983 | A |
4514345 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4528239 | Trokhan | Jul 1985 | A |
5098522 | Smurkoski et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5260171 | Smurkoski et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5275700 | Trokhan | Jan 1994 | A |
5328565 | Rasch | Jul 1994 | A |
5334289 | Trokhan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5429686 | Chiu et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5431786 | Rasch et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5496624 | Stelljes, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500277 | Trokhan et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514523 | Trokhan et al. | May 1996 | A |
5554467 | Trokhan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556509 | Trokhan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566724 | Trokhan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5580423 | Ampulski et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5609725 | Phan | Mar 1997 | A |
5624790 | Trokhan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628876 | Ayers et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629052 | Trokhan et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637194 | Ampulski et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5672248 | Wendt et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674663 | McFarland et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5709775 | Trokhan et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
394134 | Oct 1990 | FR |
EP 0 526 592 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO9819008 | May 1998 | WO |