Manual sharpening steels have been used for years with the belief that they are a means of straightening the burr from knife edges following the sharpening of edges with manual or powered abrasive stones. Butchers have found the manual sharpening steel to be useful when slaughtering or butchering in work areas removed from electrical power and running water. The exact nature of what can occur during the steeling process has been until recently the subject of extensive speculation with little understanding of mechanisms that can occur at the edge of a blade as it is being impacted under controlled precisely repetitive conditions against a sharpening steel.
Use of the manual steel rod has been more of a mystique than a science, lacking any scientific base or understanding. It has been said for example that the manual rods “smooth out microscopic nicks in the blades surface and realigns the molecules in the cutting edge”. Also one reads that “the best steels are magnetized to help draw the molecules into realignment,” or “the alignment of molecules in a knife blade are reinforced whenever it is sharpened, . . . and the process removes very little actual metal from the blade”. Others repeat that the use of a steel “realigns and smoothes the knife's edge”. Most often it is thought that the steel “burnishes against the hard surface of the cutting edge for the purpose of straightening it back out so that it is the same way as when it was manufactured”.
Clearly steeling of knife blades has been a poorly understood art and not a science. It is clear to those founded in science and physics that the force of magnetism incorporated in some commercial sharpening rods is far too feeble to have any effect at the atomic level in steel and even too feeble to alter the physical structure of any burr attached to the edge.
In the prior art the angle of the facet as presented to the hardened surface of the manual sharpening steel has been totally random and entirely dependent on operator skill. For this reason, prior means of steeling knife edges lack the precision and reproducibility discovered by these inventors to be necessary for creating an optimum consistent physical structure along the cutting edge of blades irrespective of the geometry and size of the blade geometry or the skill of the user.
While manual sharpening steels have been sold for many years they have not become popular with the general public because they are dangerous to use and a very high degree of skill and practice is required to realize any improvement in the cutting ability of a dull knife edge.
These inventors have recently demonstrated that if a knife edge previously sharpened at a given angle is repeatedly pulled across a hardened surface, generally harder than the metal of the blade, at a precisely and consistently controlled angle relative to the sharpening angle of the same blade that a remarkably consistent and desirable microstructure can be created along the edge of the knife blade. It has been shown that a manual sharpening steel can be used as the hardened surface needed to create this novel edge structure. This is a form of edge conditioning unlike conventional sharpening or conventional steeling.
In order to realize the optimum edge structure along a knife edge these inventors have found as explained in more detail in following sections that the plane of the edge facet is best held at an angle close to the plane of the hardened surface at their point of contact and that the angular difference between those planes must be maintained every stroke after stroke of the blade facet as the knife edge is moved along and against the hardened non-abrasive surface, or sharpening steel.
The unique microstructure which can be created along the knife edge consists of a remarkably uniform series of microteeth with dimensions generally equal to or less than the width of a human hair. The microteeth are very regular, and strong and they can be readily recreated along the edge if any are damaged in use of the knife edge.
Creation of this microstructure requires that the knife edge facets be held at a precise and reproducible angle relative to the sharpening steel, stroke after stroke. Under optimum conditions, the desired edge structure develops with only a small number of such strokes across the edge of the hardened surface or steel. Further unlike manual steeling which has lacked reproducible control of the angle, under the conditions described here the edge is not dulled, instead the original sharpening angle is retained even after hundreds of steeling-like strokes—so long as precise control of the angle is maintained.
The present invention incorporates some of the teachings of copending application Ser. No. 10/803,419 filed Mar. 18, 2004, all of the details of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Conventional manual so-called “sharpening” steels are usually constructed with a handle by which the steel rod can be held or supported. The steel is often held end-down against a table or counter by one hand as in
The improved apparatus and methods developed by these inventors to produce superior cutting edges depends upon precise and consistent control of the angles during the edge conditioning process. The present description relates a variety of apparatus that incorporate a hardened sharpening steel or sections of hardened rods to achieve surprisingly effective cutting edges on knives. A conventional knife blade 1, shown in section,
In order to realize optimum results with the edge conditioning apparatus for knives described here, it has been demonstrated that it is important first to create (sharpen) the blade facets 2 at a precisely established, known angle relative to faces 3 of the blade.
When the knife facets are sharpened as described a burr 4 is left along the edge of the blade. See
Consequently if the blade facets 2 are at angle A and the facets are presented repeatedly and consistently in a sliding motion in contact with the surface of a hardened material (such as a manual steel) at Angle C which is close to Angle A,
The desirable microstructure that can be created by the precise control of the angular relationship of the plane of the edge facet with the plane of the hardened surface is illustrated in
In creating the optimum edge structure by the novel and precise means described here the hardened contact surface 5 of member 13 will initially make contact with the facet only at the extremity of the facet 2,
The hardened member 13 can be a manual “sharpening” steel. Such steels are sold with a variety of surface treatment and hardness. Consequently some will be better than others in developing the unique microstructure described here and represented in
There are a number of possible designs for precision angle guides with the necessary angular precision that can be mounted onto a manual steel. Alternatively the angle guide structure can be designed so that the manual steels or short lengths of manual steel rods can be mounted onto the guide support structure. These must have the required precision to control accurately the angular position of the knife and its facets relative to the surface of the steel stroke after stroke in order to create the optimum microstructure referred to in this patent. Several examples of such designs are described here to be representative of a large variety of designs that incorporate the necessary angular accuracy and reproducibility.
One of the most reliable and reproducible physical features of a blade that can be used as a reference in order to locate precisely the blade facets and edge structure relative to the hardened steel rod are the faces of the blade. Features which are affected by the thickness of the blade or the width of the blade has proven to be much less reliable. Consequently the designs illustrated here rely on referencing the faces of the blade resting against a reliable angle guide for precise angular orientation of the edge facets on the steel structure as this microstructure is created.
When using a manual steel repeatedly without precise angular control, the relatively precise angle and geometry of the facets created in the prior abrasive sharpening process are steadily destroyed. The original sharpness of the edge is lost, the facets and the edge become rounded and the edge is quite dull. This process occurs quite rapidly particularly with the unskilled person and the blade must be resharpened with an abrasive frequently thereby removing more metal from the blade and shortening its effective life and usefulness.
As pointed out in co-pending patent application Ser. No. 10/803,419 it is preferred that the hardened surface of the object which conditions the knife edge should be non-abrasive. The invention, however, can be broadly practiced where the hardened surface is slightly abrasive. What is important is that the hardened surface should be sufficiently smooth or non-abrasive so that in combination with the knife guide the combination comprises means to minimize interference with burr removal and to repeatedly create and fracture a microstructure along the edge of the blade at the extreme terminus of the edge facets during repeated contact of the facets and the hardened surface to create a microserrated edge. Preferably, the hardened surface of the steeling rod would have a surface roughness no greater than 10 microns.
An example of a precision knife guide 15 tat can be mounted on a manual steel 19 or a section thereof is shown in
The spring 21 is designed to conform closely to the geometry of the guide planes 7 in the absence of the blade. Spring 21 can be supported and centered as shown by the steel rod or alternatively it can be supported by the base structure 23 for the guides. As shown in
This precision guide can be moved up or down the steel or it can be rotated around the steel to provide fresh areas of the steel surface for contact with the edge facets as previously used areas show significant wear. The guide can be readily moved and relocked in the new position.
While the angle C of the guide planes is shown as fixed, it should be clear that interchangeable guide plates 27 with different angles can be made available to coordinate with the angle of the sharpening device used initially to abrade and set the angles A of the edge facets. Alternatively the guide 15 and the guide plates 27 can be designed so that the angle C is adjustable and individually angularly adjustable.
The use of a spring 21 to hold the blade precisely is desirable for the best results but its use is of course optional. A full length manual steel or a shorter section of steel can be used in this design. If a conventional steel is used, its point or end can be rested on a table or counter as shown in
Alternative examples of precision angle guiding structure 29 to develop these desirable edge microstructures are shown in
As one face of knife 1,
In this arrangement pin 43 extends thru one of the guide slots to prevent any change in alignment of the sliding guide structure 35 with the axis of the steel rods. Similar pins 45 extend into the slots 33 into close conformity with the slot width to prevent lateral movement of the moving guide structure, 35.
The hardened steel rods 13 can be rigidly mounted onto base structure 31 or they can be supported on a slightly elastomeric or spring-like substrate that will allow them to move laterally a small amount in response to any significant variation in pressure from the knife edge structure as it impacts the steel surface.
The rate at which the desired microstructure develops and is reconstituted along the knife edge is related to amount of pressure applied by the knife edge facet as it is moved in contact with the hardened steel surface. There is a large amplification of the force applied manually to the blade as that is translated to the small area or line of contact between the facet and the steel surface at the movement of contact. That stress level can be moderated and made more uniform by only a very slight lateral motion of the steel surface.
The guide and the knife holding spring mechanism of
The various unique structures of controlling the angle of the knife as described and illustrated to optimize the novel results and edge conditioning obtainable by precision angle control when passing the knife facets into close angular contact with a hardened steel rod or other hardened surface are equally applicable to sharpen facets at precise angles in contact with abrasive surfaces. Accordingly, the invention can be practiced using an abrasive surface instead of a steeling member.
A further example of a novel structure of creating this unique microscopic structure along a knife edge is illustrated in
In the apparatus of
Precision apparatus such as described here for control of the angle while steeling a knife can be incorporated into food related work areas such as into butcher blocks, cutting boards, and knife racks or knife blocks so that they are conventionally and readily available in those areas where knives are commonly used.
Precision embedded guides such as illustrated in
These inventors have shown repeatedly the surprising advantages of the microstructure that can be created if the knives steeled are with this level of angular control. The microstructure provided by these guided means is superior to manually steeled edges for cutting fibrous materials such as lemons, limes, meats, cardboard and paper products to name a few. The steeled edges remain sharp even after repetitive steeling and the knives need to be resharpened less frequently using abrasive means, thus removing less metal from the blades and lengthening the useful life of knives.
This application is based upon provisional application Ser. No. 60/568,839, filed May 6, 2004 and is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 10/803,419, filed Mar. 18, 2004 which is based upon provisional application Ser. No. 60/457,93360/457,993, filed Mar. 27, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1075690 | Buck | Oct 1913 | A |
1181161 | Perry | May 1916 | A |
1681763 | Eaton | Aug 1928 | A |
1936990 | Piermann | Nov 1933 | A |
2098530 | Battocchi | Nov 1937 | A |
2249218 | Meade et al. | Jul 1941 | A |
2461690 | Leong | Feb 1949 | A |
2559273 | Brinkley | Jul 1951 | A |
2645066 | Andrews | Jul 1953 | A |
2652667 | Arnold | Sep 1953 | A |
2653667 | Genin et al. | Sep 1953 | A |
2896482 | Hyde | Jul 1959 | A |
3332173 | McMaster et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3619955 | Fischback | Nov 1971 | A |
3819170 | Longbrake | Jun 1974 | A |
4170343 | Longbrake | Oct 1979 | A |
4285253 | Edling | Aug 1981 | A |
4441279 | Storm et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4450653 | Fletcher | May 1984 | A |
4486982 | Longbrake | Dec 1984 | A |
4512112 | LeVine | Apr 1985 | A |
4538382 | Johannsen | Sep 1985 | A |
4602531 | Korhonen | Jul 1986 | A |
4611437 | Cohen | Sep 1986 | A |
4627194 | Friel | Dec 1986 | A |
4714239 | LeVine | Dec 1987 | A |
4716689 | Friel | Jan 1988 | A |
4777770 | LeVine | Oct 1988 | A |
4799335 | Battocchi | Jan 1989 | A |
4807399 | Friel | Feb 1989 | A |
D303209 | Friel | Sep 1989 | S |
4897965 | Friel | Feb 1990 | A |
4912881 | McDougall | Apr 1990 | A |
D310620 | Friel | Sep 1990 | S |
5005319 | Friel | Apr 1991 | A |
D328410 | Friel | Aug 1992 | S |
5148634 | Bigliano et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5185958 | Dale | Feb 1993 | A |
5199225 | Esposito | Apr 1993 | A |
5245791 | Bigliano et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
D342003 | Friel et al. | Dec 1993 | S |
D348598 | Friel, Jr. et al. | Jul 1994 | S |
5357717 | Friel, Jr. et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5390431 | Friel | Feb 1995 | A |
D357395 | Friel | Apr 1995 | S |
5404679 | Friel et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5431070 | Thames | Jul 1995 | A |
5440953 | Gangelhoff et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449315 | Friel | Sep 1995 | A |
5458534 | Campione et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
D368217 | Friel | Mar 1996 | S |
5582535 | Friel | Dec 1996 | A |
5582542 | Stein | Dec 1996 | A |
5611726 | Friel et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636556 | Friedlander et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5667427 | Airhart et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
D388304 | Friel | Dec 1997 | S |
5868611 | Friel | Feb 1999 | A |
D408254 | Friel, Jr. et al. | Apr 1999 | S |
D409891 | Friel et al. | May 1999 | S |
6012971 | Friel, Sr. et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6113476 | Friel, Sr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6267652 | Friel, Sr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6371841 | Ray | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6726551 | Friel, Sr. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6863600 | Friel, Sr. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875093 | Friel, Sr. et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7052385 | Swartz | May 2006 | B1 |
20040116055 | Friel | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060276110 | Friel et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60568839 | May 2004 | US | |
60457993 | Mar 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10803419 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11123959 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11123959 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 13175369 | US |