Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6216787
-
Patent Number
6,216,787
-
Date Filed
Thursday, October 21, 199925 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, April 17, 200124 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Gellner; Michael L.
- Barrera; Ramon M.
Agents
- Keaty Professional Law Corporation
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 175 328
- 166 665
- 166 311
-
International Classifications
- E21B2100
- E21B1000
- E21C2504
-
Abstract
A tool for retrieving metal objects from a wellbore has a plurality of magnet assemblies spaced longitudinally along a tool body. Each magnet assembly has a plurality of magnet members, which can be arcuate or longitudinal, covering a majority surface area of the tool body. In the embodiment of the invention having longitudinal members, magnet protectors are secured immediately adjacent to a corresponding magnet member for deflecting striking force of the metal particles being attracted to the magnet during rotation of the tool. A trap space if formed between the magnet and an adjacent magnet protector for retaining more metal particles within the magnet assemblies.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to wellbore tools and more particularly to an apparatus for retrieval of metal objects, such as cuttings and other foreign objects that accumulate in the process of perforating or milling over bridge plugs and other down hole obstructions from a wellbore.
Various types of bridge plugs are conventionally used in the oil and gas industry. These bridge plugs are installed in the annulus and are often covered in cement. Removal of such plugs can sometimes pose a problem for the industry. A rotary bit drills the cement and plugs out, while some of the cuttings of the plugs are carried out to the surface by a liquid circulated down hole.
Sometimes, a production packer needs to be removed together with the metal pipe that it surrounds. In those cases, milling tools with gravity fed boot baskets are used for retrieving pieces of metal from the wellbore. After retrieval of the production packer, it may become necessary to run a conventional fishing magnet to retrieve additional junk and cuttings.
A conventional fishing magnet is mounted inside a housing that is lowered into a wellbore. It is limited in the ability to retrieve cuttings in that its magnetization is restricted to the extreme bottom surface of the magnet. The fact that circulating fluids lift the cuttings away from the bottom surface of the magnet renders that conventional fishing magnet useless in this situation.
Often times, a boot basket is used for collecting cuttings that did not attach themselves to the conventional magnet. A boot basket has small openings for catching these particles. Consequently, many large size pieces or very small pieces suspended in the fluid flow are not trapped in the basket and remain in the wellbore.
The present invention contemplates elimination of drawbacks associated with the prior art and provision of a wellbore apparatus for removal of metal objects, such as cuttings, and other foreign particles that provides for the use of sets of magnets spaced longitudinally along the tool body.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide an apparatus for retrieval of metal cuttings and other foreign objects from a wellbore.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a packer-milling tool with magnets set in a spaced relationship longitudinally along the tool body to increase “catching” capacity of the tool.
These and other objects of the invention are achieved through a provision of an apparatus for removal of metal cuttings and other foreign objects from a wellbore that uses at least two magnet assemblies vertically spaced from each other and mounted on the body of the tool. Each magnet assembly is comprised of a plurality of magnets encircling the body of the tool and covering a surface area greater than one half of the tool body.
One of the embodiments of the invention provides for arcuate in cross section magnet members that are detachably secured on the tool body. The second embodiment provides for trapezoidal in cross section magnet members that extend longitudinally in parallel relationship to a central axis of the tool body. The tool of the second embodiment further provides for magnet protectors mounted adjacent to each magnet member. Each magnet protector has a triangular cross section and has a slanted surface that is angled in the direction of rotation.
The space between each magnet and the next adjacent magnet protector forms a “trap” that receives and retains metal particles pushed away by the leading surface of the adjacent magnet member. Consequently, the capability of the tool to retain cuttings for subsequent retrieval to the surface is significantly increased in comparison with conventional magnet tools.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Reference will now be made to the drawings, wherein like parts are designated by like numerals and wherein
FIG. 1
is a side view of the packer removal tool of the present invention.
FIG. 2
is a cross-sectional view of the magnet used in the tool of the present invention.
FIG. 3
is a top view of the tool of the second embodiment of the present invention lowered into the wellbore.
FIG. 4
is a detail view of the second embodiment of the present invention showing three vertically spaced magnet assemblies.
FIG. 5
is a magnet profile suitable for use in the second embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6
is a schematic view showing position of the apparatus of the present invention in combination with a conventional milling tool.
FIG. 7
is a schematic view showing the apparatus of the present invention in combination with a ported jet sub for admitting a circulating fluid.
DETAIL DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Turning now to the drawings in more detail, numeral
10
designates the well bore apparatus in accordance with the present invention. The apparatus
10
comprises a generally cylindrical body
12
provided with a central through opening
14
. The circulating fluids are admitted into the central opening
14
from an upper end
16
of the body
12
.
An upper sub
18
is fixedly secured in circumferential relationship about the body
12
adjacent the upper end
16
, and a lower sub
20
is secured in circumferential relationship about the body
12
adjacent a lower end
22
. The upper sub
18
is provided with external threads
24
and the lower sub
26
is provided with internal threads
28
. The threads
24
allow connection of the tool
10
to a bumper jar
30
schematically shown in
FIGS. 6 and 7
. The bumper jar
30
is conventionally mounted on a drill string above the junk and cuttings removal tools.
The internal threads
28
on the lower sub
26
can be used for attaching the apparatus
10
to a jet sub
32
for admitting circulating liquid into a wellbore
34
(FIG.
7
). The liquid exits the jet sub
32
through one or more openings, or ports
36
formed in the sub
32
. Alternatively, the internal threads
28
may be used for attaching the tool
10
to a boot basket
38
(FIG.
6
). The boot basket
38
conventionally carries at its lower end a milling tool
40
(FIG.
6
).
Mounted between the subs
18
and
20
are two sets of magnet assemblies
42
and
44
. Of course, more than two sets of magnet assemblies may be provided on the drill string, if desired. The upper magnet assembly
42
is vertically spaced from the lower magnet assembly
44
.
Each magnet assembly
42
and
44
comprises a plurality of arcuate magnets
46
and
48
(
FIG. 2
) that are detachably secured to the body
12
by screws
50
or other similarly suitable means. When positioned on the body
12
, the magnets
46
and
48
resemble a cylindrical sleeve having an inner diameter slightly greater than an outside diameter of the body
12
. The magnet assemblies
42
and
44
, occupying a large surface of the tool
10
, allow retrieval of a significantly greater amount of metal pieces from the wellbore
34
.
Turning now to the second embodiment of the present invention, the tool
100
comprises a cylindrical body
102
having a through opening
104
for admitting circulating fluid into the wellbore
34
. An upper sub
106
has external threads
108
. The upper sub
106
and a lower sub
110
(partially shown in
FIG. 4
) are used in a manner similar to that of the subs
18
and
26
of the first embodiment of the present invention.
Mounted between the subs
106
and
108
are magnet assemblies
110
,
112
and
114
. The are vertically spaced from each other and separated by retainer rings
116
and
118
. The retainer rings
116
and
118
are split rings provided with locking members
120
for securing the magnets on the body
102
. The retainer rings
116
and
118
also help in retrieving of heavy shrapnel by creating a “stop,” thereby preventing a sliding and/or flushing effect.
As can be seen in the drawings, magnet assemblies
110
,
112
and
114
comprise a plurality of individual magnets
122
. The magnets
122
have “north” and “south” members, attracting variously charged metal cuttings. A portion of each magnet
122
fits into a specially provided slot
124
formed in the body
102
. As shown in
FIG. 5
, each magnet
122
has a trapezoidal cross-section with slanted opposite ends
126
and
128
. A longer side
130
fits into the groove
124
.
Each magnet
122
is provided with a “heel,” or magnet protector
132
. Each protector member
132
has a triangular cross-section with one side
134
of the protector being longer than the side of the magnet
122
positioned next to it. The slanted side
136
of the protector is angled in the direction of rotation of the tool
100
.
When cuttings appear in an annulus
140
of a casing
142
the magnet protectors tend to deflect the striking force of the metal cuttings away from the magnet surfaces and cause them to strike the inside wall
144
of the casing
142
. The cuttings are then pushed upwardly. The cuttings then attach themselves to the magnets
122
and can be carried to the surface when the tool
100
is retrieved.
Some of the cuttings fall between the magnets
122
and they are caught in a trap that is formed between a straight side
146
of one magnet and the slanted face
136
of the next magnet protector. The cuttings accumulate within this trap space and are held there until milling is finished and the tool
100
is retrieved. The heel portion of the magnet protector acts as a “skid” to allow continuous forcing of the cuttings into a magnetic field created by adjacent magnets.
This procedure is different from conventional methods, where a mule shoe first removes small particles and then cutting or milling is performed. The apparatus of the present invention allows performing several procedures in one step. It is possible to still use a cuttings boot basket, if desired for maximum removal of cuttings, although experiments performed with the apparatus of the present invention demonstrated a significantly high cutting removal rate.
The tool of the present invention is particularly advantageous in horizontal or directional drilling where gravity-assisted cuttings collection is not available. The tool of the present invention, by attracting the cuttings and holding them in “traps” facilitates a greater rate of cuttings removal than was available before.
The number of individual magnets
122
in a magnet assembly can vary. Normally, four or five magnets work satisfactorily when equidistantly spaced about the circumference of the body
102
. During rotation of the tool
100
, the magnets provide an almost 360 degree coverage and create a strong magnetic field for attracting metal cuttings and miscellaneous items.
In conventional operations, the first step is usually to remove sand or small soil particles that accumulated on top of a packer. Using a drill stem to lower a circulating pipe with an angularly cut nozzle to the depth where the packer is located usually performs this step. The circulating air/fluids stream lifts up the sand, mixes it with the drilling mud solution and carries it to the surface. To increase lifting capability, fluids that are more viscous may be used. The present invention also uses high viscous fluids. However, these fluids assist in moving the cuttings into the “traps.”
However, even fluids with high viscosity value are unable to lift up metal cuttings. Therefore, the next conventional step is to use a milling tool that will cut away pieces of metal and allow the circulating fluid to carry them up to the surface. The tool of the present invention can be lowered into a wellbore together with the jet sub, as shown in
FIG. 7
or with a milling bit, as shown in
FIG. 6
, thus eliminating one or even two steps of conventional methods.
By using a magnetic tool together with the milling bit the user effectively introduces the retrieval means directly into the working stream and facilitates immediate adherence of the cuttings to the magnets. Consequently, the time lost in removing the packer can be effectively minimized. The tools
10
and
100
of the present invention may be used for any length of time in the well bore. In contrast, a conventional “hydrostatic surge tool” must be retrieved and reset after a four- or five-time surge. It may take from 1 to 5 minutes to complete a surge cycle.
Even further, a “hydrostatic surge tool” can retrieve large pieces of debris but it will not allow recovery of small cuttings and other metal pieces. Since conventional tools do not have circulating capabilities, they often becomes plugged with cuttings and miscellaneous debris, which prevents proper operation and creates a hazard in the event of a “kick” or “blow-out.” In contrast, the tool of the present invention, by allowing circulation, does not become plugged and will not hinder a well-killing operation.
The size and number of the magnets
122
, as well as the number of magnet assemblies can vary, depending on the size of the drill string, the diameter of the annulus and the amount of cuttings to be retrieved. If desired, the magnets may be staggered or offset from each other in relation to the magnet assemblies to achieve maximum efficiency. The magnet member may be manufactured from ceramic or rare earth material, insulated and/or stainless steel coated to ensure a long service life.
It is envisioned that the tool of the present invention may be designed with magnets positioned on the interior wall of the central opening. The internal positioning will allow for reverse circulating retrieval of larger pieces of debris.
The diameter of the tool may be reduced to run with wire-line or coiled tubing, if necessary, although larger scale tools may be produced based on the principles discussed above. The tool of the present invention may be successfully run with casing scrapers, scratchers and/or brush tools when conditioning of the well bore for production equipment takes place.
The profile of the magnets positioned on the tool bodies assures 360-degree coverage with right-hand rotation. The tool will continue to work even when circulation stops and even in high temperature environment. Since the tool has no “skirts”, it may be successfully employed in perforated zones without the fear of hang-ups in cased holes or where casing has splintered.
The tool connections have conventional sizes to allow connecting of the tool body with currently used drilling and work over equipment. Oversized tool joints create a centralizing effect and allow retrieval of cuttings and debris without being pulled off the tool during retrieval.
The apparatus of the present invention may be successfully used for a number of operations, such as running above reverse circulation baskets to catch miscellaneous pieces, bearings, rings, etc.; for running with fishing magnets to retrieve various items from the wellbore; for running with a mule shoe to wash sand and recover miscellaneous items; for running with milling equipment to recover cuttings from a well bore. The latter type of use has an additional benefit of keeping the cuttings away from the milling bit to allow for more efficient milling operations.
The tool of the present invention may be also used for running below a tubing conveyed perforating guns to recover shrapnel from the well bore, for running with J-latch or conventional overshot to recover miscellaneous items and retrieve packer plugs; for running with a jet sub for stirring miscellaneous debris and retrieving it to the surface, which allows recovery without wedging debris, as it happens when conventional equipment is used. The magnetic tools of the present invention can be also run in tandem in heavy milling and fishing operations. It can be successfully used for retrieval of various small tools and parts dropped accidentally into the well bore.
Due to a streamline design of the apparatus of the present invention, it can be washed over and retrieved with conventional fishing methods, if necessary. Such result cannot be achieved with conventional boot baskets that traditionally have oversized skirts. Cleaning of the tool of the present invention is relatively simple, and it can be run down hole again in a matter of minutes.
Many changes and modification can be made in the design of the present invention without departing from the spirit thereof. I, therefore, pray that my rights to the present invention be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
Claims
- 1. A method of retrieving metal particles from a well bore, comprising the following steps:providing a tool body having a central opening therein; providing a plurality of magnet assemblies longitudinally spaced along said tool body, each magnet assembly comprising a plurality of magnet members, said magnet members covering a majority surface area of said tool body, exterior surfaces of said magnet members defining metal particles settling area; detachably non-rotatable securing each of said magnet members on said tool body; lowering said body into the well bore and imparting rotation to said tool body, thereby creating a magnetic field and causing metal particles to settle on said magnet assemblies; providing a magnet protector for each of said magnet members for deflecting a striking force of said metal particles on said magnet members; and forming one side of each of said magnet protectors with a length greater than a corresponding side of the immediately adjacent magnet member to thereby protect the immediately adjacent magnet member from striking force of metal particles being attracted by the magnet member.
- 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising a step of forming a trap space between a slanted face of said magnet protector and a side of the immediately adjacent magnet member.
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
3637033 |
Mayall |
Jan 1972 |
|
4438810 |
Wilkinson |
Mar 1984 |
|