The present invention relates to the field of gas turbines, and in particular to a technique for refurbishing gas turbine nozzles.
In a gas turbine, gas is typically produced by the combustion of fuel. The gas is then passed over a collection of stationary nozzles, which discharge jets of gas against the blades of a turbine rotor, forcing the rotor to rotate. The rotation of the rotor drives the external load of the turbine, such as an electrical generator.
One problem with gas turbines is that the gas loading on the nozzles and the high temperatures in the turbine, eventually cause the stationary turbine nozzles to deform. This is a particular problem with turbines where the nozzles are made of cobalt-based superalloys and use a cantilevered design.
In one embodiment, a method of refurbishing a gas turbine nozzle comprises mounting the gas turbine nozzle in a fixture, heating the gas turbine nozzle to a predetermined temperature range, and applying force to the heated gas turbine nozzle distal from the fixture sufficient to reshape the gas turbine nozzle by a calculated amount.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for refurbishing a gas turbine nozzle comprises a mounting fixture, configured to hold an outer shroud of the nozzle, a hydraulic jack, positioned below an inner shroud of the nozzle, adapted to exert an upward force on the inner shroud, a heat source, disposed with the nozzle, and a plurality of thermocouples, positioned with the nozzle and adapted for monitoring the temperature of the nozzle.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for refurbishing a gas turbine nozzle, comprises a means for holding a first portion of the nozzle, a means for heating the nozzle, a means for exerting an upward force on a second portion of the nozzle, distal from the first portion of the nozzle, and a means for supporting the second portion of the nozzle.
Other systems, methods, features, and advantages consistent with the present invention will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description and be within the scope of the invention.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an implementation of apparatus and methods consistent with the present invention and, together with the detailed description, serve to explain advantages and principles consistent with the invention. In the drawings,
In a cantilevered gas turbine design, a ring 100, as illustrated in a radial view in
Each nozzle 110 is cantilevered from the outer shroud, using hook to hold the nozzle in place. As the stationary nozzles 110 deform in a downstream direction, commonly referred to as downstream deflection (DSD), the nozzle 110 provides reduced axial clearances and radial seal clearances are compromised. As a consequence of the compromised clearances caused by the DSD, sealing effectiveness is reduced, which can result in high wheel space temperatures.
Conventional refurbishment techniques attempt to rotate the nozzle 110 into the original position by adjusting one of the hooks 240. As illustrated in
But as can be easily seen in
Once the nozzle 110 is mounted on the fixture 500, the nozzle 110 is heated, then deformed in an upstream direction to counter the effect of downstream deflection, by force exerted from beneath the nozzle 110 upwardly, shown by arrow 560. In some embodiments, an additional force, shown by arrow 550, is exerted onto the inner shroud 220 toward the fixture 510.
By pushing upward on the heated nozzle 110, the deformation caused by DSD is actually reversed, bringing the nozzle 110 closer to its configuration when newly manufactured. Instead of merely rotating the deformed nozzle 110, the nozzle 110 is reshaped to reduce or eliminate the deformation, rotating the vanes 230 and inner shroud 220 relative to the hooks 240 and outer shroud 210. After the nozzle 110 is reshaped, if the nozzle 110 had previously been refurbished by the conventional hook adjustment technique, the modified hook 240 is rebuilt by removing the pad 320 that was added to the undersurface 330 of the hook 240, and welding back a pad onto an upper surface of the hook 240 where the previous refurbishment had machined off a portion 310 of the original hook 240. This rebuilding of the hook 240 can close segment seals 340 that may have been opened by the earlier refurbishments.
The order of steps of the above technique of first heating the nozzle 110, then reshaping it, and finally rebuilding the hook 240, can be rearranged, by first rebuilding the hook 240, then reshaping the nozzle 110 sufficiently on fixture 500 to rotate the vanes 230 and inner shroud 220 back into their original position relative to the hook 240. But the reordered technique is not as good as the preferred technique, because the hook 240 cannot be positioned as precisely. When the hook is rebuilt last, the desired position of the hook 240 can be calculated by an operator of the reshaping apparatus, then the nozzle 110 reshaped to approximately the right shape. After the heated nozzle 110 is reshaped, the hook 240 can be rebuilt to precisely the desired configuration, ensuring the nozzle 110, when put back into the gas turbine, is within or close to the manufacturer's specifications.
Superalloys such as the cobalt-based superalloys frequently used in the construction of the nozzles 110 are not generally considered pliable under heating, and are metallurgically created to attempt to avoid deformation at high temperatures. So one of skill in the art would have expected that heating the nozzle 110 would not allow for the controlled force reshaping necessary for refurbishment of the nozzle 110, but would have caused fractures or other metallurgical damage to the nozzle 110. Applicants have tested the nozzle 110 and found no such damage to the nozzle 110 after the reshaping treatment.
In an embodiment where both the force 560 and force 550 are used, the inner shroud 220 can be caused to rotate in an additional dimension. But in experimental testing, it was determined that use of the force 560 is typically sufficient, and that the rotation caused by the force 550 tends to occur without the force 550 as the nozzle 110 is pushed closer into its original configuration. In such an embodiment, illustrated in
Force 560 is applied by pressure from a hydraulic jack, typically raising one or more jack shafts 600 through the work surface 510. Preferably, at least two jack shafts 600 are used, exerting force equally or differentially as desired on the inner shroud 220. With a differential jacking, a desired radial rotation of the inner shroud 220 and vanes 230 can be performed if needed. Once the nozzle 110 has been jacked up sufficiently, jack stands can be inserted to allow the inner shroud 210 to rest on the jack stands and withdrawal of the jack shafts 600 while allowing the reshaped nozzle 110 to cool, before completing the refurbishment by adjustment of the hook 240, as described above. Any convenient kind of jack stand can be used, for example, a screw-type jack stand, such as the jack stands 910 in
To heat the nozzle 110 prior to reshaping, the nozzle 110 is first insulated using insulating blankets 800, as shown in
In one embodiment, the heating is achieved by using induction heating coils 810, which are typically composed of copper tubing, with a high temperature insulation mesh surrounding the tubing. The tubing has high frequency electricity provided to it, and cooling water on the inside, creating an electromagnetic effect that induces electrical currents within the part surrounded by the high frequency magnetic field. Because an even temperature is desirable for the reshaping of the nozzle 110, the induction heating coils are wrapped around the nozzle 110. Various configurations of the coils can be used, such as shown in
The use of induction heating is exemplary and illustrative only. Other heating techniques can be used, such as quartz lamps, resistance heating, flame heating, etc.
Typically, a plurality of thermocouples 1010, as illustrated in
The temperature used for this technique is dependent upon the materials used to construct the nozzle 110. For some nozzles 110, the superalloy metal is heated to approximately 2000° F., and generally between 1800° F. and 2100° F. The specific temperatures are exemplary and illustrative only, and different superalloy metals would require heating to a different range. For any nozzle 110, however, the nozzle 110 should be heated to a temperature above a hardening temperature, but below a melting point of the metal.
After refurbishment, the nozzle 110 can be checked for compliance with the manufacturer's specifications by placing the nozzle 110 into a testing saddle such as the exemplary and illustrative saddle fixture 1102 of
While certain exemplary embodiments have been described in details and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, which is determined by the claims that follow.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/192,685, which was filed on Aug. 15, 2008. The aforementioned patent application is incorporated herein by reference to the extent consistent with the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3021673 | Mock | Feb 1962 | A |
3300180 | Tuttle et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3693347 | Kydd et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3728859 | Seiler | Apr 1973 | A |
3826080 | De Corso et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3859787 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3937007 | Kappler | Feb 1976 | A |
3985465 | Sheldon et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4012904 | Nogle | Mar 1977 | A |
4041699 | Schelp | Aug 1977 | A |
4067190 | Hamm et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4160362 | Martens et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4195476 | Wood | Apr 1980 | A |
4257235 | Morishita et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4259837 | Russell et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4667465 | Munk | May 1987 | A |
4733527 | Kidd | Mar 1988 | A |
4832252 | Fraser | May 1989 | A |
4835962 | Rutter | Jun 1989 | A |
4876849 | Klingels | Oct 1989 | A |
4889470 | Scalzo | Dec 1989 | A |
4924581 | Jakobsen | May 1990 | A |
4928478 | Maslak | May 1990 | A |
5060842 | Qureshi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062205 | Fraser | Nov 1991 | A |
5081843 | Ishibashi et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5086979 | Koblish et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5117636 | Bechtel, II et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5199265 | Borkowicz | Apr 1993 | A |
5235814 | Leonard | Aug 1993 | A |
5251447 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5259727 | Quinn | Nov 1993 | A |
5269057 | Mendham | Dec 1993 | A |
5456578 | Honda et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5477671 | Mowill | Dec 1995 | A |
5697151 | Werner et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6332272 | Sinnott et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6394750 | Hiskes | May 2002 | B1 |
6502303 | Updegrove et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6568077 | Hellemann et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6892931 | Steplewski et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7008170 | Proveaux et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036318 | Munson, Jr. | May 2006 | B1 |
7146990 | Ngo et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7179052 | Sasaki et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7484928 | Arness et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7556475 | Roberts, III et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7722314 | Burdgick | May 2010 | B2 |
7762783 | Cairo et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8186056 | Willis et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8771786 | Raiche et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9068459 | Sassatelli et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9085053 | Tholen et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9138793 | Nguyen-Dinh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20030005698 | Keller | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030082053 | Jackson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050172485 | Mussen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070267109 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280820 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080289179 | Pellet et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000102 | Willis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090229101 | Ahmad et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090255114 | Kernozicky et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090313822 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
60173323 | Sep 1985 | JP |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2008/085640—Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty), International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 17, 2010, 9 pages. |
PCT/US2008/085640—Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, International Search Report, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Feb. 12, 2009, 10 pages. |
PCT/US2010/034425—Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter II of the Patent Cooperation Treaty), International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jun. 1, 2011, 6 pages. |
PCT/US2010/034425—Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, International Search Report, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jul. 15, 2010, 9 pages. |
Brandt et al, “GE Gas Turbine Design Philosophy (GER-3434D)”, General Electric Company, Sep. 1994, Schenectady, NY, 26 pages. |
Cocca et al, “Performance and Reliability Improvements for MS5002 Gas Turbines (GER-4171)”, General Electric Company, Date Unknown, Schenectady, NY, 26 pages. |
Gill, Jennifer E., “Uprate Options for the MS9001 Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine (GER-3928B)”, General Electric Company, Date Unknown, Schenectady, NY, 25 pages. |
Ginter et al, “Uprate Options for the MS7001 Heavy Duty Gas Turbine (GER-3808C)”, General Electric Company, Dec. 2006, Atlanta, GA, 68 pages. |
Johnston, J.R., “Performance and Reliability Improvements for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines (GER-3571H)”, General Electric Company, Oct. 2000, Schenectady, NY, 50 pages. |
Pallos, K.J., “Gas Turbine Repair Technology (GER-3957B)”, General Electric Company, Apr. 2001, Atlanta, GA, 30 pages. |
Schilke, P.W., “Advanced Gas Turbine Materials and Coatings (GER-3569G)”, General Electric Company, Aug. 2004, Schenectady, NY, 30 pages. |
Scoretz et al., “Industrial Steam Turbine Value Packages (GER-4191A)”, General Electric Company, Dec. 2005, Atlanta, GA, 32 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150060438 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12192685 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 14537229 | US |