The present invention relates to a novel screen system employing a zip-like retention device such as a screen, a method of mounting the same, and particularly but not exclusively apparatus for mounting a rail for guiding one lateral side of a zip-like screen.
The novel screen system comprises a particular form of roller blind and a pair of guide rails disposed on either side of an aperture to control blind position as it is deployed/retracted to cover/uncover the aperture. The blind fabric has flexible strips on its lateral sides which are trapped within, but free to slide along, a specially shaped groove or keyway in each of the rails. Each flexible strip typically is one half of a zipper, but could be manufactured by moulding a soft or semi-rigid high polymer such as hot-melt synthetic resin or rubber. A roller blind with such flexible strips for engaging corresponding rails is hereinafter referred to as a zip-like screen.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,638,844 discloses an early form of screen system, with a simple bracket for loosely mounting a guide rail. GB 2 235 005 discloses an improved bracket for loosely mounting a guide rail.
A blind system with a zip-like screen is only able to control blind position as it is deployed and retracted if the guide rails are correctly positioned. Even though the rails are loosely mounted in the brackets, a small angular misalignment of the brackets (leading to rails which are not parallel or skewed to one side) can result in blind creasing or jamming. The problem is exacerbated in such blind systems for apertures with a high aspect ratio. A novel bracket for preventing such misalignment was proposed in WO 2009/098433. However, the success of the system relied upon careful installation by an experienced workman, so it did not lend itself to the mass DIY market. Accordingly, the present invention has been devised with a view to addressing or at least ameliorating this problem in a more user friendly way.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided apparatus for mounting a rail for guiding one lateral side of a zip-like screen, comprising: an elongate body having a channel for receiving the rail, the channel having an open top extending in a first direction along the elongate body and a depth extending in a second direction from the open top towards an opposing base of the channel; and a support mechanism, configured to be positioned in the channel, for supporting the rail when received in the channel; characterised in that the support mechanism comprises at least one support member having a plurality of profiles spaced in the second direction when positioned in the channel, with each profile being configured to support the rail at a different depth in the channel.
With such apparatus, the or each support member enables the localised position (i.e. depth) of the rail within the channel to be adjusted during installation in order to achieve correct alignment with the one lateral side of the zip-like screen. For example, the plurality of profiles of the or each support member may be configured to support the rail in one of at least two different depths in the channel, such as three or even four different depths in the channel. Thus, even if the elongate body is slightly out of alignment with the one lateral side of the zip-like screen, the support member(s) may be used to compensate for the misalignment and help ensure the zip-like screen is able to be guided by the rail without creasing or jamming.
The at least one support member may comprise a resilient portion for resiliently supporting the rail when received in the channel. The resilient portion may be configured to allow movement of the plurality of profiles towards the open top of the channel in response to an applied load on the rail tending to pull the rail towards the open top of the channel. The degree of such movement may be less than the span of the plurality of profiles in the second direction. The resilient portion may comprise a spring member.
At least one side wall of the channel may be shaped to retain the at least one support member within the channel in use. For example, the at least one side wall of the channel may include a groove extending therealong for engaging one side of the at least one support member. The at least one side of the at least one support member may be a sliding fit within the groove. In one arrangement, the at least one side of the at least one support member may be resiliently biased within the groove by the resilient portion of the at least one support member.
The elongate body may comprise a first elongate part and a second elongate part which in use is coupled to the first elongate part, with the first elongate part defining a first side wall of the channel and the second elongate part defining a second side wall of the channel. Such an arrangement enables the apparatus to be installed in “layers”, starting with the first elongate part, as explained hereinafter. The first and second elongate parts may have interengageable profiles for releasably coupling the second elongate part to the first elongate part. The first elongate part may comprise a first wall inclined relative to a second wall, with each of the first and second walls being configured to receive a fixture therethrough for securing the first elongate part to a support surface. The first wall may be inclined at about 90° to the second wall. In this way, the first elongate part may be fitted to a support surface either forming part of the inner periphery of the aperture to be screened (e.g. a window reveal) or extending laterally away therefrom simply by using fixing means extending through the first or second walls. The first elongate part may have a substantially “L”-shaped cross-section, allowing unhindered access to each of the first and second walls. The second elongate part need only be coupled to the first elongate part once the latter has been secured in place and the support mechanism and rail have been put into position relative to the first elongate part.
The support mechanism may comprise a pair of support members, each having a plurality of profiles spaced in the second direction when positioned in the channel and configured to support the rail at a different depth within the channel, the pair of support members being spaced apart in the first direction. With such an arrangement, the rail may be supported at a first depth in the channel by one of the pair of support members, and at a second depth in the channel by another of the pair of support members. The first and second depths may be the same or different. If the first and second depths are different, at least a portion of the rail will be supported at an angle within the channel.
The pair of support members may be spaced apart using a solid spacer member configured to abut one side wall of the channel between the pair of support members. The solid spacer member may help to prevent light passing between the pair of support members which may be important if the zip-like screen is being used as a blackout blind. The solid spacer member may have at least one recess on one side which in use abuts the side wall of the channel, the at least one recess being configured to encourage localised deformation and countersinking of a screw driven through the solid spacer member from an opposing side, for example when securing the apparatus to a support surface.
The at least one support member may have a substantially “U”-shaped cross section, and comprise a first support part and a second support part which in use engages the first support part, with each support part comprising complementary components of the plurality of profiles. With such an arrangement, the at least one support member may be introduced into the channel one part at a time. The first and second support parts may have male and female interengageable profiles for engaging the second support part to the first support part. The first and second support parts may be identical, with each part having both male and female interengageable profiles.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method a installing a screen system, comprising: providing a zip-like screen which includes a blind mounted on a roller, the blind having flexible strips on each lateral side thereof, each of the flexible strips being configured to engage a keyway in a rail; mounting the zip-like screen with its roller in its intended position; providing the apparatus in accordance with a first aspect of the invention; mounting the elongate body of the apparatus to one side of the zip-like screen; selecting one of the profiles of the at least one support member which will maintain the rail at an appropriate depth within the channel to enable one lateral side of the blind to slidingly engage the keyway of the rail when coupled to the at least one support member, and coupling the rail to the selected profile of the at least one support member.
The second aspect of the invention may comprise any of the features described with reference to the first aspect of the invention.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The first elongate part 62 of the elongate body 60 is illustrated in
The structure of the first and second support parts 100, 102 is shown in more detail in
As shown in
The next step in assembling the apparatus 50 involves coupling the rail 52 to selected components 104 of the profiles 84A, 84B, 84C, 84D of the two first support parts 100, 100′. The rail 52 has a lateral flange 130 with an enlarged edge portion 132 which is configured to engage a space between the tabs 110 with a snap-fit action. When unconstrained, the rail 52 is able to flex along its length, meaning that it need not be installed parallel to the first elongate part 62. For example, a first end 134 of the rail 52 may be urged into engagement with the components 104 of the profile 84A towards the top of the first support part 100, whereas a second end 136 of the rail 52 may be urged into engagement with the components 104 of the profile 84C towards the bottom of the first support part 100′. It may be necessary to incline the rail 52 relative to the first elongate part 62 in such a manner in order to ensure the zip-like screen is able to be guided by the rail 52 without creasing or jamming, as will be explained in more detail below. However, for simplicity,
Once the rail is coupled to the first support parts 100, 100′, two second support parts 102, 102′ are coupled to the rail 52 as shown in
The assembly of the apparatus 50 is completed by coupling the second elongate part 64 to the first elongate part 62 using interengageable profiles 150, 152. The spring member 114 of each second support part 102, 102′ is introduced into a groove 154 extending along an upper portion of the second elongate part 64. Pressure is applied to the second elongate part 64 to compress the spring members 114 to enable hook-like profile 152 extending along a lower portion of the second elongate part 64 to engage a corresponding hook-like profile 150 protruding from the second wall 94 of the first elongate part 62. Once the hook-like profiles 150, 152 are interengaged, a filler strip may be introduced into gap 156 to resist disengagement of the first and second elongate parts 62, 64.
A method of mounting the apparatus 50 to the inner periphery of a window reveal will now be described with reference to
Once the rail 52 is aligned within the first elongate part 62 to register with the lateral edge 216 of the zip-like screen 206 as it is deployed, the assembly of the apparatus may be completed as described with reference to
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1203480.7 | Feb 2012 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2013/050216 | 1/31/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/128160 | 9/6/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4638844 | Hayashiguchi | Jan 1987 | A |
5482104 | Lichy | Jan 1996 | A |
6065525 | Wells | May 2000 | A |
6138739 | Crider et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6405781 | Davies et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6412538 | Welfonder | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6631749 | Zabala | Oct 2003 | B1 |
D616567 | Desrosiers | May 2010 | S |
7793702 | Biewer | Sep 2010 | B2 |
D696814 | Matus, Jr. | Dec 2013 | S |
8602081 | Komatsu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8607841 | Hayashiguchi | Dec 2013 | B2 |
D699480 | Dibben et al. | Feb 2014 | S |
9127501 | Stobich | Sep 2015 | B1 |
20030155474 | Dean et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20060144530 | Nagare et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20110100570 | Licciardi Di Stefano | May 2011 | A1 |
20150345215 | Roberts | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19724433 | Dec 1998 | DE |
0775797 | May 1997 | EP |
1087094 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1739273 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1927717 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2004211299 | Jul 2004 | JP |
WO2009098433 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/GB2013/050216 mailed on May 24, 2013, 8 pages. UK Search Report of GB1203480.7 mailed Jul. 10, 2012, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140076507 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |