This invention relates to apparatus and methods for extracting juice from a food mass such as fruits and vegetables, and more particularly relates to improved industrial apparatus and methods therefor.
Various apparatus and methods for extracting juice from fruits and vegetables have been known for a very long time with most all comprising three basic steps: forming the food mass into small pieces (e.g., by cutting, grinding or crushing), extracting the juice from the small pieces (e.g., by pressing), and separating the extracted juice from the food mass solids (e.g., by allowing the juice to fall from the food mass solids by gravity).
The two primary parameters for juice pressing are percent of juice extracted from a given food mass and extraction time. In order to maximize the efficiency of the juice extraction process, apparatus and methods are designed in an attempt to maximize the percentage of juice extracted from a food mass while minimizing the time to do so. The problem is that these two parameters of percent juice extracted versus time tend to work against each other in that the more the food mass is macerated into smaller pieces prior to juice pressing, the higher the chance the machine will become clogged resulting in machine downtime which thereby increases the time between successive pressings. Another potential problem is that should the food solids be made too small, it is more difficult to keep them separated from the juice being extracted therefrom. Conversely, the less the food is macerated (to decrease the chance of clogging the machine and to easily separate the juice from the solids) the less percentage of juice is extracted due to the failure of breaking open a majority of the individual plant cells in the food piece which contains the juice. Many prior art apparatus and methods have attempted to balance these two parameters but with varying success. There thus still remains a need for improved apparatus and methods which will further maximize percent of juice extracted while minimizing the time to do so.
The present invention addresses the above needs by providing apparatus and methods for extracting juice from a food mass which involves successively reducing the individual pieces of the food mass into smaller pieces while extracting juice after each food piece size reduction step. As used herein, words such as “reduce”, “macerate” and “comminute” (in any form) are meant to include any and all means by which a single food piece may be formed into multiple smaller pieces. A non-exhaustive list of such means includes cutting, chopping, grinding and crushing, for example.
A juice extraction cycle using multiple juice extractors and comminutors in accordance with the invention begins with delivering whole food pieces to be juiced to a first comminutor which performs a coarse chop. For example, in the case of apples or similar fruit, the “coarse” initial chop would preferably be into “cubes” ¼″ per side, and then the final comminuting step would have pieces resembling cubes with 1/64″ per side, or smaller. In the case of carrots which are firmer than apples, and more fibrous, the initial coarse chop might be into cubes, 1/16″ per side, and the final comminuting step would provide a food mass resembling the consistency of peanut butter.
The coarsely chopped food pieces are fed into the pressing chamber of a first juice extractor. The coarse food pieces are pressed with extracted juice falling into the collection tray and then directed to a juice holding tank. The tray of first juice extractor is retracted allowing the pressed coarse chop food pieces to fall into the hopper of a second comminutor which performs a medium chop on the now pressed but still coarse chopped food pieces. The medium chopped food pieces are then fed from the second comminutor into the juice extraction chamber of a second juice extractor whereupon the medium chopped food pieces are pressed with extracted juice falling into the juice collection tray of the second juice extractor and then directed to a juice holding tank.
This process may be repeated with any desired number of successive pairs of comminutors and juice extractors with the food pieces being chopped into successively finer and finer pieces as they pass from one comminutor and juice extractor to the next comminutor and juice extractor. Each time the food pieces are further chopped new surface areas of the food piece and thus more juice containing cells are revealed which may then be ruptured at the next pressing station allowing more juice to be extracted in a relatively short pressing time. The present invention thus provides apparatus and methods by which a maximum quantity of juice can be extracted while minimizing the time to do so.
The invention will further be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings:
Similar reference characters may refer to similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
Referring to
Once the operator has selected the desired maceration parameters, the food pieces are macerated (e.g., chopped) as seen at step 9. The macerated food pieces are then pressed as seen at step 11 where the juice is forced out of the food solids (called “pomace” or “cake”). The juice is directed to a holding tank while the cake is discarded as seen at step 13.
The steps illustrated in
While
Referring to
The food pieces from the first pressing are then advanced as rapidly as possible to a second comminuting operation as seen at step 10 wherein the coarsely chopped food pieces are cut again into yet slightly smaller pieces (termed a “medium” chop in the step 10). The medium chopped food pieces are then subjected to a second pressing as seen at step 12 which may be a relatively quick pressing as in step 8 (e.g., a minute or so in duration). As in step 8, the juice extracted at step 12 is directed to a holding tank (not shown).
This process of further reduction in food piece size and pressing is conducted in alternating serial fashion as seen in steps 14-24 for as many times as desired, usually from two to eight times, but more preferably about four to five times. After the final juicing as seen at step 24, the cake, which has been chopped and pressed multiple times, is passed to a waste collector as seen at step 26.
Although the steps shown in
A third hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder 62 is situated so as to be able to advance the sliding juice tray 58 via its piston rod 64 which engages sliding tray tab 65 via pin 66. The sliding juice tray 58 preferably has a foraminous screen 78 covering it which forms the bottom of the juicing chamber 71 bounded by vertical fixed platen 70, fixed platen 52, and the vertical sides 73 of the chamber 71.
When moveable juice tray 58 is fully extended with its leading edge against fixed platen 52 as shown in
This is more fully illustrated in
The juice extracting cycle at a single juice extractor is depicted in
At a given signal, the delivery of the whole food pieces 32 to the comminutor is stopped and juice extraction begins as shown in
The above describes one complete juice extraction cycle for a single juice extractor.
Referring to
The tray of second juice extractor 38b is retracted allowing the pressed medium chopped food pieces to fall into the hopper of the third comminutor 36c which performs a medium/medium-fine chop on the now pressed but still medium chopped food pieces. The now medium/medium-fine chopped food pieces are then fed from third comminutor 36c into the juice extraction chamber of third juice extractor 38c whereupon the medium/medium-fine chopped food pieces are pressed with extracted juice falling into the juice collection tray of third juice extractor 38c and then directed to a juice holding tank.
The tray of third juice extractor 38c is retracted allowing the pressed medium/medium-fine chopped food pieces to fall into the hopper of the fourth comminutor 36d which performs a medium-fine/fine chop on the now pressed but still medium/medium-fine chopped food pieces. The now medium-fine/fine chopped food pieces are then fed from fourth comminutor 36d into the juice extraction chamber of fourth juice extractor 38d whereupon the medium-fine/fine chopped food pieces are pressed with extracted juice falling into the juice collection tray of fourth juice extractor 38d and then directed to a juice holding tank.
The tray of fourth juice extractor 38c is retracted allowing the pressed medium/medium-fine chopped food pieces to fall into the hopper of the fifth comminutor 36e which performs a fine chop on the now pressed but still medium-fine/fine chopped food pieces. The now fine chopped food pieces are then fed from fifth comminutor 36e into the juice extraction chamber of fifth juice extractor 38e whereupon the fine chopped food pieces are pressed with extracted juice falling into the juice collection tray of fifth juice extractor 38e and then directed to a juice holding tank.
The tray of fifth and last juice extractor 38e is retracted allowing the pressed fine chopped food pieces to fall onto conveyor 44 which delivers the now fully pressed cake for disposal.
The juice extraction cycle using multiple juice extractors and comminutors as described above may be sequenced and controlled in any desired manner. For example, a system including sensors, microprocessors and software may control the operation in a continuously moving fashion such that the food delivery and all comminutors and extractors are running simultaneously in a staged and ordered fashion. For example, when juice extractor 38a indicates that it is empty and ready for more food pieces, a signal may be sent to instruct conveyor 34 to feed the appropriate amount of food pieces to comminutor 36a with the conveyor stopping when the first extractor is full and starting again when it receives an empty signal.
In this manner, pressed food pieces may be discharged from the extractor and new food pieces loaded into the same extractor almost continuously. With the five comminutor and extractor set-up shown in
If desired, the pressing pressure exerted on the food pieces by the juice extractors 38a-e may be successively increased at each juice extractor (e.g., juice extractor 38a is at pressure P1; extractor 38b is at pressure P1+n1; extractor 38c is at pressure P1+n2; extractor 38d is at pressure P1+n3, etc.).
The goal to maximize efficiency of operation by minimizing processing time while producing maximum yield is further realized by minimizing the pressing time at each juice extractor while still obtaining maximum juice flow for the food pieces size at a particular extractor. This is done by monitoring (e.g., using a flow rate detector) the juice extraction flow rate and stopping the pressing operation at the time where the juice flow rate at that extractor has peaked and begins to slow. As such, time is not wasted trying to extract more juice from the cake which will instead immediately travel to the next comminutor to be chopped into a yet finer particle size to reveal more surface area and juice containing cells that will then be more easily ruptured at the subsequent pressing station. In a preferred embodiment, no more than about 5 seconds will pass between the time the maximum juice flow rate has peaked and the extracted food mass is passed to the next comminutor. In a further preferred embodiment, the system includes five extractions of one minute each and about ten seconds of comminuting between each extraction.
As described above, too fine a maceration of the food mass at the start of a juice extraction process can lead to clogging of the machine and/or difficulty in separating the juice from the solids. By using discrete and successive comminutor and extraction stations processing ever smaller food particle size, the invention minimizes the chance that those things will happen at least within the first several extraction stations while at the same time maximizing juice yield by macerating and revealing more food mass particle surface area to which maximizes juice-containing cell rupture at each extraction station.
Although the invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it is understood that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the full spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims which follow.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/022142 | 3/11/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/145386 | 9/15/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18895 | Eiberweiser | Dec 1857 | A |
194457 | Newsam | Aug 1877 | A |
218879 | Hartshorn | Aug 1879 | A |
241348 | Gilbert | May 1881 | A |
250979 | Russell | Dec 1881 | A |
531388 | Root et al. | Dec 1894 | A |
630669 | Dale et al. | Aug 1899 | A |
929717 | Self | Aug 1909 | A |
1131032 | Berrigan | Mar 1915 | A |
1456257 | Stevenson | May 1923 | A |
1500964 | Starks | Jul 1924 | A |
1775830 | Reynolds | Sep 1930 | A |
2022679 | Leo | May 1933 | A |
2068013 | Fridlender et al. | Jan 1937 | A |
2087435 | Hubbert | Jul 1937 | A |
2689857 | Wilson | Sep 1954 | A |
3154122 | Batchelor et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3207064 | Hauser-Bucher | Sep 1965 | A |
3230054 | Ling | Jan 1966 | A |
3425869 | Farmer | Feb 1969 | A |
3478796 | Rafanelli | Nov 1969 | A |
3552304 | French et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
4214519 | Stollenwerk et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4225625 | Gerow | Sep 1980 | A |
4442767 | Johnson | Apr 1984 | A |
4586430 | Tichy et al. | May 1986 | A |
4643088 | Kollmar | Feb 1987 | A |
4680808 | Paleschuck | Jul 1987 | A |
4707370 | Kakis | Nov 1987 | A |
4892665 | Wettlaufer | Jan 1990 | A |
5031524 | Wettlaufer | Jul 1991 | A |
5146848 | Dufour | Sep 1992 | A |
5207152 | Wettlaufer | May 1993 | A |
5267509 | Wettlaufer | Dec 1993 | A |
5275097 | Wettlaufer | Jan 1994 | A |
5356083 | Wettlaufer | Oct 1994 | A |
6105640 | Holand et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123018 | Wettlaufer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6159527 | Wettlaufer | Dec 2000 | A |
6422138 | Ballard | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6457403 | Wettlaufer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6644366 | Johnson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6723355 | Gonnewig | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7448317 | Pinnow | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7469632 | McClune | Dec 2008 | B1 |
8535744 | Taghaddos | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8578846 | Sherwood et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
9763471 | Wettlaufer | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20030021867 | Günnewig | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20080098908 | Song et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090301318 | Torrisi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100326293 | Derubeis | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20140224137 | Wettlaufer et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140314918 | Wettlaufer et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201115592 | Sep 2008 | CN |
201604303 | Oct 2010 | CN |
202515365 | Nov 2012 | CN |
1364558 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1017561 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2806880 | Oct 2001 | FR |
2006-094902 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2120962 | Oct 1998 | RU |
2007068378 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2014-182423 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Norwalk. 2014. Model 280 Features. Retrieved on Oct. 9, 2015 from http://www.norwalkjuicers.com/features/. |
Norwalk. 2014. Model 280 Technical Specifications. Retrieved on Oct. 9, 2015 from http://www.norwalkjuicers.com/technical-specs/. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180070613 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62131632 | Mar 2015 | US |