This application is filed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 371 as national stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2018/054097, filed on Jun. 7, 2018 entitled “APPARATUS FOR SCANNING LASER THERAPY” in the name of Francesco Zanata et al., which claims priority to Italian Patent Application No. 102017000062592 filed on Jun. 8, 2017, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates to an apparatus for scanning laser therapy.
More precisely, the present invention relates to a medical apparatus which has a frame on which a plurality of multiple wavelengths lasers are made to slide in motorized and automated manner for applying the scanning laser onto and through the skin and mucous membranes of a patient. The frame itself is also motorized, whereby allowing its installation on the patient without the person needing to move from their bed. The apparatus is programmed so as to determine the choice of treatment autonomously on the basis of parameters determined by the device itself during the pretreatment step and vary the treatment parameters in real time for treatment optimization and safety purposes.
Traditional laser devices for therapeutic purposes envisage static parameter setting modes, every setting is based on a standard therapeutic indication and no specific adjustment based on real tissue absorption and on the desired effects according to the individual patient's therapeutic needs are provided.
Actually, in such devices the patient's absorption profile is not even automatically assessed.
The emission power setting is such to be fixed for all wavelengths used in a treatment, or divided between all wavelengths, without a specific balancing mode according to the effects to be achieved on the patient, but only in order not to exceed the safety temperature for the tissue.
The power in some conventional devices may vary during the treatment, but only according to the principle of not exceeding the maximum allowed skin temperature. For this purpose, in some traditional lasers, temperature is controlled by a thermal sensor, solely for the purpose of not burning the patient.
The modulation frequency setting is such to be fixed for all wavelengths used. In the cases in which modulation frequency is varied during the treatment, the variation is identical for all wavelengths without such variation being calibrated to achieve specific therapeutic effects.
On some traditional lasers, the user is prompted to choose the patient's skin photo-type, this setting remaining the sole opinion of the physician on the basis of visual diagnosis and not determined by an automatic system.
An apparatus for administering a laser therapy, in which a patient is irradiated from above and from below a bed, is known from patent application US2010324426A. To do this, the bed is equipped with movable slats, so that one linear zone of the body can be treated at a time. This device is complicated and the method for modifying it (moving the slats) during the treatment is extremely heavy and long, requiring the continuous presence of an operator (therapist). The same patent application relates to a laser therapy machine in which the patient is seated and an entire laser (generator (diode) and irradiation head) is made to move along a horizontal arched support which is also made to translate vertically. This arrangement is equally complicated and very difficult to implement, because the positioning of the patient is difficult and the motor equipment for moving the laser generator becomes increasingly larger as the laser power increases. Such structure may not be suited for medium- or high-intensity therapy and shows mechanical problems also for low-intensity therapies. The described apparatus also uses a feedback given by a proximity sensor integral with the movable laser device to maintain a uniform distance from the patient's body. There are no on-the-fly adjustments of the laser in order to maximize the effect of the therapy and minimize the risks for the patient.
An apparatus for administering a laser therapy, similar to the one described above, is also known from patent application EP1163887A1. Again here, there are no on-the-fly adjustments of the laser in order to maximize the effect of the therapy and minimize the risks for the patient. Furthermore, in this system, the laser head is raised and lowered and this is very dangerous, for example if the patient raises an arm. The problem of uncontrolled heating of the patient's skin is solved in a very unsatisfactory manner by sending a jet of cold air onto the skin. Still, the laser head is moved remotely by means of a joystick. The whole system is therefore operator-dependent.
Additionally, the systems according to the prior art are based on static therapeutic parameters, which manage a treatment by setting the power, the modulation, the treatment time and, in some devices, also the wavelength, whereby transferring a given energy to the patient. These data for therapeutic protocols are obtained from standard studies and are almost never corrected or optimized for the specific treatment, whereby resulting in a loss of effectiveness. Incidentally, the machines on the market have no means to be more adaptable.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a device which solves the problems and overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art.
It is the object of the present invention a device according to the appended claims, which form an integral part of the present description.
Throughout this description and in the appended claims, it is understood that the word “comprises” can be replaced by the expression “consists of”. Furthermore, elements of the embodiments may be extracted from them and used also independently from the other elements and details.
The illustrated and suggested embodiments may be combined.
Foreword on Absorption Definition and Calculation
With reference to
The absorbed and transmitted radiation depends on the physical properties of the tissue, such as color and composition (e.g. amount of water of the tissue, blood, melanin, and all the tissue chromophores).
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Specifically, we have similar definitions for each wavelength. Having predetermined a constant surface power and a short time Δt, the temperature difference ΔT is measured between the start and end of the laser emission at length λi (ΔTλ
Alternatively and preferably, having predetermined a maximum temperature Tmax to be reached on the skin surface, such as not to cause pain/burns, the time required Δt to reach such temperature is measured starting from a minimum predetermined temperature, so as to obtain αλi.
The coefficient αλi indicates the temperature increase of the skin when a laser light of average power p is applied on a non-point-like surface and non-null area (e.g. a unitary surface). αλi is the inverse of the thermal capacity of the skin, and, since it is strongly dependent on the absorbed wavelength λi it will be named “skin absorption” for the sake of simplicity. In both method alternatives above we have:
αλi is measured in Kelvins/Joules.
The device obtains the body-skin profile on the basis of the ΔT° C. detected for the different λ.
In more detail, with reference to the preceding figures, absorption αλ is measured by measuring the patient's skin temperature. If the instantaneous measured temperature Tt is lower than a temperature Tmin, the method continues; otherwise, the laser application position on the skin is changed and the methods starts again.
The device continuously emits predetermined low power (e.g. 1 W) (starting from wavelength 1 up to n, in any order), and the irradiation continues to temperature Tt<Tmin.
At this point, a computerized calculation unit calculates the time to reach a second temperature Tt=Tmax. On the basis of the previous formula, αλ is calculated (see formula (1) above).
The cycle starts again proceeding with the calculation of the absorptions, emitting the successive wavelengths λ.
Considering a superposition of the effects, the laser head identifies a single temperature difference during the treatment, to be considered as the sum of the temperature contributions of the different wavelengths:
ΔT=ΔTλ
ΔT=Δt(αλ
The αλn determine a profile for adjusting the powers (average or peak) during treatment, so as not to exceed a predetermined temperature (
After having measured these absorptions, with reference to
At the start of the treatment, the physician chooses a set of parameters displayed on screen, e.g. represented in the form of a Kiviat diagram. The set of these parameters will be called S and will be described in details below. The power emitted during the treatment will be correlated to the temperature measured by the temperature sensor, therefore, on the basis of the detected temperature, the device will change the power (peak or average), frequency and duty cycle parameters in real-time so as to follow the powers and frequencies deriving from the processing of the profile parameters S chosen at the onset by the physician and limiting the skin surface temperature to a safe maximum temperature.
Ptot=Pstot(λ1,λ2, . . . λn,Sρ)−G(t,αλ1,αλ2 . . . ,αλn,ΔT,Sρ) (5)
wherein t is the instantaneous time and Sρ={s1, s2 . . . sr} is the set of r (with r being a positive integer, and ρ=1, 2, . . . , r), i.e. initial parameters chosen by the user. In particular, for the only sake of simplification for medical staff, such parameters can be made to correspond to points of a Kiviat diagram, as shown in
The function Pstot is a method which transforms the parameters chosen by the physician into a power which will be emitted by the device during the treatment. Such method can be based, for example, on the use of look-up tables and interpolation algorithms. Analytical expressions can also be used for the function Pstot, or other optimization algorithms (e.g. statistical), according to cases and conveniences.
G is a feedback function (
The physician sets the treatment parameters (see
The physician performs the treatment with powers pλi for i=1, . . . , n for the various wavelengths, in which the total power is Pstot=Σi=1npλi (lowercase p means single power, uppercase P means the sum).
The skin temperature Tt in the treatment area is measured during the treatment and the power parameters are adapted on the basis of this temperature according to the aforesaid function G. When a preset time limit or a preset maximum irradiated energy (or “limit”) is reached, the treatment is concluded (maximum energies or maximum times of the entire treatment are predetermined by persons skilled in the art, e.g. empirically, according to the desired therapy and the body area to be treated).
Describing the method in more detail, be n the number of wavelengths λ that the device according to the invention can emit.
P is a set of powers p emitted by the various wavelengths of the device:
Pλ={pλ1,pλ2, . . . ,pλn}
Be γ a step, i.e. the emission of a plurality of laser beams having a wavelength λ1, λ2, . . . λn, with respective powers pλ1, pλ2, . . . pλn, frequencies fλ1, fλ2, . . . , fλn, and duty-cycles δλ1, δλ2, . . . , δλn, which are emitted with the respective energies eλ1, eλ2, . . . , eλn:
It is worth noting here that γ may also depend on pλi without δλi or vice versa because they both have the adjustment of the average power which is the one which contributes to the overheating of the patient as a consequence. In the first case, the duty-cycle may also be kept fixed in therapeutic treatments to a predetermined value.
Let Γ be a treatment, i.e. a set m of steps γ:
Γ={γ1,γ2, . . . ,γm}
Without complicating the notation, it is worth noting that for different steps γ1, γ2, . . . , γm, the wavelengths will always be the n above, while the other values of the matrix may be different from step to step in general.
S is a number r of points of the Kiviat diagram (or other equivalent diagram or a different starting diagram but which makes it possible to choose the medical parameters or simply a number of initial parameters set in any manner). These points represent the number of therapeutic effects desired by the physician, wherein each element has a weight s between 0 and 1:
S={s1,s2, . . . ,sr} 0≤sj≤1
j=1 . . . r
The device contains a look-up table tab(P) in its memory which links the points S with a set of powers Pi,j. The set of the powers Pi,j of each point and wavelength may be obtained from empirical results which maximize the effect representing j-th branch, or may be initial estimated values which are then adjusted over time.
The powers of each step of the treatment will be:
pλi∈Pi,j
Pi,j=[pmin i,j,pmax i,j]
Given a point sj of a Kiviat axis which represents an effect correlated to the power, if we have pmin ij in the zero position and we have pmax ij in the maximum position, the therapy will be adapted to the point pλi chosen by the therapist between (with possible interpolation):
pλi(sj)=pmin i,j with sj=0
pλi(sj)=pmax i,j with sj=1
The exact value in this interval is calculated with a predetermined function, e.g. an interpolation function. This is because the physician in the experimentation step of the therapy determines the effective intervals and then the device decides what exact value to apply alone. This exact value will be called pλi,j(sj)∈Pi,j.
The power of each single wavelength which will be calculated as initial total therapy power with multiple wavelengths and multiple selected therapeutic effects, will be a combination of all the effects S:
pλ
wherein PS is a preset function, e.g. a statistical function, in particular an arithmetic or weighed mean:
pλ
The total initial power of the treatment will be the sum of all the points of the matrix tab(P):
Pstot(λi,S)=Σi=1npλi
tab(P) is shown below:
The device contains a table tab(F) in its memory which links the points S of the Kiviat diagram to a set of frequencies Fi,j. The set Fi,j is obtained from empirical results which maximize the effect representing the j-th axis, or may be initial estimated values, which are then optionally adjusted over time.
The frequencies (amplitude modulation) of each step of the treatment will be:
fλi∈Fi,jFi,j=[fmin i,j,fmax i,j] j=1 . . . r
Given a Kiviat branch, which represents an effect correlated to frequency, if we have a measurement of the maximum interval Fi,j in the position zero s and a measurement of the minimum interval Fi,j in the maximum position s, the therapy will be adapted to point f chosen by the therapist, so that it is comprised between (with possible interpolation):
Fi,jmax with sj=0
Fi,jmin with sj=1
The exact value in this interval is calculated with a predetermined function, e.g. an interpolation function. This is because the physician in the experimentation step of the therapy determines the effective intervals and then the device decides what exact value to apply alone. This exact value will be called fλi,j(sj)∈Fi,j.
The modulation frequency of each individual wavelength will be calculated by any statistical function (e.g.: maximum search, minimum search, etc., on the intersection, union etc. of the intervals) which acts on the sets Fi,j:
fλ
wherein FS is a preset function, e.g. a statistical function, in particular an arithmetic or weighed mean:
fλ
in the case of non-disjoint intervals. If instead the intervals are disjoint, then there will be as many successive steps as the disjoint intervals, while the function FS referred to above will be used for the others.
tab(F) is shown below:
The device further contains a table tab(E) in its memory which links the points S of the Kiviat diagram with a set of energies Ei,j. The set Ei,j is obtained from empirical results which maximize the effect representing the branch or may be initial estimated values.
The energies of each step of the treatment will be:
eλi∈Ei,j
Ei,j=[emin i,j,emax i,j]
Given a Kiviat branch, which represents an effect correlated to the energy to be emitted in the treatment, if we have minimum energy emin in the zero position and maximum energy emax in the maximum position, each wavelength must emit an energy eλi such that:
eλi(sj)=emini,j with sj=0
eλi(sj)=emaxi,j with sj=1
The exact value in this interval is calculated with a predetermined function, e.g. an interpolation function. This is because the physician in the experimentation step of the therapy determines the effective intervals and then the device decides what exact value to apply alone. This exact value will be called eλi,j(sj)∈Ei,j.
The energy of each single wavelength which will be calculated as the initial total therapy energy with multiple wavelengths and multiple selected therapeutic effects will be a combination of all the effects S:
eλ
wherein ES is a preset function, e.g. a statistical function, in particular an arithmetic or weighed mean:
eλ
tab(E) is shown below:
The energies can be split into the steps in a homogeneous way or according to a distribution algorithm, which depends on the parameters S.
More details on the determination of the various steps of the method are provided below:
The method according to the invention may use different algorithms.
The first algorithm determines the number of steps of a treatment.
After the therapist has chosen the parameters S, the treatment Γ is processed as a set m of successive steps γ:
Γ={γ1,γ2, . . . ,γm}
For each wavelength, there may be multiple different modulation frequencies which make it possible to obtain the effects of the various parameters S. The number of steps M is thus the maximum number of necessary modulation frequencies between all wavelengths. So it is the maximum number of subsets Fλ,j of the table tab(F) to which the frequency fλ belongs:
fλ={fλ1,fλ2, . . . ,fλn}
being fλ the modulation frequency vector in a step. The number m of steps is obviously at most r (number of parameters).
The time t of each step will depend on the energy Eλ,j obtained from tab(E).
It is worth specifying here that instead the powers and/or the duty-cycles will remain preferably the same for each step, so as to not influence the effects given by the modulation frequencies excessively. In all cases, the powers may also be varied provided that the empirical results justify the change. This is also possible because the powers in the table are given as intervals and so there is almost always a margin.
Since the power varies during the step (see function G which adjusts the total power), the total step time is variable and will be calculated on-the-fly by means of the function G (according to how much the skin is overheated).
Before treatment, we have an algorithm of:
During the treatment, we have an algorithm of:
The function G seen above is a correction of the treatment starting power Ps(λi,Sρ) and may be for example:
Ptot=Ps(λi,Sρ)−G(t,αλi,ΔT,Sρ)
We will see an example with two wavelengths λ1, λ2.
We will assume that there are 2 effects, so 2 Kiviat axes, called “BIOSTIMULATION”, represented by s1, “ANALGESIC”, represented by s2.
The user selects:
A table tab(P) is assumed:
We will assume that the algorithm which determines the pλi is linear of the type:
pλ1,1(s1)=0.5+0.2(1−0.5)=0.6 W
pλ1,2(s2)=0.1+0.8(2−0.1)=1.62 W
We will assume that the statistic function PS is an arithmetic mean. Therefore, we then have:
Similarly, we have:
The power output in instant t=0, is:
Ps(λ1,λ2,s1,s2)=1.11+0.96=2.07 W
We will assume that Tmin=37.5° C., Tmax=39.5° C.
The physician performs the pretreatment in an area of the body at Tt=38° C. The device indicates to change zone because Tt=38° C.>Tmin.
The physician changes area and Tt=36.5° C. is read. The device starts the pretreatment, emitting a power P=1 W with λ1, and the sensor measures an increment of:
ΔTλ1=39.5−37.5=2° C.
In a time of: Δt1=10 s, thus obtaining a coefficient:
Similarly, we will assume an increase of 2° C. is measured in 20 s for λ2:
It can be inferred that the patient's skin overheats with λ1 faster than λ2.
We will assume that the function G is a feedback of the integral type. In this case, we have
We will assume that the function acts on the wavelengths where the effect desired by the physician is the lower of the two. Coefficients K1, K2 will be of the type:
with k1, k2 multiplication constants which stabilize the feedback system.
For example, assuming that the temperature sampling time is 3 seconds, if the temperature sensor measures an increase of 0.9° C. in the first sample and that the system is stable with k1=0.05, k2=0.1, we have:
The feedback function G will lower the power of λ1 by 0.68 W and λ2 by 0.38 W.
In output we have:
Ptot=Ps(λi,Sρ)−G(t,αλi,ΔT,Sρ)
Ptot=(1.11+1.8)−(0.68+0.38)W
pλ1=1.11−0.68=0.43 W
pλ2=0.96−0.38=0.58 W
We will assume that the “Biostimulation” effect s1 is concentrated on high modulation frequencies (around 1 kHz), while the “Analgesic” effect s2 is concentrated on low frequencies (around 10 Hz).
We will assume that the extension of the interval related to λ1 is much greater than the one related to λ2 because λ1 is scarcely influential as the modulation frequency varies, and that the benefits of λ2 are for a restricted interval of frequencies. We will have an empirical table of the type:
The following is desired:
F1,1max=[1 Hz,10 kHz] with s1=0
F1,1min=[1 kHz,1 kHz] with s1=1
F1,2max=[1 Hz,100 Hz] with s2=0
F1,2min=[5 Hz,15 Hz] with s2=1
F2,1max=[900 Hz,1.1 kHz] with s1=0
F2,1min=[1 kHz,1 kHz] with s1=1
F2,2max=[9 Hz,11 Hz] with s2=0
F2,2min=[10 Hz,10 Hz] with s2=1
The physician's choices were S1=0.2, S2=0.8.
Assuming that the interval varies in a linear manner, we have:
F1,1=[1+0.2*(1000−1),10000−0.2*(10000−1000)]
F1,1≅[201 Hz,8200 Hz]
F1,2=[1+0.8*(5−1),100−0.8*(100−15)]
F1,2≅[4 Hz,32 Hz]
F2,1=[900+0.2*(1000−900),1100−0.2*(1100−1000)]
F2,1≅[920 Hz,1080 Hz]
F2,2=[10+0.8*(10−9),11−0.8*(11−10)]
F2,2≅[10 Hz,10 Hz]
Table tab(F) becomes:
We will assume that the function FS acts on the sets intersection.
We have two disjoint intervals both for λ1 and for λ2.
We will assume that the average value is used for each interval:
A treatment Γ will therefore be performed as a set of 2 steps:
If the choice had been:
we would have two non-disjoint intervals for λ1. We would have two disjoint intervals for λ2. The total steps thus remain 2, where λ1 will always emit the same frequency, while λ2 will emit one frequency per step.
If FS acts on the central/average value of the intersection of the non-disjoint intervals, we have:
and the steps become:
We will assume that little energy λ1 is needed to have the “BIOSTIMULATION” effect and conversely that a lot of energy λ2, is needed for the “ANALGESIC” effect:
We will assume that the algorithm which determines the eλi is linear of the type:
eλ1,1(s1)=eλ1,1(0.2)=20+0.2(30−20)=22 J
eλ1,2(s2)=eλ1,2(0.8)=1+0.8(3−1)=2.6 J
eλ2,1(s1)=eλ2,1(0.2)=1+0.2(2−1)=1.2 J
eλ2,2(s2)=eλ2,2(0.8)=10+0.8(15−10)=14 J
It is worth noting that the particular algorithm will be in general decided together with the physician who provides the treatment according to empirical results.
The total energy emitted by λ1 must be:
eλ
eλ
The energies may be distributed in the various steps according to distribution algorithms (in general decided together with the physician who provides the treatment according to empirical results). For example, here we have chosen to subdivide the energies for each step in equal manner:
Another possible distribution algorithm may be that of associating with each step, each
eλi,j(s1)∈Ei,j j=1 . . . r
In this case, we would have:
Device According to the Invention
With reference to
To the CPU 105 may be connected a graphic screen 106.
The output of the laser modules 103 is sent by means of respective optical fibers 102 to respective heads 120 for skin application, provided with infrared sensor 121 (or other sensor) for measuring the temperature.
It is worth specifying here that the laser heads 120 do not contain the laser generation part, but only the end part of the optical fibers which depart from the laser module or modules 103 and possibly other sensors and/or devices which do not relate to laser beam generation. As a result, the laser heads are very light and in practice the method according to the present description moves the end parts of the optical fibers, with great energy savings and reduction of the risk of mechanical interference between the complete laser devices which are usually used in the prior art.
It is worth noting that the head is a motorized unit 122 controlled by computer (the CPU 105 itself, for example). The laser head receives the laser light from an electro-optical connector or optic fiber 102. The received light passes through one or more lenses 123 before reaching the skin.
A distance sensor 124 may be present in the laser head (distance between head and patient and/or position of the carriage along the arch).
The CPU 105 is connected to a data connection 125 to the head 120 to exchange data for the purposes of acquiring the instantaneous temperature and the distance/position.
Using the pre-calculated skin absorption and the instantaneous skin temperature acquired by the sensor 121, the CPU calculates the correction function G and adjusts the power and other emission parameters in real time with a feedback cycle.
In this manner, both the patient's safety and the effectiveness of the therapy according to medical indications is ensured, by virtue of an entirely automatic adjustment (which therefore does not require the intervention of a physician during the therapy itself, which can be performed by other staff).
Scanning Apparatus According to the Invention
Figures from 11 to 14 illustrate an apparatus which implements the method referred to above, but which is also independent and may implement other methods. When implementing the method above, one or more laser heads with a temperature sensor are used.
The apparatus 200 for laser therapy of a patient 300, firstly comprises at least one arched support 210 which defines an arch, with a first arch end 217 and a second arch end 218. The arch may be continuous as in
The apparatus may also comprise a suspension system 230,250 of said at least one arched support 210. For example, the suspension system comprises moving means, e.g. a wheeled system or a sliding system on guides fixed to the patient's bed 400 (not shown) or other system. Optionally, there may be a vertical adjustment system 230 of the arched support. The vertical adjustment system may also comprise an ultrasound sensor (not shown) to calculate the distance of the arch from the specific patient.
Obviously, it comprises at least one laser generation unit 220 either connected or fixed to said at least one arched support 210.
One or more guides 215 are fixed along the arch of said at least one arched support 210.
At the end of the aforesaid laser emission, at least one laser head 212 is connected, by means of sliding connection means, on at least one of said one or more guides 215, said at least one laser head 212 having a respective laser emission direction towards the inside of said at least one arched support 210 (see below for further details).
Motorized means are present for moving said at least one laser head slidingly along at least one portion of said at least one of said one or more guides 215. The sliding extension will depend on the type of treatment, in all cases a sliding as wide as possible is preferable in order to be able to reach all the uncovered parts of the body, while the patient is on the bed 400.
At least one volumetric scanning sensor 214 is integrally connected to said at least one arched support 210 and is configured to detect a volume occupied by said patient, in use. This is important because the system needs to know where to direct the laser beams and in some cases patient's mass must be calculated. The volumetric scanning system is not a proximity sensor, which works in linear manner along a line, but a system which renders an entire volume, i.e. the three-dimensional shape of the patient on the bed. It may be a suitable camera or other sensor. In an embodiment, the volumetric scanning system comprises a series of TOF (Time Of Light) sensors distributed along the arch of the device. Given a correct distribution of the TOF (Time Of Light) sensors along the arch (practically, they are placed under the arch, e.g. by the side of where the laser fibers slide), the software of the device processes the data read by the sensors and reproduces a 3D scanner, both temporally and spatially. This is used to determine the best possible geometry and accuracy, obtaining the reconstruction of the spatial geometry of the patient's body. The proximity sensor may still be present because it performs an independent function, i.e. it is used during the treatment to ensure a uniform distance of the laser head from the patient. Instead, the volumetric sensor is usually used before the treatment for reconstructing the entire patient's shape and volume to see how deep the tissues to be treated are. Optionally, the volumetric sensor can be used to calculate the patient's volume and then the patient's average density, and then adjust the dose of laser energy to be administered on the basis of the average density of the body. The dose for the area can be calculated according to the body area to be treated.
According to the present description, it is possible and advantageous to calculate the minimum energy emin and the maximum energy emax on each axis of the Kiviat diagram described above and illustrated by correcting the value set by the physician with a coefficient which will be calculated on the basis of the detection of the volumetric sensor. Indeed, it is apparent that if the same energy were given to a hand and a belly, being the surface/volume ratio much higher in the hand, one runs the risk of side effects or a lower treatment effectiveness, respectively. Accordingly, the values for the hand must be lowered and the values for the belly must be raised according to their volume. A different correction is possible for each axis of the Kiviat diagram. The exact coefficients will be determined empirically, by measuring the volumes and the effects obtained on various subjects.
At least one temperature sensor for detecting, in use, an instantaneous temperature Tt of the skin of said patient 300 under said arched support 210. Conveniently, an infrared sensor may be used.
Obviously, there is a central processing unit, which in the drawings is incorporated in the same housing 220 as the laser generator (but can also be placed in a different position), electronically connected to said at least one temperature sensor, to said at least one volumetric scanning sensor 214 and to said motorized means. A program is installed on the central unit 220 and configured to actuate said at least one laser generation unit 220 and said motorized means, on the basis of predefined data (e.g. therapy to be performed), the temperature detected by said at least one temperature sensor and of the data detected by said at least one volumetric scanning sensor 214.
There may also be a single guide. There may also be two laser heads 212 (regardless of the number of guides), each connected in sliding manner and moved by said motorized means on half of said single guide (or multiple guides), wherein said at least two laser heads 212 are optionally equipped with position sensors to avoid collisions between them.
There may be four (or more) laser heads, with the first two first laser heads 212 moved by said motorized means on (substantially) one half of said single guide, and two second laser heads 212 moved by said motorized means on the other (substantially) half of said single guide. Reference numeral 216 indicates the support for moving the connecting cables between the laser generator and the laser heads.
Referring to
As mentioned above, the suspension system 230,250 consists of two sets of vertical guides 250 connected to two respective motorized wheel devices 230, the two sets of vertical guides being connected to said first end 217 and to said second end 218, respectively, so that said arched support 210 is adjustable in height with respect to said wheeled devices 230 by means of respective height adjustment systems (not shown), said motorized wheeled devices 230 and said respective height adjustment systems being operable by said central processing unit 220 according to said predefined data, the temperature detected by said at least one temperature sensor and of the data detected by said at least one volumetric scanning sensor 214.
The program installed on said central processing unit 220 is conveniently configured to actuate said at least one laser generating unit 220 and said motorized means on the basis of a dose to be supplied to the patient and calculated on the basis of the data detected by said at least one volumetric scanning sensor 214 and by said at least one temperature sensor and by predetermined information about the area of the patient to be treated.
Finally, a touchscreen interface can be advantageously provided on said arched support for setting a laser therapy plan.
Referring to
A plurality of machines 420 according to the present description form a system 400 and are connected either individually or in groups to a server 430 by means of connections 430, e.g. Internet connections.
An optimization algorithm 300 is responsible for updating the initial parameters 310 of each machine or group of machines. This takes place starting from the initial standard parameters 310, to which the data related to the patient's mass obtained by said volumetric sensor are added. With all these parameters, the machine performs a therapy in 330. At the end of the therapy, in 350, the device examines the parameters for each effect targeted by therapy. It asks the patient and/or the physician to provide a numerical assessment of the result of each targeted effect in 360 and these assessments are transmitted to the server in 370. A database is increased on the server in this manner by all the machines. In such a manner, at the time of a new therapy in 380, the method queries the database in 390 and the standard parameters are redefined on the basis of the data of all or part of the similar therapies. For example, standard parameters are reset in 395 as average parameters of the similar or identical therapies. The standard parameters may be, for example, energy, irradiance, wavelength and modulation.
Examples of questions asked for assessment are the following:
The errors of any incorrect assessments provided to devices by therapists are automatically mitigated over time, because the comparison of the parameters of each single device occurs on the average of the parameters of all other devices; consequently, errors will be automatically canceled out over time, therapy after therapy.
This progressive group self-learning system on global level between the devices, independently and automatically, will transform a static therapy device into an intelligent device, which will increasingly optimize treatments more and more on its own, to approach a performance perfection which would not be achievable manually or with any other software system.
According to an additional or alternative aspect of the present description, the system in order to accomplish the aforesaid optimization or for other purposes, envisages the use of Artificial Intelligence routine, e.g. by means of Neural Networks or Convolutional Neural Networks, to optimize the treatment parameters autonomously, initially starting from a setting of standard or preset parameters.
For example, the Artificial Intelligence can optimize the questions for the aforesaid assessments according to the assessments of therapies themselves and/or according to other useful information.
These data allow the Artificial Intelligence to learn from past experiences of the same machine if similar conditions of the patient occur again.
The aforesaid database above is on a server, but it could be replicated locally. The artificial intelligence may also be local and/or on the server.
Importantly, the Artificial Intelligence must use the training data to recognize the best possible treatment (in terms of objective parameters of the therapeutic device, such as for example laser source parameters, irradiance, modulation, energy, wavelengths) for the individual patient on the basis of the intrinsic relations which it can obtain from the data.
The embodiment with the Artificial Intelligence provided on the single machine has the advantage of providing a complete machine, which needs to access data only.
In this manner, we have a progressive group self-learning system on global level between devices, independently and without a manual human contribution. The system, in this manner, is no longer operator-dependent and the physicians can optimize their clinical analysis and maximize the success of their care.
The first laser, L1, is at 660 nm and we have:
The area of the spot is 2 cm2, the diameter of the spot 16 mm.
The second laser, L2, is at 800 nm and we have:
The area of the spot is 5 cm2, the diameter of the spot is about 25 mm.
The third laser, L3, is at 970 nm and we have:
The area of the spot is about 12.5 cm2, the diameter of the spot is about 40 mm.
By optimizing the therapeutic parameters, it is possible to obtain multiple and different clinical benefits for the patient within the same treatment. All this guarantees maximum safety for the patient, whereby reducing possible risks of iatrogenic damage (possibly caused by the specialist due to an incorrect or inadequate pretreatment assessment which with this patent is no longer required). Moreover, by optimizing many benefits within the same treatment, the therapy times are considerably reduced both in biological terms for the patient and in economic terms for the professional. Obtaining any desired effect is visually represented by the machine in real time, peculiarity which guarantees the correct performance of the required treatment to the professional.
Hereto, we have described the preferred embodiments and suggested some variants of the present invention, but it is understood that a person skilled in the art can make modifications and changes without departing from the respective scope of protection, as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102017000062592 | Jun 2017 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2018/054097 | 6/7/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/225000 | 12/13/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20010023363 | Harth | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010053907 | Ota | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20100324426 | Tucek | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120116373 | Moench | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1163887 | Dec 2001 | EP |
2004098710 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2004098710 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2016203461 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2016203461 | Dec 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, issued in PCT/IB2018/054097, dated Oct. 8, 2018, Rijswijk, Netherlands. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200179714 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |