Patent Application
20170096363
This non-provisional application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) from Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-197363, filed on Oct. 5, 2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Technical Field
The present invention relates to an apparatus for producing a porous glass preform used for production of optical fiber.
Related Art
Optical fibers are produced by wire-drawing a glass rod, what is called an “optical fiber preform,” obtained by decreasing a diameter of a glass preform with a large diameter to a diameter suitable for the wire-drawing. The glass preform with a large diameter is obtained by sintering a porous glass preform (a soot body), produced by a vapor phase axial deposition (VAD method) or an outside vapor deposition (OVD method), by a heat-treatment to form it into a transparent glass.
The reaction vessel 4 is provided in the production apparatus 1, and a base glass rod 11, which is also called as “starting member”, is disposed in the reaction vessel 4 in a state in which both ends of the rod 11 are supported by the base material grippers 5. Each base material gripper 5 is covered with a cover 6 in the reaction vessel 4 in order to prevent exposure of the gripper to a high temperature caused by a burner 7 for deposition of glass fine particles (hereinafter referred to as a “burner”). Each base material gripper 5 is provided so that it protrudes from the inside of the reaction vessel 4 to the outside of the reaction vessel 4 and the protruded part thereof is set on the rotation mechanism 2 provided outside the reaction vessel 4. The rotation mechanism 2 rotates the base glass rod 11, gripped by the base material gripper 5, around the axis of the rod 11. The rotation mechanism 2 is provided on the weight detector 3, which performs a weight measurement of a product.
Glass fine particles (soot), produced by flame hydrolysis reaction of the raw materials using the burner 7, are blown onto a peripheral surface of the rotating base glass rod 11, and are deposited in a direction of a diameter of the base glass rod 11. The soot body 12 is formed in a manner in which the burner 7 is reciprocated along a longitudinal direction of the base glass rod 11, and the deposition of the glass fine particles is continued until a pre-determined outer diameter is obtained. The burner 7 is retreated so that a pre-determined gap between the burner 7 and the soot body 12 is secured according to the increase of the diameter of the soot body 12.
The exhaust hood 8 exhausts exhaust gas, generated by combustion of the raw materials, outside the production apparatus 1. The production apparatus 1 also includes a clean air supply device for supplying clean air, which is a cleaning gas, (not shown), and the clean air is supplied into the reaction vessel 4 (see, for example, JP 2003-40626 A). The clean air is air that passes through a filter capable of catching particles, such as an HEPA filter.
Recently, in order to reduce a production cost, methods for producing a preform having a high productivity have been required. For example, a larger soot body can be obtained in one production by moving a burner to the vicinity of a base material gripper when the burner reciprocates. However, when the burner is moved to the vicinity of the base material gripper, the following problems occur.
The reaction formula of starting gases, when silicon oxide, which is turned into a soot, is produced by a flame hydrolysis reaction, is as follows:
2H2+O2→2H2O 2H2O+SiCl4→SiO2+4HCl
As shown above, a large amount of hydrogen chloride gas is generated as a by-product, apart from the generation of silicon oxide. When the base material gripper is exposed to the hydrogen chloride gas, the base material gripper is corroded or rusted. Further, the heat cycle caused by the reciprocating motion of the burner provides large thermal stress to the base material gripper.
The rusts and the thermal stress cause troubles of the base material gripper. In addition, there are gaps on parts at which the base material gripper of the reaction vessel is provided, and outflow of the hydrogen chloride gas from the gaps leads to the generation of rusts on the rotation mechanism.
The thermal stress caused by the burner can be reduced by covering the base material gripper with a cover. However, when the base material gripper is covered with the cover, a small gap is to be left between the cover and the starting member, because the starting member needs to be rotatable. The hydrogen chloride gas flows from the gap, and thus even if the base material gripper is covered with the cover, the base material gripper is still exposed to the hydrogen chloride gas. Further, in a configuration in which the starting member is rotated by the rotation of the base material gripper itself, a small gap is also to be left between the reaction vessel and the base material gripper, because the base material gripper needs to be rotatable. As a result, when the hydrogen chloride gas flows to the inside of the cover, the hydrogen chloride gas flows outside the reaction vessel from the gap, and thus the rotation mechanism, which is disposed outside the reaction vessel, is also exposed to the hydrogen chloride gas.
The present invention aims at providing an apparatus for producing a porous glass preform, which can suppress the generation of rusts on a base material gripper or a rotation mechanism upon the production of the porous glass preform.
The apparatus for producing a porous glass preform of the present invention is an apparatus for producing a porous glass preform formed by depositing glass fine particles, produced by a flame hydrolysis reaction using a burner, on a starting member gripped by a base material gripper in a reaction vessel, wherein the base material gripper is covered with a cover, and includes a mechanism to supply gas to the inside of the cover to cause the gas to flow from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel. By forming the flow of the gas from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel, the inflow of hydrogen chloride gas, generated by a flame hydrolysis reaction, to the inside of the cover can be prevented, and the generation of rusts, caused by the exposure of the base material gripper and the rotation mechanism to the hydrogen chloride gas, can be prevented. In addition, the present invention can be realized only by covering the base material gripper with the cover and adding the mechanism to supply the gas to the inside of the cover, and thus it is not necessary to significantly change the structure of the reaction vessel. Thus, the present invention can be easily and inexpensively realized.
It is desirable to adjust a linear velocity V of the hydrogen chloride gas flowing from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel to 0.001 m/second<V<1 m/second, in terms of the effective prevention of the inflow of the gas and the acquisition of strength of a product.
The gas supplied to the inside of the cover is gas which does not generate rusts on the base material gripper and the rotation mechanism and does not affect the flame hydrolysis reaction in the reaction vessel. It is preferable to use, for example, clean air having 100 or less, per cubic foot, of particles with a diameter of 0.3 μm or less.
Embodiments of the present invention are explained referring to drawings below. The same number is applied to a common constituent element in drawings including the drawings used in BACKGROUND.
An apparatus for producing a porous glass preform of the present invention has a configuration in which a gas supply tube 9, which supplies gas to the inside of a cover 6, is added to a conventional apparatus 1 for producing a porous glass preform shown in
When the cover 6 is put over the base material gripper 5, a space is usually provided between the base material gripper 5 and the cover 6. When the base material gripper 5 is covered with the cover 6, a small gap must be left between the cover 6 and the starting member 11, as shown in
In the present invention, a gas supply tube 9, which supplies gas to the inside of the cover 6, is provided as shown in
In order to effectively prevent the inflow of the hydrogen chloride gas, it is necessary to cause the gas to flow from the inside of the cover 6 to the inside of the reaction vessel 4 at a certain degree of linear velocity. On the other hand, if the linear velocity is too fast, the deposition becomes uneven due to disturbance of flam of the burner 7 caused by the gas flowing from the inside of the cover 6 to the inside of the reaction vessel 4. Thus resulting product is easily cracked. For these reasons, the linear velocity of the gas flowing from the inside of the cover 6 to the inside of the reaction vessel 4 may be decided while taking a concentration of the hydrogen chloride allowable for the flow to the inside of the cover 6 and a yield of a desired product into consideration.
The gas supplied to the inside of the cover 6 is gas which does not generate rusts on the base material gripper 5 and the rotation mechanism 2 and does not affect the flame hydrolysis reaction in the reaction vessel 4. It is preferable to use, for example, clean air having 100 or less, per cubic foot, of particles with a diameter of 0.3 μm or less.
As described above, by forming the flow of the gas from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel, the inflow of the hydrogen chloride gas, generated by the flame hydrolysis reaction, to the inside of the cover can be prevented, and the generation of the rusts, caused by the exposure of the base material gripper and the rotation mechanism to the hydrogen chloride gas, can be prevented. Furthermore, the present invention can be realized only by covering the base material gripper with the cover and adding the mechanism to supply gas to the inside of the cover, and thus it is not necessary to significantly change the structure of the reaction vessel. Thus, the present invention can be easily and inexpensively realized.
Each constituent element in the apparatus for producing a porous glass preform of the present invention may be combined or divided as necessary. In addition, each embodiment is just an exemplification, and modifications can be suitably made within the scope of the technical idea expressed in the present invention. It is clear from the descriptions of set of claims that embodiments having such modifications and improvements are also encompassed within the technical scope of the present invention.
A hydrogen chloride concentration (ppm) outside the reaction vessel 4, and a hydrogen chloride concentration (ppm) inside the cover 6 were measured while changing a linear velocity (m/second) of gas flowing from the inside of the cover 6 to the inside of the reaction vessel 4, and whether or not a product, which obtained at each linear velocity, was cracked was tested.
The production method of the product is described. As a base glass rod 11, a quartz rod having a diameter of 55 mm was used. Glass fine particles were produced by flame hydrolysis reaction of a raw material using a burner 7, the particles were blown onto a peripheral surface of the rotating base glass rod 11 to deposit the particles in a diameter direction, and the burner 7 was reciprocated along the longitudinal direction of the base glass rod 11, whereby a soot body 12 was formed. The deposition was continued until the weight of the soot body 12 reached 130 kg. The combustion exhaust gas was exhausted from an exhaust hood 8 outside the production apparatus 1. The production time of the preform was about 40 hours.
The burner 7 including a multiplex tube with first to fifth tubes in which eight small nozzles were disposed between a second tube and a third tube was used. SiCl4 and O2 were supplied to the first tube at 18 L/minute and 18.7 L/minute respectively. N2 was supplied to the second tube at 16 L/minute. H2 was supplied to the third tube at 630 L/minute. O2 was supplied to the nozzles at 88 L/minute. Air was supplied to a fourth tube at 20 L/minute. O2 was supplied to the fifth tube at 170 L/minute. At this time, H2 and O2 are reacted to produce H2O. Also, H2O and SiCl4 were reacted to produce SiO2. The SiO2 was deposited on the base glass rod 11 to obtain a soot body 12. N2 and the air were used for preventing burning of the burner 7 caused by the combustion reaction. In this test, the deposition was performed under the gas conditions described above, and the gas was supplied to the inside of the cover 6. At this time, as the gas, clean air was used which was prepared by using an HEPA filter so that the number of particles having a diameter of 0.3 μm or less was adjusted to 100 particles or less per cubic foot. At that time, the linear velocity of the gas flowing from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel was adjusted by adjusting the supply amount of the clean air.
One product was produced in Example 1 wherein the linear velocity was adjusted to 0.01 m/second, one product was produced in Example 2 wherein the linear velocity was adjusted to 0.1 m/second, one product was produced in Example 3 wherein the linear velocity was adjusted to 0.5 m/second, one product was produced in Comparative Example 1 wherein the linear velocity was adjusted to 0 m/second (no gas supplied), one product was produced in Comparative Example 2 wherein the linear velocity was adjusted to 0.001 m/second, and one product was produced in Comparative Example 3 wherein the linear velocity was adjusted to 1.0 m/second. Hydrogen chloride concentration measuring devices were provided inside the cover 6 and outside the reaction vessel 4, which are not shown in
In Example 1, the hydrogen chloride concentration inside the cover was 145 ppm, the hydrogen chloride concentration outside the reaction vessel was 117 ppm, and the produce was not cracked. In Example 2, the hydrogen chloride concentration inside the cover was 10 ppm, the hydrogen chloride concentration outside the reaction vessel was 4 ppm, and the product was not cracked. In Example 3, the hydrogen chloride concentration inside the cover was 7 ppm, the hydrogen chloride concentration outside the reaction vessel was 2 ppm, and the product was not cracked. In Comparative Example 1, the hydrogen chloride concentration inside the cover was 571 ppm, the hydrogen chloride concentration outside the reaction vessel was 478 ppm, and the product was not cracked. In Comparative Example 2, the hydrogen chloride concentration inside the cover was 265 ppm, the hydrogen chloride concentration outside the reaction vessel was 231 ppm, and the product was not cracked. In Comparative Example 3, the hydrogen chloride concentration inside the cover and the hydrogen chloride concentration outside the reaction vessel were both 0 ppm, and the product was cracked.
From the test results, it was found that when the linear velocity V of the clean air from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel was 0.01 m/second to 1.0 m/second, the hydrogen chloride concentrations inside the cover and outside the reaction vessel could be suppressed to 200 ppm at which the generation of rusts may possibly be suppressed or less. When the linear velocity was 1.0 m/s, the product was cracked. This suggests that when the linear velocity of the clean air is too slow, the inflow of the hydrogen chloride gas inside the cover and outside the reaction vessel cannot be sufficiently suppressed, and the hydrogen chloride concentrations become high and the rusts are easily generated. On the other hand, when the linear velocity of the clean air is too fast, the clean air flowing from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel disturbs flame of the burner 7 to cause a uneven deposition, thus resulting the formation of a produce which is easily cracked. It is found that the rusts on the grip part and the rotation mechanism can be prevented and it is difficult to crack the product by appropriately maintaining the linear velocity of the clean air from the inside of the cover to the inside of the reaction vessel.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-197363 | Oct 2015 | JP | national |
